Canons 1601-1752

The reference after each entry is to the printed issue of "Canon Law Abstracts" in which a summary of the article is provided.
(See Subscriptions for further details.)

Canons 1601-1606

J 77 (2021), 125-196: William L. Daniel: The Discussion of the Cause (CIC cc. 1601–1606): Technical Procedural Dialectic and Interpretation of the Meaning of the Proofs. (Article) [127 2022/1]

QDE 28 (2015), 92-106: Elena Lucia Bolchi: Criteri e suggerimenti per la elaborazione delle animadversiones del difensore del vincolo e delle defensiones dell'avvocato nella fase dibattimentale di una causa di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [115 2016/1]

Canons 1601-1648

AnCan (Chile), I (2015), 233-359: XXIX Jornadas de la Asociación Chilena de Derecho Canónico, julio 2014. (Compilation) [116 2016/2]

Canon 1603

David Albornoz Pavišić: Il silenzio del difensore del vincolo nella fase di discussione della causa. Conseguenze processuali. (Article in Jesu Pudumai Doss – Markus Graulich (eds.): Iustitiam et iudicium facere. Scritti in onore del Prof. Don Sabino Ardito, SDB, pp. 123-135) (Book) (Università Pontificia Salesiana, Rome, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canon 1606

Canon 1607

QDE 17 (2004), 52-68: G. Paolo Montini: La revocazione di una pronunica giudiziale interlocutoria (can. 1591). (Article) [93 2005/1]

SC 29 (1995), 29-83: A. Mendonca: Recent Rotal Jurisprudence from a Sociocultural Perspective (Part I). (Article) [75 1996/1]

SC 29 (1995), 317-355: A. Mendonça: Recent Rotal Jurisprudence from a Sociocultural Perspective (Part II). (Article) [76 1996/2]

SC 54 (2020), 47-78: Armand Paul-Joseph Bosso: Note sur le concept et l’utilité de la sentence canonique. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Canons 1607-1614

QDE 27 (2014) 143-157: Tiziano Vanzetto: Alcuni criteri e suggerimenti per la stesura della sentenza del giudice nella decisione di una causa di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [113 2015/1]

Canons 1607-1618

AA XXIII (2017, vol. I), 57-77: Manuel J. Arroba Conde: Incidencias de la reforma procesal en la sentencia. (Article) [121 2019/1]

IC XLVI 91/06, 245-290: Paola Buselli Mondin: Osservazioni sull'esistenza giuridica della sentenza canonica. (Article) [97 2007/1]

IM II 8/97, 145-157: S. Paździor: Uchylanie klauzul dołączanych do wyroków w Trybunale Archidiecezji Lubelskiej. (Article) [81 1999/1]

Proc CLSA 2001, 147-172: J. G. Johnson: Elements of a Judicial Sentence. (Seminar paper) [89 2003/1]

Canon 1608

AA XXIII (2017, vol. II), 169-196: Hugo Adrián Ustinov: Ex actis et probatis: dictar sentencia, una tarea comprometida. (Article) [121 2019/1]

AnC 14 (2018), 253-270: Łukasz Pisz: Zeznania świadków a pewność moralna sędziego w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa (The testimony of witnesses and the moral certainty of the judge in marriage nullity cases). (Article) [122 2019/2]

AnCrac 48 (2016), 313-329: Aleksandra Brzemia-Bonarek: Metody odkrycia prawdy procesowej przez sędziego w kanonicznym procesie małżeńskim (The methods by which a judge arrives at the truth in the matrimonial nullity process). (Article) [119 2018/1]

Ap LXXXIV 1 (2011), 27-88: Paolo Gherri: Decidere e giudicare nella Chiesa. (Article) [110 2013/2]

Ap LXXXVII (2014), 645-665: Giulio Ubertis: Il Processo come scelta: il Giudice. (Lecture) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 11/2 (2020), 218-245: Judith Hahn: What does it mean to be “Morally Certain”? How secular standards of proof help to understand canonical decision making. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Canonist 14/2 (2023), 168-184: Lynda Robitaille: Pope Francis and the Art of judging Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [132 2024/2]

Canonist 14/2 (2023), 185-221: Donna Miller: The Concept of Moral Certitude in Ecclesiastical Penal Cases involving More Grave Delicts. (Article) [132 2024/2]

CLSN 121/00, 31-65: Z. Grocholewski: Moral Certainty as the Interpretative Key of Procedural Norms. (Article) [87 2002/1]

CLSN 124/00, 19-34: R. Harrington: Proving the Case. (Talk) [87 2002/1]

CLSN 131/02, 7-15: A. Mendonça: The Consequences of Using "A Given Act" "Not Shown to Anyone" in a Definitive Sentence. (Article) [90 2003/2]

CLSN 150/07, 11-35: Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, Prot. n. 28252/97: Question regarding the Use of Experts in Nullity Cases. (Document with commentary by Augustine Mendonça) [99 2008/1]

CLSN 198/21, 3-65: Christine O’Riley: Moral Certainty and the Role of “Expert” Clinical Evidence. (Article) [127 2022/1]

Comm 37 (2005), 5-7: Pope John Paul II: Allocutio Summi Pontificis ad Auditores, Administros Advocatosque Rotae Romanae coram admissos 29 ianuarii 2005. (Allocution) [104 2010/2]

DPM 3 (1996), 181-191: Pericle Felici: Rechtstförmlichkeiten und Beweiswürdigung im kanonischen Prozess. (Article) [79 1998/1]

DPM 15/16 (2008/2009), 193-217: Richard Puza: Die Wahrheitsfindung im kanonischen Prozess. Moralische Gewissheit und diakonisches Kirchenrecht. (Article) [106 2011/2]

EE LXXIV 10-12/99, 661-696: U. Navarette: Independencia de los jueces eclesiásticos en la interpretación y aplicación del Derecho. (Article) [84 2000/2]

For VIII 1/97, 45-80: Z. Grocholewski: Moral Certainty as the Interpretative Key of Procedural Norms. (Article) [81 1999/1]

IC XLVI 91/06, 139-176: Joaquín Llobell: La modificación ex officio de la fórmula de la duda, la certeza moral y la conformidad de las sentencias en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

IC 53/105 (2013), 7-61: Carlos M. Morán Bustos: La prueba de las anomalías graves en relación con la capacidad consensual: la pericia como medio de prueba en los supuestos del canon 1095. (Article) [114 2015/2]

IC 61/122 (2021), 767-820: Rafael Rodríguez Ocaña: Certeza moral en las causas penales, algunos obstáculos que se pueden presentar para alcanzarla. (Article) [128 2022/2]

IE IX 2/97, 417-450: Z. Grocholewski: La certezza morale come chiave di lettura delle norme processuali. (Article) [82 1999/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 387-416: Miguel Ángel Ortiz: Le dichiarazioni delle parti e la certezza morale. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

IE XXII 3/10, 651-671: Tomás J. Aliste Santos: Relevancia del concepto canónico de "certeza moral" para la motivación judicial de la "quaestio facti" en el proceso civil. (Article) [107 2012/1]

IE XXIII 2/11, 393-412: José Luis Gutiérrez: I consultori della Congregazione delle Cause dei Santi. (Article) [108 2012/2]

IE XXVII (2015), 478-481: Papa Francesco: Discorso al Congresso Internazionale promosso dalla Facoltà di Diritto Canonico della Pontificia Università Gregoriana, Roma 22-24 gennaio 2015, sul tema "«Dignitas connubii», a 10 anni dalla pubblicazione: bilancio e prospettive", 24 gennaio 2015 (con nota di Joaquín Llobell, La certezza morale sulla "quaestio facti" e sulla "quaestio iuris" nelle cause di nullità del matrimonio quale istituto assiologico trascendente l'istr. "Dignitas connubii"). (Address and comment) [116 2016/2]

IE XXXIII (2021), 467-492: Carlos M. Morán Bustos: La ricerca della verità, ratio e telos del processo canonico di nullità del matrimonio. (Paper) [128 2022/2]

IE XXXIV (2022), 93-110: Damian G. Astigueta: La certezza morale nella decisione penale. (Article) [129 2023/1]

IE XXXIV (2022), 649-688: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Nullitatis matrimonii – impedimento d’ordine sacro, impedimento di voto pubblico perpetuo di castità emesso in un istituto, difetto di libertà interna – Sentenza di primo grado – 12 gennaio 2021 (n. 1/2021) – Giordano Caberletti, Ponente, con commento di Santiago Vigo, Sull’esigenza di certezza morale circa la non avvenuta dispensa dall’impedimento. (Sentence and comment) [130 2023/2]

IM III 9/98, 9-43: Z. Grocholewski: Pewność moralna jako klucz do lektury norm procesowych. (Article) [83 2000/1]

IM 13 (19) 2008, 29-41: Remigiusz Sobański: Prawda jako entelechia procesu o nieważność małżeństwa w świetle przemówień Piusa XII do Roty Rzymskiej (Truth as the form (entelechy) of the process of matrimonial nullity, explained by careful reference to the Addresses of Pius XII to the Roman Rota). (Article) [101 2009/1]

ITS 56 (2019), 427-462: Innasi Amalraj: In Iudicis Animo: Canon 1608 §1 of CIC 1983 – Psychological Analysis of Judicial Decision-Making. (Article) [124 2020/2]

J 65 (2005), 146-180: W. Kowal: Moral Certainty and Truth Justification. (Article) [96 2006/2]

J 79 (2023), 285-323: Michael J. Mazza: Moral Certainty in Uncertain Times: The Importance of Standards of Proof When Responding to Accusations of Clerical Misconduct. (Article) [132 2024/2]

Per LXXXV 2/96, 357-385: U. Navarrete: Commentarium decreti Signaturae Apostolicae de recta applicatione cc. 1150 et 1608 §4. (Article) [78 1997/2]

Per LXXXVII 1/98, 81-104: P. Erdö: La certezza morale nella pronuncia del giudice. Problemi attuali. (Article) [82 1999/2]

Per 112 (2023), 233-265: Conor Steadman: Moral Certitude and the Australian Royal Commission. (Note) [132 2024/2]

Per 112 (2023), 349-394: G. Paolo Montini: La sentenza di assoluzione nel processo penale. (Presentation) [132 2024/2]

Proc CLSA 2001, 367-370: E. Kneal: Response, Roll of Law Award. (Address) [89 2003/1]

Proc CLSA 2004, 137-151 (also CLSN 142/05, 62-73): G. T. Jorgensen: The Role of the Expert in Tribunal Proceedings. (Seminar paper at the 2004 Convention of the Canon Law Society of America, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) [96 2006/2]

Proc CLSA 2010, 142-174: William L. Daniel: The Notion of Moral Certitude with Particular Application to the Acts Mentioned in Canon 1682 §2 (CCEO, c. 1368 §2). (Lecture) [110 2013/2]

QDE 14 (2001), 394-413: Joaquín Llobell: Oggettività e soggettività nella valutazione delle prove. (Article) [88 2002/2]

QDE 16 (2003), 61-80: José Luis Gutiérrez: La metodologia nelle cause di canonizzazione. (Article) [91 2004/1]

QDE 18 (2005), 313-328: Paolo Bianchi: La fase istruttoria nel processo di nullità matrimoniale: non solo indagine. (Conference presentation) [96 2006/2]

REDC 70 (2013), 681-693: Rafael Rodríguez Chacón – María J. Roca: Comentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal de la Rota Romana, 158/2010, c. Erlebach, de fecha 26 de noviembre de 2010, dictada en causa procedente del Ordinariato Castrense de los EE. UU. de América. (Commentary) [112 2014/2]

RR 2005, 28-30: Pope John Paul II: Seeking the Truth in Marriage Annulment Cases. (Address) [96 2006/2]

SC 31 (1997), 475-512: A. Mendonça: The Correct Interpretation of Canons 1150 and 1608, §4. (Article) [80 1998/2]

SC 44 (2010), 189-209: William L. Daniel: The Dissenting Conclusion of the Judge. (Article) [106 2011/2]

SC 52 (2018), 283-317: Armand Paul Bosso: La certitude morale dans le processus brevior: nouvelle dynamique ou constance de la doctrine canonique? (Article) [122 2019/2]

SC 57 (2023), 171-228: Joaquín Llobell†: Due Process and the “Administrativization” of the Canonical Penal Procedure. (Article) [131 2024/1]

SCL VI (2010), 209-268: William L. Daniel: The Notion of Moral Certitude in Canonical Tradition and in the Dynamism of the Judicial Process. (Article) [107 2012/1]

