in English translation
Prepared by
the Canon Law Society of Great Britain and Ireland
in association with
the Canon Law Society of Australia and New Zealand
and the Canadian Canon Law Society
English translation copyright 1983 The
Canon Law Society Trust
Latest text update: 8 August 2023
(motu proprio modifying canons 295 and 296 on personal prelatures)
Latest annotation added: 12 December 2024
(Final Document of the XVI Ordinary General Assembly
of the Synod of Bishops, 24.XI.2024:
cf. canons 127, 399, 446)
cc. 111-112 published in Motu proprio De concordia inter Codices, 31 May 2016
c. 189 published in Motu proprio Learn to take your leave, 12 February 2018
c. 230 published in Motu proprio Spiritus
Domini, 10 January 2021
c. 237 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11 February 2022
c. 242 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
c. 265 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11 February 2022
cc. 295-296 published in Motu proprio modifying canons on personal
prelatures, 8 August 2023
cc. 401-402 published in Motu proprio Learn
to take your leave, 12 February 2018
c. 411 published in Motu proprio Learn to take your leave, 12 February 2018
c. 535 published in Motu proprio De concordia inter Codices, 31 May 2016
c. 579 published in Motu proprio Authenticum charismatis, 1 November 2020
c. 604 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
c. 628 published in CICLSAL Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018
c. 638 published in CICLSAL Instruction Cor
Orans, 1 April 2018
c. 665 published in CICLSAL Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018
c. 667 published in CICLSAL Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018
c. 686 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
c. 686 published in CICLSAL Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018
c. 688 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
c. 694 published in Motu proprio Communis vita, 19 March 2019
c. 695 published in Motu proprio Recognitum Librum VI, 26 April 2022
c. 699 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
c. 700 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
and Motu proprio Expedit ut iura, 2 April 2023
c. 729 published in Motu proprio Communis vita, 19 March 2019
c. 750 published in Motu proprio Ad tuendam fidem, 18 May 1998
c. 775 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
c. 838 published in Motu proprio Magnum principium, 3 September 2017
c. 868 published in Motu proprio De concordia inter Codices, 31 May 2016
cc. 1008-1009 published in Motu proprio Omnium in mentem, 26 October 2009
c. 1086 published in Motu proprio Omnium in mentem, 26 October 2009
cc. 1108-1109 published in Motu proprio De concordia inter Codices, 31 May 2016
cc. 1111-1112 published in Motu proprio De concordia inter Codices, 31 May 2016
c. 1116 published in Motu proprio De concordia inter Codices, 31 May 2016
c. 1117 published in Motu proprio Omnium in mentem, 26 October 2009
c. 1124 published in Motu proprio Omnium in mentem, 26 October 2009
c. 1127 published in Motu proprio De concordia inter Codices, 31 May 2016
c. 1308 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11
February 2022
c. 1310 published in Motu proprio Competentias quasdam decernere, 11 February 2022
cc. 1311-1399 published in Motu proprio Pascite gregem Dei,
23 May 2021
c. 1362 terminology altered by Motu proprio Praedicate Evangelium, 19
March 2022
c. 1425 amended following Motu proprio Mitis
Iudex Dominus Iesus, 15
August 2015
c. 1639 amended following Motu proprio Mitis
Iudex Dominus Iesus, 15
August 2015
cc. 1671-1691 published in Motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, 15 August 2015
cc. 1693-1694 amended following Motu proprio Mitis
Iudex Dominus Iesus, 15
August 2015
c. 1700 amended following Motu proprio Mitis
Iudex Dominus Iesus, 15
August 2015
cc. 1709-1710 terminology altered by Motu proprio Praedicate Evangelium, 19
March 2022
Can. 1 The canons of this Code concern only the Latin
Church.
Can. 2 For the most part the Code does not
determine the rites to be observed in the celebration of liturgical actions.
Accordingly, liturgical laws which have been in effect hitherto retain their
force, except those which may be contrary to the canons of the Code.
Can. 3 The canons of the Code do not abrogate, nor
do they derogate from, agreements entered into by the Apostolic See with
nations or other civil entities. For this reason, these agreements continue in
force as hitherto, notwithstanding any contrary provisions of this Code.
Can. 4 Acquired rights, and likewise privileges
hitherto granted by the Apostolic See to either physical or juridical persons,
which are still in use and have not been revoked, remain intact, unless they
are expressly revoked by the canons of this Code.
Can. 5 §1 Universal or particular
customs which have been in effect up to now but are contrary to the provisions
of these canons and are reprobated in the canons of this Code, are completely
suppressed, and they may not be allowed to revive in the future. Other contrary
customs are also to be considered suppressed, unless the Code expressly
provides otherwise, or unless they are centennial or immemorial: these latter
may be tolerated if the Ordinary judges that, in the circumstances of place and
person, they cannot be removed.
§2 Customs apart from the law, whether universal or
particular, which have been in effect hitherto, are retained.
Can. 6 §1 When this Code comes into
force, the following are abrogated:
1° the Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1917;
2° other laws, whether universal or particular, which
are contrary to the provisions of this Code, unless it is otherwise expressly
provided in respect of particular laws;
3° all penal laws enacted by the Apostolic See,
whether universal or particular, unless they are resumed in this Code itself;
4° any other universal disciplinary laws concerning
matters which are integrally reordered by this Code.
§2 To the extent that the canons of this Code
reproduce the former law, they are to be assessed in the light also of
canonical tradition.
Can. 7 A law comes into being when it is
promulgated.
Can. 8 §1 Universal ecclesiastical
laws are promulgated by publication in the ‘Acta Apostolicae Sedis’, unless in
particular cases another manner of promulgation has been prescribed. They come
into force only on the expiry of three months from the date appearing on the
particular issue of the ‘Acta’, unless because of the nature of the case they
bind at once, or unless a shorter or a longer interval has been specifically
and expressly prescribed m the law itself.
§2 Particular laws are promulgated in the manner
determined by the legislator; they begin to oblige one month from the date of
promulgation, unless a different period is prescribed in the law itself.
Can. 9 Laws concern matters of the future, not
those of the past, unless provision is made in them for the latter by name.
Can. 10 Only those laws are to be considered
invalidating or incapacitating which expressly prescribe that an act is null or
that a person is incapable.
Can. 11 Merely ecclesiastical laws bind those who
were baptised in the Catholic Church or received into it, and who have a
sufficient use of reason and, unless the law expressly provides otherwise, who
have completed their seventh year of age.
Can. 12 §1 Universal laws are binding
everywhere on all those for whom they were enacted.
§2 All those actually present in a particular
territory in which certain universal laws are not in force, are exempt from
those laws.
§3 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 13,
laws enacted for a particular territory bind those for whom they were enacted
and who have a domicile or quasi‑domicile in that territory and are
actually residing in it.
Can. 13 §1 Particular laws are not
presumed to be personal, but rather territorial, unless the contrary is clear.
§2 Peregrini are not bound:
1° by the particular laws of their own territory while
they are absent from it, unless the transgression of those laws causes harm in
their own territory, or unless the laws are personal
2° by the laws of the territory in which they are
present, except for those laws which take care of public order, or determine
the formalities of legal acts, or concern immovable property located in the
territory.
§3 Vagi are bound by both the universal and the particular laws
which are in force in the place in which they are present.
Can. 14
Laws, even invalidating and incapacitating ones, do not oblige when there is a
doubt of law. When there is a doubt of fact, however Ordinaries can dispense
from them provided, if there is question of a reserved dispensation, it is one
which the authority to whom it is reserved is accustomed to grant.
Can. 15 §1
Ignorance or error concerning invalidating or incapacitating laws does not
prevent the effect of those laws, unless it is expressly provided otherwise.
§2 Ignorance or error is not presumed about a law, a
penalty, a fact concerning oneself, or a notorious fact concerning another. It
is presumed about a fact concerning another which is not notorious, until the
contrary is proved.
[For ignorance
and error concerning penal laws see canons 1323, 2°; 1324, 8°-9°; 1325]
Can. 16 §1
Laws are authentically interpreted by the legislator and by that person to whom
the legislator entrusts the power of authentic interpretation.
[See Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022, arts.
175-182, on the role of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts]
§2 An authentic interpretation which is presented by
way of a law has the same force as the law itself, and must be promulgated. If
it simply declares the sense of words which are certain in themselves, it has
retroactive force. If it restricts or extends the law or resolves a doubt, it
is not retroactive.
§3 On the other hand, an interpretation by way of a
court judgement or of an administrative act in a particular case, does not have
the force of law. It binds only those persons and affects only those matters
for which it was given.
Can. 17
Ecclesiastical laws are to be understood according to the proper meaning of the
words considered in their text and context. If the meaning remains doubtful or
obscure, there must be recourse to parallel places, if there be any, to the
purpose and circumstances of the law, and to the mind of the legislator.
Can. 18 Laws which prescribe a penalty, or restrict
the free exercise of rights, or contain an exception to the law, are to be
interpreted strictly.
Can. 19 If on a particular matter there is not an
express provision of either universal or particular law, nor a custom, then,
provided it is not a penal matter, the question is to be decided by taking into
account laws enacted in similar matters, the general principles of law observed
with canonical equity, the jurisprudence and practice of the Roman Curia, and
the common and constant opinion of learned authors.
Can. 20
A later law abrogates or derogates from an earlier law, if it expressly so
states, or if it is directly contrary to that law, or if it integrally reorders
the whole subject matter of the earlier law. A universal law, however, does not
derogate from a particular or from a special law, unless the law expressly
provides otherwise.
Can. 21
In doubt, the revocation of a previous law is not presumed; rather, later laws
are to be related to earlier ones and, as far as possible, harmonised with
them.
Can. 22
When the law of the Church remits some issue to the civil law, the latter is to
be observed with the same effects in canon law, insofar as it is not contrary
to divine law, and provided it is not otherwise stipulated in canon law.
Can. 23
A custom introduced by a community of the faithful has the force of law only if
it has been approved by the legislator, in accordance with the following
canons.
Can. 24 §1
No custom which is contrary to divine law can acquire the force of law.
§2 A custom which is contrary to or apart from canon
law, cannot acquire the force of law unless it is reasonable; a custom which is
expressly reprobated in the law is not reasonable.
Can. 25 No custom acquires the force of law unless
it has been observed, with the intention of introducing a law, by a community
capable at least of receiving a law.
Can. 26
Unless it has been specifically approved by the competent legislator, a custom
which is contrary to the canon law currently in force, or is apart from the
canon law, acquires the force of law only when it has been lawfully observed
for a period of thirty continuous and complete years. Only a centennial or
immemorial custom can prevail over a canonical law which carries a clause
forbidding future customs.
Can. 27
Custom is the best interpreter of laws.
Can. 28 Without
prejudice to the provisions of can. 5, a custom, whether contrary to or apart
from the law, is revoked by a contrary custom or law. But unless the law makes
express mention of them, it does not revoke centennial or immemorial customs,
nor does a universal law revoke particular customs.
Can. 29
General decrees, by which a competent legislator makes common provisions for a
community capable of receiving a law, are true laws and are regulated by the
provisions of the canons on laws.
Can. 30
A general decree, as in can. 29, cannot be made by one who has only executive
power, unless in particular cases this has been expressly authorised by the
competent legislator in accordance with the law, and provided the conditions
prescribed in the act of authorisation are observed.
Can. 31 §1
Within the limits of their competence, those who have executive power can issue
general executory decrees, that is, decrees which define more precisely the
manner of applying a law, or which urge the observance of laws.
§2 The provisions of can. 8 are to be observed in
regard to the promulgation, and to the interval before the coming into effect,
of the decrees mentioned in §1.
Can. 32
General executory decrees which define the manner of application or urge the
observance of laws, bind those who are bound by the laws.
Can. 33 §1
General executory decrees, even if published in directories or other such
documents, do not derogate from the law, and any of their provisions which are
contrary to the law have no force.
§2 These decrees
cease to have force by explicit or implicit revocation by the competent
authority, and by the cessation of the law for whose execution they were
issued. They do not cease on the expiry of the authority of the person who
issued them, unless the contrary is expressly provided.
[On general executory decrees of conferences of bishops, see can. 455]
[On the juridical and disciplinary obligations of provisions contained in a directory, see Dicastery for Legislative Texts, Explanatory note, 22.X.1994]
Can. 34 §1
Instructions, namely, which set out the provisions of a law and develop the
manner in which it is to be put into effect, are given for the benefit of those
whose duty it is to execute the law, and they bind them in executing the law.
Those who have executive power may, within the limits of their competence,
lawfully publish such instructions.
§2 The regulations of an instruction do not derogate
from the law, and if there are any which cannot be reconciled with the
provisions of the law they have no force.
§3 Instructions cease to have force not only by
explicit or implicit revocation by the competent authority who published them
or by that authority’s superior, but also by the cessation of the law which
they were designed to set out and execute.
Can. 35 Within the limits of his or her competence,
one who has executive power can issue a singular administrative act, either by
decree or precept, or by rescript, without prejudice to can. 76 §1.
Can. 36 §1 An administrative act is to
be understood according to the proper meaning of the words and the common
manner of speaking. In doubt, a strict interpretation is to be given to those
administrative acts which concern litigation or threaten or inflict penalties,
or restrict the rights of persons, or harm the acquired rights of others, or
run counter to a law in favour of private persons; all other administrative
acts are to be widely interpreted.
§2 Administrative acts must not be extended to cases
other than those expressly stated.
Can. 37 An administrative act which concerns the
external forum is to be effected in writing; likewise, if it requires an
executor, the act of execution is to be in writing.
Can. 38 An administrative act, even if there is
question of a rescript given Motu proprio,
has no effect in so far as it harms the acquired right of another, or is
contrary to a law or approved custom, unless the competent authority has
expressly added a derogatory clause.
Can. 39 Conditions attached to an administrative act
are considered to concern validity only when they are expressed by the
particles ‘if’, ‘unless’, ‘provided that’.
Can. 40 The executor of any administrative act
cannot validly carry out this office before receiving the relevant document and
establishing its authenticity and integrity, unless prior notice of this
document has been conveyed to the executor on the authority of the person who
issued the administrative act.
Can. 41 The executor of an administrative act to
whom the task of execution only is entrusted, cannot refuse to execute it,
unless it is quite clear that the act itself is null, or that it cannot for
some other grave reason be sustained, or that the conditions attached to the
administrative act itself have not been fulfilled. If, however, the execution
of the administrative act would appear to be inopportune, by reason of the
circumstances of person or place, the executor is to desist from the execution,
and immediately inform the person who issued the act.
Can. 42 The executor of an administrative act must
proceed in accordance with the mandate. If, however, the executor has not
fulfilled essential conditions attached to the document, or has not observed
the substantial form of procedure, the execution is invalid.
Can. 43 The executor of an administrative act may in
his prudent judgement substitute another for himself, unless substitution has
been forbidden, or he has been deliberately chosen as the only person to be
executor, or a specific person has been designated as substitute; however, in
these cases the executor may commit the preparatory acts to another.
Can. 44 An administrative act can also be executed
by the executor’s successor in office, unless the first had been chosen
deliberately as the only person to be executor.
Can. 45 If there has been any error in the execution
of an administrative act, the executor may execute it again.
Can. 46 An administrative act does not cease on the
expiry of the authority of the person issuing it, unless the law expressly
provides otherwise.
Can. 47 The revocation of an administrative act by
another administrative act of the competent authority takes effect only from
the moment at which the person to whom it was issued is lawfully notified.
Can. 48 A singular decree is an
administrative act issued by a competent executive authority, whereby in
accordance with the norms of law a decision is given or a provision made for a
particular case; of its nature this decision or provision does not presuppose that
a petition has been made by anyone.
Can. 49 A singular precept is a decree by which an
obligation is directly and lawfully imposed on a specific person or persons to
do or to omit something, especially in order to urge the observance of a law.
Can. 50 Before issuing a singular decree, the person
in authority is to seek the necessary information and proof and, as far as
possible, is to consult those whose rights could be harmed.
Can. 51 A decree is to be issued in writing. When it
is a decision, it should express, at least in summary form, the reasons for the
decision.
Can. 52 A singular decree has effect in respect only
of those matters it determines and of those persons to whom it was issued; it
obliges such persons everywhere, unless it is otherwise clear.
Can. 53 If decrees are contrary one to another,
where specific matters are expressed, the specific prevails over the general;
if both are equally specific or equally general, the one later in time
abrogates the earlier insofar as it is contrary to it.
Can. 54 §1 A singular decree whose
application is entrusted to an executor, has effect from the moment of
execution; otherwise, from the moment when it is made known to the person on
the authority of the one who issued it.
§2 For a singular decree to be enforceable, it must be
made known by a lawful document in accordance with the law.
Can. 55 Without prejudice to cann.
37 and 51, whenever a very grave reason prevents the handing over of the
written text of a decree, the decree is deemed to have been made known if it is
read to the person to whom it is directed, in the presence of a notary or two
witnesses; a record of the occasion is to be drawn up and signed by all
present.
Can. 56 A decree is deemed to have been made known
if the person to whom it is directed has been duly summoned to receive or to
hear the decree, and without a just reason has not appeared or has refused to
sign.
Can. 57 §1 Whenever the law orders a
decree to be issued, or when a person who is concerned lawfully requests a
decree or has recourse to obtain one, the competent authority is to provide for
the situation within three months of having received the petition or recourse,
unless a different period of time is prescribed by law.
§2 If this period of time has expired and the decree
has not yet been given, then as far as proposing a further recourse is
concerned, the reply is presumed to be negative.
§3 A presumed negative reply does not relieve the
competent authority of the obligation of issuing the decree, and, in accordance
with can. 128, of repairing any harm done.
Can. 58 §1 A singular decree ceases to
have force when it is lawfully revoked by the competent authority, or when the
law ceases for whose execution it was issued.
§2 A singular precept, which was not imposed by a
lawful document, ceases on the expiry of the authority of the person who issued
it.
Can. 59 §1 A rescript is an
administrative act issued in writing by a competent authority, by which of its
very nature a privilege, dispensation or other favour is granted at someone’s
request.
§2 Unless it is otherwise established, provisions laid
down concerning rescripts apply also to the granting of permission and to the
granting of favours by word of mouth.
Can. 60 Any rescript can be obtained by all who are
not expressly prohibited.
Can. 61 Unless it is otherwise established, a
rescript can be obtained for another, even without that person’s consent, and
it is valid before its acceptance, without prejudice to contrary clauses.
Can. 62 A rescript in which there is
no executor, has effect from the moment the document was issued; the others
have effect from the moment of execution.
Can. 63 §1 Except where there is
question of a rescript which grants a favour Motu proprio, subreption, that is, the withholding of the truth,
renders a rescript invalid if the request does not express that which,
according to canonical law, style and practice, must for validity be expressed.
§2 Obreption, that is, the making of a false
statement, renders a rescript invalid if not even one of the motivating reasons
submitted is true.
§3 In rescripts of which there is no executor, the
motivating reason must be true at the time the rescript is issued; in the
others, at the time of execution.
Can. 64 Without prejudice to the right of the
Penitentiary for the internal forum, a favour refused by any department of the
Roman Curia cannot validly be granted by another department of the same Curia,
or by any other competent authority below the Roman Pontiff, without the
approval of the department which was first approached.
Can. 65 §1 Without prejudice to the
provisions of §§2 and 3, no one is to seek from another Ordinary a favour which
was refused by that person’s proper Ordinary, unless mention is made of the
refusal. When the refusal is mentioned, the Ordinary is not to grant the favour
unless he has learned from the former Ordinary the reasons for the refusal.
§2 A favour refused by a Vicar general or an episcopal
Vicar cannot be validly granted by another Vicar of the same Bishop, even when
he has learned from the Vicar who refused the reasons for the refusal.
§3 A favour refused by a Vicar general or an episcopal
Vicar and later, without any mention being made of this refusal, obtained from
the diocesan Bishop, is invalid. A favour refused by the diocesan Bishop
cannot, without the Bishop’s consent, validly be obtained from his Vicar
general or episcopal Vicar, even though mention is made of the refusal.
Can. 66 A rescript is not rendered invalid because
of an error in the name of the person to whom it is given or by whom it is
issued, or of the place in which such person resides, or of the matter
concerned, provided that in the judgement of the Ordinary there is no doubt
about the person or the matter in question.
Can. 67 §1 If it should happen that
two contrary rescripts are obtained for one and the same thing, where specific
matters are expressed, the specific prevails over the general.
§2 If both are equally specific or equally general,
the one earlier in time prevails over the later, unless in the later one there
is an express mention of the earlier, or unless the person who first obtained
the rescript has not used it by reason of deceit or of notable personal
negligence.
§3 In doubt as to whether a rescript is invalid or
not, recourse is to be made to the issuing authority.
Can. 68 A rescript of the Apostolic See in which
there is no executor must be presented to the Ordinary of the person who
obtains it only when this is prescribed in the rescript, or when there is
question of public affairs, or when it is necessary to have the conditions
verified.
Can. 69 A rescript for whose presentation no time is
determined, may be submitted to the executor at any time, provided there is no
fraud or deceit.
Can. 70 If in a rescript the very granting of the
favour is entrusted to the executor, it is a matter for the executor’s prudent
judgement and conscience to grant or to refuse the favour.
Can. 71 No one is obliged to use a rescript granted
in his or her favour only, unless bound by a canonical obligation from another
source to do so .
Can. 72 Rescripts granted by the Apostolic See which
have expired, can for a just reason be extended by the diocesan Bishop, but
once only and not beyond three months.
Can. 73 No rescripts are revoked by
a contrary law, unless it is otherwise provided in the law itself.
Can. 74 Although one who has been granted a favour
orally may use it in the internal forum, that person is obliged to prove the
favour for the external forum whenever this is lawfully requested.
Can. 75 If a rescript contains a privilege or a
dispensation, the provision of the following canons are also to be observed.
Can. 76 §1 A privilege is a favour
given by a special act for the benefit of certain persons, physical or
juridical; it can be granted by the legislator, and by an executive authority
to whom the legislator has given this power.
§2 Centennial or immemorial possession of a privilege
gives rise to the presumption that it has been granted.
Can. 77 A privilege is to be interpreted in
accordance with can. 36 §1. The interpretation must, however, always be such
that the beneficiaries of the privilege do in fact receive some favour.
Can. 78 §1 A privilege is presumed to
be perpetual, unless the contrary is proved.
§2 A personal privilege, namely one which attaches to
a person, is extinguished with the person.
§3 A real privilege ceases on the total destruction of
the thing or place; a local privilege, however, revives if the place is
restored within fifty years.
Can. 79 Without prejudice to can. 46, a privilege
ceases by revocation on the part of the competent authority in accordance with
can. 47.
Can. 80 §1 No privilege ceases by
renunciation unless this has been accepted by the competent authority.
§2 Any physical person may renounce a privilege
granted in his or her favour only.
§3 Individual persons cannot renounce a privilege
granted to a juridical person, or granted by reason of the dignity of a place
or thing. Nor can a juridical person renounce a privilege granted to it, if the
renunciation would be prejudicial to the Church or to others.
Can. 81 A privilege is not extinguished on the
expiry of the authority of the person who granted it, unless it was given with
the clause ‘at our pleasure’ or another equivalent expression.
Can. 82 A privilege which does not burden others
does not lapse through non‑use or contrary use; if it does cause an
inconvenience for others, it is lost if lawful prescription intervenes.
Can. 83 §1 Without prejudice to can.
142 §2, a privilege ceases on the expiry of the time or the completion of the
number of cases for which it was granted.
§2 It ceases also if in the judgement of the competent
authority circumstances are so changed with the passage of time that it has
become harmful, or that its use becomes unlawful.
Can. 84 A person who abuses a power given by a
privilege deserves to be deprived of the privilege itself. Accordingly, after a
warning which has been in vain, the Ordinary, if it was he who granted it, is
to deprive the person of the privilege which he or she is gravely abusing; if
the privilege has been granted by the Apostolic See, the Ordinary is obliged to
make the matter known to it.
Can. 85 A dispensation, that is, the relaxation of a
merely ecclesiastical law in a particular case, can be granted, within the
limits of their competence, by those who have executive power, and by those who
either explicitly or implicitly have the power of dispensing, whether by virtue
of the law itself or by lawful delegation.
Can. 86 In so far as laws define those elements
which are essentially constitutive of institutes or of juridical acts, they are
not subject to dispensation.
Can. 87 §1 Whenever he judges that it contributes to their spiritual welfare, the diocesan Bishop can dispense the faithful from disciplinary laws, both universal laws and those particular laws made by the supreme ecclesiastical authority for his territory or his subjects. He cannot dispense from procedural laws or from penal laws, nor from those whose dispensation is specially reserved to the Apostolic See or to some other authority.
[See Authentic
Interpretation of canon 87 §1, 5.VII.1985 concerning dispensation from canonical
form for the marriage of two Catholics; Authentic
Interpretation of canon 767 §1, 20.VI.1987 concerning dispensation from the
reservation of the homily to a priest or deacon]
§2 If recourse to the Holy See is difficult, and at
the same time there is danger of grave harm in delay, any Ordinary can dispense
from these laws, even if the dispensation is reserved to the Holy See, provided
the dispensation is one which the Holy See customarily grants in the same
circumstances, and without prejudice to can. 291.
Can. 88 The local Ordinary can dispense from
diocesan laws and, whenever he judges that it contributes to the spiritual
welfare of the faithful, from laws made by a plenary or a provincial Council or
by the Episcopal Conference.
Can. 89 Parish priests and other priests or deacons
cannot dispense from universal or particular law unless this power is expressly
granted to them.
Can. 90 §1 A dispensation from an
ecclesiastical law is not to be given without a just and reasonable cause,
taking into account the circumstances of the case and the importance of the law
from which the dispensation is given; otherwise the dispensation is unlawful
and, unless given by the legislator or his superior, it is also invalid.
§2 A dispensation given in doubt about the sufficiency
of its reason is valid and lawful.
Can. 91 In respect of their subjects, even if these
are outside the territory, those who have the power of dispensing can exercise
it even if they themselves are outside their territory; unless the contrary is
expressly provided, they can exercise it also in respect of peregrini actually present in the
territory; they can exercise it too in respect of themselves.
Can. 92 A strict interpretation is to be given not
only to a dispensation in accordance with can. 36 §1, but also to the very
power of dispensing granted for a specific case.
Can. 93 A dispensation capable of successive
applications ceases in the same way as a privilege. It also ceases by the
certain and complete cessation of the motivating reason.
Can. 94 §1 Statutes properly so called
are regulations which are established in accordance with the law in aggregates
of persons or of things, whereby the purpose, constitution, governance and
manner of acting of these bodies are defined.
§2 The statutes of an aggregate of persons bind
only those persons who are lawfully members of it; the statutes of an aggregate
of things bind those who direct it.
§3 The provisions of statutes which are established
and promulgated by virtue of legislative power, are regulated by the provisions
of the canons concerning laws.
Can. 95 §1 Ordinances are rules or
norms to be observed both in assemblies of persons, whether these assemblies
are convened by ecclesiastical authority or are freely convoked by the
faithful, and in other celebrations: they define those matters which concern
their constitution, direction and agenda.
§2 In assemblies or celebrations, those who take part
are bound by these rules of ordinance.
Can. 96 By baptism one is incorporated into the
Church of Christ and constituted a person in it, with the duties and the rights
which, in accordance with each one’s status, are proper to Christians, in so
far as they are in ecclesiastical communion and unless a lawfully issued
sanction intervenes.
Can. 97 §1 A person who has completed
the eighteenth year of age, has attained majority; below this age, a person is
a minor.
§2 A minor who has not completed the seventh year of
age is called an infant and is considered incapable of personal responsibility;
on completion of the seventh year, however, the minor is presumed to have the
use of reason.
Can. 98 §1 A person who has attained
majority has the full exercise of his or her rights.
§2 In the exercise of rights a minor remains subject
to parents or guardians, except for those matters in which by divine or by
canon law minors are exempt from such authority. In regard to the appointment
of guardians and the determination of their powers, the provisions of civil law
are to be observed, unless it is otherwise provided in canon law or unless, in
specific cases and for a just reason, the diocesan Bishop has decided that the
matter is to be catered for by the appointment of another guardian.
Can. 99 Whoever habitually lacks the use of reason
is considered as incapable of personal responsibility and is regarded as an
infant.
Can. 100 A person is said to be: an incola, in the
place where he or she has a domicile; an advena, in the place of quasi‑domicile;
a peregrinus, if away from the
domicile or quasi‑domicile which is still retained; a vagus, if the person has nowhere
a domicile or quasi‑domicile.
Can. 101 §1 The place of origin of a
child, and even of a neophyte, is that in which the parents had a domicile or,
lacking that, a quasi‑domicile when the child was born; if the parents
did not have the same domicile or quasi‑domicile, it is that of the
mother.
§2 In the case of a child of vagi, the place of origin is the
actual place of birth; in the case of a foundling, it is the place where it was
found.
Can. 102 §1 Domicile is acquired by
residence in the territory of a parish, or at least of a diocese, which is
either linked to the intention of remaining there permanently if nothing should
occasion its withdrawal, or in fact protracted for a full five years.
§2 Quasi‑domicile is acquired by residence in
the territory of a parish, or at least of a diocese, which is either linked to
the intention of remaining there for three months if nothing should occasion
its withdrawal, or in fact protracted for three months.
§3 Domicile or quasi‑domicile in the territory
of a parish is called parochial; in the territory of a diocese, even if not in
a parish, it is called diocesan.
Can. 103 Members of religious
institutes and of societies of apostolic life acquire a domicile in the place
where the house to which they belong is situated. They acquire a quasi‑domicile
in the house in which, in accordance with can. 102 §2, they reside.
Can. 104 Spouses are to have a
common domicile or quasi‑domicile. By reason of lawful separation or for
some other just reason, each may have his or her own domicile or quasi‑domicile.
Can. 105 §1 A minor necessarily retains
the domicile or quasi‑domicile of the person to whose authority the minor
is subject. A minor who is no longer an infant can acquire a quasi‑domicile
of his or her own and, if lawfully emancipated in accordance with the civil
law, a domicile also.
§2 One who for a reason other than minority is
lawfully entrusted to the guardianship or tutelage of another, has the domicile
and quasidomicile of the guardian or curator.
Can. 106 Domicile or quasi‑domicile
is lost by departure from the place with the intention of not returning,
without prejudice to the provisions of can. 105.
Can. 107 §1 Both through domicile and
through quasi‑domicile everyone acquires his or her own parish priest and
Ordinary.
§2 The proper parish priest or Ordinary of a vagus is the
parish priest or Ordinary of the place where the vagus is actually residing.
§3 The proper
parish priest of one who has only a diocesan domicile or quasi‑domicile
is the parish priest of the place where that person is actually residing.
[On the verifying of domicile and quasi-domicile, see Instruction Dignitas Connubii, 25.I.2005, art. 11]
Can. 108 §1 Consanguinity is reckoned
by lines and degrees.
§2 In the direct line there are as many degrees as
there are generations, that is, as there are persons, not counting the common
ancestor.
§3 In the collateral line there are as many degrees as
there are persons in both lines together, not counting the common ancestor.
Can. 109 §1 Affinity arises from a
valid marriage, even if not consummated, and it exists between the man and the
blood relations of the woman, and likewise between the woman and the blood
relations of the man.
§2 It is reckoned in such a way that the blood
relations of the man are related by affinity to the woman in the same line and
the same degree, and vice versa.
Can. 110 Children who have been
adopted in accordance with the civil law are considered the children of that
person or those persons who have adopted them.
Can. 111 §1 Through the reception of baptism a child is ascribed to the Latin Church if the parents belong to that Church or, should one of them not belong to it, if both parents agree in choosing that the child be baptised in the Latin Church; but, if the agreement is lacking, the child is ascribed to the Church ‘sui iuris’, to which the father belongs.
§2 However, if only one parent is Catholic, the child is ascribed to the Church to which the Catholic parent belongs.
§3 Any candidate for baptism who has completed the fourteenth year of age may freely choose to be baptised either in the Latin Church or in another Church ‘sui iuris’; in which case the person is ascribed to the Church which he or she has chosen.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter
Codices,
31.V.2016]
Can. 112 §1 After the reception of
baptism, the following are enrolled in another Church sui iuris:
1° one who has obtained permission from the Apostolic
See;
[Such permission is presumed for Latin-rite faithful wishing to join an
Eastern-rite eparchy which is in the same territory, if the two bishops consent
in writing: see Secretariat of State, Rescript
“ex audientia Ss.mi”,
26.XI.1992; however, this does not apply to a transfer to the Latin Church]
2° a spouse who, on entering marriage or during its
course, has declared that he or she is transferring to the Church ‘sui iuris’ of the other spouse; on the dissolution of the
marriage, however, that person may freely return to the Latin Church;
3° the children of those mentioned in nn. 1 and 2 who have not completed their fourteenth year,
and likewise in a mixed marriage the children of a Catholic party who has
lawfully transferred to another Church ‘sui iuris’;
on completion of their fourteenth year, however, they may return to the Latin
Church.
§2 The practice, however long standing, of receiving
the sacraments according to the rite of another Church ‘sui iuris’,
does not bring with it membership of that Church.
§3 Each transfer to another Church ‘sui iuris’ is valid from the moment of the declaration made in the presence of the local ordinary of the said Church or of its pastor or of the priest delegated by one of them and of two witnesses, unless a rescript of the Apostolic See disposes otherwise; and is noted in the baptismal register.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
Can. 113 §1 The Catholic Church and the
Apostolic See have the status of a moral person by divine disposition.
§2 In the Church, besides physical persons, there are
also juridical persons, that is, in canon law subjects of obligations and
rights which accord with their nature.
Can. 114 §1 Aggregates of persons or of
things which are directed to a purpose befitting the Church’s mission, which
transcends the purpose of the individuals, are constituted juridical persons
either by a provision of the law itself or by a special concession given in the
form of a decree by the competent authority.
§2 The purposes indicated in §1 are understood to be
those which concern works of piety, of the apostolate or of charity, whether
spiritual or temporal.
§3 The competent ecclesiastical authority is not to
confer juridical personality except on those aggregates of persons or of things
which aim at a genuinely useful purpose and which, all things considered, have
the means which are foreseen to be sufficient to achieve the purpose in view.
Can. 115 §1 Juridical persons in the
Church are either aggregates of persons or aggregates of things.
§2 An aggregate of persons, which must be made up of
at least three persons, is collegial if the members decide its conduct by
participating together in making its decisions, whether by equal right or not,
in accordance with the law and the statutes; otherwise, it is non‑collegial.
§3 An aggregate of things, or an autonomous
foundation, consists of goods or things, whether spiritual or material, and is
directed, in accordance with the law and the statutes, by one or more physical
persons or by a college.
Can. 116 §1 Public juridical persons
are aggregates of persons or of things which are established by the competent
ecclesiastical authority so that, within the limits allotted to them in the
name of the Church, and in accordance with the provisions of law, they might
fulfil the specific task entrusted to them for the public good. Other juridical
persons are private.
§2 Public juridical persons are given this personality
either by the law itself or by a special decree of the competent authority
expressly granting it. Private juridical persons are given this personality
only by a special decree of the competent authority expressly granting it.
Can. 117 No aggregate of persons or
of things seeking juridical personality can acquire it unless its statutes are
approved by the competent authority.
Can. 118 Those persons represent,
and act in the name of, a public juridical person whose competence to do so is
acknowledged by universal or particular law, or by their own statutes; those
persons represent a private juridical person who are given this competence by
their statutes.
Can. 119 In regard to collegial
acts, unless the law or the statutes provide otherwise:
1° in regard to elections, provided a majority of those who must be summoned are present, what is decided by an absolute majority of those present has the force of law. If there have been two inconclusive scrutinies, a vote is to be taken between the two candidates with the greatest number of votes or, if there are more than two, between the two senior by age. After a third inconclusive scrutiny, that person is deemed elected who is senior by age;
[A relative majority suffices for the third scrutiny: see Authentic
Interpretation of canon 119 1º, 28.VI.1990]
2° in regard to other matters, provided a majority of
those who must be summoned are present, what is decided by an absolute majority
of those present has the force of law. If the votes are equal after two
scrutinies, the person presiding can break the tie with a casting vote;
3° that which affects all as individuals must be
approved by all.
Can. 120 §1 A juridical person is by
its nature perpetual. It ceases to exist, however, if it is lawfully suppressed
by the competent authority, or if it has been inactive for a hundred years. A
private juridical person also ceases to exist if the association itself is
dissolved in accordance with the statutes, or if, in the judgement of the
competent authority, the foundation itself has, in accordance with the
statutes, ceased to exist.
§2 If even a single member of a collegial juridical
person survives, and the aggregate of persons has not, according to the
statutes, ceased to exist, the exercise of all the rights of the aggregate
devolves upon that member.
Can. 121 When aggregates of persons
or of things which are public juridical persons are so amalgamated that one
aggregate, itself with a juridical personality, is formed, this new juridical
person obtains the patrimonial goods and rights which belonged to the previous
aggregates; it also accepts the liabilities of the previous aggregates. In what
concerns particularly the arrangements for the goods and the discharge of
obligations, the wishes of the founders and benefactors, and any acquired
rights must be safeguarded.
Can. 122 When an aggregate which is
a public juridical person is divided in such a way that part of it is joined to
another juridical person or a distinct public juridical person is established
from one part of it, the first obligation is to observe the wishes of the
founders and benefactors, the demands of acquired rights and the requirements
of the approved statutes. Then the competent ecclesiastical authority, either
personally or through an executor, is to ensure:
1° that the divisible common patrimonial goods and
rights, the monies owed and the other liabilities, are divided between the
juridical persons in question in due proportion, in a fashion which is
equitable and right, taking account of all the circumstances and needs of both;
2° that the use and enjoyment of the common goods
which cannot be divided, be given to each juridical person, and also that the
liabilities which are proper to each are the responsibility of each, in due
proportion, in a fashion which is equitable and right.
Can. 123 On the extinction of a
public juridical person, the arrangements for its patrimonial goods and rights,
and for its liabilities, are determined by law and the statutes. If these do
not deal with the matter, the arrangements devolve upon the next higher juridical
person, always with due regard for the wishes of the founders or benefactors
and for acquired rights. On the extinction of a private juridical person, the
arrangements for its goods and liabilities are governed by its own statutes.
Can. 124 §1 For the validity of a
juridical act, it is required that it be performed by a person who is legally
capable, and it must contain those elements which constitute the essence of the
act, as well as the formalities and requirements which the law prescribes for the
validity of the act.
§2 A juridical act which, as far as its external
elements are concerned, is properly performed, is presumed to be valid.
Can. 125 §1 An act is invalid if
performed as a result of force imposed from outside on a person who was quite
unable to resist it.
§2 An act performed as a result of fear which is grave
and unjustly inflicted, or as a result of deceit, is valid, unless the law
provides otherwise. However, it can be rescinded by a court judgement, either
at the instance of the injured party or that party’s successors in law, or ex
officio.
Can. 126 An act is invalid when
performed as a result of ignorance or of error which concerns the substance of
the act, or which amounts to a condition sine qua non; otherwise it is valid,
unless the law provides differently. But an act done as a result of ignorance
or error can give rise to a rescinding action in accordance with the law.
Can. 127 §1 When the law prescribes that, in order to perform a juridical act, a Superior requires the consent or the advice of some college or group of persons, the college or group must be convened in accordance with can. 166, unless, if there is question of seeking advice only, particular or proper law provides otherwise. For the validity of the act, it is required that the consent be obtained of an absolute majority of those present, or that the advice of all be sought.
[The superior does not have the right to vote, even to break a tie: see Authentic
Interpretation of canon 127 §1, 5.VII.1985]
§2 When the law prescribes that, in order to perform a
juridical act, a Superior requires the consent or advice of certain persons as
individuals:
1° if consent is required, the Superior’s act is
invalid if the Superior does not seek the consent of those persons, or acts
against the vote of all or of any of them;
2° if advice is
required, the Superior’s act is invalid if the Superior does not hear those
persons. The Superior is not in any way bound to accept their vote, even if it
is unanimous; nevertheless, without what is, in his or her judgement, an
overriding reason, the Superior is not to act against their vote, especially if
it is a unanimous one.
[See the Final Document of the XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, 24.XI.2024, no. 91]
§3 All whose consent or advice is required are obliged
to give their opinions sincerely. If the seriousness of the matter requires it,
they are obliged carefully to maintain secrecy, and the Superior can insist on
this obligation.
Can. 128 Whoever unlawfully causes
harm to another by a juridical act, or indeed by any other act which is
deceitful or culpable, is obliged to repair the damage done.
[The Lex propria of the
Apostolic Signatura introduces a procedure for obtaining damages for wrongful
decisions of ecclesiastical authorities: see m.p. Antiqua
ordinatione, 11.VI.2008, arts. 101-103]
Can. 129 §1 Those who are in sacred
orders are, in accordance with the provisions of law, capable of the power of
governance, which belongs to the Church by divine institution. This power is
also called the power of jurisdiction.
§2 Lay members of Christ’s faithful can cooperate in
the exercise of this same power in accordance with the law.
Can. 130 Of itself the power of
governance is exercised for the external forum; sometimes however it is
exercised for the internal forum only, but in such a way that the effects which
its exercise is designed to have in the external forum are not acknowledged in
that forum, except in so far as the law prescribes this for determinate cases.
Can. 131 §1 Ordinary power of
governance is that which by virtue of the law itself is attached to a given
office; delegated power is that which is granted to a person other than through
an office.
§2 Ordinary power of governance may be proper or
vicarious.
§3 One who claims to have been delegated has the onus
of proving the delegation.
Can. 132 §1 Habitual faculties are
governed by the provisions concerning delegated power.
§2 However, unless the grant has expressly provided
otherwise, or the Ordinary was deliberately chosen as the only one to exercise
the faculty, an habitual faculty granted to an Ordinary does not lapse on the
expiry of the authority of the Ordinary to whom it was given, even if he has
already begun to exercise the faculty, but it passes to the Ordinary who
succeeds him in governance.
Can. 133 §1 A delegate who exceeds the
limits of the mandate, with regard either to things or to persons, performs no
act at all.
§2 A delegate is not considered to have exceeded the
mandate when what was delegated is carried out, but in a manner different to
that determined in the mandate, unless the manner was prescribed for validity
by the delegating authority.
Can. 134 §1 In law the term Ordinary
means, apart from the Roman Pontiff, diocesan Bishops and all who, even for a
time only, are set over a particular Church or a community equivalent to it in
accordance with can. 368, and those who in these have general ordinary executive
power, that is, Vicars general and episcopal Vicars; likewise, for their own
members, it means the major Superiors of clerical religious institutes of
pontifical right and of clerical societies of apostolic life of pontifical
right, who have at least ordinary executive power.
§2 The term local Ordinary means all those enumerated
in §1, except Superiors of religious institutes and of societies of apostolic
life.
§3 Whatever in the canons, in the context of executive
power, is attributed to the diocesan Bishop, is understood to belong only to
the diocesan Bishop and to those others in can. 381 §2 who are equivalent to
him, to the exclusion of the Vicar general and the episcopal Vicar except by
special mandate.
Can. 135 §1 The power of governance is
divided into legislative, executive and judicial power.
§2 Legislative power is to be exercised in the manner
prescribed by law; that which in the Church a legislator lower than the supreme
authority has cannot be delegated, unless the law explicitly provides
otherwise. A lower legislator cannot validly make a law which is contrary to
that of a higher legislator.
[Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022, art. 30, states that a curial institution
cannot issue laws or general decrees having the force of law, nor can it
derogate from the prescriptions of the current universal law, except in
individual and particular cases, and with the approval of the Roman Pontiff in
forma specifica]
§3 Judicial power, which is possessed by judges and
judicial colleges, is to be exercised in the manner prescribed by law, and it
cannot be delegated except for the performance of acts preparatory to some
decree or judgement.
[Dignitas connubii,
art. 32 §2, states that judicial power is to be exercised in one’s proper
territory, except in the case of can. 1469 §1]
§4 As far as the exercise of executive power is
concerned, the provisions of the following canons are to be observed.
Can. 136 Persons may exercise
executive power over their subjects, even when either they themselves or their
subjects are outside the territory, unless it is otherwise clear from the
nature of things or from the provisions of law. They can exercise this power over
peregrini
who are actually living in the territory, if it is a question of granting
favours, or of executing universal or particular laws by which the peregrini are
bound in accordance with can. 13 §2, n. 2.
Can. 137 §1 Ordinary executive power
can be delegated either for an individual case or for all cases, unless the law
expressly provides otherwise.
§2 Executive power delegated by the Apostolic See can
be subdelegated, either for an individual case or for all cases, unless the
delegation was deliberately given to the individual alone, or unless subdelegation was expressly prohibited.
§3 Executive power delegated by another authority
having ordinary power, if delegated for all cases, can be subdelegated only for
individual cases; if delegated for a determinate act or acts, it cannot be
subdelegated, except by the express grant of the person delegating.
§4 No subdelegated power can again be subdelegated,
unless this was expressly granted by the person delegating.
Can. 138 Ordinary executive power,
and power delegated for all cases, are to be interpreted widely; any other
power is to be interpreted strictly. Delegation of power to a person is
understood to include everything necessary for the exercise of that power.
Can. 139 §1 Unless the law prescribes
otherwise, the tact that a person approaches some competent authority, even a
higher one, does not mean that the executive power of another competent
authority is suspended, whether that be ordinary or delegated.
§2 A lower authority, however, is not to interfere in
cases referred to higher authority, except for a grave and urgent reason; in
which case the higher authority is to be notified immediately.
Can. 140 §1 When several people are
together delegated to act in the same matter, the person who has begun to deal
with it excludes the others from acting, unless that person is subsequently
impeded, or does not wish to proceed further with the matter.
§2 When several people are delegated to act as a
college in a certain matter, all must proceed in accordance with can. 119,
unless the mandate provides otherwise.
§3 Executive power delegated to several people is
presumed to be delegated to them together.
Can. 141 If several people are
successively delegated, that person is to deal with the matter whose mandate
was the earlier and was not subsequently revoked.
Can. 142 §1 Delegated power lapses: on
the completion of the mandate; on the expiry of the time or the completion of
the number of cases for which it was granted; on the cessation of the
motivating reason for the delegation; on its revocation by the person delegating,
when communicated directly to the person delegated; and on the retirement of
the person delegated, when communicated to and accepted by the person
delegating. It does not lapse on the expiry of the authority of the person
delegating, unless this appears from clauses attached to it.
§2 An act of delegated power exercised for the
internal forum only, which is inadvertently performed after the time limit of
the delegation, is valid.
Can. 143 §1 Ordinary power ceases on
the loss of the office to which it is attached.
§2 Unless the law provides otherwise, ordinary power
is suspended if an appeal or a recourse is lawfully made against a deprivation
of, or removal from, office.
Can. 144 §1 In common error, whether of
fact or of law, and in positive and probable doubt, whether of law or of fact,
the Church supplies executive power of governance for both the external and the
internal forum.
§2 The same norm applies to the faculties mentioned in
cann. 883, 966, and 1111 §1.
Can. 145 §1 An ecclesiastical office is
any post which by divine or ecclesiastical disposition is established in a
stable manner to further a spiritual purpose.
§2 The duties and rights proper to each ecclesiastical
office are defined either by the law whereby the office is established, or by a
decree of the competent authority whereby it is at one and at the same time
established and conferred.
Can. 146 An ecclesiastical office
cannot be validly obtained without canonical provision.
Can. 147 The provision of an
ecclesiastical office is effected: by its being freely conferred by the
competent ecclesiastical authority; by appointment made by the same authority,
where there has been a prior presentation; by confirmation or admission by the
same authority, where there has been a prior election or postulation; finally,
by a simple election and acceptance of the election, if the election does not
require confirmation.
Can. 148 Unless the law provides
otherwise, the provision of an office is the prerogative of the authority which
is competent to establish, change or suppress the office.
Can. 149 §1 In order to be promoted to
an ecclesiastical office, one must be in communion with the Church, and be
suitable, that is, possessed of those qualities which are required for that
office by universal or particular law or by the law of the foundation.
§2 The provision of an ecclesiastical office to a
person who lacks the requisite qualities is invalid only if the qualities are
expressly required for validity by universal or particular law or by the law of
the foundation; otherwise it is valid, but it can be rescinded by a decree of
the competent authority or by a judgement of an administrative tribunal.
§3 The provision of an office made as a result of
simony, is invalid by virtue of the law itself.
Can. 150 An office which carries
with it the full care of souls, for which the exercise of the order of
priesthood is required, cannot validly be conferred upon a person who is not
yet a priest.
Can. 151 The provision of an office
which carries with it the care of souls is not to be deferred without grave
reason.
Can. 152 Two or more offices which
are incompatible, that is, which cannot be exercised at the same time by the
same person, are not to be conferred upon anyone.
Can. 153 §1 The provision of an office
which in law is not vacant is by that very fact invalid, nor does it become
valid by subsequent vacancy.
§2 If, however, there is question of an office which
by law is conferred for a determinate time, provision can be made within six
months before the expiry of this time, and it takes effect from the day the
office falls vacant.
§3 The promise of any office, by whomsoever it is
made, has no juridical effect.
Can. 154 An office which in law is
vacant, but which someone unlawfully still holds, may be conferred, provided
that it has been properly declared that such possession is not lawful, and that
mention is made of this declaration in the letter of conferral.
Can. 155 One who confers an office
in the place of another who is negligent or impeded, does not thereby acquire
any power over the person on whom the office is conferred; the juridical
condition of the latter is the same as if the provision of the office had been
carried out in accordance with the ordinary norm of law.
Can. 156 The provision of any office
is to be made in writing.
Can. 157 Unless the law expressly
states otherwise, it is the prerogative of the diocesan Bishop to make
appointments to ecclesiastical offices in his own particular Church by free
conferral.
Can. 158 §1 Presentation to an
ecclesiastical office by a person having the right of presentation must be made
to the authority who is competent to make an appointment to the office in
question; unless it is otherwise lawfully provided, presentation is to be made
within three months of receiving notification of the vacancy of the office.
§2 If the right of presentation belongs to a college
or group of persons, the person to be presented is to be designated according
to the provisions of cann. 165‑179.
Can. 159 No one is to be presented
who is unwilling. Accordingly, one who is proposed for presentation must be
consulted, and may be presented if within eight canonical days a refusal is not
entered.
Can. 160 §1 One who has the right of
presentation may present one or more persons, either simultaneously or
successively.
§2 No persons may present themselves. However a
college or a group of persons may present one of its members.
Can. 161 §1 Unless the law prescribes
otherwise, one who has presented a person who is judged unsuitable, may within
a month present another candidate, but once only.
§2 If before the appointment is made the person
presented has withdrawn or has died, the one with the right of presentation may
exercise this right again, within a month of receiving notice of the withdrawal
or of the death.
Can. 162 A person who has not
presented anyone within the canonical time prescribed by can. 158 §1 and can.
161, or who has twice presented a candidate judged to be unsuitable, loses the
right of presentation for that case. The authority who is competent to appoint
may then freely provide for the vacant office, but with the consent of the
proper Ordinary of the person appointed.
Can. 163 The authority to whom, in
accordance with the law, it belongs to appoint one who is presented, is to
appoint the person lawfully presented whom he has judged suitable, and who has
accepted. If a number lawfully presented are judged suitable, he is to appoint
one of them.
Can. 164 Unless it has been
otherwise provided in the law, the provisions of the following canons are to be
observed in canonical elections.
Can. 165 Unless it is otherwise
provided in the law or in the statutes of the college or group, if a college or
a group of persons enjoys the right to elect to an office, the election is not
to be deferred beyond three canonical months, to be reckoned from the receipt
of notification of the vacancy of the office. If the election does not take
place within that time, the ecclesiastical authority who has the right of
confirming the election or the right to make provision otherwise, is freely to
provide for the vacant office.
Can. 166 §1 The one who presides over
the college or group is to summon all those who belong to the college or group.
When it has to be personal, the summons is valid if it is made in the place of
domicile or quasi‑domicile or in the place of residence.
§2 If someone who should have been summoned was
overlooked and was therefore absent, the election is valid. However, if that
person insists and gives proof of being overlooked and of absence, the
election, even if confirmed, must be rescinded by the competent authority,
provided it is juridically established that the recourse was submitted within
no more than three days of having received notification of the election.
§3 If more than one third of the voters were
overlooked, the election is invalid by virtue of the law itself, unless all
those overlooked were in fact present.
Can. 167 §1 When the summons has been
lawfully made, those who are present on the day and in the place specified in
the summons have the right to vote. Unless it is otherwise lawfully provided in
the statutes, votes cast by letter or by proxy cannot be admitted.
§2 If an elector is present in the building in
which the election is being held, but because of infirmity is unable to be
present at the election, a written vote is to be sought from that person by the
scrutineers.
Can. 168 Even if someone has a right
to vote in his or her own name by reason of a number of titles, that person may
cast only one vote.
Can. 169 In order that an election
be valid, no one may be allowed to vote who does not belong to the college or
group.
Can. 170 If the freedom
of an election has in any way been in fact impeded, the election is invalid by
virtue of the law itself.
[See the offence specified in can. 1372, 2°]
Can. 171 §1 The following are legally
incapable of casting a vote:
1° one incapable of a human act;
2° one lacking active voice;
3° one who is excommunicated, whether by judgement of
a court or by a decree whereby this penalty is imposed or declared;
4° one who notoriously defected from communion with
the Church.
§2 If any of the above persons is admitted, the vote
cast is invalid. The election, however, is valid, unless it is established
that, without this vote, the person elected would not have gained the requisite
number of votes.
Can. 172 §1 For a vote to be valid, it
must be:
1° free; a vote is therefore invalid if, through grave
fear or deceit, someone was directly or indirectly made to choose a certain
person or several persons separately;
2° secret, certain, absolute and determinate.
§2 Conditions attached to a vote before an election
are to be considered non‑existent.
Can. 173 §1 Before an election begins,
at least two scrutineers are to be appointed from among the college or group.
§2 The scrutineers are to collect the votes and, in
the presence of the one who presides at the election, to check whether the
number of votes corresponds to the number of electors; they are then to examine
the votes and to announce how many each person has received.
§3 If the number of votes exceeds the number of
electors, the act is null.
§4 All the proceedings of an election are to be
accurately recorded by the one who acts as notary. They are to be signed at
least by that notary, by the person who presides and by the scrutineers, and
they are to be carefully preserved in the archive of the college.
Can. 174 §1 Unless the law or the
statutes provide otherwise, an election can be made by compromise, that is the
electors by unanimous and written consent transfer the right of election for
this occasion to one or more suitable persons, whether they belong to the college
or are outside it, who in virtue of this authority are to elect in the name of
all.
§2 If the college or group consists solely of clerics,
the persons to whom the power of election is transferred must be in sacred
orders; otherwise the election is invalid.
§3 Those to whom the power of election is transferred
must observe the provisions of law concerning an election and, for the validity
of the election, they must observe the conditions attached to the compromise,
unless these conditions are contrary to the law. Conditions which are contrary
to the law are to be regarded as non‑existent.
Can. 175 A compromise ceases, and
the right to vote reverts to those who transferred it, when:
1° it is revoked by the college or group before it has
been put into effect;
2° a condition attached to the compromise has not been
fulfilled;
3° the election has been held, but invalidly.
Can. 176 Unless it is otherwise
provided in the law or the statutes, the person who has received the requisite
number of votes in accordance with can. 119, n. 1, is deemed elected and is to
be proclaimed by the person who presides over the college or group.
Can. 177 §1 The election is to be
notified immediately to the person elected who must, within eight canonical
days from the receipt of notification of the election, intimate to the person
who presides over the college or group whether or not he or she accepts the election;
otherwise, the election has no effect.
§2 The person elected who has not accepted loses every
right deriving from the election, nor is any right revived by subsequent
acceptance; the person may, however, be elected again. The college or group
must proceed to a new election within a month of being notified of non‑acceptance.
Can. 178 If the election does not
require confirmation, by accepting the election the person elected immediately
obtains the office with all its rights; otherwise, he or she acquires only a
right to the office.
Can. 179 §1 If the election requires
confirmation, the person elected must, either personally or through another,
ask for confirmation by the competent authority within eight canonical days of
acceptance of the office; otherwise that person is deprived of every right,
unless he or she has established that there was just reason which prevented
confirmation being sought.
§2 The competent authority cannot refuse confirmation
if he has found the person elected suitable in accordance with can. 149 §1, and
the election has been carried out in accordance with the law.
§3 Confirmation must be given in writing.
§4 Before receiving notice of the confirmation, the
person elected may not become involved in the administration of the office,
neither in spiritual nor in material affairs; any acts possibly performed by
that person are invalid.
§5 When confirmation has been notified, the person
elected obtains full right to the office, unless the law provides otherwise.
Can. 180 §1 If a canonical impediment,
from which a dispensation is possible and customary, stands in the way of the
election of a person whom the electors judge more suitable and prefer, they
can, unless the law provides otherwise, postulate that person from the competent
authority.
§2 Those to whom the power of electing has been
transferred by compromise may not make a postulation, unless this is expressly
stated in the terms of the compromise.
Can. 181 §1 For a postulation to have
effect, at least two thirds of the votes are required.
§2 A vote for postulation must be expressed by the
term ‘I postulate’, or an equivalent. The formula ‘I elect or postulate’, or
its equivalent, is valid for election if there is no impediment; otherwise, it
is valid for postulation.
Can. 182 §1 The postulation must be
sent, within eight canonical days, by the person who presides to the authority
which is competent to confirm the election, to whom it belongs to grant the
dispensation from the impediment or, if he has not this authority, to seek the
dispensation from a superior authority. If confirmation is not required, the
postulation must be sent to the authority which is competent to grant the
dispensation.
§2 If the postulation is not forwarded within the
prescribed time, it is by that very fact invalid, and the college or group is
for that occasion deprived of the right of election or of postulation, unless
it is proved that the person presiding was prevented by a just impediment from
forwarding the postulation, or did not do so in due time because of deceit or
negligence.
§3 The person postulated does not acquire any right
from the postulation; the competent authority is not obliged to admit the
postulation.
§4 The electors may not revoke a postulation made to
the competent authority, except with the consent of that authority.
Can. 183 §1 If a postulation is not
admitted by the competent authority the right of election reverts to the
college or group.
§2 If the postulation has been admitted, this is to be
notified to the person postulated, who must reply in accordance with can. 177
§1.
§3 The person who accepts a postulation which has been
admitted immediately obtains full right to the office.
Can. 184 §1 An ecclesiastical office is
lost on the expiry of a predetermined time; on reaching the age limit defined
by law; by resignation; by transfer; by removal; by deprivation.
§2 An ecclesiastical office is not lost on the expiry,
in whatever way, of the authority of the one by whom it was conferred, unless
the law provides otherwise.
§3 The loss of an office, once it has taken effect, is
to be notified as soon as possible to those who have any right in regard to the
provision of the office.
Can. 185 The title ‘emeritus’ may be
conferred on one who loses office by reason of age, or of resignation which has
been accepted.
Can. 186 Loss of office by reason of
the expiry of a predetermined time or of reaching the age limit, has effect
only from the moment that this is communicated in writing by the competent
authority.
Can. 187 Anyone who is capable of
personal responsibility can resign from an ecclesiastical office for a just
reason.
Can. 188 A resignation which is made
as a result of grave fear unjustly inflicted, or of deceit, or of substantial
error, or of simony, is invalid by virtue of the law itself.
Can. 189 §1 For a resignation to be
valid, whether it requires acceptance or not, it must be made to the authority
which is competent to provide for the office in question, and it must be made
either in writing, or orally before two witnesses.
§2 The authority is not to accept a resignation which
is not based on a just and proportionate reason.
§3 A resignation which requires acceptance has no force unless it is accepted within three months. One which does not require acceptance takes effect when the person resigning communicates it in accordance with the law.
[The m.p. Learn to take your leave,
12.II.2018, art. 5, abrogates the three-month term in the case of renunciation
for reasons of age of the titles of some offices of pontifical appointment (cf.
can. 401)]
§4 Until a resignation takes effect, it can be revoked
by the person resigning. Once it has taken effect, it cannot be revoked, but
the person who resigned can obtain the office on the basis of another title.
Can. 190 §1 A transfer can be made only
by the person who has the right to provide both for the office which is lost
and at the same time for the office which is being conferred.
§2 A grave reason is required if a transfer is made
against the will of the holder of an office and, always without prejudice to
the right to present reasons against the transfer, the procedure prescribed by
law is to be observed.
§3 For a transfer to have effect, it must be notified
in writing.
Can. 191 §1 In the process of transfer,
the first office is vacated by the taking of canonical possession of the other
office, unless the law or the competent authority has prescribed otherwise.
§2 The person transferred receives the remuneration
attached to the previous office until the moment of obtaining canonical
possession of the other office.
Can. 192 One is removed from office
either by a decree of the competent authority lawfully issued, observing of
course the rights possibly acquired from a contract, or by virtue of the law in
accordance with can. 194.
Can. 193 §1 No one may be removed from
an office which is conferred on a person for an indeterminate time, except for
grave reasons and in accordance with the procedure defined by law.
§2 This also applies to the removal from office before
time of a person on whom an office is conferred for a determinate time, without
prejudice to can. 624 §3.
§3 When in accordance with the provisions of law an
office is conferred upon someone at the prudent discretion of the competent
authority, that person may, upon the judgement of the same authority, be
removed from the office for a just reason.
§4 For a decree of removal to be effective, it must be
notified in writing.
Can. 194 §1 The following are removed
from ecclesiastical office by virtue of the law itself:
1° one who has lost the clerical state;
2° one who has publicly defected from the Catholic
faith or from communion with the Church;
3° a cleric who has attempted marriage, even a civil
one.
§2 The removal mentioned in nn.
2 and 3 can be insisted upon only if it is established by a declaration of the
competent authority.
Can. 195 If by a decree of the
competent authority, and not by the law itself, someone is removed from an
office on which that person’s livelihood depends, the same authority is to
ensure that the person’s livelihood is secure for an appropriate time, unless
this has been provided for in some other way.
Can. 196 §1 Deprivation of office, that
is, as a punishment for an offence, may be effected only in accordance with the
law.
§2 Deprivation takes effect in accordance with the
provisions of the canons concerning penal law.
Can. 197 Prescription, as a means of
acquiring or of losing a subjective right, or as a means of freeing oneself
from obligations, is, apart from the exceptions prescribed in the canons of
this Code, accepted by the Church in the manner in which it is adopted in the
civil legislation of each country.
Can. 198 No prescription is valid
unless it is based on good faith, not only in its beginning, but throughout the
whole time required for the prescription, without prejudice to can. 1362.
Can. 199 The following are not
affected by prescription:
1° rights and obligations which are of divine law,
whether natural or positive;
2° rights which can be obtained only by apostolic
privilege;
3° rights and obligations which bear directly on the
spiritual life of Christ’s faithful;
4° the certain and undisputed boundaries of
ecclesiastical territories;
5° Mass offerings and obligations;
6° the provision of an ecclesiastical office which, in
accordance with the law, requires the exercise of a sacred order;
7° the right of visitation and the obligation of
obedience, so that Christ’s faithful could not be visited by an ecclesiastical
authority and would no longer be subject to any authority.
Can. 200 Unless the law provides
otherwise, time is to be reckoned in accordance with the following canons.
Can. 201 §1 Continuous time means
unbroken time.
§2 Canonical time is time which a person can so use to
exercise or to pursue a right that it does not run when one is unaware, or when
one is unable to act.
Can. 202 §1 In law, a day is understood
to be a space of twenty‑four hours, to be reckoned continuously and,
unless expressly provided otherwise, it begins at midnight; a week is a space
of seven days; a month is a space of thirty days, and a year a space of three
hundred and sixty‑five days, unless it is stated that the month and the
year are to be taken as in the calendar.
§2 If time is continuous, the month and the year are
always to be taken as in the calendar.
Can. 203 §1 The first day is not to be
counted in the total, unless its beginning coincides with the beginning of the
day, or unless the law expressly provides otherwise.
§2 Unless the contrary is prescribed, the final day is
to be reckoned within the total; if the total time is one or more months, one
or more years, one or more weeks, it finishes on completion of the last day
bearing the same number or, if the month does not have the same number, on the
completion of the last day of that month
Can. 204 §1 Christ’s faithful are those
who, since they are incorporated into Christ through baptism, are constituted
the people of God. For this reason they participate in their own way in the
priestly, prophetic and kingly office of Christ. They are called, each according
to his or her particular condition, to exercise the mission which God entrusted
to the Church to fulfil in the world.
§2 This Church, established and ordered in this world
as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, governed by the successor of
Peter and the Bishops in communion with him.
Can. 205 Those baptised are in full
communion with the Catholic Church here on earth who are joined with Christ in
his visible body, through the bonds of profession of faith, the sacraments and
ecclesiastical governance.
Can. 206 §1 Catechumens are linked with
the Church in a special way since, moved by the Holy Spirit, they are
expressing an explicit desire to be incorporated in the Church. By this very
desire, as well as by the life of faith, hope and charity which they lead, they
are joined to the Church which already cherishes them as its own.
§2 The Church has a special care for catechumens.
While it invites them to lead an evangelical life, and introduces them to the
celebration of the sacred rites, it already accords them various prerogatives
which are proper to Christians.
Can. 207 §1 By divine institution,
among Christ’s faithful there are in the Church sacred ministers, who in law
are also called clerics; the others are called lay people.
§2 Drawn from both groups are those of Christ’s
faithful who, professing the evangelical counsels through vows or other sacred
bonds recognised and approved by the Church, are consecrated to God in their
own special way and promote the salvific mission of the Church. Their state,
although it does not belong to the hierarchical structure of the Church, does
pertain to its life and holiness.
Can. 208 Flowing from their rebirth
in Christ, there is a genuine equality of dignity and action among all of
Christ’s faithful. Because of this equality they all contribute, each according
to his or her own condition and office, to the building up of the Body of
Christ.
Can. 209 §1 Christ’s faithful are bound
to preserve their communion with the Church at all times, even in their
external actions.
§2 They are to carry out with great diligence their
responsibilities towards both the universal Church and the particular Church to
which by law they belong.
Can. 210 All Christ’s faithful, each
according to his or her own condition, must make a wholehearted effort to lead
a holy life, and to promote the growth of the Church and its continual
sanctification.
Can. 211 All Christ’s faithful have
the obligation and the right to strive so that the divine message of salvation
may more and more reach all people of all times and all places.
Can. 212 §1 Christ’s faithful,
conscious of their own responsibility, are bound to show Christian obedience to
what the sacred Pastors, who represent Christ, declare as teachers of the faith
and prescribe as rulers of the Church.
§2 Christ’s faithful are at liberty to make known
their needs, especially their spiritual needs, and their wishes to the Pastors
of the Church.
§3 They have the right, indeed at times the duty, in
keeping with their knowledge, competence and position, to manifest to the
sacred Pastors their views on matters which concern the good of the Church.
They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ’s
faithful, but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and
morals, show due reverence to the Pastors and take into account both the common
good and the dignity of individuals.
Can. 213 Christ’s faithful have the
right to be assisted by their Pastors from the spiritual riches of the Church,
especially by the word of God and the sacraments.
Can. 214 Christ’s faithful have the
right to worship God according to the provisions of their own rite approved by
the lawful Pastors of the Church; they also have the right to follow their own
form of spiritual life, provided it is in accord with Church teaching.
Can. 215 Christ’s faithful may
freely establish and direct associations which serve charitable or pious
purposes or which foster the Christian vocation in the world, and they may hold
meetings to pursue these purposes by common effort.
Can. 216 Since they share the
Church’s mission, all Christ’s faithful have the right to promote and support
apostolic action, by their own initiative, undertaken according to their state
and condition. No initiative, however, can lay claim to the title ‘Catholic’
without the consent of the competent ecclesiastical authority.
[Consent is similarly required from the Holy See for the use of the
title “pontifical” and for using other elements concerning the person or office
of the Holy Father: see Secretary of State,
Declaratio ad Summi Pontificis dignitatem tuendam, 19.XII.2009, Acta Apostolicae Sedis, vol. 102, no. 1, p. 59]
Can. 217 Since Christ’s faithful are
called by baptism to lead a life in harmony with the gospel teaching, they have
the right to a Christian education, which genuinely teaches them to strive for
the maturity of the human person and at the same time to know and live the
mystery of salvation.
Can. 218 Those who are engaged in
fields of sacred study have a just freedom to research matters in which they
are expert and to express themselves prudently concerning them, with due
allegiance to the magisterium of the
Church.
Can. 219 All Christ’s faithful have
the right to immunity from any kind of coercion in choosing a state in life.
Can. 220 No one may unlawfully harm
the good reputation which a person enjoys, or violate the right of every person
to protect his or her privacy.
Can. 221 §1 Christ’s faithful may
lawfully vindicate and defend the rights they enjoy in the Church, before the
competent ecclesiastical forum in accordance with the law.
§2 If any members of Christ’s faithful are summoned to
trial by the competent authority, they have the right to be judged according to
the provisions of the law, to be applied with equity.
§3 Christ’s faithful have the right that no canonical
penalties be inflicted upon them except in accordance with the law.
Can. 222 §1 Christ’s faithful have the
obligation to provide for the needs of the Church, so that the Church has
available to it those things which are necessary for divine worship, for
apostolic and charitable work and for the worthy support of its ministers.
§2 They are also obliged to promote social justice
and, mindful of the Lord’s precept, to help the poor from their own resources.
Can. 223 §1 In exercising their rights,
Christ’s faithful, both individually and in associations, must take account of
the common good of the Church, as well as the rights of others and their own
duties to others.
§2 Ecclesiastical authority is entitled to regulate,
in view of the common good, the exercise of rights which are proper to Christ’s
faithful.
[See Dicastery for Legislative Texts, Explanatory
Note, 8.XII.2010, which states that this norm is not to be invoked to limit
the exercise of rights in individual cases, since other procedures exist for
such purposes]
Can. 224 Lay members of Christ’s
faithful have the duties and rights enumerated in the canons of this title, in
addition to those duties and rights which are common to all Christ’s faithful
and those stated in other canons.
Can. 225 §1 Since lay people, like all
Christ’s faithful, are deputed to the apostolate by baptism and confirmation,
they are bound by the general obligation and they have the right, whether as
individuals or in associations, to strive so that the divine message of
salvation may be known and accepted by all people throughout the world. This
obligation is all the more insistent in circumstances in which only through
them are people able to hear the Gospel and to know Christ.
§2 They have also, according to the condition of each,
the special obligation to permeate and perfect the temporal order of things
with the spirit of the Gospel. In this way, particularly in conducting secular
business and exercising secular functions, they are to give witness to Christ.
Can. 226 §1 Those who are married are
bound by the special obligation, in accordance with their own vocation, to
strive for the building up of the people of God through their marriage and
family.
§2 Because they gave life to their children, parents
have the most serious obligation and the right to educate them. It is therefore
primarily the responsibility of Christian parents to ensure the Christian
education of their children in accordance with the teaching of the Church.
Can. 227 To lay members of Christ’s
faithful belongs the right to have acknowledged as theirs that freedom in
secular affairs which is common to all citizens. In using this freedom,
however, they are to ensure that their actions are permeated with the spirit of
the Gospel, and they are to heed the teaching of the Church proposed by the magisterium, but they must be on guard,
in questions of opinion, against proposing their own view as the teaching of
the Church.
Can. 228 §1 Lay people who are found to
be suitable are capable of being admitted by the sacred Pastors to those
ecclesiastical offices and functions which, in accordance with the provisions
of law, they can discharge.
§2 Lay people who are outstanding in the requisite knowledge, prudence and integrity, are capable of being experts or advisers, even in councils in accordance with the law, in order to provide assistance to the Pastors of the Church.
[See m.p. Antiquum ministerium, 10.V.2021, instituting
the ministry of catechist]
Can. 229 §1 Lay people have the duty
and the right to acquire the knowledge of Christian teaching which is
appropriate to each one’s capacity and condition, so that they may be able to
live according to this teaching, to proclaim it and if necessary to defend it,
and may be capable of playing their part in the exercise of the apostolate.
§2 They also have the right to acquire that fuller
knowledge of the sacred sciences which is taught in ecclesiastical universities
or faculties or in institutes of religious sciences, attending lectures there
and acquiring academic degrees.
§3 Likewise, assuming that the provisions concerning
the requisite suitability have been observed, they are capable of receiving
from the lawful ecclesiastical authority a mandate to teach the sacred
sciences.
Can. 230 §1 Lay persons who possess the age and qualifications established by decree of the conference of bishops can be admitted on a stable basis through the prescribed liturgical rite to the ministries of lector and acolyte. Nevertheless, the conferral of these ministries does not grant them the right to obtain support or remuneration from the Church.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Spiritus Domini, 10.I.2021]
§2 Lay people can receive a temporary assignment to the role of lector in liturgical actions. Likewise, all lay people can exercise the roles of commentator, cantor or other such, in accordance with the law.
[See Authentic
Interpretation of canon 230 §2, 11.VII.1992, confirming that females may be
altar servers; however, a bishop may not oblige his priests to use female altar
servers: see Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the
Sacraments, Response to dubium, 27.VII.2001]
§3 Where the needs of the Church require and ministers
are not available, lay people, even though they are not lectors or acolytes,
can supply certain of their functions, that is, exercise the ministry of the
word, preside over liturgical prayers, confer baptism and distribute Holy
Communion, in accordance with the provisions of the law.
[Extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion may not exercise their
function if ordinary ministers are present and are not impeded: see Authentic
Interpretation of canon 910 §2, 1.VI.1988]
Can. 231 §1 Lay people who are pledged
to the special service of the Church, whether permanently or for a time, have a
duty to acquire the appropriate formation which their role demands, so that
they may conscientiously, earnestly and diligently fulfil this role.
§2 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 230 §1,
they have the right to a worthy remuneration befitting their condition,
whereby, with due regard also to the provisions of the civil law, they can
becomingly provide for their own needs and the needs of their families.
Likewise, they have the right to have their insurance, social security and
medical benefits duly safeguarded.
Can. 232 It is the duty and the
proper and exclusive right of the Church to train those who are deputed to
sacred ministries.
Can. 233 §1 It is the duty of the whole
Christian community to foster vocations so that the needs of the sacred
ministry are sufficiently met in the entire Church. In particular, this duty
binds Christian families, educa tors and, in a
special way, priests, especially parish priests. DiocesanBishops,
who must show the greatest concern to promote vocations, are to instruct the
people entrusted to them on the importance of the sacred ministry and the need
for ministers in the Church. They are to encourage and support initiatives to
promote vocations, especially movements established for this purpose.
§2 Moreover, priests and especially diocesan Bishops
are to be solicitous that men of more mature years who believe they are called
to the sacred ministries are prudently assisted by word and deed and are duly
prepared.
Can. 234 §1 Minor seminaries and other
institutions of a similar nature promote vocations by providing a special
religious formation, allied to human and scientific education; where they
exist, they are to be retained and fostered. Indeed, where the diocesan Bishop
considers it expedient, he is to provide for the establishment of a minor
seminary or similar institution.
§2 Unless the circumstances of certain situations
suggest otherwise, young men who aspire to the priesthood are to receive that
same human and scientific formation which prepares their peers in their region
for higher studies.
Can. 235 §1 Young men who intend to
become priests are to receive the appropriate religious formation and
instruction in the duties proper to the priesthood in a major seminary, for the
whole of the time of formation or, if in the judgement of the diocesan Bishop circumstances
require it, for at least four years.
§2 Those who lawfully reside outside the seminary are
to be entrusted by the diocesan Bishop to a devout and suitable priest, who
will ensure that they are carefully formed in the spiritual life and in
discipline.
Can. 236 Those who aspire to the
permanent diaconate are to be formed in the spiritual life and appropriately
instructed in the fulfilment of the duties proper to that order, in accordance
with the provisions made by the Episcopal Conference:
1° young men are to reside for at least three years in
a special houseunless the diocesan Bishop for grave
reasons decides otherwise,
2° men of more mature years, whether celibate or
married, are toprepare for three years in a manner
determined by the same Episcopal Conference.
Can. 237 §1 Where it is possible and
advisable, each diocese is to have a major seminary; otherwise, students
preparing for the sacred ministries are to be sent to the seminary of another
diocese, or an inter‑diocesan seminary is to be established.
§2 An interdiocesan seminary is not to be erected unless the conference of bishops, if the seminary is for its entire territory, or the bishops involved have obtained the prior confirmation of the Apostolic See for both the erection of the seminary and its statutes.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
Can. 238 §1 Seminaries which are
lawfully established have juridical personality in the Church by virtue of the
law itself.
§2 In the conduct of all its affairs, the rector acts
in the person of the seminary, unless for certain matters the competent
authority has prescribed otherwise.
Can. 239 §1 In all seminaries there is
to be a rector who presides over it, a vice‑rector, if circumstances
warrant this, and a financial administrator. Moreover, if the students follow
their studies in the seminary, there are to be professors who teach the various
subjects in a manner suitably coordinated between them.
§2 In every seminary there is to be at least one
spiritual director, though the students are also free to approach other priests
who have been deputed to this work by the Bishop.
§3 The seminary statutes are to determine the manner
in which the other moderators, the professors and indeed the students
themselves, are to participate in the rector’s responsibility, especially in
regard to the maintenance of discipline.
Can. 240 §1 Besides ordinary confessors,
other confessors are to come regularly to the seminary; while maintaining
seminary discipline, the students are always to be free to approach any
confessor, whether inside or outside the seminary.
§2 In deciding about the admission of students to
orders, or their dismissal from the seminary, the vote of the spiritual
director and the confessors may never be sought.
Can. 241 §1 The diocesan Bishop is to
admit to the major seminary only those whose human, moral, spiritual and
intellectual gifts, as well as physical and psychological health and right
intention, show that they are capable of dedicating themselves permanently to the
sacred ministries.
§2 Before they are accepted, they must submit
documentation of their baptism and confirmation, and whatever else is required
by the provisions of the Charter of Priestly Formation.
§3 If there is question of admitting those who have
been dismissed from another seminary or religious institute, there is also
required the testimony of the respective superior, especially concerning the
reason for their dismissal or departure.
[See Congregation for Catholic Education, Instruction on admitting candidates coming from other seminaries or religious communities, 8.III.1996, on the correct application of this provision]
Can. 242 §1 Each nation is to have a programme of priestly formation which is to be established by the conference of bishops, attentive to the norms issued by the supreme authority of the Church, and which is to be confirmed by the Holy See. This programme is to be adapted to new circumstances, also with the confirmation of the Holy See, and is to define the main principles of the instruction to be given in the seminary and general norms adapted to the pastoral needs of each region or province.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
§2 The norms of the Charter mentioned in §1 are to be
observed in all seminaries, whether diocesan or inter‑diocesan.
Can. 243 In addition, each seminary
is to have its own rule, approved by the diocesan Bishop or, in the case of an
inter‑diocesan seminary, by the Bishops concerned. In this, the norms of
the Charter of Priestly Formation are to be adapted to the particular
circumstances and developed in greater detail, especially on points of
discipline affecting the daily life of the students and the good order of the
entire seminary.