M.ª Teresa Cerdá Donat: La certeza del derecho vinculada a la verdad y la justicia. Reflexión utriusque iuris sobre su manifestación en el derecho procesal canónico. (Doctoral thesis) (Laborum – Universidad Católica de Valencia, Colecciones Tesis Doctorales n° 3, 2022) [129 2023/1]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Patricia M. Dugan – Luis Navarro (eds.): Studies on the Instruction Dignitas Connubii. Proceedings of the Study Day Held at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, Rome, January 19, 2006. (Book) (Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2006) [98 2007/2]

Canon 1609

CLSN 168 (2011), 30-48; also CLSN 172 (2012), 103-120: William Daniel: The Dissenting Conclusion of the Judge. (Article) [110 2013/2]

KIP 5 (18) 2016, nr. 2, 107-126: Ryszard Pankiewicz: Votum separatum w prawie kanonicznym i prawie polskim (The “votum separatum” in canon law and Polish law). (Article) [118 2017/2]

PCF X (2008), 321-338: Exclusion of Bonum Prolis and Bonum Coniugum. Decision coram Serrano, 23 January 2004 (Czech Republic). (Sentence) [109 2013/1]

QDE 16 (2003), 164-194: G. Paolo Montini: Adsumus, Domine Sancte Spiritus, adsumus: la preghiera nella sessione per la decisione giudiziale (can. 1609 §3). (Article) [91 2004/1]

SC 53 (2019), 369-429: William L. Daniel: The Principle of Collegiality in the Exercise of Judicial Power in the Church. (Article) [124 2020/2]

Canons 1609-1610

ADC 3 (abril 2014), 251-281: Julio García Martín: Algunas consideraciones sobre la potestad del tribunal colegial diocesano según los cánones 135 §3, 1609-1610. (Article) [113 2015/1]

FC 13-14 (2010-2011), 101-140: Julio García Martín: Gli atti giuridici della discussione, della redazione e dell'approvazione della sentenza da parte del tribunale collegiale diocesano (cann. 1609-1610). (Article) [110 2013/2]

Canon 1611

Ap LXXXX (2017), 441-462: Elena di Bernardo: Il valore formativo della motivazione della Sentenza. (Article) [122 2019/2]

IusM XII/2018, 109-146: Armand Paul Bosso: La motivazione delle sentenze matrimoniali canoniche. Caratteri formali ed alcune techniche esemplificative. (Article) [122 2019/2]

ME CXX 1-2/95, 249-288: M. Thériault: "Subordinate" grounds in the context of cases with multiple grounds: An improvement of the Procedure? (Article) [76 1996/2]

QDE 20 (2007), 436-442: G. Paolo Montini: La formulazione del dubbio. (Article and documents) [102 2009/2]

QSR 21 (2011), 91-126: Elena Di Bernardo: Il nomen iuris tribuere da parte del giudice nelle cause di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [109 2013/1]

SC 57 (2023), 295-323: Roman Rota: Decree coram Jaeger, 18 July 2019 (USA). Pre-judicial question: nullity, or non-existence, of the judgement. (Sentence) [131 2024/1]

Canons 1611-1612

J 57 (1997), 541-549: L. Robitaille: Evaluating Proofs: Is it becoming a lost Art? (Article) [84 2000/2]

Canons 1611-1614

PCF VII (2005), 15-53: Allan Roy E. Remo: Proposed Solutions to the Problems Surrounding the Publication of the Sentence. (Article) [98 2007/2]

Canon 1612

Ap LXXXIV 1 (2011), 115-147: Giordano Caberletti: La motivazione nella Sentenza canonica. (Article) [110 2013/2]

CLSN 140/04, 78-79: Apostolic Signatura: Request for a Pontifical Commission. (Document) [95 2006/1]

DPM 2 (1995), 261-271: Benno Grimm: Die Ausfertigung eines Ehenichtigkeitsurteils in Langform. (Article) [79 1998/1]

DPM 2 (1995), 273-281: Josef Weber: Die Ausfertigung eines Ehenichtigkeitsurteils in Kurzform. (Article) [79 1998/1]

IE XXXI (2019), 515-542: Armand Paul Bosso: L’iter rédactionnel de la sentence conclusive du procès canonique en déclaration de nullité matrimoniale. (Article) [124 2020/2]

Per XCII 4/03, 653-706: G. P. Montini: L'invocazione del nome di Dio nella sentenza. L'esercizio della giurisdizione matrimoniale nella Chiesa. (Paper) [92 2004/2]

QDE 16 (2003), 164-194: G. Paolo Montini: Adsumus, Domine Sancte Spiritus, adsumus: la preghiera nella sessione per la decisione giudiziale (can. 1609 §3). (Article) [91 2004/1]

Canon 1614

IM 13 (19) 2008, 111-123: Grzegorz Leszczyński: Gwarancje prawa do obrony w świetle instrukcji Dignitas Connubii (Protection of the right of defence in the light of the Instruction "Dignitas Connubii"). (Article) [101 2009/1]

Canons 1614-1615

AC 64 (2023), 183-203: Jean-Marc Bahans: La publicité et l’accès aux sentences canoniques. (Article) [133 2025/1]

Ang 89 (2012), 223-243: Cormac Burke: Justice and Transparency in Matrimonial Decisions. (Article) [109 2013/1]

SC 42 (2008), 393-436: William Daniel: The Publication of the Definitive Sentence. (Article) [103 2010/1]

SCL VIII (2012), 373-398: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Failure to Publish the Sentence/Irremediable Nullity of the Confirmatory Decree (can. 1620, 7°, DC art. 270, 7°). Decree coram Erlebach, 30 March 2006 (USA). (Decree) [111 2014/1]

Canon 1616

QDE 17 (2004), 395-412: Paolo Bianchi: La correzione della sentenza (can. 1616). (Article) [94 2005/2]

Canon 1617

FC 11 (2008), 37-76: Julio García Martín – Nicola Gallucci: La potestà dei giudici e dei tribunali e il suo esercizio secondo il can. 135, §3. (Article) [104 2010/2]

Canon 1618

IE XIV 3/02, 679-710: Tribunale della Rota Romana – Beryten. et Gibailen. – Nullità del matrimonio – Questioni incidentali: a) appellabilità del provvedimento decisorio della querela di nullità; b) gli elementi costitutivi del processo documentale e le conseguenze della loro mancanza – Decreto – 12 maggio 2000 – Erlebach, Ponente. (Sentence) [92 2004/2]

Canon 1619

Ius Comm X (2022), 117-128: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: Decreto, 28 febrero 2019. Nulidad de matrimonio; Juan José García Faílde: Comentario. (Decree and comment) [129 2023/1]

Canons 1619-1627

AC 62 (2022), 67-88: Anne Bamberg: La plainte en nullité contre la sentence. (Article) [130 2023/2]

Ap XCI (2018), 11-29: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: Sententia definitiva. Adnotationes in Sententiam. (Sentence and comment) [123 2020/1]

Ap XCII (2019), 223-270: Gino Gatto: Origine e sviluppo della Querela nullitatis: la nullità della Sentenza nella storia del Processo. (Article) [126 2021/2]

IE VIII 2/96, 565-599: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana. Reg. E. seu A. Nullità del matrimonio. Causa incidentale: Querela di nullità e nuova proposizione della causa. Decreto, 15 luglio 1993. Bruno, Ponente (con nota di H. Franceschi F., Il cumulo della «querela nullitatis» e la «nova causae propositio»). (Sentence and commentary) [79 1998/1]

J 73 (2013), 236-241: Apostolic Signatura: Decree of Rejection of a Complaint of Nullity. (Decree) [111 2014/1]

J 73 (2013), 252-255: Apostolic Signatura: Decree of Rejection of a Complaint of Nullity. (Decree) [111 2014/1]

REDC 76 (2019), 479-519: Tribunal de la Rota Romana: Sentencia de nulidad matrimonial. R.P.D. Xaverio Leone Arokiaraj. Templen.-Ampurien. Nullitatis matrimonii. (Sentence and comment) [123 2020/1]

SCL VII (2011), 183-240: Augustine Mendonça: Recent Rotal Jurisprudence on Procedual Irregularities Amounting to Nullity of a Decision – I. (Article) [108 2012/2]

Robert J. Kaslyn (ed.): Essays in Honor of Sister Rose McDermott, S.S.J. (Book) (Catholic University of America, 2010) [105 2011/1]

Canons 1619-1644

IE XVIII 2/06, 439-463: Grzegorz Erlebach: L'impugnazione della sentenza e l'invio "ex officio" della causa al tribunale di appello nell'istr. Dignitas connubii. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

Canons 1619-1648

IE XXXIV (2022), 141-177: Gianpaolo Montini: Strumenti di impugnazione delle decisioni penali. (Article) [129 2023/1]

Canon 1620

Canonist 6/1 (2015), 121-125: Roman Rota: Decree coram Ferreira Pena, 15 February 2013 (USA). Violation of the Right of Defence (can. 1620, 7º; DC art. 270, 7º). (Decree) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 6/2 (2015), 263-278: Roman Rota: Decree coram Ehrlebach, 2 May 2013 (Poland). Nullity of a Sentence for Lack of Contradictorium. (Decree) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 6/2 (2015), 279-291: Roman Rota: (A) Decree coram Arokiaraj, 20 March 2013 (USA). Irremediable Nullity of Decisions (can. 1620, 1º & 7º; DC art. 270, 1º & 7º); (B) Decree coram Arokiaraj, 9 December 2014 (USA). Immediate Confirmation of an Affirmative Sentence of the First Grade or Admission of the Cause to an Ordinary Examination in the Second Grade of Trial (can. 1682 §1; DC art. 265 §1). (Decrees) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 7/1 (2016), 142-145: Decree coram Arokiaraj, 2 December 2015 (Slovakia). Violation of the Right of Defence of the Defender of the Bond (cann. 1620, 7º, 1626, §1; DC art. 270, 7º, 276, §1). (Document) [117 2017/1]

Canonist 11/1 (2020), 129-151: 1. Decree coram Arokiaraj, 28 May 2009 (Accra, Ghana). Nullity of Sentence: Denial of the Right of Defence (can. 1620, 1° & 7°). 2. Decree coram Arokiaraj, 24 June 2010 (Accra, Ghana). Nullity of a Negative Second Instance Sentence (can. 1682, §2). 3. Sentence coram Arokiaraj, 14 July 2016 (Accra, Ghana). Incapacity to Assume the Essential Obligations of Marriage (can. 1095, 3°) (Narcissistic Personality Disorder). (Decrees and sentence) [125 2021/1]

Canonist 13/1 (2022), 15-35: Merlin Rengith Ambrose: Contradictorium and the Right of Defence: Conceptual Clarifications and Canonical Glimpses. (Article) [129 2023/1]

CLSN 136/03, 7-17: Strasbourg Court and the Rota: Case of Pellegrini v. the Italian Republic. (Document) [92 2004/2]

CLSN 159/09, 23-29: Augustine Mendonça: Irremediable Nullity of a Decree of an Appeal Tribunal. (Reply) [106 2011/2]

DPM 15/16 (2008/2009), 421-427: Klaus Lüdicke: Das Verteidigungsrecht im Ehenichtigkeitsprozess und die Instruktion Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [106 2011/2]

For XVII/06, 339-360: Zenon Grocholewski: The Basis of the Right of Defence. (Article) [100 2008/2]

IE VIII 1/96, 145-170: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana. Chilaven. Nullità del matrimonio. Nullità del decreto di Seconda Istanza. Timore reverenziale. Decreto di conferma della sentenza di Prima Istanza. 20 gennaio 1994, Burke, Ponente (con nota di H. Franceschi, Il diritto alla libera scelta del proprio coniuge quale diritto fondamentale della persona). (Sentence and commentary) [78 1997/2]

IE XI 1/99, 71-122: I. Zuanazzi: Lo ius ad probationes come espressione del diritto di difesa nel processo matrimoniale canonico. (Communication to the Convegno di Verona, 25 March 1995) [83 2000/1]

IE XV 3/03, 741-762: Tribunale della Rota Romana – Moronen. (Argentina) – Nullità del matrimonio – Nullità insanabile della sentenza – Decreto – 25 febbraio 2003 – Alwan, Ponente (con nota di J. Llobell: Incompetenza assoluta «ratione gradus» per la scissione dell'iniziale capo appellato dal nuovo capo di nullità giudicato «tamquam in prima instantia» ex. can. 1683. Sull'utilità della «conformitas aequipollens» per il decreto di «litis contestatio»). (Sentence and commentary) [93 2005/1]

IE XV 3/03, 869-871: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica: Lettera Circolare su talune questioni riguardante la tutela del diritto di difesa nel processo di nullità del matrimonio. (Document and commentary by G. Maragnoli) [93 2005/1]

IE XXXI (2019), 627-646: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Iurium (ius ad tumbam) – Nullità di sentenze – Decreto del Turno – 13 dicembre 2018 (B. 158/2018) – Sig.ra XX – Amministrazione del Cimitero, Grzegorz Erlebach, Ponente; Commento di Massimo del Pozzo, Una significativa querela di nullità per difetto del contraddittorio giudiziario. (Decree and comment) [124 2020/2]

IE XXV (2013), 92-119: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Penale e Iurium: riparazione dei danni, Sentenza definitiva, 23 luglio 2010, McKay, Ponente (con nota di Adolfo Zambon, Sul risarcimento del danno. Alcune riflessioni a partire da due coram McKay). (Sentence and comment) [111 2014/1]

IM 13 (19) 2008, 99-110: Grzegorz Leszczyński: Prawo do obrony w przemówieniach Jana Pawła II do Roty Rzymskiej (The right of defence in John Paul II's Addresses to the Rota). (Article) [101 2009/1]

IM 31 (2020), nr 1, 65-83: Tomasz Gałkowski: Wezwanie sądowe i prawo do obrony (The citation and the right of defence). (Article) [128 2022/2]

Ius Comm IV (2016), 295-321: Acta Tribunalium Sanctae Sedis Rotae Tribunal: Decreto coram Salvatori, 19 febrero 2015. Nulidad de matrimonio. Cuestión incidental: nulidad de sentencia; Juan José García Faílde: Comentario al Decreto coram Salvatori, 19 febrero 2015. (Decree and comment) [118 2017/2]

Ius Comm IX (2021), 47-67: †Antoni Stankiewicz: Denuncia calumniosa al Superior eclesiástico por algún delito y otra lesión de la buena fama. Algunos aspectos sustantivos y procesales. (Article) [127 2022/1]

J 71 (2011), 159-172: William L. Daniel: Nullity of the Definitive Sentence Due to the Violation of the Right of Defense: A Case Study. (Article) [109 2013/1]

J 80 (2024), 263-309: Tribunal of the Roman Rota: 1. Decree coram Salvatori, Nullitatis matrimonii; Prael.: Nullitatis sententiae et Admissionis appellationis, B. 8/2022, February 10, 2022; 2 Decree coram Salvatori, Nullitatis matrimonii; Prael.: Nullitatis decreti, B. 30/2023, March 2, 2023; Mario Ferrante: Violation of Constitutive Procedural Laws and Injury to the Right of Defense. (Decrees and comment) [133 2025/1]

ME CXXI 1/96, 84-92: Neosolien.: Nullitatis Matrimonii (D.-P.) ob metum mulieri actrici incussum necnon ob impotentiam viri. Nullitatis sententiae secundi gradus diei 21 februarii 1991 Tribunalis Nitriensis. Decretum diei 24 martii 1994 coram R.P.D. Mario Giannecchini, Ponente. (Decree) [77 1997/1]

ME CXXI 3/96, 337-351: Arundellien. Brichtelmestunen: Nullitatis Matrimonii (U.-R.) Praejudicialis: Nullitatis sententiarum. Decretum diei 28 julii 1994 coram R.P.D. Antonio Stankiewicz, Ponente. (Decree) [78 1997/2]

OAK XLII 2/93, 418-436: F. Bernhard: Zur Frage der Anwendbarkeit der Urteilsnichtigkeitsgründe des ordentlichen Streitverfahrens auf den Ehenichtigkeitsprozeß. (Article) [77 1997/1]

PCF X (2008), 383-400: A Leap from Error to Grave Lack of Due Discretion. Decision coram Stankiewicz, 2006 (Madrid, Spain). (Sentence) [109 2013/1]

PCF XI (2009), 271-279: Augustine Mendonça: Irremediable Nullity of a Decree Issued by a First Instance Tribunal. (Article) [103 2010/1]

PCF XII (2010), 277-290: Violation of the Right of Defence in a Penal Trial (Decision coram Alwan), 20 February 2001. (Sentence) [109 2013/1]

PCF XII (2010), 291-300: Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Absolute Incompetence of a Tribunal (Decision coram Defilippi), 30 November 2000. (Jurisprudence) [108 2012/2]

Per XCIII 4/04, 693-718: Acta Tribunalium Sanctae Sedis, Romanae Rotae Tribunal, coram Caberletti: Sententia interlocutoria. De iure appellandi promotoris iustitiae adversus decretum turni. (Sentence) [94 2005/2]

Per 102 (2013), 317-350: G. Paolo Montini: La nullità insanabile per denegato diritto di difesa (can. 1620 7°) e il difensore del vincolo. (Article) [112 2014/2]

Per 102 (2013), 499-513: Acta Tribunalium Sanctae Sedis. Romanae Rotae Tribunal coram Erlebach, Decretum Turni diei 2 maii 2013 (de nullitate sententiarum primi et secundi iudicii gradus). (Decree) [112 2014/2]

Per 106 (2017), 491-536: William L. Daniel: Recent Rotal Jurisprudence concerning the Nullity of the Definitive Sentence. (Article) [120 2018/2]

Per 109 (2020), 527-548: Damián Astigueta: La trasparenza e il diritto di difesa. (Presentation) [128 2022/2]

Proc CLSA 2008, 355-382: Phillip Brown: The Right of Defense in Canon Law (and "Due Process" in American Civil Law). (Preliminary Study) [103 2010/1]

QDE 16 (2003), 117-130: Paolo Bianchi: Il ricorso al giudice civile in ambito giudiziario matrimoniale canonico: prospettiva canonistica. (Article) [91 2004/1]

QDE 17 (2004), 186-201: Eugenio Zanetti: Il giudice e la ritrattazione o emendazione di una sentenza nulla (can. 1626 §2). (Article) [93 2005/1]

SC 32 (1998), 515-524: Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Cormac Burke, 22 May 1997, nullity of marriage (incidental: nullity of a sentence). (Judicial decree) [82 1999/2]

SC 33 (1999), 293-347: A. Mendonça: The Right of the Parties to Inspect the Acts and Its Relation to the Validity of a Definitive Sentence in a Marriage Nullity Process. (Article) [84 2000/2]

SC 37 3/01, 163-174: R. Jacques: Droit de la défense de présenter de nouvelles preuves en appel. (Judicial Chronicle) [92 2004/2]

SC 42 (2008), 219-226: Diocese of Cleveland, Court of Second Instance: Decision coram Yanus, 7 July 2006. (Sentence) [103 2010/1]

SC 46 (2012), 239-247: Roman Rota: Decree of Irremediable Nullity of a Sentence, Trial Without a Petition. Decree coram Erlebach, 2 July 2009 (Colombia). (Document) [109 2013/1]

SC 46 (2012), 231-237. Roman Rota: Decree of Irremediable Nullity of a Sentence ultra petita, Denial of the Right of Defense. Decree coram Arokiaraj, 16 April 2008 (Colombia). (Document) [109 2013/1]

SC 46 (2012), 249-258: Roman Rota: Decree of Irremediable Nullity of a Sentence, Violation of the Right of Defense. Decree coram Arokiaraj, 28 May 2010 (Spain). (Document) [109 2013/1]

SC 47 (2013), 207-219: Irremediable Nullity of Decisions (can. 1620, 7º; DC art. 207, 7º); New Proposition of the Cause (cann. 1643 and 1644, §1; DC artt. 280 and 290). Decree coram Arellano Cedillo, 25 March 2010 (USA). (Decree) [111 2014/1]

SC 48 (2014), 5-100: William Daniel: The Nullity of the Definitive Sentence in the Jurisprudence of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota. (Article) [114 2015/2]

SC 48 (2014), 569-578: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Irremediable Nullity of the Decree. Violation of the Right of Defence (Can. 1620, 7°; DC art. 270, 7°). Decree coram Pinto, 22 June 2001, Green Bay, Wisconsin (USA). (Decree) [114 2015/2]

SCL III (2007), 445-450: A. Mendonça: Denial of the Right of Defense. (Opinion) [100 2008/2]

SCL VI (2010), 389-396: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Irremediable Nullity of a Sentence due to Violation of the Right of Defence. Decree coram Arokiaraj, 28 May 2010 (India). (Decree) [107 2012/1]

SCL VI (2010), 397-401: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Irremediable Nullity of a Sentence due to a Violation of the Right of Defence. Decree coram Monier, 27 November 2009 (Madras-Mylapore, India). (Decree) [107 2012/1]

SCL VIII (2012), 175-246: Augustine Mendonça: Recent Rotal Jurisprudence on Procedural Irregularities Amounting to Nullity of a Decision – II. (Article) [111 2014/1]

SCL VIII (2012), 399-406: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Failure to Communicate the Formula of Doubt (cann. 1507, 1508, 1677; DC artt. 126, 127); Gathering of Evidence by the Defender of the Bond (can. 1561; DC art. 166); Failure to Provide an Advocate (cann. 1481-1482; DC artt. 101-103). (Violation of the Right of Defence, can. 1620, 7°; DC. art 270, 7°). Decree coram Alwan, 19 May 2009 (India). (Decree) [111 2014/1]

SCL IX (2013), 327-358: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Irremediable Nullity of Definitive Decisions (Violation of the Right of Defence, can. 1620 7°; DC art. 270 7°). Decree coram Sable 11 January 2001 (Bangalore, India). (Decree) [113 2015/1]

SCL IX (2013), 399-406: Augustine Mendonça: Where Do We Start Again when a First Instance Sentence has been Declared "Irremediably Null"? (Opinion) [113 2015/1]

SCL IX (2013), 423-432: Augustine Mendonça: Consequences of Not Using an Expert in a Marriage Nullity Case. (Opinion) [113 2015/1]

SCL XIV (2019), 305-362: Merlin Rengith Ambrose: Right of Defence a Conditio sine qua non: A Critical Evaluation in the light of Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [126 2021/2]

SCL XV (2020), 349-400: Merlin Rengith Ambrose: Ius Defensionis: Fulcrum of Justice in the Rotal Jurisprudence. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Canons 1620-1622

CLSN 131/02, 7-15: A. Mendonça: The Consequences of Using "A Given Act" "Not Shown to Anyone" in a Definitive Sentence. (Article) [90 2003/2]

IC XLVI 91/06, 245-290: Paola Buselli Mondin: Osservazioni sull'esistenza giuridica della sentenza canonica. (Article) [97 2007/1]

Canon 1622

CLSN 159/09, 23-29: Augustine Mendonça: Irremediable Nullity of a Decree of an Appeal Tribunal. (Reply) [106 2011/2]

J 57 (1997), 541-549: L. Robitaille: Evaluating Proofs: Is it becoming a lost Art? (Article) [84 2000/2]

ME CXXI 3/96, 352-363: Brixien. iurium (M.-Seminarium et Sanctuarium "delle Grazie"). Incidentis: querelae nullitatis sententiae primae gradus ob absentiam Promotoris Justitiae. Decretum Turni diei 28 aprilis 1993 coram R.P.D. Victorio Palestro, Ponente. (Decree) [78 1997/2]

ME CXXI 3/96,364-369: Brixien. (M.-Seminarium et Sanctuarium "delle Grazie"). Querelae Nullitatis: Utrum decretum Rotale diei 28 aprilis a. 1993 confirmandum vel infirmandum sit. (De ratione Boni Publici, Boni Communis, Ordinis Publici deque eorum relatione cum Salute Animarum) Decretum Turni diei 27 octobris 1993 coram R.P.D. Bernardo de Lanversin, Ponente. (Decree) [78 1997/2]

OAK XLII 2/93, 418-436: F. Bernhard: Zur Frage der Anwendbarkeit der Urteilsnichtigkeitsgründe des ordentlichen Streitverfahrens auf den Ehenichtigkeitsprozeß. (Article) [77 1997/1]

PCF XI (2009), 271-279: Augustine Mendonça: Irremediable Nullity of a Decree Issued by a First Instance Tribunal. (Article) [103 2010/1]

QDE 17 (2004), 186-201: Eugenio Zanetti: Il giudice e la ritrattazione o emendazione di una sentenza nulla (can. 1626 §2). (Article) [93 2005/1]

SC 48 (2014), 5-100: William Daniel: The Nullity of the Definitive Sentence in the Jurisprudence of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota. (Article) [114 2015/2]

SCL IV (2008), 437-446: Augustine Mendonça: Irremediable Nullity of a Decree of an Appeal Tribunal. (Reply) [102 2009/2]