Can. 244 The spiritual formation and
the doctrinal instruction of the students in a seminary are to be harmoniously
blended. They are to be so planned that the students, each according to his
talents, simultaneously develop the requisite human maturity and acquire the
spirit of the Gospel and a close relationship with Christ.
Can. 245 §1 Through their spiritual
formation students are to be fitted for the fruitful exercise of the pastoral
ministry, and are to be inculcated with a sense of mission. They are to learn
that a ministry which is always exercised with lively faith and charity contributes
effectively to their personal sanctification. They are to learn to cultivate
those virtues which are highly valued in human relationships, in such a way
that they can arrive at an appropriate harmony between human and supernatural
values.
§2 Students are to be so trained that, filled with
love for Christ’s Church, they are linked to the Roman Pontiff, the successor
of Peter, in humble and filial charity, to their own Bishop as his faithful co‑workers
and to their brethren in friendly cooperation. Through the common life in the
seminary, and by developing relationships of friendship and of association with
others, they are to be prepared for the fraternal unity of the diocesan presbyterium, in whose service of the
Church they will share.
Can. 246 §1 The celebration of the Eucharist
is to be the centre of the whole life of the seminary, so that the students,
participating in the very charity of Christ, may daily draw strength of soul
for their apostolic labour and for their spiritual life particularly from this
richest of sources.
§2 They are to be formed in the celebration of the
liturgy of the hours, by which the ministers of God, in the name of the Church,
intercede with Him for all the people entrusted to them, and indeed for the
whole world.
§3 Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary, including the
rosary, mental prayer and other exercises of piety are to be fostered, so that
the students may acquire the spirit of prayer and be strengthened in their
vocation.
§4 The students are to become accustomed to approach
the sacrament of penance frequently. It is recommended that each should have a
director of his spiritual life, freely chosen, to whom he can trustfully reveal
his conscience.
§5 Each year the students are to make a spiritual
retreat.
Can. 247 §1 By appropriate instruction
they are to be prepared to observe celibacy and to learn to hold it in honour
as a special gift of God.
§2 The students are to be given all the requisite
knowledge concerning the duties and burdens which are proper to the sacred
ministers of the Church, concealing none of the difficulties of the priestly
life.
Can. 248 The doctrinal formation
given is to be so directed that the students may acquire a wide and solid
teaching in the sacred sciences, together with a general culture which is
appropriate to the needs of place and time. As a result, with their own faith
founded on and nourished by this teaching, they ought to be able properly to
proclaim the Gospel to the people of their own time, in a fashion suited to the
manner of the people’s thinking.
Can. 249 The Charter of Priestly
Formation is to provide that the students are not only taught their native
language accurately, but are also well versed in Latin, and have a suitable
knowledge of other languages which would appear to be necessary or useful for
their formation or for the exercise of their pastoral ministry.
Can. 250 The
philosophical and theological studies which are organised in the seminary
itself may be conducted either in succession or conjointly, in accordance with
the Charter of Priestly Formation. These studies are to take at least six full
years, in such a way that the time given to philosophical studies amounts to
two full years and that allotted to theological studies to four full years.
[The Congregation for the Clergy’s document The Gift of the Priestly Vocation (Ratio Fundamentalis Institutionis Sacerdotalis), 8.XII.2016, establishes the need for a propaedeutic year prior to the commencement of philosophical and theological studies.]
Can. 251 Philosophical formation
must be based on the philosophical heritage that is perennially valid, and it
is also to take account of philosophical investigations over the course of
time. It is to be so given that it furthers the human formation of the students,
sharpens their mental edge and makes them more fitted to engage in theological
studies.
Can. 252 §1 Theological formation,
given in the light of faith and under the guidance of the magisterium, is to be imparted in such a way that the students
learn the whole of Catholic teaching, based on divine Revelation, that they
make it a nourishment of their own spiritual lives, and that in the exercise of
the ministry they may be able properly to proclaim and defend it.
§2 Students are to be instructed with special care in
sacred Scripture, so that they may acquire an insight into the whole of sacred
Scripture.
§3 Lectures are to be given in dogmatic theology,
based always on the written word of God and on sacred Tradition; through them
the students are to learn to penetrate more deeply into the mysteries of
salvation, with St. Thomas in particular as their teacher. Lectures are also to
be given in moral and pastoral theology, canon law, liturgy, ecclesiastical
history, and other auxiliary and special disciplines, in accordance with the
provisions of the Charter on Priestly Formation.
Can. 253 §1 The Bishop or the Bishops
concerned are to appoint as teachers in philosophical, theological and
juridical subjects only those who are of outstanding virtue and have a
doctorate or a licentiate from a university or faculty recognised by the Holy
See.
§2 Care is to be taken that different professors are
appointed for sacred Scripture, dogmatic theology, moral theology, liturgy,
philosophy, canon law and church history, and for other disciplines which are
to be taught by their own distinctive methods.
§3 A professor who seriously fails in his or her duty
is to be removed by the authority mentioned in §1.
Can. 254 §1 In their lectures, the
professors are to be continuously attentive to the intimate unity and harmony
of the entire doctrine of faith, so that the students are aware that they are
learning one science. To ensure this, there is to be someone in the seminary
who is in charge of the overall organisation of studies.
§2 The students are to be taught in such a way that
they themselves are enabled to research various questions in the scientific way
appropriate to each question. There are, therefore, to be assignments in which,
under the guidance of the professors, the students learn to work out certain
subjects by their own efforts.
Can. 255 Although the whole
formation of students in the seminary has a pastoral purpose, a specifically
pastoral formation is also to be provided there; in this the students are to
learn the principles and the techniques which, according to the needs of place
and time, are relevant to the ministry of teaching, sanctifying and ruling the
people of God.
Can. 256 §1 Students are to be
carefully instructed in whatever especially pertains to the sacred ministry,
particularly in catechetics and homiletics, in divine worship and in a special
way in the celebration of the sacraments, in dealing with people, including non‑Catholics
and unbelievers, in parish administration and in the fulfilment of other tasks.
§2 The students are to be instructed about the
needs of the universal Church, so that they may have a solicitude for
encouraging vocations, for missionary and ecumenical questions, and for other
pressing matters, including social problems.
Can. 257 §1 The formation of students
is to ensure that they are concerned not only for the particular Church in
which they are incardinated, but also for the universal Church, and that they
are ready to devote themselves to particular Churches which are beset by grave
need.
§2 The diocesan Bishop is to ensure that clerics who
intend to move from their own particular Church to a particular Church in
another region, are suitably prepared to exercise the sacred ministry there,
that is, that they learn the language of the region, and have an understanding
of its institutions, social conditions, usages and customs.
Can. 258 In order that the students
may also by practice learn the art of exercising the apostolate, they are in
the course of their studies, and especially during holiday time, to be
initiated into pastoral practice by suitable assignments, always under the supervision
of an experienced priest. These assignments, appropriate to the age of the
student and the conditions of the place, are to be determined by the Ordinary.
Can. 259 §1 It belongs to the diocesan
Bishop or, in the case of an inter‑diocesan seminary, to the Bishops
concerned to determine those matters which concern the overall control and
administration of the seminary.
§2 The diocesan Bishop or, in the case of an inter‑diocesan
seminary, the Bishops concerned, are frequently to visit the seminary in
person. They are to oversee the formation of their students, and the
philosophical and theological instruction given in the seminary. They are to
inform themselves about the vocation, character, piety and progress of the
students, in view particularly to the conferring of sacred orders.
Can. 260 In the fulfilment of their
duties, all must obey the rector, who is responsible for the day to day
direction of the seminary, in accordance with the norms of the Charter of
Priestly Formation and the rule of the seminary.
Can. 261 §1 The rector of the seminary
is to ensure that the students faithfully observe the norms of the Charter of
Priestly Formation and the rule of the seminary; under his authority, and
according to their different positions, the moderators and professors have the
same responsibility.
Can. 262 The seminary is to be
exempt from parochial governance. For all those in the seminary, the function
of the parish priest is to be discharged by the rector of the seminary or his
delegate, with the exception of matters concerning marriage and without prejudice
to the provisions of can. 985.
Can. 263 The diocesan Bishop must
ensure that the building and maintenance of the seminary, the support of the
students, the remuneration of the teachers and the other needs of the seminary
are provided for. In an inter‑diocesan seminary this responsibility
devolves upon the Bishops concerned, each to the extent allotted by their
common agreement.
Can. 264 §1 To provide for the needs of
the seminary, the Bishop can, apart from the collection mentioned in can. 1266,
impose a levy in the diocese.
§2 Every ecclesiastical juridical person is subject to
the levy for the seminary, including even private juridical persons, which have
a centre in the diocese. Exception is made for those whose sole support comes
from alms, or in which there is actually present a college of students or of
teachers for furthering the common good of the Church. This levy should be
general, proportionate to the revenue of those who are subject to it and
calculated according to the needs of the seminary.
Can. 265 Every cleric must be incardinated either in a particular church or personal prelature, or in an institute of consecrated life or society endowed with this faculty, or also in a public clerical association which has obtained that faculty from the Apostolic See, in such a way that unattached or transient clerics are not allowed at all.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
Can. 266 §1 By the reception of the
diaconate a person becomes a cleric, and is incardinated in the particular
Church or personal Prelature for whose service he is ordained.
§2 A member who is perpetually professed in a
religious institute, or who is definitively incorporated into a clerical
society of apostolic life, is by the reception of the diaconate incardinated as
a cleric in that institute or society unless, in the case of a society, the
constitutions determine otherwise.
§3 A member of a secular institute is by the reception
of the diaconate incardinated into the particular Church for whose service he
was ordained, unless by virtue of a concession of the Apostolic See he is
incardinated into the institute itself.
Can. 267 §1 To be validly incardinated
in another particular Church, a cleric who is already incardinated must obtain
a letter of excardination signed by the diocesan Bishop, and in the same way a
letter of incardination signed by the diocesan Bishop of the particular Church
in which he wishes to be incardinated.
§2 Excardination granted in this way does not take
effect until incardination is obtained in the other particular Church.
Can. 268 §1 A cleric who has lawfully
moved from his own particular Church to another is, by virtue of the law
itself, incardinated in that latter Church after five years, if he has declared
this intention in writing to both the diocesan Bishop of the host diocese and
his own diocesan Bishop, and neither of the two Bishops has indicated
opposition in writing within four months of receiving the cleric’s written
request.
§2 By perpetual or definitive admission into an
institute of consecrated life or a society of apostolic life, a cleric who in
accordance with can. 266 is incardinated in that institute or society, is excardinated from his own particular Church.
Can. 269 A diocesan Bishop is not to
incardinate a cleric unless:
1° the need or the advantage of his particular Church
requires it and the provisions of law concerning the worthy support of the
cleric are observed;
2° he knows by a lawful document that excardination
has been granted, and has also obtained from the excardinating
Bishop, under secrecy if need be, appropriate testimonials concerning the
cleric’s life, behaviour and studies;
3° the cleric declares in writing to the same Bishop
that he wishes to enter the service of the new particular Church in accordance
with the norms of law.
Can. 270 Excardination can be
lawfully granted only for a just reason, such as the advantage of the Church or
the good of the cleric. It may not, however, be refused unless grave reasons
exist; it is lawful for a cleric who considers himself to be unfairly treated
and who has a Bishop to receive him, to have recourse against the decision.
Can. 271 §1 Except for a grave need of
his own particular Church, a Bishop is not to refuse clerics seeking permission
to move whom he knows to be prepared and considers suitable to exercise the
ministry in regions which suffer from a grave shortage of clergy. He is to
ensure, however, that the rights and duties of these clerics are determined by
written agreement with the diocesan Bishop of the place to which they wish to
move.
§2 A Bishop can give permission to his clerics to move
to another particular Church for a specified time. Such permission can be
renewed several times, but in such a way that the clerics remain incardinated
in their own particular Church, and on returning there enjoy all the rights
which they would have had if they had ministered there.
§3 A cleric who lawfully moves to another particular
Church while remaining incardinated in his own, may for a just reason be
recalled by his own Bishop, provided the agreements entered into with the other
Bishop are honoured and natural equity is observed. Under the same conditions,
the Bishop of the other particular Church can for a just reason refuse the
cleric permission to reside further in his territory.
Can. 272 The diocesan Administrator
cannot grant excardination nor incardination, nor permission to move to another
particular Church, unless the episcopal see has been vacant for a year, and he
has the consent of the college of consultors.
Can. 273 Clerics have a special
obligation to show reverence and obedience to the Supreme Pontiff and to their
own Ordinary.
Can. 274 §1 Only clerics can obtain
offices the exercise of which requires the power of order or the power of
ecclesiastical governance.
§2 Unless excused by a lawful impediment, clerics are
obliged to accept and faithfully fulfil the office committed to them by their
Ordinary.
Can. 275 §1 Since all clerics are
working for the same purpose, namely the building up of the body of Christ,
they are to be united with one another in the bond of brotherhood and prayer.
They are to seek to cooperate with one another, in accordance with the provisions
of particular law.
§2 Clerics are to acknowledge and promote the mission
which the laity, each for his or her part, exercises in the Church and in the
world.
Can. 276 §1 Clerics have a special
obligation to seek holiness in their lives, because they are consecrated to God
by a new title through the reception of orders, and are stewards of the
mysteries of God in the service of His people.
§2 In order that they can pursue this perfection:
1° they are in the first place faithfully and
untiringly to fulfil the obligations of their pastoral ministry;
2° they are to nourish their spiritual life at the
twofold table of the sacred Scripture and the Eucharist; priests are therefore
earnestly invited to offer the Eucharistic Sacrifice daily, and deacons to
participate daily in the offering;
3° priests, and deacons aspiring to the priesthood,
are obliged to carry out the liturgy of the hours daily, in accordance with
their own approved liturgical books; permanent deacons are to recite that part
of it determined by the Episcopal Conference;
4° they are also obliged to make spiritual retreats,
in accordance with the provision of particular law;
5° they are exhorted to engage regularly in mental
prayer, to approach the sacrament of penance frequently, to honour the Virgin
Mother of God with particular veneration, and to use other general and special
means to holiness.
Can. 277 §1 Clerics are obliged to
observe perfect and perpetual continence for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven,
and are therefore bound to celibacy. Celibacy is a special gift of God by which
sacred ministers can more easily remain close to Christ with an undivided
heart, and can dedicate themselves more freely to the service of God and their
neighbour.
§2 Clerics are to behave with due prudence in relation
to persons whose company can be a danger to their obligation of preserving
continence or can lead to scandal of the faithful.
§3 The diocesan Bishop has authority to establish more
detailed rules concerning this matter, and to pass judgement on the observance
of the obligation in particular cases.
Can. 278 §1 The secular clergy have the
right of association with others for the achievement of purposes befitting the
clerical state.
§2 The secular clergy are to hold in high esteem those
associations especially whose statutes are recognised by the competent
authority and which, by a suitable and well tried
rule of life and by fraternal support, promote holiness in the exercise of
their ministry and foster the unity of the clergy with one another and with
their Bishop.
§3 Clerics are to refrain from establishing or joining
associations whose purpose or activity cannot be reconciled with the
obligations proper to the clerical state, or which can hinder the diligent
fulfilment of the office entrusted to them by the competent ecclesiastical
authority.
Can. 279 §1 Clerics are to continue
their sacred studies even after ordination to the priesthood. They are to hold
to that solid doctrine based on sacred Scripture which has been handed down by
our forebears and which is generally received in the Church, as set out
especially in the documents of the Councils and of the Roman Pontiffs. They are
to avoid profane novelties and pseudo‑science.
§2 Priests are to attend pastoral courses to be
arranged for them after their ordination, in accordance with the provisions of
particular law. At times determined by the same law, they are to attend other
courses, theological meetings or conferences, which offer them an occasion to
acquire further knowledge of the sacred sciences and of pastoral methods.
§3 They are also to seek a knowledge of other
sciences, especially those linked to the sacred sciences, particularly insofar
as they benefit the exercise of the pastoral ministry.
Can. 280 Some manner of common life
is highly recommended to clerics; where it exists, it is as far as possible to
be maintained.
Can. 281 §1 Since clerics dedicate
themselves to the ecclesiastical ministry, they deserve the remuneration that
befits their condition, taking into account both the nature of their office and
the conditions of time and place. It is to be such that it provides for the
necessities of their life and for the just remuneration of those whose services
they need.
§2 Suitable provision is likewise to be made for such
social welfare as they may need in infirmity, sickness or old age.
§3 Married deacons who dedicate themselves full‑time
to the ecclesiastical ministry deserve remuneration sufficient to provide for
themselves and their families. Those, however, who receive a remuneration by
reason of a secular profession which they exercise or exercised, are to see to
their own and to their families’ needs from that income.
Can. 282 §1 Clerics are to follow a
simple way of life and avoid anything which smacks of worldliness.
§2 Goods which they receive on the occasion of the
exercise of an ecclesiastical office, and which are over and above what is
necessary for their worthy upkeep and the fulfilment of all the duties of their
state, they may well wish to use for the good of the Church and for charitable
works.
Can. 283 §1 Clerics, even if they do
not have a residential office, are not to be absent from their diocese for a
considerable time, to be determined by particular law, without the at least
presumed permission of their proper Ordinary.
§2 They may, however, take a rightful and sufficient
holiday every year, for the length of time determined by general or by
particular law.
Can. 284 Clerics are to wear
suitable ecclesiastical dress, in accordance with the norms established by the
Episcopal Conference and legitimate local custom.
Can. 285 §1 Clerics are to shun
completely everything that is unbecoming to their state, in accordance with the
provisions of particular law.
§2 Clerics are to avoid whatever is foreign to their
state, even when it is not unseemly.
§3 Clerics are forbidden to assume public office
whenever it means sharing in the exercise of civil power.
§4 Without the permission of their Ordinary, they may
not undertake the administration of goods belonging to lay people, or secular
offices which involve the obligation to render an account. They are forbidden
to act as surety, even concerning their own goods, without consulting their
proper Ordinary. They are not to sign promissory notes which involve the
payment of money but do not state the reasons for the payment.
[See the new can. 1393 §2 establishing the offence of grave violation of the stipulations in can. 285 §4]
Can. 286 Clerics are forbidden to
practise commerce or trade, either personally or through another, for their own
or another’s benefit, except with the permission of the lawful ecclesiastical
authority.
Can. 287 §1 Clerics are always to do
their utmost to foster among people peace and harmony based on justice.
§2 They are not to play an active role in political
parties or in directing trade unions unless, in the judgement of the competent
ecclesiastical authority, this is required for the defence of the rights of the
Church or to promote the common good.
Can. 288 Permanent deacons are not
bound by the provisions of cann. 284, 285 §§3 and 4,
286, 287 §2, unless particular law states otherwise.
Can. 289 §1 As military service ill
befits the clerical state, clerics and candidates for sacred orders are not to
volunteer for the armed services without the permission of their Ordinary.
§2 Clerics are to take advantage of exemptions from
exercising functions and public civil offices foreign to the clerical state,
which are granted in their favour by law, agreements or customs, unless their
proper Ordinary has in particular cases decreed otherwise.
Can. 290 Sacred ordination once
validly received never becomes invalid. A cleric, however, loses the clerical
state:
1° by a judgement of a court or an administrative
decree, declaring the ordination invalid;
2° by the penalty of dismissal lawfully imposed;
3° by a rescript of the Apostolic See; this rescript,
however, is granted to deacons only for grave reasons and to priests only for
the gravest of reasons.
[Competence in this matter belongs to the Office created at the Roman Rota: see m.p. Quaerit semper, 30.VIII.2011]
Can. 291 Apart from the cases
mentioned in can. 290, n. 1, the loss of the clerical state does not carry with
it a dispensation from the obligation of celibacy, which is granted solely by
the Roman Pontiff.
Can. 292 A cleric who loses the
clerical state in accordance with the law, loses thereby the rights that are
proper to the clerical state and is no longer bound by any obligations of the
clerical state, without prejudice to can. 291. He is prohibited from exercising
the power of order, without prejudice to can. 976. He is automatically deprived
of all offices and roles and of any delegated power.
Can. 293 A cleric who has lost the
clerical state cannot be enrolled as a cleric again save by rescript of the
Apostolic See.
Can. 294 Personal prelatures may be
established by the Apostolic See after consultation with the Episcopal
Conferences concerned. They are composed of deacons and priests of the secular
clergy. Their purpose is to promote an appropriate distribution of priests, or
to carry out special pastoral or missionary enterprises in different regions or
for different social groups.
Can. 295 §1 A personal prelature, which
is similar to public clerical associations of pontifical right with the faculty
of incardinating clerics, is governed by statutes laid down by the Apostolic
See. It is presided over by a Prelate as Moderator, endowed with the faculties
of an Ordinary, who has the right to establish a national or an international
seminary, and to incardinate students and promote them to orders with the title
of service of the prelature.
[Revised wording according to m.p. modifying the canons on personal prelatures, 8.VIII.2023]
§2 As Moderator endowed with the faculties of an
Ordinary, the Prelate must provide both for the spiritual formation of those
who are ordained with this title, and for their becoming support.
[Revised wording according to m.p. modifying the canons on personal prelatures, 8.VIII.2023]
Can. 296 Respecting the provisions
of can. 107, lay people can dedicate themselves to the apostolic work of a
personal prelature by way of agreements made with the prelature. The manner of
this organic cooperation and the principal obligations and rights associated
with it, are to be duly defined in the statutes.
[Revised wording according to m.p. modifying the canons on personal prelatures, 8.VIII.2023]
Can. 297 The statutes are likewise
to define the relationships of the prelature with the local Ordinaries in whose
particular Churches the prelature, with the prior consent of the diocesan
Bishop, exercises or wishes to exercise its pastoral or missionary activity.
Can. 298 §1 In the Church there are
associations which are distinct from institutes of consecrated life and
societies of apostolic life. In these associations, Christ’s faithful, whether
clerics or laity, or clerics and laity together, strive with a common effort to
foster a more perfect life, or to promote public worship or Christian teaching.
They may also devote themselves to other works of the apostolate, such as
initiatives for evangelisation, works of piety or charity, and those which
animate the temporal order with the Christian spirit.
§2 Christ’s faithful are to join especially those
associations which have been established, praised or recommended by the
competent ecclesiastical authority.
Can. 299 §1 By private agreement among
themselves, Christ’s faithful have the right to constitute associations for the
purposes mentioned in can. 298 §1, without prejudice to the provisions of can.
301 §1.
§2 Associations of this kind, even though they may be
praised or commended by ecclesiastical authority, are called private
associations.
§3 No private association of Christ’s faithful is
recognised in the Church unless its statutes have been reviewed by the
competent authority.
Can. 300 No association may call
itself ‘Catholic’ except with the consent of the competent ecclesiastical
authority, in accordance with can. 312.
Can. 301 §1 It is for the competent
ecclesiastical authority alone to establish associations of Christ’s faithful
which intend to impart Christian teaching in the name of the Church, or to
promote public worship, or which are directed to other ends whose pursuit is of
its nature reserved to the same ecclesiastical authority.
§2 The competent ecclesiastical authority, if it
judges it expedient, can also establish associations of Christ’s faithful to
pursue, directly or indirectly, other spiritual ends whose attainment is not
adequately provided for by private initiatives.
§3 Associations of Christ’s faithful which are
established by the competent ecclesiastical authority are called public
associations.
Can. 302 Associations of Christ’s faithful are called clerical when they are under the direction of clerics, presuppose the exercise of sacred orders, and are acknowledged as such by the competent authority.
[In 2008 Benedict XVI granted the Congregation (now Dicastery) for the Clergy the privilege of allowing public clerical assocations to incardinate clerics. The privilege was confirmed by Pope Francis on 29.V.2017. See also the revised wording of can. 265 following Competentias quasdam decernere]
Can. 303 Associations whose members
live in the world but share in the spirit of some religious institute, under
the overall direction of the same institute, and who lead an apostolic life and
strive for Christian perfection, are known as third orders, or are called by
some other suitable title.
Can. 304 §1 All associations
of Christ’s faithful, whether public or private, by whatever title or name they
are called, are to have their own statutes. These are to define the purpose or
social objective of the association, its centre, its governance and the conditions
of membership. They are also to specify the manner of action of the
association, paying due regard to what is necessary or useful in the
circumstances of the time and place.
[See General
Decree of Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life, 11.VI.2021, setting time
limits on terms of office, and ordering elections where these have been
exceeded]
§2 Associations are to select for themselves a title
or name which is in keeping with the practices of the time and place,
especially one derived from the purpose they intend.
Can. 305 §1 All associations of
Christ’s faithful are subject to the supervision of the competent
ecclesiastical authority. This authority is to ensure that integrity of faith
and morals is maintained in them and that abuses in ecclesiastical discipline
do not creep in. The competent authority has therefore the duty and the right
to visit these associations, in accordance with the law and the statutes.
Associations are also subject to the governance of the same authority in
accordance with the provisions of the canons which follow.
§2 Associations of every kind are subject to the supervision of the Holy See. Diocesan associations are subject to the supervision of the local Ordinary, as are other associations to the extent that they work in the diocese.
Can. 306 To enjoy the rights and
privileges, indulgences and other spiritual favours granted to an association,
it is necessary and sufficient that a person be validly received into the
association in accordance with the provisions of the law and with the association’s
own statutes, and be not lawfully dismissed from it.
Can. 307 §1 The admission of members is
to take place in accordance with the law and with the statutes of each
association.
§2 The same person can be enrolled in several
associations.
§3 In accordance with their own law, members of
religious institutes may, with the consent of their Superior, join
associations.
Can. 308 No one who was lawfully
admitted is to be dismissed from an association except for a just reason, in
accordance with the law and the statutes.
Can. 309 Associations that are
lawfully established have the right, in accordance with the law and the
statutes, to make particular norms concerning the association, for the holding
of meetings, and for the appointment of moderators, officials, ministers and
administrators of goods.
Can. 310 A private association which
has not been constituted a juridical person cannot, as such, be the subject of
duties and rights. However the faithful who are joined together in it can
jointly contract obligations. As joint owners and joint possessors they can
acquire and possess rights and goods. They can exercise these rights and
obligations through a delegate or a proxy.
Can. 311 Members of institutes of
consecrated life who preside over or assist associations which are joined in
some way to their institute, are to ensure that these associations help the
apostolic works existing in the diocese. They are especially to cooperate, under
the direction of the local Ordinary, with associations which are directed to
the exercise of the apostolate in the diocese.
Can. 312 §1 The authority which is
competent to establish public associations is:
1° the Holy See, for universal and international
associations
2° the Episcopal Conference in its own territory, for
national associations which by their very establishment are intended for work
throughout the whole nation;
3° the diocesan Bishop, each in his own territory, but not the diocesan Administrator, for diocesan associations, with the exception, however, of associations the right to whose establishment is reserved to others by apostolic privilege.
[See Rescript
“ex audientia Ss.mi” of 15.VI.2022
requiring the diocesan bishop, before erecting by decree a public association
of the faithful with a view to its becoming an institute of consecrated life or
a society of apostolic life, to obtain the written permission of the Dicastery for
Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life: cf. can. 579]
§2 The written consent of the diocesan Bishop is
required for the valid establishment of an association or branch of an
association in the diocese even though it is done in virtue of an apostolic
privilege. Permission, however, which is given by the diocesan Bishop for the
foundation of a house of a religious institute, is valid also for the
establishment in the same house, or in a church attached to it, of an
association which is proper to
that institute.
Can. 313 A public association or a confederation of
public associations is constituted a juridical person by the very decree by
which it is established by the authority competent in accordance with can. 312.
Moreover, insofar as is required, it thereby receives its mission to pursue, in
the name of the Church, those ends which it proposes for itself.
Can. 314 The statutes of any public
association require the approval of the authority which, in accordance with
can. 312 §1, is competent to establish the association; this approval is also
required for a revision of, or a change in, the statutes.
Can. 315 Public associations can, on
their own initiative, undertake projects which are appropriate to their
character, and they are governed by the statutes, but under the overall
direction of the ecclesiastical authority mentioned in can. 312 §1.
Can. 316 §1 A person who has publicly
rejected the Catholic faith, or has defected from ecclesiastical communion, or
upon whom an excommunication has been imposed or declared, cannot validly be
received into public associations.
§2 Those who have been lawfully enrolled but who fall
into one of the categories mentioned in §1, having been previously warned, are
to be dismissed, in accordance with the statutes of the association, without
prejudice to their right of recourse to the ecclesiastical authority mentioned
in can. 312 §1.
Can. 317 §1 Unless the statutes provide
otherwise, it belongs to the ecclesiastical authority mentioned in can. 312 §1
to confirm the moderator of a public association on election, or to appoint the
moderator on presentation, or by his own right to appoint the moderator. The
same authority appoints the chaplain or ecclesiastical assistant, after
consulting the senior officials of the association, wherever this is expedient.
§2 The norm of §1 is also valid for associations which
members of religious institutes, by apostolic privilege, establish outside
their own churches or houses. In associations which members of religious
institutes establish in their own church or house, the appointment or
confirmation of the moderator and chaplain belongs to the Superior of the
institute, in accordance with the statutes.
§3 The laity can be moderators of associations which
are not clerical. The chaplain or ecclesiastical assistant is not to be the
moderator, unless the statutes provide otherwise.
§4 Those who hold an office of direction in political
parties are not to be moderators in public associations of the faithful which
are directly ordered to the exercise of the apostolate.
Can. 318 §1 In special circumstances,
when serious reasons so require the ecclesiastical authority mentioned in can.
312 §1 can appoint a commissioner to direct the association in his name for the
time being.
§2 The moderator of a public association may be
removed for a just reason, by the person who made the appointment or the
confirmation, but the Moderator himself and the senior officials of the
association must be consulted, in accordance with the statutes. The chaplain
can, however, be removed by the person who appointed him, in accordance with cann. 192‑195.
Can. 319 §1 Unless otherwise provided,
a lawfully established public association administers the goods it possesses,
in accordance with the statutes, and under the overall direction of the
ecclesiastical authority mentioned in can. 312 §1. It must give a yearly account
to this authority.
§2 The association must also faithfully account to the
same authority for the disbursement of contributions and alms which it has
collected.
Can. 320 §1 Associations established by
the Holy See can be suppressed only by the Holy See.
§2 For grave reasons, associations established by the
Episcopal Conference can be suppressed by it. The diocesan Bishop can suppress
those he has established, and also those which members of religious institutes
have established by apostolic indult with the consent of the diocesan Bishop.
§3 A public association is not to be suppressed by the
competent authority unless the moderator and other senior officials have been
consulted.
Can. 321 Christ’s faithful direct
and moderate private associations according to the provisions of the statutes.
Can. 322 §1 A private association of
Christ’s faithful can acquire juridical personality by a formal decree of the
competent ecclesiastical authority mentioned in can. 312.
§2 No private association of Christ’s faithful can
acquire juridical personality unless its statutes are approved by the
ecclesiastical authority mentioned in can. 312 §1. The approval of the statutes
does not, however, change the private nature of the association.
Can. 323 §1 Although private
associations of Christ’s faithful enjoy their own autonomy in accordance with
can. 321, they are subject to the supervision of ecclesiastical authority, in
accordance with can. 305, and also to the governance of the same authority.
§2 It is also the responsibility of ecclesiastical
authority, with due respect for the autonomy of private associations, to
oversee and ensure that there is no dissipation of their forces, and that the
exercise of their apostolate is directed to the common good.
Can. 324 §1 A private association of
Christ’s faithful can freely designate for itself a moderator and officers, in
accordance with the statutes.
§2 If a private association of Christ’s faithful
wishes to have a spiritual counsellor, it can freely choose one for itself from
among the priests who lawfully exercise a ministry in the diocese, but the
priest requires the confirmation of the local Ordinary.
Can. 325 §1 A private association of
Christ’s faithful is free to administer any goods it possesses, according to
the provisions of the statutes, but the competent ecclesiastical authority has
the right to ensure that the goods are applied to the purposes of the association.
§2 In accordance with can. 1301, the association is
subject to the authority of the local Ordinary in whatever concerns the
administration and distribution of goods which are donated or left to it for
pious purposes.
Can. 326 §1 A private association of
Christ’s faithful is extinguished in accordance with the norms of the statutes.
It can also be suppressed by the competent authority if its activity gives rise
to grave harm to ecclesiastical teaching or discipline, or is a scandal to the
faithful.
§2 The fate of the
goods of a private association which ceases to exist is to be determined in
accordance with the statutes, without prejudice to acquired rights and to the
wishes of donors.
[The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s Letter Iuvenescit Ecclesia, 15.V.2016, footnote 116, says that, as regards the recognition of ecclesial entities of a charismatic nature, a private association of the Christian faithful in accordance with canons 321-326 appears to be the most simple juridical form at the present time. Nonetheless, it is worthwhile considering other juridical forms such as public associations of the Christian faithful (canons 573-730), clerical associations of the Christian faithful (canon 302), institutes of consecrated life (canons 573-730), societies of apostolic life (canons 731-746), and personal prelatures (canons 294-297)]
Can. 327 Lay members of Christ’s
faithful are to hold in high esteem associations established for the spiritual
purposes mentioned in can. 298. They should especially esteem those
associations whose aim is to animate the temporal order with the Christian
spirit, and thus greatly foster an intimate union between faith and life.
Can. 328 Those who head lay
associations, even those established by apostolic privilege, are to ensure that
their associations cooperate with other associations of Christ’s faithful,
where this is expedient. They are to give their help freely to various Christian
works, especially those in the same territory.
Can. 329 Moderators of lay
associations are to ensure that the members receive due formation, so that they
may carry out the apostolate which is proper to the laity.
Can. 330 Just as, by the decree of
the Lord, Saint Peter and the rest of the Apostles form one College, so for a
like reason the Roman Pontiff, the successor of Peter, and the Bishops, the
successors of the Apostles, are united together in one.
Can. 331 The office uniquely
committed by the Lord to Peter, the first of the Apostles, and to be
transmitted to his successors, abides in the Bishop of the Church of Rome. He
is the head of the College of Bishops, the Vicar of Christ, and the Pastor of
the universal Church here on earth. Consequently, by virtue of his office, he
has supreme, full, immediate and universal ordinary power in the Church, and he
can always freely exercise this power.
Can. 332 §1 The Roman
Pontiff acquires full and supreme power in the Church when, together with
episcopal consecration, he has been lawfully elected and has accepted the
election. Accordingly, if he already has the episcopal character, he receives
this power from the moment he accepts election to the supreme pontificate. If
he does not have the episcopal character, he is immediately to be ordained
Bishop.
[The Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, 22.II.1996, governs the manner of electing the Roman Pontiff; it was amended by a m.p. of Pope Benedict of 11.VI.2007 reinstating the requirement that a papal election require a two-thirds majority regardless of the number of ballots taken; and by a further m.p. Normas nonnullas of 25.II.2013 introducing various other modifications]
§2 Should it happen that the Roman Pontiff resigns
from his office, it is required for validity that the resignation be freely
made and properly manifested, but it is not necessary that it be accepted by
anyone.
Can. 333 §1 By virtue of his office,
the Roman Pontiff not only has power over the universal Church, but also has
pre‑eminent ordinary power over all particular Churches and their
groupings. This reinforces and defends the proper, ordinary and immediate power
which the Bishops have in the particular Churches entrusted to their care.
§2 The Roman Pontiff, in fulfilling his office as
supreme Pastor of the Church, is always joined in full communion with the other
Bishops, and indeed with the whole Church. He has the right, however, to
determine, according to the needs of the Church, whether this office is to be
exercised in a personal or in a collegial manner.
§3 There is neither appeal nor recourse against a
judgement or a decree of the Roman Pontiff.
Can. 334 The Bishops are available
to the Roman Pontiff in the exercise of his office, to cooperate with him in
various ways, among which is the synod of Bishops. Cardinals also assist him,
as do other persons and, according to the needs of the time, various institutes;
all these persons and institutes fulfil their offices in his name and by his
authority, for the good of all the Churches, in accordance with the norms
determined by law.
Can. 335 When the Roman See is
vacant, or completely impeded, no innovation is to be made in the governance of
the universal Church. The special laws enacted for these circumstances are to
be observed.
Article 2: The College of Bishops
Can. 336 The head of the College of
Bishops is the Supreme Pontiff, and its members are the Bishops by virtue of
their sacramental consecration and hierarchical communion with the head of the
College and its members. This College of Bishops, in which the apostolic body
abides in an unbroken manner, is, in union with its head and never without this
head, also the subject of supreme and full power over the universal Church.
Can. 337 §1 The College of Bishops
exercises its power over the universal Church in solemn form in an Ecumenical
Council.
§2 It exercises this same power by the united action
of the Bishops dispersed throughout the world, when this action is as such
proclaimed or freely accepted by the Roman Pontiff, so that it becomes a truly
collegial act.
§3 It belongs to the Roman Pontiff to select and
promote, according to the needs of the Church, ways in which the College of
Bishops can exercise its office in respect of the universal Church in a
collegial manner.
Can. 338 §1 It is the prerogative of
the Roman Pontiff alone to summon an Ecumenical Council, to preside over it
personally or through others, to transfer, suspend or dissolve the Council, and
to approve its decrees.
§2 It is also the prerogative of the Roman Pontiff to
determine the matters to be dealt with in the Council, and to establish the
order to be observed. The Fathers of the Council may add other matters to those
proposed by the Roman Pontiff, but these must be approved by the Roman Pontiff
.
Can. 339 §1 All Bishops, but only
Bishops who are members of the College of Bishops, have the right and the
obligation to be present at an Ecumenical Council with a deliberative vote.
§2 Some others besides, who do not have the episcopal
dignity, can be summoned to an Ecumenical Council by the supreme authority in
the Church, to whom it belongs to determine what part they take in the Council.
Can. 340 If the Apostolic See should
become vacant during the celebration of the Council, it is by virtue of the law
itself suspended until the new Supreme Pontiff either orders it to continue or
dissolves it.
Can. 341 §1 The decrees of an
Ecumenical Council do not oblige unless they are approved by the Roman Pontiff
as well as by the Fathers of the Council, confirmed by the Roman Pontiff and
promulgated by his direction.
§2 If they are to have binding force, the same
confirmation and promulgation is required for decrees which the College of
Bishops issues by truly collegial actions in another manner introduced or
freely accepted by the Roman Pontiff.
Can. 342 The synod of
Bishops is a group of Bishops selected from different parts of the world, who
meet together at specified times to promote the close relationship between the
Roman Pontiff and the Bishops. These Bishops, by their counsel, assist the
Roman Pontiff in the defence and development of faith and morals and in the
preservation and strengthening of ecclesiastical discipline. They also consider
questions concerning the mission of the Church in the world.
[See Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio, 15.IX.2018, on the Synod
of Bishops]
Can. 343 The function of the synod
of Bishops is to discuss the matters proposed to it and set forth
recommendations. It is not its function to settle matters or to draw up
decrees, unless the Roman Pontiff has given it deliberative power in certain
cases; in this event, it rests with the Roman Pontiff to ratify the decisions
of the synod.
Can. 344 The synod of Bishops is
directly under the authority of the Roman Pontiff, whose prerogative it is:
1° to convene the synod, as often as this seems
opportune to him, and to designate the place where the meetings are to be held
2° to ratify the election of those who, in accordance
with the special law of the synod, are to be elected, and to designate and
appoint other members;
3° at a suitable time before the celebration of the
synod, to prescribe the outlines of the questions to be discussed, in
accordance with the special law;
4° to determine the agenda;
5° to preside over the synod personally or through
others;
6° to conclude, transfer, suspend or dissolve the
synod.
Can. 345 The synod of Bishops can
meet in general assembly, in which matters are dealt with which directly
concern the good of the universal Church; such an assembly is either ordinary
or extraordinary. It can also meet in special assembly, to deal with matters directly
affecting a determined region or regions.
Can. 346 §1 The synod of Bishops meeting in ordinary general assembly is comprised, for the most part, of Bishops elected for each assembly by the Episcopal Conferences, in accordance with the norms of the special law of the synod. Other members are designated according to the same law; others are directly appointed by the Roman Pontiff. Added to these are some members of clerical religious institutes, elected in accordance with the same special law.
[See Authentic
Interpretation of canon 346 §1, 10.X.1991, allowing emeritus bishops to be
elected as members]
[On 17.VI.2023, Pope Francis approved
the extension of participation in the Synodal Assembly to “non-bishops” (priests,
deacons, consecrated men and women, lay men and women)]
§2 The synod of Bishops meeting in extraordinary
general assembly for the purpose of dealing with matters which require speedy
resolution, is comprised for the most part, of Bishops who, by reason of the
office they hold, are designated by the special law of the synod; others are
appointed directly by the Roman Pontiff. Added to these are some members of
clerical religious institutes, elected in accordance with the same law.
§3 The synod of Bishops which meets in special
assembly is comprised of members chosen principally from those regions for
which the synod was convened, in accordance with the special law by which the
synod is governed.
Can. 347 §1 When the meeting of the
synod of Bishops is concluded by the Roman Pontiff, the function entrusted in
it to the Bishops and other members ceases.
§2 If the Apostolic See becomes vacant after the synod
has been convened or during its celebration, the meeting of the synod, and the
function entrusted in it to the members, is by virtue of the law itself
suspended, until the new Pontiff decrees either that the assembly is to be
dissolved or that it is to continue.
Can. 348 §1 There is to be a permanent
general secretariat of the synod, presided over by a Secretary general
appointed by the Roman Pontiff. The Secretary is to have the assistance of a
council of the secretariat, composed of Bishops, some elected by the synod of Bishops
itself in accordance with the special law, others appointed by the Roman
Pontiff. The function of all these persons ceases with the beginning of a new
general assembly.
§2 For each assembly of the synod of Bishops there are
one or more special secretaries, who are appointed by the Roman Pontiff. They
remain in office only until the end of the synod assembly.
Can. 349 The Cardinals of the Holy
Roman Church constitute a special College, whose prerogative it is to elect the
Roman Pontiff in accordance with the norms of a special law. The Cardinals are
also available to the Roman Pontiff, either acting collegially, when they are
summoned together to deal with questions of major importance, or acting
individually, that is, in the offices which they hold in assisting the Roman
Pontiff especially in the daily care of the universal Church.
Can. 350 §1 The College of Cardinals is
divided into three orders: the episcopal order, to which belong those Cardinals
to whom the Roman Pontiff assigns the title of a suburbicarian Church, and
eastern‑rite Patriarchs who are made members of the College of Cardinals;
the presbyteral order, and the diaconal order.
§2 Cardinal priests and Cardinal deacons are each assigned a title or a deaconry in Rome by the Roman Pontiff.
[A Rescript
“ex audientia Ss.mi” of 26.VI.2018
coopted four Cardinals into the Order of Bishops and made them equivalent to
Cardinals who hold the title of a suburbicarian Church, in derogation of cann. 350 §§1-2 and 352 §§2-3]
§3 Eastern Patriarchs within the College of Cardinals
have their patriarchal see as a title.
§4 The Cardinal Dean has the title of the diocese of
Ostia, together with that of any other Church to which he already has a title.
§5 By a choice made in Consistory and approved by the
Supreme Pontiff, Cardinal priests may transfer to another title; Cardinal
deacons may transfer to another deaconry and, if they have been a full ten
years in the diaconal order, to the presbyteral order: priority of order and of
promotion is to be observed.
§6 A Cardinal who by choice transfers from the
diaconal to the presbyteral order, takes precedence over all Cardinal priests
who were promoted to the Cardinalate after him.
Can. 351 §1 Those to be promoted
Cardinals are men freely selected by the Roman Pontiff, who are at least in the
order of priesthood and are truly outstanding in doctrine, virtue, piety and
prudence in practical matters; those who are not already Bishops must receive
episcopal consecration.
§2 Cardinals are created by decree of the Roman
Pontiff, which in fact is published in the presence of the College of
Cardinals. From the moment of publication, they are bound by the obligations
and they enjoy the rights defined in the law.
§3 A person promoted to the dignity of Cardinal, whose
creation the Roman Pontiff announces, but whose name he reserves in petto, is
not at that time bound by the obligations nor does he enjoy the rights of a
Cardinal. When his name is published by the Roman Pontiff, however, he is bound
by these obligations and enjoys these rights, but his right of precedence dates
from the day of the reservation in petto.
Can. 352 §1 The Dean presides over the
College of Cardinals. When he is unable to do so, the sub‑Dean takes his
place. The Dean, or the subDean, has no power of
governance over the other Cardinals, but is considered as first among equals.
§2 When the office of Dean is vacant, those Cardinals
who have a suburbicarian title, and only those, under the presidency of the sub‑Dean
if he is present, or of the oldest member, elect one of their number to act as
Dean of the College. They are to submit his name to the Roman Pontiff, to whom
it belongs to approve the person elected.
§3 In the same way as set out in §2, the sub‑Dean is elected, with the Dean presiding. It belongs to the Roman Pontiff to approve also the election of the sub‑Dean.
[See can. 350 §§1-2 above]
§4 If the Dean and sub‑Dean do not already have
a domicile in Rome, they acquire it there.
Can. 353 §1 Cardinals assist the
Supreme Pastor of the Church in collegial fashion particularly in Consistories,
in which they are gathered by order of the Roman Pontiff and under his
presidency. Consistories are either ordinary or extraordinary.
§2 In an ordinary Consistory all Cardinals, or at
least those who are in Rome, are summoned for consultation on certain grave
matters of more frequent occurrence, or for the performance of especially
solemn acts.
§3 All Cardinals are summoned to an extraordinary
Consistory, which takes place when the special needs of the Church and more
serious matters suggest it.
§4 Only an ordinary Consistory in which certain
solemnities are celebrated, can be public, that is when, in addition to the
Cardinals, Prelates, representatives of civil states and other invited persons
are admitted.
Can. 354 Cardinals who head the
departments and other permanent sections of the Roman Curia and of Vatican
City, who have completed their seventy‑fifth year, are requested to offer
their resignation from office to the Roman Pontiff, who will consider all the
circumstances and make provision accordingly.
Can. 355 §1 It belongs to the Cardinal
Dean to ordain the elected Roman Pontiff a Bishop, if he is not already
ordained. If the Dean is prevented from doing so, the same right belongs to the
sub‑Dean or, if he is prevented, to the senior Cardinal of the episcopal
order.
§2 The senior Cardinal Deacon announces the name of
the newly elected Supreme Pontiff to the people. Acting in place of the Roman
Pontiff, he also confers the pallium on metropolitan Bishops or gives the
pallium to their proxies.
Can. 356 Cardinals have the
obligation of cooperating closely with the Roman Pontiff. For this reason,
Cardinals who have any office in the Curia and are not diocesan Bishops, are
obliged to reside in Rome. Cardinals who are in charge of a diocese as diocesan
Bishops, are to go to Rome whenever summoned by the Roman Pontiff.
Can. 357 §1 When a Cardinal has taken
possession of a suburbicarian Church or of a titular Church in Rome, he is to
further the good of the diocese or church by counsel and patronage. However, he
has no power of governance over it, and he should not for any reason interfere
in matters concerning the administration of its goods, or its discipline, or
the service of the church.
§2 Cardinals living outside Rome and outside their own
diocese, are exempt in what concerns their person from the power of governance
of the Bishop of the diocese in which they are residing.
Can. 358 A Cardinal may be deputed
by the Roman Pontiff to represent him in some solemn celebration or assembly of
persons as a ‘Legatus a latere’,
that is, as his alter ego; or he may, as a special emissary, be entrusted with
a particular pastoral task. A Cardinal thus nominated is entitled to deal only
with those affairs which have been entrusted to him by the Roman Pontiff
himself.
Can. 359 When the Apostolic See is
vacant, the College of Cardinals has only that power in the Church which is
granted to it by special law.
Can. 360 The Supreme Pontiff usually conducts the business of the universal Church through the Roman Curia, which acts in his name and with his authority for the good and for the service of the Churches. The Curia is composed of the Secretariat of State or Papal Secretariat, the Council for the public affairs of the Church, the Congregations*, the Tribunals and other Institutes. The constitution and competence of all these is defined by special law.
[See m.p. Praedicate Evangelium, reorganising the Roman Curia, 19.III.2022]
[*“Congregations” are now called “Dicasteries”]
Can. 361 In this Code the terms
Apostolic See or Holy See mean not only the Roman Pontiff, but also, unless the
contrary is clear from the nature of things or from the context, the
Secretariat of State, the Council for the public affairs of the Church, and the
other Institutes of the Roman Curia.
Can. 362 The Roman Pontiff has an
inherent and independent right to appoint Legates and to send them either to
particular Churches in various countries or regions, or at the same time to
States and to public Authorities. He also has the right to transfer or recall
them, in accordance with the norms of international law concerning the mission
and recall of representatives accredited to States.
Can. 363 §1 To Legates of the Roman
Pontiff is entrusted the office of representing in a stable manner the person
of the Roman Pontiff in the particular Churches, or also in the States and
public Authorities, to whom they are sent.
§2 Those also represent the Apostolic See who are
appointed to pontifical Missions as Delegates or Observers at international
Councils or at Conferences and Meetings.
Can. 364 The principal task of a
Papal Legate is continually to make more firm and effective the bonds of unity
which exist between the Holy See and the particular Churches. Within the
territory assigned to him, it is therefore the responsibility of a Legate:
1° to inform the Apostolic See about the conditions in
which the particular Churches find themselves, as well as about all matters
which affect the life of the Church and the good of souls;
2° to assist the Bishops by action and advice, while
leaving intact the exercise of their lawful power;
3° to foster close relations with the Episcopal
Conference, offering it every assistance;
4° in connection with the appointment of Bishops, to
send or propose names of candidates to the Apostolic See, as well as to prepare
the informative process about those who may be promoted, in accordance with the
norms issued by the Apostolic See;
5° to take pains to promote whatever may contribute to
peace, progress and the united efforts of peoples;
6° to work with the Bishops to foster appropriate
exchanges between the Catholic Church and other Churches or ecclesial
communities, and indeed with non‑Christian religions;
7° to work with the Bishops to safeguard, so far as
the rulers of the State are concerned, those things which relate to the mission
of the Church and of the Apostolic See;
8° to exercise the faculties and carry out the other
instructions which are given to him by the Apostolic See.
Can. 365 §1 A papal Legate who at the
same time acts as envoy to the State according to international law, has in
addition the special role:
1° of promoting and fostering relationships between
the Apostolic See and the Authorities of the State;
2° of dealing with questions concerning relations
between Church and State, especially, of drawing up concordats and other
similar agreements, and giving effect to them.
§2 As circumstances suggest, in the matters mentioned
in §1, the papal Legate is not to omit to seek the opinion and counsel of the
Bishops of the ecclesiastical jurisdiction and to keep them informed of the
course of events.
Can. 366 Given the special nature of
a Legate’s role:
1° the papal Legation is exempt from the power of
governance of the local Ordinary, except for the celebration of marriages;
2° the papal Legate has the right to perform
liturgical celebrations, even in pontificalia, in all
churches of the territory of his legation; as far as it is possible, he is to
give prior notice to the local Ordinary.
Can. 367 The office of papal Legate
does not cease when the Apostolic See is vacant, unless otherwise specified in
the pontifical Letters; it does cease, however, on the expiry of the mandate,
on receipt by him of notification of recall, and on acceptance of his
resignation by the Roman Pontiff.
[See m.p. Learn to take your leave,
12.II.2018, art. 3: “Pontifical Representatives do not ipso facto cede their
office upon reaching seventy-five years of age, but in this circumstance must
present their resignation to the Supreme Pontiff”]
Can. 368 Particular Churches, in
which and from which the one and only Catholic Church exists, are principally
dioceses. Unless the contrary is clear, the following are equivalent to a
diocese: a territorial prelature, a territorial abbacy, a vicariate apostolic,
a prefecture apostolic and a permanently established apostolic administration.
Can. 369 A diocese is a portion of
the people of God, which is entrusted to a Bishop to be nurtured by him, with
the cooperation of the presbyterium,
in such a way that, remaining close to its pastor and gathered by him through
the Gospel and the Eucharist in the Holy Spirit, it constitutes a particular
Church. In this Church, the one, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church of Christ
truly exists and functions.
Can. 370 A territorial prelature or
abbacy is a certain portion of the people of God, territorially defined, the
care of which is for special reasons entrusted to a Prelate or an Abbot, who
governs it, in the manner of a diocesan Bishop, as its proper pastor.
Can. 371 §1 A vicariate apostolic or a
prefecture apostolic is a certain portion of the people of God, which for
special reasons is not yet constituted a diocese, and which is entrusted to the
pastoral care of a Vicar apostolic or a Prefect apostolic, who governs it in
the name of the Supreme Pontiff.
§2 An apostolic administration is a certain portion of
the people of God which, for special and particularly serious reasons, is not
yet established by the Supreme Pontiff as a diocese, and whose pastoral care is
entrusted to an apostolic Administrator, who governs it in the name of the
Supreme Pontiff.
Can. 372 §1 As a rule, that portion of
the people of God which constitutes a diocese or other particular Church is to
have a defined territory, so that it comprises all the faithful who live in
that territory.
§2 If however, in the judgement of the supreme
authority in the Church, after consultation with the Episcopal Conferences
concerned, it is thought to be helpful, there may be established in a given
territory particular Churches distinguished by the rite of the faithful or by
some other similar quality.
Can. 373 It is within the competence
of the supreme authority alone to establish particular Churches; once they are
lawfully established, the law itself gives them juridical personality.
Can. 374 §1 Each diocese or other
particular Church is to be divided into distinct parts or parishes.
§2 To foster pastoral care by means of common action,
several neighbouring parishes can be joined together in special groups, such as
vicariates forane.
Can. 375 §1 By divine institution,
Bishops succeed the Apostles through the Holy Spirit who is given to them. They
are constituted Pastors in the Church, to be the teachers of doctrine, the
priests of sacred worship and the ministers of governance.
§2 By their episcopal consecration, Bishops receive,
together with the office of sanctifying, the offices also of teaching and of
ruling, which however, by their nature, can be exercised only in hierarchical
communion with the head of the College and its members.
Can. 376 Bishops to whom the care of
a given diocese is entrusted are called diocesan Bishops; the others are called
titular Bishops.
Can. 377 §1 The Supreme Pontiff freely
appoints Bishops or confirms those lawfully elected.
§2 At least every three years, the Bishops of an
ecclesiastical province or, if circumstances suggest it, of an Episcopal
Conference, are to draw up, by common accord and in secret, a list of priests,
even of members of institutes of consecrated life, who are suitable for the
episcopate; they are to send this list to the Apostolic See. This is without
prejudice to the right of every Bishop individually to make known to the
Apostolic See the names of priests whom he thinks are worthy and suitable for
the episcopal office.
§3 Unless it has been lawfully prescribed otherwise,
for the appointment of a diocesan Bishop or a coadjutor Bishop, a ternus, as it is called, is to be proposed to the Apostolic
See. In the preparation of this list, it is the responsibility of the papal
Legate to seek individually the suggestions of the Metropolitan and of the
Suffragans of the province to which the diocese in question belongs or with
which it is joined in some grouping, as well as the suggestions of the
president of the Episcopal Conference. The papal Legate is, moreover, to hear
the views of some members of the college of consultors and of the cathedral
chapter. If he judges it expedient, he is also to seek individually, and in
secret, the opinions of other clerics, both secular and religious, and of lay
persons of outstanding wisdom. He is then to send these suggestions, together
with his own opinion, to the Apostolic See.
§4 Unless it has been lawfully provided otherwise, the
diocesan Bishop who judges that his diocese requires an auxiliary Bishop, is to
propose to the Apostolic See a list of the names of at least three priests
suitable for this office .
§5 For the future, no rights or privileges of
election, appointment, presentation or designation of Bishops are conceded to
civil authorities.
Can. 378 §1 To be a suitable candidate
for the episcopate, a person must:
1° be outstanding in strong faith, good morals, piety,
zeal for souls, wisdom, prudence and human virtues, and possess those other
gifts which equip him to fulfil the office in question;
2° be held in good esteem;
3° be at least 35 years old;
4° be a priest ordained for at least five years;
5° hold a doctorate or at least a licentiate in sacred
Scripture, theology or canon law, from an institute of higher studies approved
by the Apostolic See, or at least be well versed in these disciplines.
§2 The definitive judgement on the suitability of the
person to be promoted rests with the Apostolic See.
Can. 379 Unless prevented by a
lawful reason, one who is promoted to the episcopate must receive episcopal
consecration within three months of receiving the apostolic letters, and in
fact before he takes possession of his office.
Can. 380 Before taking canonical
possession of his office, he who has been promoted is to make the profession of
faith and take the oath of fidelity to the Apostolic See, in accordance with
the formula approved by the same Apostolic See.
Can. 381 §1 In the diocese entrusted to
his care, the diocesan Bishop has all the ordinary, proper and immediate power
required for the exercise of his pastoral office, except in those matters which
the law or a decree of the Supreme Pontiff reserves to the supreme or to some
other ecclesiastical authority.
§2 Those who are at the head of the other communities
of the faithful mentioned in can. 368, are equivalent in law to the diocesan
Bishop unless the contrary is clear from the nature of things or from a
provision of the law.
Can. 382 §1 A person who is promoted to
the episcopate cannot become involved in the exercise of the office entrusted
to him before he has taken canonical possession of the diocese. However, he is
able to exercise offices which he already held in the same diocese at the time
of his promotion, without prejudice to can. 409 §2.
§2 Unless he is lawfully impeded, one who is not
already consecrated a Bishop and is now promoted to the office of diocesan
Bishop, must take canonical possession of his diocese within four months of
receiving the apostolic letters. If he is already consecrated, he must take
possession within two months of receiving the apostolic letters.
§3 A Bishop takes canonical possession of his diocese
when, personally or by proxy, he shows the apostolic letters to the college of
consultors, in the presence of the chancellor of the curia, who makes a record
of the fact. This must take place within the diocese. In dioceses which are
newly established he takes possession when he communicates the same letters to
the clergy and the people in the cathedral church, with the senior of the
priests present making a record of the fact.
§4 It is strongly recommended that the taking of
canonical possession be performed with a liturgical act in the cathedral
church, in the presence of the clergy and the people.
Can. 383 §1 In exercising his pastoral
office, the diocesan Bishop is to be solicitous for all Christ’s faithful
entrusted to his care, whatever their age, condition or nationality, whether
they live in the territory or are visiting there. He is to show an apostolic
spirit also to those who, because of their condition of life, are not
sufficiently able to benefit from ordinary pastoral care, and to those who have
lapsed from religious practice.
§2 If he has faithful of a different rite in his
diocese, he is to provide for their spiritual needs either by means of priests
or parishes of the same rite, or by an episcopal Vicar.
§3 He is to act with humanity and charity to those who
are not in full communion with the Catholic Church; he should also foster
ecumenism as it is understood by the Church.
§4 He is to consider the non‑baptised as
commended to him in the Lord, so that the charity of Christ, of which the
Bishop must be a witness to all, may shine also on them.
Can. 384 He is to have a special
concern for the priests, to whom he is to listen as his helpers and
counsellors. He is to defend their rights and ensure that they fulfil the
obligations proper to their state. He is to see that they have the means and
the institutions needed for the development of their spiritual and intellectual
life. He is to ensure that they are provided with adequate means of livelihood
and social welfare, in accordance with the law.
Can. 385 He must in a very special
way foster vocations to the various ministries and to consecrated life, having
a special care for priestly and missionary vocations.
Can. 386 §1 The diocesan Bishop is
bound to teach and illustrate to the faithful the truths of faith which are to
be believed and applied to behaviour. He is himself to preach frequently. He is
also to ensure that the provisions of the canons on the ministry of the word,
especially on the homily and catechetical instruction, are faithfully observed,
so that the whole of Christian teaching is transmitted to all.
§2 By whatever means seem most appropriate, he is
firmly to defend the integrity and unity of the faith to be believed. However,
he is to acknowledge a just freedom in the further investigation of truths.
Can. 387 Mindful that he is bound to
give an example of holiness, charity, humility and simplicity of life, the
diocesan Bishop is to seek in every way to promote the holiness of Christ’s
faithful according to the special vocation of each. Since he is the principal
dispenser of the mysteries of God, he is to strive constantly that Christ’s
faithful entrusted to his care may grow in grace through the celebration of the
sacraments, and may know and live the paschal mystery.
Can. 388 §1 After he has taken
possession of the diocese, the diocesan Bishop must apply the Mass for the
people entrusted to him on each Sunday and on each holyday of obligation in his
region.
§2 The Bishop must himself celebrate and apply the
Mass for the people on the days mentioned in §1; if, however, he is lawfully
impeded from so doing, he is to have someone else do so on those days, or do so
himself on other days.
§3 A Bishop who, in addition to his own, is given
another diocese, even as administrator, satisfies the obligation by applying
one Mass for all the people entrusted to him.
§4 A Bishop who has not satisfied the obligation
mentioned in §§1‑3, is to apply as soon as possible as many Masses for
the people as he has omitted.
Can. 389 He is frequently to preside
at the Eucharistic celebration in the cathedral church or in some other church
of his diocese, especially on holydays of obligation and on other solemnities.
Can. 390 The diocesan Bishop may use
pontificalia throughout his diocese. He may not do so
outside his diocese without the consent of the local Ordinary, either expressly
given or at least reasonably presumed.
Can. 391 §1 The diocesan Bishop governs
the particular Church entrusted to him with legislative, executive and judicial
power, in accordance with the law.
§2 The Bishop exercises legislative power himself. He
exercises executive power either personally or through Vicars general or
episcopal Vicars, in accordance with the law. He exercises judicial power
either personally or through a judicial Vicar and judges, in accordance with
the law.
Can. 392 §1 Since the Bishop must
defend the unity of the universal Church, he is bound to foster the discipline
which is common to the whole Church, and so press for the observance of all
ecclesiastical laws.
§2 He is to ensure that abuses do not creep into
ecclesiastical discipline, especially concerning the ministry of the word, the
celebration of the sacraments and sacramentals, the worship of God and the cult
of the saints, and the administration of goods.
Can. 393 In all juridical
transactions of the diocese, the diocesan Bishop acts in the person of the
diocese.
Can. 394 §1 The Bishop is to foster
various forms of the apostolate in his diocese and is to ensure that throughout
the entire diocese, or in its particular districts, all works of the apostolate
are coordinated under his direction, with due regard for the character of each
apostolate.
§2 He is to insist on the faithful’s obligation to
exercise the apostolate according to the condition and talents of each. He is
to urge them to take part in or assist various works of the apostolate,
according to the needs of place and time.
Can. 395 §1 The diocesan Bishop is
bound by the law of personal residence in his diocese, even if he has a
coadjutor or auxiliary Bishop.
§2 Apart from the visit ‘ad limina’, attendance at
councils or at the synod of Bishops or at the Episcopal Conference, at which he
must be present, or by reason of another office lawfully entrusted to him, he
may be absent from the diocese, for a just reason, for not
longer than one month, continuously or otherwise, provided he ensures
that the diocese is not harmed by this absence.
§3 He is not to be absent from his diocese on
Christmas Day, during Holy Week, or on Easter Sunday, Pentecost and Corpus
Christi, except for a grave and urgent reason.
§4 If the Bishop is unlawfully absent from the diocese
for more than six months, the Metropolitan is to notify the Holy See. If it is
the Metropolitan who is absent, the senior suffragan is to do the same.
Can. 396 §1 The Bishop is bound to
visit his diocese in whole or in part each year, so that at least every five
years he will have visited the whole diocese, either personally or, if he is
lawfully impeded, through the coadjutor or auxiliary Bishop, the Vicar general,
an episcopal Vicar or some other priest.
§2 The Bishop has a right to select any clerics he
wishes as his companions and helpers in a visitation, any contrary privilege or
custom being reprobated.
Can. 397 §1 Persons, Catholic
institutes, pious objects and places within the boundaries of the diocese, are
subject to ordinary episcopal visitation.
§2 The Bishop may visit the members of religious
institutes of pontifical right and their houses only in the cases stated in the
law.
Can. 398 The Bishop is to endeavour
to make his pastoral visitation with due diligence. He is to ensure that he is
not a burden to anyone on the ground of undue expense.
Can. 399 §1 Every five years the
diocesan Bishop is bound to submit to the Supreme Pontiff a report on the state
of the diocese entrusted to him, in the form and at the time determined by the
Apostolic See.
§2 If the year assigned for submitting this report
coincides in whole or in part with the first two years of his governance of the
diocese, for that occasion the Bishop need not draw up and submit the report.
[See Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022, arts. 38-42, on visits ad limina]
[See also the Final Document of the XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, 24.XI.2024, nos. 101, 125c), and 135, and the Accompanying Note by Pope Francis]
Can. 400 §1 Unless the Apostolic See
has decided otherwise, in the year in which he is bound to submit the report to
the Supreme Pontiff, the diocesan Bishop is to go to Rome to venerate the tombs
of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and to present himself to the Roman
Pontiff.
§2 The Bishop is to satisfy this obligation
personally, unless he is lawfully impeded; in which case he is to satisfy the
obligation through the coadjutor, if he has one, or the auxiliary, or a
suitable priest of his presbyterium
who resides in his diocese.
§3 A Vicar apostolic can satisfy this obligation
through a proxy, even through one residing in Rome. A
Prefect apostolic is not bound by this obligation.
Can. 401 §1 A diocesan Bishop who has
completed his seventy‑fifth year of age is requested to offer his
resignation from office to the Supreme Pontiff, who, taking all the
circumstances into account, will make provision accordingly.
§2 A diocesan Bishop who, because of illness or some other grave reason, has become unsuited for the fulfilment of his office, is earnestly requested to offer his resignation from office.
[See m.p. Learn to take your leave,
12.II.2018:
Art. 1. Upon reaching 75 years of age, diocesan and eparchial Bishops, and
those deemed equivalent to them according to canons 381 §2 CIC and 313 CCEO, as
well as Coadjutor and Auxiliary Bishops or holders of special pastoral
responsibilities, are invited to present to the Supreme Pontiff their
resignation from pastoral office.
Art. 2. Upon reaching 75 years of age, non-Cardinal Dicastery Heads of the
Roman Curia, Superior Prelates of the Roman Curia and Bishops holding other
offices of the Holy See, do not ipso facto cede their office, but must present
their resignation to the Supreme Pontiff.
Art. 3. Likewise, Pontifical Representatives do not ipso facto cede their
office upon reaching seventy-five years of age, but in this circumstance must
present their resignation to the Supreme Pontiff.
Art. 4. To be effective, resignation pursuant to articles 1-3 must be accepted
by the Supreme Pontiff, who will decide by evaluating the concrete
circumstances.
Art. 5. Once the resignation is presented, the office relative to articles 1-3
will be extended until acceptance of the resignation is communicated to the
interested party, for a fixed or unspecified time, contrary to the general
terms established by canons 189 §3 CIC and 970 §1 CCEO.]
Can. 402 §1 A Bishop whose resignation from office has been accepted, acquires the title ‘emeritus’ of his diocese. If he so wishes, he may have a residence in the diocese unless, because of special circumstances in certain cases, the Apostolic See provides otherwise.
[See Authentic
Interpretation of canon 402 §1, 10.X.1991, allowing emeritus bishops to be
elected as members]
§2 The Episcopal Conference must ensure that suitable
and worthy provision is made for the upkeep of a Bishop who has resigned,
bearing in mind the primary obligation which falls on the diocese which he
served.
Article 3: Coadjutor and Auxiliary Bishops
Can. 403 §1 When the pastoral needs of
the diocese require it, one or more auxiliary Bishops are to be appointed at
the request of the diocesan Bishop. An auxiliary Bishop does not have the right
of succession.
§2 In more serious circumstances, even of a personal
nature, the diocesan Bishop may be given an auxiliary Bishop with special
faculties.
§3 If the Holy See considers it more opportune, it can
ex officio appoint a coadjutor Bishop, who also has special faculties. A
coadjutor Bishop has the right of succession.
Can. 404 §1 The coadjutor Bishop takes
possession of his office when, either personally or by proxy, he shows the
apostolic letters of appointment to the diocesan Bishop and the college of
consultors, in the presence of the chancellor of the curia, who makes a record
of the fact.
§2 An auxiliary Bishop takes possession of his office
when he shows his apostolic letters of appointment to the diocesan Bishop, in
the presence of the chancellor of the curia, who makes a record of the fact.
§3 If the diocesan Bishop is wholly impeded, it is
sufficient that either the coadjutor Bishop or the auxiliary Bishop show their
apostolic letters of appointment to the college of consultors, in the presence
of the chancellor of the curia.
Can. 405 §1 The coadjutor Bishop and
the auxiliary Bishop have the obligations and the rights which are determined
by the provisions of the following canons and defined in their letters of
appointment.
§2 The coadjutor Bishop, or the auxiliary Bishop
mentioned in can. 403 §2, assists the diocesan Bishop in the entire governance
of the diocese, and takes his place when he is absent or impeded.
Can. 406 §1 The coadjutor Bishop, and
likewise the auxiliary Bishop mentioned in can. 403 §2, is to be appointed a
Vicar general by the diocesan Bishop. The diocesan Bishop is to entrust to him,
in preference to others, those things which by law require a special mandate.
§2 Unless the apostolic letters provide otherwise, and
without prejudice to the provision of §1, the diocesan Bishop is to appoint his
auxiliary or auxiliaries as Vicar general or at least episcopal Vicar, in
dependence solely on his authority, or on that of the coadjutor Bishop or of
the auxiliary Bishop mentioned in can. 403 §2.
[No. 71 c) of the Directory Apostolorum Successores, 22.II.2004, clarifies that the diocesan Bishop should not entrust the auxiliary Bishop with the care of a parish or with tasks of a purely marginal or occasional nature]
Can. 407 §1 For the greatest present
and future good of the diocese, the diocesan Bishop, the coadjutor and the
auxiliary Bishop mentioned in can. 403 §2, are to consult with each other on
matters of greater importance.
§2 In assessing matters of greater importance,
particularly those of a pastoral nature, the diocesan Bishop is to consult the
auxiliary Bishop before all others.
§3 The coadjutor Bishop and the auxiliary Bishop,
since they are called to share in the cares of the diocesan Bishop, should so
exercise their office that they act and think in accord with him.
Can. 408 §1 As often as they are
requested to do so by the diocesan Bishop, a coadjutor Bishop and an auxiliary
Bishop who are not lawfully impeded, are obliged to perform those pontifical
and other functions to which the diocesan Bishop is bound.
§2 Those episcopal rights and functions which the
coadjutor can exercise are not habitually to be entrusted to another by the
diocesan Bishop.
Can. 409 §1 When the episcopal see
falls vacant, the coadjutor immediately becomes the Bishop of the diocese for
which he was appointed, provided he has lawfully taken possession.
§2 Unless the competent authority has provided
otherwise, when the episcopal see is vacant and until the new Bishop takes
possession of the see, the auxiliary Bishop retains all and only those powers
and faculties which he had as Vicar general or as episcopal Vicar when the see
was occupied. If he is not appointed to the office of diocesan Administrator,
he is to exercise this same power of his, conferred by the law, under the
authority of the diocesan Administrator, who governs the diocese.
Can. 410 The coadjutor Bishop and
the auxiliary Bishop are bound, like the diocesan Bishop, to reside in the
diocese. Other than for the fulfilment of some duty outside the diocese, or for
holidays, which are not to be longer than one month, they may not be away from
the diocese except for a brief period.
Can. 411 The provisions of cann. 401 and 402 §2, concerning resignation from office, apply also to a coadjutor and an auxiliary Bishop.
[NB see m.p. Learn to take your leave,
12.II.2018, art. 5 (cf. can. 401)]
Can. 412 The episcopal see is
understood to be impeded if the diocesan Bishop is completely prevented from
exercising the pastoral office in the diocese by reason of imprisonment,
banishment, exile or incapacity, so that he is unable to communicate, even by
letter, with the people of his diocese.
Can. 413 §1 Unless the Holy See has
provided otherwise, when a see is impeded, the governance of the diocese
devolves on the coadjutor Bishop, if there is one. If there is no coadjutor, or
if he is impeded, it devolves upon the auxiliary Bishop, or the Vicar general,
or the episcopal Vicar, or another priest: the order of persons to be followed
is to be that determined in the list which the diocesan Bishop is to draw up as
soon as possible after taking possession of his diocese. This list, which is to
be communicated to the Metropolitan, is to be revised at least every three
years, and kept under secrecy by the chancellor.
§2 If there is no coadjutor Bishop or if he is
impeded, and the list mentioned in §1 is not at hand, it is the responsibility
of the college of consultors to elect a priest who will govern the diocese.
§3 The person who undertakes the governance of the
diocese according to the norms of §§1 or 2, is to notify the Holy See as soon
as possible that the see is impeded and that he has undertaken the office.
Can. 414 Whoever is called, in
accordance with can. 413, to exercise the pastoral care of the diocese for the
time being, that is, only for the period during which the see is impeded, is in
his pastoral care of the diocese bound by the obligations, and has the power,
which by law belong to the diocesan Administrator.
Can. 415 If the diocesan Bishop is
prohibited from exercising his office by reason of an ecclesiastical penalty,
the Metropolitan is to refer the matter at once to the Holy See, so that it may
make provision; if there is no Metropolitan, or if he is the one affected by
the penalty, it is the suffragan senior by promotion who is to refer the
matter.
Can. 416 The episcopal see becomes
vacant by the death of the diocesan Bishop, by his resignation accepted by the
Holy See, by transfer, or by deprivation notified to the Bishop.
Can. 417 Until they have received
certain notification of the Bishop’s death, all actions taken by the Vicar
general or the episcopal Vicar have effect. Until they have received certain
notification of the aforementioned papal acts, the same is true of actions taken
by the diocesan Bishop, the Vicar general or the episcopal Vicar.
Can. 418 §1 Within two months of
receiving certain notification of transfer, the Bishop must proceed to the
diocese to which he has been transferred and take canonical possession of it.
On the day on which he takes possession of the new diocese, the diocese from which
he has been transferred becomes vacant.
§2 In the period between receiving certain
notification of the transfer and taking possession of the new diocese, in the
diocese from which he is being transferred the Bishop:
1° has the power, and is bound by the obligations, of
a diocesan Administrator; all powers of the Vicar general and of the episcopal
Vicar cease, without prejudice to can. 409 §2;
2° receives the full remuneration proper to the
office.
Can. 419 While the see is vacant and
until the appointment of a diocesan Administrator, the governance of the
diocese devolves upon the auxiliary Bishop. If there are a number of auxiliary
Bishops, it devolves upon the senior by promotion. If there is no auxiliary
Bishop, it devolves upon the college of consultors, unless the Holy See has
provided otherwise. The one who thus assumes the governance of the diocese must
without delay convene the college which is competent to appoint a diocesan
Administrator.
Can. 420 Unless the Holy See has
prescribed otherwise, when the see is vacant in a vicariate or a prefecture
apostolic, the governance is assumed by the Pro‑Vicar or Pro‑Prefect
who was designated for this sole purpose by the Vicar or Prefect immediately
upon taking possession.
Can. 421 §1 Within eight days of
receiving notification of the vacancy of an episcopal see, a diocesan
Administrator is to be elected by the college of consultors, to govern the
diocese for the time being, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 502 §3.
§2 If, for any reason, the diocesan Administrator is
not lawfully elected within the prescribed time, his appointment devolves upon
the Metropolitan. If the metropolitan see is itself vacant, or if both the
metropolitan see and a suffragan see are vacant, the appointment devolves on
the suffragan who is senior by promotion.
Can. 422 The auxiliary Bishop or, if
there is none, the college of consultors, must as soon as possible notify the
Apostolic See of the death of the Bishop. The person elected as diocesan
Administrator must as soon as possible notify the Apostolic See of his election.
Can. 423 §1 Only one diocesan
Administrator is to be appointed, contrary customs being reprobated; otherwise
the election is invalid.
§2 The diocesan Administrator is not to be at the same
time the financial administrator. Accordingly, if the financial administrator
of the diocese is elected Administrator, the finance committee is to elect
another temporary financial administrator.
Can. 424 The diocesan Administrator
is to be elected according to the norms of cann. 165‑178.
Can. 425 §1 Only a priest who has
completed his thirty‑fifth year of age, and has not already been elected,
appointed or presented for the same see, can validly be deputed to the office
of diocesan Administrator.
§2 As diocesan Administrator a priest is to be elected
who is outstanding for doctrine and prudence.
§3 If the conditions prescribed in §1 have not been
observed, the Metropolitan or, if the metropolitan see itself is vacant, the
suffragan senior by promotion, having verified the truth of the matter, is to
appoint an Administrator for that occasion. The acts of a person elected
contrary to the provisions of §1 are by virtue of the law itself invalid.
Can. 426 Whoever governs the diocese
before the appointment of the diocesan Administrator, has the power which the
law gives to a Vicar general.
Can. 427 §1 The diocesan Administrator
is bound by the obligations and enjoys the power of a diocesan Bishop,
excluding those matters which are excepted by the nature of things or by the
law itself.
[No. 240 of the Directory Apostolorum Successores, 22.II.2004, clarifies that the diocesan administrator assumes ordinary power over the diocese. Nos. 241 and 242 set out his duties and the limits of his power. He has ipso iure the faculty of administering the sacrament of confirmation in his diocese and of granting this right to other priests: see Notitiae 35 (1999), 160]
§2 The diocesan Administrator obtains his power on his
acceptance of the election, without the need of confirmation from anyone, but
without prejudice to the provision of can. 833, n. 4.
Can. 428 §1 While the see is vacant, no
innovation is to be made.
§2 Those who have the interim governance of the
diocese are forbidden to do anything which could in any way prejudice the
rights of the diocese or of the Bishop. Both they, and in like manner any other
persons, are specifically forbidden to remove, destroy or in any way alter
documents of the diocesan curia, either personally or through another.
Can. 429 The diocesan Administrator
is bound by the obligations of residing in the diocese, and of applying the
Mass for the people in accordance with can. 388.
Can. 430 §1 The office of the diocesan
Administrator ceases when the new Bishop takes possession of the diocese.
§2 Removal of the diocesan Administrator is reserved
to the Holy See. Should he perchance resign, the resignation is to be submitted
in authentic form to the college which is competent to elect, but it does not
require acceptance by the college. If the diocesan Administrator is removed,
resigns or dies, another diocesan Administrator is to be elected in accordance
with can. 421.
Can. 431 Neighbouring particular
Churches are to be grouped into ecclesiastical provinces, with a certain
defined territory. The purpose of this grouping is to promote, according to the
circumstances of persons and place, a common pastoral action of various neighbouring
dioceses, and the more closely to foster relations between diocesan Bishops.
§2 From now onwards, as a rule, there are to be no
exempt dioceses. Accordingly, individual dioceses and other particular Churches
which exist within the territory of an ecclesiastical province, must be
included in that ecclesiastical province.
§3 It is the exclusive prerogative of the supreme
authority in the Church, after consulting the Bishops concerned, to establish,
suppress or alter ecclesiastical provinces.
Can. 432 §1 The provincial council and
the Metropolitan have authority over the ecclesiastical province, in accordance
with the law.
§2 By virtue of the law, an ecclesiastical province
has juridical personality.
Can. 433 §1 If it seems advantageous,
especially in countries where there are very many particular Churches, the Holy
See can, on the proposal of the Episcopal Conference, join together
neighbouring provinces into ecclesiastical regions.