SCL VIII (2012), 175-246: Augustine Mendonça: Recent Rotal Jurisprudence on Procedural Irregularities Amounting to Nullity of a Decision – II. (Article) [111 2014/1]

Canon 1624

CLSN 161/10, 41-44: Paul Gargaro: Judges as Witnesses in Querelae Nullitatis Cases? (Article) [106 2011/2]

CLSN 163/10, 49-50: John Jukes: Further Comment on a Querela Nullitatis in Matrimonial Cases. (Article) [106 2011/2]

Canon 1625

ME CXXII 2/97, 311-322: S. Villeggiante: Querela di nullità e contestuale appello contra la sentenza affermativa di primo grado. (Article) [79 1998/1]

Canon 1626

QDE 17 (2004), 186-201: Eugenio Zanetti: Il giudice e la ritrattazione o emendazione di una sentenza nulla (can. 1626 §2). (Article) [93 2005/1]

Canon 1628

Per 107 (2018), 663-682: Acta Tribunalium Sanctae Sedis. Romanae Rotae Tribunal. Coram Erlebach, Decretum turni diei 8 februarii 2018. (Decree) [123 2020/1]

Proc CLSA 2008, 74-84: Ronald Bowers: A Perspective on Tribunal Ministry: The 1960s to the Present. (Seminar paper) [102 2009/2]

Canons 1628-1640

FT 18 (2007), 147-170: Markus Müller: Die Berufung im kanonischen Prozessrecht. (Article) [101 2009/1]

IM 34 (2023), nr 2, 181-194: Urszula Nowicka: Prawo strony powodowej do apelacji od wyroku pozytywnego w świetle dekretu coram Erlebach z 8 lutego 2018 r (The petitioner’s right of appeal against an affirmative sentence in the Rotal decree coram Erlebach of 8 February 2018). (Commentary) [132 2024/2]

Ius Comm V (2017), 65-87: Grzegorz Erlebach: Algunas cuestiones sobre la apelación en las causas de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [119 2018/1]

Proc CLSA 2003, 135-150: J. P. Lucas: Levels of Church Authority: Conflict or Complementarity? Relations between First and Second Instance Tribunals. (Seminar Paper at the 2003 Convention of the Canon Law Society of America, Portland, Oregon) [93 2005/1]

RMDC 18 (2012), 75-108: Miguel López Dávalos: La apelación contra la sentencia. (Article) [109 2013/1]

SC 32 (1998), 441-500: A. Mendonça: The Structural and Functional Aspects of an Appeal Tribunal in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [82 1999/2]

Canon 1629

J 73 (2013), 236-241: Apostolic Signatura: Decree of Rejection of a Complaint of Nullity. (Decree) [111 2014/1]

REDC 64 (2007), 407-414: c. Panizo Orallo: Tribunal de la Rota de la Nunciatura Apostólica, nulidad de matrimonio (incidente procesal de competencia del tribunal de primera instancia), 29 de mayo de 1998, decreto definitivo. (Sentence) [101 2009/1]

Andrés Fuentes Calero: Impugnabilidad de las decisiones judiciales expeditissime. (Book) (Lateran University Press, Rome, 2013) [113 2015/1]

Canon 1630

J 78 (2022), 327-354: Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Decree coram Erlebach, Nullitatis matrimonii; Prael.: De iure appellandi, B. 78/2021, June 17, 2021; Mario Ferrante: Expiration of Time Limits and the Ius appellationis. (Decree and comment) [129 2023/1]

Canons 1630-1635

SC 37 3/01, 163-174: R. Jacques: Droit de la défense de présenter de nouvelles preuves en appel. (Judicial Chronicle) [92 2004/2]

Canon 1631

Per 99 (2010), 305-343: G. Paolo Montini: Alcune questioni in merito al can. 1631. (Article) [106 2011/2]

Canon 1634

AC 64 (2023), 183-203: Jean-Marc Bahans: La publicité et l’accès aux sentences canoniques. (Article) [133 2025/1]

QDE 33 (2020), 496-499: Paolo Bianchi: Le osservazioni e l’appello del difensore del vincolo alla luce del motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Response to a question) [126 2021/2]

Canon 1635

ME CXXIV 3/99, 458-489: Spalaten.-Macarscen.: Nullitatis Matrimonii (K.-P.): a) de jure appellandi; b) de viri conventi defectu discretionis iudicii; c) de viri conventi incapacitate assumendi obligationes matrimoniales essentiales; d) de dolo tamquam in prima instantia, subordinate ad alia capita adducta. Sententia definitiva diei 15 maii 1997 coram R.P.D. Bernardo De Lanversin, Ponente. (Sentence) [84 2000/2]

Canon 1636

IC XLVI 91/06, 99-137: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: La introducción de la causa y la cesación de la instancia en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

Per 112 (2023), 1-42: G. Paolo Montini: La rinuncia all’appello del difensore del vincolo nel nuovo processo di nullità matrimoniale (can. 1636 §2). (Presentation) [131 2024/1]

QDE 31 (2018), 492-508: G. Paolo Montini: Alcune questioni nuove circa l’appello dopo il MIDI. L’esecuzione della sentenza affermativa; il decreto esecutorio; il ruolo del giudice a quo in caso di appello controverso; la rinuncia all’appello. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Canon 1637

IM 33 (2022), nr 1, 177-193: Urszula Nowicka: Instytucja apelacji wpadkowej w systemie prawa kanonicznego (The institution of the incidental appeal in the system of canon law). (Article) [130 2023/2]

Canon 1639

IE XIX 1/07: 191-201: Giovanni Maragnoli: Alcune note su: cumulo di capi di domanda, "assorbimento" di un capo in un altro e concordanza del dubbio nel secondo grado di giudizio delle cause di nullità del matrimonio. (Article) [100 2008/2]

J 78 (2022), 275-326: Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Deﬁnitive Sentence coram Arokiaraj, Poenalis, A. 40/2021, March 17, 2021; Ronny E. Jenkins: The Equitable Conﬁrmation of a Condemnatory Sentence Based on an Alternate Legal Title: A Commentary on the Penal Cause coram Arokiaraj, March 17, 2021, of the Roman Rota. (Sentence and comment) [129 2023/1]

Canons 1639-1640

PCF XII (2010), 277-290: Violation of the Right of Defence in a Penal Trial (Decision coram Alwan), 20 February 2001. (Sentence) [109 2013/1]

Canon 1640

QDE 27 (2014) 222-226: Paolo Pavanello: Nota sulla sentenza nel processo di appello. (Article) [113 2015/1]

Canon 1641

AA X (2003), 307-326: J. Bonet Alcón: Exclusión del bien del cónyuge (doble decisión conforme de nulidad matrimonial con una conformidad equivalente). Tribunal Eclesiástico Nacional de Argentina. (Sentence) [93 2005/1]

AA X (2003), 327-332: A. W. Bunge: Comentario al Decreto de José Bonet Alcón del 23 de septiembre de 1998. (Commentary) [93 2005/1]

AA XI (2004), 267-378: N. Schöch: Criterios para la declaración de la conformidad equivalente de dos sentencias según la reciente jurisprudencia rotal. (Article) [95 2006/1]

Canonist 6/1 (2015), 114-120: Roman Rota: 1. Decree coram Bottone, 17 November 2011 (Italy); 2. Decree coram Monier, 21 June 2013 (Italy). Substantial Conformity of Sentences (can. 1641, 1º; 1684; DC art. 291, §2). (Decrees) [116 2016/2]

CLSN 157/09, 75-90: David Price: Conformity of Sentences in a Marriage Nullity Case. (Article) [106 2011/2]

IE VII 2/95, 645-662: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana. Reg. Aprutini seu Teramen. Hartien. Questione pregiudizlale de sententiarum conformitate. Decreto. 22 marzo 1994. Stankiewicz, Ponente (con nota di L. del Giudice, Novità nella giurisprudenza rotale di rito in tema di conformità "equivalente" delle sentenze). (Sentence and commentary) [77 1997/1]

IE VIII 2/96, 689-711: J. Llobell: Il tribunale competente per l'appello della sentenza di nullità del matrimonio giudicata «tamquam in prima instantia ex can. 1683». (Commentary) [79 1998/1]

IE XVIII 2/06, 417-438: Paolo Moneta: La determinazione della formula del dubbio e la conformità della sentenza nell'istr. Dignitas connubii. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

IE XX 3/08, 539-565: Tribunale della Rota Romana: Reg. Latii seu Praenestina, Nullità del matrimonio. Preliminare De conformitate sententiarum. Decreto, 23 febbraio 2006 – Boccafola, Ponente (con nota di Francesco Pappadia, Alcune note in tema di sviluppi storici dell'istituto della conformità sostanziale delle sentenze). (Sentence and commentary) [103 2010/1]

IE XXI 3/09, 587-593: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Reg. Apuli seu Baren.-Bituntina. Nullità del matrimonio. Conformità delle sentenze. Decreto, 3 luglio 2008, De Angelis, Ponente. (Decree) [105 2011/1]

IE XXI 3/09, 594-605: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Panormitana. Nullità del matrimonio. Incidente: revoca del decreto ed eccezione di litis finitae. Decreto, 16 ottobre 2008, Erlebach, Ponente. (Decree) [105 2011/1]

IE XXI 3/09, 605-628: Giovanni Maragnoli: "Causa petendi", identificazione della domanda giudiziale, conformità sostanziale (o equivalente) di due sentenze. (Commentary) [105 2011/1]

IE XXIII 3/11, 627-648: Pedro A. Moreno: La conformità delle sentenze nell'istruzione "Dignitas connubii". (Article) [109 2013/1]

IE XXXI (2019), 543-566: Pietro Lo Iacono: Conformità per equivalenza, divieto di ripresentare la «medesima causa» e salus animarum: il difficile equilibrio tra giustizia e legalità. (Article) [124 2020/2]

IM I 6-7/97, 211-219: W. Góralski: Problem zgodności wyroków w świetle dekretu Roty Rzymskiej c. Stankiewicz z 22 III 1994 r. (Commentary) [80 1998/2]

J 70 (2010), 270-301: John J.M. Foster: Conformity of Sentences: Something Old Yet Something New. (Article) [106 2011/2]

J 70 (2010), 302-326: John P. Beal: From Theory to Practice: Finding Equivalent Conformity Between Sentences Decided on Force and Fear and Lack of Due Discretion or Simulation. (Article) [106 2011/2]

J 70 (2010), 327-367: Sean O. Sheridan: Incapacity and Simulation: Mutually Exclusive Grounds or Key Juridic Facts Underlying Conforming Sentences? (Article) [106 2011/2]

J 70 (2010), 368-395: John P. Beal: What is an Appellate Court to do? Procedural Considerations when Declaring Equivalent Conformity of Sentences. (Article) [106 2011/2]

ME CXXIII 2/98, 295-377: S. Villeggiante: La conformità delle sentenze affermative nel processo canonico di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [81 1999/1]

Per 112 (2023), 327-336: Romanae Rotae Tribunal: Decretum coram R.P.D. Gerardo McKay, R.P.D. Michaële Xaverio Leone Arokiaraj, Extensore, diei 2 decembris 2016, in una Poenalis: Praeiud.: Null. Decisionum (B. 101/2016). (Decree) [132 2024/2]

Proc CLSA 2000, 107-128: C. A. Cox: Is it the Same Truth? Conformity of Sentences in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Seminar Paper) [88 2002/2]

REDC 64 (2007), 131-168: Joaquín Llobell Tuset: La conformidad equivalente de dos decisiones en las causas de nulidad del matrimonio. Ulteriores Consideraciones. (Conference presentation) [101 2009/1]

SC 35 (2001), 293-356: A. Mendonça: The Effects of Alcohol and Sedative-Hypnotic-Anxiolytic Drugs Intoxication on Marital Consent: A Case Study. (Article) [89 2003/1]

SC 36 (2002), 343-418: A. Mendonça: Jurisprudential Approaches to Equivalent or Substantial Conformity of Sentences in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [91 2004/1]

SC 38 (2004), 329-344: A. Mendonça: Equivalent Conformity of Sentences in a Marriage Nullity Process: A Case Study. (Article) [95 2006/1]

SC 47 (2013), 221-224: Substantial Conformity between Sentences (can. 1641, §1; DC art. 291, §2). Decree coram Bottone, 17 November 2011 (Italy). (Decree) [111 2014/1]

Canons 1641-1644

FI 1 (2000), 243-252: T. Pieronek: Nova causae propositio. (Article) [91 2004/1]

IC XLVI 91/06, 99-137: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: La introducción de la causa y la cesación de la instancia en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

IE XIX 3/07, 627-655: Tribunale della Rota Romana. Panormitana. Nullità del matrimonio. Preliminare: eccezione di lite finita. Decreto, 14 dicembre 2006. Erlebach, Ponente (con nota di G. Varricchio, Problemi interpretativi ed applicativi della "conformità equivalente"). (Sentence and commentary) [101 2009/1]

REDC 62 (2005), 459-500: José Francisco Castelló Colomer: El doble grado de jurisdicción y la doble sentencia conforme. (Article) [98 2007/2]

REDC 78 (2021), 1181-1210: Damián G. Astigueta: El principio ne bis in idem en el derecho penal canónico. (Article) [132 2024/2]

RR 2004, 177-181: A. Mendonça: Substantial or Equivalent Conformity of Sentences. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

SCL V (2009), 479-484: William Daniel: Remedies Available to the Petitioner in a Cause of Marriage Nullity After the Right to Appeal Has Been Lost. (Opinion) [105 2011/1]

Joaquín Llobell: Il concetto di conformitas sententiarum nell'istruzione Dignitas Connubii e i suoi riflessi sulla dinamica del processo. (Article in Juan Ignacio Arrieta (ed.): L'istruzione Dignitas Connubii nella dinamica delle cause matrimoniali [Marcianum, Venice, 2006], pp. 83-119) [101 2009/1]

Canons 1641-1645

ADC 5 supl. (octubre 2016), 53-95: Joaquín Llobell Tuset: Cuestiones acerca de la apelación y la cosa juzgada en el nuevo proceso de nulidad del matrimonio. (Conference presentation) [118 2017/2]

Canons 1641-1648

IE VII 2/95, 663-689: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana. Posnaniense. Dimissione dallo stato clericale. Questione pregiudiziale: nuova proposizione della causa. Decreto. 11 novembre 1993. Stankiewicz, Ponente (con nota di H. Franceschi F., L 'impugnazione del giudicato nel processo penale: "restitutio in integrum" o "nova causae propositio"). (Sentence and commentary) [77 1997/1]

Canon 1643

IE XXXIV (2022), 211-231: Marc Teixidor: Genesi e sviluppo del principio nunquam transeunt in rem iudicatam causae de statu personarum. Considerazioni storico-critiche. (Article) [129 2023/1]

SC 36 (2002), 343-418: A. Mendonça: Jurisprudential Approaches to Equivalent or Substantial Conformity of Sentences in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [91 2004/1]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1643-1644

EE 88 (2013), 767-813: Carmen Peña García: «Facultades especiales» del Decano y novedades procesales en la Rota Romana: ¿hacia una renovación de las causas de nulidad matrimonial? (Article) [112 2014/2]

IM 30 (2019), nr. 2, 63-77: Ludovic Danto: Sentence matrimoniale pro nullitate erronée et secondes noces canoniques: un apax juridique à la suite de la faculté II du 11 février 2013. (Article) [127 2022/1]

REDC 70 (2013), 465-480: Enrique de León Rey: Nuevas facultades de la Rota Romana sobre nulidades matrimoniales. (Conference presentation) [112 2014/2]

Canon 1644

Ap LXVIII 3-4 (1995), 487-519: A. Stankiewicz: Le prove e gli argomenti nuovi e gravi per il riesame della causa. (Article) [81 1999/1]

IE XXI 2/09, 495-503: Tribunale della Rota Romana: Dichiarazione del Collegio sulla nova causae propositio, 27 febbraio 2009 (con nota di J. Llobell, Il ricorso contra el diniego del "novum causae examen" da parte della Rota Romana: la "dichiarazione" del Collegio Rotale del 27 febbraio 2009). (Declaration and commentary) [104 2010/2]

IE XXII 3/10, 629-631: Supremo Tribunale della Signatura Apostolica: Prot. n. 42902/09 CG. Nullità del matrimonio. Ricorso contro la reiezione del novum examen da parte della Rota Romana. Decreto del Prefetto in Congresso, 11 settembre 2009. (Decree) [107 2012/1]

IE XXII 3/10, 633-647: Supremo Tribunale della Signatura Apostolica: Prot. n. 38982/06 CG. Nullità del matrimonio. Ricorso contro la reiezione del novum examen da parte della Rota Romana. Decreto del Prefetto in Congresso, 25 settembre 2009 (con nota di Massimo del Pozzo e Federico Marti, Il giusto rigore della Segnatura nella reiezione del ricorso contro il diniego del nuove esame della Rota). (Decree and commentary) [107 2012/1]

IE XXIII 3/11, 627-648: Pedro A. Moreno: La conformità delle sentenze nell'istruzione "Dignitas connubii". (Article) [109 2013/1]

IM III 9/98, 45-59: R. Sobański: Uwagi o funkcji sędziego w procesie o nieważność małżeństwa. (Article) [83 2000/1]

Ius Comm VIII (2020), 73-98: Paolo Bianchi: La nova causae propositio después de la reforma procesal del 2015. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Ius Comm IX (2021), 317-340: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: 1. Decreto, 6 junio 2019. De nulidad de matrimonio. Nueva proposición de la causa; 2. Decreto, 30 noviembre 2005. De querellas. (Decrees and comment) [128 2022/2]

Ius Comm X (2022), 117-128: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: Decreto, 28 febrero 2019. Nulidad de matrimonio; Juan José García Faílde: Comentario. (Decree and comment) [129 2023/1]

Ius Comm XI (2023), 341-368: Supremum Signaturae Apostolica Tribunal: Decreto, 28 febrero 2019 – Nulidad de matrimonio; Decreto, 8 marzo 2017 – Nulidad de matrimonio; Decreto, 11 julio 2012 – Nulidad de matrimonio; Juan Manuel Cabezas Cañavate: Comentario. (Documents and comment) [132 2024/2]

J 79 (2023), 41-98: William L. Daniel: The New Proposition of a Cause of Matrimonial Nullity before the Local Appellate Tribunal (cf. CIC c. 1681; CCEO c. 1367). (Article) [131 2024/1]

ME CXXVI 1/01, 102-130: Florentina: Nullitatis Matrimonii (Catharina-Nicolaus) 1) De nova causae propositione relate ad caput erroris mulieris in qualitate viro directe et principaliter intenta; 2) ob errorem in qualitate personae directe et principaliter intenta ex parte mulieris; 3) ob incapacitatem assumendi essentiales matrimonii obligationes ex parte viri conventi; et, subordinate quidem, 4) ex capite exclusionis boni fidei ab eodem viro convento, tamquam in prima instantia. Sententia definitiva diei 13 februarii 1998 coram R. P. D. Joanne Baptista Defilippi, Ponente. (Sentence) [87 2002/1]

ME CXXVI 1/01, 131-160: Florentin: Nullity of Marriage (Catherine-Nicholas) 1) on ground of error concerning a quality of the person directly and principally intended on the part of the woman; 2) on ground of incapacity to assume the essential obligations of marriage on the part of the man; 3) as of first instance, i.e. the exclusion of the good of fidelity on the part of the man; 4) a new proposition of the case with regard to error concerning a quality of the person directly and principally intended by the petitioner. Decision 13th February 1998 coram Defilippi. (Sentence) [87 2002/1]

Per XCV 3/06, 483-551: G. Paolo Montini: Alcune questioni processuali intorno alla decretazione di conformità equivalente. (Conference presentation) [99 2008/1]

Per XCVI 2/07, 285-288: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: Decretum 23 novembris 2005. (Decree) [99 2008/1]

QSR 19 (2009), 73: Declaratio Collegii Rotalis diei 27 februarii 2009 de unico recursu apud Romanae Rotae Tribunal ad obtinendam novam causae propositionem. (Document) [105 2011/1]

REDC 76 (2019), 479-519: Tribunal de la Rota Romana: Sentencia de nulidad matrimonial. R.P.D. Xaverio Leone Arokiaraj. Templen.-Ampurien. Nullitatis matrimonii. (Sentence and comment) [123 2020/1]

RMDC 16 (2010), 148-149: Tribunal de la Rota Romana: Declaración del Colegio de la Rota Romana, del 27 de febrero de 2009, para la instancia de nueva proposición de la causa. (Document and commentary) [105 2011/1]

SC 32 (1998), 524-527: Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Daniel Faltin, 8 October 1997, Regina-St. Boniface (Canada), nullity of marriage (new presentation of the case). (Decree) [82 1999/2]

SC 45 (2011), 521-532: Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Decree of Substantial Conformity Between Sentences. Decision coram Boccafola, 23 February 2006. (Jurisprudence) [108 2012/2]

SC 47 (2013), 89-117: William L. Daniel: The Competence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura over Recourse against the Rejection of a New Proposition of a Cause by the Roman Rota. (Article) [111 2014/1]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1644-1648

RMDC 26/2 (2020), 421-463: Mario Medina Balam: Restitutio in integrum y nueva proposición de la causa: Recursos extraordinarios de impugnación para la tutela de los derechos. (Article) [127 2022/1]

Canon 1645

EIC 59 (2019), 299-353: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica: Prot. n. 41767/08 CG, Diocesi N., Iurium, Ricorso contro il decreto rotale del 19 luglio 2008 (Pontificia Università X – Capitolo Y – Arciconfraternità Z); Manuel Ganarin: Quaestio de iure appellandi, duplice decisione conforme, esecutività della sentenza definitiva passata in giudicato. Note in margine alla restitutio in integrum ammessa in una causa iurium avverso un decreto decisorio di rito videntibus omnibus della Rota Romana. (Sentence, decrees and comment) [123 2020/1]

Per VC 3/06, 553-565: Acta Tribunalium Sanctae Sedis. Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal. F. Daneels. Responsio in re particulari de remedio restitutionis in integrum in causis nullitatis matrimonii. Commentarium. (Document and commentary) [99 2008/1]

Per 111 (2022), 491-501: Iurisprudentia: Rotae Romanae Tribunal: Decretum coram R.P.D. Gregorio Erlebach, diei 3 decembris 2021, in una Nullitatis Matrimonii; Praeiud.: Restitutionis in integrum (B. 142/2021). (Document) [130 2023/2]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1645-1648

PS XXXVI 106/01, 5-40, 5-40: A. Mendonça: Justice and Equity in Decisions Involving Priests. (Article) [87 2002/1]

Canon 1647

IE XXXIV (2022), 257-306: Supremo Tribunale della Signatura Apostolica: Prot. n. 30265/99 C.A. Dimissione, 15 dicembre 2001 (sentenza); 30 ottobre 2003 (decreto); 11 marzo 2014 (decreto); 17 novembre 2004 (decreto); Giovanni Parise: Dimissione dall’istituto religioso ob alias graves causas (can. 696 §1) ed istanza di restitutio in integrum. Commento alla giurisprudenza del caso di cui al Prot. n. 30265/99 CA. (Documents and comment) [129 2023/1]

Canon 1649

EE 84 (2009), 779-793: Cristina Guzmán Pérez: Los procesos matrimoniales en los tribunales eclesiásticos españoles. Reflexiones sobre las estadísticas de la Iglesia en España. (Article) [104 2010/2]

IE IX 1/98, 378-396: Conferenza Episcopale Italiana, Norme circa il regime amministrativo dei Tribunali ecclesiastici regionali italiani di patrocinio svolta presso gli stessi, 18 marzo 1997, (con nota di F. Lozupone). (Document and commentary) [82 1999/2]

IE XIII 3/01, 849-855: Conferenza Episcopale Italiana: Norme circa il regime amministrativo e le questioni economiche dei Tribunali ecclesiastici regionali nonché l'attività di patrocinio svolta presso gli stessi. (Document) [89 2003/1]

IE XIII 3/01, 855-856: G. Solferino: Commento alla modifica delle norme promulgate il 18 ottobre 1998. (Commentary) [89 2003/1]

REDC 61 (2004), 285-296: Tribunal del Arzobispado de Mérida-Badajoz, c. González Martín, 2 de mayo de 2000. Recurso contra las costas judiciales. (Sentence) [94 2005/2]

REDC 62 (2005), 501-585: Donato Miguel Gómez Arce: Normas de los Tribunales eclesiásticos españoles: aspectos económicos. (Article) [98 2007/2]

Canons 1650-1655

DPM 12 (2005), 175-250: Michael Werneke: Die Urteilsvollstreckung im kanonischen Prozessrecht. (Article) [102 2009/2]