§2 An ecclesiastical region can be constituted a
juridical person.
Can. 434 It is for a meeting of the Bishops of an ecclesiastical region to foster cooperation and common pastoral action in the region. However the powers given to Episcopal Conferences in the canons of this Code do not belong to such a meeting, unless some of these powers have been specially granted to it by the Holy See.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 434, 23.V.1988 clarifies that an auxiliary bishop
cannot undertake the role of president or vice-president at such meetings]
Can. 435 An ecclesiastical province
is presided over by a Metropolitan, who is Archbishop in his own diocese. The
office of Metropolitan is linked to an episcopal see, determined or approved by
the Roman Pontiff.
Can. 436 §1 Within the suffragan
dioceses, the Metropolitan is competent:
1° to see that faith and ecclesiastical discipline are
carefully observed and to notify the Roman Pontiff if there be any abuses;
2° for a reason approved beforehand by the Apostolic
See, to conduct a canonical visitation if the suffragan Bishop has neglected
it;
3° to appoint a diocesan Administrator in accordance
with cann. 421 §2 and 425 §3.
§2 Where circumstances require it, the Apostolic See
can give the Metropolitan special functions and power, to be determined in
particular law.
§3 The Metropolitan has no other power of governance
over suffragan dioceses. He can, however, celebrate sacred functions in all
churches as if he were a Bishop in his own diocese, provided, if it is the
cathedral church, the diocesan Bishop has been previously notified.
Can. 437 §1 The Metropolitan is obliged
to request the pallium from the Roman Pontiff, either personally or by proxy,
within three months of his episcopal consecration or, if he has already been
consecrated, of his canonical appointment. The pallium signifies the power
which, in communion with the Roman Church, the Metropolitan possesses by law in
his own province.
§2 The Metropolitan can wear the pallium, in
accordance with the liturgical laws, in any church of the ecclesiastical
province over which he presides, but not outside the province, not even with
the assent of the diocesan Bishop.
§3 If the Metropolitan is transferred to another
metropolitan see, he requires a new pallium.
Can. 438 The title of Patriarch or
Primate gives a prerogative of honour, but in the Latin Church does not carry
with it any power of governance, except in certain matters where an apostolic
privilege or approved custom establishes otherwise.
Can. 439 §1 A plenary council for all
the particular Churches of the same Episcopal Conference is to be celebrated as
often as the Episcopal Conference, with the approval of the Apostolic See,
considers it necessary or advantageous.
[See no. 25 of the Directory Apostolorum Successores, 22.II.2004: “Before granting approval, the Apostolic See needs to know the precise motive for convoking the council and also the topics or subjects to be discussed”]
§2 The norm laid down in §1 is valid also for a
provincial council to be celebrated in an ecclesiastical province whose
boundaries coincide with the boundaries of the country.
Can. 440 §1 A provincial council, for
the various particular Churches of the same ecclesiastical province, is
celebrated as often as, in the judgement of the majority of the diocesan
Bishops of the province, it is considered opportune, without prejudice to can.
439 §2.
§2 A provincial council may not be called while the
metropolitan see is vacant.
Can. 441 It is the responsibility of
the Episcopal Conference:
1° to convene a plenary council;
2° to choose a place within the territory of the
Episcopal Conference for the celebration of the council;
3° to elect from among the diocesan Bishops a
president of the plenary council, who is to be approved by the Apostolic See;
4° to determine the order of business and the matters
to be considered, to announce when the plenary council is to begin and how long
it is to last, and to transfer, prorogue and dissolve it.
Can. 442 §1 It is the responsibility of
the Metropolitan, with the consent of the majority of the suffragan Bishops:
1° to convene a provincial council
2° to choose a place within the territory of the
province for the celebration of the provincial council;
3° to determine the order of business and the matters
to be considered, to announce when the provincial council is to begin and how
long it is to last, and to transfer, prorogue and dissolve it.
§2 It is the prerogative of the Metropolitan to
preside over the provincial council. If he is lawfully impeded from doing so,
it is the prerogative of a suffragan Bishop elected by the other suffragan
Bishops.
Can. 443 §1 The following have the
right to be summoned to particular councils and have the right to a
deliberative vote:
1° diocesan Bishops;
2° coadjutor and auxiliary Bishops
3° other titular Bishops who have been given a special
function in the territory, either by the Apostolic See or by the Episcopal
Conference.
§2 Other titular Bishops who are living in the
territory, even if they are retired, may be invited to particular councils;
they have the right to a deliberative vote.
§3 The following are to be invited to particular
councils, but with only a consultative vote:
1° Vicars general and episcopal Vicars of all the
particular Churches in the territory;
2° the major Superiors of religious institutes and
societies of apostolic life. Their number, for both men and women, is to be
determined by the Episcopal Conference or the Bishops of the province, and they
are to be elected respectively by all the major Superiors of institutes and
societies which have a centre in the territory;
3° the rectors of ecclesiastical and Catholic
universities which have a centre in the territory, together with the deans of
their faculties of theology and canon law;
4° some rectors of major seminaries, their number
being determined as in no. 2; they are to be elected by the rectors of
seminaries situated in the territory.
§4 Priests and others of Christ’s faithful may also be
invited to particular councils, but have only a consultative vote; their number
is not to exceed half of those mentioned in 1‑3.
§5 The cathedral chapter, the council of priests and
the pastoral council of each particular Church are to be invited to provincial
councils, but in such a way that each is to send two members, designated in a
collegial manner. They have only a consultative vote.
§6 Others may be invited to particular councils as
guests, if this is judged expedient by the Episcopal Conference for a plenary
council, or by the Metropolitan with the suffragan Bishops for a provincial
council.
Can. 444 §1 All who are summoned to
particular councils must attend, unless they are prevented by a just
impediment, of whose existence they are obliged to notify the president of the
council.
§2 Those who are summoned to a particular council in
which they have a deliberative vote, but who are prevented from attending
because of a just impediment, can send a proxy. The proxy, however, has only a
consultative vote.
Can. 445 A particular council is to
ensure that the pastoral needs of the people of God in its territory are
provided for. While it must always respect the universal law of the Church, it
has power of governance, especially legislative power. It can, therefore, determine
whatever seems opportune for an increase of faith, for the ordering of common
pastoral action, for the direction of morality and for the preservation,
introduction and defence of a common ecclesiastical discipline.
Can. 446 When a particular council
has concluded, the president is to ensure that all the acts of the council are
sent to the Apostolic See. The decrees drawn up by the council are not to be
promulgated until they have been reviewed by the Apostolic See. The council has
the responsibility of defining the manner in which the decrees will be
promulgated and the time when the promulgated decrees will begin to oblige.
[On the juridical nature and scope of the review (recognitio)
see Explanatory
Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 28.IV.2006]
[See also the Final Document of the XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, 24.XI.2024, no. 129]
Can. 447 The Episcopal Conference, a
permanent institution, is the assembly of the Bishops of a country or of a
certain territory, exercising together certain pastoral offices for Christ’s
faithful of that territory. By forms and means of apostolate suited to the
circumstances of time and place, it is to promote, in accordance with the law,
that greater good which the Church offers to all people.
Can. 448 §1 As a general rule, the
Episcopal Conference includes those who preside over all the particular
Churches of the same country, in accordance with can. 450.
§2 An Episcopal Conference can, however, be
established for a territory of greater or less extent if the Apostolic See,
after consultation with the diocesan Bishops concerned, judges that
circumstances suggest this. Such a Conference would include only the Bishops of
some particular Churches in a certain territory, or those who preside over
particular Churches in different countries. It is for the Apostolic See to lay
down special norms for each case.
Can. 449 §1 It is for the supreme
authority of the Church alone, after consultation with the Bishops concerned,
to establish, suppress, or alter Episcopal Conferences.
§2 An Episcopal Conference lawfully established has
juridical personality by virtue of the law itself.
Can. 450 §1 By virtue of the law, the
following persons in the territory belong to the Episcopal Conference: all
diocesan Bishops and those equivalent to them in law; all coadjutor Bishops,
auxiliary Bishops and other titular Bishops who exercise in the territory a
special office assigned to them by the Apostolic See or by the Episcopal
Conference. Ordinaries of another rite may be invited, but have only a
consultative vote, unless the statutes of the Episcopal Conference decree
otherwise.
§2 The other titular Bishops and the Legate of the
Roman Pontiff are not by law members of the Episcopal Conference.
[In relation to religious superiors, an Explanatory Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 30.XI.1996, clarifies that those who are not bishops or equivalent in law to bishops are not to be allowed general and quasi-permanent membership of an Episcopal Conference]
Can. 451 Each Episcopal Conference
is to draw up its own statutes, to be reviewed by the Apostolic See. In these,
among other things, arrangements for the plenary meetings of the Conference are
to be set out, and provision is to be made for a permanent committee of
Bishops, and a general secretary of the Conference, and for other offices and
commissions by which, in the judgement of the Conference, its purpose can more
effectively be achieved.
Can. 452 §1 Each Episcopal Conference
is to elect its president and determine who, in the lawful absence of the
president, will exercise the function of vice‑president. It is also to
designate a general secretary, in accordance with the statutes.
§2 The president of the Conference or, when he is lawfully impeded, the vice‑president, presides not only over the general meetings of the Conference but also over the permanent committee.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 452, 23.V.1988 clarifies that an auxiliary bishop
cannot undertake the role of president or vice-president of an Episcopal
Conference]
Can. 453 Plenary meetings of the
Episcopal Conference are to be held at least once a year, and moreover as often
as special circumstances require, in accordance with the provisions of the
statutes.
Can. 454 §1 By virtue of the law
diocesan Bishops, those equivalent to them in law and coadjutor Bishops have a
deliberative vote in plenary meetings of the Episcopal Conference.
§2 Auxiliary Bishops and other titular Bishops who
belong to the Episcopal Conference have a deliberative or consultative vote
according to the provisions of the statutes of the Conference. Only those
mentioned in §1, however, have a deliberative vote in the making or changing of
the statutes.
Can. 455 §1 The Episcopal Conference can make general decrees only in cases where the universal law has so prescribed, or by special mandate of the Apostolic See, either on its own initiative or at the request of the Conference itself.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 455 §1, 5.VII.1985 extends this to all normative
acts in general, and to general executory decrees in particular (not therefore
singular decrees)]
§2 For the decrees mentioned in §1 validly to be
enacted at a plenary meeting, they must receive two thirds of the votes of
those who belong to the Conference with a deliberative vote. These decrees do
not oblige until they have been reviewed by the Apostolic See and lawfully
promulgated.
[On the juridical nature and scope of the review (recognitio) see Explanatory Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 28.IV.2006]
§3 The manner of promulgation and the time they come
into force are determined by the Episcopal Conference.
§4 In cases where neither the universal law nor a
special mandate of the Apostolic See gives the Episcopal Conference the power
mentioned in §1, the competence of each diocesan Bishop remains intact. In such
cases, neither the Conference nor its president can act in the name of all the
Bishops unless each and every Bishop has given his consent.
Can. 456 When a plenary meeting of
the Episcopal Conference has been concluded, its minutes are to be sent by the
president to the Apostolic See for information, and its decrees, if any, for
review.
[On the juridical nature and scope of the review (recognitio) see Explanatory Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 28.IV.2006]
Can. 457 The permanent committee of
Bishops is to prepare the agenda for the plenary meetings of the Conference,
and it is to ensure that the decisions taken at those meetings are duly
executed. It is also to conduct whatever other business is entrusted to it in
accordance with the statutes.
Can. 458 The general secretary is
to:
1° prepare an account of the acts and decrees of the
plenary meetings of the Conference, as well as the acts of the permanent
committee of Bishops and to communicate these to all members of the Conference;
also to record whatever other acts are entrusted to him by the president or the
permanent committee;
2° to communicate to neighbouring Episcopal
Conferences such acts and documents as the Conference at a plenary meeting or
the permanent committee of Bishops decides to send to them.
Can. 459 §1 Relations are to be
fostered between Episcopal Conferences, especially neighbouring ones, in order
to promote and defend whatever is for the greater good.
§2 The Apostolic See must be consulted whenever
actions or affairs undertaken by Conferences have an international character.
Can. 460 The diocesan synod is an
assembly of selected priests and other members of Christ’s faithful of a
particular Church which, for the good of the whole diocesan community, assists
the diocesan Bishop, in accordance with the following canons.
Can. 461 §1 The diocesan synod is to be
held in each particular Church when the diocesan Bishop, after consulting the
council of priests, judges that the circumstances suggest it.
§2 If a Bishop is responsible for a number of
dioceses, or has charge of one as his own and of another as Administrator, he
may convene one diocesan synod for all the dioceses entrusted to him.
Can. 462 §1 Only the diocesan Bishop
can convene a diocesan synod. A person who has interim charge of a diocese
cannot do so.
§2 The diocesan Bishop presides over the diocesan
synod. He may however, delegate a Vicar general or an episcopal Vicar to fulfil
this office at individual sessions of the synod.
Can. 463 §1 The following are to be
summoned to the diocesan synod as members and they are obliged to participate
in it:
1° the coadjutor Bishop and the auxiliary Bishops;
2° the Vicars general and episcopal Vicars, and the
judicial Vicar
3° the canons of the cathedral church;
4° the members of the council of priests;
5° lay members of Christ’s faithful, not excluding
members of institutes of consecrated life, to be elected by the pastoral
council in the manner and the number to be determined by the diocesan Bishop
or, where this council does not exist, on a basis determined by the diocesan
Bishop;
6° the rector of the major seminary of the diocese;
7° the vicars forane;
8° at least one priest from each vicariate forane to
be elected by all those who have the care of souls there; another priest is
also to be elected, to take the place of the first if he is prevented from
attending;
9° some Superiors of religious institutes and of
societies of apostolic life which have a house in the diocese: these are to be
elected in the number and the manner determined by the diocesan Bishop.
§2 The diocesan Bishop may also invite others to be
members of the diocesan synod, whether clerics or members of institutes of
consecrated life or lay members of the faithful.
§3 If the diocesan Bishop considers it opportune, he
may invite to the diocesan Synod as observers some ministers or members of
Churches or ecclesial communities which are not in full communion with the Catholic
Church.
Can. 464 A member of the synod who
is lawfully impeded from attending, cannot send a proxy to attend in his or her
place, but is to notify the diocesan Bishop of the reason for not attending.
Can. 465 All questions proposed are
to be subject to the free discussion of the members in the sessions of the
synod.
Can. 466 The diocesan Bishop is the
sole legislator in the diocesan synod. Other members of the synod have only a
consultative vote. The diocesan Bishop alone signs the synodal declarations and
decrees, and only by his authority may these be published.
Can. 467 The diocesan Bishop is to
communicate the text of the declarations and decrees of the synod to the
Metropolitan and to the Episcopal Conference.
Can. 468 §1 If he judges it prudent,
the diocesan Bishop can suspend or dissolve the diocesan synod.
§2 Should the episcopal see become vacant or impeded,
the diocesan synod is by virtue of the law itself suspended, until such time as
the diocesan Bishop who succeeds to the see decrees that it be continued or
declares it terminated.
Can. 469 The diocesan curia is
composed of those institutes and persons who assist the Bishop in governing the
entire diocese, especially in directing pastoral action, in providing for the
administration of the diocese, and in exercising judicial power.
Can. 470 The appointment of those
who fulfil an office in the diocesan curia belongs to the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 471 All who are admitted to an
office in the curia must:
1° promise to fulfil their office faithfully, as
determined by law or by the Bishop;
2° observe secrecy within the limits and according to the manner determined by law or by the Bishop.
[Vos estis lux mundi, 25.III.2023, art. 4 §1 states that to make a
report pursuant to art. 3 of the same document shall not constitute a violation
of confidentiality]
Can. 472 The provisions of Book VII
on ‘Processes’ are to be observed concerning cases and persons involved in the
exercise of judicial power in the curia. The following canons are to be
observed in what concerns the administration of the diocese.
Can. 473 §1 The diocesan Bishop must
ensure that everything concerning the administration of the whole diocese is
properly coordinated and is directed in the way that will best achieve the good
of that portion of the people of God entrusted to his care.
§2 The diocesan Bishop has the responsibility of
coordinating the pastoral action of the Vicars general and episcopal Vicars.
Where it is useful, he may appoint a Moderator of the curia, who must be a
priest Under the Bishop’s authority, the Moderator is to coordinate activities
concerning administrative matters and to ensure that the others who belong to
the curia properly fulfil the offices entrusted to them.
§3 Unless in the Bishop’s judgement local conditions
suggest otherwise, the Vicar general is to be appointed Moderator of the curia
or, if there are several Vicars general, one of them.
§4 Where the Bishop judges it useful for the better
promotion of pastoral action, he can establish an episcopal council, comprising
the Vicars general and episcopal Vicars.
Can. 474 Acts of the curia which of
their nature are designed to have a juridical effect must, as a requirement for
validity, be signed by the Ordinary from whom they emanate. They must also be
signed by the chancellor of the curia or a notary. The chancellor is bound to
notify the Moderator of the curia about these acts.
Article 1: Vicars General and Episcopal Vicars
Can. 475 §1 In each diocese the
diocesan Bishop is to appoint a Vicar general to assist him in the governance of
the whole diocese. The Vicar general has ordinary power, in accordance with the
following canons.
§2 As a general rule, one Vicar general is to be
appointed, unless the size of the diocese, the number of inhabitants, or other
pastoral reasons suggest otherwise.
Can. 476 As often as the good
governance of the diocese requires it, the diocesan Bishop can also appoint one
or more episcopal Vicars. These have the same ordinary power as the universal
law gives to a Vicar general, in accordance with the following canons. The
competence of an episcopal Vicar, however, is limited to a determined part of
the diocese, or to a specific type of activity, or to the faithful of a
particular rite, or to certain groups of people.
Can. 477 §1 The Vicar general and the
episcopal Vicar are freely appointed by the diocesan Bishop, and can be freely
removed by him, without prejudice to can. 406. An episcopal Vicar who is not an
auxiliary Bishop, is to be appointed for a period of time, which is to be
specified in the act of appointment.
§2 If the Vicar general is absent or lawfully impeded,
the diocesan Bishop can appoint another to take his place. The same norm
applies in the case of an episcopal Vicar.
Can. 478 §1 The Vicar general and the
episcopal Vicar are to be priests of not less than thirty years of age, with a
doctorate or licentiate in canon law or theology, or at least well versed in
these disciplines. They are to be known for their sound doctrine, integrity,
prudence and practical experience.
§2 The office of Vicar general or episcopal Vicar may
not be united with the office of canon penitentiary, nor may the office be
given to blood relations of the Bishop up to the fourth degree.
Can. 479 §1 In virtue of his
office, the Vicar general has the same executive power throughout the whole
diocese as that which belongs by law to the diocesan Bishop: that is, he can
perform all administrative acts, with the exception however of those which the
Bishop has reserved to himself, or which by law require a special mandate of
the Bishop.
§2 By virtue of the law itself, the episcopal Vicar
has the same power as that mentioned in §1, but only for the determined part of
the territory or type of activity, or for the faithful of the determined rite
or group, for which he was appointed; matters which the Bishop reserves to
himself or to the Vicar general, or which by law require a special mandate of
the Bishop, are excepted.
§3 Within the limits of their competence, the Vicar
general and the episcopal Vicar have also those habitual faculties which the
Apostolic See has granted to the Bishop. They may also execute rescripts,
unless it is expressly provided otherwise, or unless the execution was
entrusted to the Bishop on a personal basis.
Can. 480 The Vicar general and
episcopal Vicar must give a report to the diocesan Bishop concerning more
important matters, both those yet to be attended to and those already dealt
with. They are never to act against the will and mind of the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 481 §1 The power of the Vicar
general or episcopal Vicar ceases when the period of their mandate expires, or
by resignation. In addition, but without prejudice to cann.
406 and 409, it ceases when they are notified of their removal by the diocesan
Bishop, or when the episcopal see falls vacant.
§2 When the office of the diocesan Bishop is
suspended, the power of the Vicar general and of the episcopal Vicar is
suspended, unless they are themselves Bishops.
Article 2: The Chancellor, other Notaries and the Archives
Can. 482 §1 In each curia a chancellor
is to be appointed, whose principal office, unless particular law states
otherwise, is to ensure that the acts of the curia are drawn up and dispatched,
and that they are kept safe in the archive of the curia.
§2 If it is considered necessary, the chancellor may
be given an assistant, who is to be called the vice‑chancellor.
§3 The chancellor and vice‑chancellor are
automatically notaries and secretaries of the curia.
Can. 483 §1 Besides the chancellor,
other notaries may be appointed, whose writing or signature authenticates
public documents. These notaries may be appointed for all acts, or for judicial
acts alone, or only for acts concerning a particular issue or business.
§2 The chancellor and notaries must be of unblemished
reputation and above suspicion. In cases which could involve the reputation of
a priest, the notary must be a priest.
Can. 484 The office of notary
involves:
1° writing acts and documents concerning decrees,
arrangements, obligations, and other matters which require their intervention;
2° faithfully recording in writing what is done, and
signing the document, with a note of the place, the day, the month and the
year;
3° while observing all that must be observed, showing
acts or documents from the archives to those who lawfully request them, and
verifying that copies conform to the original.
Can. 485 The chancellor and the
other notaries can be freely removed by the diocesan Bishop. They can be
removed by a diocesan Administrator only with the consent of the college of
consultors.
Can. 486 §1 All documents concerning
the diocese or parishes must be kept with the greatest of care.
§2 In each curia there is to be established in a safe
place a diocesan archive where documents and writings concerning both the
spiritual and the temporal affairs of the diocese are to be properly filed and
carefully kept under lock and key.
§3 An inventory or catalogue is to be made of
documents kept in the archive, with a short synopsis of each document.
Can. 487 §1 The archive must be locked,
and only the Bishop and the chancellor are to have the key; no one may be
allowed to enter unless with the permission of the Bishop, or with the
permission of both the Moderator of the curia and the chancellor.
§2 Persons concerned have the right to receive,
personally or by proxy, an authentic written or photostat copy of documents
which are of their nature public and which concern their own personal status.
Can. 488 It is not permitted to
remove documents from the archive, except for a short time and with the
permission of the Bishop or of both the Moderator of the curia and the
chancellor.
Can. 489 §1 In the diocesan curia there
is also to be a secret archive, or at least in the ordinary archive there is to
be a safe or cabinet, which is securely closed and bolted and which cannot be
removed. In this archive documents which are to be kept under secrecy are to be
most carefully guarded.
§2 Each year documents of criminal cases concerning
moral matters are to be destroyed whenever the guilty parties have died, or ten
years have elapsed since a condemnatory sentence concluded the affair. A short
summary of the facts is to be kept, together with the text of the definitive
judgement.
Can. 490 §1 Only the Bishop is to have
the key of the secret archive.
§2 When the see is vacant, the secret archive or safe
is not to be opened except in a case of real necessity, and then by the
diocesan Administrator personally.
§3 Documents are not to be removed from the secret
archive or safe.
Can. 491 §1 The diocesan Bishop is to
ensure that the acts and documents of the archives of cathedral, collegiate,
parochial and other churches in his territory are carefully kept and that two
copies are made of inventories or catalogues. One of these copies is to remain
in its own archive, the other is to be kept in the diocesan archive.
§2 The diocesan Bishop is to ensure that there is an
historical archive in the diocese, and that documents which have an historical
value are carefully kept in it and systematically filed.
§3 In order that the acts and documents mentioned in
§§1 and 2 may be inspected or removed, the norms laid down by the diocesan
Bishop are to be observed.
ARTICLE 3: THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Can. 492 §1 In each diocese a finance
committee is to be established, presided over by the diocesan Bishop or his
delegate. It is to be composed of at least three of the faithful, expert in
financial affairs and civil law, of outstanding integrity, and appointed by the
Bishop.
§2 The members of the finance committee are appointed
for five years but when this period has expired they may be appointed for
further terms of five years.
§3 Persons related to the Bishop up to the fourth
degree of consanguinity or affinity are excluded from the finance committee.
Can. 493 Besides the functions
entrusted to it in Book V on ‘The Temporal Goods of the Church’, it is the
responsibility of the finance committee to prepare each year a budget of income
and expenditure over the coming year for the governance of the whole diocese,
in accordance with the direction of the diocesan Bishop. It is also the
responsibility of the committee to account at the end of the year for income
and expenditure.
Can. 494 §1 In each diocese a financial
administrator is to be appointed by the Bishop, after consulting the college of
consultors and the finance committee. The financial administrator is to be
expert in financial matters and of truly outstanding integrity.
§2 The financial administrator is to be appointed for
five years, but when this period has expired, may be appointed for further
terms of five years. While in office he or she is not to be removed except for
a grave reason, to be estimated by the Bishop after consulting the college of
consultors and the finance committee.
§3 It is the responsibility of the financial
administrator, under the authority of the Bishop, to administer the goods of
the diocese in accordance with the plan of the finance committee, and to make
those payments from diocesan funds which the Bishop or his delegates have
lawfully authorised.
§4 At the end of the year the financial administrator
must give the finance committee an account of income and expenditure.
Can. 495 §1 In each diocese there is to
be established a council of priests, that is, a group of priests who represent
the presbyterium and who are to be,
as it were, the Bishop’s senate. The council’s role is to assist the Bishop, in
accordance with the law, in the governance of the diocese, so that the pastoral
welfare of that portion of the people of God entrusted to the Bishop may be
most effectively promoted.
§2 In vicariates and prefectures apostolic, the Vicar
or Prefect is to appoint a council composed of at least three missionary
priests, whose opinion, even by letter, he is to hear in the more serious
affairs.
Can. 496 The council of priests is
to have its own statutes. These are to be approved by the diocesan Bishop,
having taken account of the norms laid down by the Episcopal Conference.
Can. 497 As far as the designation
of the members of the council of priests is concerned:
1° about half are to be freely elected by the priests
themselves in accordance with the canons which follow and with the statutes;
2° some priests must, in accordance with the statutes,
be members ex officio, that is belong to the council by reason of the office
they hold;
3° the diocesan Bishop may freely appoint some others.
Can. 498 §1 The following have the
right to both an active and a passive voice in an election to the council of
priests:
1° all secular priests incardinated in the diocese;
2° priests who are living in the diocese and exercise
some useful office there, whether they be secular priests not incardinated in
the diocese, or priest members of religious institutes or of societies of
apostolic life.
§2 Insofar as the statutes so provide, the same right
of election may be given to other priests who have a domicile or quasi‑domicile
in the diocese.
Can. 499 The manner of electing the
members of the council of priests is to be determined by the statutes, and in
such a way that as far as possible the priests of the presbyterium are represented, with special regard to the diversity
of ministries and to the various regions of the diocese.
Can. 500 §1 It is the prerogative of
the diocesan Bishop to convene the council of priests, to preside over it, and
to determine the matters to be discussed in it or to accept items proposed by
the members.
§2 The council of priests has only a consultative
vote. The diocesan Bishop is to consult it in matters of more serious moment,
but he requires its consent only in the cases expressly defined in the law.
§3 The council of priests can never act without the
diocesan Bishop. He alone can make public those things which have been decided
in accordance with §2.
Can. 501 §1 The members of the council
of priests are to be designated for a period specified in the statutes, subject
however to the condition that over a five year period the council is renewed in
whole or in part.
§2 When the see is vacant, the council of priests
lapses and its functions are fulfilled by the college of consultors. The Bishop
must reconstitute the council of priests within a year of taking possession.
§3 If the council of priests does not fulfil the
office entrusted to it for the welfare of the diocese, or if it gravely abuses
that office, it can be dissolved by the diocesan Bishop, after consultation
with the Metropolitan, in the case of a metropolitan see, the Bishop must first
consult with the suffragan Bishop who is senior by promotion. Within a year,
however, the diocesan Bishop must reconstitute the council.
Can. 502 §1 From among the members of the council of priests, the diocesan Bishop freely appoints not fewer than six and not more than twelve priests, who are for five years to constitute the college of consultors. To it belong the functions determined by law; on the expiry of the five year period, however, it continues to exercise its functions until the new college is constituted.
[According to an Authentic
Interpretation of canon 502 §1, 11.VII.1984, a member of the college of
consultors who ceases to be a member of the council of priests remains in
office as consultor; also, a consultor who ceases from office during the five
year period needs to be replaced only if the number of consultors falls below
six]
§2 The diocesan Bishop presides over the college of
consultors. If, however, the see is impeded or vacant, that person presides who
in the interim takes the Bishop’s place or, if he has not yet been appointed,
then the priest in the college of consultors who is senior by ordination.
§3 The Episcopal Conference can determine that the
functions of the college of consultors be entrusted to the cathedral chapter.
§4 Unless the law provides otherwise, in a vicariate
or prefecture apostolic the functions of the college of consultors belong to
the council of the mission mentioned in can. 495 §2.
Can. 503 A chapter of canons,
whether cathedral or collegiate, is a college of priests, whose role is to
celebrate the more solemn liturgical functions in a cathedral or a collegiate
church. It is for the cathedral chapter, besides, to fulfil those roles entrusted
to it by law or by the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 504 The establishment,
alteration or suppression of a cathedral chapter is reserved to the Apostolic
See.
Can. 505 Every chapter, whether
cathedral or collegiate, is to have its own statutes, established by lawful
capitular act and approved by the diocesan Bishop. These statutes are not to be
changed or abrogated except with the approval of the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 506 §1 The statutes of a chapter,
while preserving always the laws of the foundation, are to determine the nature
of the chapter and the number of canons. They are to define what the chapter
and the individual canons are to do in carrying out divine worship and their
ministry. They are to decide the meetings at which chapter business is
conducted and, while observing the provisions of the universal law, they are to
prescribe the conditions required for the validity and for the lawfulness of
the proceedings.
§2 In the statutes the remuneration is also to be
defined, both the fixed salary and the amounts to be paid on the occasion of
discharging the office, so too, having taken account of the norms laid down by
the Holy See, the insignia of the canons.
Can. 507 §1 Among the canons there is
to be one who presides over the chapter. In accordance with the statutes other
offices are also to be established, account having been taken of the practice
prevailing in the region.
§2 Other offices may be allotted to clerics not
belonging to the chapter, so that, in accordance with the statutes, they may
provide assistance to the canons.
Can. 508 §1 The canon penitentiary both
of a cathedral church and of a collegiate church has by law ordinary faculties,
which he cannot however delegate to others, to absolve in the sacramental forum
from latae sententiae censures which have not been
declared and are not reserved to the Holy See. Within the diocese he can
absolve not only diocesans but outsiders also, whereas he can absolve diocesans
even outside the diocese.
§2 Where there is no chapter, the diocesan Bishop is
to appoint a priest to fulfil this office.
Can. 509 §1 It belongs to the diocesan Bishop, after consultation with the chapter, but not to the diocesan Administrator, to bestow each and every canonry both in the cathedral church and in a collegiate church, any privilege to the contrary is revoked. It is also for the diocesan Bishop to confirm the person elected by the chapter to preside over it.
[Election of a president is not compulsory: see Authentic
Interpretation of canon 509 §1, 20.V.1989]
§2 The diocesan Bishop is to appoint to canonries only
priests who are of sound doctrine and life and who have exercised a
praiseworthy ministry.
Can. 510 §1 Parishes are no longer to
be united with chapters of canons. Those which are united to a chapter are to
be separated from it by the diocesan Bishop.
§2 In a church which is at the same time a parochial
and a capitular church, a parish priest is to be appointed, whether chosen from
the chapter or not. He is bound by all the obligations and he enjoys all the
rights and faculties which by law belong to a parish priest.
§3 The diocesan Bishop is to establish certain norms
whereby the pastoral duties of the parish priest and the roles proper to the
chapter are duly harmonised, so that the parish priest is not a hindrance to
capitular functions, nor the chapter to those of the parish. Any conflicts
which may arise are to be settled by the diocesan Bishop, who is to ensure
above all that the pastoral needs of the faithful are suitably provided for.
§4 Alms given to a church which is at the same time a
parochial and a capitular church, are presumed to be given to the parish,
unless it is otherwise established.
Can. 511 In each diocese, in so far
as pastoral circumstances suggest, a pastoral council is to be established. Its
function, under the authority of the Bishop, is to study and weigh those
matters which concern the pastoral works in the diocese, and to propose practical
conclusions concerning them.
Can. 512 §1 A pastoral council is
composed of members of Christ’s faithful who are in full communion with the Catholic
Church: clerics, members of institutes of consecrated life, and especially lay
people. They are designated in the manner determined by the diocesan Bishop.
§2 The members of Christ’s faithful assigned to the
pastoral council are to be selected in such a way that the council truly
reflects the entire portion of the people of God which constitutes the diocese,
taking account of the different regions of the diocese, of social conditions
and professions, and of the part played in the apostolate by the members,
whether individually or in association with others.
§3 Only those members of Christ’s faithful who are
outstanding in firm faith, high moral standards and prudence are to be assigned
to the pastoral council.
Can. 513 §1 The pastoral council is
appointed for a determinate period, in accordance with the provisions of the
statutes drawn up by the Bishop.
§2 When the see is vacant, the pastoral council
lapses.
Can. 514 §1 The pastoral council has
only a consultative vote. It is for the diocesan Bishop alone to convene it,
according to the needs of the apostolate, and to preside over it. He alone has
the right to make public the matters dealt with in the council.
§2 It is to be convened at least once a year.
Can. 515 §1 A parish is a certain
community of Christ’s faithful stably established within a particular Church,
whose pastoral care, under the authority of the diocesan Bishop, is entrusted
to a parish priest as its proper pastor.
§2 The diocesan Bishop alone can establish, suppress
or alter parishes. He is not to establish, suppress or notably alter them
unless he has consulted the council of priests.
[For details of how to proceed with the establishment of parish groupings, see Congregation for the Clergy, Instruction The pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, nos. 46-51]
§3 A lawfully established parish has juridical
personality by virtue of the law itself.
Can. 516 §1 Unless the law provides
otherwise, a quasi‑parish is equivalent to a parish. A quasi‑parish
is a certain community of Christ’s faithful within a particular Church,
entrusted to a priest as its proper pastor, but because of special
circumstances not yet established as a parish.
§2 Where some communities cannot be established as
parishes or quasi‑parishes, the diocesan Bishop is to provide for their
spiritual care in some other way.
Can. 517 §1 Where
circumstances so require, the pastoral care of a parish, or of a number of
parishes together, can be entrusted to several priests jointly, but with the
stipulation that one of the priests is to be the moderator of the pastoral care
to be exercised. This moderator is to direct the joint action and to be
responsible for it to the Bishop.
[According to
the Congregation for the Clergy’s Instruction The
pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising
mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, no. 88, the moderator of pastoral
care has the powers and functions of a parish priest, albeit without an office
with its rights and duties]
§2 If, because of a shortage of priests, the diocesan
Bishop has judged that a deacon, or some other person who is not a priest, or a
community of persons, should be entrusted with a share in the exercise of the
pastoral care of a parish, he is to appoint some priest who, with the powers
and faculties of a parish priest, will direct the pastoral care.
Can. 518 As a general rule, a parish
is to be territorial, that is, it is to embrace all Christ’s faithful of a
given territory. Where it is useful however, personal parishes are to be
established, determined by reason of the rite, language or nationality of the
faithful of a certain territory, or on some other basis.
Can. 519 The parish priest is the
proper pastor of the parish entrusted to him. He exercises the pastoral care of
the community entrusted to him under the authority of the diocesan Bishop,
whose ministry of Christ he is called to share, so that for this community he
may carry out the offices of teaching, sanctifying and ruling with the
cooperation of other priests or deacons and with the assistance of lay members
of Christ’s faithful, in accordance with the law.
[See also the description
of the office of parish priest in Congregation
for the Clergy, Instruction The
pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising
mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, nos. 66-74]
Can. 520 §1 A juridical person may not
be a parish priest. However, the diocesan Bishop, but not the diocesan
Administrator, can, with the consent of the competent Superior, entrust a
parish to a clerical religious institute or to a clerical society of apostolic
life, even by establishing it in the church of the institute or society,
subject however to the rule that one priest be the parish priest or, if the
pastoral care is entrusted to several priests jointly, that there be a
moderator as mentioned in can. 517 §1.
[The office of
parish priest may not be entrusted to a group consisting of clerics and lay
people: hence terms such as “team leader”, etc., which convey a sense of
collegiate government of the parish, are to be avoided: see Congregation for the Clergy, Instruction The
pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising
mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, no. 66]
§2 The entrustment of a parish, as in §1, may be
either in perpetuity or for a specified time. In either case this is to be done
by means of a written agreement made between the diocesan Bishop and the
competent Superior of the institute or society. This agreement must expressly
and accurately define, among other things, the work to be done, the persons to
be assigned to it and the financial arrangements.
Can. 521 §1 To be validly appointed a
parish priest, one must be in the sacred order of priesthood.
§2 He is also to be outstanding in sound doctrine and
uprightness of character, endowed with zeal for souls and other virtues, and
possessed of those qualities which by universal or particular law are required
for the care of the parish in question.
§3 In order that one be appointed to the office of
parish priest, his suitability must be clearly established, in a manner
determined by the diocesan Bishop, even by examination.
Can. 522 It is necessary that a
parish priest have the benefit of stability, and therefore he is to be
appointed for an indeterminate period of time. The diocesan Bishop may appoint
him for a specified period of time only if the Episcopal Conference has by
decree allowed this.
[The Congregation for the Clergy’s Instruction The
pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising
mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, no. 68, suggests a minimum of five
years for a fixed-term appointment]
Can. 523 Without prejudice to can.
682, appointment to the office of parish priest belongs to the diocesan Bishop,
who is free to confer it on whomsoever he wishes, unless someone else has a
right of presentation or election.
Can. 524 The diocesan Bishop is to
confer a vacant parish on the one whom, after consideration of all the
circumstances, he judges suitable for the parochial care of that parish,
without any preference of persons. In order to assess suitability, he is to
consult the vicar forane, conduct suitable enquiries and, if it is appropriate,
seek the view of some priests and lay members of Christ’s faithful.
Can. 525 When a see is vacant or
impeded, it is for the diocesan Administrator or whoever governs the diocese in
the interim:
1° to institute priests lawfully presented for a
parish or to confirm those lawfully elected to one;
2° to appoint parish priests if the see has been
vacant or impeded for a year.
Can. 526 §1 A parish priest is to have
the parochial care of one parish only. However, because of a shortage of
priests or other circumstances, the care of a number of neighbouring parishes
can be entrusted to the one parish priest.
[An Explanatory
Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 13.XI.1997, suggests
that a single priest could canonically be pastor in
each and every parish entrusted to him. The “incompatibility of offices” in
can. 152 refers to incompatibility of fact rather than of law]
§2 In any one parish there is to be only one parish
priest, or one moderator in accordance with can. 517 §1; any contrary custom is
reprobated and any contrary privilege revoked.
Can. 527 §1 One who is promoted to
exercise the pastoral care of a parish obtains this care and is bound to
exercise it from the moment he takes possession.
§2 The local Ordinary or a priest delegated by him
puts the parish priest into possession, in accordance with the procedure
approved by particular law or by lawful custom. For a just reason, however, the
same Ordinary can dispense from this procedure, in which case the communication
of the dispensation to the parish replaces the taking of possession.
§3 The local Ordinary is to determine the time within
which the parish priest must take possession of the parish. If, in the absence
of a lawful impediment, he has not taken possession within this time, the local
Ordinary can declare the parish vacant.
Can. 528 §1 The parish priest has the
obligation of ensuring that the word of God is proclaimed in its entirety to
those living in the parish. He is therefore to see to it that the lay members
of Christ’s faithful are instructed in the truths of faith, especially by means
of the homily on Sundays and holydays of obligation and by catechetical
formation. He is to foster works which promote the spirit of the Gospel,
including its relevance to social justice. He is to have a special care for the
Catholic education of children and young people. With the collaboration of the
faithful, he is to make every effort to bring the gospel message to those also
who have given up religious practice or who do not profess the true faith.
§2 The parish priest is to take care that the blessed Eucharist
is the centre of the parish assembly of the faithful. He is to strive to ensure
that the faithful are nourished by the devout celebration of the sacraments,
and in particular that they frequently approach the sacraments of the blessed Eucharist
and penance. He is to strive to lead them to prayer, including prayer in their
families, and to take a live and active part in the sacred liturgy. Under the
authority of the diocesan Bishop, the parish priest must direct this liturgy in
his own parish, and he is bound to be on guard against abuses.
Can. 529 §1 So that he may fulfil his
office of pastor diligently, the parish priest is to strive to know the
faithful entrusted to his care. He is therefore to visit their families,
sharing in their cares and anxieties and, in a
special way, their sorrows, comforting them in the Lord. If in certain matters
they are found wanting, he is prudently to correct them. He is to help the sick
and especially the dying in great charity, solicitiously
restoring them with the sacraments and commending their souls to God. He is to
be especially diligent in seeking out the poor, the suffering, the lonely,
those who are exiled from their homeland, and those burdened with special
difficulties. He is to strive also to ensure that spouses and parents are
sustained in the fulfilment of their proper duties, and to foster the growth of
Christian life in the family.
§2 The parish priest is to recognise and promote the
specific role which the lay members of Christ’s faithful have in the mission of
the Church, fostering their associations which have religious purposes. He is
to cooperate with his proper Bishop and with the presbyterium of the diocese. Moreover, he is to endeavour to ensure
that the faithful are concerned for the community of the parish, that they feel
themselves to be members both of the diocese and of the universal Church, and
that they take part in and sustain works which promote this community.
Can. 530 The functions especially
entrusted to the parish priest are as follows:
1° the administration of baptism;
2° the administration of the sacrament of confirmation
to those in danger of death, in accordance with can. 883, n. 3;
3° the administration of Viaticum and of the anointing
of the sick, without prejudice to can. 1003 §§2 and 3, and the imparting of the
apostolic blessing;
4° the assistance at marriages and the nuptial
blessing;
5° the conducting of funerals;
6° the blessing of the baptismal font at paschal time,
the conduct of processions outside the church, and the giving of solemn
blessings outside the church;
7° the more solemn celebration of the Eucharist on
Sundays and holydays of obligation.
Can. 531 Even though another person
has performed some parochial function, he is to give the offering he receives
from the faithful on that occasion to the parish fund unless, in respect of
voluntary offerings, there is a clear contrary intention on the donor’s part;
it is for the diocesan Bishop, after consulting the council of priests, to
prescribe regulations concerning the destination of these offerings and to
provide for the remuneration of clerics who fulfil such a parochial function.
Can. 532 In all juridical matters,
the parish priest acts in the person of the parish, in accordance with the law.
He is to ensure that the parish goods are administered in accordance with cann. 1281‑1288.
Can. 533 §1 The parish priest is obliged to reside in the parochial house,
near the church. In particular cases, however, where there is a just reason,
the local Ordinary may permit him to reside elsewhere, especially in a house
common to several priests, provided the carrying out of the parochial duties is
properly and suitably catered for.
§2 Unless there is a grave reason to the contrary, the
parish priest may each year be absent on holiday from his parish for a period
not exceeding one month, continuous or otherwise. The days which the parish
priest spends on the annual spiritual retreat are not reckoned in this period
of vacation. For an absence from the parish of more than a week, however, the
parish priest is bound to advise the local Ordinary.
§3 It is for the diocesan Bishop to establish norms by
which, during the parish priest’s absence, the care of the parish is provided
for by a priest with the requisite faculties.
Can. 534 §1 When he has taken
possession of his parish, the parish priest is bound on each Sunday and holyday
of obligation in his diocese to apply the Mass for the people entrusted to him.
If he is lawfully impeded from this celebration, he is to have someone else
apply the Mass on these days or apply it himself on other days.
§2 A parish priest who has the care of several
parishes is bound to apply only one Mass on the days mentioned in §1, for all
the people entrusted to him.
[The same would seem to apply even if the priest is canonically pastor
of more than one parish: see Explanatory
Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 13.XI.1997]
§3 A parish priest who has not discharged the
obligations mentioned in §§1 and 2, is as soon as possible to apply for the
people as many Masses as he has omitted.
Can. 535 §1 In each parish there are to
be parochial registers, that is, of baptisms, of marriages and of deaths, and
any other registers prescribed by the Episcopal Conference or by the diocesan
Bishop. The parish priest is to ensure that entries are accurately made and
that the registers are carefully preserved.
§2 In the baptismal register, a note is also to be made of ascription to a Church ‘sui iuris’ or the transfer to another Church, as well as of confirmation and of all matters pertaining to the canonical status of the faithful by reason of marriage, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1133, adoption, the reception of sacred orders, the making of perpetual profession in a religious institute. These annotations are always to be stated on a Certificate of Baptism.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
§3 Each parish is to have its own seal. Certificates
concerning the canonical status of the faithful, and all acts which can have
juridical significance, are to be signed by the parish priest or his delegate
and secured with the parochial seal.
§4 In each parish there is to be an archive, in which
the parochial books are to be kept, together with episcopal letters and other
documents which it may be necessary or useful to preserve. On the occasion of
visitation or at some other opportune time, the diocesan Bishop or his delegate
is to inspect all of these matters. The parish priest is to take care that they
do not fall into unauthorised hands.
§5 Older parochial registers are also to be carefully
safeguarded, in accordance with the provisions of particular law.
Can. 536 §1 If, after consulting the
council of priests, the diocesan Bishop considers it opportune, a pastoral
council is to be established in each parish. In this council, which is presided
over by the parish priest, Christ’s faithful, together with those who by virtue
of their office are engaged in pastoral care in the parish, give their help in
fostering pastoral action.
§2 The pastoral council has only a consultative vote,
and it is regulated by the norms laid down by the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 537 In each parish there is to
be a finance committee to help the parish priest in the administration of the
goods of the parish, without prejudice to can. 532. It is ruled by the
universal law and by the norms laid down by the diocesan Bishop, and it is comprised
of members of the faithful selected according to these norms.
[The same
person may be on the finance committee of multiple parishes: see Congregation for the Clergy, Instruction The
pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising
mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, no. 104]
Can. 538 §1 A parish priest ceases to
hold office by removal or transfer effected by the diocesan Bishop in
accordance with the law; by his personal resignation, for a just reason, which
for validity requires that it be accepted by the diocesan Bishop; and by the lapse
of time if, in accordance with the particular law mentioned in can. 522, he was
appointed for a specified period of time.
§2 A parish priest who is a member of a religious
institute or is incardinated in a society of apostolic life, is removed in
accordance with can. 682 §2.
§3 A parish priest who has completed his seventy fifth
year of age is requested to offer his resignation from office to the diocesan
Bishop who, after considering all the circumstances of person and place, is to
decide whether to accept or defer it. Having taken account of the norms laid
down by the Episcopal Conference, the diocesan Bishop must make provision for
the appropriate maintenance and residence of the priest who has resigned.
[See Congregation for the Clergy, Instruction The
pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising
mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, no. 72]
Can. 539 When a parish is
vacant, or when the parish priest is prevented from exercising his pastoral
office in the parish by reason of imprisonment, exile or banishment, or by
reason of incapacity or ill health or some other cause, the diocesan Bishop is
as soon as possible to appoint a parochial administrator, that is, a priest who
will take the place of the parish priest in accordance with can. 540.
[It is
illegitimate for a bishop to appoint a parish administrator for an extended
period of time simply to avoid the appointment of a parish priest: see Congregation for the Clergy, Instruction The
pastoral conversion of the Parish community in the service of the evangelising
mission of the Church, 20.VII.2020, no. 75]
Can. 540 §1 The parochial administrator
is bound by the same obligations and has the same rights as a parish priest,
unless the diocesan Bishop prescribes otherwise.
§2 The parochial administrator may not do anything
which could prejudice the rights of the parish priest or could do harm to
parochial property.
§3 When he has discharged his office, the parochial
administrator is to give an account to the parish priest.
Can. 541 §1 When a parish is vacant, or
when the parish priest is impeded from exercising his pastoral office, pending
the appointment of a parochial administrator the interim governance of the
parish is to be undertaken by the assistant priest; if there are a number of
assistants, by the senior by appointment; if there are none, by the parish
priest determined by particular law.
§2 The one who has undertaken the governance of the
parish in accordance with §1, is at once to inform the local Ordinary of the
parish vacancy.
Can. 542 The priests to whom, in
accordance with can. 517 §1, is jointly entrusted the pastoral care of a parish
or of a number of parishes together:
1° must possess the qualities mentioned in can. 521;
2° are to be appointed in accordance with cann. 522 and 524;
3° obtain the pastoral care only from the moment of
taking possession: their moderator is put into possession in accordance with
can. 527 §2; for the other priests, the profession of faith lawfully made
replaces the taking of possession.
Can. 543 §1 Each of the priests to whom
the care of a parish or of a number of parishes together is jointly entrusted,
is bound to fulfil the duties and functions of a parish priest mentioned in cann. 528, 529 and 530. They are to do this according to a
plan determined among themselves. The faculty to assist at marriages, and all
the faculties to dispense which are given to a parish priest by virtue of the
law itself, belong to all, but are to be exercised under the direction of the
moderator.
§2 All the priests who belong to the group:
1° are bound by the obligation of residence;
2° are by common counsel to establish an arrangement
by which one of them celebrates the Mass for the people, in accordance with
can. 534.
3° in juridical affairs, only the moderator acts in
the person of the parish or parishes entrusted to the group.
Can. 544 When one of the priests, or
the moderator, of the group mentioned in can. 517 §1 ceases to hold office, or
when any member of it becomes incapable of exercising his pastoral office, the
parish or parishes whose care is entrusted to the group do not become vacant.
It is for the diocesan Bishop to appoint another moderator; until he is
appointed by the Bishop, the priest of the group who is senior by appointment
is to fulfil this office.
Can. 545 §1 Whenever it is necessary or
opportune for the due pastoral care of the parish, one or more assistant
priests can be joined with the parish priest. As cooperators with the parish
priest and sharers in his concern, they are, by common counsel and effort with
the parish priest and under his authority, to labour in the pastoral ministry.
§2 An assistant priest may be appointed either to help
in exercising the entire pastoral ministry, whether in the whole parish or in a
part of it or for a particular group of the faithful within it, or even to help
in carrying out a specific ministry in a number of parishes at the same time.
Can. 546 To be validly appointed an
assistant priest, one must be in the sacred order of priesthood.
Can. 547 The diocesan Bishop freely
appoints an assistant priest; if he has judged it opportune, he will have
consulted the parish priest or parish priests of the parishes to which the
assistant is appointed, and the Vicar forane, without prejudice to can. 682 §1.
Can. 548 §1 The obligations and rights
of assistant priests are defined not only by the canons of this chapter, but
also by the diocesan statutes, and by the letter of the diocesan Bishop; they
are more specifically determined by the directions of the parish priest.
§2 Unless it is otherwise expressly provided in the
letter of the diocesan Bishop, the assistant priest is by virtue of his office
bound to help the parish priest in the entire parochial ministry, with the
exception of the application of the Mass for the people. Likewise, if the
matter should arise in accordance with the law, he is bound to take the place
of the parish priest.
§3 The assistant priest is to report regularly to the
parish priest on pastoral initiatives, both those planned and those already
undertaken. In this way the parish priest and the assistant or assistants can
by their joint efforts provide a pastoral care of the parish for which they are
together answerable.
Can. 549 When the parish priest is
absent, the norms of can. 541 §1 are to be observed, unless the diocesan Bishop
has provided otherwise in accordance with can. 533 §3, or unless a parochial
administrator has been appointed. If can. 541 §1 is applied, the assistant
priest is bound by all the obligations of the parish priest, with the exception
of the obligation to apply the Mass for the people.
Can. 550 §1 The assistant priest is
bound to reside in the parish or, if he is appointed for a number of parishes
at the same time, in one of them. For a just reason, however, the local
Ordinary may permit him to reside elsewhere, especially in a house common to several
priests, provided the carrying out of the pastoral duties does not in any way
suffer thereby.
§2 The local Ordinary is to see to it that, where it
is possible, some manner of common life in the parochial house be encouraged
between the parish priest and the assistants.
§3 As far as holidays are concerned, the assistant
priest has the same rights as the parish priest.
Can. 551 The provisions of can. 531
are to be observed in respect of offerings which Christ’s faithful make to the
assistant priest on the occasion of his exercise of the pastoral ministry.
Can. 552 Without prejudice to can.
682 §2, an assistant priest may for a just reason be removed by the diocesan
Bishop or the diocesan Administrator.
Can. 553 §1 The Vicar forane, known
also as the dean or the archpriest or by some other title, is the priest who is
placed in charge of a vicariate forane.
§2 Unless it is otherwise prescribed by particular
law, the Vicar forane is appointed by the diocesan Bishop; if he has considered
it prudent to do so, he will have consulted the priests who are exercising the
ministry in the vicariate.
Can. 554 §1 For the office of Vicar
forane, which is not tied to the office of parish priest of any given parish,
the Bishop is to choose a priest whom, in view of the circumstances of place
and time, he has judged to be suitable.
§2 The Vicar forane is to be appointed for a certain
period of time, determined by particular law.
§3 For a just reason, the diocesan Bishop may in
accordance with his prudent judgement freely remove the Vicar forane from
office.
Can. 555 §1 Apart from the faculties
lawfully given to him by particular law, the Vicar forane has the duty and the
right:
1° to promote and coordinate common pastoral action in
the vicariate;
2° to see that the clerics of his district lead a life
befitting their state, and discharge their obligations carefully
3° to ensure that religious functions are celebrated
according to the provisions of the sacred liturgy; that the elegance and
neatness of the churches and sacred furnishings are properly maintained,
particularly in regard to the celebration of the Eucharist and the custody of
the blessed Sacrament; that the parish registers are correctly entered and duly
safeguarded; that ecclesiastical goods are carefully administered; finally,
that the parochial house is looked after with care.
§2 In the vicariate entrusted to him, the Vicar
forane:
1° is to encourage the clergy, in accordance with the
provisions of particular law, to attend at the prescribed time lectures and
theological meetings or conferences, in accordance with can. 279 §2.
2° is to see to it that spiritual assistance is
available to the priests of his district, and he is to show a particular
solicitude for those who are in difficult circumstances or are troubled by
problems.
§3 When he has come to know that parish priests of his
district are seriously ill, the Vicar forane is to ensure that they do not lack
spiritual and material help. When they die, he is to ensure that their funerals
are worthily celebrated. Moreover, should any of them fall ill or die, he is to
see to it that books, documents, sacred furnishings and other items belonging
to the Church are not lost or removed.
§4 The Vicar forane is obliged to visit the parishes
of his district in accordance with the arrangement made by the diocesan Bishop.
Article 1: Rectors of Churches
Can. 556 Rectors of churches are
here understood to be priests to whom is entrusted the care of some church
which is neither a parochial nor a capitular church, nor a church attached to
the house of a religious community or a society of apostolic life which holds
services in it.
Can. 557 §1 The rector of a church is
freely appointed by the diocesan Bishop, without prejudice to a right of
election or presentation to which someone may lawfully have claim: in which
case the diocesan Bishop has the right to confirm or to appoint the rector.
§2 Even if the church belongs to some clerical
religious institute of pontifical right, it is for the diocesan Bishop to
appoint the rector presented by the Superior.
§3 The rector of a church which is attached to a
seminary or to a college governed by clerics, is the rector of the seminary or
college, unless the diocesan Bishop has determined otherwise.
Can. 558 Without prejudice to can.
262, the rector of a church may not perform in his church the parochial functions
mentioned in can. 530 nn. 1‑6, without the
consent or, where the matter requires it, the delegation of the parish priest.
Can. 559 The rector can conduct
liturgical celebrations, even solemn ones, in the church entrusted to him,
without prejudice to the legitimate laws of a foundation, and on condition that
in the judgement of the local Ordinary these celebrations do not in any way
harm the parochial ministry.
Can. 560 Where he considers it
opportune, the local Ordinary may direct the rector to celebrate in his church
certain functions for the people, even parochial functions, and also to open
the church to certain groups of the faithful so that they may hold liturgical
celebrations there.
Can. 561 Without the permission of
the rector or some other lawful superior, no one may celebrate the Eucharist,
administer the sacraments, or perform other sacred functions in the church.
This permission is to be given or refused in accordance with the law.
Can. 562 Under the authority of the
local Ordinary, having observed the lawful statutes and respected acquired
rights, the rector of a church is obliged to see that sacred functions are
worthily celebrated in the church, in accordance with liturgical and canon law,
that obligations are faithfully fulfilled, that the property is carefully
administered, and that the maintenance and adornment of the furnishings and
buildings are assured. He must also ensure that nothing is done which is in any
way unbecoming to the holiness of the place and to the reverence due to the
house of God.
Can. 563 For a just reason, the
local Ordinary may in accordance with his prudent judgement remove the rector
of a church from office, even if he had been elected or presented by others,
but without prejudice to can. 682 §2.
Can. 564 A chaplain is a priest to
whom is entrusted in a stable manner the pastoral care, at least in part, of
some community or special group of Christ’s faithful, to be exercised in
accordance with universal and particular law.
Can. 565 Unless the law provides
otherwise or unless special rights lawfully belong to someone, a chaplain is
appointed by the local Ordinary, to whom also it belongs to appoint one who has
been presented or to confirm one elected.
Can. 566 §1 A chaplain must be given
all the faculties which due pastoral care demands. Besides those which are
given by particular law or by special delegation, a chaplain has by virtue of
his office the faculty to hear the confessions of the faithful entrusted to his
care, to preach to them the word of God, to administer Viaticum and the
anointing of the sick, and to confer the sacrament of confirmation when they
are in danger of death.
§2 In hospitals and prisons and on sea voyages, a
chaplain has the further facility, to be exercised only in those places, to
absolve from latae sententiae censures which are neither
reserved nor declared, without prejudice to can. 976.
Can. 567 §1 The local Ordinary is not
to proceed to the appointment of a chaplain to a house of a lay religious
institute without consulting the Superior. The Superior has the right, after
consulting the community, to propose a particular priest.
§2 It is the responsibility of the chaplain to
celebrate or to direct liturgical functions; he may not, however, involve
himself in the internal governance of the institute.
Can. 568 As far as possible,
chaplains are to be appointed for those who, because of their condition of
life, are not able to avail themselves of the ordinary care of parish priests,
as for example, migrants, exiles, fugitives, nomads and sea‑farers.
Can. 569 Chaplains to the armed
forces are governed by special laws.
Can. 570 If a non‑parochial
church is attached to a centre of a community or group, the rector of the
church is to be the chaplain, unless the care of the community or of the church
requires otherwise.
Can. 571 In the exercise of his
pastoral office a chaplain is to maintain the due relationship with the parish
priest.
Can. 572 In regard to the removal of
a chaplain, the provisions of can. 563 are to be observed.
Can. 573 §1 Life consecrated through
profession of the evangelical counsels is a stable form of living, in which the
faithful follow Christ more closely under the action of the Holy Spirit, and
are totally dedicated to God, who is supremely loved. By a new and special
title they are dedicated to seek the perfection of charity in the service of
God’s Kingdom, for the honour of God, the building up of the Church and the
salvation of the world. They are a splendid sign in the Church, as they
foretell the heavenly glory.
§2 Christ’s faithful freely assume this manner of life
in institutes of consecrated life which are canonically established by the
competent ecclesiastical authority. By vows or by other sacred bonds, in
accordance with the laws of their own institutes, they profess the evangelical
counsels of chastity, poverty and obedience. Because of the charity to which
these counsels lead, they are linked in a special way to the Church and its
mystery.
Can. 574 §1 The state of persons who
profess the evangelical counsels in these institutes belongs to the life and
holiness of the Church. It is therefore to be fostered and promoted by everyone
in the Church.
§2 Some of Christ’s faithful are specially called by
God to this state, so that they may benefit from a special gift in the life of
the Church and contribute to its saving mission according to the purpose and
spirit of each institute.
Can. 575 The evangelical counsels,
based on the teaching and example of Christ the Master, are a divine gift which
the Church received from the Lord and which by His grace it preserves always.
Can. 576 It is the prerogative of
the competent authority in the Church to interpret the evangelical counsels, to
legislate for their practice and, by canonical approval, to constitute the
stable forms of living which arise from them. The same authority has the responsibility
to do what is in its power to ensure that institutes grow and flourish
according to the spirit of their founders and to their sound traditions.
Can. 577 In the Church there are
many institutes of consecrated life, with gifts that differ according to the
graces given them: they more closely follow Christ praying, or Christ
proclaiming the Kingdom of God, or Christ doing good to people, or Christ in
dialogue with the people of this world, but always Christ doing the will of the
Father.
Can. 578 The whole patrimony of an
institute must be faithfully preserved by all. This patrimony is comprised of
the intentions of the founders, of all that the competent ecclesiastical
authority has approved concerning the nature, purpose, spirit and character of
the institute, and of its sound traditions.
Can. 579 Diocesan Bishops can, by formal decree, validly establish institutes of consecrated life in their own territories, if the prior permission of the Apostolic See has been given in writing.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Authenticum charismatis, 1.XI.2020]
[See Rescript
“ex audientia Ss.mi” of
15.VI.2022 requiring the diocesan bishop, before erecting by decree a
public association of the faithful with a view to its becoming an institute of
consecrated life or a society of apostolic life, to obtain the written
permission of the Dicastery of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic
Life]
Can. 580 The aggregation of one
institute of consecrated life to another is reserved to the competent authority
of the aggregating institute, always safeguarding the canonical autonomy of the
other institute.
Can. 581 It is for the competent
authority of the institute to divide the institute into parts, by whatever name
these may be called, to establish new parts, or to unite or otherwise modify
those in existence, in accordance with the constitutions.
Can. 582 Fusions and unions of
institutes of consecrated life are reserved to the Apostolic See alone. To it
are likewise reserved confederations or federations.
Can. 583 Changes in institutes of
consecrated life which affect elements previously approved by the Apostolic
See, cannot be made without the permission of the same See.
Can. 584 Only the Apostolic See can
suppress an institute and dispose of its temporal goods.
Can. 585 The competent authority of
an institute can suppress parts of the same institute.
Can. 586 §1 A true autonomy of life,
especially of governance, is recognised for each institute. This autonomy means
that each institute has its own discipline in the Church and can preserve whole
and entire the patrimony described in can. 578.
§2 Local Ordinaries have the responsibility of
preserving and safeguarding this autonomy.
Can. 587 §1 To protect more faithfully
the vocation and identity of each institute, the fundamental code or
constitutions of the institute are to contain, in addition to those elements
which are to be preserved in accordance with can. 578, basic norms about the
governance of the institute, the discipline of the members, the admission and
formation of members, and the proper object of their sacred bonds.
§2 This code is approved by the competent
ecclesiastical authority, and can be changed only with the consent of the same.
§3 In the constitutions, the spiritual and juridical
elements are to be aptly harmonised. Norms, however, are not to be multiplied
without necessity.
§4 Other norms which are established by the competent
authority of the institute are to be properly collected in other codes, but
these can be conveniently reviewed and adapted according to the needs of time
and place.
Can. 588 §1 In itself, the state of
consecrated life is neither clerical nor lay.
§2 A clerical institute is one which, by reason of the end or purpose intended by the founder, or by reason of lawful tradition, is under the governance of clerics, presupposes the exercise of sacred orders, and is recognised as such by ecclesiastical authority.
[See Rescript
“ex audientia Ss.mi” of
18.V.2022 allowing non-clerics to be major Superiors in institutes of
consecrated life and societies of apostolic life. However a non-cleric major
Superior is not an “Ordinary” within can. 134 §1]
§3 A lay institute is one which is recognised as such
by ecclesiastical authority because, by its nature, character and purpose, its
proper role, defined by its founder or by lawful tradition, does not include
the exercise of sacred orders.
Can. 589 An institute of consecrated
life is of pontifical right if it has been established by the Apostolic See, or
approved by it by means of a formal decree. An institute is of diocesan right
if it has been established by the diocesan Bishop and has not obtained a decree
of approval from the Apostolic See.
Can. 590 §1 Institutes of consecrated
life, since they are dedicated in a special way to the service of God and of
the whole Church, are in a particular manner subject to its supreme authority.
§2 The individual members are bound to obey the
Supreme Pontiff as their highest Superior, by reason also of their sacred bond
of obedience.
Can. 591 The better to ensure the
welfare of institutes and the needs of the apostolate, the Supreme Pontiff, by
virtue of his primacy in the universal Church, and with a view to the common
good, can withdraw institutes of consecrated life from the governance of local
Ordinaries and subject them to himself alone, or to some other ecclesiastical
authority.
Can. 592 §1 To promote closer union
between institutes and the Apostolic See, each supreme Moderator is to send a
brief account of the state and life of the institute to the same Apostolic See,
in the manner and at the time it lays down.
§2 Moderators of each institute are to promote a
knowledge of the documents issued by the Holy See which affect the members
entrusted to them, and are to ensure that these documents are observed.
Can. 593 In their internal
governance and discipline, institutes of pontifical right are subject directly
and exclusively to the authority of the Apostolic See, without prejudice to
can. 586.
Can. 594 An institute of diocesan
right remains under the special care of the diocesan Bishop, without prejudice
to can. 586.
Can. 595 §1 It is the Bishop of the
principal house who approves the constitutions, and confirms any changes
lawfully introduced into them, except for those matters which the Apostolic See
has taken in hand. He also deals with major affairs which exceed the power of
the internal authority of the institute. If the institute had spread to other
dioceses, he is in all these matters to consult with the other diocesan Bishops
concerned.
§2 The diocesan Bishop can grant a dispensation from
the constitutions in particular cases.
Can. 596 §1 Superiors and Chapters of
institutes have that authority over the members which is defined in the
universal law and in the constitutions.
§2 In clerical religious institutes of pontifical
right, Superiors have in addition the ecclesiastical power of governance, for
both the external and the internal forum.
§3 The provisions of cann.
131, 133 and 137‑144 apply to the authority mentioned in §1.
Can. 597 §1 Every Catholic with a right
intention and the qualities required by universal law and the institute’s own
law, and who is without impediment, may be admitted to an institute of
consecrated life.
§2 No one may be admitted without suitable
preparation.
Can. 598 §1 Each institute, taking
account of its own special character and purposes, is to define in its
constitutions the manner in which the evangelical counsels of chastity, poverty
and obedience are to be observed in its way of life.
§2 All members must not only observe the evangelical
counsels faithfully and fully, but also direct their lives according to the
institute’s own law, and so strive for the perfection of their state.
Can. 599 The evangelical counsel of
chastity embraced for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven, is a sign of the world
to come, and a source of greater fruitfulness in an undivided heart. It
involves the obligation of perfect continence observed in celibacy.
Can. 600 The evangelical counsel of
poverty in imitation of Christ who for our sake was made poor when he was rich,
entails a life which is poor in reality and in spirit, sober and industrious,
and a stranger to earthly riches. It also involves dependence and limitation in
the use and the disposition of goods, in accordance with each institute’s own
law.
Can. 601 The evangelical counsel of
obedience, undertaken in the spirit of faith and love in the following of
Christ, who was obedient even unto death, obliges submission of one’s will to
lawful Superiors, who act in the place of God when they give commands that are
in accordance with each institute’s own constitutions.
Can. 602 The fraternal life proper
to each institute unites all the members into, as it were, a special family in
Christ. It is to be so defined that for all it proves of mutual assistance to
fulfil their vocation. The fraternal union of the members, rooted and based in
charity, is to be an example of universal reconciliation in Christ.
Can. 603 §1 Besides institutes of
consecrated life, the Church recognises the life of hermits or anchorites, in
which Christ’s faithful withdraw further from the world and devote their lives
to the praise of God and the salvation of the world through the silence of
solitude and through constant prayer and penance.
§2 Hermits are recognised by law as dedicated to God
in consecrated life if, in the hands of the diocesan Bishop, they publicly
profess, by a vow or some other sacred bond, the three evangelical counsels,
and then lead their particular form of life under the guidance of the diocesan
Bishop.
Can. 604 §1 The order of virgins is
also to be added to these forms of consecrated life. Through their pledge to
follow Christ more closely, virgins are consecrated to God, mystically espoused
to Christ and dedicated to the service of the Church, when the diocesan Bishop
consecrates them according to the approved liturgical rite.
§2 Virgins can be associated together to fulfil their
pledge more faithfully, and to assist each other to serve the Church in a way
that befits their state.
§3 The diocesan bishop is competent for the recognition and erection of such associations at the diocesan level, within his territory; the conference of bishops is competent at the national level, within its own territory.
[New paragraph added by m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
[The minimum age for beginning the propaedeutic period is normally 18;
for consecration it is 25: see Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life
and Societies of Apostolic Life, Instruction Ecclesiae
sponsae imago, 8.VI.2016, no. 82]
Can. 605 The approval of new forms
of consecrated life is reserved to the Apostolic See. Diocesan Bishops,
however, are to endeavour to discern new gifts of consecrated life which the
Holy Spirit entrusts to the Church. They are also to assist promotors to express
their purposes in the best possible way, and to protect these purposes with
suitable statutes, especially by the application of the general norms contained
in this part of the Code.
[Pope John Paul II’s post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation Vita consecrata, 25.III.1996, no. 62, establishes some criteria for interpreting can. 605]
Can. 606 Provisions concerning
institutes of consecrated life and their members are equally valid in law for
both sexes, unless it is otherwise clear from the context or from the nature of
things.
Can. 607 §1 Religious life, as a
consecration of the whole person, manifests in the Church the marvellous
marriage established by God as a sign of the world to come. Religious thus
consummate a full gift of themselves as a sacrifice offered to God, so that
their whole existence becomes a continuous worship of God in charity.
§2 A religious institute is a society in which, in
accordance with their own law, the members pronounce public vows and live a
fraternal life in common. The vows are either perpetual or temporary; if the
latter, they are to be renewed when the time elapses.
§3 The public witness which religious are to give to
Christ and the Church involves that separation from the world which is proper
to the character and purpose of each institute.
Can. 608 A religious community is to
live in a lawfully constituted house, under the authority of a Superior
designated according to the norms of law. Each house is to have at least an
oratory, in which the Eucharist is celebrated and reserved, so that it may
truly be the centre of the community.
Can. 609 §1 A house of a religious
institute is established, with the prior written consent of the diocesan
Bishop, by the authority competent according to the constitutions.
§2 For the establishment of a monastery of cloistered
nuns, the permission of the Apostolic See is also required.
Can. 610 §1 In establishing religious
houses, the welfare of the Church and of the institute are to be kept in mind,
and care must be taken to safeguard everything that is necessary for the
members to lead their religious life in accordance with the purposes and spirit
proper to the institute.
§2 No house is to be established unless it is
prudently foreseen that the needs of the members can be suitably provided for.
Can. 611 The consent of the diocesan
Bishop for the establishment of a religious house carries with it the right:
1° to lead a life according to the character and
purposes proper to the institute;
2° to engage in the works which are proper to the
institute, in accordance with the law, and subject to any conditions attached
to the consent;
3° for clerical religious institutes to have a church,
subject to the provisions of can. 1215 §3, and to conduct the sacred
ministries, with due observance of the law.
Can. 612 The consent of the diocesan
Bishop is required if a religious house is to be used for apostolic works other
than those for which it was established. This permission is not required for a
change which, while observing the laws of the foundation, concerns only
internal governance and discipline.
Can. 613 §1 A religious house of canons
regular or of monks under the governance and care of their own Moderator is
autonomous, unless the constitutions decree otherwise.
§2 The Moderator of an autonomous house is by law a
major Superior.
Can. 614 Monasteries of cloistered
nuns which are associated with an institute of men, have their own rule of life
and governance, in accordance with the constitutions. The mutual rights and
obligations are to be defined in such a way that spiritual good may come from
the association.
Can. 615 If an autonomous monastery
has no major Superior other than its own Moderator, and is not associated with
any institute of religious in such a way that the Superior of that institute
has over the monastery a real authority determined by the constitutions, it is
entrusted, in accordance with the norms of law, to the special vigilance of the
diocesan Bishop.
Can. 616 §1 After consultation with the
diocesan Bishop, a supreme Moderator can suppress a lawfully established
religious house, in accordance with the constitutions. The institute’s own law
is to make provision for the disposal of the goods of the suppressed house,
with due regard for the wishes of founders or benefactors and for lawfully
acquired rights.
§2 The Holy See alone can suppress the sole house of
an institute, in which case it is also reserved to the Holy See to prescribe
concerning the property of the house.
§3 Unless the constitutions enact otherwise, the
suppression of the autonomous houses mentioned in can. 613 belongs to the
general chapter.
§4 The suppression of an autonomous monastery of
cloistered nuns pertains to the Apostolic See; the provisions of the
constitutions are to be observed concerning the property of the monastery.
Article 1: Superiors and Councils
Can. 617 Superiors are to fulfil
their office and exercise their authority in accordance with the norms of the
universal law and of their own law.
Can. 618 The authority which
Superiors receive from God through the ministry of the Church is to be
exercised by them in a spirit of service. In fulfilling their office they are
to be docile to the will of God, and are to govern those subject to them as
children of God. By their reverence for the human person, they are to promote
voluntary obedience. They are to listen willingly to their subjects and foster
their cooperation for the good of the institute and the Church, without
prejudice however to their authority to decide and to command what is to be
done.
Can. 619 Superiors are to devote
themselves to their office with diligence. Together with the members entrusted
to them, they are to strive to build in Christ a fraternal community, in which
God is sought and loved above all. They are therefore frequently to nourish
their members with the food of God’s word and lead them to the celebration of
the liturgy. They are to be an example to the members in cultivating virtue and
in observing the laws and traditions proper to the institute. They are to give
the members opportune assistance in their personal needs. They are to be
solicitous in caring for and visiting the sick; they are to chide the restless,
console the fainthearted and be patient with all.
Can. 620 Major Superiors are those
who govern an entire institute, or a province or a part equivalent to a
province, or an autonomous house; the vicars of the above are also major
Superiors. To these are added the Abbot Primate and the Superior of a monastic
congregation, though these do not have all the authority which the universal
law gives to major Superiors.
Can. 621 A province is a union of
several houses which, under one superior, constitutes an immediate part of the
same institute, and is canonically established by lawful authority.
Can. 622 The supreme Moderator has
authority over all provinces, houses and members of the institute, to be
exercised in accordance with the institute’s own law. Other Superiors have
authority within the limits of their office.
Can. 623 To be validly appointed or
elected to the office of Superior, members must have been perpetually or
definitively professed for an appropriate period of time, to be determined by
their own law or, for major Superiors, by the constitutions.
Can. 624 §1 Superiors are to be
constituted for a certain and appropriate period of time, according to the
nature and needs of the institute unless the constitutions establish otherwise
for the supreme Moderator and for Superiors of an autonomous house.
§2 An institute’s own law is to make suitable
provisions so that Superiors constituted for a defined time do not continue in
offices of governance for too long a period of time without an interval.
§3 During their period in office, however, Superiors
may be removed or transferred to another office, for reasons prescribed in the
institute’s own law.
Can. 625 The supreme Moderator of
the institute is to be designated by canonical election, in accordance with the
constitutions.
§2 The Bishop of the principal house of the institute
presides at the election of the Superior of the autonomous monastery mentioned
in can. 615, and at the election of the supreme Moderator of an institute of
diocesan right.
§3 Other Superiors are to be constituted in accordance
with the constitutions, but in such a way that if they are elected, they
require the confirmation of the competent major Superior; if they are appointed
by the Superior, the appointment is to be preceded by suitable consultation.
Can. 626 Superiors in conferring
offices, and members in electing to office, are to observe the norms of the
universal law and the institute’s own law, avoiding any abuse or preference of
persons. They are to have nothing but God and the good of the institute before
their eyes, and appoint or elect those whom, in the Lord, they know to be
worthy and fitting. In elections, besides, they are to avoid directly or
indirectly lobbying for votes, either for themselves or for others.
Can. 627 §1 Superiors are to have their
own council, in accordance with the constitutions, and they must make use of it
in the exercise of their office.
§2 Apart from the cases prescribed in the universal
law, an institute’s own law is to determine the cases in which the validity of
an act depends upon consent or advice being sought in accordance with can. 127.
[The superior does not have the right to vote with his or her council,
even to break a tie: see Authentic
Interpretation of canon 127 §1, 5.VII.1985]
Can. 628 §1 Superiors who are
designated for this office by the institute’s own law are at stated times to
visit the houses and the members entrusted to them, in accordance with the
norms of the same law.
§2 The diocesan Bishop has the right and the duty to
visit the following, even in respect of religious discipline:
1° the autonomous monasteries mentioned in can. 615;
[See Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated life and Societies of Apostolic Life, Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018, no. 111: “In exemption of can. 628 §2, 1° CIC, the Federation President, within the established time, accompanies the Regular Visitator in the canonical visit to the federated monasteries as a Co-Visitator.” (Exemption approved by the Holy Father in forma specifica.)]
2° the individual houses of an institute of diocesan
right situated in his territory.
§3 The members are to act with confidence towards the
visitator, to whom when lawfully questioning they are bound to reply truthfully
and with charity. It is not lawful for anyone in any way to divert the members
from this obligation or otherwise to hinder the scope of the visitation.
Can. 629 Superiors are to reside
each in his or her own house, and they are not to leave it except in accordance
with the institute’s own law.
Can. 630 §1 While safeguarding the
discipline of the institute, Superiors are to acknowledge the freedom due to
the members concerning the sacrament of penance and the direction of
conscience.
§2 Superiors are to take care, in accordance with the
institute’s own law, that the members have suitable confessors available, to
whom they may confess frequently.
§3 In monasteries of cloistered nuns, in houses of
formation, and in large lay communities, there are to be ordinary confessors,
approved by the local Ordinary after consultation with the community. There is
however, no obligation to approach these confessors.
§4 Superiors are not to hear the confessions of their
subjects unless the members spontaneously request them to do so.
§5 The members are
to approach their superiors with trust and be able to open their minds freely
and spontaneously to them. Superiors, however, are forbidden in any way to
induce the members to make a manifestation of conscience to themselves.
[See Pope Francis, Letter to the People of God, 20.VIII.2018, on combating the culture of abuse]
Can. 631 §1 In an institute the general
chapter has supreme authority in accordance with the constitutions. It is to be
composed in such a way that it represents the whole institute and becomes a
true sign of its unity in charity. Its principal functions are to protect the
patrimony of the institute mentioned in can. 578 and to foster appropriate
renewal in accord with that patrimony. It also elects the supreme Moderator,
deals with matters of greater importance, and issues norms which all are bound
to obey.
§2 The composition of the general chapter and the
limits of its powers are to be defined in the constitutions. The institute’s
own law is to determine in further detail the order to be observed in the
celebration of the chapter, especially regarding elections and the matters to
be treated.
§3 According to the norms determined in the
institute’s own law, not only provinces and local communities, but also any
individual member may freely submit their wishes and suggestions to the general
chapter.
Can. 632 The institute’s own law is
to determine in greater detail matters concerning other chapters and other
similar assemblies of the institute, that is, concerning their nature,
authority, composition, procedure and time of celebration.
Can. 633 §1 Participatory and
consultative bodies are faithfully to carry out the task entrusted to them, in
accordance with the universal law and the institute’s own law. In their own way
they are to express the care and participation of all the members for the good
of the whole institute or community.