Canon 1651

SCL IX (2013), 309-326: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Suspension of the Execution of the Definitive Decision (can. 1651); Grave Defect of Discretionary Judgement/Incapacity to Assume (can. 1095 2°-3°). Decree coram Arokiaraj, 21 May 2013 (Italy). (Decree) [113 2015/1]

Canon 1654

IE XXXIV (2022), 141-177: Gianpaolo Montini: Strumenti di impugnazione delle decisioni penali. (Article) [129 2023/1]

Canons 1656-1670

J 67 (2007), 520-534: Lawrence G. Wrenn. The Life, Death, and Possible Resurrection of the Summary Process. (Article) [100 2008/2]

Canons 1658-1670

IC XLVI 91/06, 177-206: Feliciano Gil de las Heras: Las pruebas, las causas incidentales, la publicación y la conclusión de la causa en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

Canon 1659

Ap LXXXIV 2 (2011), 607-632: Marcello Riondino: La "Mediazione" come decisione condivisa. (Article) [110 2013/2]

Canon 1671

Comm 44 (2012), 357-359: Pontificium Consilium de Legum Textibus: Nota explicativa quoad pondus canonicum divortii orthodoxi. (Document) [111 2014/1]

Comm 54 (2022), 102-106: Pope Francis: Udienza al Tribunale della Rota Romana in occasione dell’inaugurazione dell’Anno Giudiziario, 27 gennaio 2022. (Address) [131 2024/1]

DPM 2 (1995), 311-314: Markus Walser: Die Erklärung der Apostolischen Signatur vom 28 Mai 1993 zur Zuständigkeit kirchlicher Gerichte für Ehen zweier Nichtkatholiken. (Article) [79 1998/1]

DPM 15/16 (2008/2009), 37-81: Burkhard Josef Berkmann: Die Annullierung von Ehen mit einem oder zwei nichtkatholischen Partner gemäß Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [106 2011/2]

IE XVII 1/05, 303-333: Pontificio Consiglio per i Testi Legislativi: Nota circa la validità dei matrimoni civili celebrati nel Kazakhstan nel periodo comunista, 13 maggio 2003 (con nota di M. A. Ortiz, La validità del matrimonio civile celebrato da battezzati nella Chiesa ortodossa). (Document and commentary) [96 2006/2]

Ius IV 1/13, 143-160: Sony Kadamthodu: Kerala Agreement on Inter-Church Marriages and Dissolution of Marriage Bond. (Article) [112 2014/2]

Per LXXXV 1/96, 83-116; Per LXXXV 2/96, 331-356: Z. Grocholewski: De periodo initiali seu introductoria processus in causis nullitatis matrimonii. (Paper) [78 1997/2]

Per 99 (2010), 627-679: G. Paolo Montini: Il matrimonio tra acattolici di fronte al giudice ecclesiastico. Alcune note sull'article 3 §2 dell'istruzione Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [107 2012/1]

QDE 21 (2008), 256-265; Paolo Bianchi: Dichiarazioni di stato libero rilasciate da autorità ecclesiali ortodosse. Una recente dichiarazione del Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica. (Article) [103 2010/1]

QDE 23 (2010), 259-274: Paolo Bianchi: Il giudice ecclesiastico e il matrimonio dei protestanti: quale diritto sostanziale deve applicare nella verifica della sua validità. (Article) [106 2011/2]

QDE 23 (2010), 275-284: Alessandro Giraudi; La forma del matrimonio dei protestanti. (Article) [106 2011/2]

QDE 23 (2010), 285-298: G. Paolo Montini: Un protestante puo chiedere la nullità del suo matrimonio ad un tribunale ecclesiastico? Note sull'art. 3 §2 dell'istruzione Dignitas connubii. (Article) [106 2011/2]

QDE 23 (2010), 299-310: Anna Sammassimo: L'esclusione della indissolubilità del vincolo da parte di un protestante nella giurisprudenza rotale. (Article) [106 2011/2]

RDC 47 1/97, 219-234: Louis Menuz: Le travail du juge en officialité. (Article) [79 1998/1]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1671-1672

RDC 53 1/03, 135-158: Emmanuel Tawil: Les revendications concurrentes de compétence de l'Église et de l'État en matière matrimoniale: perspective canonique. (Article) [94 2005/2]

Canons 1671-1673

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 297-305: Gerardo Ángeles Pérez: Del fuero competente y de los Tribunales eclesiásticos. Nuevos cánones 1671 al 1673. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Canons 1671-1675

Comm 39 (2007), 313-333: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Processibus" (Sessio IX). (Report) [105 2011/1]

Canons 1671-1682

J 75 (2015), 467-538: John P. Beal: Mitis Iudex Canons 1671–1682, 1688–1691: A Commentary. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Canons 1671-1688

Comm 40 (2008), 120-142: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Processibus" (Sessio X). (Report) [106 2011/2]

Canons 1671-1691

AA XXI (2015), 71-110: Alejandro W. Bunge: Presentación del nuevo proceso matrimonial. (Article) [116 2016/2]

AC 56 (2014-2015), 89-127: Philippe Toxé: La réforme des procès en nullité de mariage selon le Motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [118 2017/2]

AC 56 (2014-2015), 129-156: Jean-Jacques Boyer: Quelques considérations autour de l’appel dans la procédure ordinaire du procès en déclaration de nullité du mariage après le motu proprio Mitis Iudex. (Article) [118 2017/2]

AC 56 (2014-2015), 189-211: Sabine Claeyssens – François Escaffre: Quarante ans de causes de nullité de mariage. Étude statistique sur l’activité des officialités d’Île-de-France jusqu’à la veille de la réforme de septembre 2015. (Conference presentation) [118 2017/2]

AC 57 (2016), 91-98: Sabine Claeyssens – François Escaffre: Complément à l’étude «Quarante ans de causes de nullité de mariage. Étude statistique sur l’activité des officialités d’Île-de-France jusqu’à la veille de la réforme de septembre 2015». Rattachement diocésain des causes étudiées. (Article) [120 2018/2]

AC 59 (2018), 165-182: Clovis Douanla Tankeu: Fonction, prérogatives et importance processuelle du défenseur du lien dans la procédure en nullité de mariage depuis le motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [126 2021/2]

ADC 5 supl. (octubre 2016), 39-52: Francisco José Regordán Barbero: La investigación preliminar en las nuevas normas procesales del M. P. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Conference presentation) [118 2017/2]

ADC 5 supl. (octubre 2016), 53-95: Joaquín Llobell Tuset: Cuestiones acerca de la apelación y la cosa juzgada en el nuevo proceso de nulidad del matrimonio. (Conference presentation) [118 2017/2]

ADC 5 supl. (octubre 2016), 123-164: Carlos López Segovia: La confirmación de la sentencia en el M. P. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Elementos de continuidad. (Conference presentation) [118 2017/2]

ADC 5 supl. (octubre 2016), 165-191: Manuel Jesús Arroba Conde: La experiencia sinodal y la reciente reforma procesal en el Motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Conference presentation) [118 2017/2]

AnC 11 (2015), 177-193: Tomasz Rozkrut: Recepcja instrukcji procesowej Dignitas connubii w Polsce (Reception of the instruction Dignitas connubii in Poland). (Article) [121 2019/1]

AnC 13 (2017), 229-248: Tomasz Rozkrut: Zawieszenie, umorzenie oraz zrzeczenie w procesie małżeńskim w kontekście procesowej reformy papieża Franciszka z 2015 roku (Suspension, abatement and renunciation in the marital process, in the context of Pope Francis’s 2015 reform). (Article) [120 2018/2]

AnC 14 (2018), 51-68: Tomasz Rozkrut: Terminy procesowe w kontekście reformy kanonów dotyczących spraw o orzeczenie nieważności małżeństwa dokonanej przez papieża Franciszka (Process dates in the context of canons reformed by Pope Francis in respect of marriage nullity cases). (Article) [122 2019/2]

AnC 15 (2019) 2, 61-80: Tomasz Rozkrut: Studium i studia prawa kanonicznego w służbie reform papieża Franciszka (Canon law study and studies in the service of Pope Francis’s reforms). (Article) [125 2021/1]

AnC 16 (2020) 2, 7-19: Rafał Dappa: Biegły jako asesor w procesie skróconym przed biskupem (A tribunal expert as an assessor in the briefer matrimonial process before the bishop). (Article) [127 2022/1]

Ang 83 (2006), 685-704: Sebastiano Villeggiante: Il discorso di S.S. Benedetto XVI del 28 gennaio 2006 alla Rota apre la porta al nuovo processo matrimoniale canonico? (Conference presentation) [98 2007/2]

Ang 85 (2008), 289-300: Sebastiano Villeggiante: "L'expeditissime" e lo "ius defensionis denegatum" o conculcato. (Article) [101 2009/1]

Ang 85 (2008), 765-790: Sebastiano Villeggiante: Il guidice e le parti nel processo di nullità matrimoniale in diritto canonico: problematica attuale. (Lecture) [102 2009/2]

Ap LXXVIII 1-2 (2005), 65-136: Pontificium Consilium de Legum Textibus: Instructio, Dignitas connubii. (Document) [100 2008/2]

Ap LXXX 1-2 (2007), 191-195: Pope Benedict XVI: Discorso di Sua Santità Benedetto XVI ai Tribunale della Rota Romana in occasione dell'inaugurazione dell'anno giuidiziario. (Address) [101 2009/1]

Ap LXXXVIII (2015), 553-570: Manuel Jesús Arroba Conde: Le “Litteræ motu proprio datæ” sulla riforma dei Processi di nullità matrimoniale: prima analisi. Alcuni aspetti delle nuove Norme sulle Cause di nullità del Matrimonio. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Ap LXXXX (2017), 357-404: Arianna Catta: Definitività della decisione giudiziale e centralità della persona. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Ap LXXXX (2017), 501-523: Paolo Gherri: Bilancio canonistico della Dodicesima Giornata canonistica interdisciplinare. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Ap XCI (2018), 405-426: Manuel Jesús Arroba Conde: Missione ecclesiale e Pastorale giudiziale. (Article) [124 2020/2]

Ap XCII (2019), 51-124: Amelia Vincitore: Il Processo matrimoniale luogo di discernimento ecclesiale specializzato. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Ap XCII (2019), 193-220: Paolo Giuseppe Maria Lobiati: Nullitas Matrimonii ob defectum Consensus: implicazioni processuali attuali. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Ap XCIII (2020), 107-126: Francesco Giammarresi: Alcune caratteristiche del processo episcopale nel diritto romano e loro valorizzazione nella riforma dei processi di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [130 2023/2]

BEF LXXVII 825/01, 579-585: J. González: "Annulment": The Catholic Name for Divorce? (Consultation) [88 2002/2]

BEF LXXIX 838/03, 682-685: J. González: Matrimonial Separation. (Consultation) [94 2005/2]

BV 78 (2018), 173-184: Andrej Saje: Dileme kratkega postopka ugotavljanja ničnosti zakona in vloga škofa (Dilemmas in the briefer process for determining nullity of marriage and the role of the bishop). (Article) [122 2019/2]

Canonist 6/2 (2015), 129-140: Pope Francis: Apostolic Letter, Motu proprio, Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Document) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 6/2 (2015), 152-183: Rodger J. Austin: Pope Francis' Apostolic Letter Mitis et Misericors Iesus and First Instance Tribunals in Australia and New Zealand. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 9/1 (2018), 11-39: Michael-Andreas Nobel: The Assessor in a Marriage Nullity Trial. (Article) [121 2019/1]

Canonist 12/1 (2021), 84-108: Merlin Ambrose: The Introductory Phase of the Marriage Nullity Process and the Rights of the Parties. (Article) [127 2022/1]

Canonist 13/2 (2022), 122-175: Michael-Andreas Nobel: Preliminary Inquiry in Marriage Nullity Procedures. (Article) [131 2024/1]

Canonist 14/2 (2023), 168-184: Lynda Robitaille: Pope Francis and the Art of judging Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [132 2024/2]

CLSN 142/05, 30-42: G. Read: Dignitas Connubii: Instruction to be Observed by Diocesan and Interdiocesan Tribunals in Handling Causes of the Nullity of Marriage. An Introductory Comment. (Article) [96 2006/2]

CLSN 181/15, 41-62: Raymond Leo Burke: The Nullity of Marriage Process as the Search for Truth. (Article) [116 2016/2]

CLSN 182/15, 5-18: Lynda Robitaille: The Tribunal's Role in Evangelization: Honouring People's Lived Experiences. (Lecture) [116 2016/2]

CLSN 183/15, 35-41: Helen Costigane – James B. Hurley: Why Have a Tribunal of Second Instance? (Article) [116 2016/2]