§2 In establishing and utilising these means of
participation and consultation, a wise discernment is to be observed, and the
way in which they operate is to be in conformity with the character and purpose
of the institute.
Article 3: Temporal Goods and their Administration
Can. 634 §1 Since they are by virtue of
the law juridical persons, institutes, provinces and houses have the capacity
to acquire, possess, administer and alienate temporal goods, unless this
capacity is excluded or limited in the constitutions.
§2 They are, however, to avoid all appearance of
luxury, excessive gain and the accumulation of goods.
Can. 635 §1 Since the temporal goods of
religious institutes are ecclesiastical goods, they are governed by the
provisions of Book V on ‘The Temporal Goods of the Church’, unless there is
express provision to the contrary.
§2 Each institute, however, is to establish suitable
norms for the use and administration of goods, so that the poverty proper to
the institute may be fostered, defended and expressed.
Can. 636 §1 In each institute, and in
each province ruled by a major Superior, there is to be a financial
administrator, distinct from the major Superior and constituted in accordance
with the institute’s own law. The financial administrator is to administer the
goods under the direction of the respective Superior. Even in local communities
a financial administrator, distinct from the local Superior, is in so far as
possible to be constituted.
§2 At the time and in the manner determined in the
institute’s own law the financial administrator and others with financial
responsibilities are to render an account of their administration to the
competent authority.
Can. 637 Once a year, the autonomous
monasteries mentioned in can. 615 are to render an account of their
administration to the local Ordinary. The local Ordinary also has the right to
be informed about the financial affairs of a religious house of diocesan right.
Can. 638 §1 It is for an institute’s
own law, within the limits of the universal law, to define the acts which
exceed the purpose and the manner of ordinary administration, and to establish
what is needed for the validity of an act of extraordinary administration.
§2 Besides Superiors, other officials designated for
this task in the institute’s own law may, within the limits of their office,
validly make payments and perform juridical acts of ordinary administration.
§3 For the validity of alienation, and of any
transaction by which the patrimonial condition of the juridical person could be
adversely affected there is required the written permission of the competent
Superior, given with the consent of his or her council. Moreover, the
permission of the Holy See is required if the transaction involves a sum
exceeding that which the Holy See has determined for each region, or if it
concerns things donated to the Church as a result of a vow, or objects which
are precious by reason of their artistic or historical value.
§4 For the autonomous monasteries mentioned in can. 615, and for institutes of diocesan right, the written consent of the diocesan Bishop is necessary.
[See Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated life and Societies of Apostolic Life, Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018:
52: “In
derogation from can. 638 §4 CIC, for the validity of the alienation and of any
other transaction by which the patrimonial situation of the monastery could be
damaged, the written permission of the Major Superior is required with the
consent of the Council or of the conventual Chapter, depending on the value of
the sale and the transaction, and the opinion of the Federal President”
(exemption approved by
the Holy Father in forma specifica);
81: “As regards the
female monasteries entrusted to the particular vigilance of the diocesan
Bishop, this is expressed in respect to the monastery community mainly in the
cases established by the universal law; as the diocesan Bishop, he: … d) in
derogation from can. 638 §4 CIC, gives as Local Ordinary, his written consent
for particular administrative acts, if established by its proper law”
(exemption
approved by the Holy Father in forma specifica);
108: “In derogation from can. 638 §4 CIC,
for the validity of the alienation of the assets of the suppressed monasteries,
the President of the Federation and the Federal Council, beyond the value of
the asset to be alienated, always and exclusively requires written permission
from the Holy See
(exemption approved by the Holy Father in
forma specifica)]
Can. 639 §1 If a juridical person has
contracted debts and obligations, even with the permission of the Superior, it
is responsible for them.
§2 If individual members have, with the permission of
the Superior, entered into contracts concerning their own property, they are
responsible. If, however, they have conducted business for the institute on the
mandate of a Superior, the institute is responsible.
§3 If a religious has entered into a contract without
any permission of Superiors, the religious is responsible, not the juridical
person.
§4 However, an action can always be brought against a
person who has gained from a contract entered into.
§5 Superiors are to be careful not to allow debts to
be contracted unless they are certain that normal income can service the
interest on the debt, and by lawful amortization repay the capital over a
period which is not unduly extended.
Can. 640 Taking into account the
circumstances of the individual places, institutes are to make a special effort
to give, as it were, a collective testimony of charity and poverty. They are to
do all in their power to donate something from their own resources to help the
needs of the Church and the support of the poor.
Article 1: Admission to the Novitiate
Can. 641 The right to admit
candidates to the novitiate belongs to the major Superiors, in accordance with
the norms of the institute’s own law.
Can. 642 Superiors are to exercise a
vigilant care to admit only those who, besides being of required age, are
healthy, have a suitable disposition, and have sufficient maturity to undertake
the life which is proper to the institute. If necessary, the health, disposition
and maturity are to be established by experts, without prejudice to can. 220.
Can. 643 §1 The following are invalidly
admitted to the novitiate:
1° One who has not yet completed the seventeenth year
of age;
2° a spouse, while the marriage lasts;
3° one who is currently bound by a sacred bond to some
institute of consecrated life, or is incorporated in some society of apostolic
life, without prejudice to can. 684;
4° one who enters the institute through force, fear or
deceit, or whom the Superior accepts under the same influences;
5° one who has concealed his or her incorporation in
an institute of consecrated life or society of apostolic life.
§2 An institute’s own law can constitute other
impediments even for the validity of admission, or attach other conditions.
Can. 644 Superiors are not to admit
secular clerics to the novitiate without consulting their proper Ordinary; nor
those who have debts which they are unable to meet.
Can. 645 §1 Before candidates are
admitted to the novitiate they must produce proof of baptism and confirmation,
and of their free status.
§2 The admission of clerics or others who had been
admitted to another institute of consecrated life, to a society of apostolic
life, or to a seminary, requires in addition the testimony of, respectively,
the local Ordinary, or the major Superior of the institute or society, or the
rector of the seminary.
§3 An institute’s own law can demand further proofs
concerning the suitability of candidates and their freedom from any impediment.
§4 The Superiors can seek other information, even
under secrecy, if this seems necessary to them.
Article 2: The Novitiate and the Formation of Novices
Can. 646 The purpose of the
novitiate, by which life in an institute begins, is to give the novices a
greater understanding of their divine vocation, and of their vocation to that
institute. During the novitiate the novices are to experience the manner of
life of the institute and form their minds and hearts in its spirit. At the
same time their resolution and suitability are to be tested.
Can. 647 §1 The establishment, transfer
and suppression of a novitiate house are to take place by a written decree of
the supreme Moderator of the institute, given with the consent of the council.
§2 To be valid, a novitiate must take place in a house
which is duly designated for this purpose. In particular cases and by way of
exception and with the permission of the supreme Moderator given with the
consent of the council, a candidate can make the novitiate in another house of
the institute, under the direction of an approved religious who takes the place
of the director of novices.
§3 A major Superior can allow a group of novices to
reside, for a certain period of time, in another specified house of the
institute.
Can. 648 §1 For validity, the novitiate
must comprise twelve months spent in the novitiate community, without prejudice
to the provision of can. 647 §3.
§2 To complete the formation of the novices, the
constitutions can prescribe, in addition to the time mentioned in §1, one or
more periods of apostolic activity, to be performed outside the novitiate
community.
§3 The novitiate is not to be extended beyond two
years.
Can. 649 §1 Without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 647 §3, and can. 648 §2, a novitiate is invalidated by an
absence from the novitiate house of more than three months, continuous or
broken. Any absence of more than fifteen days must be made good.
§2 With the permission of the competent major
Superior, first profession may be anticipated, though not by more than fifteen
days.
Can. 650 §1 The object of the novitiate
demands that novices be formed under the supervision of the director of
novices, in a manner of formation to be defined by the institute’s own law.
§2 The governance of the novices is reserved to the
director of novices alone, under the authority of the major Superiors.
Can. 651 §1 The director of novices is
to be a member of the institute who has taken perpetual vows and has been
lawfully designated.
§2 If need be, directors of novices may be given
assistants, who are subject to them in regard to the governance of the
novitiate and the manner of formation.
§3 Those in charge of the formation of novices are to
be members who have been carefully prepared, and who are not burdened with
other tasks, so that they may discharge their office fruitfully and in a stable
fashion.
Can. 652 §1 It is the responsibility of
the directors of novices and their assistants to discern and test the vocation
of the novices, and gradually to form them to lead the life of perfection which
is proper to the institute.
§2 Novices are to be led to develop human and Christian
virtues. Through prayer and self‑denial they are to be introduced to a
fuller way of perfection. They are to be instructed in contemplating the
mystery of salvation, and in reading and meditating on the sacred Scriptures.
Their preparation is to enable them to develop their worship of God in the
sacred liturgy. They are to learn how to lead a life consecrated to God and
their neighbour in Christ through the evangelical counsels. They are to learn
about the character and spirit of the institute, its purpose and discipline,
its history and life, and be imbued with a love for the Church and its sacred
Pastors.
§3 Novices, conscious of their own responsibility, are
to cooperate actively with the director of novices, so that they may faithfully
respond to the grace of their divine vocation.
§4 By the example of their lives and by prayer, the
members of the institute are to ensure that they do their part in assisting the
work of formation of the novices.
§5 The period of novitiate mentioned in can. 648 §1,
is to be set aside exclusively for the work of formation. The novices are
therefore not to be engaged in studies or duties which do not directly serve
this formation.
Can. 653 §1 A novice may freely leave
the institute. The competent authority of the institute may also dismiss a
novice.
§2 On the completion of the novitiate, a novice, if
judged suitable, is to be admitted to temporary profession; otherwise the
novice is to be dismissed. If a doubt exists concerning suitability, the time
of probation may be prolonged by the major Superior, in accordance with the
institute’s own law, but for a period not exceeding six months.
Article 3: Religious Profession
Can. 654 By religious profession
members make a public vow to observe the three evangelical counsels. Through
the ministry of the Church they are consecrated to God, and are incorporated
into the institute, with the rights and duties defined by law.
Can. 655 Temporary profession is to
be made for the period defined by the institute’s own law. This period may not
be less than three years nor longer than six years.
Can. 656 The validity of temporary
profession requires:
1° that the person making it has completed at least
the eighteenth year of age;
2° that the novitiate has been made validly;
3° that admission has been granted, freely and in
accordance with the norms of law, by the competent Superior, after a vote of
his or her council;
4° that the profession be explicit and made without
force, fear or deceit;
5° that the profession be received by the lawful
Superior, personally or through another.
Can. 657 §1 When the period of time for
which the profession was made has been completed, a religious who freely asks,
and is judged suitable, is to be admitted to a renewal of profession or to
perpetual profession; otherwise, the religious is to leave.
§2 If it seems opportune, the period of temporary
profession can be extended by the competent Superior in accordance with the
institute’s own law. The total time during which the member is bound by
temporary vows may not, however, extend beyond nine years.
§3 Perpetual profession can for a just reason be
anticipated, but not by more than three months.
Can. 658 Besides the conditions
mentioned in can. 656, nn. 3, 4 and 5, and others
attached by the institute’s own law, the validity of perpetual profession
requires:
1° that the person has completed at least the twenty‑first
year of age;
2° that there has been previous temporary profession
for at least three years, without prejudice to the provision of can. 657 §3.
Article 4: The Formation of Religious
Can. 659 §1 After first profession, the
formation of all members in each institute is to be completed, so that they may
lead the life proper to the institute more fully, and fulfil its mission more
effectively.
§2 The institute’s own law is, therefore, to define
the nature and duration of this formation. In this, the needs of the Church and
the conditions of people and times are to be kept in mind, insofar as this is
required by the purpose and the character of the institute.
§3 The formation of members who are being prepared for
sacred orders is governed by the universal law and the institute’s own program
of studies.
Can. 660 §1 Formation is to be
systematic, adapted to the capacity of the members, spiritual and apostolic,
both doctrinal and practical. Suitable ecclesiastical and civil degrees are to
be obtained as opportunity offers.
§2 During the period of formation members are not to
be given offices and undertakings which hinder their formation.
Can. 661 Religious are to be
diligent in continuing their spiritual, doctrinal and practical formation
throughout their lives. Superiors are to ensure that they have the assistance
and the time to do this.
Can. 662 Religious are to find their
supreme rule of life in the following of Christ as proposed in the Gospel and
as expressed in the constitutions of their own institute.
Can. 663 §1 The first and principal
duty of all religious is to be the contemplation of things divine and constant
union with God in prayer.
§2 Each day the members are to make every effort to
participate in the Eucharistic sacrifice, receive the most holy Body of Christ
and adore the Lord himself present in the Sacrament.
§3 They are to devote themselves to reading the sacred
Scriptures and to mental prayer. In accordance with the provisions of their own
law, they are to celebrate the liturgy of the hours worthily, without prejudice
to the obligation of clerics mentioned in can. 276 §2, n. 3. They are also to
perform other exercises of piety.
§4 They are to have a special devotion to the Virgin
Mother of God, the example and protectress of all consecrated life, including
by way of the rosary.
§5 They are faithfully to observe the period of annual
retreat.
Can. 664 Religious are earnestly to
strive for the conversion of soul to God. They are to examine their consciences
daily, and to approach the sacrament of penance frequently
Can. 665 §1 Religious are to reside in their own religious house and observe the common life; they are not to stay elsewhere except with the permission of the Superior. For a lengthy absence from the religious house, the major Superior, for a just reason and with the consent of the council, can authorise a member to live outside a house of the institute; such an absence is not to exceed one year, unless it be for reasons of health, studies or an apostolate to be exercised in the name of the institute.
[See Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated life and Societies of Apostolic Life, Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018:
176. “The limitation in the Instruction Verbi Sponsa, n. 17 §2 (“It should be noted that the norm of can. 665 §1, on permanence outside the Institute, does not regard enclosed nuns”), has been repealed; for just cause the Major Superior, according to the norm of can. 665 §1 CIC, with the consent of her Council, may authorize the absence from the monastery of a nun with solemn vows for not more than a year, after hearing the diocesan Bishop or the competent religious Ordinary”]
§2 Members who unlawfully absent themselves from a
religious house with the intention of withdrawing from the authority of
Superiors, are to be carefully sought out and helped to return and to persevere
in their vocation.
Can. 666 In using the means of
social communication, a necessary discretion is to be observed. Members are to
avoid whatever is harmful to their vocation and dangerous to the chastity of a
consecrated person.
Can. 667 §1 In accordance with the
institute’s own law, there is to be in all houses an enclosure appropriate to
the character and mission of the institute. Some part of the house is always to
be reserved to the members alone.
§2 A stricter discipline of enclosure is to be
observed in monasteries which are devoted to the contemplative life.
§3 Monasteries of cloistered nuns who are wholly
devoted to the contemplative life, must observe papal enclosure, that is, in
accordance with the norms given by the Apostolic See. Other monasteries of
cloistered nuns are to observe an enclosure which is appropriate to their
nature and is defined in the constitutions.
§4 The diocesan Bishop has the faculty of entering, for a just reason, the enclosure of cloistered nuns whose monasteries are situated in his diocese. For a grave reason and with the assent of the Abbess, he can permit others to be admitted to the enclosure, and permit the nuns to leave the enclosure for whatever time is truly necessary.
[See Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated life and Societies of Apostolic Life, Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018:
83. “All female monasteries, without prejudice
to internal autonomy and possible external exemption are subject to the
diocesan Bishop, who exercises pastoral care in the following cases: … g) the
diocesan Bishop has the faculty, for a just cause, of entering the cloister and
allowing other people to enter, with the consent of the Major Superior”
(partial derogation from can. 667 §4 CIC approved by the Holy Father in forma specifica);
174. “In derogation from the provision of can.
667 §4 CIC, the diocesan Bishop, as well as the religious Ordinary, does not
intervene in granting dispensation from the cloister”
(exemption approved by the Holy Father in
forma specifica);
175. “In derogation of the provisions of can.
667 §4 CIC, the dispensation from the cloister rests solely with the Major
Superior who, in the event that such dispensation exceeds fifteen days, can
grant it only after having obtained the consent of her Council”
(exemption approved by the Holy Father in
forma specifica)]
Can. 668 §1 Before their first
profession, members are to cede the administration of their goods to whomsoever
they wish and, unless the constitutions provide otherwise, they are freely to
make dispositions concerning the use and enjoyment of these goods. At least before
perpetual profession, they are to make a will which is valid also in civil law.
§2 To change these dispositions for a just reason, and
to take any action concerning temporal goods, there is required the permission
of the Superior who is competent in accordance with the institute’s own law.
§3 Whatever a religious acquires by personal labour,
or on behalf of the institute, belongs to the institute. Whatever comes to a
religious in any way through pension, grant or insurance also passes to the
institute, unless the institute’s own law decrees otherwise.
§4 When the nature of an institute requires members to
renounce their goods totally, this renunciation is to be made before perpetual
profession and, as far as possible, in a form that is valid also in civil law;
it shall come into effect from the day of profession. The same procedure is to
be followed by a perpetually professed religious who, in accordance with the
norms of the institute’s own law and with the permission of the supreme
Moderator, wishes to renounce goods, in whole or in part.
§5 Professed religious who, because of the nature of
their institute, totally renounce their goods, lose the capacity to acquire and
possess goods; actions of theirs contrary to the vow of poverty are therefore
invalid. Whatever they acquire after renunciation belongs to the institute, in
accordance with the institute’s own law.
Can. 669 §1 As a sign of their
consecration and as a witness to poverty, religious are to wear the habit of
their institute, determined in accordance with the institute’s own law.
§2 Religious of a clerical institute who do not have a
special habit are to wear clerical dress, in accordance with can. 284.
Can. 670 The institute must supply
the members with everything that, in accordance with the constitutions, is
necessary to fulfil the purpose of their vocation.
Can. 671 Religious are not to
undertake tasks and offices outside their own institute without the permission
of the lawful Superior.
Can. 672 Religious are bound by the
provisions of cann. 277, 285, 286, 287 and 289.
Religious who are clerics are also bound by the provisions of can. 279 §2. In
lay institutes of pontifical right, the permission mentioned in can. 285 §4 can
be given by the major Superior.
Can. 673 The apostolate of all
religious consists primarily in the witness of their consecrated life, which
they are bound to foster through prayer and penance.
Can. 674 Institutes which are wholly
directed to contemplation always have an outstanding part in the mystical Body
of Christ. They offer to God an exceptional sacrifice of praise. They embellish
the people of God with very rich fruits of holiness, move them by their
example, and give them increase by a hidden apostolic fruitfulness. Because of
this, no matter how urgent the needs of the active apostolate, the members of
these institutes cannot be called upon to assist in the various pastoral
ministries.
Can. 675 §1 Apostolic action is of the
very nature of institutes dedicated to apostolic works. The whole life of the
members is, therefore, to be imbued with an apostolic spirit, and the whole of
their apostolic action is to be animated by a religious spirit.
§2 Apostolic action is always to proceed from intimate
union with God, and is to confirm and foster this union.
§3 Apostolic action exercised in the name of the
Church and by its command is to be performed in communion with the Church.
Can. 676 Lay institutes of men and
women participate in the pastoral mission of the Church through the spiritual
and corporal works of mercy, performing very many different services for
people. They are therefore to remain faithful to the grace of their vocation.
Can. 677 §1 Superiors and members are
faithfully to hold fast to the mission and works which are proper to their
institute. According to the needs of time and place, however, they are
prudently to adapt them, making use of new and appropriate means.
§2 Institutes which have associations of Christ’s
faithful joined to them are to have a special care that these associations are
imbued with the genuine spirit of their family.
Can. 678 §1 In matters concerning the
care of souls, the public exercise of divine worship and other works of the
apostolate, religious are subject to the authority of the Bishops, whom they
are bound to treat with sincere obedience and reverence.
§2 In the exercise of an apostolate towards persons
outside the institute, religious are also subject to their own Superiors and
must remain faithful to the discipline of the institute. If the need arises,
Bishops themselves are not to fail to insist on this obligation.
§3 In directing the apostolic works of religious,
diocesan Bishops and religious Superiors must proceed by way of mutual
consultation.
Can. 679 For a very grave reason a
diocesan Bishop can forbid a member of a religious institute to remain in his
diocese, provided the person’s major Superior has been informed and has failed
to act; the matter must immediately be reported to the Holy See.
Can. 680 Organised cooperation is to
be fostered among different institutes, and between them and the secular
clergy. Under the direction of the Bishop, there is to be a coordination of all
apostolic works and actions, with due respect for the character and purpose of
each institute and the laws of its foundation.
Can. 681 §1 Works which the diocesan
Bishop entrusts to religious are under the authority and direction of the
Bishop, without prejudice to the rights of religious Superiors in accordance
with can. 678 §§2 and 3.
§2 In these cases a written agreement is to be made
between the diocesan Bishop and the competent Superior of the institute. This
agreement must expressly and accurately define, among other things, the work to
be done, the members to be assigned to it and the financial arrangements.
Can. 682 §1 If an ecclesiastical office
in a diocese is to be conferred on a member of a religious institute, the
religious is appointed by the diocesan Bishop on presentation by, or at least
with the consent of, the competent Superior.
§2 The religious can be removed from the office at the
discretion of the authority who made the appointment, with prior notice being
given to the religious Superior; or by the religious Superior, with prior
notice being given to the appointing authority. Neither requires the other’s
consent.
Can. 683 §1 Either personally or
through a delegate, the diocesan Bishop can visit churches or oratories to
which Christ’s faithful have habitual access, schools other than those open
only to the institute’s own members, and other works of religion and charity
entrusted to religious, whether these works be spiritual or temporal. He can do
this at the time of pastoral visitation, or in a case of necessity.
§2 If the diocesan Bishop becomes aware of abuses, and
a warning to the religious Superior having been in vain, he can by his own
authority deal with the matter.
Article 1: Transfer to another Institute
Can. 684 §1 Perpetually professed
members cannot transfer from their own religious institute to another, except
by permission of the supreme Moderators of both institutes, given with the
consent of their respective councils.
§2 On completion of a probationary period of at least
three years, the member can be admitted to perpetual profession in the new
institute. A member who refuses to make this profession, or is not admitted to
do so by the competent Superiors, is to return to the original institute,
unless an indult of secularisation has been obtained.
§3 For a religious to transfer from one autonomous monastery to another monastery of the same institute, federation or confederation, the consent of the major Superior of both monasteries and of the chapter of the receiving monastery is required and is sufficient, unless the institute’s own law has established further conditions. A new profession is not required.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 684 §3, 20.VI.1987 clarifies that the term
“religious” in can. 684 §3 applies to religious in temporary vows as well
as to those in perpetual vows]
§4 The institute’s own law is to determine the time
and manner of the probation which must precede the member’s profession in the
new institute.
§5 To transfer to a secular institute or to a society
of apostolic life, or to transfer from these to a religious institute, the
permission of the Holy See is required and its instructions are to be followed.
Can. 685 §1 Until profession is made in
the new institute, the rights and obligations of the member in the previous
institute are suspended, but the vows remain. From the beginning of probation,
the member is bound to observe the laws of the new institute.
§2 By profession in the new institute the member is
incorporated into it, and the earlier vows, rights and obligations cease.
Article 2: Departure from the Institute
Can. 686 §1 With the consent of the council, the supreme moderator for a grave cause can grant an indult of exclaustration to a member professed by perpetual vows, but not for more than five years, and if it concerns a cleric, with the prior consent of the ordinary of the place in which he must reside. To extend an indult or to grant it for more than five years is reserved to the Holy See, or to the diocesan bishop if it concerns institutes of diocesan right.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
§2 Only the Apostolic See can grant an indult of exclaustration for cloistered nuns.
[See Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated life and Societies of Apostolic Life, Instruction Cor Orans, 1 April 2018:
130. “In exemption of can. 686 §2 CIC, the
Federal Council gives its consent for the request of the indult of
exclaustration for a nun of solemn vows, after the year granted by the Major
Superior of the monastery, up to the completion of three years”
(exemption approved by the Holy Father in
forma specifica);
131. “The Federal Council gives its consent for
the request for the extension of the indult of exclaustration for a nun of
solemn vows, to be requested from the Holy See”
(exemption approved by the Holy Father in
forma specifica);
177. “In derogation of can. 686 §2 CIC, the
Major Superior, with the consent of her Council, can grant the indult of
exclaustration to a nun professed with solemn vows, for not more than a year,
after the consent of the Ordinary of the place where the nun will have to live,
and after having heard the opinion of the diocesan Bishop or of the competent
religious Ordinary”
(exemption approved by the Holy Father in
forma specifica);
178. “In derogation of can. 686 §2 CIC, an
extension of the indult of exclaustration can be granted by the Federal
President with the consent of her Council, for a nun professed with solemn vows
of a monastery of the Federation for a period of no more than two years”
(exemption approved by the Holy Father in
forma specifica)]
§3 At the request of the supreme Moderator acting with
the consent of his or her council, exclaustration can be imposed by the Holy
See on a member of an institute of pontifical right, or by a diocesan Bishop on
a member of an institute of diocesan right. In either case a grave reason is
required, and equity and charity are to be observed.
Can. 687 Members who are
exclaustrated are considered as dispensed from those obligations which are
incompatible with their new condition of life. They remain dependent on and
under the care of their Superiors and, particularly in the case of a cleric, of
the local Ordinary. They may wear the religious habit, unless the indult
specifies otherwise, but they lack active and passive voice.
Can. 688 §1 A person who, on completion
of the time of temporary profession, wishes to leave the institute, is free to
do so.
§2 During the time of temporary profession, a person who asks to leave the institute for a grave cause can obtain an indult of departure from the supreme moderator with the consent of his or her council; in the case of an autonomous monastery, mentioned in can. 615, however, the bishop of the house of assignment must confirm the indult for it to be valid.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
Can. 689 §1 The competent major
Superior, after consulting his or council, can for just reasons exclude a
member from making further profession on the completion of temporary
profession.
§2 Even though contracted after profession, a
physical or psychological infirmity which, in the judgement of experts, renders
the member mentioned in §1 unsuited to lead a life in the institute,
constitutes a reason for not admitting the member to renewal of profession or
to perpetual profession, unless the infirmity was contracted through the
negligence of the institute or because of work performed in the institute.
§3 A religious who becomes insane during the period of
temporary vows cannot be dismissed from the institute, even though unable to
make a new profession.
Can. 690 §1 A person who lawfully
leaves the institute after completing the novitiate or after profession, can be
re‑admitted by the supreme Moderator, with the consent of his or her
council, without the obligation of repeating the novitiate. The same Moderator
is to determine an appropriate probation prior to temporary profession, and the
length of time in vows before making perpetual profession, in accordance with
the norms of can. 655 and 657.
§2 The Superior of an autonomous monastery, acting
with the consent of his or her council, has the same faculty.
Can. 691 §1 A perpetually professed
religious is not to seek an indult to leave the
institute, except for very grave reasons, weighed before the Lord. The petition
is to be presented to the supreme Moderator of the institute, who will forward
it to the competent authority with his or her own opinion and that of the
council.
§2 In institutes of pontifical right this indult is
reserved to the Apostolic See. In institutes of diocesan right the indult can
be granted by the Bishop in whose diocese is located the house to which the
religious is assigned.
Can. 692 An indult to leave the
institute, which is lawfully granted and notified to the member, by virtue of
the law itself carries with it, unless it has been rejected by the member in
the act of notification, a dispensation from the vows and from all obligations
arising from profession.
Can. 693 If the member is a cleric,
the indult is not granted until he has found a Bishop who will incardinate him
in his diocese or at least receive him there on probation. If he is received on
probation, he is by virtue of the law itself incardinated in the diocese after
five years, unless the Bishop has rejected him.
Article 3: The Dismissal of Members
Can. 694 §1 A religious must be
held as dismissed ipso facto from an institute who:
1° has defected notoriously from
the Catholic faith;
2° has contracted marriage or
attempted it, even only civilly;
3° has been illegitimately
absent from the religious house, pursuant to can. 665 §2, for 12 consecutive
months, taking into account that the location of the religious himself or
herself may be unknown.
§2 In such cases the Major
Superior, with his or her council and without hesitation, having gathered the
evidence, must issue the statement of the case so that the dismissal may be
juridically constituted.
§3 In the case envisaged by §1, n. 3, in order to be juridically constituted, this statement must be confirmed by the Holy See; for institutes of diocesan right the confirmation rests with the Bishop of the principal See.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Communis vita, 19.III.2019]
Can. 695 §1 A member must be dismissed for the offences mentioned in cann. 1395, 1397, and 1398, unless, for the offences mentioned in can. 1395 §§2-3 and 1398 §1, the Superior judges that dismissal is not absolutely necessary; and that sufficient provision can be made in some other way for the amendment of the member, the restoration of justice and the reparation of scandal.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Recognitum Librum VI,
26.IV.2022]
§2 In these cases the major Superior is to collect the
evidence concerning the facts and the imputability of the offence. The
accusation and the evidence are then to be presented to the member, who shall
be given the opportunity for defence. All the acts, signed by the major
Superior and the notary, are to be forwarded, together with the written and
signed replies of the member, to the supreme Moderator.
Can. 696 §1 A member can be dismissed
for other causes, provided they are grave, external, imputable and juridically
proven. Among such causes are: habitual neglect of the obligations of
consecrated life; repeated violations of the sacred bonds; obstinate disobedience
to the lawful orders of Superiors in grave matters; grave scandal arising from
the culpable behaviour of the member; obstinate attachment to, or diffusion of,
teachings condemned by the magisterium
of the Church; public adherence to materialistic or atheistic ideologies; the
unlawful absence mentioned in can. 665 §2, if it extends for a period of six
months; other reasons of similar gravity which are perhaps defined in the
institute’s own law.
§2 A member in temporary vows can be dismissed even
for less grave reasons determined in the institute’s own law.
Can. 697 §1 In the cases mentioned in
can. 696, if the major Superior, after consulting his or her council, judges
that the process of dismissal should be commenced:
1° the major Superior is to collect or complete the
evidence;
2° the major Superior is to warn the member in
writing, or before two witnesses, with an explicit caution that dismissal will
follow unless the member reforms. The reasons for dismissal are to be clearly
expressed and the member is to be given every opportunity for defence. If the
warning has no effect, another warning is to be given after an interval of at
least fifteen days;
3° if this latter warning is also ineffectual, and the
major Superior with his or her council judges that there is sufficient proof of
incorrigibility, and that the defence by the member is insufficient, after
fifteen days from the last warning have passed in vain all the acts, signed by
the major Superior and the notary, are to be forwarded, together with the
signed replies of the member, to the supreme Moderator.
Can. 698 In all the cases mentioned
in cann. 695 and 696, the member always retains the
right to communicate with, and send replies directly to, the supreme Moderator.
Can. 699 §1 The supreme Moderator and
his or her council are to proceed in collegial fashion in accurately weighing
the evidence, the arguments, and the defence. For validity, the council must
comprise at least four members. If by a secret vote it is decided to dismiss
the religious, a decree of dismissal is to be drawn up, which for validity must
express at least in summary form the reasons in law and in fact.
§2 In the autonomous monasteries mentioned in can. 615, it belongs to the major superior, with the consent of his or her council, to decide on dismissal.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
Can. 700 A decree of dismissal issued in the case of a professed member takes effect from the time that it is communicated to the member concerned. To be valid, however, the decree must indicate the right which the dismissed possesses to make recourse to the competent authority within thirty days from receiving notification, without the need for the petition in can. 1743 §1. The recourse has suspensive effect.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022, and m.p. Expedit ut iura,
2.IV.2023]
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 700, 17.V.1986 had stated that the decree of
dismissal could only be notified to the person dismissed after its confirmation
by the Holy See, not before. The amended wording of the canon no longer requires
that the decree of dismissal be confirmed by the competent superior prior to
notification.]
Can. 701 By lawful dismissal, both
the vows and the rights and duties deriving from profession automatically
cease. If the member is a cleric, he may not exercise sacred orders until he
finds a Bishop who will, after a suitable probation, receive him into his diocese
in accordance with can. 693, or who will at least allow him to exercise his
sacred orders.
Can. 702 §1 Whoever lawfully leaves a
religious institute or is lawfully dismissed from one, cannot claim anything
from the institute for any work done in it.
§2 The institute, however, is to show equity and
evangelical charity towards the member who is separated from it.
Can. 703 §1 In a case of grave external
scandal, or of extremely grave and imminent harm to the institute, a member can
be expelled forthwith from the house by the major Superior. If there is danger
in delay, this can be done by the local Superior with the consent of his or her
council. The major Superior, if need be, is to introduce a process of dismissal
in accordance with the norms of law, or refer the matter to the Apostolic See.
Can. 704 In the report to be sent to
the Apostolic See in accordance with can. 592 §1, mention is to be made of
members who have been separated in any way from the institute.
Can. 705 A religious who is raised
to the episcopate remains a member of his institute, but is subject only to the
Roman Pontiff by his vow of obedience. He is not bound by obligations which he
prudently judges are not compatible with his condition.
[A religious bishop lacks an active and passive voice in his own
institute.
If a religious is appointed a judge of the Roman Rota, he is not exempt from
the religious Ordinary or from the obligations deriving from the religious
profession (as in the case of religious raised to the episcopate), except in
what concerns the exercise of his office.
See Authentic
Interpretations of canon 705, 17.V.1986 and 23.V.1988]
Can. 706 In the case of the
religious mentioned above:
1° if he has lost the ownership of his goods through
his profession he now has the use and enjoyment and the administration of the
goods which he acquires. In the case of a diocesan Bishop and of those
mentioned in can. 381 §2, the particular Church acquires their ownership; in
the case of others, they belong to the institute or the Holy See, depending on
whether the institute is or is not capable of possessing goods;
2° if he has not lost the ownership of his goods
through his profession, he recovers the use and enjoyment and the
administration of the goods he possessed; what he obtains later, he acquires
fully;
3° in both cases any goods he receives which are not
personal gifts must be disposed of according to the intention of the donors.
Can. 707 §1 A religious Bishop
‘emeritus’ may choose to reside outside the house of his institute, unless the
Apostolic See disposes otherwise.
§2 If he has served a diocese, can. 402 §2 is to be observed concerning his suitable and worthy maintenance, unless his own institute wishes to provide such maintenance. Otherwise, the Apostolic See is to make other provision.
Can. 708 Major Superiors can
usefully meet together in conferences and councils, so that by combined effort
they may work to achieve more fully the purpose of each institute, while
respecting the autonomy, nature and spirit of each. They can also deal with
affairs which are common to all, and work to establish suitable coordination
and cooperation with Episcopal Conferences and with individual Bishops.
Can. 709 Conferences of major
Superiors are to have their own statutes, which must be approved by the Holy
See. Only the Holy See can establish them or give them juridical personality.
They remain under the ultimate direction of the Holy See.
Can. 710 A secular institute is an
institute of consecrated life in which Christ’s faithful, living in the world,
strive for the perfection of charity and endeavour to contribute to the
sanctification of the world, especially from within.
Can. 711 Without prejudice to the
provisions of the law concerning institutes of consecrated life, consecration
as a member of a secular institute does not change the member’s canonical
status among the people of God, be it lay or clerical.
Can. 712 Without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 598‑601, the constitutions are to establish the sacred
bonds by which the evangelical counsels are undertaken in the institute. They
are to define the obligations which these bonds entail, while always preserving
in the manner of life the secular character proper to the institute.
Can. 713 §1 Members of these institutes
express and exercise their special consecration in apostolic activity. Like a
leaven, they endeavour to permeate everything with an evangelical spirit for
the strengthening and growth of the Body of Christ.
§2 Lay members participate in the evangelising mission
of the Church in the world and from within the world. They do this by their
witness of Christian life and of fidelity to their consecration, and by the
assistance they give in directing temporal affairs to God and in animating the
world by the power of the Gospel. They also offer their cooperation to serve
the ecclesial community in accordance with the secular manner of life proper to
them.
§3 Clerical members, by the witness of their
consecrated life, especially in the presbyterium,
support their colleagues by a distinctive apostolic charity, and in the people
of God they further the sanctification of the world by their sacred ministry.
Can. 714 Members are to live their
lives in the ordinary conditions of the world, either alone, in their families
or in fraternal groups, in accordance with the constitutions.
Can. 715 §1 Clerical members
incardinated in a diocese are subject to the diocesan Bishop, except for
whatever concerns the consecrated life of their own institutes.
§2 Those who, in accordance with the norms of can. 266
§3, are incardinated in the institute, and who are appointed to works proper to
the institute or to the governance of the institute, are subject to the Bishop
in the same way as religious.
Can. 716 §1 All members are to take an
active part in the life of the institute, in accordance with the institute’s
own law.
§2 Members of the same institute are to preserve a
rapport with one another, carefully fostering a unity of spirit and a genuine
fraternity.
Can. 717 §1 The constitutions are to
determine the institute’s own form of governance. They are to define the period
of time for which Moderators exercise their office and the manner in which they
are to be designated.
§2 No one is to be designated supreme Moderator unless
definitively incorporated into the institute.
§3 Those entrusted with the governance of the
institute are to ensure that its unity of spirit is maintained, and that the
active participation of the members is developed.
Can. 718 The administration of the
goods of the institute must express and foster evangelical poverty. It is
governed by the norms of Book V on ‘The Temporal Goods of the Church’, and by
the institute’s own law. This same law of the institute is also to define the
obligations, especially the financial obligations, of the institute towards the
members engaged in its work.
Can. 719 §1 Members are to respond
faithfully to their vocation, and their apostolic action is to proceed from
their union with Christ. They are therefore to devote themselves assiduously to
prayer and engage in a suitable way in the reading of the sacred Scriptures.
They are to make an annual retreat and perform other spiritual exercises in
accordance with their own law.
§2 The celebration of the Eucharist, daily where
possible, is to be the source and strength of their whole consecrated life.
§3 They are to go freely to the sacrament of penance
and receive it frequently.
§4 They are to be free to obtain the necessary
spiritual direction. Should they so desire, they may seek such counsel even
from their Moderators.
Can. 720 The right of admitting a
person to the institute, or to probation, or to the taking of sacred bonds,
both temporary and perpetual or definitive, belongs to the major Moderators
with their council, in accordance with the constitutions.
Can. 721 §1 The following are invalidly
admitted to initial probation:
1° one who has not yet attained majority;
2° one who is currently bound by a sacred bond in
another institute of consecrated life, or incorporated in a society of
apostolic life;
3° a spouse, while the marriage lasts.
§2 The constitutions can establish other impediments
to admission, even for validity, or attach conditions to it.
§3 For a person to be received into the institute,
that degree of maturity is required which is necessary to live the life of the
institute properly.
Can. 722 §1 The initial probation is to
be so arranged that the candidates can better recognise their divine vocation
and their vocation to that institute, and be trained in the spirit and manner
of life of the institute.
§2 Candidates are to be properly formed to live a life
according to the evangelical counsels. They are to be taught how to translate
this life completely into their apostolate, applying those forms of
evangelisation which best correspond to the purpose, spirit and character of
the institute.
§3 The constitutions are to define the manner and time
of the probation to be made before the first sacred bonds are undertaken in the
institute; this time is to be not less than two years.
Can. 723 §1 When the time of the
initial probation has been completed, a candidate who is judged suitable is
either to undertake the three evangelical counsels, sealed with a sacred bond,
or to leave the institute.
§2 This first incorporation is to be temporary, in
accordance with the constitutions, but is to be for not less than five years.
§3 When this period of incorporation has been
completed, a member who is judged suitable is to be admitted to perpetual, or
definitive incorporation, that is, by temporary bonds always to be renewed.
§4 Definitive incorporation is equivalent to perpetual
incorporation in respect of defined juridical effects, which are to be
established in the constitutions.
Can. 724 §1 After the first acceptance
of the sacred bonds, formation is to continue without interruption in
accordance with the constitutions.
§2 Members are to be formed simultaneously in matters
human and divine. The Moderators of the institute are to have a serious concern
for the continued spiritual formation of the members.
Can. 725 The institute can associate
with itself, by some form of bond determined in the constitutions, other
members of Christ’s faithful who seek evangelical perfection according to the
spirit of the institute and who share in its mission.
Can. 726 §1 When the time of temporary
incorporation is completed, the member can freely leave the institute, or can
for a just cause be excluded from renewing the sacred bonds by the major
Moderator, after consultation with his or her council.
§2 A temporarily incorporated member who freely
requests it, can for a grave reason be granted an indult
to leave the institute by the supreme Moderator, with the consent of the
council.
Can. 727 §1 A perpetually incorporated
member who wishes to leave the institute must, after seriously weighing the
matter before the Lord, petition the Apostolic See through the supreme
Moderator, if the institute is of pontifical right; otherwise, the indult can also
be obtained from the diocesan Bishop, as determined in the constitutions.
§2 For a cleric who is incardinated in the institute,
the provision of can. 693 is to be observed.
Can. 728 When an indult
to leave the institute has been lawfully granted, all bonds, rights and
obligations deriving from incorporation cease.
Can. 729 Dismissal of a member of the institute proceeds pursuant to cann. 694 §1, 1 and 2; and 695. The constitutions may also define other causes for dismissal, provided that they be commensurately serious, external, attributable and juridically proven, and that the procedure in cann. 697-700 also be observed. The provisions of can. 701 are applicable to the dismissed member.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Communis vita, 19.III.2019]
Can. 730 For a member to transfer
from one secular institute to another, the provisions of can. 684 §§1, 2, 4 and
685, are to be observed. A transfer to or from another kind of institute of
consecrated life requires the permission of the Apostolic See, whose instructions
must be followed.
Can. 731 §1 Societies of apostolic
life resemble institutes of consecrated life. Their members, without taking
religious vows, pursue the apostolic purpose proper to each society. Living a
fraternal life in common in their own special manner, they strive for the
perfection of charity through the observance of the constitutions.
§2 Among these societies are some in which the
members, through a bond defined in the constitutions, undertake to live the
evangelical counsels.
Can. 732 Cann.
578‑597 and 606 apply to societies of apostolic life, with due regard,
however, for the nature of each society. For the societies mentioned in can.
731 §2, cann. 598‑602 also apply.
Can. 733 §1 A house is established and
a local community is constituted by the competent authority of the society,
with the prior written consent of the diocesan Bishop. The Bishop must also be
consulted when there is question of its suppression.
§2 Consent to establish a house carries with it the
right to have at least an oratory in which the blessed Eucharist is celebrated
and reserved.
Can. 734 The governance of the
society is determined by the constitutions, without prejudice, in accordance
with the nature of each society, to cann. 617‑633.
Can. 735 §1 The admission, probation,
incorporation and formation of members are determined by each society’s own
law.
§2 For admission into the society, the conditions
prescribed in cann. 642‑645 are to be observed.
§3 The society’s own law must determine a programme of
doctrinal, spiritual and apostolic probation and formation that is adapted to
the purpose and character of the society. In this way members can recognise
their divine vocation and be suitably prepared for the mission and way of life
of the society.
Can. 736 §1 In clerical societies, the
clerics are incardinated into the society, unless the constitutions determine
otherwise.
§2 The norms concerning the secular clergy apply to
the programme of studies and reception of orders, without prejudice to §1.
Can. 737 For the members,
incorporation carries with it the rights and obligations defined in the
constitutions. On the part of the society, it implies a responsibility to lead
the members towards the purpose of their vocation, in accordance with the
constitutions.
Can. 738 §1 All members are subject to
their own Moderators in matters concerning the internal life and discipline of
the society, in accordance with the constitutions.
§2 They are also subject to the diocesan Bishop in
matters concerning public worship, the care of souls and other works of the
apostolate, with due regard to cann. 679‑683.
§3 The relationship between a member who is
incardinated in a diocese and his proper Bishop is to be defined in the
constitutions or in particular agreements.
Can. 739 Apart from the obligations
which derive from their constitutions, members are bound by the common
obligations of clerics, unless the nature of things or the context indicates
otherwise.
Can. 740 Members must live in a
lawfully constituted house or community and observe a common life, in
accordance with their own law. This same law also governs their absence from
the house or community.
Can. 741 §1 Societies and, unless the
constitutions provide otherwise, their constituent parts and their houses, are
juridical persons. As such, they are capable of acquiring, possessing,
administering and alienating temporal goods in accordance with the provisions
of Book V on ‘The Temporal Goods of the Church’, of cann.
636, 638 and 639, and of their own law.
§2 Members are also capable, in accordance with their
own law, of acquiring, possessing, administering and disposing of temporal
goods, but whatever comes to them in view of the society is acquired for the
society.
Can. 742 The departure and dismissal
of a member who is not definitively incorporated are governed by the
constitutions of each society.
Can. 743 A member who is
definitively incorporated can obtain an indult to
leave the society from the supreme Moderator with the consent of the council,
unless the constitutions reserve this to the Apostolic See. This indult means
that the rights and obligations deriving from definitive incorporation cease,
without prejudice to can. 693.
Can. 744 §1 Permission for a member who
is definitively incorporated to transfer to another society of apostolic life
is likewise reserved to the supreme Moderator with the consent of his or her
council. The rights and obligations of the member’s own society are suspended
for the time being, but the member has the right to return to it before
definitive incorporation into the new society.
§2 To transfer to an institute of consecrated life or
from such an institute to a society of apostolic life, the permission of the
Holy See is required, and its instructions are to be followed.
Can. 745 The supreme Moderator, with
the consent of his or her council, can grant a definitively incorporated member
an indult to live outside the society for a period
not exceeding three years. Rights and obligations which are not compatible with
this new condition are suspended, but the member remains under the care of the
Moderators. If the member is a cleric, the consent of the Ordinary of the place
where he must reside is also required, and the member remains under the care of
the Ordinary and dependent upon him.
Can. 746 For the dismissal of a
member who is definitively incorporated, the provisions of cann.
694‑704 are to be observed, making the appropriate adjustments.
Can. 747 §1 It is the obligation and
inherent right of the Church, independent of any human authority, to preach the
Gospel to all peoples, using for this purpose even its own means of social
communication, for it is to the Church that Christ the Lord entrusted the
deposit of faith, so that by the assistance of the Holy Spirit, it might
conscientiously guard revealed truth, more intimately penetrate it, and
faithfully proclaim and expound it.
§2 The Church has the right always and everywhere to
proclaim moral principles, even in respect of the social order, and to make
judgements about any human matter in so far as this is required by fundamental
human rights or the salvation of souls.
Can. 748 §1 All are bound to seek the
truth in the matters which concern God and his Church; when they have found it,
then by divine law they are bound, and they have the right, to embrace and keep
it.
§2 It is never lawful for anyone to force others to
embrace the Catholic faith against their conscience.
Can. 749 §1 In virtue of his office the
Supreme Pontiff is infallible in his teaching when, as chief Shepherd and
Teacher of all Christ’s faithful, with the duty of strengthening his brethren
in the faith, he proclaims by definitive act a doctrine to be held concerning
faith or morals.
§2 The College of Bishops also possesses infallibility
in its teaching when the Bishops, gathered together in an Ecumenical Council
and exercising their magisterium as
teachers and judges of faith and morals, definitively declare for the universal
Church a doctrine to be held concerning faith or morals; likewise, when the
Bishops, dispersed throughout the world but maintaining the bond of union among
themselves and with the successor of Peter, together with the same Roman
Pontiff authentically teach matters of faith or morals, and are agreed that a
particular teaching is definitively to be held.
§3 No doctrine is understood to be infallibly defined
unless this is manifestly demonstrated.
Can. 750 §1 Those things are to be
believed by divine and Catholic faith which are contained in the word of God as
it has been written down or handed down by tradition, that is, in the single
deposit of faith entrusted to the Church, and which are at the same time
proposed as divinely revealed either by the solemn magisterium of the Church, or by its ordinary and universal magisterium, which is manifested by the
common adherence of Christ’s faithful under the guidance of the sacred magisterium. All are therefore bound to
shun any contrary doctrines.
§2 The faithful are also required to accept and hold each and every one of the teachings that are definitively proposed by the Church’s magisterium regarding faith or morals, which are required to safeguard the deposit of the faith reverently and to expound it faithfully. Anyone who denies that these propositions are to be held definitively is therefore opposed to the Church’s teaching.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Ad tuendam fidem, 18.V.1998]
Can. 751 Heresy is the obstinate
denial or doubt, after baptism, of a truth which must be believed by divine and
Catholic faith. Apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith.
Schism is the withdrawal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or from communion
with the members of the Church subject to him.
Can. 752 While the assent of faith
is not required, a religious submission of intellect and will is to be given to
any doctrine which either the Supreme Pontiff or the College of Bishops,
exercising their authentic magisterium,
declare upon a matter of faith or morals, even though they do not intend to
proclaim that doctrine by definitive act. Christ’s faithful are therefore to
ensure that they avoid whatever does not accord with that doctrine.
Can. 753 Whether they teach
individually, or in Episcopal Conferences, or gathered together in particular
councils, Bishops in communion with the head and the members of the College,
while not infallible in their teaching, are the authentic instructors and teachers
of the faith for Christ’s faithful entrusted to their care. The faithful are
bound to adhere, with a religious submission of mind, to this authentic magisterium of their Bishops.
[Chapter IV of the m.p. Apostolos suos, 21.V.1998, specifies how the Episcopal Conference should act before laying down an act of authentic magisterium]
Can. 754 All Christ’s faithful are
obliged to observe the constitutions and decrees which lawful ecclesiastical
authority issues for the purpose of proposing doctrine or of proscribing
erroneous opinions; this is particularly the case of those published by the Roman
Pontiff or by the College of Bishops.
Can. 755 §1 It pertains especially to
the entire College of Bishops and to the Apostolic See to foster and direct
among Catholics the ecumenical movement, the purpose of which is the
restoration of unity between all Christians which, by the will of Christ, the
Church is bound to promote.
§2 It is a matter likewise for Bishops and, in
accordance with the law, for Episcopal Conferences, to promote this same unity
and, in line with the various needs and opportunities of the circumstances, to
issue practical norms which accord with the provisions laid down by the supreme
authority of the Church.
Can. 756 §1 The office of preaching the
Gospel to the whole Church has been committed principally to the Roman Pontiff
and to the College of Bishops.
§2 For the particular Churches entrusted to them, that
office is exercised by the individual Bishops, who are the moderators of the
entire ministry of the word in their Churches. Sometimes, however, in
accordance with the law, a number of Bishops simultaneously carry out that
office together in respect of a number of different Churches.
Can. 757 It belongs to priests, as
co‑operators of the Bishops, to proclaim the Gospel of God. For the
people entrusted to their care, this task rests especially on parish priests,
and on other priests entrusted with the care of souls. Deacons also are to
serve the people of God in the ministry of the word, in union with the Bishop
and his presbyterium.
Can. 758 By reason of their
consecration to God, members of institutes of consecrated life bear particular
witness to the Gospel, and so are fittingly called upon by the Bishop to help
in proclaiming the Gospel.
Can. 759 The lay members of Christ’s
faithful, by reason of their baptism and confirmation, are witnesses to the
good news of the Gospel, by their words and by the example of their Christian
life. They can also be called upon to cooperate with Bishops and priests in the
exercise of the ministry of the word.
Can. 760 The mystery of Christ is to
be faithfully and fully presented in the ministry of the word, which must be
founded upon sacred Scripture, Tradition, liturgy and the magisterium and life of the Church.
Can. 761 While pride of place must
always be given to preaching and catechetical instruction, all the available
means of proclaiming Christian doctrine are to be used: the exposition of
doctrine in schools, in institutes of higher learning, at conferences and
meetings of all kinds; public declarations by lawful authority on the occasion
of certain events; the printed word and other means of social communication.
Can. 762 The people of God are first
united through the word of the living God, and are fully entitled to seek this
word from their priests. For this reason sacred ministers are to consider the
office of preaching as of great importance, since proclaiming the Gospel of God
to all is among their principal duties.
Can. 763 Bishops have the right to
preach the word of God everywhere, even in churches and oratories of religious
institutes of pontifical right, unless the local Bishop has expressly forbidden
it in particular cases.
Can. 764 Without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 765, priests and deacons, with the at least presumed consent
of the rector of a church, have the faculty to preach everywhere, unless this
faculty has been restricted or removed by the competent Ordinary, or unless
particular law requires express permission.
Can. 765 To preach to religious in
their churches or oratories, permission is required of the Superior who is
competent according to their constitutions.
Can. 766 The laity may be allowed to
preach in a church or oratory if in certain circumstances it is necessary, or
in particular cases it would be advantageous, according to the provisions of
the Episcopal Conference and without prejudice to can. 767 §1.
Can. 767 §1 The most important form of preaching is the homily, which is part of the liturgy, and is reserved to a priest or deacon. In the course of the liturgical year, the mysteries of faith and the rules of Christian living are to be expounded in the homily from the sacred text.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 767 §1, 20.VI.1987 declares that the bishop may not
dispense from the reservation of the homily to a priest or deacon; see also the
guidance in no. 59 of the post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation Verbum
Domini, 30.IX.2010]
§2 At all Masses on Sundays and holydays of
obligation, celebrated with a congregation, there is to be a homily and, except
for a grave reason, this may not be omitted.
§3 It is strongly recommended that, if a sufficient
number of people are present, there be a homily at weekday Masses also,
especially during Advent and Lent, or on a feast day or an occasion of grief.
§4 It is the responsibility of the parish priest or
the rector of a church to ensure that these provisions are carefully observed.
Can. 768 §1 Those who announce the word
of God to Christ’s faithful are first and foremost to set out those things
which it is necessary to believe and to practise for the glory of God and the
salvation of all.
§2 They are also to explain to the faithful the
teaching of the magisterium of the
Church concerning the dignity and freedom of the human person; the unity,
stability and duties of the family; people’s social obligations and the
ordering of temporal affairs according to the plan established by God.
Can. 769 Christian teaching is to be
explained in a manner that is suited to the condition of the hearers and
adapted to the circumstances of the times.
Can. 770 At certain times, according
to the regulations of the diocesan Bishop, parish priests are to arrange for
sermons in the form of retreats and missions, as they are called, or in other
forms adapted to requirements.
Can. 771 §1 Pastors of souls,
especially Bishops and parish priests, are to be solicitous that the word of
God is preached to those also of the faithful who, because of the circumstances
of their lives, cannot sufficiently avail themselves of the ordinary pastoral care
or are even totally deprived of it.
§2 They are also to take care that the good news of
the Gospel reaches those living in their territory who are non‑believers,
since these too, no less than the faithful, must be included in the care of
souls.
Can. 772 §1 In the exercise of the
office of preaching, everyone is moreover to observe the norms laid down by the
Bishop of the diocese.
§2 In expounding Christian teaching on radio or
television, the provisions of the Episcopal Conference are to be observed.
Can. 773 It is pastors of souls
especially who have the serious duty of attending to the catechesis of the Christian
people, so that, through doctrinal formation and the experience of the Christian
life, the living faith of the people may be manifest and active.
Can. 774 §1 The care for catechesis, under the direction of lawful ecclesiastical authority, extends to all members of the Church, to each according to his or her role.
[The m.p. Antiquum ministerium, 10.V.2021, institutes
the lay ministry of catechist]
§2 Before all others, parents are bound to form their
children, by word and example, in faith and in Christian living. The same
obligation binds godparents and those who take the place of parents.
Can. 775 §1 While observing provisions
made by the Apostolic See it is the responsibility of diocesan Bishops to issue
norms concerning catechetical matters; to ensure that appropriate means of
catechesis are available, even by preparing a catechism, if this seems opportune;
to foster and to coordinate catechetical initiatives.
§2 If it seems useful, it is for the conference of bishops to take care that catechisms are issued for its territory, with the previous confirmation of the Apostolic See.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
§3 The Episcopal Conference may establish a
catechetical office, whose principal purpose is to assist individual dioceses
in catechetical matters.
Can. 776 By virtue of his office,
the parish priest is bound to ensure the catechetical formation of adults,
young people and children. To this end, he is to avail himself of the help of
clerics attached to the parish, as well as of members of institutes of consecrated
life and of societies of apostolic life, being mindful of the character of each
institute; and the assistance of lay members of Christ’s faithful, especially
catechists. All of these, unless they are lawfully impeded, are not to refuse
to give their labours willingly. The parish priest is also to promote and to
foster the role of parents in the family catechesis mentioned in can. 774 §2.
Can. 777 In a special way, the
parish priest is to ensure, in accordance with the norms laid down by the
diocesan Bishop, that:
1° an adequate catechesis is given for the celebration
of the sacraments;
2° children are properly prepared for first confession
and first holy communion, and for the sacrament of confirmation, by means of
catechetical formation over an appropriate period of time;
3° children, after they have made their first holy
communion, are given a richer and deeper catechetical formation;
4° as far as their condition allows, catechetical
formation is given to the mentally and physically handicapped;
5° the faith of young people and of adults is
strengthened, enlightened and developed by various catechetical methods and
initiatives .
Can. 778 Religious Superiors and
Superiors of societies of apostolic life are to ensure that catechetical
formation is diligently given in their churches and schools, and in other works
in any way entrusted to their care.
Can. 779 Catechetical formation is
to be given by employing all those aids, educational resources and means of
communication which seem the more effective in securing that the faithful,
according to their character capability, age and circumstances of life, may be
more fully steeped in Catholic teaching and prepared to put it into practice.
Can. 780 Local Ordinaries are to
ensure that catechists are duly trained to carry out their office properly,
namely, that continuing formation is available to them, that they have an
appropriate knowledge of the teaching of the Church, and that they learn both the
theory and the practice of the principles of pedagogy.
Can. 781 Because the whole Church is
of its nature missionary and the work of evangelisation is to be considered a
fundamental duty of the people of God, all Christ’s faithful must be conscious
of the responsibility to play their part in missionary activity.
Can. 782 §1 The Roman Pontiff and the
College of Bishops have the responsibility for the overall direction and
coordination of the initiatives and activities which concern missionary work
and cooperation.
§2 As the sponsors of the universal Church and of all
the Churches, all Bishops are to have a special solicitude for missionary
activity, especially by arousing, fostering and sustaining missionary
initiatives in their own particular Churches.
Can. 783 Members of institutes of
consecrated life, because of the dedication to the service of the Church
deriving from their very consecration, have an obligation to play a zealous and
special part in missionary activity, in a manner appropriate to their institute.
Can. 784 Missionaries, that is,
those who have been sent by the competent ecclesiastical authority to engage in
missionary activity, may be chosen from the indigenous population or from
others, be they secular clergy, or members of institutes of consecrated life or
of a society of apostolic life, or other lay members of Christ’s faithful.
Can. 785 §1 Catechists are to be given
a role in missionary work. These are lay members of Christ’s faithful who have
received proper formation and are outstanding in their living of the Christian
life. Under the direction of missionaries, they are to present the Gospel
teaching and engage in liturgical worship and in works of charity.
§2 Catechists are to receive their formation in
schools founded for this purpose. If there are no such schools, they are to be
formed under the direction of the missionaries.
Can. 786 Missionary activity
properly so called, whereby the Church is founded amongst peoples or groups
where it has not taken root before, is performed principally by the Church
sending heralds of the Gospel, until such time as the new Churches are fully
constituted, that is, have their own resources and sufficient means, so that
they themselves can carry on the work of evangelisation.
Can. 787 §1 By the testimony of their
words and of their lives, missionaries are to establish a sincere dialogue with
those who do not believe in Christ, so that, taking their native character and
culture into account, ways may be opened up by which they can be led to know
the good news of the Gospel.
§2 Missionaries are to ensure that they teach the
truths of the faith to those whom they judge to be ready to receive the good
news of the Gospel, so that, if they freely request it, they may be admitted to
the reception of baptism.
Can. 788 §1 Those who have expressed
the wish to embrace faith in Christ, and who have completed the period of their
preliminary catechumenate, are to be admitted to the catechumenate proper in a
liturgical ceremony; and their names are to be inscribed in the book which is
kept for this purpose.
§2 By formation and their first steps in Christian
living, catechumens are to be initiated into the mysteries of salvation, and
introduced into the life of faith, liturgy and charity of the people of God, as
well as into the apostolate.
§3 It is the responsibility of the Episcopal
Conference to establish norms concerning the arrangement of the catechumenate,
determining what should be done by catechumens and what should be their
prerogatives.
Can. 789 By means of appropriate
formation, neophytes are to be led to a deeper knowledge of the Gospel truths,
and to the fulfilment of the duties undertaken in baptism. They are also to be
imbued with a sincere love of Christ and his Church.
Can. 790 §1 In mission territories, it
is the responsibility of the diocesan Bishop:
1° to promote, regulate and coordinate both new
initiatives and established works concerning missionary activity;
2° to ensure that there are proper agreements with the
Moderators of those institutes which dedicate themselves to missionary
activities, and that relationships with them are for the good of the mission.
§2 The provisions made by the diocesan Bishop in
accordance with §1, n. 1 are binding on all missionaries, including religious
and their helpers residing in his territory.
Can. 791 In order to foster
missionary cooperation, in each diocese:
1° vocations to the mission are to be promoted;
2° a priest is to be appointed to promote missionary
initiatives, especially the ‘Pontifical Missionary Works’;
3° a day for the missions is to be celebrated
annually;
4° each year an appropriate financial contribution for
the missions is to be sent to the Holy See.
Can. 792 The Episcopal Conference is
to establish and promote means by which those who come to their territory from
the missions, for the purpose of work or study, are to be given a fraternal
welcome and helped with suitable pastoral care.
Can. 793 §1 Parents, and those who take
their place, have both the obligation and the right to educate their children.
Catholic parents have also the duty and the right to choose those means and
institutes which, in their local circumstances, can best promote the Catholic
education of their children.
§2 Parents have moreover the right to avail themselves
of that assistance from civil society which they need to provide a Catholic
education for their children.
Can. 794 §1 The Church has in a special
way the duty and the right of educating, for it has a divine mission of helping
all to arrive at the fullness of Christian life.
§2 Pastors of souls have the duty of making all
possible arrangements so that all the faithful may avail themselves of a Catholic
education.
Can. 795 Education must pay regard
to the formation of the whole person, so that all may attain their eternal
destiny and at the same time promote the common good of society. Children and
young persons are therefore to be cared for in such a way that their physical,
moral and intellectual talents may develop in a harmonious manner, so that they
may attain a greater sense of responsibility and a right use of freedom, and be
formed to take an active part in social life.
Can. 796 §1 Among the means of
advancing education, Christ’s faithful are to consider schools as of great
importance, since they are the principal means of helping parents to fulfil
their role in education.
§2 There must be the closest cooperation between
parents and the teachers to whom they entrust their children to be educated. In
fulfilling their task, teachers are to collaborate closely with the parents and
willingly listen to them; associations and meetings of parents are to be set up
and held in high esteem.
Can. 797 Parents must have a real
freedom in their choice of schools. For this reason Christ’s faithful must be
watchful that the civil society acknowledges this freedom of parents and, in
accordance with the requirements of distributive justice, even provides them
with assistance.
Can. 798 Parents are to send their
children to those schools which will provide for their Catholic education. If
they cannot do this, they are bound to ensure the proper Catholic education of
their children outside the school.
Can. 799 Christ’s faithful are to
strive to secure that in the civil society the laws which regulate the
formation of the young, also provide a religious and moral education in the
schools that is in accord with the conscience of the parents.
Can. 800 §1 The Church has the right to
establish and to direct schools for any field of study or of any kind and
grade.
§2 Christ’s faithful are to promote Catholic schools,
doing everything possible to help in establishing and maintaining them.
Can. 801 Religious institutes which
have education as their mission are to keep faithfully to this mission and
earnestly strive to devote themselves to Catholic education, providing this
also through their own schools which, with the consent of the diocesan Bishop,
they have established.
Can. 802 §1 If there are no schools in
which an education is provided that is imbued with a Christian spirit, the
diocesan Bishop has the responsibility of ensuring that such schools are
established.
§2 Where it is suitable, the diocesan Bishop is to
provide for the establishment of professional and technical schools, and of
other schools catering for special needs.
Can. 803 §1 A Catholic school is
understood to be one which is under the control of the competent ecclesiastical
authority or of a public ecclesiastical juridical person, or one which in a
written document is acknowledged as Catholic by the ecclesiastical authority.
§2 Formation and education in a Catholic school must
be based on the principles of Catholic doctrine, and the teachers must be
outstanding in true doctrine and uprightness of life.
§3 No school, even if it is in fact Catholic, may bear
the title ‘Catholic school’ except by the consent of the competent
ecclesiastical authority.
Can. 804 §1 The formation and education
in the Catholic religion provided in any school, and through various means of
social communication is subject to the authority of the Church. It is for the
Episcopal Conference to issue general norms concerning this field of activity
and for the diocesan Bishop to regulate and watch over it.
§2 The local Ordinary is to be careful that those who
are appointed as teachers of religion in schools, even non‑Catholic ones,
are outstanding in true doctrine, in the witness of their Christian life, and
in their teaching ability.
Can. 805 In his own diocese, the
local Ordinary has the right to appoint or to approve teachers of religion and,
if religious or moral considerations require it, the right to remove them or to
demand that they be removed.
Can. 806 §1 The diocesan Bishop has the
right to watch over and inspect the Catholic schools situated in his territory,
even those established or directed by members of religious institutes. He has
also the right to issue directives concerning the general regulation of Catholic
schools these directives apply also to schools conducted by members of a
religious institute, although they retain their autonomy in the internal
management of their schools.
§2 Those who are in charge of Catholic schools are to
ensure, under the supervision of the local Ordinary, that the formation given
in them is, in its academic standards, at least as outstanding as that in other
schools in the area.
Can. 807 The Church has the right to
establish and to govern universities, which serve to promote the deeper culture
and fuller development of the human person, and to complement the Church’s own
teaching office.
Can. 808 No university, even if it
is in fact Catholic, may bear the title ‘Catholic university’ except by the
consent of the competent ecclesiastical authority.
Can. 809 If it is possible and
appropriate, Episcopal Conferences are to take care to have within their
territories suitably located universities or at least faculties, in which the
various disciplines, while retaining their own scientific autonomy, may be
researched and taught in the light of Catholic doctrine.
Can. 810 §1 In Catholic universities it
is the duty of the competent statutory authority to ensure that there be
appointed teachers who are not only qualified in scientific and pedagogical
expertise, but are also outstanding in their integrity of doctrine and
uprightness of life. If these requirements are found to be lacking, it is also
that authority’s duty to see to it that these teachers are removed from office,
in accordance with the procedure determined in the statutes.
§2 The Episcopal Conference and the diocesan Bishops
concerned have the duty and the right of seeing to it that, in these
universities, the principles of Catholic doctrine are faithfully observed.
Can. 811 §1 The competent
ecclesiastical authority is to ensure that in Catholic universities there is
established a faculty or an institute or at least a chair of theology, in which
lectures are given to lay students also.
§2 In every Catholic university there are to be
lectures which principally treat of those theological questions connected with
the studies of each faculty.
Can. 812 Those who teach theological
subjects in any institute of higher studies must have a mandate from the
competent ecclesiastical authority.
Can. 813 The diocesan Bishop is to
be zealous in his pastoral care of students, even by the creation of a special
parish, or at least by appointing priests with a stable assignment to this
care. In all universities, even in those which are not Catholic, the diocesan
Bishop is to provide Catholic university centres, to be of assistance to the
young people, especially in spiritual matters.
Can. 814 The provisions which are
laid down for universities apply equally to other institutes of higher studies.
Can. 815 By virtue of its office to
announce revealed truth, it belongs to the Church to have its own
ecclesiastical universities and faculties to study the sacred sciences and
subjects related to them, and to teach these disciplines to students in a
scientific manner.
Can. 816 §1 Ecclesiastical universities
and faculties may be constituted only by the Apostolic See or with its
approval. Their overall direction also belongs to the Apostolic See.
§2 Each ecclesiastical university and faculty must
have its own statutes and program of studies, approved by the Apostolic See.
Can. 817 Only a university or a
faculty established or approved by the Apostolic See may confer academic
degrees which have canonical effects in the Church.
Can. 818 The provisions of cann. 810, 812 and 813 concerning Catholic universities
apply also to ecclesiastical universities and faculties.
Can. 819 In so far as the good of a
diocese or religious institute or indeed even of the universal Church requires
it, young persons, clerics and members of institutes, outstanding in character,
intelligence and virtue, must be sent to ecclesiastical universities or
faculties by their diocesan Bishops or the Superiors of their institutes.
Can. 820 Moderators and professors
of ecclesiastical universities and faculties are to ensure that the various
faculties of the university cooperate with each other, to the extent that their
aims permit. They are also to ensure that between their own university or
faculty and other universities and faculties, even non‑ecclesiastical
ones, there be a mutual cooperation in which, through conferences, coordinated
scientific research and other means, they work together for the greater
increase of scientific knowledge.
Can. 821 Where it is possible, the
Episcopal Conference and the diocesan Bishop are to provide for the
establishment of institutes for higher religious studies, in which are taught
theological and other subjects pertaining to Christian culture.
Can. 822 §1 In exercising their office
the pastors of the Church, availing themselves of a right which belongs to the
Church, are to make an ample use of the means of social communication.
§2 Pastors are also to teach the faithful that they
have the duty of working together so that the use of the means of social
communication may be imbued with a human and Christian spirit.
§3 All Christ’s faithful, especially those who in any
way take part in the management or use of the media, are to be diligent in
assisting pastoral action, so that the Church can more effectively exercise its
office through these means.
Can. 823 §1 In order to safeguard the
integrity of faith and morals, pastors of the Church have the duty and the
right to ensure that in writings or in the use of the means of social
communication there should be no ill effect on the faith and morals of Christ’s
faithful. They also have the duty and the right to demand that where writings
of the faithful touch upon matters of faith and morals, these be submitted to
their judgement. Moreover, they have the duty and the right to condemn writings
which harm true faith or good morals.
§2 For Christ’s faithful entrusted to their care, the
duty and the right mentioned in §1 belong to the Bishops, both as individuals
and in particular councils or Episcopal Conferences; for the whole people of
God, they belong to the supreme authority in the Church.
Can. 824 §1 Unless it is otherwise
provided, the local Ordinary whose permission or approval for publishing a book
is to be sought according to the canons of this title, is the author’s proper
local Ordinary, or the Ordinary of the place in which the book is published.
§2 Unless the contrary is clear, what is said in the
canons of this title about books, applies also to any writings intended for
publication.
Can. 825 §1 Books of the sacred
Scriptures may not be published unless they are approved by the Apostolic See
or the Episcopal Conference. The publication of translations of the sacred
Scriptures requires the approval of the same authority, and they must have
necessary and sufficient explanatory notes.
§2 With the permission of the Episcopal Conference, Catholic
members of Christ’s faithful, in cooperation with separated brethren, may
prepare and publish versions of the Scriptures, with appropriate explanatory
notes.
Can. 826 §1 For liturgical books, the
provisions of can. 838 are to be observed.
§2 To republish liturgical books or to publish
translations of all or part of them, it must be established, by an attestation
of the Ordinary of the place in which they are published, that they accord with
an approved edition.
[On the criteria to be followed in translating liturgical texts, see Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Instruction Liturgiam authenticam, 28.III.2001, and the changes introduced to can. 838 §§2-3 by the m.p. Magnum principium, 3.IX.2017]
§3 Prayer books, for either the public or the private
use of the faithful, are not to be published except by permission of the local
Ordinary.
Can. 827 §1 Without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 775 §2, the publication of catechisms and other writings
pertaining to catechetical formation, as well as their translations, requires
the approval of the local Ordinary.
§2 Books dealing with matters concerning sacred
Scripture, theology, canon law, church history, or religious or moral subjects
may not be used as textbooks on which the instruction is based, in elementary,
intermediate or higher schools, unless they were published with the approbation
of the competent ecclesiastical authority or were subsequently approved by that
authority.
§3 It is recommended that books dealing with the
subjects mentioned in §2, even though not used as basic textbooks, and any
writings which specially concern religion or good morals, be submitted to the
judgement of the local Ordinary.
§4 Books or other written material dealing with
religion or morals may not be displayed, sold or given away in churches or
oratories, unless they were published with the permission of the competent
ecclesiastical authority or were subsequently approved by that authority.
Can. 828 Collections of decrees or
acts published by any ecclesiastical authority may not be republished without
first seeking the permission of the same authority and observing the conditions
which it lays down.
Can. 829 Approval or permission to
publish a work is valid only for the first edition, but not for new editions or
translations.
Can. 830 §1 Every local Ordinary
retains the right to appoint persons whom he considers competent to give a
judgement about books. The Episcopal Conference, however, may draw up a list of
censors who are outstanding for their knowledge, right doctrine and prudence,
to be available to diocesan curias; it may even
establish a commission of censors whom the local Ordinary can consult.
§2 In carrying out this task, a censor must put aside
all preference of persons and look only to the teaching of the Church
concerning faith and morals, as declared by its magisterium.
§3 The censor must give an opinion in writing. If it is favourable, the Ordinary may, in his prudent judgement, give his permission for the work to be published, adding his own name and the date and place of the permission. If he does not give this permission, the Ordinary must inform the author of the reasons for the refusal.
[According to an Authentic
Interpretation of canon 830 §3, 20.VI.1987, the permission is to be printed
in published books, indicating the name of the one giving the permission, and
the date and place of the granting of the permission]
Can. 831 §1 Unless there is a just and
reasonable cause, no member of Christ’s faithful may write in newspapers,
pamphlets or periodicals which clearly are accustomed to attack the Catholic
religion or good morals. Clerics and members of religious institutes may write
in them only with the permission of the local Ordinary.
§2 It is for the Episcopal Conference to lay down
norms determining the requirements for clerics and members of religious
institutes to take part in radio and television programmes which concern Catholic
doctrine or morals.
Can. 832 To publish writings on
matters of religion or morals, members of religious institutes require also the
permission of their major Superior, in accordance with the constitutions.
Can. 833 The following are
personally bound to make a profession of faith, according to the formula
approved by the Apostolic See:
1° in the presence of the president or his delegate:
all who, with a deliberative or a consultative vote, take part in an Ecumenical
Council, a particular council, the synod of Bishops, or a diocesan synod; in
the presence of the council or synod: the president himself;
2° in accordance with the statutes of the sacred
College: those promoted to the dignity of Cardinal;
3° in the presence of a delegate of the Apostolic See:
all who are promoted to the episcopate, and all those who are equivalent to a
diocesan Bishop;
4° in the presence of the college of consultors: the
diocesan Administrator;
5° in the presence of the diocesan Bishop or his
delegate: Vicars general, episcopal Vicars and judicial Vicars;
6° in the presence of the local Ordinary or his
delegate: parish priests; the rector, professors of theology and philosophy in
seminaries, at the beginning of their term of office; and those who are to be
promoted to the order of diaconate;
7° in the presence of the Chancellor or, in the
absence of the Chancellor, the local Ordinary, or the delegates of either: the
rector of an ecclesiastical or Catholic university, at the beginning of the
term of office; in the presence of the rector if he is a priest, or of the
local Ordinary or the delegates of either: those who in any universities teach
subjects which deal with faith or morals, at the beginning of their term of
office;
8° in accordance with the constitutions: Superiors in
religious institutes and clerical societies of apostolic life.
Can. 834 §1 The Church carries out its
office of sanctifying in a special way in the sacred liturgy, which is an
exercise of the priestly office of Jesus Christ. In the liturgy, by the use of
signs perceptible to the senses, our sanctification is symbolised and, in a
manner appropriate to each sign, is brought about. Through the liturgy a
complete public worship is offered to God by the head and members of the
mystical body of Christ.
§2 This worship takes place when it is offered in the
name of the Church, by persons lawfully deputed and through actions approved by
ecclesiastical authority.
Can. 835 §1 The sanctifying office is
exercised principally by Bishops, who are the high priests, the principal
dispensers of the mysteries of God and the moderators, promoters and guardians
of the entire liturgical life in the Churches entrusted to their care.
§2 This office is also exercised by priests. They,
too, share in the priesthood of Christ and, as his ministers under the
authority of the Bishop, are consecrated to celebrate divine worship and to
sanctify the people.
§3 Deacons have a share in the celebration of divine
worship in accordance with the provisions of law.
§4 The other members of Christ’s faithful have their
own part in this sanctifying office, each in his or her own way actively
sharing in liturgical celebrations, particularly in the Eucharist. Parents have
a special share in this office when they live their married lives in a Christian
spirit and provide for the Christian education of their children.
Can. 836 Since Christian worship, in
which the common priesthood of Christ’s faithful is exercised, must proceed
from and rest upon faith, sacred ministers are to strive diligently to arouse
and enlighten this faith, especially by the ministry of the word by which faith
is born and nourished.
Can. 837 §1 Liturgical actions are not
private but are celebrations of the Church itself as the ‘sacrament of unity’,
that is, the holy people united and ordered under the Bishops. Accordingly,
they concern the whole body of the Church, making it known and influencing it.
They affect individual members of the Church in ways that vary according to
orders, role and actual participation.
§2 Since liturgical matters by their very nature call
for a community celebration, they are, as far as possible, to be celebrated in
the presence of Christ’s faithful and with their active participation.
Can. 838 §1 The ordering and guidance
of the sacred liturgy depends solely upon the authority of the Church, namely,
that of the Apostolic See and, as provided by law, that of the diocesan Bishop.
§2 It is for the Apostolic See to order the sacred liturgy of the universal Church, publish liturgical books, recognise adaptations approved by the Episcopal Conference according to the norm of law, and exercise vigilance that liturgical regulations are observed faithfully everywhere.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Magnum principium, 3.IX.2017]
§3 It pertains to the Episcopal Conferences to faithfully prepare versions of the liturgical books in vernacular languages, suitable accommodated within defined limits, and to approve and publish the liturgical books for the regions for which they are responsible after the confirmation of the Apostolic See.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Magnum principium, 3.IX.2017]
§4 Within the limits of his competence, it belongs to
the diocesan Bishop to lay down for the Church entrusted to his care,
liturgical regulations which are binding on all.
Can. 839 §1 The Church carries out its
sanctifying office by other means also, that is by prayer, in which it asks God
to make Christ’s faithful holy in the truth, and by works of penance and
charity, which play a large part in establishing and strengthening in souls the
Kingdom of Christ, and so contribute to the salvation of the world.
§2 Local Ordinaries are to ensure that the prayers and
the pious and sacred practices of the Christian people are in full harmony with
the laws of the Church.
Can. 840 The sacraments of the New
Testament were instituted by Christ the Lord and entrusted to the Church. As
actions of Christ and of the Church, they are signs and means by which faith is
expressed and strengthened, worship is offered to God and our sanctification is
brought about. Thus they contribute in the most effective manner to
establishing, strengthening and manifesting ecclesiastical communion.
Accordingly, in the celebration of the sacraments both the sacred ministers and
all the other members of Christ’s faithful must show great reverence and due
care.
Can. 841 Since the sacraments are
the same throughout the universal Church, and belong to the divine deposit of
faith, only the supreme authority in the Church can approve or define what is
needed for their validity. It belongs to the same authority, or to another
competent authority in accordance with can. 838 §§3 and 4, to determine what is
required for their lawful celebration, administration and reception and for the
order to be observed in their celebration.
Can. 842 §1 A person who has not
received baptism cannot validly be admitted to the other sacraments.
§2 The sacraments of baptism, confirmation and the
blessed Eucharist so complement one another that all three are required for
full Christian initiation.
Can. 843 §1 Sacred ministers may not
deny the sacraments to those who opportunely ask for them, are properly
disposed and are not prohibited by law from receiving them.
§2 According to their respective offices in the
Church, both pastors of souls and all other members of Christ’s faithful have a
duty to ensure that those who ask for the sacraments are prepared for their
reception. This should be done through proper evangelisation and catechetical
instruction, in accordance with the norms laid down by the competent authority.
Can. 844 §1 Catholic ministers may
lawfully administer the sacraments only to Catholic members of Christ’s
faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from Catholic ministers,
except as provided in §§2, 3 and 4 of this canon and in can. 861 §2.
§2 Whenever necessity requires or a genuine spiritual
advantage commends it, and provided the danger of error or indifferentism is
avoided, Christ’s faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to
approach a Catholic minister, may lawfully receive the sacraments of penance,
the Eucharist and anointing of the sick from non‑Catholic ministers in
whose Churches these sacraments are valid.
§3 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the
sacraments of penance, the Eucharist and anointing of the sick to members of
the eastern Churches not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they
spontaneously ask for them and are properly disposed. The same applies to
members of other Churches which the Apostolic See judges to be in the same
position as the aforesaid eastern Churches so far as the sacraments are
concerned.
§4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the
judgement of the diocesan Bishop or of the Episcopal Conference, there is some
other grave and pressing need, Catholic ministers may lawfully administer these
same sacraments to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic
Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who
spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the Catholic faith
in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed.
§5 In respect of the cases dealt with in §§2, 3 and 4,
the diocesan Bishop or the Episcopal Conference is not to issue general norms
except after consultation with the competent authority, at least at the local
level, of the non‑Catholic Church or community concerned.
Can. 845 §1 Because they imprint a
character, the sacraments of baptism, confirmation and order cannot be
repeated.
§2 If after diligent enquiry a prudent doubt remains
as to whether the sacraments mentioned in §1 have been conferred at all, or
conferred validly, they are to be conferred conditionally.
Can. 846 §1 The liturgical books,
approved by the competent authority, are to be faithfully followed in the
celebration of the sacraments. Accordingly, no one may on a personal initiative
add to or omit or alter anything in those books.
§2 The ministers are to celebrate the sacraments
according to their own rite.
Can. 847 §1 In administering sacraments
in which holy oils are to be used, the minister must use oil made from olives
or other plants, which, except as provided in can. 999, n. 2, has recently been
consecrated or blessed by a Bishop. Older oil is not to be used except in a
case of necessity.
§2 The parish priest is to obtain the holy oils from
his own Bishop and keep them carefully in fitting custody.
Can. 848 For the administration of
the sacraments the minister may not ask for anything beyond the offerings which
are determined by the competent authority, and he must always ensure that the
needy are not deprived of the help of the sacraments by reason of poverty.
Can. 849 Baptism, the
gateway to the sacraments, is necessary for salvation, either by actual
reception or at least by desire. By it people are
freed from sins, are born again as children of God and, made like to Christ by
an indelible character, are incorporated into the Church. It is validly
conferred only by a washing in real water with the proper form of words.
[On the relationship between faith and the sacrament of baptism see International Theological Commission, The Reciprocity between Faith and Sacraments in the Sacramental Economy (2020), nos. 81-94]
Can. 850 Baptism is administered
according to the rite prescribed in the approved liturgical books, except in a
case of urgent necessity when only those elements which are required for the
validity of the sacrament must be observed.
[Baptism conferred by the Mormons (“The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-Day Saints”) is invalid: since the Father, the Son, and the
Holy Spirit are, for them, something essentially different from what the Church
professes, the baptism administered by them – although conferred with the same
Trinitarian formula – is vitiated by an error in
fide that redounds to the intention of the
minister: see Dicastery
for the Doctrine of the Faith, Note Gestis verbisque, 25.I.2024, footnote 39; Response
of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 5.VI.2004]
[A Response of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 6.VIII.2020 establishes the invalidity of baptism conferred in the plural form (“We baptise you…”) and the need to administer it in forma absoluta to those who may have received it that way]
Can. 851 The celebration of baptism
should be properly prepared. Accordingly:
1° an adult who intends to receive baptism is to be
admitted to the catechumenate and, as far as possible, brought through the
various stages to sacramental initiation, in accordance with the rite of
initiation as adapted by the Episcopal Conference and with the particular norms
issued by it;
2° the parents of a child who is to be baptised, and
those who are to undertake the office of sponsors, are to be suitably
instructed on the meaning of this sacrament and the obligations attaching to
it. The parish priest is to see to it that either he or others duly prepare the
parents, by means of pastoral advice and indeed by prayer together; a number of
families might be brought together for this purpose and, where possible, each
family visited.
Can. 852 §1 The provisions of the
canons on adult baptism apply to all those who, being no longer infants, have
reached the use of reason.
§2 One who is incapable of personal responsibility is
regarded as an infant even in regard to baptism.
Can. 853 Apart from a case of
necessity, the water to be used in conferring baptism is to be blessed, in
accordance with the provisions of the liturgical books.
Can. 854 Baptism is to be conferred
either by immersion or by pouring, in accordance with the provisions of the
Episcopal Conference.
Can. 855 Parents, sponsors and
parish priests are to take care that a name is not given which is foreign to Christian
sentiment.
Can. 856 Though baptism may be
celebrated on any day, it is recommended that normally it be celebrated on a
Sunday or, if possible, on the vigil of Easter.
Can. 857 §1 Apart from a case of
necessity, the proper place for baptism is a church or an oratory.
§2 As a rule and unless a just reason suggests
otherwise, an adult is to be baptised in his or her proper parish church, and
an infant in the proper parish church of the parents.
Can. 858 §1 Each parish church is to
have a baptismal font, without prejudice to the same right already acquired by
other churches.
§2 The local Ordinary, after consultation with the
local parish priest, may for the convenience of the faithful permit or order
that a baptismal font be placed also in another church or oratory within the
parish.
Can. 859 If, because of distance or
other circumstances, the person to be baptised cannot without grave
inconvenience go or be brought to the parish church or the oratory mentioned in
can. 858 §2, baptism may and must be conferred in some other church or oratory
which is nearer, or even in some other fitting place.
Can. 860 §1 Apart from a case of
necessity, baptism is not to be conferred in private houses, unless the local
Ordinary should for a grave reason permit it.
§2 Unless the diocesan Bishop has decreed otherwise,
baptism is not to be conferred in hospital, except in a case of necessity or
for some other pressing pastoral reason.
Can. 861 §1 The ordinary minister of
baptism is a Bishop, a priest or a deacon, without prejudice to the provision
of can. 530, n. 1.
§2 If the ordinary minister is absent or impeded, a
catechist or some other person deputed to this office by the local Ordinary,
may lawfully confer baptism; indeed, in a case of necessity, any person who has
the requisite intention may do so. Pastors of souls, especially parish priests,
are to be diligent in ensuring that Christ’s faithful are taught the correct
way to baptise.
Can. 862 Except in a case of
necessity, it is unlawful for anyone without due permission to confer baptism
outside his own territory, not even upon his own subjects.
Can. 863 The baptism of adults, at
least of those who have completed their fourteenth year, is to be referred to
the Bishop, so that he himself may confer it if he judges this appropriate.
Can. 864 Every unbaptised person,
and only such a person, can be baptised.
Can. 865 §1 To be admitted to baptism,
an adult must have manifested the intention to receive baptism, must be
adequately instructed in the truths of the faith and in the duties of a Christian,
and tested in the Christian life over the course of the catechumenate. The
person must moreover be urged to have sorrow for personal sins.
§2 An adult in danger of death may be baptised if,
with some knowledge of the principal truths of the faith, he or she has in some
manner manifested the intention to receive baptism and promises to observe the
requirements of the Christian religion.
Can. 866 Unless there is a grave
reason to the contrary, immediately after receiving baptism an adult is to be
confirmed, to participate in the celebration of the Eucharist and to receive
holy communion.
Can. 867 §1 Parents are obliged to see
that their infants are baptised within the first few weeks. As soon as possible
after the birth, indeed even before it, they are to approach the parish priest
to ask for the sacrament for their child, and to be themselves duly prepared
for it.
§2 If the infant is in danger of death, it is to be
baptised without any delay.
Can. 868 §1 For an infant to be
baptised lawfully it is required:
1° that the parents, or at least one of them, or the
person who lawfully holds their place, give their consent;
2° there must be a founded hope that the infant will be brought up in the Catholic religion subject to §3; if such hope is altogether lacking, the baptism is to be delayed according to the prescripts of particular law after the parents have been informed of the reason.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
§2 An infant of Catholic parents, indeed even of non‑Catholic
parents, may in danger of death be baptised even if the parents are opposed to
it.
§3 Infants of non-Catholic Christians are licitly baptized if their parents or at least one of them or the person who legitimately takes their place request it and if it is physically or morally impossible for them to approach their own minister.
[New paragraph added by m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
Can. 869 §1 If there is doubt as to
whether a person was baptised or whether a baptism was conferred validly, and
after serious enquiry this doubt persists, the person is to be baptised
conditionally.
§2 Those baptised in a non‑Catholic ecclesial
community are not to be baptised conditionally unless there is a serious reason
for doubting the validity of their baptism, on the ground of the matter or the
form of words used in the baptism, or of the intention of the adult being
baptised or of that of the baptising minister.
§3 If in the cases mentioned in §§1 and 2 a doubt
remains about the conferring of the baptism or its validity, baptism is not to
be conferred until the doctrine of the sacrament of baptism is explained to the
person to be baptised, if that person is an adult. Moreover, the reasons for
doubting the validity of the earlier baptism should be given to the person or,
where an infant is concerned, to the parents.
Can. 870 An abandoned infant or a
foundling is to be baptised unless diligent enquiry establishes that it has
already been baptised.
Can. 871 Aborted foetuses, if they
are alive, are to be baptised, in so far as this is possible.
Can. 872 In so far as possible, a
person being baptised is to be assigned a sponsor. In the case of an adult
baptism, the sponsor’s role is to assist the person in Christian initiation. In
the case of an infant baptism, the role is together with the parents to present
the child for baptism, and to help it to live a Christian life befitting the
baptised and faithfully to fulfil the duties inherent in baptism.
Can. 873 One sponsor, male or
female, is sufficient; but there may be two, one of each sex.
Can. 874 §1 To be admitted to undertake
the office of sponsor, a person must:
1° be appointed by the candidate for baptism, or by
the parents or whoever stands in their place, or failing these, by the parish
priest or the minister; to be appointed the person must be suitable for this
role and have the intention of fulfilling it;
2° be not less than sixteen years of age, unless a
different age has been stipulated by the diocesan Bishop, or unless the parish
priest or the minister considers that there is a just reason for an exception
to be made;
3° be a Catholic
who has been confirmed and has received the blessed Eucharist, and who lives a
life of faith which befits the role to be undertaken;
[On whether a homosexual who is cohabiting may be a godparent see Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Answers to several questions, 31.X.2023, no. 5]
4° not labour under a canonical penalty, whether
imposed or declared;
5° not be either the father or the mother of the
person to be baptised.
§2 A baptised person who belongs to a non‑Catholic ecclesial community may be admitted only in company with a Catholic sponsor, and then simply as a witness to the baptism.
[See the 1993 Directory for Promoting Christian Unity,
no. 98 b), allowing an Orthodox godparent if there is a just cause]
Can. 875 Whoever administers baptism
is to take care that if there is not a sponsor present, there is at least one
witness who can prove that the baptism was conferred.
Can. 876 To prove that baptism has
been conferred, if there is no conflict of interest, it is sufficient to have
either one unexceptionable witness or, if the baptism was conferred upon an
adult, the sworn testimony of the baptised person.
Can. 877 §1 The parish priest of the
place in which the baptism was conferred must carefully and without delay
record in the register of baptism the names of the baptised, the minister, the
parents, the sponsors and, if there were such, the witnesses, and the place and
date of baptism. He must also enter the date and place of birth.
§2 In the case of a child of an unmarried mother, the
mother’s name is to be entered if her maternity is publicly known or if, either
in writing or before two witnesses, she freely asks that this be done.
Similarly, the name of the father is to be entered, if his paternity is
established either by some public document or by his own declaration in the
presence of the parish priest and two witnesses. In all other cases, the name
of the baptised person is to be registered, without any indication of the name of
the father or of the parents.
§3 In the case of an adopted child, the names of the
adopting parents are to be registered and, at least if this is done in the
local civil registration, the names of the natural parents in accordance with
§§1 and 2 subject however to the rulings of the Episcopal Conference.
Can. 878 If baptism was administered
neither by the parish priest nor in his presence, the minister of baptism,
whoever that was, must notify the parish priest of the parish in which the
baptism was administered, so that he may register the baptism in accordance
with can. 877 §1.
Can. 879 The sacrament of
confirmation confers a character. By it the baptised continue their path of Christian
initiation. They are enriched with the gift of the Holy Spirit, and are more
closely linked to the Church. They are made strong and more firmly obliged by
word and deed to witness to Christ and to spread and defend the faith.
[On the relationship between faith and the sacrament of confirmation see International Theological Commission, The Reciprocity between Faith and Sacraments in the Sacramental Economy (2020), nos. 95-101]
Can. 880 §1 The sacrament of
confirmation is conferred by anointing with chrism on the forehead in a laying
on of hands, and by the words prescribed in the approved liturgical books.
§2 The chrism to be used in the sacrament of
confirmation must have been consecrated by a Bishop, even when the sacrament is
administered by a priest.
Can. 881 It is desirable that the
sacrament of confirmation be celebrated in a church and indeed during Mass.
However, for a just and reasonable cause it may be celebrated apart from Mass
and in any fitting place.
Can. 882 The ordinary minister of
confirmation is a Bishop. A priest can also validly confer this sacrament if he
has the faculty to do so, either from the general law or by way of a special
grant from the competent authority.
Can. 883 The following have, by law,
the faculty to administer confirmation:
1° within the confines of their jurisdiction, those
who in law are equivalent to a diocesan Bishop;
2° in respect of the person to be confirmed, the
priest who by virtue of his office or by mandate of the diocesan Bishop
baptises an adult or admits a baptised adult into full communion with the Catholic
Church;
3° in respect of those in danger of death, the parish
priest or indeed any priest.
Can. 884 §1 The diocesan Bishop is
himself to administer confirmation or to ensure that it is administered by
another Bishop. If necessity so requires, he may grant to one or several
specified priests the faculty to administer this sacrament.
§2 For a grave reason the Bishop, or the priest who by
law or by special grant of the competent authority has the faculty to confirm,
may in individual cases invite other priests to join with him in administering
the sacrament.
Can. 885 §1 The diocesan Bishop is
bound to ensure that the sacrament of confirmation is conferred upon his
subjects who duly and reasonably request it.
§2 A priest who has this faculty must use it for those
in whose favour it was granted.
Can. 886 §1 A Bishop in his own diocese
may lawfully administer the sacrament of confirmation even to the faithful who
are not his subjects, unless there is an express prohibition by their own
Ordinary.
§2 In order lawfully to administer confirmation in
another diocese, unless it be to his own subjects, a Bishop needs the
permission, at least reasonably presumed, of the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 887 A priest who has the
faculty to administer confirmation may, within the territory assigned to him,
lawfully administer this sacrament even to those from outside the territory,
unless there is a prohibition by their own Ordinary. He cannot, however, validly
confirm anyone in another territory, without prejudice to the provision of can.
883, n. 3.
Can. 888 Within the territory in
which they can confer confirmation, ministers may confirm even in exempt
places.
Can. 889 §1 Every baptised person who
is not confirmed, and only such a person, is capable of receiving confirmation.
§2 Apart from the danger of death, to receive
confirmation lawfully a person who has the use of reason must be suitably
instructed, properly disposed and able to renew the baptismal promises.
Can. 890 The faithful are bound to
receive this sacrament at the proper time. Parents and pastors of souls,
especially parish priests, are to see that the faithful are properly instructed
to receive the sacrament and come to it at the opportune time.
Can. 891 The sacrament of
confirmation is to be conferred on the faithful at about the age of discretion,
unless the Episcopal Conference has decided on a different age, or there is a
danger of death or, in the judgement of the minister, a grave reason suggests otherwise.
Can. 892 As far as possible the
person to be confirmed is to have a sponsor. The sponsor’s function is to take
care that the person confirmed behaves as a true witness of Christ and
faithfully fulfils the duties inherent in this sacrament.
Can. 893 §1 A person who would
undertake the office of sponsor must fulfil the conditions mentioned in can.
874.
§2 It is desirable that the sponsor chosen be the one
who undertook this role at baptism.
Can. 894 To establish that
confirmation has been conferred, the provisions of can. 876 are to be observed.
Can. 895 The names of those
confirmed, the minister, the parents, the sponsors and the place and date of
the confirmation are to be recorded in the confirmation register of the
diocesan curia or, wherever this has been prescribed by the Episcopal
Conference or by the diocesan Bishop, in the register to be kept in the
parochial archive. The parish priest must notify the parish priest of the place
of the baptism that the confirmation was conferred, so that it be recorded in
the baptismal register, in accordance with can. 535 §2.
Can. 896 If the parish priest of the
place was not present, the minister, personally or through someone else, is to
notify him as soon as possible that the confirmation was conferred.
Can. 897 The most
venerable sacrament is the blessed Eucharist, in which Christ the Lord himself
is contained, offered and received, and by which the Church continually lives
and grows. The Eucharistic Sacrifice, the memorial of the death and
resurrection of the Lord, in which the Sacrifice of the cross is forever
perpetuated, is the summit and the source of all worship and Christian life. By
means of it the unity of God’s people is signified and brought about, and the
building up of the body of Christ is perfected. The other sacraments and all
the apostolic works of Christ are bound up with, and directed to, the blessed Eucharist.
[On the relationship between faith and the sacrament of the Eucharist see International Theological Commission, The Reciprocity between Faith and Sacraments in the Sacramental Economy (2020), nos. 102-131]
Can. 898 Christ’s faithful are to
hold the blessed Eucharist in the highest honour. They should take an active
part in the celebration of the most august Sacrifice of the Mass; they should
receive the sacrament with great devotion and frequently, and should reverence
it with the greatest adoration. In explaining the doctrine of this sacrament,
pastors of souls are assiduously to instruct the faithful about their
obligation in this regard.
Can. 899 §1 The celebration of the Eucharist
is an action of Christ himself and of the Church. In it Christ the Lord,
through the ministry of the priest, offers himself, substantially present under
the appearances of bread and wine, to God the Father, and gives himself as
spiritual nourishment to the faithful who are associated with him in his
offering.
§2 In the Eucharistic
assembly the people of God are called together under the presidency of the
Bishop or of a priest authorised by him, who acts in the person of Christ. All
the faithful present, whether clerics or lay people, unite to participate in
their own way, according to their various orders and liturgical roles.
[On the meaning of “in the person of Christ” see Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Note Gestis verbisque, 25.I.2024, no. 24]
§3 The Eucharistic celebration is to be so ordered
that all the participants derive from it the many fruits for which Christ the
Lord instituted the Eucharistic Sacrifice.
Article 1: The Minister of the Blessed Eucharist
Can. 900 §1 The only minister who, in
the person of Christ, can bring into being the sacrament of the Eucharist, is a
validly ordained priest.
§2 Any priest who is not debarred by canon law may
lawfully celebrate the Eucharist, provided the provisions of the following
canons are observed.
Can. 901 A priest is entitled to
offer Mass for anyone, living or dead.
Can. 902 Unless the benefit of
Christ’s faithful requires or suggests otherwise, priests may concelebrate the Eucharist;
they are, however, fully entitled to celebrate the Eucharist individually, but
not while a celebration is taking place in the same church or oratory.
Can. 903 A priest is to be permitted
to celebrate the Eucharist, even if he is not known to the rector of the
church, provided either that he presents commendatory letters, not more than a
year old, from his own Ordinary or Superior, or that it can be prudently judged
that he is not debarred from celebrating.
Can. 904 Remembering always that in
the mystery of the Eucharistic Sacrifice the work of redemption is continually
being carried out, priests are to celebrate frequently. Indeed, daily
celebration is earnestly recommended, because, even if it should not be
possible to have the faithful present, it is an action of Christ and of the
Church in which priests fulfil their principal role.
Can. 905 §1 Apart from those cases in
which the law allows him to celebrate or concelebrate the Eucharist a number of
times on the same day, a priest may not celebrate more than once a day.
§2 If there is a scarcity of priests, the local
Ordinary may for a good reason allow priests to celebrate twice in one day or
even, if pastoral need requires it, three times on Sundays or holydays of
obligation.
Can. 906 A priest may not celebrate
the Eucharistic Sacrifice without the participation of at least one of the
faithful, unless there is a good and reasonable cause for doing so.
Can. 907 In the celebration of the Eucharist,
deacons and lay persons are not permitted to say the prayers, especially the Eucharistic
prayer, nor to perform the actions which are proper to the celebrating priest.
Can. 908 Catholic priests are
forbidden to concelebrate the Eucharist with priests or ministers of Churches
or ecclesial communities which are not in full communion with the Catholic
Church.
Can. 909 A priest is not to omit
dutifully to prepare himself by prayer before the celebration of the Eucharist,
nor afterwards to omit to make thanksgiving to God.
Can. 910 §1 The ordinary minister of
holy communion is a Bishop, a priest or a deacon.
§2 The extraordinary minister of holy communion is an acolyte, or another of Christ’s faithful deputed in accordance with can. 230 §3.
[Extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion may not exercise their
function if ordinary ministers are present and are not impeded: see Authentic
Interpretation of canon 910 §2, 1.VI.1988]
Can. 911 §1 The duty and right to bring
the blessed Eucharist to the sick as Viaticum belongs to the parish priest, to
assistant priests, to chaplains and, in respect of all who are in the house, to
the community Superior in clerical religious institutes or societies of
apostolic life.
§2 In a case of necessity, or with the permission at
least presumed of the parish priest, chaplain or Superior, who must
subsequently be notified, any priest or other minister of holy communion must
do this.
Article 2: Participation in the Blessed Eucharist
Can. 912 Any baptised person who is
not forbidden by law may and must be admitted to holy communion.
Can. 913 §1 For holy communion to be
administered to children, it is required that they have sufficient knowledge
and be accurately prepared, so that according to their capacity they understand
what the mystery of Christ means, and are able to receive the Body of the Lord
with faith and devotion.
§2 The blessed Eucharist may, however, be administered
to children in danger of death if they can distinguish the Body of Christ from
ordinary food and receive communion with reverence.
Can. 914 It is primarily the duty of
parents and of those who take their place, as it is the duty of the parish
priest, to ensure that children who have reached the use of reason are properly
prepared and, having made their sacramental confession, are nourished by this
divine food as soon as possible. It is also the duty of the parish priest to
see that children who have not reached the use of reason, or whom he has judged
to be insufficiently disposed, do not come to holy communion.
Can. 915 Those upon whom the penalty
of excommunication or interdict has been imposed or declared, and others who
obstinately persist in manifest grave sin, are not to be admitted to holy
communion.
Can. 916 Anyone who is conscious of
grave sin may not celebrate Mass or receive the Body of the Lord without
previously having been to sacramental confession, unless there is a grave
reason and there is no opportunity to confess; in this case the person is to remember
the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition, which includes the resolve
to go to confession as soon as possible.
Can. 917 One who has received the blessed Eucharist may receive it again on the same day only within a Eucharistic celebration in which that person participates, without prejudice to the provision of can. 921 §2.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 917, 11.VII.1984, states that one who has already
received the Eucharist may receive it only once more on the same day]
Can. 918 It is most strongly
recommended that the faithful receive holy communion in the course of a Eucharistic
celebration. If, however, for good reason they ask for it apart from the Mass,
it is to be administered to them, observing the liturgical rites.
Can. 919 §1 Whoever is to receive the
blessed Eucharist is to abstain for at least one hour before holy communion
from all food and drink, with the sole exception of water and medicine.
§2 A priest who, on the same day, celebrates the
blessed Eucharist twice or three times may consume something before the second
or third celebration, even though there is not an hour’s interval.
§3 The elderly and those who are suffering from some
illness, as well as those who care for them, may receive the blessed Eucharist
even if within the preceding hour they have consumed something.
Can. 920 §1 Once admitted to the
blessed Eucharist, each of the faithful is obliged to receive holy communion at
least once a year.
§2 This precept must be fulfilled during paschal time,
unless for a good reason it is fulfilled at another time during the year.
Can. 921 §1 Christ’s faithful who are
in danger of death, from whatever cause, are to be strengthened by holy
communion as Viaticum.
§2 Even if they have already received holy communion
that same day, it is nevertheless strongly suggested that in danger of death
they should communicate again.
§3 While the danger of death persists, it is
recommended that holy communion be administered a number of times, but on
separate days.
Can. 922 Holy Viaticum for the sick
is not to be unduly delayed. Those who have the care of souls are to take
assiduous care that the sick are strengthened by it while they are in full
possession of their faculties.
Can. 923 Christ’s faithful may
participate in the Eucharistic Sacrifice and receive holy communion in any Catholic
rite, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 844.
Article 3: The Rites and Ceremonies of the Eucharistic Celebration
Can. 924 §1 The most holy Sacrifice of
the Eucharist must be celebrated in bread, and in wine to which a small
quantity of water is to be added.
§2 The bread must be wheaten only, and recently made,
so that there is no danger of corruption.
§3 The wine must be natural, made from grapes of the
vine, and not corrupt.
[See Congregation for Divine Worship and the
Discipline of the Sacraments, Circular
letter to Bishops, 15.VI.2017, for guidance on ensuring the genuineness of
the Eucharist matter]
Can. 925 Holy communion is to be
given under the species of bread alone or, in accordance with the liturgical
laws, under both species or, in case of necessity, even under the species of
wine alone.
Can. 926 In the Eucharistic
celebration, in accordance with the ancient tradition of the Latin Church, the
priest is to use unleavened bread wherever he celebrates Mass.
Can. 927 It is absolutely wrong,
even in urgent and extreme necessity, to consecrate one element without the
other, or even to consecrate both outside the Eucharistic celebration.
Can. 928 The Eucharistic celebration
is to be carried out either in the Latin language or in another language,
provided the liturgical texts have been lawfully approved.
Can. 929 In celebrating and
administering the Eucharist, priests and deacons are to wear the sacred
vestments prescribed by the rubrics.
Can. 930 §1 A priest who is ill or
elderly, if he is unable to stand, may celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice
sitting but otherwise observing the liturgical laws; he may not, however, do so
in public except by permission of the local Ordinary.
§2 A priest who is blind or suffering from some other
infirmity, may lawfully celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice by using the text
of any approved Mass, with the assistance, if need be, of another priest or
deacon or even a properly instructed lay person.
Article 4: The Time and Place of the Eucharistic Celebration
Can. 931 The celebration and
distribution of the Eucharist may take place on any day and at any hour, except
those which are excluded by the liturgical laws.
Can. 932 §1 The Eucharistic celebration
is to be carried out in a sacred place, unless in a particular case necessity
requires otherwise; in which case the celebration must be in a fitting place.
§2 The Eucharistic Sacrifice must be carried out at an
altar that is dedicated or blessed. Outside a sacred place an appropriate table
may be used, but always with an altar cloth and a corporal.
Can. 933 For a good reason, with the
express permission of the local Ordinary and provided scandal has been
eliminated, a priest may celebrate the Eucharist in a place of worship of any
Church or ecclesial community which is not in full communion with the Catholic
Church.
Can. 934 §1 The blessed Eucharist:
1° must be reserved in the cathedral church or its
equivalent, in every parish church, and in the church or oratory attached to
the house of a religious institute or society of apostolic life
2° may be reserved in a Bishop’s chapel and, by
permission of the local Ordinary, in other churches, oratories and chapels.
§2 In sacred places where the blessed Eucharist is
reserved there must always be someone who is responsible for it, and as far as
possible a priest is to celebrate Mass there at least twice a month.
Can. 935 It is not lawful for anyone
to keep the blessed Eucharist in personal custody or to carry it around, unless
there is an urgent pastoral need and the prescriptions of the diocesan Bishop
are observed.
Can. 936 In a house of a religious
institute or other house of piety, the blessed Eucharist is to be reserved only
in the church or principal oratory attached to the house. For a just reason,
however, the Ordinary can permit it to be reserved also in another oratory of
the same house.
Can. 937 Unless there is a grave
reason to the contrary, a church in which the blessed Eucharist is reserved is
to be open to the faithful for at least some hours every day, so that they can
pray before the blessed Sacrament.
Can. 938 §1 The blessed Eucharist is to
be reserved habitually in only one tabernacle of a church or oratory.
§2 The tabernacle in which the blessed Eucharist is
reserved should be sited in a distinguished place in the church or oratory, a
place which is conspicuous, suitably adorned and conducive to prayer.
§3 The tabernacle in which the blessed Eucharist is
habitually reserved is to be immovable, made of solid and non‑transparent
material, and so locked as to give the greatest security against any danger of
profanation.
§4 For a grave reason, especially at night, it is
permitted to reserve the blessed Eucharist in some other safer place, provided
it is fitting.
§5 The person in charge of a church or oratory is to
see to it that the key of the tabernacle in which the blessed Eucharist is
reserved, is in maximum safe keeping.
Can. 939 Consecrated hosts, in a
quantity sufficient for the needs of the faithful, are to be kept in a pyx or
ciborium, and are to be renewed frequently, the older hosts having been duly
consumed.
Can. 940 A special lamp is to burn
continuously before the tabernacle in which the blessed Eucharist is reserved,
to indicate and to honour the presence of Christ.
Can. 941 §1 In churches or oratories
which are allowed to reserve the blessed Eucharist, there may be exposition,
either with the pyx or with the monstrance, in accordance with the norms
prescribed in the liturgical books.
§2 Exposition of the blessed Sacrament may not take
place while Mass is being celebrated in the same area of the church or oratory.
Can. 942 It is recommended that in
these churches or oratories, there is to be each year a solemn exposition of
the blessed Sacrament for an appropriate, even if not for a continuous time, so
that the local community may more attentively meditate on and adore the Eucharistic
mystery. This exposition is to take place only if a fitting attendance of the
faithful is foreseen, and the prescribed norms are observed.
Can. 943 The minister of exposition
of the blessed Sacrament and of the Eucharistic blessing is a priest or deacon.
In special circumstances the minister of exposition and deposition alone, but
without the blessing, is an acolyte, and extraordinary minister of holy
communion, or another person deputed by the local Ordinary, in accordance with
the regulations of the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 944 §1 Wherever in the judgement
of the diocesan Bishop it can be done, a procession through the streets is to
be held, especially on the solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ, as a
public witness of veneration of the blessed Eucharist.
§2 It is for the diocesan Bishop to establish such
regulations about processions as will provide for participation in them and for
their being carried out in a dignified manner.
Can. 945 §1 In accordance with the
approved custom of the Church, any priest who celebrates or concelebrates a
Mass may accept an offering to apply the Mass for a specific intention.
§2 It is earnestly recommended to priests that, even
if they do not receive an offering, they celebrate Mass for the intentions of
Christ’s faithful, especially of those in need.
Can. 946 The faithful who make an
offering so that Mass can be celebrated for their intention, contribute to the
good of the Church, and by that offering they share in the Church’s concern for
the support of its ministers and its activities.
Can. 947 Even the semblance of
trafficking or trading is to be entirely excluded from Mass offerings.
Can. 948 Separate Masses must be applied for the intentions of those for whom an individual offering, even if small, has been made and accepted.
[The Congregation for the Clergy’s Decree Mos iugiter,
22.II.1991, forbids priests from combining offerings in a single celebration of
Mass without the knowledge of those making the offerings. Subject to certain
conditions such “collective” offerings are permitted where the donors have been
explicitly informed beforehand and have agreed]
Can. 949 One who is obliged to
celebrate and apply Mass for the intentions of those who made an offering, is
bound by this obligation even if the offering received is lost through no fault
of his.
Can. 950 If a sum of money is
offered for the application of Masses, but with no indication of the number of
Masses to be celebrated, their number is to be calculated on the basis of the
offering prescribed in the place where the donor resides, unless the donor’s
intention must lawfully be presumed to have been otherwise.
Can. 951 §1 A priest who celebrates a number of Masses on the same day may apply each Mass for the intention for which an offering was made, subject however to the rule that, apart from Christmas Day, he may retain for himself the offering for only one Mass; the others he is to transmit to purposes prescribed by the Ordinary, while allowing for some compensation on the ground of an extrinsic title.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 951 §1, 23.IV.1987, clarifies that the Ordinary
referred to in this canon is the proper Ordinary of the celebrant, not the
Ordinary of the place where the Mass is celebrated, except in the case of a
parish priest or assistant priest]
§2 A priest who on the same day concelebrates a second
Mass may not under any title accept an offering for that Mass.
Can. 952 §1 The provincial council or
the provincial Bishops’ meeting is to determine by decree, for the whole of the
province, what offering is to be made for the celebration and application of
Mass. Nonetheless, it is permitted to accept, for the application of a Mass, an
offering voluntarily made, which is greater, or even less, than that which has
been determined.
§2 Where there is no such decree, the custom existing
in the diocese is to be observed.
§3 Members of religious institutes of all kinds must
abide by the decree or the local custom mentioned in §§1 and 2.
Can. 953 No one may accept more
offerings for Masses to be celebrated by himself than he can discharge within a
year.
Can. 954 If in certain churches or
oratories more Masses are requested than can be celebrated there, these may be
celebrated elsewhere, unless the donors have expressly stipulated otherwise.
Can. 955 §1 One who intends to transfer
to others the celebration of Masses to be applied, is to transfer them as soon
as possible to priests of his own choice, provided he is certain that they are
of proven integrity. He must transfer the entire offering received, unless it
is quite certain that an amount in excess of the diocesan offering was given as
a personal gift. Moreover, it is his obligation to see to the celebration of
the Masses until such time as he has received evidence that the obligation has been
undertaken and the offering received.
§2 Unless it is established otherwise, the time within
which Masses are to be celebrated begins from the day the priest who is to
celebrate them receives them.
§3 Those who transfer to others Masses to be
celebrated are without delay to record in a book both the Masses which they
have accepted and those which they have passed on, noting also the offerings
for these Masses.
§4 Each priest must accurately record the Masses which
he has accepted to celebrate and those which he has in fact celebrated.
Can. 956 Each and every
administrator of pious causes and those, whether clerics or lay persons, who
are in any way obliged to provide for the celebration of Masses, are to
transfer to their Ordinaries, in a manner to be determined by the latter, such
Mass obligations as have not been discharged within a year.
Can. 957 The duty and the right to
see that Mass obligations are fulfilled belongs, in the case of churches of the
secular clergy, to the local Ordinary; in the case of churches of religious
institutes or societies of apostolic life, to their Superiors.
Can. 958 §1 The parish priest, as well
as the rector of a church or other pious place in which Mass offerings are
usually received, is to have a special book in which he is accurately to record
the number, the intention and the offering of the Masses to be celebrated, and
the fact of their celebration.
§2 The Ordinary is obliged to inspect these books each
year, either personally or through others.
Can. 959 In the sacrament of penance
the faithful who confess their sins to a lawful minister, are sorry for those
sins and have a purpose of amendment, receive from God, through the absolution
given by that minister, forgiveness of sins they have committed after baptism,
and at the same time they are reconciled with the Church, which by sinning they
wounded.
Can. 960 Individual and integral
confession and absolution constitute the sole ordinary means by which a member
of the faithful who is conscious of grave sin is reconciled with God and with
the Church. Physical or moral impossibility alone excuses from such confession,
in which case reconciliation may be attained by other means also.
Can. 961 §1 General absolution, without
prior individual confession, cannot be given to a number of penitents together,
unless:
1° danger of death threatens and there is not time for
the priest or priests to hear the confessions of the individual penitents;
2° there exists a grave necessity, that is, given the
number of penitents, there are not enough confessors available properly to hear
the individual confessions within an appropriate time, so that without fault of
their own the penitents are deprived of the sacramental grace or of holy
communion for a lengthy period of time. A sufficient necessity is not, however,
considered to exist when confessors cannot be available merely because of a
great gathering of penitents, such as can occur on some major feastday or pilgrimage.
§2 It is for the diocesan Bishop to judge whether the
conditions required in §1, n. 2 are present; mindful of the criteria agreed
with the other members of the Episcopal Conference, he can determine the cases
of such necessity.
[The m.p. Misericordia Dei, 7.IV.2002, further specifies the conditions required in §1, n. 2, and forbids the artificial creation of situations of “grave necessity”]
Can. 962 §1 For a member of Christ’s
faithful to benefit validly from a sacramental absolution given to a number of
people simultaneously, it is required not only that he or she be properly
disposed, but be also at the same time personally resolved to confess in due
time each of the grave sins which cannot for the moment be thus confessed.
§2 Christ’s faithful are to be instructed about the
requirements set out in §1, as far as possible even on the occasion of general
absolution being received. An exhortation that each person should make an act
of contrition is to precede a general absolution, even in the case of danger of
death if there is time.
Can. 963 Without prejudice to the
obligation mentioned in can. 989, a person whose grave sins are forgiven by a
general absolution, is as soon as possible, when the opportunity occurs, to
make an individual confession before receiving another general absolution,
unless a just reason intervenes.
Can. 964 §1 The proper place for
hearing sacramental confessions is a church or oratory.
§2 As far as the confessional is concerned, norms are to be issued by the Episcopal Conference, with the proviso however that confessionals, which the faithful who so wish may freely use, are located in an open place, and fitted with a fixed grille between the penitent and the confessor.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 964 §2, 7.VII.1998, allows the minister of the
sacrament to require the use of a fixed grille even if the penitent requests
otherwise]
§3 Except for a just reason, confessions are not to be
heard elsewhere than in a confessional.
Can. 965 Only a priest is the
minister of the sacrament of penance.
Can. 966 §1 For the valid absolution of
sins, it is required that, in addition to the power of order, the minister has
the faculty to exercise that power in respect of the faithful to whom he gives
absolution.
§2 A priest can be given this faculty either by the
law itself, or by a concession issued by the competent authority in accordance
with can. 969.
Can. 967 §1 Besides the Roman Pontiff,
Cardinals by virtue of the law itself have the faculty to hear the confessions
of Christ’s faithful everywhere. Likewise, Bishops have this faculty, which
they may lawfully use everywhere, unless in a particular case the diocesan
Bishop has refused.
§2 Those who have the faculty habitually to hear
confessions, whether by virtue of their office or by virtue of a concession by
the Ordinary of either the place of incardination or that in which they have a
domicile, can exercise that faculty everywhere, unless in a particular case the
local Ordinary has refused, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 974 §§2
and 3.
§3 In respect of the members and of those others who
live day and night in a house of an institute or society, this same faculty is
by virtue of the law itself possessed everywhere by those who have the faculty
to hear confessions, whether by virtue of their office or by virtue of a
special concession of the competent Superior in accordance with cann. 968 §2 and 969 §2. They may lawfully use this
faculty, unless in a particular case some major Superior has, in respect of his
own subjects, refused.
Can. 968 §1 By virtue of his office,
for each within the limits of his jurisdiction, the faculty to hear confessions
belongs to the local Ordinary, to the canon penitentiary, to the parish priest,
and to those others who are in the place of the parish priest.
§2 By virtue of their office, the faculty to hear the
confessions of their own subjects and of those others who live day and night in
the house, belongs to the Superiors of religious institutes or of societies of
apostolic life, if they are clerical and of pontifical right, who in accordance
with the constitutions have executive power of governance, without prejudice
however to the provision of can. 630 §4.
Can. 969 §1 Only the local Ordinary is
competent to give to any priests whomsoever the faculty to hear the confessions
of any whomsoever of the faithful. Priests who are members of religious
institutes may not, however, use this faculty without the permission, at least
presumed, of their Superior.
§2 The Superior of a religious institute or of a
society of apostolic life, mentioned in can. 968 §2, is competent to give to
any priests whomsoever the faculty to hear the confessions of his own subjects
and of those others who live day and night in the house.
Can. 970 The faculty to hear
confessions is not to be given except to priests whose suitability has been
established, either by examination or by some other means.
Can. 971 The local Ordinary is not
to give the faculty habitually to hear confessions to a priest, even to one who
has a domicile or quasi‑domicile within his jurisdiction, without first,
as far as possible, consulting that priest’s own Ordinary.
Can. 972 The faculty to hear
confessions may be given by the competent authority mentioned in can. 969, for
either an indeterminate or a determinate period of time.
Can. 973 The faculty habitually to
hear confessions is to be given in writing.
Can. 974 §1 Neither the local Ordinary
nor the competent Superior may, except for a grave reason, revoke the grant of
a faculty habitually to hear confessions.
§2 If the faculty to hear confessions granted by the
local Ordinary mentioned in can. 967 §2, is revoked by that Ordinary, the
priest loses the faculty everywhere. If the faculty is revoked by another local
Ordinary, the priest loses it only in the territory of the Ordinary who revokes
it.
§3 Any local Ordinary who has revoked a priest’s
faculty to hear confessions is to notify the Ordinary who is proper to that
priest by reason of incardination or, if the priest is a member of a religious
institute, his competent Superior.
§4 If the faculty to hear confessions is revoked by
his own major Superior, the priest loses everywhere the faculty to hear the
confessions of the members of the institute. But if the faculty is revoked by
another competent Superior, the priest loses it only in respect of those
subjects who are in that Superior’s jurisdiction.
Can. 975 Apart from revocation, the
faculty mentioned in can. 967 §2 ceases by loss of office, by excardination, or
by loss of domicile.
Can. 976 Any priest, even though he
lacks the faculty to hear confessions, can validly and lawfully absolve any
penitents who are in danger of death, from any censures and sins, even if an
approved priest is present.
Can. 977 The absolution of a partner
in a sin against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue is invalid, except in
danger of death.
Can. 978 §1 In hearing confessions the
priest is to remember that he is at once both judge and healer, and that he is
constituted by God as a minister of both divine justice and divine mercy, so
that he may contribute to the honour of God and the salvation of souls.
§2 In administering the sacrament, the confessor, as a
minister of the Church, is to adhere faithfully to the teaching of the magisterium and to the norms laid down
by the competent authority.
Can. 979 In asking questions the
priest is to act with prudence and discretion, taking into account the
condition and the age of the penitent, and he is to refrain from enquiring the
name of a partner in sin.
Can. 980 If the confessor is in no
doubt about the penitent’s disposition and the penitent asks for absolution, it
is not to be denied or delayed.
Can. 981 The confessor is to impose
salutary and appropriate penances, in proportion to the kind and number of sins
confessed, taking into account, however, the condition of the penitent. The
penitent is bound personally to fulfil these penances.
Can. 982 A person who confesses to
having falsely denounced to ecclesiastical authority a confessor innocent of
the crime of solicitation to a sin against the sixth commandment of the
Decalogue, is not to be absolved unless that person has first formally withdrawn
the false denunciation and is prepared to make good whatever harm may have been
done.
Can. 983 §1 The sacramental seal is
inviolable. Accordingly, it is absolutely wrong for a confessor in any way to
betray the penitent, for any reason whatsoever, whether by word or in any other
fashion.
§2 An interpreter, if there is one, is also obliged to
observe this secret, as are all others who in any way whatever have come to a
knowledge of sins from a confession.
[See the offences in the revised can. 1386]
[See also Apostolic Penitentiary, Note on the Internal Forum and the Inviolability of the Sacramental Seal, 29.VI.2019, on the sacramental seal, the internal extra-sacramental forum and spiritual direction, and secrets and other limits inherent to communication]
Can. 984 §1 The confessor is wholly
forbidden to use knowledge acquired in confession to the detriment of the
penitent, even when all danger of disclosure is excluded.
§2 A person who is in authority may not in any way,
for the purpose of external governance, use knowledge about sins which has at
any time come to him from the hearing of confession.
Can. 985 The director and assistant
director of novices, and the rector of a seminary or of any other institute of
education, are not to hear the sacramental confessions of their students
resident in the same house, unless in individual instances the students of
their own accord request it.
Can. 986 §1 All to whom by virtue of
office the care of souls is committed, are bound to provide for the hearing of
the confessions of the faithful entrusted to them, who reasonably request
confession, and they are to provide these faithful with an opportunity to make
individual confession on days and at times arranged to suit them.
§2 In an urgent necessity, every confessor is bound to
hear the confessions of Christ’s faithful, and in danger of death every priest
is so obliged.
Can. 987 In order that the faithful
may receive the saving remedy of the sacrament of penance, they must be so
disposed that, repudiating the sins they have committed and having the purpose
of amending their lives, they turn back to God.
Can. 988 §1 The faithful are bound to
confess, in kind and in number, all grave sins committed after baptism, of
which after careful examination of conscience they are aware, which have not
yet been directly pardoned by the keys of the Church, and which have not been
confessed in an individual confession.
§2 The faithful are recommended to confess also venial
sins.
Can. 989 All the faithful who have
reached the age of discretion are bound faithfully to confess their grave sins
at least once a year.
Can. 990 No one is forbidden to
confess through an interpreter, provided however that abuse and scandal are
avoided, and without prejudice to the provision of can. 983 §2.
Can. 991 All Christ’s faithful are
free to confess their sins to lawfully approved confessors of their own choice,
even to one of another rite.
Can. 992 An indulgence is the
remission in the sight of God of the temporal punishment due for sins, the
guilt of which has already been forgiven. A member of Christ’s faithful who is
properly disposed and who fulfils certain specific conditions, may gain an indulgence
by the help of the Church which, as the minister of redemption, authoritatively
dispenses and applies the treasury of the merits of Christ and the Saints.
Can. 993 An indulgence is partial or
plenary according as it partially or wholly frees a person from the temporal
punishment due for sins.
Can. 994 All members of the faithful
can gain indulgences, partial or plenary, for themselves, or they can apply
them by way of suffrage to the dead.
Can. 995 §1 Apart from the supreme
authority in the Church, only those can grant indulgences to whom this power is
either acknowledged in the law, or given by the Roman Pontiff.
§2 No authority below the Roman Pontiff can give to
others the faculty of granting indulgences, unless this authority has been
expressly given to the person by the Apostolic See.
Can. 996 §1 To be capable of gaining
indulgences a person must be baptised, not excommunicated, and in the state of
grace at least on the completion of the prescribed work.
§2 To gain them, however, the person who is capable
must have at least the intention of gaining them, and must fulfil the
prescribed works at the time and in the manner determined by the terms of the
grant.
Can. 997 As far as the granting and
the use of indulgences is concerned, the other provisions contained in the
special laws of the Church must also be observed.
Can. 998 The anointing of the sick,
by which the Church commends to the suffering and glorified Lord the faithful
who are dangerously ill so that he may support and save them, is conferred by
anointing them with oil and pronouncing the words prescribed in the liturgical
books.
Can. 999 The oil to be used in the
anointing of the sick can be blessed not only by a Bishop but also by:
1° those who are in law equivalent to the diocesan
Bishop;
2° in a case of necessity, any priest but only in the
actual celebration of the sacrament.
Can. 1000 §1 The anointings are to be
carried out accurately, with the words and in the order and manner prescribed
in the liturgical books. In a case of necessity, however, a single anointing on
the forehead, or even on another part of the body, is sufficient while the full
formula is recited.
§2 The minister is to anoint with his own hand, unless
a grave reason indicates the use of an instrument.
Can. 1001 Pastors of souls and those
who are close to the sick are to ensure that the sick are helped by this
sacrament in good time.
Can. 1002 The communal celebration of
anointing of the sick, for a number of the sick together, who have been
appropriately prepared and are rightly disposed, may be held in accordance with
the regulations of the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 1003 §1 Every priest, but only a
priest, can validly administer the anointing of the sick.
[A Note on the Minister of the Sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick, 11.II.2005, issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, states that the doctrine that only bishops and priests are ministers of the sacrament is definitive tenenda: neither deacons nor lay persons may administer the sacrament]
§2 All priests to whom has been committed the care of
souls, have the obligation and the right to administer the anointing of the
sick to those of the faithful entrusted to their pastoral care. For a
reasonable cause, any other priest may administer this sacrament if he has the
consent, at least presumed, of the aforementioned priest.
§3 Any priest may carry the holy oil with him, so that
in a case of necessity he can administer the sacrament of anointing of the
sick.
Can. 1004 §1 The anointing of the sick
can be administered to any member of the faithful who, having reached the use
of reason, begins to be in danger of death by reason of illness or old age.
§2 This sacrament can be repeated if the sick person,
having recovered, again becomes seriously ill or if, in the same illness, the
danger becomes more serious.
Can. 1005 If there is any doubt as to
whether the sick person has reached the age of reason, or is dangerously ill,
or is dead, this sacrament is to be administered.
Can. 1006 This sacrament is to be
administered to the sick who, when they were in possession of their faculties,
at least implicitly asked for it.
Can. 1007 The anointing of the sick
is not to be conferred upon those who obstinately persist in a manifestly grave
sin.
Can. 1008 By divine institution, some of the Christian faithful are marked with an indelible character and constituted as sacred ministers by the sacrament of holy orders. They are thus consecrated and deputed so that, each according to his own grade, they may serve the People of God by a new and specific title.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Omnium in mentem,
26.X.2009]
Can. 1009 §1 The orders are the
episcopate, the priesthood and the diaconate.
§2 They are conferred by the imposition of hands and
the prayer of consecration which the liturgical books prescribe for each grade.
§3 Those who are constituted in the order of the episcopate or the presbyterate receive the mission and capacity to act in the person of Christ the Head, whereas deacons are empowered to serve the People of God in the ministries of the liturgy, the word and charity.
[New paragraph added by m.p. Omnium in mentem,
26.X.2009]
[On the meaning of “in the person of Christ the Head” see Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Note Gestis verbisque, 25.I.2024, no. 24]
Can. 1010 An ordination is to be
celebrated during Mass, on a Sunday or holyday of obligation. For pastoral
reasons, however, it may take place on other days also, even on ferial days.
Can. 1011 §1 An ordination is normally
to be celebrated in the cathedral church. For pastoral reasons, however, it may
be celebrated in another church or oratory.
§2 Clerics and other members of Christ’s faithful are
to be invited to attend an ordination, so that the greatest possible number may
be present at the celebration.
Can. 1012 The minister of sacred
ordination is a consecrated Bishop.
Can. 1013 No Bishop is permitted to
consecrate anyone as Bishop, unless it is first established that a pontifical
mandate has been issued.
Can. 1014 Unless a dispensation has
been granted by the Apostolic See, the principal consecrating Bishop at an
episcopal consecration is to have at least two other consecrating Bishops with
him. It is, however, entirely appropriate that all the Bishops present should
join with these in consecrating the Bishop‑elect.
Can. 1015 §1 Each candidate is to be
ordained to the priesthood or to the diaconate by his proper Bishop, or with
lawful dimissorial letters granted by that Bishop.
§2 If not impeded from doing so by a just reason, a
Bishop is himself to ordain his own subjects. He may not, however, without an
apostolic indult lawfully ordain a subject of an oriental rite.
§3 Anyone who is entitled to give dimissorial
letters for the reception of orders may also himself confer these orders, if he
is a Bishop.
Can. 1016 In what concerns the
ordination to the diaconate of those who intend to enrol themselves in the
secular clergy, the proper Bishop is the Bishop of the diocese in which the
aspirant has a domicile, or the Bishop of the diocese to which he intends to
devote himself. In what concerns the priestly ordination of the secular clergy,
it is the Bishop of the diocese in which the aspirant was incardinated by the
diaconate.
Can. 1017 A Bishop may not confer
orders outside his own jurisdiction except with the permission of the diocesan
Bishop.
Can. 1018 §1 The following can give dimissorial letters for the secular clergy:
1° the proper Bishop mentioned in can. 1016;
2° the apostolic Administrator; with the consent of
the college of consultors, the diocesan Administrator; with the consent of the
council mentioned in can. 495 §2, the Pro‑vicar and Pro‑prefect
apostolic.
§2 The diocesan Administrator, the Pro‑vicar and
Pro‑prefect apostolic are not to give dimissorial
letters to those to whom admission to orders was refused by the diocesan Bishop
or by the Vicar or Prefect apostolic.
Can. 1019 §1 It belongs to the major
Superior of a clerical religious institute of pontifical right or of a clerical
society of apostolic life of pontifical right to grant dimissorial
letters for the diaconate and for the priesthood to his subjects who are, in
accordance with the constitutions, perpetually or definitively enrolled in the
institute or society.
§2 The ordination of all other candidates of whatever
institute or society, is governed by the law applying to the secular clergy,
any indult whatsoever granted to Superiors being revoked.
Can. 1020 Dimissorial
letters are not to be granted unless all the testimonials and documents
required by the law in accordance with cann. 1050 and
1051 have first been obtained.
Can. 1021 Dimissorial
letters may be sent to any Bishop in communion with the Apostolic See, but not
to a Bishop of a rite other than that of the ordinand, unless there is an
apostolic indult.
Can. 1022 When the ordaining Bishop
has received the prescribed dimissorial letters, he
may proceed to the ordination only when the authenticity of these letters is
established beyond any doubt whatever.
Can. 1023 Dimissorial
letters can be limited or can be revoked by the person granting them or by his
successor; once granted, they do not lapse on the expiry of the grantor’s
authority.
Can. 1024 Only a baptised man can
validly receive sacred ordination.
[See the offence now incorporated into the Code in the revised can. 1388 §3]
Can. 1025 §1 In order lawfully to confer
the orders of priesthood or diaconate, it must have been established, in
accordance with the proofs laid down by law, that in the judgement of the
proper Bishop or competent major Superior, the candidate possesses the requisite
qualities, that he is free of any irregularity or impediment, and that he has
fulfilled the requirements set out in can. 1033‑1039. Moreover, the
documents mentioned in can. 1050 must be to hand, and the investigation
mentioned in can. 1051 must have been carried out.
§2 It is further required that, in the judgement of
the same lawful Superior, the candidate is considered beneficial to the
ministry of the Church.
§3 A Bishop ordaining his own subject who is destined
for the service of another diocese, must be certain that the ordinand will in
fact be attached to that other diocese.
Article 1: The Requirements in those to be Ordained
Can. 1026 For a person to be
ordained, he must enjoy the requisite freedom. It is absolutely wrong to compel
anyone, in any way or for any reason whatsoever, to receive orders, or to turn
away from orders anyone who is canonically suitable.
Can. 1027 Aspirants to the diaconate
and the priesthood are to be formed by careful preparation in accordance with
the law.
Can. 1028 The diocesan Bishop or the
competent Superior must ensure that before they are promoted to any order,
candidates are properly instructed concerning the order itself and its
obligations.
Can. 1029 Only those are to be
promoted to orders who, in the prudent judgement of the proper Bishop or the
competent major Superior, all things considered, have sound faith, are
motivated by the right intention, are endowed with the requisite knowledge,
enjoy a good reputation, and have moral probity, proven virtue and the other
physical and psychological qualities appropriate to the order to be received.
[See the offence of voluntary concealment of a censure or irregularity in the revised can. 1388 §2]
Can. 1030 The proper Bishop or the
competent major Superior may, but only for a canonical reason, even one which
is occult, forbid admission to the priesthood to deacons subject to them who
were destined for the priesthood, without prejudice to recourse in accordance
with the law.
Can. 1031 §1 The priesthood may be
conferred only upon those who have completed their twenty‑fifth year of
age, and possess a sufficient maturity; moreover, an interval of at least six
months between the diaconate and the priesthood must have been observed. Those
who are destined for the priesthood are to be admitted to the order of
diaconate only when they have completed their twenty‑third year.
§2 A candidate for the permanent diaconate who is not
married may be admitted to the diaconate only when he has completed at least
his twenty‑fifth year; if he is married, not until he has completed at
least his thirty‑fifth year, and then with the consent of his wife.
§3 Episcopal Conferences may issue a regulation which
requires a later age for the priesthood and for the permanent diaconate.
§4 A dispensation of more than a year from the age
required by §§1 and 2 is reserved to the Apostolic See.
Can. 1032 §1 Aspirants to the priesthood
may be promoted to the diaconate only when they have completed the fifth year
of the curriculum of philosophical and theological studies.
§2 After completing the curriculum of studies and
before being promoted to the priesthood, deacons are to spend an appropriate
time, to be determined by the Bishop or by the competent major Superior,
exercising the diaconal order and taking part in the pastoral ministry.
§3 An aspirant to the permanent diaconate is not to be
promoted to this order until he has completed the period of formation.
Article 2: Prerequisites for Ordination
Can. 1033 Only one who has received
the sacrament of sacred confirmation may lawfully be promoted to orders.
Can. 1034 §1 An aspirant to the
diaconate or to the priesthood is not to be ordained unless he has first,
through the liturgical rite of admission, secured enrolment as a candidate from
the authority mentioned in cann. 1016 and 1019. He
must previously have submitted a petition in his own hand and signed by him,
which has been accepted in writing by the same authority.
§2 One who has by vows become a member of a clerical
institute is not obliged to obtain this admission.
Can. 1035 §1 Before anyone may be
promoted to the diaconate, whether permanent or transitory, he must have
received the ministries of lector and acolyte, and have exercised them for an
appropriate time.
§2 Between the conferring of the ministry of acolyte
and the diaconate there is to be an interval of at least six months.
Can. 1036 For a candidate to be
promoted to the order of diaconate or priesthood, he must submit to the proper
Bishop or to the competent major Superior a declaration written in his own hand
and signed by him, in which he attests that he will spontaneously and freely
receive the sacred order and will devote himself permanently to the
ecclesiastical ministry, asking at the same time that he be admitted to receive
the order.
Can. 1037 A candidate for the
permanent diaconate who is not married and likewise a candidate for the
priesthood, is not to be admitted to the order of diaconate unless he has, in
the prescribed rite, publicly before God and the Church undertaken the
obligation of celibacy, or unless he has taken perpetual vows in a religious
institute.
[A Decree of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Ritus ordinationum, 29.VI.1989 (AAS 82 (1990), 826-827) states that even a religious having taken sacred vows must specifically assume the obligation of celibacy before ordination to the diaconate]
Can. 1038 A deacon who refuses to be
promoted to the priesthood may not be forbidden the exercise of the order he
has received, unless he is constrained by a canonical impediment, or unless
there is some other grave reason, to be estimated by the diocesan Bishop or the
competent major Superior
Can. 1039 All who are to be promoted
to any order must make a retreat for at least five days, in a place and in the
manner determined by the Ordinary. Before he proceeds to the ordination, the
Bishop must have assured himself that the candidates have duly made the
retreat.
Article 3: Irregularities and other Impediments
Can. 1040 Those bound by an
impediment are to be barred from the reception of orders. An impediment may be
simple; or it may be perpetual, in which case it is called an irregularity. No
impediment is contracted which is not contained in the following canons.
[See the offence of voluntary concealment of an irregularity in the revised can. 1388 §2]
Can. 1041 The following persons are
irregular for the reception of orders:
1° one who suffers from any form of insanity, or from
any other psychological infirmity, because of which he is, after experts have
been consulted, judged incapable of being able to fulfil the ministry;
2° one who has committed the offence of apostasy,
heresy or schism;
3° one who has attempted marriage, even a civil
marriage, either while himself prevented from entering marriage whether by an
existing marriage bond or by a sacred order or by a public and perpetual vow of
chastity, or with a woman who is validly married or is obliged by the same vow;
4° one who has committed wilful homicide, or one who
has actually procured an abortion, and all who have positively cooperated;
5° one who has gravely and maliciously mutilated himself or another, or who has attempted suicide;
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 1041, 4º-5º, 31.V.2016, confirms that the term
“irregular” also includes non-Catholics who have committed the acts in 4° and
5°]
6° one who has carried out an act of order which is
reserved to those in the order of the episcopate or priesthood, while himself
either not possessing that order or being barred from its exercise by some
canonical penalty, declared or imposed.
Can. 1042 The following are simply
impeded from receiving orders:
1° a man who has a wife, unless he is lawfully
destined for the permanent diaconate;
2° one who exercises an office or administration
forbidden to clerics, in accordance with cann. 285
and 286, of which he must render an account; the impediment binds until such
time as, having relinquished the office and administration and rendered the
account, he has been freed;
3° a neophyte, unless, in the judgement of the
Ordinary, he has been sufficiently tested.
Can. 1043 Christ’s faithful are bound
to reveal, before ordination, to the Ordinary or to the parish priest, such
impediments to sacred orders as they may know about.
[See the revised can. 1388 §2]
Can. 1044 §1 The following are irregular
for the exercise of orders already received:
1° one who, while bound by an irregularity for the
reception of orders, unlawfully received orders;
2° one who committed the offence mentioned in can.
1041, n. 2, if the offence is public;
3° one who committed any of the offences mentioned in
can. 1041, nn. 3, 4, 5, 6.
§2 The following are impeded from the exercise of
orders:
1° one who, while bound by an impediment to the
reception of orders, unlawfully received orders;
2° one who suffers from insanity or from some other
psychological infirmity mentioned in can. 1041, n. 1, until such time as the
Ordinary, having consulted an expert, has allowed the exercise of the order in
question.
Can. 1045 Ignorance of irregularities
and impediments does not exempt from them.
Can. 1046 Irregularities and
impediments are multiplied if they arise from different causes, not however
from the repetition of the same cause, unless it is a question of the
irregularity arising from the commission of wilful homicide or from having
actually procured an abortion.
Can. 1047 §1 If the fact on which they
are based has been brought to the judicial forum, dispensation from all
irregularities is reserved to the Apostolic See alone.
§2 Dispensation from the following irregularities and
impediments to the reception of orders is also reserved to the Apostolic See:
1° irregularities arising from the offences mentioned
in can. 1041, nn. 2 and 3, if they are public;
2° an irregularity arising from the offence, whether
public or occult, mentioned in can. 1041, n. 4;
3° the impediment mentioned in can. 1042, n. 1.
§3 To the Apostolic See is also reserved the
dispensation from the irregularities for the exercise of an order received
mentioned in can. 1041, n. 3 but only in public cases, and in n. 4 of the same
canon even in occult cases.
§4 The Ordinary can dispense from irregularities and
impediments not reserved to the Holy See.
Can. 1048 In the more urgent occult
cases, if the Ordinary or, in the case of the irregularities mentioned in can.
1041, nn. 3 and 4,*
the Penitentiary cannot be approached, and if there is imminent danger of
serious harm or loss of reputation, the person who is irregular for the
exercise of an order may exercise it. There remains, however, the obligation of
his having recourse as soon as possible to the Ordinary or the Penitentiary,
without revealing his name, and through a confessor.
[*The reference should more properly be to can. 1044 §1, 3°]
Can. 1049 §1 In a petition to obtain a
dispensation from irregularities or impediments, all irregularities and
impediments are to be mentioned. However, a general dispensation is valid also
for those omitted in good faith, with the exception of the irregularities mentioned
in can. 1041, n. 4, or of others which have been brought to the judicial forum;
it is not, however, valid for those concealed in bad faith.
§2 If it is question of an irregularity arising from
wilful homicide or from a procured abortion, for the validity of the
dispensation even the number of offences must be stated.
§3 A general dispensation from irregularities and
impediments to the reception of orders is valid for all orders.
Article 4: Documents required and the Investigation
Can. 1050 For a person to be promoted
to sacred orders, the following documents are required:
1° a certificate of studies duly completed in
accordance with can. 1032;
2° for those to be ordained to the priesthood, a
certificate of the reception of the diaconate
3° for those to be promoted to the diaconate,
certificates of the reception of baptism, of confirmation and of the ministries
mentioned in can. 1035, and a certificate that the declaration mentioned in
can. 1036 has been made, if an ordinand to be promoted to the permanent
diaconate is married, a certificate of his marriage and testimony of his wife’s
consent.
Can. 1051 In the investigation of the
requisite qualities of one who is to be ordained, the following provisions are
to be observed:
1° there is to be a certificate from the rector of the
seminary or of the house of formation, concerning the qualities required in the
candidate for the reception of the order, namely sound doctrine, genuine piety,
good moral behaviour, fitness for the exercise of the ministry, likewise, after
proper investigation, a certificate of the candidate’s state of physical and
psychological health;
2° the diocesan Bishop or the major Superior may, in
order properly to complete the investigation, use other means which, taking
into account the circumstances of time and place, may seem useful, such as
testimonial letters, public notices or other sources of information.
Can. 1052 §1 For a Bishop to proceed to
an ordination which he is to confer by his own right, he must be satisfied that
the documents mentioned in can. 1050 are at hand and that, as a result of the
investigations prescribed by law, the suitability of the candidate has been
positively established.
§2 For a Bishop to proceed to the ordination of
someone not his own subject, it is sufficient that the dimissorial
letters state that those documents are at hand, that the investigation has been
conducted in accordance with the law, and that the candidate’s suitability has
been established. If the ordinand is a member of a religious institute or a
society of apostolic life, these letters must also testify that he has been
definitively enrolled in the institute or society and that he is a subject of
the Superior who gives the letters.
§3 If, not withstanding all
this, the Bishop has definite reasons for doubting that the candidate is
suitable to receive orders, he is not to promote him.
Can. 1053 §1 After an ordination, the
names of the individuals ordained, the name of the ordaining minister, and the
place and date of ordination are to be entered in a special register which is
to be carefully kept in the curia of the place of ordination. All the documents
of each ordination are to be accurately preserved.
§2 The ordaining Bishop is to give to each person
ordained an authentic certificate of the ordination received. Those who, with dimissorial letters, have been promoted by a Bishop other
than their own, are to submit the certificate to their proper Ordinary for the
registration of the ordination in a special register, to be kept in the
archive.
Can. 1054 The local Ordinary, if it
concerns the secular clergy, or the competent major Superior, if it concerns
his subjects, is to send a notification of each ordination to the parish priest
of the place of baptism. The parish priest is to record the ordination in the
baptismal register in accordance with can. 535 §2.
Can. 1055 §1 The marriage covenant, by
which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of their
whole life, and which of its own very nature is ordered to the well‑being
of the spouses and to the procreation and upbringing of children, has, between
the baptised, been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament.
§2 Consequently, a
valid marriage contract cannot exist between baptised persons without its being
by that very fact a sacrament.
[On the relationship between faith and the sacrament of marriage see International Theological Commission, The Reciprocity between Faith and Sacraments in the Sacramental Economy (2020), nos. 132-182]
Can. 1056 The essential properties of
marriage are unity and indissolubility; in Christian marriage they acquire a
distinctive firmness by reason of the sacrament.
Can. 1057 §1 A marriage is brought into
being by the lawfully manifested consent of persons who are legally capable.
This consent cannot be supplied by any human power.
§2 Matrimonial consent is an act of will by which a
man and a woman by an irrevocable covenant mutually give and accept one another
for the purpose of establishing a marriage.
Can. 1058 All can contract marriage
who are not prohibited by law.
Can. 1059 The marriage of Catholics,
even if only one party is baptised, is governed not only by divine law but also
by canon law, without prejudice to the competence of the civil authority in
respect of the merely civil effects of the marriage.
Can. 1060 Marriage enjoys the favour
of law. Consequently, in doubt the validity of a marriage must be upheld until
the contrary is proven.
Can. 1061 §1 A valid marriage between
baptised persons is said to be merely ratified, if it is not consummated;
ratified and consummated, if the spouses have in a human manner engaged
together in a conjugal act in itself apt for the generation of offspring. To
this act marriage is by its nature ordered and by it the spouses become one
flesh.
§2 If the spouses have lived together after the
celebration of their marriage, consummation is presumed until the contrary is
proven.
§3 An invalid marriage is said to be putative if it
has been celebrated in good faith by at least one party. It ceases to be such
when both parties become certain of its nullity.
Can. 1062 §1 A promise of marriage,
whether unilateral or bilateral, called an engagement, is governed by the
particular law which the Episcopal Conference has enacted, after consideration
of such customs and civil laws as may exist.
§2 No right of action to request the celebration of
marriage arises from a promise of marriage, but there does arise an action for
such reparation of damages as may be due.
Can. 1063 Pastors of souls are
obliged to ensure that their own church community provides for Christ’s
faithful the assistance by which the married state is preserved in its Christian
character and develops in perfection. This assistance is to be given
principally:
1° by preaching, by catechetical instruction adapted
to children, young people and adults, indeed by the use of the means of social
communication, so that Christ’s faithful are instructed in the meaning of Christian
marriage and in the role of Christian spouses and parents;
2° by personal preparation for entering marriage, so
that the spouses are disposed to the holiness and the obligations of their new
state;
3° by the fruitful celebration of the marriage
liturgy, so that it clearly emerges that the spouses manifest, and participate
in, the mystery of the unity and fruitful love between Christ and the Church;
4° by the help given to those who have entered
marriage, so that by faithfully observing and protecting their conjugal
covenant, they may day by day achieve a holier and a fuller family life.
Can. 1064 It is the responsibility of
the local Ordinary to ensure that this assistance is duly organised. If it is
considered opportune, he should consult with men and women of proven experience
and expertise.
Can. 1065 §1 Catholics who have not yet
received the sacrament of confirmation are to receive it before being admitted
to marriage, if this can be done without grave inconvenience.
§2 So that the sacrament of marriage may be fruitfully
received, spouses are earnestly recommended that they approach the sacraments
of penance and the blessed Eucharist.
Can. 1066 Before a marriage takes
place, it must be established that nothing stands in the way of its valid and
lawful celebration.
Can. 1067 The Episcopal Conference is
to lay down norms concerning the questions to be asked of the parties, the
publication of marriage banns, and the other appropriate means of enquiry to be
carried out before marriage. Only when he has carefully observed these norms
may the parish priest assist at a marriage.
[According to an Authentic Interpretation of the former canon 1686 (pre-Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus), 11.VII.1984, the pre-nuptial process in cann. 1066-1067 is sufficient for proving the state of freedom of those who, although bound to the canonical form, attempted marriage before a civil official or non-Catholic minister; in such cases the documentary process is not required]
Can. 1068 In danger of death, if
other proofs are not available, it suffices, unless there are contrary
indications, to have the assertion of the parties, sworn if need be, that they
are baptised and free of any impediment.
Can. 1069 Before the celebration of a
marriage, all the faithful are bound to reveal to the parish priest or the
local Ordinary such impediments as they may know about.
Can. 1070 If someone other than the
parish priest whose function it is to assist at the marriage has made the
investigations, he is by an authentic document to inform that parish priest of
the outcome of these enquiries as soon as possible.
Can. 1071 §1 Except in a case of
necessity, no one is to assist without the permission of the local Ordinary at:
1° a marriage of vagi;
2° a marriage which cannot be recognised by the civil
law or celebrated in accordance with it;
3° a marriage of a person for whom a previous union
has created natural obligations towards a third party or towards children;
4° a marriage of a person who has notoriously rejected
the Catholic faith;
5° a marriage of a person who is under censure;
6° a marriage of a minor whose parents are either
unaware of it or are reasonably opposed to it;
7° a marriage to be entered by proxy, as mentioned in
can. 1105.
§2 The local Ordinary is not to give permission to
assist at the marriage of a person who has notoriously rejected the Catholic
faith unless, with the appropriate adjustments, the norms of can. 1125 have
been observed.
Can. 1072 Pastors of souls are to see
to it that they dissuade young people from entering marriage before the age
customarily accepted in the region.
Can. 1073 A diriment impediment
renders a person incapable of validly contracting a marriage.
Can. 1074 An impediment is said to be
public, when it can be proved in the external forum; otherwise, it is occult.
Can. 1075 §1 Only the supreme authority
in the Church can authentically declare when the divine law prohibits or
invalidates a marriage.
§2 Only the same supreme authority has the right to
establish other impediments for those who are baptised.
Can. 1076 A custom which introduces a
new impediment, or is contrary to existing impediments, is to be reprobated.
Can. 1077 §1 The local Ordinary can in a
specific case forbid a marriage of his own subjects, wherever they are
residing, or of any person actually present in his territory; he can do this
only for a time, for a grave reason and while that reason persists.
§2 Only the supreme authority in the Church can attach
an invalidating clause to a prohibition.
Can. 1078 §1 The local Ordinary can
dispense his own subjects wherever they are residing, and all who are actually
present in his territory, from all impediments of ecclesiastical law, except
for those whose dispensation is reserved to the Apostolic See.
§2 The impediments whose dispensation is reserved to
the Apostolic See are:
1° the impediment arising from sacred orders or from a
public perpetual vow of chastity in a religious institute of pontifical right
2° the impediment of crime mentioned in can. 1090.
§3 A dispensation is never given from the impediment
of consanguinity in the direct line or in the second degree of the collateral
line.
Can. 1079 §1 When danger of death
threatens, the local Ordinary can dispense his own subjects, wherever they are
residing, and all who are actually present in his territory, both from the form
to be observed in the celebration of marriage, and from each and every impediment
of ecclesiastical law, whether public or occult, with the exception of the
impediment arising from the sacred order of priesthood.
§2 In the same circumstances mentioned in §1, but only
for cases in which not even the local Ordinary can be approached, the same
faculty of dispensation is possessed by the parish priest, by a properly
delegated sacred minister, and by the priest or deacon who assists at the
marriage in accordance with can. 1116 §2.
§3 In danger of death, the confessor has the power to
dispense from occult impediments for the internal forum, whether within the act
of sacramental confession or outside it.
§4 In the case mentioned in §2, the local Ordinary is
considered unable to be approached if he can be reached only by telegram or by
telephone.
Can. 1080 §1 Whenever an impediment is
discovered after everything has already been prepared for a wedding and the
marriage cannot without probable danger of grave harm be postponed until a
dispensation is obtained from the competent authority, the power to dispense
from all impediments, except those mentioned in can. 1078 §2, n. 1, is
possessed by the local Ordinary and, provided the case is occult, by all those
mentioned in can. 1079 §§2‑3, the conditions prescribed therein having
been observed.
§2 This power applies also to the validation of a
marriage when there is the same danger in delay and there is no time to have
recourse to the Apostolic See or, in the case of impediments from which he can
dispense, to the local Ordinary.
Can. 1081 The parish priest or the
priest or deacon mentioned in can. 1079 §2, should inform the local Ordinary
immediately of a dispensation granted for the external forum, and this
dispensation is to be recorded in the marriage register.
Can. 1082 Unless a rescript of the
Penitentiary provides otherwise, a dispensation from an occult impediment
granted in the internal nonsacramental forum, is to be recorded in the book to
be kept in the secret archive of the curia. No other dispensation for the external
forum is necessary if at a later stage the occult impediment becomes public.
Can. 1083 §1 A man cannot validly enter
marriage before the completion of his sixteenth year of age, nor a woman before
the completion of her fourteenth year.
§2 The Episcopal Conference may establish a higher age
for the lawful celebration of marriage.
Can. 1084 §1 Antecedent and perpetual
impotence to have sexual intercourse, whether on the part of the man or on that
of the woman, whether absolute or relative, by its very nature invalidates
marriage.
§2 If the impediment of impotence is doubtful, whether
the doubt be one of law or one of fact, the marriage is not to be prevented
nor, while the doubt persists, is it to be declared null.
§3 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1098,
sterility neither forbids nor invalidates a marriage.
Can. 1085 §1 A person bound by the bond
of a previous marriage, even if not consummated, invalidly attempts marriage.
§2 Even though the previous marriage is invalid or for
any reason dissolved, it is not thereby lawful to contract another marriage
before the nullity or the dissolution of the previous one has been established
lawfully and with certainty.
Can. 1086 §1 A marriage between two persons, one of whom was baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it, and the other of whom is not baptized, is invalid.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Omnium in mentem, 26.X.2009]
§2 This impediment is not to be dispensed unless the
conditions mentioned in cann. 1125 and 1126 have been
fulfilled.
§3 If at the time the marriage was contracted one
party was commonly understood to be baptised, or if his or her baptism was
doubtful, the validity of the marriage is to be presumed in accordance with
can. 1060, until it is established with certainty that one party was baptised
and the other was not.
Can. 1087 Those who are in sacred
orders invalidly attempt marriage.
Can. 1088 Those who are bound by a
public perpetual vow of chastity in a religious institute invalidly attempt
marriage.
Can. 1089 No marriage can exist
between a man and a woman who has been abducted, or at least detained, with a
view to contracting a marriage with her, unless the woman, after she has been
separated from her abductor and established in a safe and free place, chooses
marriage of her own accord.
Can. 1090 §1 One who, with a view to
entering marriage with a particular person, has killed that person’s spouse, or
his or her own spouse, invalidly attempts this marriage.
§2 They also invalidly attempt marriage with each
other who, by mutual physical or moral action, brought about the death of
either’s spouse.
Can. 1091 §1 Marriage is invalid between
those related by consanguinity in all degrees of the direct line, whether
ascending or descending, legitimate or natural.
§2 In the collateral line, it is invalid up to the
fourth degree inclusive.
§3 The impediment of consanguinity is not multiplied.
§4 A marriage is never to be permitted if a doubt
exists as to whether the parties are related by consanguinity in any degree of
the direct line, or in the second degree of the collateral line.
Can. 1092 Affinity in any degree of
the direct line invalidates marriage.
Can. 1093 The impediment of public
propriety arises when a couple live together after an invalid marriage, or from
a notorious or public concubinage. It invalidates marriage in the first degree
of the direct line between the man and those related by consanguinity to the
woman, and vice versa.
Can. 1094 Those who are legally
related by reason of adoption cannot validly marry each other if their
relationship is in the direct line or in the second degree of the collateral
line.
Can. 1095 The following are incapable
of contracting marriage:
1° those who lack sufficient use of reason;
2° those who suffer from a grave lack of discretionary
judgement concerning the essential matrimonial rights and obligations to be
mutually given and accepted;
3° those who, because of causes of a psychological
nature, are unable to assume the essential obligations of marriage.
Can. 1096 §1 For matrimonial consent to
exist, it is necessary that the contracting parties be at least not ignorant of
the fact that marriage is a permanent partnership between a man and a woman,
ordered to the procreation of children through some form of sexual cooperation.
§2 This ignorance is not presumed after puberty.
Can. 1097 §1 Error about a person
renders a marriage invalid.
§2 Error about a quality of the person, even though it
be the reason for the contract, does not render a marriage invalid unless this
quality is directly and principally intended.
Can. 1098 A person contracts
invalidly who enters marriage inveigled by deceit, perpetrated in order to
secure consent, concerning some quality of the other party, which of its very
nature can seriously disrupt the partnership of conjugal life.
Can. 1099 Provided it does not
determine the will, error concerning the unity or the indissolubility or the
sacramental dignity of marriage does not vitiate matrimonial consent.
Can. 1100 Knowledge of or opinion
about the nullity of a marriage does not necessarily exclude matrimonial
consent.
Can. 1101 §1 The internal consent of the
mind is presumed to conform to the words or the signs used in the celebration
of a marriage.
§2 If, however, either or both of the parties should
by a positive act of will exclude marriage itself or any essential element of
marriage or any essential property, such party contracts invalidly.
Can. 1102 §1 Marriage cannot be validly
contracted subject to a condition concerning the future.
§2 Marriage entered into subject to a condition
concerning the past or the present is valid or not, according as whatever is
the basis of the condition exists or not.