CLSN 184/15, 4-69: Francis G. Morrisey: The Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Documents and lecture) [116 2016/2]

CLSN 184/15, 70-91: Paul Robbins: Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Some personal reflections and practical applications. (Comment) [116 2016/2]

CLSN 185/16, 17-19: Vatican Radio: Changes to Rotal procedures. (Radio announcement) [117 2017/1]

CLSN 186/16, 5-49: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Subsidium for the application of the M.p. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Document) [117 2017/1]

CLSN 187/16, 42-53: Mary Pierre Jean Wilson: Apostolic Letter Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus and the 1983 Code of Canon Law. (Article) [118 2017/2]

CLSN 188/16, 46-58: Pius Collins: Mutatis Mutandis: The Franciscan Reforms of Special Matrimonial Process Law. (Article) [118 2017/2]

CLSN 190/17, 56-69: Sebastijan Valentan: Searching for Truth in the Marriage Nullity Process. (Article) [119 2018/1]

CLSN 190/17, 92-103: Vincent Pereira: Episcopus, Parochus, Christifideles and then some in Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [119 2018/1]

CLSN 198/21, 3-65: Christine O’Riley: Moral Certainty and the Role of “Expert” Clinical Evidence. (Article) [127 2022/1]

CLSN 200/21, 28-32: Gordon Read: Ratification of a negative First Instance decision. (Article) [128 2022/2]

Comm 30 (1998), 187-191: Ex Actis Ioannis Pauli PP. II, Ex Allocutione Summi Pontificis ad quosdam Civitatum Foederatum Americae Septentrionalis Episcopos, in Sacrorum Liminum visitatione. (Allocution) [83 2000/1]

Comm 37 (2005), 5-7: Pope John Paul II: Allocutio Summi Pontificis ad Auditores, Administros Advocatosque Rotae Romanae coram admissos 29 ianuarii 2005. (Allocution) [104 2010/2]

Comm 37 (2005), 11-92: Pontificium Consilum de Legum Textibus: Dignitas Connubii. Instructio servanda a tribunalibus dioecesanis et interdioecesanis in pertractandis causis nullitatis matrimonii. (Document) [104 2010/2]

Comm 37 (2005), 93-106: Various: Sermones habiti occasione praesentationis Instructionis Dignitas connubii. (Addresses) [104 2010/2]

Comm 38 (2006), 192-221: Julián Herranz: L'Istruzione Dignitas connubii e la trattazione delle cause di nullità del matrimonio nei tribunali ecclesiastici. (Address) [105 2011/1]

Comm 47 (2015), 11-12: Pope Francis: Allocutio ad eos qui die 24 mensis ianuarii 2015 in Conventu internationali, a Facultate Iuris Canonici Pontificiae Universitatis Gregorianae promoto, partem habuerunt. (Address) [117 2017/1]

Comm 47 (2015), 283-295: Pope Francis: Litterae Apostolicae Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, die 15 mensis augusti 2015 motu proprio datae, quibus Codicis Iuris Canonici canones de causis ad matrimonii nullitatem declarandam reformantur. (Document) [117 2017/1]

Comm 47 (2015), 309-310: Pope Francis: Rescriptum Summi Pontificis Francisci de nova lege processus matrimonialis exsequenda necnon observanda. (Document) [117 2017/1]

Comm 47 (2015), 394-405: Ex Ephemeride L’Osservatore Romano: Interventio a S. E. Ioanne Angelo Becciu occasione inaugurationis anni academici 2015-2016 Studii Rotalis habitus. (Address) [117 2017/1]

Comm 47 (2015), 406-421: Aula Sanctae Sedis Diurnariis Edocendis: Conventus diurnariis edocendis de duobus Litteris Apostolicis Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus ac Mitis et misericors Iesus de causis ad matrimonii nullitatem declarandam a Papa Francisco die 15 mensis augusti 2015 datis. (Press Conference) [117 2017/1]

Comm 48 (2016), 370-372: Allocutio ad eos qui, diebus 17-19 novembris 2016, Cursui formationis Episcoporum de processu matrimoniali a Romana Rota promoto, interfuerunt, a Summo Pontifice prolata. (Address) [118 2017/2]

Comm 49 (2017), 276-279: Pope Francis: Allocutio Summi Pontificis ad eos qui, cursui de matrimoniali processu, a Tribunali Rota Romana apparato, interfuerunt, in Sala Clementina die 25 novembris 2017 prolata. (Address) [121 2019/1]

Comm 53 (2021), 369-371: Ex Actis Francisci Pp.: Litterae Apostolicae Motu Proprio datae “con la quale il Santo Padre istituisce la Commissione Pontificia di verifica e applicazione del mp Mitis Iudex nelle Chiese d’Italia”, die 26 novembris 2021. (Document) [129 2023/1]

DPM 10 (2003), 41-54: Heinrich J. F. Reinhardt: Ehenichtigkeitsverfahren und ihre Spannungen zur kirchlichen Ehepastoral. (Article) [102 2009/2]

DPM 13 (2006), 139-146; 173-175: Peter Stockmann: Die Ansprache Papst Johannes Pauls II. vom 29. Januar 2005 vor der Römischen Rota. (Commentary) [102 2009/2]

DPM 14 (2007), 153-179; 289-292: Peter Stockmann: Die erste Ansprache von Papst Benedikt XVI. vor der Rota Romana im Spiegel seiner Ehelehre. (Article) [102 2009/2]

DPM 14 (2007), 181-204: Konrad Breitsching: Erwägungen zu Rechtsnatur und Verbindlichkeit von Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [102 2009/2]

DPM 14 (2007), 205-215: Frans Daneels: Das Wesen des Ehenichtigkeitsverfahrens. (Article) [102 2009/2]

DPM 14 (2007), 257-272: Klaus Lüdicke: Einführung in die Instruktion Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [102 2009/2]

EE 90 (2015), 621-682: Carmen Peña García: La reforma de los procesos canónicos de nulidad matrimonial: el motu proprio «Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus». (Article) [116 2016/2]

EE 90 (2015), 765-787: Rufino Callejo de Paz: Misericordia y fracaso matrimonial: algunas consideraciones de cara a un posible replanteamiento jurídico-pastoral. (Article) [116 2016/2]

EE 93 (2018), 745-771: Manuel Jesús Arroba Conde: La interpretación de las normas de Mitis Iudex sobre la apelación y la ejecutividad de las sentencias. (Article) [122 2019/2]

EE 97 (2022), 1175-1196: Claudia Izzi: Il processo canonico di nullità del matrimonio dalla codificazione post-conciliare alla riforma scaturita dalla riflessione sinodale sulla famiglia. (Article) [130 2023/2]

EIC 56 (2016), 383-403: Benedict Ndubueze Ejeh: «Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus»: obbiettivi, novità e alcune questioni. (Article) [118 2017/2]

EIC 56 (2016), 521-548: Luigi Lacroce: Il riconoscimento in Italia delle sentenze ecclesiastiche di nullità matrimoniale dopo la riforma del processo matrimoniale canonico introdotto con il M. P. «Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus». (Article) [118 2017/2]

ELJ 10/2 (2008), 191-197: Helen Costigane: Dignitas Connubii: Greater Fairness in Declarations of Nullity? (Article) [102 2009/2]

FCan XI/2 (2016), 35-75: Mário Rui de Oliveira: A reforma do processo matrimonial à luz dos princípios gerais do processo canónico. (Article) [118 2017/2]

FCan XI/2 (2016), 77-78: Papa Francisco: Um serviço de justiça e de caridade às famílias. (Address) [118 2017/2]

FCan XII/1 (2017), 5-26: Manuel Arroba Conde: O motu proprio Mitis Iudex em relação ao conceito de processo justo. (Article) [120 2018/2]

FCan XII/1 (2017), 57-92: Francesco Viscome: L’Ufficio di difensore del vincolo dopo la riforma dei processi matrimoniali di Papa Francesco. (Article) [120 2018/2]

FCan XII/2 (2017), 85-88: Papa Francisco: Esclarecimentos Acerca do Processo Mais Breve do Bispo Diocesano. (Article) [122 2019/2]

FCan XV/1 (2020), 7-36: Alejandro Arellano Cedillo: El Processus Brevior ante el Obispo. (Article) [126 2021/2]

FCan XV/1 (2020), 37-76: Mário Rui de Oliveira: A Assinatura Apostólica e os tribunais eclesiásticos portugueses: a competência da vigilância na administração da justiça e o contencioso administrativo. I Parte: a situação dos tribunais da Província Eclesiástica Bracarense. (Article) [126 2021/2]

FCan XVII/1 (2022), 13-85: Joaquín Alberto Nieva García: “Vademecum” para la “investigación prejudicial o pastoral” según el m.p. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus y la Ex. Ap. Amoris laetitia. (Article) [129 2023/1]

For XI 2/00, 467-477: F. Daneels: Observations on the Process for the Declaration of Nullity of Marriage. (Article) [90 2003/2]

For XVI/05, 42-45 (also SCL I (2005), 11-14): Pope John Paul II: Uphold the truth of Church teaching on Marriage. Address to the Members of the tribunal of the Roman Rota, 29 January 2005. (Address) [96 2006/2]

For XVI 2/05, 346-357: Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts: Press Conference for the presentation of the Instruction Dignitas Connubii, 8th February 2005. (Presentation) [97 2007/1]

For XVII/06, 5-9; also SCL II (2006), 9-13: Pope Benedict XVI: Address to the Roman Rota: Love for truth links the canonical and pastoral. (Address) [98 2007/2]

For XVII/06, 361-384: Frans Daneels: General Introduction to the Instruction Dignitas connubii. (Article) [100 2008/2]

FThC IV 26/18 (2015), 191-200: Szabolcs Anzelm Szuromi: The effect of Pope Benedict XIV's canonical works on the ecclesiastical process law. (Article) [116 2016/2]

IC XXXVII 73/97, 33-71: Joaquín Llobell: La jurisdicción de la Iglesia sobre los matrimonios no obligados a la forma canónica. (Article) [80 1998/2]

IC XLV 89/05, 13-33: Zenon Grocholewski: La función del juez en las causas matrimoniales. (Article) [96 2006/2]

IC XLV 89/05, 259-269: Juan Ignacio Bañares: La dimensión moral de la actuación en los procesos de nulidad matrimonial. Comentario al discurso de Juan Pablo II al tribunal de la Rota Romana de 29.I.2005. (Commentary) [96 2006/2]

IC XLVI 91/06, 33-58: Frans Daneels: Una introducción general a la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

IC XLVI 91/06, 59-97: Javier Otaduy: El principio de jerarquía normativa y la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

IC XLVI 91/06, 209-218: Santiago Panizo Orallo: Ratio iuris – ratio salutis. Una tensión dialéctica en busca del equilibrio justo. (Inaugural address) [97 2007/1]

IC XLVI 91/06, 293-297: Discurso de Benedicto XVI a la Rota Romana, de 28.I.06. (Address) [97 2007/1]

IC XLVI 91/06, 299-306: Juan Ignacio Bañares: ¿Normas procesales vs. charitas pastoralis en la nulidad del matrimonio? El Discurso de Benedicto XVI al Tribunal de la Rota Romana de 28 de enero de 2006. (Commentary) [97 2007/1]

IC 56/111 (2016), 9-40: Carlos M. Morán Bustos: Retos de la reforma procesal de la nulidad del matrimonio. (Article) [117 2017/1]

IC 56/111 (2016), 41-64: Carmen Peña García: Agilización de los procesos canónicos de nulidad matrimonial: de las propuestas presinodales al motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus y retos pendientes tras la reforma. (Article) [117 2017/1]

IC 56/111 (2016), 65-85: Pedro A. Moreno García: El servicio de indagación prejudicial: aspectos jurídico-pastorales. (Article) [117 2017/1]

IC 56/111 (2016), 87-103: Julián Ros Córcoles: El vicario judicial y el instructor en los procesos de nulidad matrimonial tras el motu proprio Mitis Iudex. (Article) [117 2017/1]

IC 56/111 (2016), 105-133: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: Mitis Iudex: Fuero competente y sistema de apelaciones. (Article) [117 2017/1]

IC 57/113 (2017), 9-44: Gerardo Núñez González: La fase preliminar del nuevo proceso de nulidad. (Article) [119 2018/1]

IC 57/113 (2017), 83-104: Paolo Bianchi: Il servizio alla verità nel processo matrimoniale. (Article) [119 2018/1]

IC 57/114 (2017), 571-603: María J. Roca Fernández: Criterios inspiradores de la reforma del proceso de nulidad. (Article) [120 2018/2]