§3 However, a condition as mentioned in §2 may not
lawfully be attached except with the written permission of the local Ordinary.
Can. 1103 A marriage is invalid which was entered into by reason of force or of grave fear imposed from outside, even if not purposely, from which the person has no escape other than by choosing marriage.
[This defect of consent can be applied to marriages of non-Catholics: see
Authentic
Interpretation of canon 1103, 23.IV.1987]
Can. 1104 §1 To contract marriage
validly it is necessary that the contracting parties be present together,
either personally or by proxy.
§2 The spouses are to express their matrimonial
consent in words; if, however, they cannot speak, then by equivalent signs.
Can. 1105 §1 For a marriage by proxy to
be valid, it is required:
1° that there be a special mandate to contract with a
specific person;
2° that the proxy be designated by the mandator and
personally discharge this function;
§2 For the mandate to be valid, it is to be signed by
the mandator, and also by the parish priest or local Ordinary of the place in
which the mandate is given or by a priest delegated by either of them or by at
least two witnesses, or it is to be drawn up in a document which is authentic
according to the civil law.
§3 If the mandator cannot write, this is to be
recorded in the mandate and another witness added who is also to sign the
document; otherwise, the mandate is invalid.
§4 If the mandator revokes the mandate, or becomes
insane, before the proxy contracts in his or her name, the marriage is invalid,
even though the proxy or the other contracting party is unaware of the fact.
Can. 1106 Marriage can be contracted
through an interpreter, but the parish priest may not assist at such a marriage
unless he is certain of the trustworthiness of the interpreter.
Can. 1107 Even if a marriage has been
entered into invalidly by reason of an impediment or defect of form, the
consent given is presumed to persist until its withdrawal has been established.
Can. 1108 §1 Only those marriages are
valid which are contracted in the presence of the local Ordinary or parish
priest or of the priest or deacon delegated by either of them, who, in the
presence of two witnesses, assists, in accordance however with the rules set out
in the following canons, and without prejudice to the exceptions mentioned in cann. 144, 1112 §1, 1116 and 1127 §§2‑3.
[See Authentic
Interpretation of canon 87 §1, 5.VII.1985 which states that outside the
case of urgent danger of death a bishop may not grant a dispensation from
canonical form for the marriage of two Catholics]
§2 Only that person who, being present, asks the
contracting parties to manifest their consent and in the name of the Church
receives it, is understood to assist at a marriage.
§3. Only a priest validly assists at the marriage between two Eastern parties or between one Latin party and one Eastern Catholic or non-Catholic party.
[New paragraph added by m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
Can. 1109 Unless the local ordinary and pastor have been excommunicated, interdicted, or suspended from office or declared such through a sentence or decree, by virtue of their office and within the confines of their territory they assist validly at the marriages not only of their subjects but also of those who are not their subjects, provided that at least one of the two parties is ascribed to the Latin Church.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
Can. 1110 A personal Ordinary and a
personal parish priest by virtue of their office validly assist, within the
confines of their jurisdiction, at the marriages only of those of whom at least
one party is their subject.
Can. 1111 §1 As long as they hold office validly, the local ordinary and the pastor can delegate to priests and deacons the faculty, even a general one, of assisting at marriages within the limits of their territory, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1108 §3.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter Codices, 31.V.2016]
[A letter
of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, 27.III.2017, authorizes
Ordinaries to give permission for marriages of members of the Society of Saint
Pius X to be validly and lawfully celebrated in the Catholic Church]
§2 In order that the delegation of the faculty to
assist at marriages be valid, it must be expressly given to specific persons;
if there is question of a special delegation, it is to be given for a specific
marriage; if however there is question of a general delegation, it is to be
given in writing.
Can. 1112 §1 With the prior favourable opinion of the conference of bishops and after the permission of the Holy See has been obtained, the diocesan bishop can delegate lay persons to assist at marriages where priests or deacons are lacking, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1108 §3.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
§2 A suitable lay person is to be selected, capable of
giving instruction to those who are getting married, and fitted to conduct the
marriage liturgy properly.
Can. 1113 §1 Before a special delegation
is granted, provision is to be made for all those matters which the law
prescribes to establish the freedom to marry.
Can. 1114 One who assists at a
marriage acts unlawfully unless he has satisfied himself of the parties’
freedom to marry in accordance with the law and, whenever he assists by virtue
of a general delegation, has satisfied himself of the parish priest’s
permission, if this is possible.
Can. 1115 Marriages are to be
celebrated in the parish in which either of the contracting parties has a
domicile or a quasi‑domicile or a month’s residence or, if there is
question of vagi,
in the parish in which they are actually residing. With the permission of the
proper Ordinary or the proper parish priest, marriages may be celebrated
elsewhere.
Can. 1116 §1 If one who, in accordance
with the law, is competent to assist, cannot be present or be approached
without grave inconvenience, those who intend to enter a true marriage can
validly and lawfully contract in the presence of witnesses only:
1° in danger of death;
2° apart from danger of death, provided it is
prudently foreseen that this state of affairs will continue for a month.
§2 In either case, if another priest or deacon is at
hand who can be present, he must be called upon and, together with the
witnesses, be present at the celebration of the marriage, without prejudice to
the validity of the marriage in the presence of only the witnesses.
§3 In addition to the provisions established in §1, nn. 1 and 2, the local ordinary can confer to any Catholic priest the faculty to bless the marriage of faithful Christians of the Eastern Churches who are not in full communion with the Catholic Church if they request it spontaneously, and provided there is nothing to preclude the valid and licit celebration of the marriage. The same priest, however, with the necessary prudence, shall inform the competent authority of the interested non-Catholic Church of the case.
[New paragraph added by m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
Can. 1117 The form prescribed above must be observed if at least one of the parties contracting the marriage was baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1127 §2.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Omnium in mentem,
26.X.2009]
[See Authentic
Interpretation of canon 87 §1, 5.VII.1985 which states that outside the
case of urgent danger of death a bishop may not grant a dispensation from
canonical form for the marriage of two Catholics]
Can. 1118 §1 A marriage between Catholics,
or between a Catholic party and a baptised non‑Catholic, is to be
celebrated in the parish church. By permission of the local Ordinary or of the
parish priest, it may be celebrated in another church or oratory.
§2 The local Ordinary can allow a marriage to be
celebrated in another suitable place.
§3 A marriage between a Catholic party and an
unbaptised party may be celebrated in a church or in another suitable place.
Can. 1119 Apart from a case of
necessity, in the celebration of marriage those rites are to be observed which
are prescribed in the liturgical books approved by the Church, or which are
acknowledged by lawful customs.
Can. 1120 The Episcopal Conference
can draw up its own rite of marriage, in keeping with those usages of place and
people which accord with the Christian spirit; it is to be reviewed by the Holy
See, and it is without prejudice to the law that the person who is present to
assist at the marriage is to ask for and receive the expression of the consent
of the contracting parties.
[On the juridical nature and scope of the review (recognitio)
see Explanatory
Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 28.IV.2006]
Can. 1121 §1 As soon as possible after
the celebration of a marriage, the parish priest of the place of celebration or
whoever takes his place, even if neither has assisted at the marriage, is to
record in the marriage register the names of the spouses, of the person who
assisted and of the witnesses, and the place and date of the celebration of the
marriage; this is to be done in the manner prescribed by the Episcopal
Conference or by the diocesan Bishop.
§2 Whenever a marriage is contracted in accordance
with can. 1116, the priest or deacon, if he was present at the celebration,
otherwise the witnesses, are bound jointly with the contracting parties as soon
as possible to inform the parish priest or the local Ordinary about the
marriage entered into.
§3 In regard to a marriage contracted with a
dispensation from the canonical form, the local Ordinary who granted the
dispensation is to see to it that the dispensation and the celebration are
recorded in the marriage register both of the curia, and of the proper parish
of the Catholic party whose parish priest carried out the inquiries concerning
the freedom to marry. The Catholic spouse is obliged as soon as possible to
notify that same Ordinary and parish priest of the fact that the marriage was cele brated, indicating also the
place of celebration and the public form whichwas
observed.
Can. 1122 §1 A marriage which has been
contracted is to be recorded also in the baptismal registers in which the
baptism of the spouses was entered.
§2 If a spouse contracted marriage elsewhere than in
the parish of baptism, the parish priest of the place of celebration is to send
a notification of the marriage as soon as possible to the parish priest of the
place of baptism.
Can. 1123 Whenever a marriage is
validated for the external forum, or declared invalid, or lawfully dissolved
other than by death, the parish priest of the place of the celebration of the
marriage must be informed, so that an entry may be duly made in the registers
of marriage and of baptism.
Can. 1124 Marriage between two baptized persons, one of whom was baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it after baptism, and the other a member of a Church or ecclesial community not in full communion with the Catholic Church, cannot be celebrated without the express permission of the competent authority.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Omnium in mentem,
26.X.2009]
Can. 1125 The local Ordinary can
grant this permission if there is a just and reasonable cause. He is not to
grant it unless the following conditions are fulfilled:
1° the Catholic party is to declare that he or she is
prepared to remove dangers of defecting from the faith, and is to make a
sincere promise to do all in his or her power in order that all the children be
baptised and brought up in the Catholic Church;
2° the other party is to be informed in good time of
these promises to be made by the Catholic party, so that it is certain that he
or she is truly aware of the promise and of the obligation of the Catholic
party;
3° both parties are to be instructed about the
purposes and essential properties of marriage, which are not to be excluded by
either contractant.
Can. 1126 It is for the Episcopal
Conference to prescribe the manner in which these declarations and promises,
which are always required, are to be made, and to determine how they are to be
established in the external forum, and how the non‑Catholic party is to
be informed of them.
Can. 1127 §1 The prescripts of can. 1108 are to be observed for the form to be employed in a mixed marriage; if however a Catholic party contracts marriage with a non-Catholic party of an Eastern Rite, the canonical form of the celebration must be observed for liceity only; for validity, however, the presence of a priest is required notwithstanding whatever else is to be observed in accordance with the law.
[Revised wording according to m.p. De concordia inter
Codices, 31.V.2016]
§2 If there are grave difficulties in the way of
observing the canonical form, the local Ordinary of the Catholic party has the
right to dispense from it in individual cases, having however consulted the
Ordinary of the place of the celebration of the marriage; for validity,
however, some public form of celebration is required. It is for the Episcopal
Conference to establish norms whereby this dispensation may be granted in a
uniform manner.
§3 It is forbidden to have, either before or after the
canonical celebration in accordance with §1, another religious celebration of
the same marriage for the purpose of giving or renewing matrimonial consent.
Likewise, there is not to be a religious celebration in which the Catholic
assistant and a non‑Catholic minister, each performing his own rite, ask
for the consent of the parties.
Can. 1128 Local Ordinaries and other
pastors of souls are to see to it that the Catholic spouse and the children
born of a mixed marriage are not without the spiritual help needed to fulfil
their obligations; they are also to assist the spouses to foster the unity of
conjugal and family life.
Can. 1129 The provisions of cann. 1127 and 1128 are to be applied also to marriages
which are impeded by the impediment of disparity of worship mentioned in can.
1086 §1.
Can. 1130 For a grave and urgent
reason, the local Ordinary may permit that a marriage be celebrated in secret.
Can. 1131 Permission to celebrate a
marriage in secret involves:
1° that the investigations to be made before the
marriage are carried out in secret;
2° that the secret in regard to the marriage which has
been celebrated is observed by the local Ordinary, by whoever assists, by the
witnesses and by the spouses.
Can. 1132 The obligation of observing
the secret mentioned in can. 1131 n. 2 ceases for the local Ordinary if from
its observance a threat arises of grave scandal or of grave harm to the
sanctity of marriage. This fact is to be made known to the parties before the
celebration of the marriage.
Can. 1133 A marriage celebrated in
secret is to be recorded only in a special register which is to be kept in the
secret archive of the curia.
Can. 1134 From a valid marriage there
arises between the spouses a bond which of its own nature is permanent and
exclusive. Moreover, in Christian marriage the spouses are by a special
sacrament strengthened and, as it were, consecrated for the duties and the
dignity of their state.
Can. 1135 Each spouse has an equal
obligation and right to whatever pertains to the partnership of conjugal life.
Can. 1136 Parents have the most grave
obligation and the primary right to do all in their power to ensure their
children’s physical, social, cultural, moral and religious upbringing.
Can. 1137 Children who are conceived
or born of a valid or of a putative marriage are legitimate.
Can. 1138 §1 The father is he who is
identified by a lawful marriage, unless by clear arguments the contrary is
proven.
§2 Children are presumed legitimate who are born at
least 180 days after the date the marriage was celebrated, or within 300 days
from the date of the dissolution of conjugal life.
Can. 1139 Illegitimate children are
legitimated by the subsequent marriage of their parents, whether valid or
putative, or by a rescript of the Holy See.
Can. 1140 As far as canonical effects
are concerned, legitimated children are equivalent to legitimate children in
all respects, unless it is otherwise expressly provided by the law.
Article 1: The Dissolution of the Bond
Can. 1141 A marriage which is
ratified and consummated cannot be dissolved by any human power or by any cause
other than death.
Can. 1142 A non‑consummated
marriage between baptised persons or between a baptised party and an unbaptised
party can be dissolved by the Roman Pontiff for a just reason, at the request
of both parties or of either party, even if the other is unwilling.
Can. 1143 §1 In virtue of the pauline privilege, a marriage entered into by two
unbaptised persons is dissolved in favour of the faith of the party who
received baptism, by the very fact that a new marriage is contracted by that
same party, provided the unbaptised party departs.
§2 The unbaptised party is considered to depart if he
or she is unwilling to live with the baptised party, or to live peacefully
without offence to the Creator, unless the baptised party has, after the
reception of baptism, given the other just cause to depart.
Can. 1144 §1 For the baptised person
validly to contract a new marriage, the unbaptised party must always be
interpellated whether:
1° he or she also wishes to receive baptism;
2° he or she at least is willing to live peacefully
with the baptised party without offence to the Creator.
§2 This interpellation is to be done after baptism.
However, the local Ordinary can for a grave reason permit that the
interpellation be done before baptism; indeed he can dispense from it, either
before or after baptism, provided it is established, by at least a summary and
extrajudicial procedure, that it cannot be made or that it would be useless.
Can. 1145 §1 As a rule, the interpellation is to be done on the authority of
the local Ordinary of the converted party. A period of time for reply is to be
allowed by this Ordinary to the other party, if indeed he or she asks for it,
warning the person however that if the period passes without any reply, silence
will be taken as a negative response.
§2 Even an interpellation made privately by the
converted party is valid, and indeed it is lawful if the form prescribed above
cannot be observed.
§3 In both cases there must be lawful proof in the
external forum of the interpellation having been done and of its outcome.
Can. 1146 The baptised party has the
right to contract a new marriage with a Catholic:
1° if the other party has replied in the negative to
the interpellation, or if the interpellation has been lawfully omitted;
2° if the unbaptised person, whether already
interpellated or not, who at first persevered in peaceful cohabitation without
offence to the Creator, has subsequently departed without just cause, without
prejudice to the provisions of cann. 1144 and 1145.
Can. 1147 However, the local Ordinary
can for a grave reason allow the baptised party, using the pauline
privilege, to contract marriage with a non‑Catholic party, whether
baptised or unbaptised; in this case, the provisions of the canons on mixed
marriages must also be observed.
Can. 1148 §1 When an unbaptised man who
simultaneously has a number of unbaptised wives, has received baptism in the Catholic
Church, if it would be a hardship for him to remain with the first of the
wives, he may retain one of them, having dismissed the others. The same applies
to an unbaptised woman who simultaneously has a number of unbaptised husbands.
§2 In the cases mentioned in §1, when baptism has been
received, the marriage is to be contracted in the legal form, with due
observance, if need be, of the provisions concerning mixed marriages and of
other provisions of law.
§3 In the light of the moral, social and economic
circumstances of place and person, the local Ordinary is to ensure that
adequate provision is made, in accordance with the norms of justice, Christian
charity and natural equity, for the needs of the first wife and of the others
who have been dismissed.
Can. 1149 An unbaptised person who,
having received baptism in the Catholic Church, cannot re‑establish
cohabitation with his or her unbaptised spouse by reason of captivity or
persecution, can contract another marriage, even if the other party has in the
meantime received baptism, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1141.
Can. 1150 In a doubtful matter the
privilege of the faith enjoys the favour of law.
Article 2: Separation while the Bond remains
Can. 1151 Spouses have the obligation
and the right to maintain their common conjugal life, unless a lawful reason
excuses them.
Can. 1152 §1 It is earnestly recommended
that a spouse, motivated by Christian charity and solicitous for the good of
the family, should not refuse to pardon an adulterous partner and should not
sunder the conjugal life. Nevertheless, if that spouse has not either expressly
or tacitly condoned the other’s fault, he or she has the right to sever the
common conjugal life, provided he or she has not consented to the adultery, nor
been the cause of it, nor also committed adultery.
§2 Tacit condonation occurs if the innocent spouse,
after becoming aware of the adultery, has willingly engaged in a marital
relationship with the other spouse; it is presumed, however, if the innocent
spouse has maintained the common conjugal life for six months, and has not had
recourse to ecclesiastical or to civil authority.
§3 Within six months of having spontaneously
terminated the common conjugal life, the innocent spouse is to bring a case for
separation to the competent ecclesiastical authority. Having examined all the
circumstances, this authority is to consider whether the innocent spouse can be
brought to condone the fault and not prolong the separation permanently.
Can. 1153 §1 A spouse who occasions
grave danger of soul or body to the other or to the children, or otherwise
makes the common life unduly difficult, provides the other spouse with a reason
to leave, either by a decree of the local Ordinary or, if there is danger in
delay, even on his or her own authority.
§2 In all cases, when the reason for separation
ceases, the common conjugal life is to be restored, unless otherwise provided
by ecclesiastical authority.
Can. 1154 When a separation of
spouses has taken place, provision is always, and in good time, to be made for
the due maintenance and upbringing of the children.
Can. 1155 The innocent spouse may
laudably readmit the other spouse to the conjugal life, in which case he or she
renounces the right to separation.
Can. 1156 §1 To validate a marriage
which is invalid because of a diriment impediment, it is required that the
impediment cease or be dispensed, and that at least the party aware of the
impediment renews consent.
§2 This renewal is required by ecclesiastical law for
the validity of the validation, even if at the beginning both parties had given
consent and had not afterwards withdrawn it.
Can. 1157 The renewal of consent must
be a new act of will consenting to a marriage which the renewing party knows or
thinks was invalid from the beginning.
Can. 1158 §1 If the impediment is
public, consent is to be renewed by both parties in the canonical form, without
prejudice to the provision of can. 1127 §3.
§2 If the impediment cannot be proved, it is
sufficient that consent be renewed privately and in secret, specifically by the
party who is aware of the impediment provided the other party persists in the
consent given, or by both parties if the impediment is known to both.
Can. 1159 §1 A marriage invalid because
of a defect of consent is validated if the party who did not consent, now does
consent, provided the consent given by the other party persists.
§2 If the defect of the consent cannot be proven, it
is sufficient that the party who did not consent, gives consent privately and
in secret.
§3 If the defect of consent can be proven, it is
necessary that consent be given in the canonical form.
Can. 1160 For a marriage which is
invalid because of defect of form to become valid, it must be contracted anew
in the canonical form, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1127 §2.
Article 2: Retroactive Validation
Can. 1161 §1 The retroactive validation
of an invalid marriage is its validation without the renewal of consent,
granted by the competent authority. It involves a dispensation from an
impediment if there is one and from the canonical form if it had not been
observed, as well as a referral back to the past of the canonical effects.
§2 The validation takes place from the moment the
favour is granted; the referral back, however, is understood to have been made
to the moment the marriage was celebrated, unless it is otherwise expressly
provided.
§3 A retroactive validation is not to be granted
unless it is probable that the parties intend to persevere in conjugal life.
Can. 1162 §1 If consent is lacking in
either or both of the parties, a marriage cannot be rectified by a retroactive
validation, whether consent was absent from the beginning or, though given at
the beginning, was subsequently revoked.
§2 If the consent was indeed absent from the beginning
but was subsequently given, a retroactive validation can be granted from the
moment the consent was given.
Can. 1163 §1 A marriage which is invalid
because of an impediment or because of defect of the legal form, can be
validated retroactively, provided the consent of both parties persists.
§2 A marriage which is invalid because of an
impediment of the natural law or of the divine positive law, can be validated
retroactively only after the impediment has ceased.
Can. 1164 A retroactive validation
may validly be granted even if one or both of the parties is unaware of it; it
is not, however, to be granted except for a grave reason.
Can. 1165 §1 Retroactive validation can
be granted by the Apostolic See.
§2 It can be granted by the diocesan Bishop in
individual cases, even if a number of reasons for nullity occur together in the
same marriage, assuming that for a retroactive validation of a mixed marriage
the conditions of can. 1125 will have been fulfilled. It cannot, however, be
granted by him if there is an impediment whose dispensation is reserved to the
Apostolic See in accordance with can. 1078 §2, or if there is question of an
impediment of the natural law or of the divine positive law which has now ceased.
Can. 1166 Sacramentals are sacred
signs which in a sense imitate the sacraments. They signify certain effects,
especially spiritual ones, and they achieve these effects through the
intercession of the Church.
Can. 1167 §1 Only the Apostolic See can
establish new sacramentals, or authentically interpret, suppress or change
existing ones.
§2 The rites and the formulae approved by
ecclesiastical authority are to be accurately observed when celebrating or
administering sacramentals.
Can. 1168 The minister of the
sacramentals is a cleric who has the requisite power. In accordance with the
liturgical books and subject to the judgement of the local Ordinary, certain
sacramentals can also be administered by lay people who possess the appropriate
qualities.
Can. 1169 §1 Consecrations and
dedications can be validly carried out by those who are invested with the
episcopal character, and by priests who are permitted to do so by law or by
legitimate grant.
§2 Any priest can
impart blessings, except for those reserved to the Roman Pontiff or to Bishops.
[See the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s Declaration Fiducia supplicans, 18.XII.2023]
§3 A deacon can impart only those blessings which are
expressly permitted to him by law.
Can. 1170 While blessings are to be
imparted primarily to Catholics, they may be given also to catechumens and,
unless there is a prohibition by the Church, even to non‑Catholics.
Can. 1171 Sacred objects, set aside
for divine worship by dedication or blessing, are to be treated with reverence.
They are not to be made over to secular or inappropriate use, even though they
may belong to private persons.
Can. 1172 §1 No one may lawfully
exorcise the possessed without the special and express permission of the local
Ordinary.
§2 This permission is to be granted by the local
Ordinary only to a priest who is endowed with piety, knowledge, prudence and
integrity of life.
Can. 1173 In fulfilment of the
priestly office of Christ, the Church celebrates the liturgy of the hours,
wherein it listens to God speaking to his people and recalls the mystery of
salvation. In this way, the Church praises God without ceasing, in song and
prayer, and it intercedes with him for the salvation of the whole world.
Can. 1174 §1 Clerics are obliged to
recite the liturgy of the hours, in accordance with can. 276 §2, n. 3; members
of institutes of consecrated life and of societies of apostolic life are
obliged in accordance with their constitutions.
§2 Others also of Christ’s faithful are earnestly
invited, according to circumstances, to take part in the liturgy of the hours
as an action of the Church.
Can. 1175 In carrying out the liturgy
of the hours, each particular hour is, as far as possible, to be recited at the
time assigned to it.
Can. 1176 §1 Christ’s faithful who have
died are to be given a Church funeral according to the norms of law.
§2 Church funerals are to be celebrated according to
the norms of the liturgical books. In these funeral rites the Church prays for
the spiritual support of the dead, it honours their bodies, and at the same
time it brings to the living the comfort of hope.
§3 The Church earnestly recommends that the pious
custom of burial be retained; but it does not forbid cremation, unless this is
chosen for reasons which are contrary to Christian teaching.
[See
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Instruction Ad
resurgendum cum Christo, 15.VIII.2016,
regarding the burial of the
deceased and the conservation of the ashes in the case of cremation; see also Dicastery
for the Doctrine of the Faith, Two
questions about the preservation of the ashes of the deceased following
cremation, 9.XII.2023]
Can. 1177 §1 The funeral of any deceased
member of the faithful should normally be celebrated in the church of that
person’s proper parish.
§2 However, any member of the faithful, or those in
charge of the deceased person’s funeral, may choose another church; this
requires the consent of whoever is in charge of that church and a notification
to the proper parish priest of the deceased.
§3 When death has occurred outside the person’s proper
parish, and the body is not returned there, and another church has not been
chosen, the funeral rites are to be celebrated in the church of the parish
where the death occurred, unless another church is determined by particular
law.
Can. 1178 The funeral ceremonies of a
diocesan Bishop are to be celebrated in his own cathedral church, unless he
himself has chosen another church.
Can. 1179 Normally, the funerals of
religious or of members of a society of apostolic life are to be celebrated in
their proper church or oratory: by the Superior, if the institute or society is
a clerical one; otherwise, by the chaplain.
Can. 1180 §1 If a parish has its own
cemetery, the deceased faithful are to be buried there, unless another cemetery
has lawfully been chosen by the deceased person, or by those in charge of that
person’s burial.
§2 All may, however, choose their cemetery of burial
unless prohibited by law from doing so.
Can. 1181 The provisions of can. 1264
are to be observed in whatever concerns the offerings made on the occasion of
funerals. Moreover, care is to be taken that at funerals there is to be no
preference of persons, and that the poor are not deprived of proper funeral
rites.
Can. 1182 After the burial an entry
is to be made in the register of the dead, in accordance with particular law.
Can. 1183 §1 As far as funeral rites are
concerned, catechumens are to be reckoned among Christ’s faithful.
§2 Children whose parents had intended to have them
baptised but who died before baptism, may be allowed Church funeral rites by
the local Ordinary.
§3 Provided their own minister is not available,
baptised persons belonging to a non‑Catholic Church or ecclesial
community may, in accordance with the prudent judgement of the local Ordinary,
be allowed Church funeral rites, unless it is established that they did not
wish this.
Can. 1184 §1 Church funeral rites are to
be denied to the following, unless they gave some signs of repentance before
death:
1° notorious apostates, heretics and schismatics;
2° those who for anti‑Christian motives chose
that their bodies be cremated;
3° other manifest sinners to whom a Church funeral
could not be granted without public scandal to the faithful.
§2 If any doubt occurs, the local Ordinary is to be
consulted and his judgement followed.
Can. 1185 Any form of funeral Mass is
also to be denied to a person who has been excluded from a Church funeral.
Can. 1186 To foster the
sanctification of the people of God, the Church commends to the special and
filial veneration of Christ’s faithful the Blessed Mary ever‑Virgin, the
Mother of God, whom Christ constituted the Mother of all. The Church also
promotes the true and authentic cult of the other Saints, by whose example the
faithful are edified and by whose intercession they are supported.
Can. 1187 Only those servants of God
may be venerated by public cult who have been numbered by ecclesiastical
authority among the Saints or the Blessed.
Can. 1188 The practice of exposing
sacred images in churches for the veneration of the faithful is to be retained.
However, these images are to be displayed in moderate numbers and in suitable
fashion, so that the Christian people are not disturbed, nor is occasion given
for less than appropriate devotion.
Can. 1189 The written permission of
the Ordinary is required to restore precious images needing repair: that is,
those distinguished by reason of age, art or cult, which are exposed in
churches and oratories to the veneration of the faithful. Before giving such permission,
the Ordinary is to seek the advice of experts.
Can. 1190 §1 It is absolutely wrong to
sell sacred relics.
§2 Distinguished relics, and others which are held in
great veneration by the people, may not validly be in any way alienated nor
transferred on a permanent basis, without the permission of the Apostolic See.
§3 The provision of §2 applies to images which are
greatly venerated in any church by the people.
[See Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, Instruction Relics in the Church: authenticity and preservation, 8.XII.2017, on the canonical procedure to follow in order to verify the authenticity of relics and mortal remains, to guarantee their preservation and to promote the veneration of relics]
Can. 1191 §1 A vow is a deliberate and
free promise made to God, concerning some good which is possible and better.
The virtue of religion requires that it be fulfilled.
§2 Unless they are prohibited by law, all who have an
appropriate use of reason are capable of making a vow.
§3 A vow made as a result of grave and unjust fear or
of deceit is by virtue of the law itself invalid.
Can. 1192 §1 A vow is public if it is
accepted in the name of the Church by a lawful Superior; otherwise, it is
private.
§2 It is solemn if it is recognised by the Church as
such; otherwise, it is simple.
§3 It is personal if it promises an action by the
person making the vow; real, if it promises some thing;
mixed, if it has both a personal and a real aspect.
Can. 1193 Of its nature a vow obliges
only the person who makes it.
Can. 1194 A vow ceases by lapse of
the time specified for the fulfilment of the obligation, or by a substantial
change in the matter promised, or by cessation of a condition upon which the
vow depended or of the purpose of the vow, or by dispensation, or by commutation.
Can. 1195 A person who has power over
the matter of a vow can suspend the obligation of the vow for such time as the
fulfilment of the vow would affect that person adversely.
Can. 1196 Besides the Roman Pontiff,
the following can dispense from private vows, provided the dispensation does
not injure the acquired rights of others;
1° the local Ordinary and the parish priest, in
respect of all their own subjects and also of peregrini;
2° the Superior of a religious institute or of a
society of apostolic life, if these are clerical and of pontifical right, in
respect of members, novices and those who reside day and night in a house of
the institute or society;
3° those to whom the faculty of dispensing has been
delegated by the Apostolic See or by the local Ordinary.
Can. 1197 What has been promised by
private vow can be commuted into something better or equally good by the person
who made the vow. It can be commuted into something less good by one who has
authority to dispense in accordance with can. 1196.
Can. 1198 Vows taken before religious
profession are suspended as long as the person who made the vow remains in the
religious institute.
Can. 1199 §1 An oath is the invocation
of the divine Name as witness to the truth. It cannot be taken except in truth,
judgement and justice.
§2 An oath which is required or accepted by the canons
cannot validly be taken by proxy.
Can. 1200 §1 A person who freely swears
on oath to do something is specially obliged by the virtue of religion to
fulfil that which he or she asserted by the oath.
§2 An oath extorted by deceit, force or grave fear is
by virtue of the law itself invalid.
Can. 1201 §1 A promissory oath is
determined by the nature and condition of the act to which it is attached.
§2 An act which directly threatens harm to others or
is prejudicial to the public good or to eternal salvation, is in no way
reinforced by an oath sworn to do that act.
Can. 1202 §1 The obligation of a
promissory oath ceases:
1° if it is remitted by the person in whose favour the
oath was sworn;
2° if what was sworn is substantially changed or,
because of altered circumstances, becomes evil or completely irrelevant, or
hinders a greater good;
3° if the purpose or the condition ceases under which
the oath may have been made;
4° by dispensation or commutation in accordance with can.
1203.
Can. 1203 Those who can suspend,
dispense or commute a vow have, in the same measure, the same power over a
promissory oath. But if dispensation from an oath would tend to harm others and
they refuse to remit the obligation, only the Apostolic See can dispense the
oath.
Can. 1204 An oath is subject to
strict interpretation, in accordance with the law and with the intention of the
person taking the oath or, if that person acts deceitfully, in accordance with
the intention of the person in whose presence the oath is taken.
Can. 1205 Sacred places are those
which are assigned to divine worship or to the burial of the faithful by the
dedication or blessing which the liturgical books prescribe for this purpose.
Can. 1206 The dedication of a place
belongs to the diocesan Bishop and to those equivalent to him in law. For a
dedication in their own territory they can depute any Bishop or, in exceptional
cases, a priest.
Can. 1207 Sacred places are blessed
by the Ordinary, but the blessing of churches is reserved to the diocesan
Bishop. Both may, however, delegate another priest for the purpose.
Can. 1208 A document is to be drawn
up to record the dedication or blessing of a church, or the blessing of a
cemetery. One copy is to be kept in the diocesan curia, the other in the
archive of the church.
Can. 1209 The dedication or the
blessing of a place is sufficiently established even by a single
unexceptionable witness, provided no one is harmed thereby.
Can. 1210 In a sacred place only
those things are to be permitted which serve to exercise or promote worship,
piety and religion. Anything out of harmony with the holiness of the place is
forbidden. The Ordinary may however, for individual cases, permit other uses,
provided they are not contrary to the sacred character of the place.
[See Congregation for Divine Worship, Letter 5.XI.1987, on concerts in churches]
Can. 1211 Sacred places are
desecrated by acts done in them which are gravely injurious and give scandal to
the faithful when, in the judgement of the local Ordinary, these acts are so
serious and so contrary to the sacred character of the place that worship may not
be held there until the harm is repaired by means of the penitential rite which
is prescribed in the liturgical books.
Can. 1212 Sacred places lose their
dedication or blessing if they have been in great measure destroyed, or if they
have been permanently made over to secular usage, whether by decree of the
competent Ordinary or simply in fact.
Can. 1213 Ecclesiastical authority
freely exercises its powers and functions in sacred places.
Can. 1214 The term church means a
sacred building intended for divine worship, to which the faithful have right
of access for the exercise, especially the public exercise, of divine worship.
Can. 1215 §1 No church is to be built
without the express and written consent of the diocesan Bishop.
§2 The diocesan Bishop is not to give his consent
until he has consulted the council of priests and the rectors of neighbouring
churches, and then decides that the new church can serve the good of souls and
that the necessary means will be available to build the church and to provide
for divine worship.
§3 Even though they have received the diocesan
Bishop’s consent to establish a new house in a diocese or city, religious
institutes must obtain the same Bishop’s permission before they may build a
church in a specific and determined place.
Can. 1216 In the building and
restoration of churches the advice of experts is to be used, and the principles
and norms of liturgy and of sacred art are to be observed.
Can. 1217 §1 As soon as possible after
completion of the building the new church is to be dedicated or at least
blessed, following the laws of the sacred liturgy.
§2 Churches, especially cathedrals and parish
churches, are to be dedicated by a solemn rite.
Can. 1218 Each church is to have its
own title. Once the church has been dedicated this title cannot be changed.
Can. 1219 All acts of divine worship
may be carried out in a church which has been lawfully dedicated or blessed,
without prejudice to parochial rights.
Can. 1220 §1 Those responsible are to
ensure that there is in churches such cleanliness and ornamentation as befits
the house of God, and that anything which is discordant with the sacred
character of the place is excluded.
§2 Ordinary concern for preservation and appropriate
means of security are to be employed to safeguard sacred and precious goods.
Can. 1221 Entry to a church at the
hours of sacred functions is to be open and free of charge.
Can. 1222 §1 If a church cannot in any
way be used for divine worship and there is no possibility of its being
restored, the diocesan Bishop may allow it to be used for some secular but not
unbecoming purpose.
§2 Where other grave reasons suggest that a particular
church should no longer be used for divine worship, the diocesan Bishop may
allow it to be used for a secular but not unbecoming purpose. Before doing so,
he must consult the council of priests; he must also have the consent of those
who could lawfully claim rights over that church, and be sure that the good of
souls would not be harmed by the transfer.
Can. 1223 An oratory means a place
which, by permission of the Ordinary, is set aside for divine worship, for the
convenience of some community or group of the faithful who assemble there, to
which however other members of the faithful may, with the consent of the
competent Superior, have access.
Can. 1224 §1 The Ordinary is not to give
the permission required for setting up an oratory unless he has first,
personally or through another, inspected the place destined for the oratory and
found it to be becomingly arranged.
§2 Once this permission has been given, the oratory
cannot be converted to a secular usage without the authority of the same
Ordinary.
Can. 1225 All sacred services may be
celebrated in a lawfully constituted oratory, apart from those which are
excluded by the law, by a provision of the local Ordinary, or by liturgical
laws.
Can. 1226 The term private chapel
means a place which, by permission of the local Ordinary, is set aside for
divine worship, for the convenience of one or more individuals.
Can. 1227 Bishops can set up for
their own use a private chapel which enjoys the same rights as an oratory.
Can. 1228 Without prejudice to the
provision of can. 1227, the permission of the local Ordinary is required for
the celebration of Mass and of other sacred functions in any private chapel.
Can. 1229 It is appropriate that
oratories and private chapels be blessed according to the rite prescribed in
the liturgical books. They must, however, be reserved for divine worship only
and be freed from all domestic use.
Can. 1230 The term shrine means a
church or other sacred place which, with the approval of the local Ordinary, is
by reason of special devotion frequented by the faithful as pilgrims.
Can. 1231 For a shrine to be
described as national, the approval of the Episcopal Conference is necessary.
For it to be described as international, the approval of the Holy See is
required.
Can. 1232 §1 The local Ordinary is
competent to approve the statutes of a diocesan shrine; the Episcopal
Conference, those of a national shrine; the Holy See alone, those of an
international shrine.
§2 The statutes of a shrine are to determine
principally its purpose, the authority of the rector, and the ownership and
administration of its property.
Can. 1233 Certain privileges may be
granted to shrines when the local circumstances, the number of pilgrims and
especially the good of the faithful would seem to make this advisable.
Can. 1234 §1 At shrines the means of
salvation are to be more abundantly made available to the faithful: by sedulous
proclamation of the word of God, by suitable encouragement of liturgical life,
especially by the celebration of the Eucharist and penance, and by the
fostering of approved forms of popular devotion.
§2 In shrines or in places adjacent to them, votive
offerings of popular art and devotion are to be displayed and carefully
safeguarded.
Can. 1235 §1 The altar or table on which
the Eucharistic Sacrifice is celebrated is termed fixed if it is so constructed
that it is attached to the floor and therefore cannot be moved; it is termed
movable, if it can be removed.
§2 It is proper that in every church there should be a
fixed altar. In other places which are intended for the celebration of sacred
functions, the altar may be either fixed or movable.
Can. 1236 §1 In accordance with the
traditional practice of the Church, the table of a fixed altar is to be of
stone, indeed of a single natural stone. However, even some other worthy and
solid material may be used, if the Episcopal Conference so judges. The support
or the base can be made from any material.
§2 A movable altar can be made of any solid material
which is suitable for liturgical use.
Can. 1237 §1 Fixed altars are to be
dedicated, movable ones either dedicated or blessed, according to the rites
prescribed in the liturgical books.
§2 The ancient tradition of placing relics of Martyrs
or of other Saints within a fixed altar is to be retained, in accordance with
the rites prescribed in the liturgical books.
Can. 1238 §1 An altar loses its
dedication or blessing in accordance with can. 1212.
§2 Altars, whether fixed or movable, do not lose their
dedication or blessing as a result of a church or other sacred place being made
over to secular usage.
Can. 1239 §1 An altar, whether fixed or
movable, is to be reserved for divine worship alone, to the exclusion of any
secular usage.
§2 No corpse is to be buried beneath an altar;
otherwise, it is not lawful to celebrate Mass at that altar.
Can. 1240 §1 Where possible, the Church
is to have its own cemeteries, or at least an area in public cemeteries which
is duly blessed and reserved for the deceased faithful.
§2 If, however, this is not possible, then individual
graves are to be blessed in due form on each occasion.
Can. 1241 §1 Parishes and religious
institutes may each have their own cemetery.
§2 Other juridical persons or families may each have
their own special cemetery or burial place which, if the local Ordinary judges
accordingly, is to be blessed.
Can. 1242 Bodies are not to be buried
in churches, unless it is a question of the Roman Pontiff or of Cardinals or,
in their proper Churches, of diocesan Bishops even retired.
Can. 1243 Appropriate norms are to be
enacted by particular law for the management of cemeteries, especially in what
concerns the protection and the fostering of their sacred character.
Can. 1244 §1 Only the supreme
ecclesiastical authority can establish, transfer or suppress holydays or days
of penance which are applicable to the universal Church, without prejudice to
the provisions of can. 1246 §2.
§2 Diocesan Bishops can proclaim special holydays or
days of penance for their own dioceses or territories, but only for individual
occasions.
Can. 1245 Without prejudice to the
right of diocesan Bishops as in can. 87, a parish priest, in individual cases,
for a just reason and in accordance with the prescriptions of the diocesan
Bishop, can give a dispensation from the obligation of observing a holyday or
day of penance, or commute the obligation into some other pious works. The
Superior of a pontifical clerical religious institute or society of apostolic
life has the same power in respect of his own subjects and of those who reside
day and night in a house of the institute or society.
Can. 1246 §1 The Lord’s Day, on which
the paschal mystery is celebrated, is by apostolic tradition to be observed in
the universal Church as the primary holyday of obligation. In the same way the
following holydays are to be observed: the Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Epiphany, the Ascension of Christ, the feast of the Body and Blood of
Christ, the feast of Mary the Mother of God, her Immaculate Conception, her
Assumption, the feast of St Joseph, the feast of the Apostles SS Peter and
Paul, and the feast of All Saints.
§2 However, the Episcopal Conference may, with the
prior approval of the Apostolic See, suppress certain holydays of obligation or
transfer them to a Sunday.
Can. 1247 On Sundays and other
holydays of obligation, the faithful are obliged to assist at Mass. They are
also to abstain from such work or business that would inhibit the worship to be
given to God, the joy proper to the Lord’s Day, or the due relaxation of mind
and body.
Can. 1248 §1 The obligation of assisting
at Mass is satisfied wherever Mass is celebrated in a Catholic rite either on a
holyday itself or on the evening of the previous day.
§2 If it is impossible to assist at a Eucharistic
celebration, either because no sacred minister is available or for some other
grave reason, the faithful are strongly recommended to take part in a liturgy
of the Word, if there be such in the parish church or some other sacred place,
which is celebrated in accordance with the provisions laid down by the diocesan
Bishop; or to spend an appropriate time in prayer, whether personally or as a
family or, as occasion presents, in a group of families.
Can. 1249 All Christ’s faithful are
obliged by divine law, each in his or her own way, to do penance. However, so
that all may be joined together in a certain common practice of penance, days
of penance are prescribed. On these days the faithful are in a special manner
to devote themselves to prayer, to engage in works of piety and charity, and to
deny themselves, by fulfilling their obligations more faithfully and especially
by observing the fast and abstinence which the following canons prescribe.
Can. 1250 The days and times of
penance for the universal Church are each Friday of the whole year and the
season of Lent.
Can. 1251 Abstinence from meat, or
from some other food as determined by the Episcopal Conference, is to be
observed on all Fridays, unless a solemnity should fall on a Friday. Abstinence
and fasting are to be observed on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday.
Can. 1252 The law of abstinence binds
those who have completed their fourteenth year. The law of fasting binds those
who have attained their majority, until the beginning of their sixtieth year.
Pastors of souls and parents are to ensure that even those who by reason of
their age are not bound by the law of fasting and abstinence, are taught the
true meaning of penance.
Can. 1253 The Episcopal Conference
can determine more particular ways in which fasting and abstinence are to be
observed. In place of abstinence or fasting it can substitute, in whole or in
part, other forms of penance, especially works of charity and exercises of
piety.
Can. 1254 §1 The Catholic Church has the
inherent right, independently of any secular power, to acquire, retain,
administer and alienate temporal goods, in pursuit of its proper objectives.
§2 These proper objectives are principally the
regulation of divine worship, the provision of fitting support for the clergy
and other ministers, and the carrying out of works of the sacred apostolate and
of charity, especially for the needy.
Can. 1255 The universal
Church, as well as the Apostolic See, particular Churches and all other public
and private juridical persons are capable of acquiring, retaining,
administering and alienating temporal goods, in accordance with the law.
[The m.p. Il diritto nativo, 20.II.2023, establishes that all the goods
of the various institutions that make up the Holy See are public ecclesiastical
goods]
Can. 1256 Under the supreme authority
of the Roman Pontiff, ownership of goods belongs to that juridical person which
has lawfully acquired them.
Can. 1257 §1 All temporal goods
belonging to the universal Church, to the Apostolic See or to other public
juridical persons in the Church, are ecclesiastical goods and are regulated by
the canons which follow, as well as by their own statutes.
§2 Unless it is otherwise expressly provided, temporal
goods belonging to a private juridical person are regulated by its own
statutes, not by these canons.
Can. 1258 In the canons which follow,
the term Church signifies not only the universal Church or the Apostolic See,
but also any public juridical person in the Church, unless the contrary is
clear from the context or from the nature of the matter.
Can. 1259 The Church may acquire
temporal goods in any way in which, by either natural or positive law, it is
lawful for others to do this.
Can. 1260 The Church has the inherent
right to require from the faithful whatever is necessary for its proper
objectives.
Can. 1261 §1 The faithful have the right
to donate temporal goods for the benefit of the Church.
§2 The diocesan Bishop is bound to remind the faithful
of the obligation mentioned in can. 222 §1, and in an appropriate manner to
urge it.
Can. 1262 The faithful are to give
their support to the Church in response to appeals and in accordance with the
norms laid down by the Episcopal Conference.
Can. 1263 The diocesan Bishop, after consulting the finance committee and the council of priests, has the right to levy on public juridical persons subject to his authority a tax for the needs of the diocese. This tax must be moderate and proportionate to their income. He may impose an extraordinary and moderate tax on other physical and juridical persons only in a grave necessity and under the same conditions, but without prejudice to particular laws and customs which may give him greater rights.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 1263, 20.V.1989, establishes that external schools
of religious insitutes of pontifical right are not
public juridical persons subject to the Bishop’s authority]
[A private response of the Dicastery for Legal Texts (Prot n. 18162/2023, 22.I.2024) clarifies that the bishop
can lawfully impose a tax on a gift bequeathed to a parish mortis causa]
Can. 1264 Unless the law prescribes
otherwise, it is for the provincial Bishops’ meeting to:
1° determine the taxes, to be approved by the
Apostolic See, for acts of executive authority which grant a favour, or for the
execution of rescripts from the Apostolic See;
2° determine the offerings on the occasion of the
administration of the sacraments and sacramentals.
Can. 1265 §1 Without prejudice to the
right of mendicant religious, all private juridical or physical persons are
forbidden to make a collection for any pious or ecclesiastical institute or
purpose without the written permission of their proper Ordinary and of the local
Ordinary.
§2 The Episcopal Conference can draw up rules
regarding collections, which must be observed by all, including those who from
their foundation are called and are ‘mendicants’.
Can. 1266 In all churches and
oratories regularly open to Christ’s faithful, including those belonging to
religious institutes, the local Ordinary may order that a special collection be
taken up for specified parochial, diocesan, national or universal initiatives.
The collection must afterwards be carefully forwarded to the diocesan curia.
Can. 1267 §1 Unless the contrary is
clear, offerings made to Superiors or administrators of any ecclesiastical
juridical person, even a private one, are presumed to have been made to the
juridical person itself.
§2 If there is question of a public juridical person,
the offerings mentioned in §1 cannot be refused except for a just reason and,
in matters of greater importance, with the permission of the Ordinary. Without
prejudice to the provisions of can. 1295, the permission of the Ordinary is
also required for the acceptance of offerings to which are attached some
qualifying obligation or condition.
§3 Offerings given by the faithful for a specified
purpose may be used only for that purpose.
Can. 1268 The Church recognises
prescription, in accordance with cann. 197‑199,
as a means both of acquiring temporal goods and of being freed from their
obligations.
Can. 1269 Sacred objects in private
ownership may be acquired by private persons by prescription, but they may not
be used for secular purposes unless they have lost their dedication or
blessing. If, however, they belong to a public ecclesiastical juridical person,
they may be acquired only by another public ecclesiastical juridical person.
Can. 1270 Immovable goods, precious
movable goods, rights and legal claims, whether personal or real, which belong
to the Apostolic See, are prescribed after a period of one hundred years. For
those goods which belong to another public ecclesiastical juridical person, the
period for prescription is thirty years.
Can. 1271 By reason of their bond of
unity and charity, and according to the resources of their dioceses, Bishops
are to join together to produce those means which the Apostolic See may from
time to time need to exercise properly its service of the universal Church.
Can. 1272 In those regions where
benefices properly so called still exist, it is for the Episcopal Conference to
regulate such benefices by appropriate norms, agreed with and approved by the
Apostolic See. The purpose of these norms is that the income and as far as
possible the capital itself of the benefice should by degrees be transferred to
the fund mentioned in can. 1274 §1.
Can. 1273 The Roman Pontiff, by
virtue of his primacy of governance, is the supreme administrator and steward
of all ecclesiastical goods.
Can. 1274 §1 In every diocese there is
to be a special fund which collects offerings and temporal goods for the
purpose of providing, in accordance with can. 281, for the support of the
clergy who serve the diocese, unless they are otherwise catered for.
§2 Where there is as yet no properly organised system
of social provision for the clergy, the Episcopal Conference is to see that a
fund is established which will furnish adequate social security for them.
§3 To the extent that it is required, a common reserve
is to be established in every diocese by which the Bishop is enabled to fulfil
his obligations towards other persons who serve the Church and to meet various
needs of the diocese, this can also be the means by which wealthier dioceses
may help poorer ones.
§4 Depending on differing local circumstances, the
purposes described in §§2 and 3 might better be achieved by amalgamating
various diocesan funds, or by cooperation between various dioceses, or even by
setting up a suitable association for them, or indeed for the whole territory
of the Episcopal Conference itself.
§5 If possible, these funds are to be established in
such a manner that they will have standing also in the civil law.
Can. 1275 A reserve set up by a
number of different dioceses is to be administered according to norms
opportunely agreed upon by the Bishops concerned.
Can. 1276 §1 Ordinaries must carefully
supervise the administration of all the goods which belong to public juridical
persons subject to them, without prejudice to lawful titles which may give the
Ordinary greater rights.
§2 Taking into account rights, lawful customs and the
circumstances, Ordinaries are to regulate the whole matter of the
administration of ecclesiastical goods by issuing special instructions, within
the limits of universal and particular law.
Can. 1277 In carrying out
acts of administration which, in the light of the financial situation of the
diocese, are of major importance, the diocesan Bishop must consult the finance
committee and the college of consultors. For acts of extraordinary
administration, except in cases expressly provided for in the universal law or
stated in the documents of foundation, the diocesan Bishop needs the consent of
the committee and of the college of consultors. It is for the Episcopal
Conference to determine what are to be regarded as acts of extraordinary
administration.
[Regarding acts of ordinary and extraordinary administration in the
Roman Curia, see m.p. On
the limits and modalities of ordinary
administration, 16.I.2024, and Rescriptum
ex audientia SS.mi circa i limiti e le modalità
dell’ordinaria amministrazione,
4.III.2024 (Communicationes I/2024, pp. 108-109)]
Can. 1278 Besides the duties
mentioned in can. 494 §§3 and 4, the diocesan Bishop may also entrust to the
financial administrator the duties mentioned in can. 1276 §1 and can. 1279 §2.
Can. 1279 §1 The administration of
ecclesiastical goods pertains to the one with direct power of governance over
the person to whom the goods belong, unless particular law or statutes or
legitimate custom state otherwise, and without prejudice to the right of the Ordinary
to intervene where there is negligence on the part of the administrator.
§2 Where no administrators are appointed for a public
juridical person by law or by the documents of foundation or by its own
statutes, the Ordinary to which it is subject is to appoint suitable persons as
administrators for a three‑year term. The same persons can be re‑appointed
by the Ordinary.
Can. 1280 Every juridical person is
to have its own finance committee, or at least two counsellors, who are to
assist in the performance of the administrator’s duties, in accordance with the
statutes.
Can. 1281 §1 Without prejudice to the
provisions of the statutes administrators act invalidly when they go beyond the
limits and manner of ordinary administration, unless they have first received
in writing from the Ordinary the faculty to do so.
§2 The statutes are to determine what acts go beyond
the limits and manner of ordinary administration. If the statutes are silent on
this point, it is for the diocesan Bishop, after consulting the finance
committee, to determine these acts for the persons subject to him.
§3 Except and insofar as it is to its benefit, a
juridical person is not held responsible for the invalid actions of its
administrators. The juridical person is, however, responsible when such actions
are valid but unlawful, without prejudice to its right to bring an action or
have recourse against the administrators who have caused it damage.
[See the offences against Church patrimony that are set out in the new can. 1376]
Can. 1282 All persons, whether
clerics or laity, who lawfully take part in the administration of
ecclesiastical goods, are bound to fulfil their duties in the name of the
Church, in accordance with the law.
Can. 1283 Before administrators
undertake their duties:
1° they must take an oath, in the presence of the
Ordinary or his delegate, that they will well and truly perform their office;
2° they are to draw up a clear and accurate inventory,
to be signed by themselves, of all immovable goods, of those movable goods
which are precious or of a high cultural value, and of all other goods, with a
description and an estimate of their value; when this has been compiled, it is
to be certified as correct;
3° one copy of this inventory is to be kept in the
administration office and another in the curial archive; any change which takes
place in the property is to be noted on both copies.
Can. 1284 §1 All administrators are to
perform their duties with the diligence of a good householder.
§2 Therefore they must:
1° be vigilant that no goods placed in their care in
any way perish or suffer damage; to this end they are, to the extent necessary,
to arrange insurance contracts;
2° ensure that the ownership of ecclesiastical goods
is safeguarded in ways which are valid in civil law;
3° observe the provisions of canon and civil law, and
the stipulations of the founder or donor or lawful authority; they are to take
special care that damage will not be suffered by the Church through the non‑observance
of the civil law;
4° seek accurately and at the proper time the income
and produce of the goods, guard them securely and expend them in accordance
with the wishes of the founder or lawful norms;
5° at the proper time pay the interest which is due by
reason of a loan or pledge, and take care that in due time the capital is
repaid;
6° with the consent of the Ordinary make use of money
which is surplus after payment of expenses and which can be profitably invested
for the purposes of the juridical person;
7° keep accurate records of income and expenditure;
8° draw up an account of their administration at the
end of each year;
9° keep in order and preserve in a convenient and
suitable archive the documents and records establishing the rights of the
Church or institute to its goods; where conveniently possible, authentic copies
must be placed in the curial archives.
§3 It is earnestly recommended that administrators
draw up each year a budget of income and expenditure. However, it is left to
particular law to make this an obligation and to determine more precisely how
it is to be presented.
Can. 1285 Solely within the limits of
ordinary administration, administrators are allowed to make gifts for pious
purposes or Christian charity out of the movable goods which do not form part
of the stable patrimony.
Can. 1286 Administrators of temporal
goods:
1° in making contracts of employment, are accurately
to observe also, according to the principles taught by the Church, the civil
laws relating to labour and social life;
2° are to pay to those who work for them under
contract a just and honest wage which will be sufficient to provide for their
needs and those of their dependents.
Can. 1287 §1 Where ecclesiastical goods
of any kind are not lawfully withdrawn from the power of governance of the
diocesan Bishop, their administrators, both clerical and lay, are bound to
submit each year to the local Ordinary an account of their administration, which
he is to pass on to his finance committee for examination. Any contrary custom
is reprobated.
§2 Administrators are to render accounts to the
faithful concerning the goods they have given to the Church, in accordance with
the norms to be laid down by particular law.
Can. 1288 Administrators are not to
begin legal proceedings in the name of a public juridical person, nor are they
to contest them in a secular court, without first obtaining the written
permission of their proper Ordinary.
Can. 1289 Although they may not be
bound to the work of administration by virtue of an ecclesiastical office,
administrators may not arbitrarily relinquish the work they have undertaken. If
they do so, and this occasions damage to the Church, they are bound to restitution.
Can. 1290 Without prejudice to can.
1547, whatever the local civil law decrees about contracts, both generally and
specifically, and about the voiding of contracts, is to be observed regarding
goods which are subject to the power of governance of the Church, and with the
same effect, provided that the civil law is not contrary to divine law, and
that canon law does not provide otherwise.
Can. 1291 The permission of the
authority competent by law is required for the valid alienation of goods which,
by lawful assignment, constitute the stable patrimony of a public juridical
person, whenever their value exceeds the sum determined by law.
Can. 1292 §1 Without prejudice to the
provision of can. 638 §3, when the amount of the goods to be alienated is
between the minimum and maximum sums to be established by the Episcopal
Conference for its region, the competent authority in the case of juridical
persons not subject to the diocesan Bishop is determined by the juridical
person’s own statutes. In other cases, the competent authority is the diocesan
Bishop acting with the consent of the finance committee, of the college of
consultors, and of any interested parties. The diocesan Bishop needs the
consent of these same persons to alienate goods which belong to the diocese
itself.
§2 The permission of the Holy See also is required for
the valid alienation of goods whose value exceeds the maximum sum, or if it is
a question of the alienation of something given to the Church by reason of a
vow, or of objects which are precious by reason of their artistic or historical
significance.
§3 When a request is made to alienate goods which are
divisible, the request must state what parts have already been alienated;
otherwise, the permission is invalid.
§4 Those who must give advice about or consent to the
alienation of goods are not to give this advice or consent until they have
first been informed precisely both about the economic situation of the
juridical person whose goods it is proposed to alienate and about alienations
which have already taken place.
Can. 1293 §1 To alienate goods whose
value exceeds the determined minimum sum, it is also required that there be:
1° a just reason, such as urgent necessity, evident
advantage, or a religious, charitable or other grave pastoral reason;
2° a written expert valuation of the goods to be
alienated.
§2 To avoid harm to the Church, any other precautions
drawn up by lawful authority are also to be followed.
Can. 1294 §1 Normally goods must not be
alienated for a price lower than that given in the valuation.
§2 The money obtained from alienation must be
carefully invested for the benefit of the Church, or prudently expended
according to the purposes of the alienation.
Can. 1295 The provisions of cann. 1291‑1294, to which the statutes of juridical
persons are to conform, must be observed not only in alienation, but also in
any dealings in which the patrimonial condition of the juridical person may be
jeopardised.
Can. 1296 When alienation has taken
place without the prescribed canonical formalities, but is valid in civil law,
the competent authority must carefully weigh all the circumstances and decide
whether, and if so what, action is to be taken, namely personal or real, by
whom and against whom, to vindicate the rights of the Church.
Can. 1297 It is the duty of the
Episcopal Conference, taking into account the local circumstances, to determine
norms about the leasing of ecclesiastical goods, especially about permission to
be obtained from the competent ecclesiastical authority.
Can. 1298 Unless they are of little
value, ecclesiastical goods are not to be sold or leased to the administrators
themselves or to their relatives up to the fourth degree of consanguinity or
affinity, without the special written permission of the competent authority.
Can. 1299 §1 Those who by the natural
law and by canon law can freely dispose of their goods may leave them to pious
causes either by an act inter vivos or by an act mortis
causa.
§2 In arrangements mortis
causa in favour of the Church, the formalities of the civil law are as far
as possible to be observed. If these formalities have been omitted, the heirs
must be advised of their obligation to fulfil the intention of the testator.
Can. 1300 The intentions of the
faithful who give or leave goods to pious causes, whether by an act inter vivos or
by an act mortis causa, once lawfully
accepted, are to be most carefully observed, even in the manner of the
administration and the expending of the goods, without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 1301 §3.
Can. 1301 §1 The Ordinary is the
executor of all pious dispositions whether made mortis causa or inter vivos.
§2 By this right the Ordinary can and must ensure,
even by making a visitation, that pious dispositions are fulfilled. Other
executors are to render him an account when they have finished their task.
§3 Any clause contrary to this right of the Ordinary
which is added to a last will, is to be regarded as non‑existent.
Can. 1302 §1 Anyone who receives goods
in trust for pious causes, whether by an act inter vivos or by last will, must inform
the Ordinary about the trust, as well as about the goods in question, both
movable and immovable, and about any obligations attached to them. If the donor
has expressly and totally forbidden this, the trust is not to be accepted.
§2 The Ordinary must demand that goods left in trust
be safely preserved and, in accordance with can. 1301, he must ensure that the
pious disposition is executed.
§3 When goods given in trust to a member of a
religious institute or society of apostolic life, are destined for a particular
place or diocese or their inhabitants, or for pious causes, the Ordinary
mentioned in §§1 and 2 is the local Ordinary. Otherwise, when the person is a
member of a pontifical clerical institute or of a pontifical clerical society
of apostolic life, it is the major Superior; when of other religious
institutes, it is the member’s proper Ordinary.
Can. 1303 §1 In law the term pious
foundation comprises:
1° autonomous pious foundations, that is, aggregates
of things destined for the purposes described in can. 114 §2, and established
as juridical persons by the competent ecclesiastical authority.
2° non‑autonomous pious foundations, that is,
temporal goods given in any way to a public juridical person and carrying with
them a long‑term obligation, such period to be determined by particular
law. The obligation is for the juridical person, from the annual income, to
celebrate Masses, or to perform other determined ecclesiastical functions, or
in some other way to fulfil the purposes mentioned in can. 114 §2.
§2 If the goods of a non‑autonomous pious
foundation are entrusted to a juridical person subject to the diocesan Bishop,
they are, on the expiry of the time, to be sent to the fund mentioned in can.
1274 §1, unless some other intention was expressly manifested by the donor.
Otherwise, the goods fall to the juridical person itself.
Can. 1304 §1 For the valid acceptance of
a pious foundation by a juridical person, the written permission of the
Ordinary is required. He is not to give this permission until he has lawfully
established that the juridical person can satisfy not only the new obligations
to be undertaken, but also any already undertaken. The Ordinary is to take
special care that the revenue fully corresponds to the obligations laid down,
taking into account the customs of the region or place.
§2 Other conditions for the establishment or
acceptance of a pious foundation are to be determined by particular law.
Can. 1305 Money and movable goods
which are assigned as a dowry are immediately to be put in a safe place
approved by the Ordinary, so that the money or the value of the movable goods
is safeguarded; as soon as possible, they are to be carefully and profitably invested
for the good of the foundation, with an express and individual mention of the
obligation undertaken, in accordance with the prudent judgement of the Ordinary
when he has consulted those concerned and his own finance committee.
Can. 1306 §1 All foundations, even if
made orally, are to be recorded in writing.
§2 One copy of the document is to be carefully
preserved in the curial archive and another copy in the archive of the
juridical person to which the foundation pertains.
Can. 1307 §1 When the provisions of cann. 1300‑1302 and 1287 have been observed, a
document showing the obligations arising from the pious foundations is to be
drawn up. This is to be displayed in a conspicuous place, so that the
obligations to be fulfilled are not forgotten.
§2 Apart from the book mentioned in can. 958 §1,
another book is to be kept by the parish priest or rector, in which each of the
obligations, their fulfilment and the offering given, is to be recorded.
Can. 1308 §1 A reduction of the
obligations of Masses, to be made only for a just and necessary cause, is
reserved to the diocesan bishop and to the supreme moderator of a clerical
institute of consecrated life or a society of apostolic life.
§2 With regard to Masses independently founded in
legacies, the diocesan bishop has the power, because of diminished revenues and
for as long as the cause exists, to reduce the obligations to the level of
offering legitimately established in the diocese, provided that there is no one
obliged to increase the offering who can effectively be made to do so.
§3 The diocesan bishop also has the power to reduce
the obligations or legacies of Masses binding an ecclesiastical institute if
the revenue has become insufficient to pursue appropriately the proper purpose
of the institute.
§4 The supreme moderator of a clerical institute of consecrated life or a society of apostolic life possesses the same powers mentioned in §§2 and 3.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
Can. 1309 Where a fitting reason
exists, the authorities mentioned in can. 1308 have the power to transfer Mass
obligations to days, churches or altars other than those determined in the
foundation.
Can. 1310 §1 The ordinary, only for a
just and necessary cause, can reduce, moderate or commute the wills of the
faithful for pious causes, after having heard those concerned and his own
finance council and with the intention of the founder preserved as much as
possible.
§2 In other cases, recourse is to be made to the Apostolic See.
[Revised wording according to m.p. Competentias quasdam decernere, 11.II.2022]
[The whole of
Book VI has been revised by the m.p. Pascite gregem Dei, 23.V.2021]
[See also Dicastery
for Legislative Texts, Penal Sanctions in
the Church (User guide for Book VI of the Code of Canon Law), 2023]
Can. 1311 §1 The Church has its own inherent right to constrain with penal sanctions Christ’s faithful who commit offences.
§2 The one who is at the head of a Church must safeguard and promote the good of the community itself and of each of Christ’s faithful, through pastoral charity, example of life, advice and exhortation and, if necessary, also through the imposition or declaration of penalties, in accordance with the provisions of the law, which are always to be applied with canonical equity and having in mind the restoration of justice, the reform of the offender, and the repair of scandal.
[See m.p. As a loving mother, 4.VI.2016,
concerning removal from office in the case of negligently facilitating acts
that have caused grave harm to others; see also the duties set out in m.p. Vos estis lux mundi, 25.III.2023]
Can. 1312 §1 The penal sanctions in the Church are:
1° medicinal penalties or censures, which are listed in cann. 1331-1333;
2° expiatory penalties, mentioned in can. 1336.
§2 The law may determine other expiatory penalties which deprive a member of Christ’s faithful of some spiritual or temporal good, and are consistent with the Church’s supernatural purpose.
§3 Use is also made of penal remedies and penances, referred to in cann. 1339 and 1340: the former primarily to prevent offences, the latter rather to substitute for or to augment a penalty.
Can. 1313 §1 If a law is changed after an offence has been committed, the law more favourable to the offender is to be applied.
§2 If a later law removes a law, or at least a penalty, the penalty immediately lapses.
Can. 1314 A penalty is ordinarily ferendae sententiae, that is, not binding upon the offender until it has been imposed. It is, however, latae sententiae if the law or precept expressly lays this down, so that it is incurred automatically upon the commission of an offence.
Can. 1315 §1 Whoever has power to issue penal laws may also reinforce a divine law with a fitting penalty.
§2 A lower legislator, taking into account can. 1317, can also:
1° reinforce with a fitting penalty a law issued by a higher authority, observing the limits of his competence in respect of territory or persons;
2° add other penalties to those laid down for a certain offence in a universal law;
3° determine or make obligatory a penalty which a universal law establishes as indeterminate or discretionary.
§3 A law can either itself determine the penalty or leave its determination to the prudent decision of a judge.
Can. 1316 Diocesan Bishops are to take care that as far as possible any penal laws are uniform within the same city or region.
Can. 1317 Penalties are to be established only in so far as they are really necessary for the better maintenance of ecclesiastical discipline. Dismissal from the clerical state, however, cannot be laid down by a lower legislator.
Can. 1318 Latae sententiae penalties are not to be established, except perhaps for some outstanding and malicious offences which may be either more grave by reason of scandal or such that they cannot be effectively punished by ferendae sententiae penalties; censures, however, especially excommunication, are not to be established, except with the greatest moderation, and only for offences of special gravity.
Can. 1319 §1 To the extent to which one can impose precepts by virtue of the power of governance in the external forum in accordance with the provisions of cann. 48-58, to that extent can one also by precept threaten determined penalties, with the exception of perpetual expiatory penalties.
§2 If, after the matter has been very carefully considered, a penal precept is to be imposed, what is established in cann. 1317 and 1318 is to be observed.
Can. 1320 In all matters in which they come under the authority of the local Ordinary, religious can be constrained by him with penalties.
Can. 1321 §1 Any person is considered innocent until the contrary is proved.
§2 No one can be punished unless the commission by him or her of an external violation of a law or precept is gravely imputable by reason of malice or of culpability.
§3 A person who deliberately violated a law or precept is bound by the penalty prescribed in that law or precept. If, however, the violation was due to the omission of due diligence, the person is not punished unless the law or precept provides otherwise.
§4 Where there has been an external violation, imputability is presumed, unless it appears otherwise.
Can. 1322 Those who habitually lack the use of reason, even though they appeared sane when they violated a law or precept, are deemed incapable of committing an offence.
Can. 1323 No one is liable to a penalty who, when violating a law or precept:
1° has not completed the sixteenth year of age;
2° was, without fault, ignorant of violating the law or precept; inadvertence and error are equivalent to ignorance;
3° acted under physical force, or under the impetus of a chance occurrence which the person could not foresee or if foreseen could not avoid;
4° acted under the compulsion of grave fear, even if only relative, or by reason of necessity or grave inconvenience, unless, however, the act is intrinsically evil or tends to be harmful to souls;
5° acted, within the limits of due moderation, in lawful self-defence or defence of another against an unjust aggressor;
6° lacked the use of reason, without prejudice to the provisions of cann. 1324 §1, n. 2 and 1326 §1, n. 4;
7° thought, through no personal fault, that some one of the circumstances existed which are mentioned in nn. 4 or 5.
Can. 1324 §1 The perpetrator of a violation is not exempted from penalty, but the penalty prescribed in the law or precept must be diminished, or a penance substituted in its place, if the offence was committed by:
1° one who had only an imperfect use of reason;
2° one who was lacking the use of reason because of culpable drunkenness or other mental disturbance of a similar kind, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1326 §1, n. 4;
3° one who acted in the heat of passion which, while serious, nevertheless did not precede or hinder all mental deliberation and consent of the will, provided that the passion itself had not been deliberately stimulated or nourished;
4° a minor who has completed the sixteenth year of age;
5° one who was compelled by grave fear, even if only relative, or who acted by reason of necessity or grave inconvenience, if the offence is intrinsically evil or tends to be harmful to souls;
6° one who acted in lawful self-defence or defence of another against an unjust aggressor, but did not observe due moderation;
7° one who acted against another person who was gravely and unjustly provocative;
8° one who erroneously, but culpably, thought that some one of the circumstances existed which are mentioned in can. 1323 nn. 4 or 5;
9° one who through no personal fault was unaware that a penalty was attached to the law or precept;
10° one who acted without full imputability, provided it remained grave.
§2 A judge can do the same if there is any other circumstance present which would reduce the gravity of the offence.
§3 In the circumstances mentioned in §1, the offender is not bound by a latae sententiae penalty, but may have lesser penalties or penances imposed for the purposes of repentance or repair of scandal.
Can. 1325 Ignorance which is crass or supine or affected can never be taken into account when applying the provisions of cann. 1323 and 1324.
Can. 1326 §1 A judge must inflict a more serious punishment than that prescribed in the law or precept when:
1° a person, after being condemned, or after the penalty has been declared, continues so to offend that obstinate ill will may prudently be concluded from the circumstances;
2° a person who is established in some position of dignity, or who, in order to commit a crime, has abused a position of authority or an office;
3° a person who, after a penalty for a culpable offence was constituted, foresaw the event but nevertheless omitted to take the precautions to avoid it which any careful person would have taken;
4° a person who committed an offence in a state of drunkenness or other mental disturbance, if these were deliberately sought so as to commit the offence or to excuse it, or through passion which was deliberately stimulated or nourished.
§2 In the cases mentioned in §1, if the penalty constituted is latae sententiae, another penalty or a penance may be added.
§3 In the same cases, if the penalty constituted is discretionary, it becomes obligatory.
Can. 1327 A particular law may, either as a general rule or for individual offences, determine other excusing, attenuating or aggravating circumstances, over and above the cases mentioned in cann. 1323-1326. Likewise, circumstances may be determined in a precept which excuse from, attenuate or aggravate the penalty constituted in the precept.
Can. 1328 §1 One who in furtherance of an offence did something or failed to do something but then, involuntarily, did not complete the offence, is not bound by the penalty prescribed for the completed offence, unless the law or a precept provides otherwise.
§2 If the acts or the omissions of their nature lead to the carrying out of the offence, the person responsible may be subjected to a penance or to a penal remedy, unless he or she had spontaneously desisted from the offence which had been initiated. However, if scandal or other serious harm or danger has resulted, the perpetrator, even though spontaneously desisting, may be punished by a just penalty, but of a lesser kind than that determined for the completed crime.
Can. 1329 §1 Where a number of persons conspire together to commit an offence, and accomplices are not expressly mentioned in the law or precept, if ferendae sententiae penalties were constituted for the principal offender, then the others are subject to the same penalties or to other penalties of the same or a lesser gravity.
§2 In the case of a latae sententiae penalty attached to an offence, accomplices, even though not mentioned in the law or precept, incur the same penalty if, without their assistance, the crime would not have been committed, and if the penalty is of such a nature as to be able to affect them; otherwise, they can be punished with ferendae sententiae penalties.
Can. 1330 An offence which consists in a declaration or in some other manifestation of will or of doctrine or of knowledge is not to be regarded as effected if no one actually perceives the declaration or manifestation.
Can. 1331 §1 An excommunicated person is prohibited:
1° from celebrating the Sacrifice of the Eucharist and the other sacraments;
2° from receiving the sacraments;
3° from administering sacramentals and from celebrating the other ceremonies of liturgical worship;
4° from taking an active part in the celebrations listed above;
5° from exercising any ecclesiastical offices, duties, ministries or functions;
6° from performing acts of governance.
§2 If a ferendae sententiae excommunication has been imposed or a latae sententiae excommunication declared, the offender:
1° proposing to act in defiance of the provision of §1, nn. 1-4 is to be removed, or else the liturgical action is to be suspended, unless there is a grave reason to the contrary;
2° invalidly exercises any acts of governance which, in accordance with §1, n. 6, are unlawful;
3° is prohibited from benefiting from privileges already granted;
4° does not acquire any remuneration held in virtue of a merely ecclesiastical title;
5° is legally incapable of acquiring offices, duties, ministries, functions, rights, privileges or honorific titles.
Can. 1332 §1 One who is under interdict is obliged by the prohibitions mentioned in can. 1331 §1, nn. 1-4.
§2 A law or precept may however define the interdict in such a way that the offender is prohibited only from certain particular actions mentioned in can. 1331 §1, nn. 1-4, or from certain other particular rights.
§3 The provision of can. 1331 §2, n. 1, is to be observed also in the case of interdict.
Can. 1333 §1 Suspension prohibits:
1° all or some of the acts of the power of order;
2° all or some of the acts of the power of governance;
3° the exercise of all or some of the rights or functions attaching to an office.
§2 In a law or a precept it may be prescribed that, after a judgement or decree which impose or declare the penalty, a suspended person cannot validly perform acts of governance.
§3 The prohibition never affects:
1° any offices or power of governance which are not within the control of the Superior who establishes the penalty;
2° a right of residence which the offender may have by virtue of office;
3° the right to administer goods which may belong to an office held by the person suspended, if the penalty is latae sententiae.
§4 A suspension prohibiting the receipt of benefits, stipends, pensions or other such things, carries with it the obligation of restitution of whatever has been unlawfully received, even though this was in good faith.
Can. 1334 §1 The extent of a suspension, within the limits laid down in the preceding canon, is defined either by the law or precept, or by the judgement or decree whereby the penalty is imposed.
§2 A law, but not a precept, can establish a latae sententiae suspension without an added determination or limitation; such a penalty has all the effects enumerated in can. 1333 §1.
Can. 1335 §1 If the competent authority imposes or declares a censure in a judicial process or by an extra-judicial decree, it can also impose the expiatory penalties it considers necessary to restore justice or repair scandal.
§2 If a censure prohibits the celebration of the sacraments or sacramentals or the performing of acts of the power of governance, the prohibition is suspended whenever this is necessary to provide for the faithful who are in danger of death. If a latae sententiae censure has not been declared, the prohibition is also suspended whenever one of the faithful requests a sacrament or sacramental or an act of the power of governance; for any just reason it is lawful to make such a request.
Can. 1336 §1 Expiatory penalties can affect the offender either for ever or for a determined or an indeterminate period. Apart from others which the law may perhaps establish, they are those enumerated in §§2-5.
§2 An order:
1° to reside in a certain place or territory;
2° to pay a fine or a sum of money for the Church’s purposes, in accordance with the guidelines established by the Episcopal Conference.
§3 A prohibition:
1° against residing in a certain place or territory;
2° against exercising, everywhere or inside or outside a specified place or territory, all or some offices, duties, ministries or functions, or only certain tasks attaching to offices or duties;
3° against performing all or some acts of the power of order;
4° against performing all or some acts of the power of governance;
5° against exercising any right or privilege or using insignia or titles;
6° against enjoying an active or passive voice in canonical elections or taking part with a right to vote in ecclesial councils or colleges;
7° against wearing ecclesiastical or religious dress.
1° of all or some offices, duties, ministries or functions, or only of certain functions attaching to offices or duties;
2° of the faculty of hearing confessions or of preaching;
3° of a delegated power of governance;
4° of some right or privilege or insignia or title;
5° of all ecclesiastical remuneration or part of it, in accordance with the guidelines established by the Episcopal Conference, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1350 §1.
§5 Dismissal from the clerical state.
Can. 1337 §1 A prohibition against residing in a certain place or territory can affect both clerics and religious. An order to reside in a certain place can affect secular clerics and, within the limits of their constitutions, religious.
§2 An order imposing residence in a certain place or territory must have the consent of the Ordinary of that place, unless there is question of a house set up for penance or rehabilitation of clerics, including extra-diocesans.
Can. 1338 §1 The expiatory penalties enumerated in can. 1336 never affect powers, offices, functions, rights, privileges, faculties, favours, titles or insignia, which are not within the control of the Superior who establishes the penalty.
§2 There can be no deprivation of the power of order, but only a prohibition against the exercise of it or of some of its acts; neither can there be a deprivation of academic degrees.
§3 The norm laid down for censures in can. 1335 §2 is to be observed in regard to the prohibitions mentioned in can. 1336 §3.
§4 Only those expiatory penalties enumerated as prohibitions in can. 1336 §3, or others that may perhaps be established by a law or precept, may be latae sententiae penalties.
§5 The prohibitions mentioned in can. 1336 §3 are never under pain of nullity.
Can. 1339 §1 When someone is in a proximate occasion of committing an offence or when, after an investigation, there is a serious suspicion that an offence has been committed, the Ordinary either personally or through another can give that person warning.
§2 In the case of behaviour which gives rise to scandal or serious disturbance of public order, the Ordinary can also correct the person, in a way appropriate to the particular conditions of the person and of what has been done.
§3 The fact that there has been a warning or a correction must always be proven, at least from some document to be kept in the secret archive of the curia.
§4 If on one or more occasions warnings or corrections have been made to someone to no effect, or if it is not possible to expect them to have any effect, the Ordinary is to issue a penal precept in which he sets out exactly what is to be done or avoided.
§5 If the gravity of the case so requires, and especially in a case where someone is in danger of relapsing into an offence, the Ordinary is also to subject the offender, over and above the penalties imposed according to the provision of the law or declared by sentence or decree, to a measure of vigilance determined by means of a singular decree.
Can. 1340 §1 A penance, which can be imposed in the external forum, is the performance of some work of religion or piety or charity.
§2 A public penance is never to be imposed for an occult transgression.
§3 According to his prudent judgement, the Ordinary may add penances to the penal remedy of warning or correction.
Can. 1341 The Ordinary must start a judicial or an administrative procedure for the imposition or the declaration of penalties when he perceives that neither by the methods of pastoral care, especially fraternal correction, nor by a warning or correction, can justice be sufficiently restored, the offender reformed, and the scandal repaired.
Can. 1342 §1 Whenever there are just reasons against the use of a judicial procedure, a penalty can be imposed or declared by means of an extra-judicial decree, observing canon 1720, especially in what concerns the right of defence and the moral certainty in the mind of the one issuing the decree, in accordance with the provision of can. 1608. Penal remedies and penances may in any case whatever be applied by a decree.
§2 Perpetual penalties cannot be imposed or declared by means of a decree; nor can penalties which the law or precept establishing them forbids to be applied by decree.
§3 What the law or decree says of a judge in regard to the imposition or declaration of a penalty in a trial is to be applied also to a Superior who imposes or declares a penalty by an extra-judicial decree, unless it is otherwise clear, or unless there is question of provisions which concern only procedural matters.
Can. 1343 If a law or precept grants the judge the faculty to apply or not to apply a penalty, he is, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1326 §3, to determine the matter according to his own conscience and prudence, and in accordance with what the restoration of justice, the reform of the offender and the repair of scandal require; in such cases the judge may also, if appropriate, modify the penalty or in its place impose a penance.
Can. 1344 Even though the law may use obligatory words, the judge may, according to his own conscience and prudence:
1° defer the imposition of the penalty to a more opportune time, if it is foreseen that greater evils may arise from a too hasty punishment of the offender, unless there is an urgent need to repair scandal;
2° abstain from imposing the penalty or substitute a milder penalty or a penance, if the offender has repented, as well as having repaired any scandal and harm caused, or if the offender has been or foreseeably will be sufficiently punished by the civil authority;
3° may suspend the obligation of observing an expiatory penalty, if the person is a first offender after a hitherto blameless life, and there is no urgent need to repair scandal; this is, however, to be done in such a way that if the person again commits an offence within a time laid down by the judge, then that person must pay the penalty for both offences, unless in the meanwhile the time for prescription of a penal action in respect of the former offence has expired.
Can. 1345 Whenever the offender had only an imperfect use of reason, or committed the offence out of necessity or grave fear or in the heat of passion or, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1326 §1, n. 4, with a mind disturbed by drunkenness or a similar cause, the judge can refrain from inflicting any punishment if he considers that the person’s reform may be better accomplished in some other way; the offender, however, must be punished if there is no other way to provide for the restoration of justice and the repair of any scandal that may have been caused.
Can. 1346 §1 Ordinarily there are as many penalties as there are offences.
§2 Nevertheless, whenever the offender has committed a number of offences and the sum of penalties which should be imposed seems excessive, it is left to the prudent decision of the judge to moderate the penalties in an equitable fashion, and to place the offender under vigilance.
Can. 1347 §1 A censure cannot validly be imposed unless the offender has beforehand received at least one warning to purge the contempt, and has been allowed suitable time to do so.
§2 The offender is said to have purged the contempt if he or she has truly repented of the offence and has made suitable reparation for the scandal and harm, or at least seriously promised to make it.
Can. 1348 When the person has been found not guilty of an accusation, or where no penalty has been imposed, the Ordinary may provide for the person’s welfare and for the common good by opportune warnings or other solicitous means, and even, if the case calls for it, by the use of penal remedies.
Can. 1349 If a penalty is indeterminate, and if the law does not provide otherwise, the judge in determining the penalties is to choose those which are proportionate to the scandal caused and the gravity of the harm; he is not however to impose graver penalties, unless the seriousness of the case really demands it. He may not impose penalties which are perpetual.
Can. 1350 §1 In imposing penalties on a cleric, except in the case of dismissal from the clerical state, care must always be taken that he does not lack what is necessary for his worthy support.
§2 If a person is truly in need because he has been dismissed from the clerical state, the Ordinary is to provide in the best way possible, but not by the conferral of an office, ministry or function.
Can. 1351 A penalty binds an offender everywhere, even when the right of the one who established, imposed or declared it has ceased, unless it is otherwise expressly provided.
Can. 1352 §1 If a penalty prohibits the reception of the sacraments or sacramentals, the prohibition is suspended for as long as the offender is in danger of death.
§2 The obligation of observing a latae sententiae penalty which has not been declared, and is not notorious in the place where the offender actually is, is suspended either in whole or in part to the extent that the offender cannot observe it without the danger of grave scandal or loss of good name.
Can. 1353 An appeal or a recourse against judgements of a court or against decrees which impose or declare any penalty has a suspensive effect.
Can. 1354 §1 Besides those who are enumerated in cann. 1355-1356, all who can dispense from a law which is supported by a penalty, or excuse from a precept which threatens a penalty, can also remit the penalty itself.
§2 Moreover, a law or precept which establishes a penalty can also grant to others the power of remitting the penalty.
§3 If the Apostolic See has reserved the remission of a penalty to itself or to others, the reservation is to be strictly interpreted.
Can. 1355 §1 Provided it is not reserved to the Apostolic See, a penalty established by law which is ferendae sententiae and has been imposed, or which is latae sententiae and has been declared, can be remitted by the following:
1° the Ordinary who initiated the judicial proceedings to impose or declare the penalty, or who by a decree, either personally or through another, imposed or declared it;
2° the Ordinary of the place where the offender actually is, after consulting the Ordinary mentioned in n. 1, unless because of extraordinary circumstances this is impossible.
§2 Provided it is not reserved to the Apostolic See, a penalty established by law which is latae sententiae and has not yet been declared can be remitted by the following:
1° the Ordinary in respect of his subjects;
2° the Ordinary of the place also in respect of those actually in his territory or of those who committed the offence in his territory;
3° any Bishop, but only in the course of sacramental confession.
Can. 1356 §1 A ferendae or a latae sententiae penalty established in a precept not issued by the Apostolic See, can be remitted by the following:
1° the author of the precept;
2° the Ordinary who initiated the judicial proceedings to impose or declare the penalty, or who by a decree, either personally or through another, imposed or declared it;
3° the Ordinary of the place where the offender actually is.
§2 Before the remission is granted, the author of the precept, or the one who imposed or declared the penalty, is to be consulted, unless because of extraordinary circumstances this is impossible.
Can. 1357 §1 Without prejudice to the provisions of cann. 508 and 976, a confessor can in the internal sacramental forum remit a latae sententiae censure of excommunication or interdict which has not been declared, if it is difficult for the penitent to remain in a state of grave sin for the time necessary for the competent Superior to provide.
§2 In granting the remission, the confessor is to impose upon the penitent, under pain of again incurring the censure, the obligation to have recourse within one month to the competent Superior or to a priest having the requisite faculty, and to abide by his instructions. In the meantime, the confessor is to impose an appropriate penance and, to the extent demanded, to require reparation of scandal and harm. The recourse, however, may be made even through the confessor, without mention of a name.
§3 The same duty of recourse, when the danger has ceased, binds those who in accordance with can. 976 have had remitted an imposed or declared censure or one reserved to the Holy See.
Can. 1358 §1 The remission of a censure cannot be granted except to an offender whose contempt has been purged in accordance with can. 1347 §2. However, once the contempt has been purged, the remission cannot be refused, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1361 §4.
§2 The one who remits a censure can make provision in accordance with can. 1348, and can also impose a penance.
Can. 1359 If one is bound by a number of penalties, a remission is valid only for those penalties expressed in it. A general remission, however, removes all penalties, except those which in the petition the offender concealed in bad faith.
Can. 1360 The remission of a penalty extorted by force or grave fear or deceit is invalid by virtue of the law itself.
Can. 1361 §1 A remission can be granted even to a person who is not present, or conditionally.
§2 A remission in the external forum is to be granted in writing, unless a grave reason suggests otherwise.
§3 The petition for remission or the remission itself is not to be made public, except in so far as this would either be useful for the protection of the good name of the offender, or be necessary to repair scandal.
§4 Remission must not be granted until, in the prudent judgement of the Ordinary, the offender has repaired any harm caused. The offender may be urged to make such reparation or restitution by one of the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4; the same applies also when the offender is granted remission of a censure under can. 1358 §1.
Can. 1362 §1 A criminal action is extinguished by prescription after three years, except for:
1° offences reserved to the Congregation* for the Doctrine of the Faith, which are subject to special norms;
[*now Dicastery, following Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022]
2° without prejudice to n. 1, an action arising from any of the offences mentioned in cann. 1376, 1377, 1378, 1393 §1, 1394, 1395, 1397, or 1398 §2, which is extinguished after seven years, or one arising from the offences mentioned in can. 1398 §1, which is extinguished after twenty years;
3° offences not punished by the universal law, where a particular law has prescribed a different period of prescription.
§2 Prescription, unless provided otherwise in a law, runs from the day the offence was committed or, if the offence was enduring or habitual, from the day it ceased.
[In the case of a delict against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue committed by a cleric with a minor below the age of eighteen years or with a person who habitually has imperfect use of reason, prescription begins on the day the minor reaches the age of eighteen: see “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021, art. 8 §2]
§3 When the offender has been summoned in accordance with can. 1723, or informed in the manner provided in can. 1507 §3 of the presentation of the petition of accusation according to can. 1721 §1, prescription of the criminal action is suspended for three years; once this period has expired or the suspension has been interrupted through the cessation of the penal process, time runs once again and is added to the period of prescription which has already elapsed. The same suspension equally applies if, observing can. 1720 n. 1, the procedure is followed for imposing or declaring a penalty by way of an extra-judicial decree.
Can. 1363 §1 An action to execute a penalty is extinguished by prescription if the judge’s decree of execution mentioned in can. 1651 was not notified to the offender within the periods mentioned in can. 1362; these periods are to be reckoned from the day the condemnatory judgement became an adjudged matter.
§2 The same applies, with the necessary adjustments, if the penalty was imposed by an extra-judicial decree.
Can. 1364 §1 An apostate from the faith, a heretic or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication, without prejudice to the provision of can. 194 §1, n. 2; he or she may also be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4.
§2 If a long-standing contempt or the gravity of scandal calls for it, other penalties may be added, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
Can. 1365 A person who, apart from the case mentioned in canon 1364 §1, teaches a doctrine condemned by the Roman Pontiff, or by an Ecumenical Council, or obstinately rejects the teaching mentioned in canon 750 §2 or canon 752 and, when warned by the Apostolic See or the Ordinary, does not retract, is to be punished with a censure and deprivation of office; to these sanctions others mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4 may be added.
Can. 1366 A person who appeals from an act of the Roman Pontiff to an Ecumenical Council or to the College of Bishops is to be punished with a censure.
Can. 1367 Parents and those taking the place of parents who hand over their children to be baptised or brought up in a non-Catholic religion are to be punished with a censure or other just penalty.
Can. 1368 A person is to be punished with a just penalty who, at a public event or assembly, or in a published writing, or by otherwise using the means of social communication, utters blasphemy, or gravely harms public morals, or rails at or excites hatred of or contempt for religion or the Church.
Can. 1369 A person who profanes a sacred object, moveable or immovable, is to be punished with a just penalty.
Can. 1370 §1 A person who uses physical force against the Roman Pontiff incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; if the offender is a cleric, another penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state, may be added according to the gravity of the crime.
§2 One who does this against a Bishop incurs a latae sententiae interdict and, if a cleric, he incurs also a latae sententiae suspension.
§3 A person who uses physical force against a cleric or religious or another of Christ’s faithful out of contempt for the faith, or the Church, or ecclesiastical authority or the ministry, is to be punished with a just penalty.
Can. 1371 §1 A person who does not obey the lawful command or prohibition of the Apostolic See or the Ordinary or Superior and, after being warned, persists in disobedience, is to be punished, according to the gravity of the case, with a censure or deprivation of office or with other penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4.
§2 A person who violates obligations imposed by a penalty is to be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4.
§3 A person who, in asserting or promising something before an ecclesiastical authority, commits perjury, is to be punished with a just penalty.
§4 A person who violates the obligation of observing the pontifical secret is to be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4.
§5 A person who fails to observe the duty to execute an executive sentence is to be punished with a just penalty, not excluding a censure.
§6 A person who neglects to report an offence, when required to do so by a canonical law, is to be punished according to the provision of can. 1336 §§2-4, with the addition of other penalties according to the gravity of the offence.
[See m.p. Vos estis lux mundi, 25.III.2023, arts. 1 §1 b); 3 §1]
Can. 1372 The following are to be punished according to the provision of can. 1336 §§2-4:
1° those who hinder the freedom of the ministry or the exercise of ecclesiastical power, or the lawful use of sacred things or ecclesiastical goods, or who intimidate one who has exercised ecclesiastical power or ministry;
2° those who hinder the freedom of an election or intimidate an elector or one who is elected.
Can. 1373 A person who publicly incites hatred or animosity against the Apostolic See or the Ordinary because of some act of ecclesiastical office or duty, or who provokes disobedience against them, is to be punished by interdict or other just penalties.
Can. 1374 A person who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty; one who promotes or takes office in such an association is to be punished with an interdict.
Can. 1375 §1 Anyone who usurps an ecclesiastical office is to be punished with a just penalty.
§2 The unlawful retention of an office after being deprived of it, or ceasing from it, is equivalent to usurpation.
Can. 1376 §1 The following are to be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4, without prejudice to the obligation of repairing the harm:
1° a person who steals ecclesiastical goods or prevents their proceeds from being received;
2° a person who without the prescribed consultation, consent, or permission, or without another requirement imposed by law for validity or for lawfulness, alienates ecclesiastical goods or carries out an act of administration over them.
§2 The following are to be punished, not excluding by deprivation of office, without prejudice to the obligation of repairing the harm:
1° a person who through grave personal culpability commits the offence mentioned in §1, n. 2;
2° a person who is found to have been otherwise gravely negligent in administering ecclesiastical goods.
Can. 1377 §1 A person who gives or promises something so that someone who exercises an office or function in the Church would unlawfully act or fail to act is to be punished according to the provision of can. 1336 §§2-4; likewise, the person who accepts such gifts or promises is to be punished according to the gravity of the offence, not excluding by deprivation of office, without prejudice to the obligation of repairing the harm.
§2 A person who in the exercise of an office or function requests an offering beyond that which has been established, or additional sums, or something for his or her own benefit, is to be punished with an appropriate monetary fine or with other penalties, not excluding deprivation of office, without prejudice to the obligation of repairing the harm.
Can. 1378 §1 A person who, apart from the cases already foreseen by the law, abuses ecclesiastical power, office, or function, is to be punished according to the gravity of the act or the omission, not excluding by deprivation of the power or office, without prejudice to the obligation of repairing the harm.
§2 A person who, through culpable negligence, unlawfully and with harm to another or scandal, performs or omits an act of ecclesiastical power or office or function, is to be punished according to the provision of can. 1336 §§2-4, without prejudice to the obligation of repairing the harm.
Can. 1379 §1 The following incur a latae sententiae interdict or, if a cleric, also a latae sententiae suspension:
1° a person who, not being an ordained priest, attempts the liturgical celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice;
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
2° a person who, apart from the case mentioned in can. 1384, though unable to give valid sacramental absolution, attempts to do so, or hears a sacramental confession.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
§2 In the cases mentioned in §1, other penalties, not excluding excommunication, can be added, according to the gravity of the offence.
§3 Both a person who attempts to confer a sacred order on a woman, and the woman who attempts to receive the sacred order, incur a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; a cleric, moreover, may be punished by dismissal from the clerical state.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
§4 A person who deliberately administers a sacrament to those who are prohibited from receiving it is to be punished with suspension, to which other penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4 may be added.
§5 A person who, apart from the cases mentioned in §§1-4 and in can. 1384, pretends to administer a sacrament is to be punished with a just penalty.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
Can. 1380 A person who through simony celebrates or receives a sacrament is to be punished with an interdict or suspension or the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4.
Can. 1381 One who is guilty of prohibited participation in religious rites is to be punished with a just penalty.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
Can. 1382 §1 One who throws away the consecrated species or, for a sacrilegious purpose, takes them away or keeps them, incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; a cleric, moreover, may be punished with some other penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.
[An Authentic Interpretation of the former canon 1367, 3.VII.1999, states that this offence includes any voluntarily and gravely contemptuous action towards the sacred species]
§2 A person guilty of consecrating for a sacrilegious purpose one element only or both elements within the Eucharistic celebration or outside it is to be punished according to the gravity of the offence, not excluding by dismissal from the clerical state.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
Can. 1383 A person who unlawfully traffics in Mass offerings is to be punished with a censure or with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4.
Can. 1384 A priest who acts against the prescription of can. 977 incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
Can. 1385 A priest who in confession, or on the occasion or under the pretext of confession, solicits a penitent to commit a sin against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue, is to be punished, according to the gravity of the offence, with suspension, prohibitions and deprivations; in the more serious cases he is to be dismissed from the clerical state.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
Can. 1386 §1 A confessor who directly violates the sacramental seal incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; he who does so only indirectly is to be punished according to the gravity of the offence.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
§2 Interpreters, and the others mentioned in can. 983 §2, who violate the secret are to be punished with a just penalty, not excluding excommunication.
§3 Without prejudice to the provisions of §§1 and 2, any person who by means of any technical device makes a recording of what is said by the priest or by the penitent in a sacramental confession, either real or simulated, or who divulges it through the means of social communication, is to be punished according to the gravity of the offence, not excluding, in the case of a cleric, by dismissal from the clerical state.
[See “Norms on the delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, 11.X.2021]
Can. 1387 Both the Bishop who, without a pontifical mandate, consecrates a person a Bishop, and the one who receives the consecration from him, incur a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.
Can. 1388 §1 A Bishop who, contrary to the provision of can. 1015, ordained someone else’s subject without the lawful dimissorial letters, is prohibited from conferring orders for one year. The person who received the order is ipso facto suspended from the order received.
§2 A person who comes forward for sacred orders bound by some censure or irregularity which he voluntarily conceals is ipso facto suspended from the order received, apart from what is established in canon 1044 §2, n. 1.
Can. 1389 A person who, apart from the cases mentioned in cann. 1379-1388, unlawfully exercises the office of a priest or another sacred ministry, is to be punished with a just penalty, not excluding a censure.
Can. 1390 §1 A person who falsely denounces a confessor of the offence mentioned in can. 1385 to an ecclesiastical Superior incurs a latae sententiae interdict and, if a cleric, he incurs also a suspension.
§2 A person who calumniously denounces some other offence to an ecclesiastical Superior, or otherwise unlawfully injures the good name of another, is to be punished according to the provision of can. 1336 §§2-4, to which moreover a censure may be added.
§3 The calumniator must also be compelled to make appropriate amends.
Can. 1391 The following are to be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4, according to the gravity of the offence:
1° a person who composes a false public ecclesiastical document, or who changes, destroys, or conceals a genuine one, or who uses a false or altered one;
2° a person who in an ecclesiastical matter uses some other false or altered document;
3° a person who, in a public ecclesiastical document, asserts something false.
Can. 1392 A cleric who voluntarily and unlawfully abandons the sacred ministry, for six months continuously, with the intention of withdrawing himself from the competent Church authority, is to be punished, according to the gravity of the offence, with suspension or additionally with the penalties established in can. 1336 §§2-4, and in the more serious cases may be dismissed from the clerical state.
Can. 1393 §1 A cleric or religious who engages in trading or business contrary to the provisions of the canons is to be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4, according to the gravity of the offence.
§2 A cleric or religious who, apart from the cases already foreseen by the law, commits an offence in a financial matter, or gravely violates the stipulations contained in can. 285 §4, is to be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§2-4, without prejudice to the obligation of repairing the harm.
Can. 1394 §1 A cleric who attempts marriage, even if only civilly, incurs a latae sententiae suspension, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 194 §1, n. 3, and 694 §1, n. 2. If, after warning, he has not reformed or continues to give scandal, he must be progressively punished by deprivations, or even by dismissal from the clerical state.
§2 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 694 §1, n. 2, a religious in perpetual vows who is not a cleric but who attempts marriage, even if only civilly, incurs a latae sententiae interdict.
Can. 1395 §1 A cleric living in concubinage, other than in the case mentioned in can. 1394, and a cleric who continues in some other external sin against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue which causes scandal, is to be punished with suspension. To this, other penalties can progressively be added if after a warning he persists in the offence, until eventually he can be dismissed from the clerical state.
§2 A cleric who has offended in other ways against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue, if the offence was committed in public, is to be punished with just penalties, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state if the case so warrants.
§3 A cleric who by force, threats or abuse of his authority commits an offence against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue or forces someone to perform or submit to sexual acts is to be punished with the same penalty as in §2.
[See m.p. Vos estis lux mundi,
25.III.2023, art. 1 §1 a) i]
Can. 1396 A person who gravely violates the obligation of residence to which he is bound by reason of an ecclesiastical office is to be punished with a just penalty, not excluding, after a warning, deprivation of the office.
Can. 1397 §1 One who commits homicide, or who by force or by fraud abducts, imprisons, mutilates or gravely wounds a person, is to be punished, according to the gravity of the offence, with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336. In the case of the homicide of one of those persons mentioned in can. 1370, the offender is punished with the penalties prescribed there and also in §3 of this canon.
§2 A person who actually procures an abortion incurs a latae sententiae excommunication.
[An Authentic Interpretation of the former canon 1398, 23.V.1988, states that abortion in this canon refers to the killing of a foetus in whatever way at whatever time from the moment of conception it may be procured]
[Pope Francis, in no. 12 of his Letter Misericordia et misera, 21.XI.2016, granted all confessors until further notice the faculty to remit the censure arising from the crime of abortion and to absolve sacramentally the sin of abortion]
§3 If offences dealt with in this canon are involved, in more serious cases the guilty cleric is to be dismissed from the clerical state.
Can. 1398 §1 A cleric is to be punished with deprivation of office and with other just penalties, not excluding, where the case calls for it, dismissal from the clerical state, if he:
1° commits an offence against the sixth
commandment of the Decalogue with a minor or with a person who habitually has
an imperfect use of reason or with one to whom the law recognises equal
protection;
2° grooms or induces a minor or a person who
habitually has an imperfect use of reason or one to whom the law recognises
equal protection to expose himself or herself pornographically or to take part
in pornographic exhibitions, whether real or simulated;
3° immorally acquires, retains, exhibits or
distributes, in whatever manner and by whatever technology, pornographic images
of minors or of persons who habitually have an imperfect use of reason.
§2 A member of an institute of consecrated life or of a society of apostolic life, or any one of the faithful who enjoys a dignity or performs an office or function in the Church, who commits an offence mentioned in §1 or in can. 1395 §3 is to be punished according to the provision of can. 1336 §§2-4, with the addition of other penalties according to the gravity of the offence.
[Regarding the offences in this canon see m.p.
Vos estis lux mundi, 25.III.2023, art. 1 §1
a)]
[See also the Dicastery
for the Doctrine of the Faith’s clarification of the concept of “vulnerable
adult”, 30.I.2024]
Can. 1399 Besides the cases prescribed in this or in other laws, the external violation of divine or canon law can be punished, and with a just penalty, only when the special gravity of the violation requires it and necessity demands that scandals be prevented or repaired.
Can. 1400 §1 The objects of a trial are:
1° to pursue or vindicate the rights of physical or
juridical persons, or to declare juridical facts;
2° to impose or to declare penalties in regard to
offences.
§2 Disputes arising from an act of administrative
power, however, can be referred only to the Superior or to an administrative
tribunal.
Can. 1401 The Church has its own and
exclusive right to judge:
1° cases which refer to matters which are spiritual or
linked with the spiritual;
2° the violation of ecclesiastical laws and whatever
contains an element of sin, to determine guilt and impose ecclesiastical
penalties.
Can. 1402 All tribunals of the Church
are governed by the canons which follow, without prejudice to the norms of the
tribunals of the Apostolic See.
Can. 1403 §1 Cases for the canonisation
of the Servants of God are governed by special pontifical law.
§2 The provisions of this Code are also applied to
these cases whenever the special pontifical law remits an issue to the
universal law, or whenever norms are involved which of their very nature apply
also to these cases.
[See John Paul II, Apostolic Constitution Divinus perfectionis magister,
25.I.1983, on the manner of instructing causes;
Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, Norms
to be observed in inquiries made by Bishops in the causes of saints,
7.II.1983;
Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, New
procedures in the rite of beatification, 2005;
Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, Instruction Sanctorum
Mater, 17.V.2007, on the procedure to be followed in carrying out the
diocesan enquiry;
Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, Norms
regarding the Administration of Temporal Goods in the Causes of Beatification
and Canonization, 4.III.2016;
Regulation
of the Medical Board of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, 23.IX.2016;
Francis, Apostolic Letter Maiorem hac dilectionem,
11.VI.2017, on the offer of life as a ground of canonisation;
Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, Instruction Relics
in the Church: Authenticity and Preservation, 5.XII.2017;
Dicastery for the Causes of Saints, Regulation
of the postulators, 11.X.2021, on the role of the postulator in causes;
Francis, Audience
with participants in the Conference promoted by the Dicastery for the Causes of
Saints “There is no greater love. Martyrdom and the offering of life”, 14.XI.2024;
Francis, Letter
for the remembrance in the particular Churches of their own Saints, Blesseds, Venerables and Servants
of God, 16.XI.2024]
Can. 1404 The First See is judged by
no one.
Can. 1405 §1 In the cases mentioned in
can. 1401, the Roman Pontiff alone has the right to judge:
1° Heads of State;
2° Cardinals;
3° Legates of the Apostolic See and, in penal cases,
Bishops
4° other cases which he has reserved to himself.
§2 A judge cannot review an act or instrument which
the Roman Pontiff has specifically confirmed, except by his prior mandate.
§3 It is reserved to the Roman Rota to judge:
1° Bishops in contentious cases, without prejudice to
can. 1419 §2;
2° the Abbot primate or the Abbot superior of a
monastic congregation, and the supreme Moderator of a religious institute of
pontifical right;
3° dioceses and other ecclesiastical persons, physical
or juridical, which have no Superior other than the Roman Pontiff.
Can. 1406 §1 If the provision of can.
1404 is violated, the acts and decisions are invalid.
§2 In the cases mentioned in can. 1405, the non‑competence
of other judges is absolute.
Can. 1407 §1 No one can be brought to
trial in first instance except before a judge who is competent on the basis of
one of the titles determined in cann. 1408‑1414.
§2 The non‑competence of a judge who has none of
these titles is described as relative.
§3 The plaintiff follows the forum of the respondent.
If the respondent has more than one forum, the plaintiff may opt for any one of
them.
Can. 1408 Anyone can be brought to
trial before the tribunal of domicile or quasi‑domicile.
Can. 1409 §1 A person who has not even a
quasi‑domicile has a forum in the place of actual residence.
§2 A person whose domicile, quasi‑domicile or
place of actual residence is unknown, can be brought to trial in the forum of
the plaintiff, provided no other lawful forum is available.
Can. 1410 Competence by reason of
subject matter means that a party can be brought to trial before the tribunal
of the place where the subject matter of the litigation is located, whenever
the action concerns that subject matter directly, or when it is an action for
the recovery of possession.
Can. 1411 §1 Competence by reason of
contract means that a party can be brought to trial before the tribunal of the
place in which the contract was made or must be fulfilled, unless the parties
mutually agree to choose another tribunal.
§2 If the case concerns obligations which arise from
some other title, the party can be brought to trial before the tribunal of the
place in which the obligation arose or in which it is to be fulfilled.
Can. 1412 A person accused in a penal
case can, even though absent, be brought to trial before the tribunal of the
place in which the offence was committed.
Can. 1413 A party can be brought to
trial:
1° in cases concerning administration, before the
tribunal of the place in which the administration was exercised;
2° in cases concerning inheritances or pious legacies,
before the tribunal of the last domicile or quasi‑domicile or residence
of the person whose inheritance or pious legacy is at issue, in accordance with
the norms of cann. 1408‑1409. If, however, only
the execution of the legacy is involved, the ordinary norms of competence are
to be followed.
Can. 1414 Competence by reason of
connection means that cases which are inter‑connected can be heard by one
and the same tribunal and in the same process, unless this is prevented by a
provision of the law.
Can. 1415 Competence by reason of
prior summons means that, if two or more tribunals are equally competent, the
tribunal which has first lawfully summoned the respondent has the right to hear
the case.
Can. 1416 A conflict of competence
between tribunals subject to the same appeal tribunal is to be resolved by the
latter tribunal. If they are not subject to the same appeal tribunal, the
conflict is to be settled by the Apostolic Signatura.
Can. 1417 §1 Because of the primacy of
the Roman Pontiff, any of the faithful may either refer their case to, or
introduce it before, the Holy See, whether the case be contentious or penal.
They may do so at any grade of trial or at any stage of the suit.
§2 Apart from the case of an appeal, a referral to the
Apostolic See does not suspend the exercise of jurisdiction of a judge who has
already begun to hear a case. The judge can, therefore, continue with the trial
up to the definitive judgement, unless the Apostolic See has indicated to him
that it has reserved the case to itself.
Can. 1418 Every tribunal has the
right to call on other tribunals for assistance in instructing a case or in
communicating acts.
Can. 1419 §1 In each diocese and for all
cases which are not expressly excepted in law, the judge of first instance is
the diocesan Bishop. He can exercise his judicial power either personally or
through others, in accordance with the following canons.
§2 If the case concerns the rights or temporal goods
of a juridical person represented by the Bishop, the appeal tribunal is to
judge in first instance.
Can. 1420 §1 Each diocesan Bishop is
obliged to appoint a judicial Vicar, or ‘Officialis’,
with ordinary power to judge. The judicial Vicar is to be a person distinct
from the Vicar general, unless the smallness of the diocese or the limited
number of cases suggests otherwise.
§2 The judicial Vicar constitutes one tribunal with
the Bishop, but cannot judge cases which the Bishop reserves to himself.
§3 The judicial Vicar can be given assistants, who are
called associate judicial Vicars or ‘Vice‑officiales’.
§4 The judicial Vicar and the associate judicial
Vicars must be priests of good repute, with a doctorate or at least a
licentiate in canon law, and not less than thirty years of age.
§5 When the see is vacant, they do not cease from
office, nor can they be removed by the diocesan Administrator. On the coming of
the new Bishop, however, they need to be confirmed in office.
Can. 1421 §1 In each diocese the Bishop
is to appoint diocesan judges, who are to be clerics.
§2 The Episcopal
Conference can permit that lay persons also be appointed judges. Where
necessity suggests, one of these can be chosen in forming a college of Judges.
[The revised canon 1673 §3, following Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, states that in a college of three judges in marriage nullity cases, two of the judges may be laypersons, although the one who presides over the college must be a cleric]
§3 Judges are to be of good repute, and possess a
doctorate, or at least a licentiate, in canon law.
Can. 1422 The judicial Vicar, the
associate judicial Vicars and the other judges are appointed for a specified
period of time, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1420 §5. They cannot
be removed from office except for a lawful and grave reason.
Can. 1423 §1 With the approval of the
Apostolic See, several diocesan Bishops can agree to establish one tribunal of
first instance in their dioceses, in place of the diocesan tribunals mentioned
in cann. 1419-1421. In this case the group of
Bishops, or a Bishop designated by them, has all the powers which the diocesan
Bishop has for his tribunal.
§2 The tribunals mentioned in §1 can be established
for all cases, or for some types of cases only.
Can. 1424 In any trial a sole judge
can associate with himself two assessors as advisers; they may be clerics or
lay persons of good repute.
Can. 1425 §1 The following matters are
reserved to a collegiate tribunal of three judges, any contrary custom being
reprobated:
1° contentious cases: a) concerning the bond of sacred ordination; b) concerning the bond of marriage, without prejudice to the provisions of cann. 1686* and 1688*;
[*Following Mitis Iudex
Dominus Iesus the relevant provisions are now
can. 1688 and can. 1690 respectively]
2° penal cases: a) for offences which can carry the
penalty of dismissal from the clerical state; b) concerning the imposition or
declaration of an excommunication.
§2 The Bishop can entrust the more difficult cases or
those of greater importance to the judgement of three or of five judges.
§3 The judicial Vicar is to assign judges in order by
rotation to hear the individual cases, unless in particular cases the Bishop
has decided otherwise.
§4 In a trial at first instance, if it should happen
that it is impossible to constitute a college of judges, the Episcopal
Conference can for as long as the impossibility persists, permit the Bishop to
entrust cases to a sole clerical judge. Where possible, the sole judge is to
associate with himself an assessor and an auditor.
§5 Once judges have been designated, the judicial
Vicar is not to replace them, except for a very grave reason, which must be
expressed in a decree.
Can. 1426 §1 A collegiate tribunal must
proceed in a collegiate fashion and give its judgement by majority vote.
§2 As far as possible, the judicial Vicar or an
associate judicial Vicar must preside over the collegiate tribunal.
Can. 1427 §1 If there is a controversy
between religious, or houses of the same clerical religious institute of
pontifical right, the judge at first instance, unless the constitutions provide
otherwise, is the provincial Superior or, if an autonomous monastery is concerned,
the local Abbot.
§2 Without prejudice to a different provision in the
constitutions, when a contentious matter arises between two provinces, the
supreme Moderator, either personally or through a delegate, will be the judge
at first instance. If the controversy is between two monasteries, the Abbot
superior of the monastic congregation will be the judge.
§3 Finally, if a controversy arises between physical
or juridical persons of different religious institutes or even of the same
clerical institute of diocesan right or of the same lay institute, or between a
religious person and a secular cleric or a lay person or a non‑religious
juridical person, it is the diocesan tribunal which judges at first instance.
Article 2: Auditors and Relators
Can. 1428 §1 The judge or, in the case
of a collegiate tribunal, the presiding judge, can designate an auditor to
instruct the case. The auditor may be chosen from the tribunal judges, or from
persons approved by the Bishop for this office.
§2 The Bishop can approve clerics or lay persons for
the role of auditor. They are to be persons conspicuous for their good conduct,
prudence and learning.
§3 The task of the auditor is solely to gather the
evidence in accordance with the judge’s commission and, when gathered, to
submit it to the judge. Unless the judge determines otherwise, however, an
auditor can in the meantime decide what evidence is to be collected and the
manner of its collection, should any question arise about these matters while
the auditor is carrying out his role.
Can. 1429 The presiding judge of a
collegiate tribunal is to designate one of the judges of the college as
‘ponens’ or ‘relator’. This person is to present the case at the meeting of the
judges and set out the judgement in writing. For a just reason the presiding
judge can substitute another person in the place of the ‘ponens’.
Article 3: The Promotor of Justice, the Defender of the Bond and the Notary
Can. 1430 A promotor of justice is to
be appointed in the diocese for penal cases, and for contentious cases in which
the public good may be at stake. The promotor is bound by office to safeguard
the public good.
Can. 1431 §1 In contentious cases it is
for the diocesan Bishop to decide whether the public good is at stake or not,
unless the law prescribes the intervention of the promotor of justice, or this
is clearly necessary from the nature of things.
§2 If the promotor of justice has intervened at an
earlier instance of a trial, this intervention is presumed to be necessary at a
subsequent instance.
Can. 1432 A defender of the bond is
to be appointed in the diocese for cases which deal with the nullity of
ordination or the nullity or dissolution of marriage. The defender of the bond
is bound by office to present and expound all that can reasonably be argued against
the nullity or dissolution.
Can. 1433 In cases in which the
presence of the promotor of justice or of the defender of the bond is required,
the acts are invalid if they were not summoned. This does not apply if,
although not summoned, they were in fact present or, having studied the acts, able
to fulfil their role at least before the judgement.
Can. 1434 Unless otherwise expressly
provided:
1° whenever the law directs that the judge is to hear
the parties or either of them, the promotor of justice and the defender of the
bond are also to be heard if they are present;
2° whenever, at the submission of a party, the judge
is required to decide some matter, the submission of the promotor of justice or
of the defender of the bond engaged in the trial has equal weight.
Can. 1435 It is the Bishop’s
responsibility to appoint the promotor of justice and defender of the bond.
They are to be clerics or lay persons of good repute, with a doctorate or a
licentiate in canon law, and of proven prudence and zeal for justice.
Can. 1436 §1 The same person can hold
the office of promotor of justice and defender of the bond, although not in the
same case.
§2 The promotor of justice and the defender of the
bond can be appointed for all cases, or for individual cases. They can be
removed by the Bishop for a just reason.
Can. 1437 §1 A notary is to be present
at every hearing, so much so that the acts are null unless signed by the
notary.
§2 Acts drawn up by notaries constitute public proof.
Can. 1438 Without prejudice to the
provision of can. 1444 §1, n. 1:
1° an appeal from the tribunal of a suffragan Bishop
is to the metropolitan tribunal, without prejudice to the provisions of can.
1439.
2° in cases heard at first instance in the tribunal of
the Metropolitan, the appeal is to a tribunal which the Metropolitan, with the
approval of the Apostolic See, has designated in a stable fashion;
3° for cases dealt with before a provincial Superior,
the tribunal of second instance is that of the supreme Moderator; for cases
heard before the local Abbot, the second instance court is that of the Abbot
superior of the monastic congregation.
Can. 1439 §1 If a single tribunal of
first instance has been constituted for several dioceses, in accordance with
the norm of can. 1423, the Episcopal Conference must, with the approval of the
Holy See, constitute a tribunal of second instance, unless the dioceses are all
suffragans of the same archdiocese.
§2 Even apart from the cases mentioned in §1, the
Episcopal Conference can, with the approval of the Apostolic See, constitute
one or more tribunals of second instance.
§3 In respect of the second instance tribunals
mentioned in §§1‑2, the Episcopal Conference, or the Bishop designated by
it, has all the powers that belong to a diocesan Bishop in respect of his own
tribunal.
Can. 1440 If competence by reason of
the grade of trial, in accordance with the provisions of cann.
1438 and 1439, is not observed, then the non‑competence of the judge is
absolute.
Can. 1441 The tribunal of second
instance is to be constituted in the same way as the tribunal of first
instance. However, if a sole judge has given a judgement in first instance in
accordance with can. 1425 §4, the second instance tribunal is to act
collegially.
Can. 1442 The Roman Pontiff is the
supreme judge for the whole Catholic world. He gives judgement either
personally, or through the ordinary tribunals of the Apostolic See, or through
judges whom he delegates.
Can. 1443 The ordinary tribunal
constituted by the Roman Pontiff to receive appeals is the Roman Rota.
Can. 1444 The Roman Rota judges:
1° in second instance, cases which have been judged by
ordinary tribunals of first instance and have been referred to the Holy See by
a lawful appeal;
2° in third or further instance, cases which have been
processed by the Roman Rota itself or by any other tribunal, unless there is
question of an adjudged matter.
§2 This tribunal
also judges in first instance the cases mentioned in can. 1405 §3, and any
others which the Roman Pontiff, either on his own initiative or at the request
of the parties, has reserved to his tribunal and has entrusted to the Roman
Rota. These cases are judged by the Rota also in second or further instances,
unless the rescript entrusting the task provides otherwise.
[See Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022, arts. 200-204; Normae Romanae Rotae Tribunalis, 18.IV.1994]
Can. 1445 §1 The supreme Tribunal of the
Apostolic Signatura hears:
1° plaints of nullity, petitions for total
reinstatement and other recourses against rotal
judgements;
2° recourses in cases affecting the status of persons,
which the Roman Rota has refused to admit to a new examination;
3° exceptions of suspicion and other cases against
Auditors of the Roman Rota by reason of things done in the exercise of their
office;
4° the conflicts of competence mentioned in can. 1416.
§2 This same Tribunal deals with controversies which
arise from an act of ecclesiastical administrative power, and which are
lawfully referred to it. It also deals with other administrative controversies
referred to it by the Roman Pontiff or by departments of the Roman Curia, and
with conflicts of competence among these departments.
§3 This Supreme Tribunal is also competent:
1° to oversee the proper administration of justice
and, should the need arise, to take notice of advocates and procurators;
2° to extend the competence of tribunals;
3° to promote and
approve the establishment of the tribunals mentioned in cann.
1423 and 1439.
[See Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022, arts. 194-199; m.p. Antiqua ordinatione, 11.VI.2008, arts. 101-103; Circular Letter Inter munera on the state and activity of tribunals, 30.VIII.206; m.p. Munus Tribunalis, 28.II.2024]
Can. 1446 §1 All Christ’s faithful, and
especially Bishops, are to strive earnestly, with due regard for justice, to
ensure that disputes among the people of God are as far as possible avoided,
and are settled promptly and without rancour.
§2 In the early stages of litigation, and indeed at
any other time as often as he discerns any hope of a successful outcome, the
judge is not to fail to exhort and assist the parties to seek an equitable
solution to their controversy in discussions with one another. He is to
indicate to them suitable means to this end and avail himself of serious‑minded
persons to mediate.
§3 If the issue is about the private good of the
parties, the judge is to discern whether an agreement or a judgement by an
arbitrator, in accordance with the norms of cann. 1713-1716,
might usefully serve to resolve the controversy.
Can. 1447 Any person involved in a
case as judge, promotor of justice, defender of the bond, procurator, advocate,
witness or expert cannot subsequently, in another instance, validly determine
the same case as a judge or exercise the role of assessor in it.
Can. 1448 §1 The judge is not to
undertake the hearing of a case in which any personal interest may be involved
by reason of consanguinity or affinity in any degree of the direct line and up
to the fourth degree of the collateral line, or by reason of guardianship or
tutelage, or of close acquaintanceship or marked hostility or possible
financial profit or loss.
§2 The promotor of justice, the defender of the bond,
the assessor and the auditor must likewise refrain from exercising their
offices in these circumstances.
Can. 1449 §1 In the cases mentioned in
can. 1448, if the judge himself does not refrain from exercising his office, a
party may object to him.
§2 The judicial Vicar is to deal with this objection.
If the objection is directed against the judicial Vicar himself, the Bishop in
charge of the tribunal is to deal with the matter.
§3 If the Bishop is the judge and the objection is
directed against him, he is to refrain from judging.
§4 If the objection is directed against the promotor
of justice, the defender of the bond or any other officer of the tribunal, it
is to be dealt with by the presiding judge of a collegial tribunal, or by the
sole judge if there is only one.
Can. 1450 If the objection is upheld,
the persons in question are to be changed, but not the grade of trial.
Can. 1451 §1 The objection is to be
decided with maximum expedition, after hearing the parties, the promotor of
justice or the defender of the bond, if they are engaged in the trial and the
objection is not directed against them.
§2 Acts performed by a judge before being objected to
are valid. Acts performed after the objection has been lodged must be rescinded
if a party requests this within ten days of the admission of the objection.
Can. 1452 §1 In a matter which concerns
private persons exclusively, a judge can proceed only at the request of a
party. In penal cases, however, and in other cases which affect the public good
of the Church or the salvation of souls, once the case has been lawfully
introduced, the judge can and must proceed ex officio.
§2 The judge can also supply for the negligence of the
parties in bringing forward evidence or in opposing exceptions, whenever this
is considered necessary in order to avoid a gravely unjust judgement, without
prejudice to the provisions of can. 1600.
Can. 1453 Judges and tribunals are to
ensure that, within the bounds of justice, all cases are brought to a
conclusion as quickly as possible. They are to see to it that in the tribunal
of first instance cases are not protracted beyond a year, and in the tribunal
of second instance not beyond six months.
Can. 1454 All who constitute a
tribunal or assist in it must take an oath to exercise their office properly
and faithfully.
Can. 1455 §1 In a penal trial, the
judges and tribunal assistants are bound to observe always the secret of the
office; in a contentious trial, they are bound to observe it if the revelation
of any part of the acts of the process could be prejudicial to the parties.
§2 They are also obliged to maintain permanent secrecy
concerning the discussion held by the judges before giving their judgement, and
concerning the various votes and opinions expressed there, without prejudice to
the provisions of can. 1609 §4.
§3 Indeed, the judge can oblige witnesses, experts,
and the parties and their advocates or procurators, to swear an oath to observe
secrecy. This may be done if the nature of the case or of the evidence is such
that revelation of the acts or evidence would put at risk the reputation of
others, or give rise to quarrels, or cause scandal or have any similar untoward
consequence.
Can. 1456 The judge and all who work
in the tribunal are forbidden to accept any gifts on the occasion of a trial.
Can. 1457 §1 Judges can be punished by
the competent authority with appropriate penalties, not excluding the loss of
office, if, though certainly and manifestly competent, they refuse to give
judgement; if, with no legal support, they declare themselves competent and
hear and determine cases; if they breach the law of secrecy; or if, through
deceit or serious negligence, they cause harm to the litigants.
§2 Tribunal officers and assistants are subject to the
same penalties if they fail in their duty as above. The judge also has the
power to punish them.
Can. 1458 Cases are to be heard in
the order in which they were received and entered in the register, unless some
case from among them needs to be dealt with more quickly than others. This is
to be stated in a special decree which gives supporting reasons.
Can. 1459 §1 Defects which can render
the judgement invalid can be proposed as exceptions at any stage or grade of
trial; likewise, the judge can declare such exceptions ex officio.
§2 Apart from the cases mentioned in §1, exceptions
seeking a delay especially those which concern persons and the manner of trial,
are to be proposed before the joinder of the issue, unless they emerge only
after it. They are to be decided as soon as possible.
Can. 1460 §1 If an exception is proposed
against the competence of the judge, the judge himself must deal with the
matter.
§2 Where the exception concerns relative non‑competence
and the judge pronounces himself competent, his decision does not admit of
appeal. However, a plaint of nullity and a total reinstatement are not
prohibited.
§3 If the judge declares himself non‑competent,
a party who complains of being adversely affected can refer the matter within
fifteen canonical days to the appeal tribunal.
Can. 1461 A judge who becomes aware
at any stage of the case that he is absolutely non‑competent, is bound to
declare his non‑competence.
Can. 1462 §1 Exceptions to the effect
that an issue has become an adjudged matter or has been agreed between the
parties, and those other peremptory exceptions which are said to put an end to
the suit, are to be proposed and examined before the joinder of the issue.
Whoever raises them subsequently is not to be rejected, but will be ordered to
pay the costs unless it can be shown that the objection was not maliciously
delayed.
§2 Other peremptory exceptions are to be proposed in
the joinder of the issue and treated at the appropriate time under the rules
governing incidental questions.
Can. 1463 §1 Counter actions can validly
be proposed only within thirty days of the joinder of the issue.
§2 Such counter actions are to be dealt with at the
same grade of trial and simultaneously with the principal action, unless it is
necessary to deal with them separately or the judge considers this procedure
more opportune.
Can. 1464 Questions concerning the
guarantee of judicial expenses or the grant of free legal aid which has been
requested from the very beginning of the process, and other similar matters,
are normally to be settled before the joinder of the issue
Can. 1465 §1 The so‑called
canonical time limits are fixed times beyond which rights cease in law. They
cannot be extended, nor can they validly be shortened except at the request of
the parties.
§2 After hearing the parties, or at their request, the
judge can, for a just reason, extend before they expire times fixed by himself
or agreed by the parties. These times can never validly be shortened without
the consent of the parties.
§3 The judge is to ensure that litigation is not
unduly prolonged by reason of postponement.
Can. 1466 Where the law does not
establish fixed times for concluding procedural actions, the judge is to define
them, taking into consideration the nature of each act.
Can. 1467 If the day appointed for a
judicial action is a holiday, the fixed term is considered to be postponed to
the first subsequent day which is not a holiday.
Can. 1468 As far as possible, the
place where each tribunal sits is to be an established office which is open at
stated times.
Can. 1469 §1 A judge who is forcibly
expelled from his territory or prevented from exercising jurisdiction there,
can exercise his jurisdiction and deliver judgement outside the territory. The
diocesan Bishop is, however, to be informed of the matter.
§2 Apart from the circumstances mentioned in §1, the
judge, for a just reason and after hearing the parties, can go outside his own
territory to gather evidence. This is to be done with the permission of, and in
a place designated by, the diocesan Bishop of the place to which he goes.
Can. 1470 §1 Unless particular law
prescribes otherwise, when cases are being heard before the tribunal, only
those persons are to be present whom the law or the judge decides are necessary
for the hearing of the case.
§2 The judge can with appropriate penalties take to
task all who, while present at a trial, are gravely lacking in the reverence
and obedience due to the tribunal. He can, moreover, suspend advocates and
procurators from exercising their office in ecclesiastical tribunals.
Can. 1471 If a person to be
interrogated uses a language unknown to the judge or the parties, an
interpreter, appointed by the judge and duly sworn, can be employed in the
case. Declarations are to be committed to writing in the original language, and
a translation is to be added. An interpreter is also to be used if a deaf and
dumb person must be interrogated, unless the judge prefers that replies to the
questions he has asked be given in writing.
Can. 1472 §1 Judicial acts must be in
writing, both those which refer to the merits of the case, that is, the acts of
the case, and those which refer to the procedure, that is, the procedural acts.
§2 Each page of the acts is to be numbered and bear a
seal of authenticity.
Can. 1473 Whenever the signature of
parties or witnesses is required in judicial acts, and the party or witness is
unable or unwilling to sign, this is to be noted in the acts. At the same time
the judge and the notary are to certify that the act was read verbatim to the
party or witness, and that the party or witness was either unable or unwilling
to sign.
Can. 1474 §1 In the case of an appeal, a
copy of the acts is to be sent to the higher tribunal, with a certification by
the notary of its authenticity.
§2 If the acts are in a language unknown to the higher
tribunal, they are to be translated into another language known to it. Suitable
precautions are to be taken to ensure that the translation is accurate.
Can. 1475 §1 When the trial has been
completed, documents which belong to private individuals must be returned to
them, though a copy of them is to be retained.
§2 Without an order from the judge, notaries and the
chancellor are forbidden to hand over to anyone a copy of the judicial acts and
documents obtained in the process.
[A decree of the Apostolic Signatura Saepe saepius, 13.VIII.2011, allows, where storage causes grave inconvenience, the destruction of acts of causes concluded over twenty years before, always retaining paper copies of definitive sentences, confirmatory decrees, decisions having the force of definitive sentences, and interlocutory pronouncements: see AAS (103) 2011, 626-628]
Can. 1476 Any person, baptised or
unbaptised, can plead before a court. A person lawfully brought to trial must
respond.
Can. 1477 Even though the plaintiff
or the respondent has appointed a procurator or advocate, each is always bound
to be present in person at the trial when the law or the judge so prescribes.
Can. 1478 §1 Minors and those who lack
the use of reason can stand before the court only through their parents,
guardians or curators, subject to the provisions of §3.
§2 If the judge considers that the rights of minors
are in conflict with the rights of the parents, guardians or curators, or that
these cannot sufficiently protect the rights of the minors, the minors are to
stand before the court through a guardian or curator assigned by the judge.
§3 However, in cases concerning spiritual matters and
matters linked with the spiritual, if the minors have the use of reason, they
can plead and respond without the consent of parents or guardians; indeed, if
they have completed their fourteenth year, they can stand before the court on
their own behalf; otherwise, they do so through a curator appointed by the
judge.
§4 Those barred from the administration of their goods
and those of infirm mind can themselves stand before the court only to respond
concerning their own offences, or by order of the judge. In other matters they
must plead and respond through their curators.
Can. 1479 A guardian or curator
appointed by a civil authority can be admitted by an ecclesiastical judge,
after he has consulted, if possible, the diocesan Bishop of the person to whom
the guardian or curator has been given. If there is no such guardian or curator,
or it is not seen fit to admit the one appointed, the judge is to appoint a
guardian or curator for the case.
Can. 1480 §1 Judicial persons stand
before the court through their lawful representatives.
§2 In a case of absence or negligence of the
representative, the Ordinary himself, either personally or through another, can
stand before the court in the name of juridical persons subject to his
authority.
Can. 1481 §1 A party can freely appoint
an advocate and procurator for him or herself. Apart from the cases stated in
§§2 and 3, however, a party can plead and respond personally, unless the judge
considers the services of a procurator or advocate to be necessary.
§2 In a penal trial the accused must always have an
advocate, either appointed personally or allocated by the judge.
§3 In a contentious trial which concerns minors or the
public good, the judge is ex officio to appoint a legal representative for a
party who lacks one; matrimonial cases are excepted.
Can. 1482 §1 A person can appoint only
one procurator; the latter cannot appoint a substitute, unless this faculty has
been expressly conceded.
§2 If, however, several procurators have for a just
reason been appointed by the same person, these are to be so designated that
there is the right of prior claim among them.
§3 Several advocates can, however, be appointed
together.
Can. 1483 The procurator and advocate
must have attained their majority and be of good repute. The advocate is also
to be a Catholic unless the diocesan Bishop permits otherwise, a doctor in
canon law or otherwise well qualified, and approved by the same Bishop.
Can. 1484 §1 Prior to undertaking their
office, the procurator and the advocate must deposit an authentic mandate with
the tribunal.
§2 To prevent the extinction of a right, however, the
judge can admit a procurator even though a mandate has not been presented; in
an appropriate case, a suitable guarantee is to be given. However, the act
lacks all force if the procurator does not present a mandate within the
peremptory time‑limit to be prescribed by the judge.
Can. 1485 Without a special mandate,
a procurator cannot validly renounce a case, an instance or any judicial act;
nor can a procurator settle an action, bargain, promise to abide by an
arbitrator’s award, or in general do anything for which the law requires a special
mandate.
Can. 1486 §1 For the dismissal of a
procurator or advocate to have effect, it must be notified to them and, if the
joinder of the issue has taken place, the judge and the other party must be
notified of the dismissal.
§2 When a definitive judgement has been given, the
right and duty to appeal lie with the procurator, unless the mandating party
refuses.
Can. 1487 For a grave reason, the
procurator and the advocate can be removed from office by a decree of the judge
given either ex officio or at the request of the party.
Can. 1488 §1 Both the procurator and the
advocate are forbidden to influence a suit by bribery, seek immoderate payment,
or bargain with the successful party for a share of the matter in dispute. If
they do so, any such agreement is invalid and they can be fined by the judge.
Moreover, the advocate can be suspended from office and, if this is not a first
offence, can be removed from the register of advocates by the Bishop in charge
of the tribunal.
§2 The same sanctions can be imposed on advocates and
procurators who fraudulently exploit the law by withdrawing cases from
tribunals which are competent, so that they may be judged more favourably by
other tribunals.
Can. 1489 Advocates and procurators
who betray their office because of gifts or promises, or any other
consideration, are to be suspended from the exercise of their profession, and
be fined or punished with other suitable penalties.
Can. 1490 As far as possible,
permanent advocates and procurators are to be appointed in each tribunal and to
receive a salary from the tribunal. They are to exercise their office,
especially in matrimonial cases, for parties who may wish to choose them.
Can. 1491 Every right is reinforced
not only by an action, unless otherwise expressly provided, but also by an
exception.
Can. 1492 §1 Every action is
extinguished by prescription in accordance with the law, or in any other lawful
way, with the exception of actions bearing on personal status, which are never
extinguished.
§2 Without prejudice to the provision of can. 1462, an
exception is always possible, and is of its nature perpetual.
Can. 1493 A plaintiff can bring
several exceptions simultaneously against another person, concerning either the
same matter or different matters, provided they are not in conflict with one
another, and do not go beyond the competence of the tribunal that has been
approached.
Can. 1494 §1 A respondent can institute
a counter action against a plaintiff before the same judge and in the same
trial, either by reason of the case’s connection with the principal action, or
with a view to removing or mitigating the plaintiff’s plea.
§2 A counter action to a counter action is not
admitted.
Can. 1495 The counter action is to be
proposed to the judge before whom the original action was initiated, even
though he has been delegated for one case only, or is otherwise relatively non‑competent.
Can. 1496 §1 A person who advances
arguments, which are at least probable, to support a right to something held by
another, and to indicate an imminent danger of loss of the object unless it is
handed over for safekeeping, has a right to obtain from the judge the sequestration
of the object in question.
§2 In similar circumstances, a person can obtain a
restraint on another person’s exercise of a right.
Can. 1497 §1 The sequestration of an
object is also allowed for the security of a loan, provided there is sufficient
evidence of the creditor’s right.
§2 Sequestration can also extend to the assets of a
debtor which, on whatever title, are in the keeping of others, as well as to
the loans of the debtor.
Can. 1498 The sequestration of an
object, and restraint on the exercise of a right, can in no way be decreed if
the loss which is feared can be otherwise repaired, and a suitable guarantee is
given that it will be repaired.
Can. 1499 The judge who grants the
sequestration of an object, or the restraint on the exercise of a right, can
first impose on the person to whom the grant is made an undertaking to repay
any loss if the right is not proven.
Can. 1500 In matters concerning the
nature and effect of an action for possession, the provisions of the civil law
of the place where the thing to be possessed is situated, are to be observed.
Can. 1501 A judge cannot investigate
any case unless a plea, drawn up in accordance with canon law, is submitted
either by a person whose interest is involved, or by the promotor of justice.
Can. 1502 A person who wishes to sue
another must present a petition to a judge who is lawfully competent. In this
petition the matter in dispute is to be set out and the intervention of the
judge requested.
Can. 1503 §1 A judge can admit an oral
plea whenever the plaintiff is impeded from presenting a petition or when the
case can be easily investigated and is of minor significance.
§2 In both cases, however, the judge is to direct a
notary to record the matter in writing. This written record is to be read to,
and approved by, the plaintiff, and it takes the place of a petition written by
the plaintiff as far as all effects of law are concerned.
Can. 1504 The petition by which a
suit is introduced must:
1° state the judge before whom the case is being
introduced, what is being sought and from whom it is being sought;
2° indicate on what right the plaintiff bases the case
and, at least in general terms, the facts and evidence to be submitted in
support of the allegations made;
3° be signed by the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s
procurator, and bear the day, the month and the year, as well as the address at
which the plaintiff or the procurator resides, or at which they say they reside
for the purpose of receiving the acts;
4° indicate the domicile or quasi‑domicile of
the respondent.
Can. 1505 §1 Once he has satisfied
himself that the matter is within his competence and the plaintiff has the
right to stand before the court, the sole judge, or the presiding judge of a
collegiate tribunal, must as soon as possible by his decree either admit or reject
the petition.
§2 A petition can be rejected only if:
1° the judge or the tribunal is not legally competent;
2° it is established beyond doubt that the plaintiff
lacks the right to stand before the court;
3° the provisions of can. 1504 nn.
1‑3 have not been observed
4° it is certainly clear from the petition that the
plea lacks any foundation, and that there is no possibility that a foundation
will emerge from a process.
§3 If a petition has been rejected by reason of
defects which can be corrected, the plaintiff can draw up a new petition
correctly and present it again to the same judge.
§4 A party is always entitled, within ten canonical
days, to have recourse, based upon stated reasons, against the rejection of a
petition. This recourse is to be made either to the tribunal of appeal or, if
the petition was rejected by the presiding judge, to the collegiate tribunal. A
question of rejection is to be determined with maximum expedition.
Can. 1506 If within a month of the
presentation of a petition, the judge has not issued a decree admitting or
rejecting it in accordance with can. 1505, the interested party can insist that
the judge perform his duty. If, notwithstanding this, the judge does not respond
within ten days of the party’s request, the petition is to be taken as having
been admitted.
Can. 1507 §1 In the decree by which a
plaintiff’s petition is admitted, the judge or the presiding judge must call or
summon the other parties to court to effect the joinder of the issue; he must
prescribe whether, in order to agree the point at issue, they are to reply in
writing or to appear before him. If, from their written replies, he perceives
the need to convene the parties, he can determine this by a new decree.
§2 If a petition is deemed admitted in accordance with
the provisions of can. 1506, the decree of summons to the trial must be issued
within twenty days of the request of which that canon speaks.
§3 If the litigants in fact present themselves before
the judge to pursue the case, there is no need for a summons; the notary,
however, is to record in the acts that the parties were present at the trial.
Can. 1508 §1 The decree of summons to
the trial must be notified at once to the respondent, and at the same time to
any others who are obliged to appear.
§2 The petition introducing the suit is to be
attached to the summons, unless for grave reasons the judge considers that the
petition is not to be communicated to the other party before he or she gives
evidence.
§3 If a suit is brought against a person who does not
have the free exercise of personal rights, or the free administration of the
matters in dispute, the summons is to be notified to, as the case may be, the
guardian, the curator, the special procurator, or the one who according to law
is obliged to undertake legal proceedings in the name of such a person.
Can. 1509 §1 With due regard to the
norms laid down by particular law, the notification of summonses, decrees,
judgements and other judicial acts is to be done by means of the public postal
service, or by some other particularly secure means.
§2 The fact and the manner of notification must be
shown in the acts.
Can. 1510 A respondent who refuses to
accept a document of summons, or who circumvents the delivery of a summons, is
to be regarded as lawfully summoned.
Can. 1511 Without prejudice to the
provision of can. 1507 §3, if a summons has not been lawfully communicated, the
acts of the process are null.
Can. 1512 Once a summons has been
lawfully communicated, or the parties have presented themselves before a judge
to pursue the case:
1° the matter ceases to be a neutral one;
2° the case becomes that of the judge or of the
tribunal, in other respects lawfully competent, before whom the action was
brought;
3° the jurisdiction of a delegated judge is
established in such a way that it does not lapse on the expiry of the authority
of the person who delegated;
4° prescription is interrupted, unless otherwise
provided;
5° the suit begins to be a pending one, and therefore
the principle immediately applies ‘while a suit is pending, no new element is
to be introduced’.
Can. 1513 §1 The joinder of the issue
occurs when the terms of the controversy, as derived from the pleas and the
replies of the parties, are determined by a decree of the judge.
§2 The pleas and the replies of the parties may be
expressed not only in the petition introducing the suit, but also either in the
response to the summons, or in statements made orally before the judge. In more
difficult cases, however, the parties are to be convened by the judge, so as to
agree the question or questions to which the judgement must respond.
§3 The decree of the judge is to be notified to the
parties. Unless they have already agreed on the terms, they may within ten days
have recourse to the same judge to request that the decree be altered. This
question, however, is to be decided with maximum expedition by a decree of the
judge.
Can. 1514 Once determined, the terms
of the controversy cannot validly be altered except by a new decree, issued for
a grave reason, at the request of the party, and after the other parties have
been consulted and their observations considered.
Can. 1515 Once the joinder of the
issue has occurred, the possessor of another’s property ceases to be in good
faith. If, therefore, the judgement is that he or she return the property, the
possessor must return also any profits accruing from the date of the joinder,
and must compensate for damages.
Can. 1516 Once the joinder of the
issue has occurred, the judge is to prescribe an appropriate time within which
the parties are to present and to complete the evidence.
Can. 1517 The trial of the issue is
initiated by the summons. It is concluded not only by the pronouncement of the
definitive judgement, but also by other means determined by law.
Can. 1518 If a litigant dies, or
undergoes a change in status, or ceases from the office in virtue of which he
or she was acting:
1° if the case has not yet been concluded, the trial
is suspended until the heir of the deceased, or the successor, or a person
whose interest is involved, resumes the suit
2° if the case has been concluded, the judge must
proceed to theremaining steps of the case, having
first summoned the procurator, if there is one, or else the heir or the
successor of the deceased.
Can. 1519 §1 If the guardian or the
curator or the procurator required in accordance with can. 1481 §§1 and 3,
ceases from office, the trial is suspended for the time being.
§2 However, the judge is to appoint another guardian
or curator as soon as possible. He can appoint a procurator ad litem if the
party has neglected to do so within the brief time prescribed by the judge
himself.
Can. 1520 If over a period of six
months, no procedural act is performed by the parties, and they have not been
impeded from doing so, the trial is abated. Particular law may prescribe other
time limits for abatement.
Can. 1521 Abatement takes effect by
virtue of the law itself, and it is effective against everyone, even minors and
those equivalent to minors; moreover, it must be declared even ex officio.
This, however, is without prejudice to the right to claim compensation against
those guardians, curators, administrators and procurators who have not proved
that they were without fault.
Can. 1522 Abatement extinguishes the acts of the process, but not the acts of the case. The acts of the case may indeed be employed in another instance, provided the case is between the same persons and about the same matter. As far as those outside the case are concerned, however these acts have no standing other than as documents.
[According to an Authentic
Interpretation of canons 1522 and 1525, 17.V.1986, if an instance is
finished through abatement or renunciation, it does not have to be resumed in
the forum where it was first dealt with, but can be introduced before another
tribunal which is competent at the time of the resumption]
Can. 1523 When a trial has been
abated, the litigants are to bear the expenses which each has incurred.
Can. 1524 §1 The plaintiff may renounce
a trial at any stage or at any grade. Likewise, both the plaintiff and the
respondent may renounce the acts of the process either in whole or only in
part.
§2 To renounce the trial of an issue, guardians and
administrators of juridical persons must have the advice or the consent of
those whose agreement is required to conduct negotiations which exceed the
limits of ordinary administration.
§3 To be valid, a renunciation must be in writing, and
must be signed either by the party, or by a procurator who has been given a
special mandate for this purpose; it must be communicated to the other party,
who must accept or at least not oppose it; and it must be admitted by the
judge.
Can. 1525 Once a renunciation has been admitted by the judge, it has the same effects for the acts which have been renounced as has an abatement of the trial. Likewise, it obliges the person renouncing to pay the expenses of those acts which have been renounced.
[See Authentic
Interpretation of canons 1522 and 1525, 17.V.1986, mentioned under can.
1522, above]
Can. 1526 §1 The onus of proof rests
upon the person who makes an allegation.
§2 The following matters do not require proof:
1° matters which are presumed by the law itself;
2° facts alleged by one of the litigants and admitted
by the other, unless their proof is nevertheless required either by law or by
the judge.
Can. 1527 §1 Any type of proof which
seems useful for the investigation of the case and is lawful, may be admitted.
§2 If a party submits that proof, which has been
rejected by the judge, should be admitted, the judge is to determine the matter
with maximum expedition.
Can. 1528 If a party or a witness
refuses to testify before the judge, that person may lawfully be heard by
another, even a lay person, appointed by the judge, or asked to make a
declaration either before a public notary or in any other lawful manner.
Can. 1529 Unless there is a grave
reason, the judge is not to proceed to collect the proofs before the joinder of
the issue.
Can. 1530 The judge may always
question the parties the more closely to elicit the truth. He must do so if
requested by one of the parties, or in order to prove a fact which the public
interest requires to be placed beyond doubt.
Can. 1531 §1 A party who is lawfully
questioned is obliged to respond and to tell the whole truth.
§2 If a party has refused to reply, it is for the
judge to evaluate what, as far as the proof of the facts is concerned, can be
deduced therefrom.
Can. 1532 Unless a grave reason
suggests otherwise, in cases in which the public good is at stake the judge is
to administer to the parties an oath that they will tell the truth, or at least
that what they have said is the truth. In other cases, it is left to the
prudent discretion of the judge to determine whether an oath is to be
administered.
Can. 1533 The parties, the promotor
of justice and the defender of the bond may submit to the judge propositions
upon which a party is to be questioned.
Can. 1534 The provisions of cann. 1548 §2, n. 1, 1552 and 1558‑1565 concerning
witnesses are to be observed, with the appropriate qualifications, in the
questioning of the parties.
Can. 1535 A judicial confession is an
assertion of fact against oneself, concerning a matter relevant to the trial,
which is made by a party before a judge who is legally competent; this is so
whether the assertion is made in writing or orally, whether spontaneously or in
response to the judge’s questioning.
Can. 1536 §1 In a private matter and
where the public good is not at stake, a judicial confession of one party
relieves the other parties of the onus of proof.
§2 In cases which concern the public good, however, a
judicial confession, and declarations by the parties which are not confessions,
can have a probative value that is to be weighed by the judge in association
with the other circumstances of the case, but the force of full proof cannot be
attributed to them unless there are other elements which wholly corroborate
them.
Can. 1537 It is for the judge, having
considered all the circumstances, to evaluate the weight to be given to an
extra‑judicial confession which is introduced into the trial.
Can. 1538 A confession, or any other
declaration of a party, is devoid of all force if clearly shown to be based on
an error of fact or to have been extracted by force or grave fear.
Can. 1539 In every type of trial
documentary proof is admitted, whether the documents be public or private.
Article 1: The Nature and Reliability of Documents
Can. 1540 §1 Public ecclesiastical
documents are those which an official person draws up in the exercise of his or
her function in the Church and in which the formalities required by law have
been observed.
§2 Public civil documents are those which are legally
regarded as such in accordance with the laws of each place.
§3 All other documents are private.
Can. 1541 Unless it is otherwise
established by contrary and clear arguments, public documents constitute
acceptable evidence of those matters which are directly and principally
affirmed in them.
Can. 1542 A private document, whether
acknowledged by a party or admitted by a judge, has the same probative force as
an extra‑judicial confession, against its author or the person who has
signed it and against persons whose case rests on that of the author or
signatory. Against others it has the same force as have declarations by the
parties which are not confessions, in accordance with can. 1536 §2.
Can. 1543 If documents are shown to
have been erased, amended, falsified or otherwise tampered with, it is for the
judge to evaluate to what extent, if any, they are to be given credence.
Article 2: The Production of Documents
Can. 1544 Documents do not have
probative force at a trial unless they are submitted in original form or in
authentic copy and are lodged in the office of the tribunal, so that they may
be inspected by the judge and by the opposing party.
Can. 1545 The judge can direct that a
document common to each of the parties is to be submitted in the process.
Can. 1546 §1 No one is obliged to exhibit
documents, even if they are common, which cannot be communicated without danger
of the harm mentioned in can. 1548 §2, n. 2, or without the danger of violating
a secret which is to be observed.
§2 If, however, at least an extract from a document
can be transcribed and submitted in copy without the disadvantages mentioned,
the judge can direct that it be produced in that form.
Can. 1547 Proof by means of
witnesses is admitted in all cases, under the direction of the judge.
Can. 1548 §1 Witnesses must tell the
truth to a judge who lawfully questions them.
§2 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1550
§2, n. 2, the following are exempted from the obligation of replying to
questions:
1° clerics, in those matters revealed to them by reason of their sacred ministry; civil officials, doctors, midwives, advocates, notaries and others who are bound by the secret of their office, even on the ground of having offered advice, in respect of matters subject to this secret;
[Vos estis lux mundi, 25.III.2023, art. 4 §1 states that to make a
report pursuant to art. 3 of the same document shall not constitute a violation
of confidentiality]
2° those who fear that, as a result of giving
evidence, a loss of reputation, dangerous harassment or some other grave evil
will arise for themselves, their spouses, or those related to them by
consanguinity or affinity.
Article 1: Those who can be Witnesses
Can. 1549 Everyone can be a witness,
unless expressly excluded, whether wholly or in part, by the law.
Can. 1550 §1 Minors under the age of
fourteen years and those who are of feeble mind are not admitted to give
evidence. They can, however, be heard if the judge declares by a decree that it
would be appropriate to do so.
§2 The following are deemed incapable of being
witnesses:
1° the parties in the case or those who appear at the
trial in the name of the parties; the judge and his assistant; the advocate and
those others who in the same case assist or have assisted the parties;
2° priests, in respect of everything which has become
known to them in sacramental confession, even if the penitent has asked that
these things be made known. Moreover, anything that may in any way have been
heard by anyone on the occasion of confession, cannot be accepted even as an
indication of the truth.
Article 2: The Introduction and the Exclusion of Witnesses
Can. 1551 A party who has introduced
a witness may forego the examination of that witness, but the opposing party
may ask that the witness nevertheless be examined.
Can. 1552 §1 When proof by means of
witnesses is sought, the names and addresses of the witnesses are to be
communicated to the tribunal.
§2 The propositions on which the interrogation of the
witnesses is requested, are to be submitted within the time‑limit
determined by the judge; otherwise, the request is to be deemed abandoned.
Can. 1553 It is for the judge to curb
an excessive number of witnesses.
Can. 1554 Before witnesses are
examined, their names are to be communicated to the parties. If, in the prudent
opinion of the judge, this cannot be done without great difficulty, it is to be
done at least before the publication of the evidence.
Can. 1555 Without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 1550, a party may request that a witness be excluded,
provided a just reason for exclusion is established before the witness is
examined.
Can. 1556 The summons of a witness is
effected by a decree of the judge lawfully notified to the witness.
Can. 1557 A properly summoned witness
is to appear, or to make known to the judge the reason for being absent.
Article 3: The Examination of Witnesses
Can. 1558 §1 Witnesses are to be
examined at the office of the tribunal unless the judge deems otherwise.
§2 Cardinals, Patriarchs, Bishops, and those who in
their own civil law enjoy a similar favour, are to be heard at the place
selected by themselves.
§3 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1418
and 1469 §2, the judge is to decide where witnesses are to be heard for whom,
by reason of distance, illness or other impediment, it is impossible or
difficult to come to the office of the tribunal.
Can. 1559 The parties cannot be
present at the examination of the witnesses unless, especially when there is
question of a private interest, the judge has determined that they are to be
admitted. Their advocates or procurators, however, may attend, unless by reason
of the circumstances of matter and persons, the judge has determined that the
proceedings are to be in secret.
Can. 1560 §1 The witnesses are to be
examined individually and separately.
§2 If in a grave matter the witnesses disagree either
among themselves or with one of the parties, the judge may arrange for those
who differ to meet or to confront one another, but must, in so far as possible,
eliminate discord and scandal.
Can. 1561 The examination of a
witness is conducted by the judge, or by his delegate or an auditor, who is to
be attended by a notary. Accordingly, unless particular law provides otherwise,
if the parties or the promotor of justice or the defender of the bond or the
advocates who are present at the hearing have additional questions to put to
the witness, they are to propose these not to the witness, but to the judge, or
to the one who is taking the judge’s place, so that he or she may put them.
Can. 1562 §1 The judge is to remind the
witness of the grave obligation to tell the whole truth and nothing but the
truth.
§2 The judge is to administer an oath to the witness
in accordance with can. 1532. If, however, a witness refuses to take an oath,
he or she is to be heard unsworn.
Can. 1563 The judge is first of all
to establish the identity of the witness. The relationship which the witness
has with the parties is to be probed, and when specific questions concerning
the case are asked of the witness enquiry is to be made into the sources of his
or her knowledge and the precise time the witness came to know the matters
which are asserted.
Can. 1564 The questions are to be
brief, and appropriate to the understanding of the person being examined. They
are not to encompass a number of matters at the same time, nor be captious or
deceptive. They are not to be leading questions, nor give any form of offence.
They are to be relevant to the case in question.
Can. 1565 §1 The questions are not to be
made known in advance to the witnesses.
§2 If, however, the matters about which evidence is to
be given are so remote in memory that they cannot be affirmed with certainty
unless they are recalled beforehand, the judge may, if he thinks this can
safely be done, advise the witness in advance about certain aspects of the
matter.
Can. 1566 The witnesses are to give
evidence orally. They are not to read from a script, except where there is a
question of calculations or accounts; in this case, they may consult notes
which they have brought with them.
Can. 1567 §1 The replies are to be
written down at once by the notary. The record must show the very words of the
evidence given, at least in what concerns those things which bear directly on
the matter of the trial.
§2 The use of a tape‑recorder is allowed,
provided the replies are subsequently committed to writing and, if possible,
signed by the deponents.
Can. 1568 The notary is to mention in
the acts whether the oath was taken or excused or refused; who were present,
parties and others; the questions added ex officio; and in general, everything
worthy of record which may have occurred while the witnesses were being
examined.
Can. 1569 §1 At the conclusion of the
examination, the record of the evidence, either as written down by the notary
or as played back from the tape‑recording, must be communicated to the
witness, who is to be given the opportunity of adding to, omitting from,
correcting or varying it.
§2 Finally, the witness, the judge and the notary must
sign the record.
Can. 1570 Before the acts or the
testimony are published, witnesses, even though already examined, may be called
for re‑examination, either at the request of a party or ex officio. This
may be done if the judge considers it either necessary or useful, provided
there is no danger whatever of collusion or of inducement.
Can. 1571 Witnesses must be refunded
both the expenses they incurred and the losses they sustained by reason of
their giving evidence, in accordance with the equitable assessment of the
judge.
Article 4: The Credibility of Evidence
Can. 1572 In weighing evidence the
judge may, if it is necessary, seek testimonial letters, and is to take into
account:
1° the condition and uprightness of the witness
2° whether the knowledge was acquired at first hand,
particularly ifit was something seen or heard
personally, or whether it was opinion, rumour or hearsay;
3° whether the witness is constant and consistent, or
varies, is uncertain or vacillating;
4° whether there is corroboration of the testimony,
and whether it is confirmed or not by other items of evidence.
Can. 1573 The deposition of one
witness cannot amount to full proof, unless the witness is a qualified one who
gives evidence on matters carried out in an official capacity, or unless the
circumstances of persons and things persuade otherwise.
Can. 1574 The services of experts are
to be used whenever, by a provision of the law or of the judge, their study and
opinion, based upon their art or science, are required to establish some fact
or to ascertain the true nature of some matter.
Can. 1575 It is for the judge, after
hearing the opinions or suggestions of the parties, to appoint the experts or,
if such is the case, to accept reports already made by other experts.
Can. 1576 Experts can be excluded or
objected to for the same reasons as witnesses.
Can. 1577 §1 The judge in his decree
must define the specific terms of reference to be considered in the expert’s
task, taking into account whatever may have been gathered from the litigants.
§2 The expert is to be given the acts of the case, and
any documents and other material needed for the proper and faithful discharge
of his or her duty.
§3 The judge, after discussion with the expert, is to
determine a time for the completion of the examination and the submission of
the report.
Can. 1578 §1 Each expert is to complete
a report distinct from that of the others, unless the judge orders that one
report be drawn up and signed by all of them. In this case, differences of
opinion, if there are such, are to be faithfully noted.
§2 Experts must clearly indicate the documents or
other appropriate means by which they have verified the identity of persons,
places or things. They are also to state the manner and method followed in
fulfilling the task assigned to them, and the principal arguments upon which
their conclusions are based.
§3 If necessary, the expert may be summoned by the
judge to supply further explanations.
Can. 1579 §1 The judge is to weigh
carefully not only the expert’s conclusions, even when they agree, but also all
the other circumstances of the case.
§2 When he is giving the reasons for his decision, the
judge must state on what grounds he accepts or rejects the conclusions of the
experts.
Can. 1580 Experts are to be paid
their expenses and honorariums. These are to be determined by the judge in a
proper and equitable manner, with due observance of particular law.
Can. 1581 §1 Parties can designate their
own experts, to be approved by the judge.
§2 If the judge admits them, these experts can inspect
the acts of the case, in so far as required for the discharge of their duty,
and can be present when the appointed experts fulfil their role. They can
always submit their reports.
Can. 1582 If, in order to decide the
case, the judge considers it opportune to visit some place, or inspect some thing, he is to set this out in a decree. After he has
heard the parties, the decree is to give a brief description of what is to be
made available for this access.
Can. 1583 After the inspection has
been carried out, a document concerning it is to be drawn up.
Can. 1584 A presumption is a probable
conjecture about something which is uncertain. Presumptions of law are those
stated in the law; human presumptions are those made by a judge.
Can. 1585 A person with a presumption
of law in his or her favour is freed from the onus of proof, which then falls
on the other party.
Can. 1586 The judge is not to make
presumptions which are not stated in the law, other than on the basis of a
certain and determinate fact directly connected to the matter in dispute.
Can. 1587 An incidental matter arises
when, after the case has begun by the summons, a question is proposed which,
even though not expressly raised in the petition which introduced the case, is
yet so relevant to the case that it needs to be settled before the principal
question.
Can. 1588 An incidental matter is
proposed before the judge who is competent to decide the principal case. It is
raised in writing or orally, indicating the connection between it and the
principal case.
Can. 1589 §1 When the judge has received
the petition and heard the parties, he is to decide with maximum expedition
whether the proposed incidental matter has a foundation in, and a connection
with, the principal matter, or whether it is to be rejected from the outset. If
he admits it he must decide whether it is of such gravity that it needs to be
determined by an interlocutory judgement or by a decree.
§2 If, however, he concludes that the incidental
matter is not to be decided before the definitive judgement, he is to determine
that account be taken of it when the principal matter is decided.
Can. 1590 §1 If the incidental matter is
to be decided by judgement, the norms for a contentious oral process are to be
observed unless, because of the gravity of the issue, the judge deems
otherwise.
§2 If it is to be decided by decree, the tribunal can
entrust the matter to an auditor or to the presiding judge.
Can. 1591 Before the principal matter
is concluded, the judge or the tribunal may for a just reason revoke or alter
an interlocutory judgement or decree. This can be done either at the request of
a party or ex officio by the judge after he has heard the parties.
Can. 1592 §1 If a respondent is summoned
but does not appear, and either does not offer an adequate excuse for absence
or has not replied in accordance with can. 1507 §1, the judge is to declare the
person absent from the process, and decree that the case is to proceed to the
definitive judgement and to its execution, with due observance of the proper
norms.
§2 Before issuing the decree mentioned in §1, the
judge must make sure, if necessary by means of another summons, that a lawful
summons did reach the respondent within the canonical time.
Can. 1593 §1 If the respondent
thereafter appears before the judge, or replies before the trial is concluded,
he or she can bring forward conclusions and proofs, without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 1600; the judge is to take care, however, that the process is
not deliberately prolonged by lengthy and unnecessary delays.
§2 Even if the respondent has neither appeared nor
given a reply before the case is decided, he or she can challenge the
judgement; if the person can show that there was a just reason for being
absent, and that there was no fault involved in not intimating this earlier, a
plaint of nullity can be lodged.
Can. 1594 If the plaintiff does not
appear on the day and at the hour arranged for the joinder of the issue, and
does not offer a suitable excuse:
1° the judge is to summon the plaintiff again;
2° if the plaintiff does not obey the new summons, it
is presumed that the case has been abandoned in accordance with cann. 1524‑1525;
3° if the plaintiff should want to intervene at a
subsequent stage in the process, the provisions of can. 1593 are to be
observed.
Can. 1595 §1 A party, whether plaintiff
or respondent, who is absent from the trial, and who does not establish the
existence of a just impediment, is bound to pay the expenses which have been
incurred in the case because of this absence, and also, if need be, to indemnify
the other party.
§2 If both the plaintiff and the respondent were
absent from the trial, they are jointly bound to pay the expenses of the case.
Can. 1596 §1 Any person with a
legitimate interest can be allowed to intervene in a case in any instance of
the suit, either as a party defending his or her own right or, in an accessory
role, to help one of the litigants.
§2 To be admitted, however, the person must, before
the conclusion of the case, produce to the judge a petition which briefly
establishes the right to intervene.
§3 A person who intervenes in a case is to be admitted
at that stage which the case has reached. If the case has reached the evidence
stage, a brief and peremptory time‑limit is to be assigned within which
to bring forward evidence.
Can. 1597 A third party whose
intervention is seen to be necessary must be called into the case by the judge,
after he has consulted the parties.
Can. 1598 §1 When the evidence has been
assembled, the judge must, under pain of nullity, by a decree permit the
parties and their advocates to inspect at the tribunal office those acts which
are not yet known to them. Indeed, if the advocates so request, a copy of the
acts can be given to them. In cases which concern the public good, however, the
judge can decide that, in order to avoid very serious dangers, some part or
parts of the acts are not to be shown to anyone; he must take care, however,
that the right of defence always remains intact.
§2 To complete the evidence, the parties can propose
other items of proof to the judge. When these have been assembled the judge
can, if he deems it appropriate, again issue a decree as in §1.
Can. 1599 §1 When everything concerned
with the production of evidence has been completed, the conclusion of the case
is reached.
§2 This conclusion occurs when the parties declare
that they have nothing further to add, or when the canonical time allotted by
the judge for the production of evidence has elapsed, or when the judge
declares that he considers the case to be sufficiently instructed.
§3 By whichever way the case has come to its
conclusion, the judge is to issue a decree declaring that it is concluded.
Can. 1600 Only in the following
situations can the judge, after the conclusion of the case, still recall
earlier witnesses or call new ones, or make provision for other evidence not
previously requested:
1° in cases in which only the private good of the
parties is involved if all the parties agree;
2° in other cases, provided that the parties have been
consulted, that a grave reason exists, and that all danger of fraud or
subornation is removed;
3° in all cases, whenever it is probable that, unless
new evidence is admitted, the judgement will be unjust for any of the reasons
mentioned in can. 1645 §2, nn. 1‑3.
§2 The judge can, however, command or permit the
presentation of a document which, even without fault of the interested party,
could not be presented earlier.
§3 New evidence is to be published according to can.
1598 §1.
Can. 1601 When the case has been
concluded, the judge is to determine a suitable period of time for the
presentation of pleadings and observations.
Can. 1602 §1 Pleadings and observations
are to be in writing unless the judge, with the consent of the parties,
considers it sufficient to have a discussion before the tribunal in session.
§2 If the pleadings and the principal documents are to
be printed, the prior permission of the judge is required, and the obligation
of secrecy, where it exists, is still to be observed.
§3 The directions of the tribunal are to be observed
in questions concerning the length of the pleadings, the number of copies and
other similar matters.
Can. 1603 §1 When the pleadings and
observations have been exchanged, each party can make reply within a brief
period of time determined by the judge.
§2 This right is given to the parties once only,
unless for a grave reason the judge considers that the right to a second reply
is to be given; if this right is given to one party, it is to be considered as
given to the other as well.
§3 The promotor of justice and the defender of the
bond have the right to respond to every reply of the parties.
Can. 1604 §1 It is absolutely forbidden
that any information given to the judge by the parties or the advocates, or by
any other persons, be excluded from the acts of the case.
§2 If the pleadings in the case are made in writing,
the judge may, in order to clarify any outstanding issues, order that a
moderate oral discussion be held before the tribunal in session.
Can. 1605 The notary is to be present
at the oral discussion mentioned in cann. 1602 §1 and
1604 §2, so that, if the judge so orders, or the parties so request and the
judge consents, the notary can immediately make a written report of what has
been discussed and concluded.
Can. 1606 If the parties neglect to
prepare their pleadings within the time allotted to them, or if they entrust
themselves to the knowledge and conscience of the judge, and if at the same
time the judge perceives the matter quite clearly from the acts and the proofs,
he can pronounce judgement at once. He must, however, seek the observations of
the promotor of justice and the defender of the bond if they were engaged in
the trial.
Can. 1607 A principal case which has
been dealt with in judicial fashion is decided by the judge by a definitive
judgement. An incidental matter is decided by an interlocutory judgement,
without prejudice to can. 1589
Can. 1608 §1 To give any judgement, the
judge must have in his mind moral certainty about the matter to be decided in
the judgement.
§2 The judge must derive this certainty from the acts
of the case and from the proofs.
§3 The judge must conscientiously weigh the evidence,
with due regard for the provisions of law about the efficacy of certain
evidence.
§4 A judge who cannot arrive at such certainty is to
pronounce that the right of the plaintiff is not established and is to find for
the respondent except in a case which enjoys the favour of law, when he is to
pronounce in its favour.
Can. 1609 §1 The presiding judge of a
collegiate tribunal decides the day and time when it is to meet for discussion.
Unless a special reason requires otherwise, the meeting is to be at the
tribunal office.
§2 On the day appointed for the meeting, the
individual judges are to bring their written conclusions on the merits of the
case, with the reasons in law and in fact for reaching their conclusions. These
conclusions are to be added to the acts of the case and to be kept in secrecy.
§3 Having invoked the divine Name, they are to offer
their conclusions in order, beginning always with the ‘ponens’ or ‘relator’ in
the case, and then in order of precedence. Under the chairmanship of the
presiding judge, they are to hold their discussion principally with a view to
establishing what is to be stated in the dispositive part of the judgement.
§4 In the discussion, each one is permitted to depart
from an original conclusion. A judge who does not wish to accede to the
decision of the others can demand that, if there is an appeal, his or her
conclusions be forwarded to the higher tribunal.
§5 If the judges do not wish, or are unable, to reach
a decision in the first discussion, they can defer their decision to another
meeting, but not beyond one week, unless the instruction of the case has to be
completed in accordance with can. 1600.
Can. 1610 §1 If there is a sole judge,
he will draw up the judgement.
§2 In a collegiate tribunal, the ‘ponens’ or ‘relator’
is to draw up the judgement, using as reasons those tendered by the individual
judges in their discussion, unless the reasons to be preferred have been
defined by a majority of the judges. The judgement must then be submitted to
the individual judges for their approval.
§3 The judgement is to be issued not later than one
month from the day on which the case was decided, unless in a collegiate
tribunal the judges have for grave reasons stipulated a longer time.
Can. 1611 The judgement must:
1° define the controversy raised before the tribunal,
giving appropriate answers to the individual questions;
2° determine the obligations of the parties arising
from the trial and the manner in which these are to be fulfilled
3° set out the reasons or motives, both in law and in
fact, upon which the dispositive part of the judgement is based;
4° apportion the expenses of the suit.
Can. 1612 §1 The judgement, after the
invocation of the divine Name must state in order the judge or tribunal, and
the plaintiff, respondent and procurator, with names and domiciles duly
indicated. It is also to name the promotor of justice and the defender of the bond
if they were engaged in the trial.
§2 It must then briefly set out the alleged facts,
with the conclusions of the parties and the formulation of the doubt.
§3 Then follows the dispositive part of the judgement,
prefaced by the reasons which support it.
§4 It ends with the date and the place in which it was
given, and with the signature of the judge or, in the case of a collegiate
tribunal, of all the judges, and of the notary.
Can. 1613 The rules set out above for
a definitive judgement are to be adapted also to interlocutory judgements.
Can. 1614 A judgement is to be
published as soon as possible, with an indication of the ways in which it can
be challenged. Before publication it has no effect, even if the dispositive
part may, with the permission of the judge, have been notified to the parties.
Can. 1615 The publication or
notification of the judgement can be effected by giving a copy of the judgement
to the parties or to their procurators, or by sending them a copy of it in
accordance with can. 1509.
Can. 1616 §1 A judgement must be
corrected or completed by the tribunal which gave it if, in the text of a
judgement, there is an error in calculations, or a material error in the
transcription of either the dispositive part or the presentation of the facts
or the pleadings of the parties, or if any of the items required by can. 1612 §4
are omitted. This is to be done either at the request of the parties or ex
officio, but always after having consulted the parties and by a decree appended
to the foot of the judgement.
§2 If one party is opposed, an incidental question is
to be decided by a decree.
Can. 1617 Other pronouncements of a
judge apart from the judgement, are decrees. If they are more than mere
directions about procedure, they have no effect unless they give at least a
summary of their reasons or refer to motives expressed in another act.
Can. 1618 An interlocutory judgement
or a decree has the force of a definitive judgement if, in respect of at least
one of the parties, it prevents the trial, or brings to an end the trial itself
or any instance of it.
Can. 1619 Without prejudice to cann. 1622 and 1623, whenever a case concerns the good of
private individuals, acts which are null with a nullity established by positive
law are validated by the judgement itself, if the nullity was known to the
party making the plaint and was not raised with the judge before the judgement.
Can. 1620 A judgement is null with a
nullity which cannot be remedied,
1° it was given by a judge who was absolutely non‑competent;
2° it was given by a person who has no power to judge
in the tribunal in which the case was decided;
3° the judge was compelled by force or grave fear to
deliver judgement;
4° the trial took place without the judicial plea
mentioned in can. 1501, or was not brought against some party as respondent;
5° it was given between parties of whom at least one
has no right to stand before the court;
6° someone acted in another’s name without a lawful
mandate;
7° the right of defence was denied to one or other
party;
8° the controversy has not been even partially
decided.
Can. 1621 In respect of the nullity
mentioned in can. 1620, a plaint of nullity can be made in perpetuity by means
of an exception, or within ten years of the date of publication of the
judgement by means of an action before the judge who delivered the judgement.
Can. 1622 A judgement is null with a
nullity which is simply remediable, if:
1° contrary to the requirements of can. 1425 §1, it
was not given by the lawful number of judges;
2° it does not contain the motives or reasons for the
decision;
3° it lacks the signatures prescribed by the law;
4° it does not contain an indication of the year,
month, day and place it was given;
5° it is founded on a judicial act which is null and
whose nullity has not been remedied in accordance with can. 1619;
6° it was given against a party who, in accordance
with can. 1593 §2, was lawfully absent.
Can. 1623 In the cases mentioned in
can. 1622, a plaint of nullity can be proposed within three months of
notification of the publication of the judgement.
Can. 1624 The judge who gave the
judgement is to consider the plaint of its nullity. If the party fears that the
judge who gave the judgement is biased, and consequently considers him suspect,
he or she can demand that another judge take his place in accordance with can.
1450.
Can. 1625 Within the time limit
established for appeal, a plaint of nullity can be proposed together with the
appeal.
Can. 1626 §1 A plaint of nullity can be
made not only by parties who regard themselves as injured, but also by the
promotor of justice and the defender of the bond, whenever they have a right to
intervene.
§2 Within the time‑limit established in can.
1623, the judge himself can retract or correct an invalid judgement he has
given, unless in the meantime an appeal joined to a plaint of nullity has been
lodged, or the nullity has been remedied by the expiry of the time‑limit
mentioned in can. 1623.
Can. 1627 Cases concerning a plaint
of nullity can be dealt with in accordance with the norms for an oral
contentious process.
Can. 1628 Without prejudice to the
provisions of can. 1629, a party who considers him or herself to be injured by
a judgement has a right to appeal from the judgement to a higher judge; in
cases in which their presence is required, the promotor of justice and the
defender of the bond have likewise the right to appeal.
Can. 1629 No appeal is possible
against:
1° a judgement of the Supreme Pontiff himself, or a
judgement of the Apostolic Signatura;
2° a judgement which is null, unless the appeal is
lodged together with a plaint of nullity, in accordance with can. 1625;
3° a judgement which has become an adjudged matter
4° a decree of the judge or an interlocutory
judgement, which doesnot have the force of a
definitive judgement, unless the appeal is lodged together with an appeal
against the definitive judgement;
5° a judgement or a decree in a case in which the law
requires that the matter be settled with maximum expedition.
Can. 1630 §1 The appeal must be lodged
with the judge who delivered the judgement, within a peremptory time‑limit
of fifteen canonical days from notification of the publication of the
judgement.
§2 If it is made orally, the notary is to draw up the
appeal in writing in the presence of the appellant.
Can. 1631 If a question arises about
the right of appeal, the appeal tribunal is to determine it with maximum
expedition, in accordance with the norms for an oral contentious process.
Can. 1632 §1 If there is no indication
of the tribunal to which the appeal is directed, it is presumed to be made of
the tribunal mentioned in cann. 1438 and 1439.
§2 If the other party has resorted to some other
appeal tribunal, the tribunal which is of the higher grade is to determine the
case, without prejudice to can. 1415.
Can. 1633 The appeal is to be pursued
before the appeal judge within one month of its being forwarded, unless the
originating judge allows the party a longer time to pursue it.
Can. 1634 §1 To pursue the appeal, it is
required and is sufficient that the party request the assistance of the higher
judge to amend the judgement which is challenged, enclosing a copy of the
judgement and indicating the reasons for the appeal.
§2 If the party is unable to obtain a copy of the
appealed judgement from the originating tribunal within the canonical time‑limit,
this timelimit is in the meantime suspended. The
problem is to be made known to the appeal judge, who is to oblige the
originating judge by precept to fulfil his duty as soon as possible.
§3 In the meantime, the originating judge must forward
the acts to the appeal court in accordance with can. 1474.
Can. 1635 The appeal is considered to
be abandoned if the time‑limits for an appeal before either the
originating judge or the appeal judge have expired without action being taken.
Can. 1636 §1 The appellant can renounce
the appeal, with the effects mentioned in can. 1525.
§2 Unless the law provides otherwise, an appeal made
by the defender of the bond or the promotor of justice, can be renounced by the
defender of the bond or the promotor of justice of the appeal tribunal.
Can. 1637 §1 An appeal made by the
plaintiff benefits the respondent, and vice versa.
§2 If there are several respondents or plaintiffs, and
the judgement is challenged by only one of them, or is made against only one of
them, the challenge is considered to be made by all and against all whenever
the thing requested is an individual one or the obligation is a joint one.
§3 If one party challenges a judgement in regard to
one ground, the other party can appeal incidentally on the other grounds, even
if the canonical time‑limit for the appeal has expired. This incidental
case is to be appealed within a peremptory time‑limit of fifteen days
from the day of notification of the principal appeal.
§4 Unless the contrary is clear, an appeal is presumed
to be against all the grounds of the judgement.
Can. 1638 An appeal suspends the
execution of the judgement.
Can. 1639 §1 Without prejudice to the provision of can. 1683*, a new ground cannot be introduced at the appeal grade, not even by way of the useful accumulation of grounds. So the joinder of the issue can concern itself only with the confirmation or the reform of the first judgement, either in part or in whole.
[*Following Mitis Iudex
Dominus Iesus the relevant provision is now
1680 §4]
§2 New evidence is admitted only in accordance with
can. 1600.
Can. 1640 With the appropriate
adjustments, the procedure at the appeal grade is to be the same as in first
instance. Unless the evidence is to be supplemented, however, once the issue
has been joined in accordance with can. 1513 §1 and can. 1639 §1, the judges are
to proceed immediately to the discussion of the case and the judgement.
Can. 1641 Without prejudice to can.
1643, an adjudged matter occurs when:
1° there are two conforming judgements between the
same parties about the same matter and on the same grounds;
2° no appeal was made against the judgement within the
canonical time‑limit;
3° the trial has been abated or renounced in the
appeal grade;
4° a definitive judgement has been given from which,
in accordance with can. 1629, there is no appeal.
Can. 1642 §1 An adjudged matter has the
force of law and cannot be challenged directly, except in accordance with can.
1645 §1.
§2 It has the effect of law between the parties; it
gives the right to an action arising from the judgement and to an exception of
an adjudged matter; to prevent a new introduction of the same case, the judge
can even declare such an exception ex officio.
Can. 1643 Cases concerning the status
of persons never become an adjudged matter, not excepting cases which concern
the separation of spouses.
Can. 1644 §1 If two conforming sentences
have been given in cases concerning the status of persons, recourse to a
tribunal of appeal can be made at any time, to be supported by new and serious
evidence or arguments which are to be submitted within a peremptory time‑limit
of thirty days from the time the challenge was made. Within one month of
receiving the new evidence and arguments, the appeal tribunal must declare by a
decree whether or not a new presentation of the case is to be admitted.
§2 Recourse to a higher tribunal to obtain a new
presentation of the case does not suspend the execution of the judgement,
unless the law provides otherwise or the appeal tribunal orders a suspension in
accordance with can. 1650 §3.
Can. 1645 §1 Against a judgement which
has become an adjudged matter there can be a total reinstatement, provided it
is clearly established that the judgement was unjust.
§2 Injustice is not, however, considered clearly
established unless:
1° the judgement is so based on evidence which is
subsequently shown to be false, that without this evidence the dispositive part
of the judgement could not be sustained;
2° documents are subsequently discovered by which new
facts demanding a contrary decision are undoubtedly proven;
3° the judgement was given through the deceit of one
party to the harm of the other;
4° a provision of a law which was not merely
procedural was evidently neglected;
5° the judgement runs counter to a preceding decision
which has become an adjudged matter.
Can. 1646 §1 Total reinstatement based
on the reasons mentioned in can. 1645 §2, nn. 1‑3,
is to be requested from the judge who delivered the judgement within three
months from the day on which these reasons became known.
§2 Total reinstatement based on the reasons mentioned
in can. 1645 §2, nn. 4 and 5, is to be requested from
the appeal tribunal within three months of notification of the publication of
the judgement. In the case mentioned in can. 1645 §2, n. 5, if the preceding
decision is not known until later, the time‑limit begins at the time the
knowledge was obtained.
§3 The time‑limits mentioned above do not apply
for as long as the aggrieved party is a minor.
Can. 1647 §1 A plea for total
reinstatement suspends the execution of a judgements which has not yet begun.
§2 If there are probable indications leading the judge
to suspect that the plea was made to cause delays in execution, he may decide
that the judgement be executed. The person seeking total reinstatement is,
however, to be given suitable guarantees that, if it is granted, he or she will
be indemnified.
Can. 1648 Where total reinstatement
is granted, the judge must pronounce judgement of the merits of the case.
Can. 1649 §1 The Bishop who is
responsible for governing the tribunal is to establish norms concerning:
1° declarations that parties are liable for the
payment or reimbursement of judicial expenses;
2° the honorariums for advocates, experts and
interpreters, and the expenses of witnesses;
3° the granting of free legal aid and the reduction of
expenses;
4° the payment of damages owed by a person who not
merely lost the case, but was rash in having recourse to litigation;
5° the money to be deposited, or the guarantee to be
given, for the payment of expenses and the compensation of damages.
§2 No distinct appeal exists from a pronouncement
concerning expenses, honorariums and damages. The parties can, however, have
recourse within ten days to the same judge, who can change the sum involved.
Can. 1650 §1 A judgement which becomes
adjudged matter can be executed, without prejudice to the provision of can.
1647.
§2 The judge who delivered the judgement and, if there
has been an appeal, the appeal judge, can either ex officio or at the request
of a party order the provisional execution of a judgement which has not yet
become an adjudged matter, adding if need be appropriate guarantees when it is
a matter of provisions or payments concerning necessary support. They can also
do so for some other just and urgent reason.
§3 If the judgement mentioned in §2 is challenged, the
judge who must deal with the challenge can suspend the execution or subject it
to a guarantee, if he sees that the challenge is probably well founded and that
irreparable harm could result from execution.
Can. 1651 Execution cannot take place
before there is issued the judge’s executing decree directing that the
judgement be executed. Depending on the nature of the case, this decree is to
be either included in the judgement itself or issued separately.
Can. 1652 If the execution of the
judgement requires a prior statement of reasons, this is to be treated as an
incidental question, to be decided by the judge who gave the judgement which is
to be executed.
Can. 1653 §1 Unless particular law
provides otherwise, the Bishop of the diocese in which the first instance
judgement was given must, either personally or through another, execute the
judgement.
§2 If he refuses or neglects to do so, the execution
of the judgement, at the request of an interested party or ex officio, belongs
to the authority to which the appeal tribunal is subject in accordance with
can. 1439 §3.
§3 Between religious, the execution of the judgement
is the responsibility of the Superior who gave the judgement which is to be
executed, or who delegated the judge.
Can. 1654 §1 The executor must execute
the judgement according to the obvious sense of the words, unless in the
judgement itself something is left to his discretion.
§2 He can deal with exceptions concerning the manner
and the force of the execution, but not with the merits of the case. If he has
ascertained from some other source that the judgement is null or manifestly
unjust according to cann. 1620, 1622 and 1645, he is
to refrain from executing the judgement, and is instead to refer the matter to
the tribunal which delivered the judgement and to notify the parties.
Can. 1655 §1 In real actions, whenever
it is decided that a thing belongs to the plaintiff, it is to be handed over to
the plaintiff as soon as the matter has become an adjudged matter.
§2 In personal actions, when a guilty person is
condemned to hand over a movable possession or to pay money, or to give or do
something, the judge in the judgement itself, or the executor according to his
discretion and prudence, is to assign a time limit for the fulfilment of the
obligation. This time‑limit is to be not less than fifteen days nor more
than six months.
Can. 1656 §1 The oral contentious
process dealt with in this section can be used in all cases which are not
excluded by law, unless a party requests an ordinary contentious process.
§2 If the oral process is used in cases other than
those permitted by the law, the judicial acts are null.
Can. 1657 An oral contentious process
in first instance is made before a sole judge, in accordance with can. 1424.
Can. 1658 §1 In addition to the matters
enumerated in can. 1504, the petition which introduces the suit must:
1° set forth briefly, fully and clearly the facts on
which the plaintiff’s pleas are based;
2° indicate the evidence by which the plaintiff
intends to demonstrate the facts and which cannot be brought forward with the
petition; this is to be done in such a way that the evidence can immediately be
gathered by the judge.
§2 Documents which support the plea must be added to
the petition, at least in authentic copy.
Can. 1659 §1 If an attempt at mediation
in accordance with can. 1446 §2 has proven fruitless, the judge, if he deems
that the petition has some foundation, is within three days to add a decree at
the foot of the petition. In this decree he is to order that a copy of the plea
be notified to the respondent, with the right to send a written reply to the
tribunal office within fifteen days.
§2 This notification has the effects of a judicial
summons that are as mentioned in can. 1512.
Can. 1660 If the exceptions raised by
the respondent so require, the judge is to assign the plaintiff a time‑limit
for a reply, so that from the material advanced by each he can clearly discern
the object of the controversy.
Can. 1661 §1 When the time‑limits
mentioned in cann. 1659 and 1660 have expired, the
judge, after examining the acts, is to determine the point at issue. He is then
to summon all who must be present to a hearing, which is to be held within
thirty days; for the parties, he is to add the formulation of the point at
issue.
§2 In the summons the parties are to be informed that,
to support their assertions, they can submit a short written statement to the
tribunal at least three days before the hearing.
Can. 1662 In the hearing, the questions
mentioned in cann. 1459‑1464 are considered
first.
Can. 1663 §1 The evidence is assembled
during the hearing, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1418.
§2 A party and his or her advocate can assist at the
examination of the other parties, of the witnesses and of the experts.
Can. 1664 The replies of the parties,
witnesses and experts, and the pleas and exceptions of the advocates, are to be
written down by the notary in summary fashion, restricting the record to those
things which bear on the substance of the controversy. This record is to be
signed by the persons testifying.
Can. 1665 The judge can admit
evidence which is not alleged or sought in the plea or the reply, but only in
accordance with can. 1452. After the hearing of even one witness, however, the
judge can admit new evidence only in accordance with can. 1600.
Can. 1666 If all the evidence cannot
be collected during the hearing, a further hearing is to be set.
Can. 1667 When the evidence has been
collected, an oral discussion is to take place at the same hearing.
Can. 1668 §1 At the conclusion of the
hearing, the judge can decide the case forthwith, unless it emerges from the
discussion that something needs to be added to the instruction of the case, or
that there is something which prevents a judgement being correctly delivered.
The dispositive part of the judgement is to be read immediately in the presence
of the parties.
§2 Because of the difficulty of the matter, or for
some other just reason the decision of the tribunal can be deferred for up to
five canonical days.
§3 The full text of the judgement, including the
reasons for it, is to be notified to the parties as soon as possible, normally
within fifteen days.
Can. 1669 If the appeal tribunal
discerns that a lower tribunal has used the oral contentious procedure in cases
which are excluded by law, it is to declare the judgement invalid and refer the
case back to the tribunal which delivered the judgement.
Can. 1670 In all other matters
concerning procedure, the provisions of the canons on ordinary contentious
trials are to be followed. In order to expedite matters, however, while
safeguarding justice, the tribunal can, by a decree and for stated reasons,
derogate from procedural norms which are not prescribed for validity.
[cc. 1671-1691
have been revised by the m.p. Mitis
Iudex Dominus Iesus,
15.VIII.2015]
Article 1: The Competent Forum AND TRIBUNALS
The
Competent Forum
Can. 1671 §1 Marriage cases of
the baptized belong to the ecclesiastical judge by proper right.
§2 Cases regarding merely the
civil effects of marriage belong to a civil magistrate, unless the particular
law establishes that such cases, if carried out in an incidental or accessory
manner, can be recognized by and determined by an ecclesiastical judge.
Can. 1672 In cases regarding
the nullity of marriage not reserved to the Apostolic See, the competencies
are: 1° the tribunal of the place in which the marriage was celebrated; 2° the
tribunal of the place in which either or both parties have a domicile or a quasi-domicile;
3° the tribunal of the place in which in fact most of the proofs must be
collected.
Can. 1673 §1 In each diocese, the
judge in first instance for cases of nullity or marriage for which the law does
not expressly make an exception is the diocesan bishop, who can exercise
judicial power personally or through others, according to the norm of law.
§2 The bishop is to establish
a diocesan tribunal for his diocese to handle cases of nullity of marriage
without prejudice to the faculty of the same bishop to approach another nearby
diocesan or interdiocesan tribunal.
§3 Cases of nullity of
marriage are reserved to a college of three judges. A judge who is a cleric
must preside over the college, but the other judges may be laypersons.
§4 The bishop moderator, if a
collegial tribunal cannot be constituted in the diocese or in a nearby tribunal
chosen according to the norm of §2, is to entrust cases to a sole clerical
judge who, where possible, is to employ two assessors of upright life, experts
in juridical or human sciences, approved by the bishop for this task; unless it
is otherwise evident, the same single judge has competency for those things
attributed to the college, the praeses, or the
ponens.
§5 The tribunal of second
instance must always be collegiate for validity, according to the prescript of
the preceding §3.
§6 The tribunal of first
instance appeals to the metropolitan tribunal of second instance without
prejudice to the prescripts of cann. 1438-1439 and
1444.
ARTICLE 2: THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE A MARRIAGE
Can. 1674 §1 The following are
qualified to challenge a marriage: 1° the spouses; 2° the promoter of justice
when nullity has already become public, if the convalidation
of the marriage is not possible or expedient.
§2 A marriage which was not
accused while both spouses were living cannot be accused after the death of
either one or both of the spouses unless the question of validity is
prejudicial to the resolution of another controversy either in the canonical
forum or in the civil forum.
§3 If a spouse dies while the
case is pending, however, can. 1518 is to be observed.
ARTICLE 3: THE INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTION OF THE CASE
Can 1675 The judge, before he
accepts a case, must be informed that the marriage has irreparably failed, such
that conjugal living cannot be restored.
Can. 1676 §1 After receiving the libellus, the judicial vicar, if he considers that it has
some basis, admits it and, by a decree appended to the bottom of the libellus itself, is to order that a copy be communicated to
the defender of the bond and, unless the libellus was
signed by both parties, to the respondent, giving them a period of fifteen days
to express their views on the petition.
§2 After the above-mentioned
deadline has passed, and after the other party has been admonished to express
his or her views if and insofar as necessary, and after the defender of the
bond has been heard, the judicial vicar is to determine by his decree the
formula of the doubt and is to decide whether the case is to be treated with
the ordinary process or with the briefer process according to cann. 1683-1687. This decree is to be communicated
immediately to the parties and the defender of the bond.
§3 If the case is to be
handled through the ordinary process, the judicial vicar, by the same decree,
is to arrange the constitution of a college of judges or of a single judge with
two assessors according to can. 1673 §4.
§4 However, if the briefer
process is decided upon, the judicial vicar proceeds according to the norm of
can. 1685.
§5 The formula of doubt must
determine by which ground or grounds the validity of the marriage is
challenged.
Can. 1677 §1 The defender of the
bond, the legal representatives of the parties, as well as the promoter of
justice, if involved in the trial, have the following rights: 1° to be present
at the examination of the parties, the witnesses, and the experts, without prejudice
to the prescript of can. 1559; 2° to inspect the judicial acts, even those not
yet published, and to review the documents presented by the parties.
§2 The parties cannot be
present at the examination mentioned in §1, n. 1.
Can. 1678 §1 In cases of the
nullity of marriage, a judicial confession and the declarations of the parties,
possibly supported by witnesses to the credibility of the parties, can have the
force of full proof, to be evaluated by the judge after he has considered all
the indications and supporting actors, unless other elements are present which
weaken them.
§2 In the same cases, the
testimony of one witness can produce full proof if it concerns a qualified
witness making a deposition concerning matters done ex officio, or unless the
circumstances of things and persons suggest it.
§3 In cases of impotence or
defect of consent because of mental illness or an anomaly of a psychic nature,
the judge is to use the services of one or more experts unless it is clear from
the circumstances that it would be useless to do so; in other cases the
prescript of can. 1574 is to be observed.
§4 Whenever, during the
instruction of a case, a very probable doubt arises as to whether the marriage
was ever consummated, the tribunal, having heard both parties, can suspend the
case of nullity, complete the instruction for a dispensation super rato, and then transmit the acts to the Apostolic See
together with a petition for a dispensation from either one or both of the
spouses and the votum of the tribunal and the bishop.
ARTICLE 4: THE JUDGEMENT, ITS APPEALS AND ITS EFFECTS
Can. 1679 The sentence that
first declared the nullity of the marriage, once the terms as determined by cann. 1630-1633 have passed, becomes executive.
Can. 1680 §1 The party who
considers himself or herself aggrieved, as well as the promoter of justice and
the defender of the bond, have the right to introduce a complaint of nullity of
the judgement or appeal against the sentence, according to cann.
1619-1640.
§2 After the time limits
established by law for the appeal and its prosecution have passed, and after
the judicial acts have been received by the tribunal of higher instance, a
college of judges is established, the defender of the bond is designated, and the
parties are admonished to put forth their observations within the prescribed
time limit; after this time period has passed, if the appeal clearly appears
merely dilatory, the collegiate tribunal confirms the sentence of the prior
instance by decree.
§3 If an appeal is admitted,
the tribunal must proceed in the same manner as the first instance with the
appropriate adjustments.
§4 If a new ground of nullity
of the marriage is alleged at the appellate level, the tribunal can admit it
and judge it as if in first instance.
Can. 1681 If a sentence has
become effective, one can go at any time to a tribunal of the third level for a
new proposition of the case according to the norm of can. 1644, provided new
and grave proofs or arguments are brought forward within the peremptory time limit
of thirty days from the proposed challenge.
Can. 1682 §1 After the sentence
declaring the nullity of the marriage has become effective, the parties whose
marriage has been declared null can contract a new marriage unless a
prohibition attached to the sentence itself or established by the local
ordinary forbids this.
§2 As soon as the sentence
becomes effective, the judicial vicar must notify the local ordinary of the
place in which the marriage took place. The local ordinary must take care that
the declaration of the nullity of the marriage and any possible prohibitions
are noted as soon as possible in the marriage and baptismal registers.
ARTICLE 5: THE BRIEFER MATRIMONIAL PROCESS BEFORE THE BISHOP
Can. 1683 The diocesan bishop
himself is competent to judge cases of the nullity of marriage with the briefer
process whenever:
1° the petition is proposed by
both spouses or by one of them, with the consent of the other;
2° circumstance of things and
persons recur, with substantiating testimonies and records, which do not demand
a more accurate inquiry or investigation, and which render the nullity
manifest.
Can. 1684 The libellus introducing the briefer process, in addition to
those things enumerated in can. 1504, must: 1° set forth briefly, fully, and
clearly the facts on which the petition is based; 2° indicate the proofs, which
can be immediately collected by the judge; 3° exhibit the documents, in an
attachment, upon which the petition is based.
Can. 1685 The judicial vicar,
by the same decree which determines the formula of the doubt, having named an
instructor and an assessor, cites all who must take part to a session, which in
turn must be held within thirty days according to can. 1686.
Can. 1686 The instructor,
insofar as possible, collects the proofs in a single session and establishes a
time limit of fifteen days to present the observations in favour of the bond
and the defence briefs of the parties, if there are any.
Can. 1687 §1 After he has
received the acts, the diocesan bishop, having consulted with the instructor
and the assessor, and having considered the observations of the defender of the
bond and, if there are any, the defence briefs of the parties, is to issue the
sentence if moral certitude about the nullity of marriage is reached.
Otherwise, he refers the case to the ordinary method.
§2 The full text of the
sentence, with the reasons expressed, is to be communicated to the parties as
swiftly as possible.
§3 An appeal against the
sentence of the bishop is made to the metropolitan or to the Roman Rota; if,
however, the sentence was rendered by the metropolitan, the appeal is made to
the senior suffragan; if against the sentence of another bishop who does not
have a superior authority below the Roman Pontiff, appeal is made to the bishop
selected by him in a stable manner.
§4 If the appeal clearly
appears merely dilatory, the metropolitan or the bishop mentioned in §3, or the
dean of the Roman Rota, is to reject it by his decree at the outset; if the
appeal is admitted, however, the case is remitted to the ordinary method at the
second level.
ARTICLE 6: THE DOCUMENTARY PROCESS
Can. 1688 After receiving a petition proposed according to the norm of can. 1677, the diocesan bishop or the judicial vicar or a judge designated by him can declare the nullity of a marriage by sentence if a document subject to no contradiction or exception clearly establishes the existence of a diriment impediment or a defect of legitimate form, provided that it is equally certain that no dispensation was given, or establishes the lack of a valid mandate of a proxy. In these cases, the formalities of the ordinary process are omitted except for the citation of the parties and the intervention of the defender of the bond.
[According to an Authentic
Interpretation of the former canon 1686 (pre-Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus),
11.VII.1984, the pre-nuptial process in cann.
1066-1067 is sufficient for proving the state of freedom of those who, although
bound to the canonical form, attempted marriage before a civil official or
non-Catholic minister; in such cases the documentary process is not required]
Can. 1689 §1 If the defender of
the bond prudently thinks that either the flaws mentioned in can. 1688 or the
lack of a dispensation are not certain, the defender of the bond must appeal
against the declaration of nullity to the judge of second instance; the acts must
be sent to the appellate judge who must be advised in writing that a
documentary process is involved.
§2 The party who considers
himself or herself aggrieved retains the right of appeal.
Can. 1690 The judge of second
instance, with the intervention of the defender of the bond and after having
heard the parties, will decide in the same manner as that mentioned in can.
1688 whether the sentence must be confirmed or whether the case must rather
proceed according to the ordinary method of law; in the latter event the judge
remands the case to the tribunal of first instance.
ARTICLE 7: GENERAL NORMS
Can. 1691 §1 In the sentence the
parties are to be reminded of the moral and even civil obligations binding them
toward one another and toward their children to furnish support and education.
§2 Cases for the declaration
of the nullity of a marriage cannot be treated in the oral contentious process
mentioned in cann. 1656-1670.
§3 In
other procedural matters, the canons on trials in general and on the ordinary
contentious trial must be applied unless the nature of the matter precludes it;
the special norms for cases concerning the status of persons and cases
pertaining to the public good are to be observed.
[Mitis
Iudex Dominus Iesus adds the following
provisions as “tools for the work
of the tribunals to respond to the needs of the faithful” who seek a
declaration of nullity.
The way of proceeding in cases regarding the
declaration of the nullity of a marriage.
Art. 1. The bishop, under can. 383, §1 is obliged, with an apostolic
spirit, to attend to separated or divorced spouses who perhaps, by the
conditions of their lives, have abandoned religious practice. He thus shares,
together with the parochis (cf. can. 529, §1),
the pastoral solicitude for these faithful in difficulties.
Art. 2. The pre-judicial or pastoral inquiry, which in the context of
diocesan and parish structures receives those separated or divorced faithful
who have doubts regarding the validity of their marriage or are convinced of
its nullity, is, in the end, directed toward understanding their situation and
to gathering the material useful for the eventual judicial process, be it the
ordinary or the briefer one. This inquiry will be developed within the unified
diocesan pastoral care of marriage.
Art. 3. This same inquiry is entrusted to persons deemed suitable by the
local ordinary, with the appropriate expertise, though not exclusively
juridical-canonical. Among them in the first place is the parochus
or the one who prepared the spouses for the wedding celebration. This function
of counseling can also be entrusted to other clerics,
religious or lay people approved by the local ordinary.
One diocese, or several together, according to the present groupings,
can form a stable structure through which to provide this service and, if
appropriate, a handbook (vademecum) containing
the elements essential to the most appropriate way of conducting the inquiry.
Art. 4. The pastoral inquiry will collect elements useful for the
introduction of the case before the competent tribunal either by the spouses or
perhaps by their advocates. It is necessary to discover whether the parties are
in agreement about petitioning nullity.
Art. 5. Once all the elements have been collected, the inquiry
culminates in the libellus, which, if
appropriate, is presented to the competent tribunal.
Art. 6. Since the code of canon law must be applied in all matters,
without prejudice to special norms, even the matrimonial processes in accord
with can.1691, § 3, the present ratio does not intend to explain in
detail a summary of the whole process, but more specifically to illustrate the
main legislative changes and, where appropriate, to complete it.
Title I - The Competent Forums and the Tribunals
Art. 7 § 1. The titles of competence in can. 1672 are the same,
observing in as much as possible the principle of proximity between the judges
and the parties.
§ 2. Through the cooperation between tribunals mentioned in can. 1418,
care is to be taken that everyone, parties or witnesses, can participate in the
process at a minimum of cost.
Art. 8 § 1. In dioceses which lack their own tribunals, the bishop
should take care that, as soon as possible, persons are formed who can
zealously assist in setting up marriage tribunals, even by means of courses in
well-established and continuous institutions sponsored by the diocese or in
cooperation with groupings of dioceses and with the assistance of the Apostolic
See.
§ 2. The bishop can withdraw from an interdiocesan
tribunal constituted in accordance with can. 1423.
Title II - The Right to Challenge a Marriage
Art. 9. If a spouse dies during the process with the case not yet
concluded, the instance is suspended until the other spouse or another person,
who is interested, insists upon its continuation; in this case, a legitimate
interest must be proven.
Title III - The Introduction and Instruction of Cases
Art. 10. The judge can admit an oral petition whenever a party is
prevented from presenting a libellus: however,
the judge himself orders the notary to draw up the act in writing that must be
read to the party and approved, which takes the place of the libellus written by the party for all effects
of law.
Art. 11 § 1. The libellus is presented
to the diocesan or interdiocesan tribunal which has
been chosen according to the norm of can. 1673 § 2.
§ 2. A respondent who remits himself or herself to the justice of the
tribunal, or, when properly cited, once more, makes no response, is deemed not
to object to the petition.
Title IV - The Sentence, Its Appeals and Effect
Art. 12. To achieve the moral certainty required by law, a preponderance
of proofs and indications is not sufficient, but it is required that any
prudent doubt of making an error, in law or in fact, is excluded, even if the
mere possibility of the contrary is not removed.
Art. 13. If a party expressly declares that he or she objects to
receiving any notices about the case, that party is held to have renounced of
the faculty of receiving a copy of the sentence. In this case, that party may
be notified of the dispositive part of the sentence.
Title V - The Briefer Matrimonial Process before the Bishop
Art. 14 § 1. Among the circumstances of things and persons that can
allow a case for nullity of marriage to be handled by means of the briefer
process according to cann. 1683-1687, are included,
for example: the defect of faith which can generate simulation of consent or
error that determines the will; a brief conjugal cohabitation; an abortion
procured to avoid procreation; an obstinate persistence in an extraconjugal relationship at the time of the wedding or
immediately following it; the deceitful concealment of sterility, or grave
contagious illness, or children from a previous relationship, or
incarcerations; a cause of marriage completely extraneous to married life, or
consisting of the unexpected pregnancy of the woman, physical violence
inflicted to extort consent, the defect of the use of reason which is proved by
medical documents, etc.
§ 2. Among the documents supporting this petition are included all
medical records that can clearly render useless the requirement of an ex
officio expert.
Art. 15. If the libellus was presented
to introduce the ordinary process, but the judicial vicar believes the case may
be treated with the briefer process, he is, in the notification of the libellus according to can. 1676, §1, to invite the
respondent who has not signed the libellus to
make known to the tribunal whether he or she intends to enter and take an
interest in the process. As often as is necessary, he invites the party or
parties who have signed the libellus to
complete it as soon as possible according to the norm of can. 1684.
Art. 16. The judicial vicar can designate himself as an instructor; but
to the extent possible, he is to name an instructor from the diocese where the
case originated.
Art. 17. In issuing the citation in accordance with can. 1685, the
parties are informed that, if possible, they are to make available, at least
three days prior to the session for the instruction of the case, those specific
points of the matter upon which the parties or the witnesses are to be
questioned, unless they are attached to the libellus.
Art. 18. § 1. The parties and their advocates can be present for the
examination of other parties and witnesses unless the instructor, on account of
circumstances of things and persons, decides to proceed otherwise.
§ 2. The responses of the parties and witnesses are to be rendered in
writing by the notary, but in a summary way and only that which refers to the
substance of the disputed marriage.
Art. 19. If the case is instructed at an interdiocesan
tribunal, the bishop who is to pronounce the sentence is the one of that place
according to the competence established in accordance with can. 1672. If there
are several, the principle of proximity between the parties and the judge is
observed as far as possible.
Art. 20 § 1. The diocesan bishop determines according to his own
prudence the way in which to pronounce the sentence.
§ 2. The sentence which is signed by the bishop and certified by the
notary, briefly and concisely explains the reasons for the decision and
ordinarily the parties are notified within one month of the day of the
decision.
Title VI - The Documentary Process
Art. 21. The competent diocesan bishop and the judicial vicar are
determined in accordance with can. 1672.]
Can. 1692 §1 Unless lawfully provided
otherwise in particular places, the personal separation of baptised spouses can
be decided by a decree of the diocesan Bishop, or by the judgement of a judge
in accordance with the following canons.
§2 Where the ecclesiastical decision does not produce
civil effects, or if it is foreseen that there will be a civil judgement not
contrary to the divine law, the Bishop of the diocese in which the spouses are
living can, in the light of their particular circumstances, give them
permission to approach the civil courts.
§3 If the case is also concerned with the merely civil
effects of marriage, the judge is to endeavour, without prejudice to the
provision of §2, to have the case brought before the civil court from the very
beginning.
Can. 1693 §1 The oral contentious
process is to be used, unless either party or the promotor of justice requests
the ordinary contentious process.
§2 If the ordinary contentious process is used and there is an appeal, the tribunal of second instance is to proceed in accordance with can. 1682 §2*, observing what has to be observed.
[*Following Mitis Iudex
Dominus Iesus the relevant provision is now can.
1680]
Can. 1694 In matters concerning the competence of the tribunal, the provisions of can. 1673* are to be observed.
[*Following Mitis Iudex
Dominus Iesus the relevant provision is now can.
1672]
Can. 1695 Before he accepts the case,
and whenever there appears to be hope of success, the judge is to use pastoral
means to induce the parties to be reconciled and to resume their conjugal life.
Can. 1696 Cases of separation of
spouses also concern the public good; the promotor of justice must, therefore,
always intervene, in accordance with can. 1433.
Can. 1697 The parties alone, or
indeed one of them even if the other is unwilling, have the right to seek the
favour of a dispensation from a ratified and non‑consummated marriage.
Can. 1698 §1 Only the Apostolic See
gives judgement on the fact of the non‑consummation of a marriage and on
the existence of a just reason for granting the dispensation.
§2 The dispensation, however, is given by the Roman
Pontiff alone.
Can. 1699 §1 The diocesan Bishop of the
place of domicile or quasidomicile of the petitioner
is competent to accept the petition seeking the dispensation. If the request is
well founded, he must arrange for the instruction of the process.
§2 If, however, the proposed case has special
difficulties of a juridical or moral order, the diocesan Bishop is to consult
the Apostolic See.
§3 Recourse to the Apostolic See is available against
the decree of a Bishop who rejects the petition.
Can. 1700 §1 Without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1681*, the Bishop is to assign the instruction of these processes, in a stable manner or case by case, to his own tribunal or to that of another diocese, or to a suitable priest.
[*Following Mitis Iudex
Dominus Iesus the relevant provision is now can.
1678 §4]
§2 If, however, a
judicial plea has been introduced to declare the nullity of the same marriage,
the instruction of the process is to be assigned to the same tribunal.
Can. 1701 §1 In these processes the
defender of the bond must always intervene.
§2 An advocate is not admitted, but the Bishop can,
because of the difficulty of a case, allow the petitioner or respondent to have
the assistance of an expert in the law.
Can. 1702 In the instruction of the
process both parties are to be heard. As far as possible, and provided they can
be reconciled with the nature of these processes, the canons concerning the
collection of evidence in the ordinary contentious process and in cases of
nullity of marriage are to be followed.
Can. 1703 §1 There is no publication of
the acts, but if the judge sees that, because of the evidence tendered, a
serious obstacle stands in the way of the plea of the petitioner or the
exception of the respondent, he can prudently make it known to the party
concerned.
§2 To the party requesting it the judge can show a
document which has been presented or evidence which has been received, and he
can set a time for the production of arguments.
Can. 1704 §1 When the instruction is
completed, the judge instructor is to give all the acts, together with a
suitable report, to the Bishop. The Bishop is to express his Opinion on the
merits of the case in relation to the alleged fact of non‑consummation,
the adequacy of the reason for dispensation, and the opportuneness of the
favour.
§2 If the instruction of the process has been
entrusted to another tribunal in accordance with can. 1700, the observations in
favour of the bond of marriage are to be prepared in that same tribunal. The
Opinion spoken of in §1 is, however, the province of the Bishop who gave the
commission and the judge instructor is to give him, together with the acts, a
suitable report on the case.
Can. 1705 §1 The Bishop is to transmit
all the acts to the Apostolic See together with his Opinion and the
observations of the defender of the bond.
§2 If, in the judgement of the Apostolic See, a
supplementary instruction is required, this will be notified to the Bishop,
with a statement of the items on which the acts are to be supplemented.
§3 If, however, the answer of the Apostolic See is
that the non‑consummation is not proven from the evidence produced, then
the expert in law mentioned in can. 1701 §2 can inspect the acts of the case,
though not the Opinion of the Bishop, in the tribunal office, in order to
decide whether anything further of importance can be brought forward to justify
another submission of the petition.
Can. 1706 The rescript of
dispensation is sent by the Apostolic See to the Bishop. He is to notify the
parties of the rescript, and also as soon as possible direct the parish priests
of the place where the marriage was contracted and of the place where baptism
was received, to make a note of the granting of the dispensation in the
registers of marriage and baptism.
Can. 1707 §1 Whenever the death of a
spouse cannot be proven by an authentic ecclesiastical or civil document, the
other spouse is not regarded as free from the bond of marriage until the
diocesan Bishop has issued a declaration that death is presumed.
§2 The diocesan Bishop can give the declaration
mentioned in §1 only if, after making suitable investigations, he has reached
moral certainty concerning the death of the spouse from the depositions of
witnesses, from hearsay and from other indications. The mere absence of the
spouse, no matter for how long a period, is not sufficient.
§3 In uncertain and involved cases, the Bishop is to
consult the Apostolic See.
Can. 1708 The right to impugn the
validity of sacred ordination is held by the cleric himself, or by the Ordinary
to whom the cleric is subject, or by the Ordinary in whose diocese he was
ordained.
Can. 1709 §1 The petition must be sent to the competent Congregation*, which will decide whether the case is to be determined by the Congregation* of the Roman Curia, or by a tribunal designated by it.
[*now Dicastery, following Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022]
§2 Once the petition has been sent, the cleric is by
the law itself forbidden to exercise orders.
Can. 1710 If the Congregation* remits the case to a tribunal, the canons concerning trials in general and the ordinary contentious trial are to be observed, unless the nature of the matter requires otherwise and without prejudice to the provisions of this title.
[*now Dicastery, following Praedicate Evangelium, 19.III.2022]
Can. 1711 In these cases the defender
of the bond has the same rights and is bound by the same duties as the defender
of the bond of marriage.
Can. 1712 After a second judgement
confirming the nullity of the sacred ordination, the cleric loses all rights
proper to the clerical state and is freed from all its obligations.
Can. 1713 In order to avoid judicial
disputes, agreement or reconciliation can profitably be adopted, or the
controversy can be submitted to the judgement of one or more arbiters.
Can. 1714 The norms for agreements,
for mutual promises to abide by an arbiter’s award, and for arbitral judgements
are to be selected by the parties. If the parties have not chosen any, they are
to use the law established by the Episcopal Conference, if such exists, or the
civil law in force in the place where the pact is made.
Can. 1715 §1 Agreements and mutual
promises to abide by an arbiter’s award cannot validly be employed in matters
which pertain to the public good, and in other matters in which the parties are
not free to make such arrangements.
§2 Whenever the matter concerned demands it, in
questions concerning temporal ecclesiastical goods the formalities established
by the law for the alienation of ecclesiastical goods are to be observed.
Can. 1716 §1 If the civil law does not
recognise the force of an arbitral judgement unless it is confirmed by a judge,
an arbitral judgement in an ecclesiastical controversy has no force in the
canonical forum unless it is confirmed by an ecclesiastical judge of the place
in which it was given.
§2 If, however, the civil law admits of a challenge to
an arbitral judgement before a civil judge, the same challenge may be brought
in the canonical forum before an ecclesiastical judge who is competent to judge
the controversy at first instance.
Can. 1717 §1 Whenever the Ordinary
receives information, which has at least the semblance of truth, about an
offence, he is to enquire carefully, either personally or through some suitable
person, about the facts and circumstances, and about the imputability of the offence,
unless this enquiry would appear to be entirely superfluous.
§2 Care is to be taken that this investigation does
not call into question anyone’s good name.
§3 The one who performs this investigation has the
same powers and obligations as an auditor in a process. If, later, a judicial
process is initiated, this person may not take part in it as a judge.
Can. 1718 §1 When the facts have been
assembled, the Ordinary is to decide:
1° whether a process to impose or declare a penalty
can be initiated;
2° whether this would be expedient, bearing in mind can.
1341;
3° whether a judicial process is to be used or, unless
the law forbids it, whether the matter is to proceed by means of an extra‑judicial
decree.
§2 The Ordinary is to revoke or change the decree
mentioned in §1 whenever new facts indicate to him that a different decision
should be made.
§3 In making the decrees referred to in §§1 and 2, the
Ordinary, if he considers it prudent, is to consult two judges or other legal
experts.
§4 Before making a decision in accordance with §1, the
Ordinary is to consider whether, to avoid useless trials, it would be
expedient, with the parties’ consent, for himself or the investigator to make a
decision, according to what is good and equitable, about the question of harm.
Can. 1719 The acts of the
investigation, the decrees of the Ordinary by which the investigation was
opened and closed, and all those matters which preceded the investigation, are
to be kept in the secret curial archive, unless they are necessary for the
penal process.
Can. 1720 If the Ordinary believes
that the matter should proceed by way of an extra‑judicial decree:
1° he is to notify the accused of the allegation and
the evidence, and give an opportunity for defence, unless the accused, having
been lawfully summoned, has failed to appear;
2° together with two assessors, he is accurately to
weigh all the evidence and arguments;
3° if the offence is certainly proven and the time for
criminal action has not elapsed, he is to issue a decree in accordance with cann. 1342‑1350, outlining at least in summary form
the reasons in law and in fact.
Can. 1721 §1 If the Ordinary decrees
that a judicial penal process is to be initiated, he is to pass the acts of the
investigation to the promotor of justice, who is to present to the judge a
petition of accusation in accordance with cann. 1502
and 1504.
§2 Before a higher tribunal, the promotor of justice
constituted for that tribunal adopts the role of plaintiff.
Can. 1722 At any stage of the
process, in order to prevent scandal, protect the freedom of the witnesses and
safeguard the course of justice, the Ordinary can, after consulting the
promotor of justice and summoning the accused person to appear, prohibit the
accused from the exercise of the sacred ministry or of some ecclesiastical
office and position, or impose or forbid residence in a certain place or
territory, or even prohibit public participation in the blessed Eucharist. If,
however, the reason ceases, all these restrictions are to be revoked; they
cease by virtue of the law itself as soon as the penal process ceases.
Can. 1723 §1 When the judge summons the
accused, he must invite the latter to engage an advocate, in accordance with can.
1481 §1, but within the time laid down by the judge.
§2 If the accused does not do this, the judge himself
is to appoint an advocate before the joinder of the issue, and this advocate
will remain in office for as long as the accused has not engaged an advocate.
Can. 1724 §1 At the direction or with
the consent of the Ordinary who decided that the process should be initiated,
the promotor of justice in any grade of the trial can resign from the case.
§2 For validity, this resignation must be accepted by
the accused person, unless he or she has been declared absent from the trial.
Can. 1725 In the argumentation of the
case, whether done in writing or orally, the accused person or the advocate or
procurator of the accused, always has the right to write or speak last.
Can. 1726 If in any grade or at any
stage of a penal trial, it becomes quite evident that the offence has not been
committed by the accused, the judge must declare this in a judgement and acquit
the accused, even if it is at the same time clear that the period for criminal
proceedings has elapsed.
Can. 1727 §1 The offender can appeal,
even if discharged in the judgement only because the penalty was facultative,
or because the judge used the power mentioned in cann.
1344 and 1345.
§2 The promotor of justice can appeal whenever he
considers that the reparation of scandal or the restitution of justice has not
been sufficiently provided for.
Can. 1728 §1 Without prejudice to the
canons of this title, and unless the nature of the case requires otherwise, in
a penal trial the judge is to observe the canons concerning judicial procedures
in general, those concerning the ordinary contentious process, and the special
norms about cases which concern the public good.
§2 The accused person is not bound to admit to an
offence, nor may the oath be administered to the accused.
Can. 1729 §1 In accordance with can.
1596, a party who has suffered harm from an offence can bring a contentious
action for making good the harm in the actual penal case itself.
§2 The intervention of the harmed party mentioned in
§1 is no longer admitted if the intervention was not made in the first instance
of the penal trial.
§3 An appeal in a case concerning harm is made in
accordance with cann. 1628‑1640, even if an
appeal cannot be made in the penal case itself. If, however, there is an appeal
on both headings, there is to be only one trial, even though the appeals are
made by different persons, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1730.
Can. 1730 §1 To avoid excessive delays
in a penal trial, the judge can postpone the trial concerning harm until he has
given a definitive judgement in the penal trial.
§2 When the judge does this he must, after giving
judgement in the penal trial, hear the case concerning harm, even though the
penal trial is still pending because of a proposed challenge to it, or even
though the accused has been acquitted, when the reason for the acquittal does
not take away the obligation to make good the harm.
Can. 1731 A judgement given in a
penal trial, even though it has become an adjudged matter, in no way creates a
right for a party who has suffered harm, unless this party has intervened in
accordance with can. 1729.
Can. 1732 Whatever is laid down in
the canons of this section concerning decrees, is also to be applied to all
singular administrative acts given in the external forum outside a judicial
trial, except for those given by the Roman Pontiff himself or by an Ecumenical
Council.
Can. 1733 §1 When a person believes that
he or she has been injured by a decree, it is greatly to be desired that
contention between that person and the author of the decree be avoided, and
that care be taken to reach an equitable solution by mutual consultation, possibly
using the assistance of serious‑minded persons to mediate and study the
matter. In this way, the controversy may by some suitable method be avoided or
brought to an end.
§2 The Episcopal Conference can prescribe that in each
diocese there be established a permanent office or council which would have the
duty, in accordance with the norms laid down by the Conference, of seeking and
suggesting equitable solutions. Even if the Conference has not demanded this,
the Bishop may establish such an office or council.
§3 The office or council mentioned in §2 is to be
diligent in its work principally when the revocation of a decree is sought in
accordance with can. 1734 and the time‑limit for recourse has not
elapsed. If recourse is proposed against a decree, the Superior who would have
to decide the recourse is to encourage both the person having recourse and the
author of the decree to seek this type of solution, whenever the prospect of a
satisfactory outcome is discerned.
Can. 1734 §1 Before having recourse, the
person must seek in writing from its author the revocation or amendment of the
decree. Once this petition has been lodged, it is by that very fact understood
that the suspension of the execution of the decree is also being sought.
§2 The petition must be made within the peremptory
time‑limit of ten canonical days from the time the decree was lawfully
notified.
§3 The norms in §§1 and 2 do not apply:
1° in having recourse to the Bishop against decrees
given by authorities who are subject to him;
2° in having recourse against the decree by which a
hierarchical recourse is decided, unless the decision was given by the Bishop
himself;
3° in having recourse in accordance with cann. 57 and 1735.
Can. 1735 If, within thirty days from
the time the petition mentioned in can. 1734 reaches the author of the decree,
the latter communicates a new decree by which either the earlier decree is
amended or it is determined that the petition is to be rejected, the period
within which to have recourse begins from the notification of the new decree.
If, however, the author of the decree makes no decision within thirty days, the
time‑limit begins to run from the thirtieth day.
Can. 1736 §1 In those matters in which
hierarchical recourse suspends the execution of a decree, even the petition
mentioned in can. 1734 has the same effect.
§2 In other cases, unless within ten days of receiving
the petition mentioned in can. 1734 the author of the decree has decreed its
suspension, an interim suspension can be sought from the author’s hierarchical
Superior. This Superior can decree the suspension only for serious reasons and
must always take care that the salvation of souls suffers no harm.
§3 If the execution of the decree is suspended in
accordance with §2 and recourse is subsequently proposed, the person who must
decide the recourse is to determine, in accordance with can. 1737 §3, whether
the suspension is to be confirmed or revoked.
§4 If no recourse is proposed against the decree
within the time‑limit established, an interim suspension of execution in
accordance with §§1 and 2 automatically lapses.
Can. 1737 §1 A person who contends that
he or she has been injured by a decree, can for any just motive have recourse
to the hierarchical Superior of the one who issued the decree. The recourse can
be proposed before the author of the decree, who must immediately forward it to
the competent hierarchical Superior.
§2 The recourse is to be proposed within the
peremptory time limit of fifteen canonical days. In the cases mentioned in can.
1734 §3, the time limit begins to run from the day the decree was notified; in
other cases, it runs in accordance with can. 1735.
§3 Even in those cases in which recourse does not by law suspend the execution of the decree, or in which the suspension is decreed in accordance with can. 1736 §2, the Superior can for a serious reason order that the execution be suspended, but is to take care that the salvation of souls suffers no harm.
[An Authentic
Interpretation of canon 1737, 20.VI.1987, establishes that a group of
faithful, lacking juridical personality and even recognition envisaged in can
299 §3, cannot legitimately make hierarchical recourse against a decree of the
diocesan bishop, but they may do so as individual members of the faithful,
acting singly or together, provided they have a true grievance]
Can. 1738 The person having recourse
always has the right to the services of an advocate or procurator, but is to
avoid futile delays. Indeed, an advocate is to be appointed ex officio if the
person does not have one and the Superior considers it necessary. The Superior,
however, can always order that the one having recourse appear in person to
answer questions.
Can. 1739 In so far as the case
demands, it is lawful for the Superior who must decide the recourse, not only
to confirm the decree or declare that it is invalid, but also to rescind or
revoke it or, if it seems to the Superior to be more expedient, to amend it, to
substitute for it, or to obrogate it.
Can. 1740 When the ministry of any
parish priest has for some reason become harmful or at least ineffective, even
though this occurs without any serious fault on his part, he can be removed
from the parish by the diocesan Bishop.
Can. 1741 The reasons for which a
parish priest can lawfully be removed from his parish are principally:
1° a manner of acting which causes grave harm or
disturbance to ecclesiastical communion;
2° ineptitude or permanent illness of mind or body,
which makes the parish priest unequal to the task of fulfilling his duties
satisfactorily;
3° the loss of the parish priest’s good name among
upright and serious‑minded parishioners, or aversion to him, when it can
be foreseen that these factors will not quickly come to an end
4° grave neglect or violation of parochial duties,
which persistsafter a warning;
5° bad administration of temporal goods with grave
harm to the Church, when no other remedy can be found to eliminate this harm.
[See also the observations in Explanatory
Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, 13.XI.1997]
Can. 1742 §1 If an investigation shows
that there exists a reason mentioned in can. 1740, the Bishop is to discuss the
matter with two parish priests from a group stably chosen for this purpose by
the council of priests, at the proposal of the Bishop. If he then believes that
he should proceed with the removal, the Bishop must, for validity, indicate to
the parish priest the reason and the arguments, and persuade him in a fatherly
manner to resign his parish within fifteen days.
§2 For parish priests who are members of a religious
institute or a society of apostolic life, the provision of can. 682 §2 is to be
observed.
Can. 1743 The resignation of the
parish priest can be given not only purely and simply, but even upon a
condition, provided the condition is one which the Bishop can lawfully accept
and does in fact accept.
Can. 1744 §1 If the parish priest has not
replied within the days prescribed, the Bishop is to renew his invitation and
extend the canonical time within which a reply is to be made.
§2 If it is clear to the Bishop that the parish priest
has received this second invitation but has not replied, even though not
prevented from doing so by any impediment, or if the parish priest refuses to
resign and gives no reasons for this, the Bishop is to issue a decree of
removal.
Can. 1745 If, however, the parish
priest opposes the case put forward and the reasons given in it, but advances
arguments which seem to the Bishop to be insufficient, to act validly the
Bishop must:
1° invite him to inspect the acts of the case and put
together his objections in a written answer, indeed to produce contrary
evidence if he has any;
2° after this, complete the instruction of the case,
if this is necessary, and weigh the matter with the same parish priests
mentioned in can. 1742 §1, unless, because of some impossibility on their part,
others are to be designated;
3° finally,
decide whether or not the parish priest is to be removed, and without delay
issue the appropriate decree.
Can. 1746 When the parish priest has
been removed, the Bishop is to ensure that he is either assigned to another
office, if he is suitable for one, or is given a pension in so far as the case
requires this and the circumstances permit.
Can. 1747 §1 A parish priest who has
been removed must abstain from exercising the function of a parish priest,
leave the parochial house free as soon as possible, and hand over everything
pertaining to the parish to the person to whom the Bishop has entrusted it.
§2 If, however, it is a question of a sick man who
cannot be transferred elsewhere from the parochial house without inconvenience,
the Bishop is to leave to him the use, even the exclusive use, of the parochial
house for as long as this necessity lasts.
§3 While recourse against a decree of removal is
pending, the Bishop cannot appoint a new parish priest, but is to make
provision in the meantime by way of a parochial administrator.
Can. 1748 The good of souls or the
necessity or advantage of the Church may demand that a parish priest be
transferred from his own parish, which he governs satisfactorily, to another
parish or another office. In these circumstances, the Bishop is to propose the
transfer to him in writing and persuade him to consent, for the love of God and
of souls.
Can. 1749 If the parish priest
proposes not to acquiesce in the Bishop’s advice and persuasion, he is to give
his reasons in writing.
Can. 1750 Despite the reasons put
forward, the Bishop may judge that he should not withdraw from his proposal. In
this case, together with two parish priests chosen in accordance with can. 1742
§1, he is to weigh the reasons which favour and those which oppose the
transfer. If the Bishop still considers that the transfer should proceed, he is
again to renew his fatherly exhortation to the parish priest.
Can. 1751 §1 If, when these things have
been done, the parish priest still refuses and the Bishop still believes that a
transfer ought to take place, the Bishop is to issue a decree of transfer
stating that, when a prescribed time has elapsed, the parish shall be vacant.
§2 When this time has elapsed without result, he is to
declare the parish vacant.
Can. 1752 In cases of transfer, the
provisions of can. 1747 are to be applied, always observing canonical equity
and keeping in mind the salvation of souls, which in the Church must always be
the supreme law.
**************************************
advena the term to
describe a person when he or she is actually present in the place where he or
she has a quasi‑domicile.
ferendae sententiae the term to describe one of
the two forms of penalty, namely, that which is imposed by
the judgement of a court or by the decree of a Superior, when a person has been
found guilty of an offence. (cf latae sententiae below.)
incola the term to
describe a person when he or she is actually present in the place where he or
she has a domicile.
inter vivos the term to
describe a legal arrangement whereby, during lifetime, a person at once
transfers proper to another person or corporate body. (cf
mortis causa below).
latae sententiae the term to describe one of
the two forms of penalty, namely, that which is automatically incurred on
committing an offence, without the intervention of a judge or Superior. (cf ferendae sententiae above.)
magisterium the term to describe the
teaching authority of the Church.
mortis causa the term to describe a
legal arrangement made by a person during lifetime, whereby only after his or
her death property is transferred to another person or corporate body. (cf inter vivos above.)
motu proprio the term to describe a
rescript (cf can. 59 §1) which grants a favour not on
the request of a petitioner, but on the sole initiative of the granting
authority.
peregrinus the term to describe a
person when he or she is outside the place where he or she has a domicile or
quasi‑domicile, while still retaining that domicile or quasi‑domicile.
The plural is peregrini.
presbyterium the term to describe the
body of priests who are dedicated to the service of a particular Church, under
the authority of the Bishop or other Superior equivalent to a Bishop.
vagus the term to
describe a person who has neither a domicile nor a quasi‑domicile
anywhere. The plural is vagi.
****************************
Sacrae Disciplinae Leges
To Our Venerable Brothers the Cardinals,
Archbishops, Bishops, Priests, Deacons and to the other members of the People
of God
JOHN PAUL BISHOP
Servant of the Servants of God
For an Everlasting Memorial
Over the course
of time, the Catholic Church has been wont to revise and renew the laws of its
sacred discipline so that, maintaining always fidelity to the Divine Founder,
these laws may be truly in accord with the salvific mission entrusted to the
Church. With this sole aim in view, we today, 25 January 1983, bring to
fulfilment the anticipation of the whole Catholic world, and decree the
publication of the revised Code of Canon Law. In doing so, our thoughts turn
back to this same date in 1959, when our predecessor, John XXIII of happy
memory, first publicly announced his personal decision to reform the current
body of canonical laws which had been promulgated on the feast of Pentecost
1917.
This decision to
renew the Code was taken with two others, of which that Pontiff spoke on the
same day: they concerned his desire to hold a synod of the diocese of Rome and
to convoke an Ecumenical Council. Even if the former does not have much bearing
on the reform of the Code, the latter on the other hand, namely the Council, is
of the greatest importance for our theme and is closely linked with its
substance.
If one asks why
John XXIII had clearly perceived the need to reform the current Code, perhaps
the answer is found in the 1917 Code itself. There is however another reason,
the principal one, namely that the reform of the Code of Canon Law was seen to
be directly sought and requested by the Council itself, which had particularly
concentrated its attention upon the Church.
As is quite
clear, when the first announcement of the revision of the Code was made, the
Council was something totally in the future. Moreover, the acts of its teaching
authority, and particularly its teaching on the Church, were to be developed
over the years 1962‑65. Nevertheless, one cannot fail to see that John
XXIII’s insight was most accurate, and his proposal must rightly be
acknowledged as one which looked well ahead to the good of the Church.
Therefore, the
new Code which appears today necessarily required the prior work of the Council
and, although it was announced together with that ecumenical gathering, it
follows it in order of time, since the tasks needed for its preparation could
not begin until the Council had ended.
Turning our
thoughts today to the beginning of that long journey, that is to 25 January
1959 and to John XXIII himself, the originator of the review of the Code, we
must acknowledge that this Code drew its origin from one and the same
intention, namely the renewal of Christian life. All the work of the Council
drew its norms and its shape principally from that same intention.
If we now turn
our attention to the nature of the labours which preceded the promulgation of
the Code and to the manner in which they were performed, especially during the
Pontificates of Paul VI, John Paul I and then up to this present day, it is
vital to make quite clear that these labours were brought to their conclusion
in an eminently collegial spirit. This not only relates to the external
composition of the work, but it affects also the very substance of the laws
which have been drawn up.
This mark of
collegiality by which the process of this Code’s origin was prominently
characterised, is entirely in harmony with the teaching authority and the
nature of the Second Vatican Council. The Code therefore, not only because of
its content but because also of its origin, demonstrates the spirit of this
Council in whose documents the Church, the universal sacrament of salvation (cf Const. Lumen
Gentium, n. 9, 48) is presented as the People of God, and its hierarchical
constitution is shown as founded on the College of Bishops together with its
Head.
For this reason
therefore, the Bishops and Episcopal Conferences were invited to associate
themselves with the work of preparing the new Code, so that through a task of
such length, in as collegial a manner as possible, little by little the
juridical formulae would come to maturity and would then serve the whole
Church. During the whole period of this task, experts also took part, people
endowed with particular academic standing in the areas of theology, history and
especially canon law, drawn from all parts of the world.
To each and every
one of them we express our deepest gratitude today.
We recall, first
of all, those Cardinals, now deceased, who headed the preparatory Commission,
Cardinal Pietro Ciriaci who began the work, and
Cardinal Pericles Felici who over a period of several years guided the labours
almost to their goal. We think then of the Secretaries of this Commission,
Monsignor, later Cardinal, Giacomo Violardo and
Father Raimondo Bidagor SJ, both of whom lavished
their talents of learning and wisdom on their role. Together with them, we
recall the Cardinals, Archbishops and Bishops, and all who were members of this
Commission as well as the Consultors of the individual study groups engaged
over these years in that strenuous task. God has called these to their eternal
reward in the meantime. For
With pleasure we
also refer to the living: in the first place, to the present Pro‑President
of the Commission, our venerable brother Rosalio
Castillo Lara, who has worked so outstandingly for so long in a role of such
responsibility. Next, we refer to our beloved son, Monsignor William Onclin, who has contributed to the successful outcome of
the task with assiduous and diligent care. Then there are others who played an
inestimable part in this Commission, in developing and completing a task of
such volume and complexity, whether as Cardinal members, or as officials,
consultors and collaborators in the various study groups or in other roles.
In promulgating
this Code today, therefore, we are fully conscious that this act stems from our
pontifical authority itself, and so assumes a primatial nature. Yet we are no
less aware that in its content this Code reflects the collegial solicitude for
the Church of all our brothers in the episcopate. Indeed, by a certain analogy
with the Council itself, the Code must be viewed as the fruit of collegial
cooperation, which derives from the combined energies of experienced people and
institutions throughout the whole Church.
A second question
arises: what is the Code? For an accurate answer to this question, it is
necessary to remind ourselves of that distant heritage of law contained in the
books of the Old and New Testaments. It is from this, as from its first source,
that the whole juridical and legislative tradition of the Church derives.
For Christ the
Lord in no way abolished the bountiful heritage of the law and the prophets
which grew little by little from the history and experience of the People of
God in the Old Testament. Rather he fulfilled it (cf
Matt.5,17), so that it could, in a new and more sublime way, lead to the
heritage of the New Testament. Accordingly, although St Paul in expounding the
mystery of salvation teaches that justification is not obtained through the
works of the law but through faith (cf Rom.3,28;
Gal.2,16), nonetheless he does not exclude the binding force of the Decalogue (cf Rom.13,8‑10; Gal.5,13‑25; 6, 2), nor does he
deny the importance of discipline in the Church (cf 1
Cor.5 and 6). Thus the writings of the New Testament allow us to perceive more
clearly the great importance of this discipline and to understand better the
bonds which link it ever more closely with the salvific character of the Gospel
message.
Granted this, it
is sufficiently clear that the purpose of the Code is not in any way to replace
faith, grace, charisms and above all charity in the life of the Church or of
Christ’s faithful. On the contrary, the Code rather looks towards the
achievement of order in the ecclesial society, such that while attributing a
primacy to love, grace and the charisms, it facilitates at the same time an
orderly development in the life both of the ecclesial society and of the
individual persons who belong to it.
As the Church’s
fundamental legislative document, and because it is based on the juridical and
legislative heritage of revelation and tradition the Code must be regarded as
the essential instrument for the preservation of right order, both in
individual and social life and in the Church’s zeal. Therefore, over and above
the fundamental elements of the hierarchical and organic structure of the
Church established by the Divine Founder based on apostolic or other no less
ancient tradition, and besides the principal norms which concern the exercise
of the threefold office entrusted to the Church, it is necessary for the Code
to define also certain rules and norms of action.
The instrument,
such as the Code is, fully accords with the nature of the Church, particularly
as presented in the authentic teaching of the Second Vatican Council seen as a
whole, and especially in its ecclesiological doctrine. In fact, in a certain
sense, this new Code can be viewed as a great effort to translate the conciliar
ecclesiological teaching into canonical terms. If it is impossible perfectly to
transpose the image of the Church described by conciliar doctrine into
canonical language, nevertheless the Code must always be related to that image
as to its primary pattern, whose outlines, given its nature, the Code must
express as far as is possible.
Hence flow
certain fundamental principles by which the whole of the new Code is governed,
within the limits of its proper subject and of its expression, which must
reflect that subject. Indeed it is possible to assert that from this derives
that characteristic whereby the Code is regarded as a complement to the
authentic teaching proposed by the Second Vatican Council and particularly to
its Dogmatic and Pastoral Constitutions.
From this it
follows that the fundamental basis of the ‘newness’ which, while never straying
from the Church’s legislative tradition, is found in the Second Vatican Council
and especially in its ecclesiological teaching, generates also the mark of
‘newness’ in the new Code.
Foremost among
the elements which express the true and authentic image of the Church are: the
teaching whereby the Church is presented as the People of God (cf Const. Lumen
Gentium, n. 2) and its hierarchical authority as service (ibid n. 3); the
further teaching which portrays the Church as a communion and then spells out
the mutual relationships which must intervene between the particular and the
universal Church, and between collegiality and primacy; likewise, the teaching
by which all members of the People of God share, each in their own measure, in
the threefold priestly, prophetic and kingly office of Christ, with which
teaching is associated also that which looks to the duties and rights of
Christ’s faithful and specifically the laity; and lastly the assiduity which
the Church must devote to ecumenism.
If, therefore,
the Second Vatican Council drew old and new from the treasury of tradition, and
if its newness is contained in these and other elements, it is abundantly clear
that the Code receives into itself the same mark of fidelity in newness and newness
in fidelity, and that its specific content and corresponding form of expression
is in conformity with this aim.
The new Code of
Canon Law is published precisely at a time when the Bishops of the whole Church
are not only asking for its promulgation but indeed are insistently and
vehemently demanding it.
And in fact a
Code of Canon Law is absolutely necessary for the Church. Since the Church is
established in the form of a social and visible unit, it needs rules, so that
its hierarchical and organic structure may be visible; that its exercise of the
functions divinely entrusted to it, particularly of sacred power and of the
administration of the sacraments, is properly ordered; that the mutual
relationships of Christ’s faithful are reconciled in justice based on charity,
with the rights of each safeguarded and defined; and lastly, that the common
initiatives which are undertaken so that Christian life may be ever more
perfectly carried out, are supported strengthened and promoted by canonical
laws.
Finally,
canonical laws by their very nature demand observance. For this reason, the
greatest care has been taken that during the long preparation of the Code there
should be an accurate expression of the norms and that they should depend upon
a sound juridical, canonical and theological foundation.
In view of all
this, it is very much to be hoped that the new canonical legislation will be an
effective instrument by the help of which the Church will be able to perfect
itself in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council, and show itself ever more
equal to carry out its salvific role in the world.
It is pleasing to
set out these reflections of ours in a trusting spirit as we promulgate this
principal body of ecclesiastical laws for the Latin Church.
May God grant
that joy and peace, with justice and obedience, may commend this Code, and that
what is bidden by the head will be obeyed in the body.
Relying,
therefore, on the help of divine grace, supported by the authority of the
Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, with certain knowledge and assenting to the
pleas of the Bishops of the whole world who have laboured with us in collegial
good will, by the supreme authority which is ours, and by means of this
Constitution of ours which is to have effect for the future, we promulgate this
present Code as it has been compiled and reviewed. We order that henceforth it
is to have the force of law for the whole Latin Church, and we commit its
observance to the care and vigilance of all who are responsible. In order,
however, that all may properly investigate these prescriptions and
intelligently come to know them before they take effect, we decree and command
that they shall come into force from the first day of Advent of the year 1983,
all ordinances, constitutions and privileges, even those meriting special and
individual mention, as well as contrary customs, notwithstanding.
We, therefore,
exhort all our beloved children to observe, with sincere mind and ready will,
the precepts laid down, buoyed up by the hope that a zealous Church discipline
will flourish anew, and that from it the salvation of souls also will be ever
more fervently promoted, with the assistance of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother
of the Church.
Given at Rome, in
the Vatican, on the 25th day of January 1983, in the fifth year of our
Pontificate.
JOHN PAUL II