IC 57/114 (2017), 605-635: Carlos M. Morán Bustos: La vigencia de la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii a la luz del M. P. Mitis Iudex. (Article) [120 2018/2]

IC 57/114 (2017), 637-661: Jorge Horta Espinoza: La potestad judicial del Obispo en el M. Pr. Mitis Iudex. (Article) [120 2018/2]

IC 57/114 (2017), 707-738: Felipe Heredia Esteban: Relevancia procesal del fracaso de las relaciones interpersonales en el matrimonio. (Article) [120 2018/2]

IC 58/116 (2018), 503-537: Massimo del Pozzo: Chiarimenti pontifici sul processus brevior. Riflessioni alla luce del Discorso del 25 novembre 2017. (Article) [122 2019/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 317-342: Frans Daneels: Una introduzione generale all'istruzione Dignitas Connubii. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 343-370: Joaquín Llobell: La natura giuridica e la recezione ecclesiale dell'istr. Dignitas connubii. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 370-386: Antoni Stankiewicz: Indicazioni circa il can. 1095 nell'Istruzione Dignitas connubii. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 387-416: Miguel Ángel Ortiz: Le dichiarazioni delle parti e la certezza morale. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 497-500: Benedetto XVI: Discorso alla Rota Romana, 28 gennaio 2006. (Address) [98 2007/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 500-503: Indirizzo di omaggio della Rota Romana, S.E. Mons. Antoni Stankiewicz, al Santo Padre in occasione dell'inizio del Nuovo Anno Giudiziario, 28 gennaio 2006. (Address) [98 2007/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 503-523: Massimo del Pozzo: Nella verità, la giustizia. Considerazioni a margine della prima Allocuzione benedettina alla Rota. (Commentary) [98 2007/2]

IE XX 2/08, 391-410: Michele de Santi: I processi di nullità matrimoniale nell'istruzione Dignitas Connubii. (Bibliographical review) [102 2009/2]

IE XXI 3/09, 725-739: Portogallo, Ministério da Justiça: Decreto-Lei, n. 100/2009, 11 maggio 2009 (con nota di J.P.S. Mendonça Correia, Anotações à regulamentação do artigo 16 da Concordata de 18 de maio de 2004 entre a Santa Sé e Portugal). (Document and commentary) [105 2011/1]

IE XXVII (2015), 61-81: Paola Buselli Mondin: Processo al processo canonico di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [115 2016/1]

IE XXVIII (2016), 13-37: Joaquín Llobell: Alcune questioni comuni ai tre processi per la dichiarazione di nullità del matrimonio previsti dal m.p. “Mitis Iudex”. (Conference presentation) [117 2017/1]

IE XXVIII (2016), 39-61: Paolo Moneta: La dinamica processuale nel m.p. “Mitis Iudex”. (Conference presentation) [117 2017/1]

IE XXVIII (2016), 209-238: Atti sul nuovo processo di nullità del matrimonio. (Documents) [117 2017/1]

IE XXVIII (2016), 457-477: Masssimo del Pozzo: I titoli di competenza e la “concorrenza materiale” alla luce del m.p. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [118 2017/2]

IE XXVIII (2016), 479-503: Costatino-M. Fabris: Indagine pregiudiziale o indagine pastorale nel Motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Novità normative e profili problematici. (Article) [118 2017/2]

IE XXVIII (2016), 505-526: Javier Ferrer Ortiz: La reforma de los procesos matrimoniales canónicos y su incidencia en el derecho español. (Article) [118 2017/2]

IE XXXIII (2021), 11-36: Ricardo Bazán: La fórmula de las dudas en el sistema del M.p. “Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus”. (Article) [127 2022/1]

IE XXXIII (2021), 37-66: Felipe Heredia Esteban: La reintroduzione del dubbio generico nel Tribunale della Rota Romana: aspetti storici e prassi attuale. (Article) [127 2022/1]

IE XXXIII (2021), 67-87: Paolo Giuseppe Maria Lobiati: Qualificazione di fatto storico e caput nullitatis nel processo canonico. (Article) [127 2022/1]

IE XXXIII (2021), 467-492: Carlos M. Morán Bustos: La ricerca della verità, ratio e telos del processo canonico di nullità del matrimonio. (Paper) [128 2022/2]

IM 30 (2019), nr. 1, 5-16: Ginter Dzierżon: Ewolucyjny charakter reform papieża Franciszka w prawie małżeńskim (The evolutionary nature of Pope Francis’s reforms of marriage law). (Article) [127 2022/1]

IM 30 (2019), nr. 1, 17-37: Tomasz Rozkrut: Zadania biegłego w zreformowanym przez papieża Franciszka procesie małżeńskim (Duties of an expert in the marriage process reformed by Pope Francis). (Article) [127 2022/1]

IM 30 (2019), nr. 2, 49-62: Tomasz Gałkowski: Zgoda małżonków w procesie skróconym przed biskupem (Consent of the spouse in the briefer matrimonial process before the bishop). (Article) [127 2022/1]

IM 30 (2019), nr. 3, 57-73: Tomasz Gałkowski: Papież Franciszek jako sędzia w procesie o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa (Pope Francis as judge in the marriage nullity process). (Article) [127 2022/1]

IM 30 (2019), nr. 4, 81-99: Michał Poniatowski: Ochrona danych osobowych świadków w sprawach o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa kanonicznego (Protection of witnesses’ personal data in marriage nullity cases). (Article) [127 2022/1]

IM 32 (2021), nr 1, 5-19: Wojciech Góralski: Orzeczenie w sprawie nullitatis matrimonii – i co dalej? Franciszek do Roty Rzymskiej z okazji inauguracji nowego Roku Sądowego 2021 (The sentence of nullitatis matrimonii – and what next? Francis to the Roman Rota on the occasion of the inauguration of the New Judicial Year 2021). (Article) [129 2023/1]

IM 33 (2022), nr 1, 117-140: Ryszard Sztychmiler: Przesłuchania stron, udział adwokata (Hearing of the parties, participation of advocates). (Article) [130 2023/2]

IM 35 (2024), nr 1, 179-205: Tomasz Gałkowski: Instrukcja „Studia prawa kanonicznego w świetle reformy procesu małżeńskiego”. Pomoc czy bariera w procesie? (Instruction “The Study of Canon Law in the light of the Reform of the Matrimonial Process”. Help or barrier in the process?). (Article) [133 2025/1]

Ius VIII 1/17, 97-109: Andrea Ripa: Il diritto come strumento della carità pastorale dei parroci. (Article) [120 2018/2]

Ius 14, 1 (2023), 85-104: Alex Velacherry: Pastoral or Pre-Judicial Investigation: A Canonical Provision for the Lay Participation in the Synodal Church. (Article) [131 2024/1]

Ius Comm III (2015), 261-273: Pietro Amenta: Anotaciones sobre la reforma del proceso matrimonial canónico. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Ius Comm IV (2016), 71-102: Roberto Serres López de Guereñu: El motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus: Un servicio de misericordia y de verdad. (Article) [117 2017/1]

Ius Comm IV (2016), 183-201: Dominique Mamberti: “Quam primum, salva iustitia” (c. 1453). Celeridad y justicia en el proceso de nulidad matrimonial renovado. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Ius Comm IV (2016), 203-235: Péter Erdö: Observaciones sobre la nueva regulación del proceso matrimonial. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Ius Comm IV (2016), 257-291: José Luis López Zubillaga: El nuevo proceso ordinario de declaración de nulidad del matrimonio. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Ius Comm VIII (2020), 99-120: Juan José García Faílde: ¿Permanecen la Instr. Dignitas connubii y el Tribunal de la Rota de la Nunciatura Apostólica en España después de la reforma del proceso de declaración de nulidad matrimonial (Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus)? (Article) [125 2021/1]

Ius Comm VIII (2020), 231-264: Nikolaus Schöch: La perención de la instancia después del motu proprio Mitis Iudex. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Ius Comm VIII (2020), 371-391: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: 1. Decreto, 4 mayo 2015. Nulidad de matrimonio. Prórroga de competencia; 2. Decreto, 11 julio 2016. Rechazo de la inscripción en el elenco de los abogados o, al menos, de la admisión ad casum; Roberto Serres López de Guereñu: Comentario. (Documents and comment) [126 2021/2]

Ius Comm X (2022), 47-63: José Luis López Zubillaga: La apelación en la reforma del Motu proprio Mitis Iudex. (Article) [129 2023/1]

IusM XI/2017, 163-184: Ernest Okonkwo: The Pastoral Character of the Process for the Declaration of Marriage Nullity. (Article) [120 2018/2]

IusM XII/2018, 147-169: Eduardo Baura: Il processo di nullità del matrimonio: tra diritto, pastorale e misericordia. (Article) [122 2019/2]

IusM XVI/2022, 119-141: Emanuele Tupputi: La rilevanza della coscienza in relazione alla nullità matrimoniale alla luce del Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [130 2023/2]

J 62 (2002), 195-110: L. G. Wrenn: A New Procedural Law for Marriage Cases. (Article) [93 2005/1]

J 70 (2010), 1-28: Robert J. Kaslyn: The Role of History and Context in Church Law: The Instruction Dignitas Connubii as One Case in Point. (Article) [105 2011/1]

J 74 (2014), 215-263: William L. Daniel: Ongoing Difficulties in the Judicial Praxis of American Tribunals in Causes of the Nullity of Marriage. (Article) [115 2016/1]

J 75 (2015), 59-69: Roch Pagé: Reflections of a Judicial Vicar of an Appeal Tribunal on the Proposed Reform of the Canonical Matrimonial Process. (Article) [115 2016/1]

J 75 (2015), 253-256: Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts: Nota Explicativa about the Canonical Significance of Divorced Orthodox. (Document) [115 2016/1]

J 75 (2015), 429-466: William L. Daniel: An Analysis of Pope Francis' 2015 Reform of the General Legislation Governing Causes of Nullity of Marriage. (Article) [116 2016/2]

J 75 (2015), 593-605: Thomas John Paprocki: Implementation of Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus in the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois. (Article) [116 2016/2]

J 75 (2015), 607-617: Roch Pagé: Questions Regarding the Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [116 2016/2]

J 75 (2015), 663-671: Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts: Letters Clarifying Some Unclear Points of the motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Documents) [116 2016/2]

J 76 (2016), 115-136: Frans Daneels: A First Approach to the Reform of the Process for the Declaration of Nullity of Marriage. (Article) [117 2017/1]

J 76 (2016), 137-157: Bernard A. Hebda: Reflections on the Role of the Diocesan Bishop Envisioned by Mitis ludex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [117 2017/1]

J 76 (2016), 159-196: John P. Beal: The Ordinary Process According to Mitis Iudex: Challenges to Our “Comfort Zone”. (Article) [117 2017/1]

J 76 (2016), 287-292: Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts: Letters Clarifying Some Unclear Points of the motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Documents) [117 2017/1]

KIP 8 (21) 2019, nr 2, 105-118: Maciej Andrzejewski: Zasada kontradyktoryjności procesu o nieważność małżeństwa na tle zasady salus animarum oraz zasady prawdy (The adversarial principle of proceedings for nullity of marriage with regard to the principle of “salus animarum” and the principle of truth). (Article) [124 2020/2]

KIP 8 (21) 2019, nr 2, 131-142: Monika Górna: Wpływ dochodzenia przedprocesowego na przebieg procesu o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa (Influence of the pre-judicial inquiry on the process for the declaration of nullity of marriage). (Article) [124 2020/2]

PCF VII, 7-10: Pope John Paul II: Address to the Members of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota 2005. (Document) [98 2007/2]

Per XCIV 3/05, 417-476: G. P. Montini: L'istruzione Dignitas Connubii nella gerarchia delle fonti. (Presentation) [96 2006/2]

Per XCIV 3/05, 477-507: J. Kowal: L'istruzione Dignitas Connubii e la competenza della Chiesa circa il matrimonio dei battezzati. (Article) [96 2006/2]

Per XCIV 3/05, 509-542: P. Bianchi: L'istruzione Dignitas Connubii e il c. 1095. (Article) [96 2006/2]

Per 104 (2015), 171-208: Frans Daneels: Storia della redazione della Dignitas Connubii. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 209-235: Antoni Stankiewicz: La natura giuridica dell'istruzione Dignitas Connubii nel quadro delle leggi processuali canoniche vigenti. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 237-284: Joaquín Llobell: Prospettive e possibili sviluppi della Dignitas Connubii sull'abrogazione dell'obbligo della doppia sentenza conforme. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 285-331: Piotr Skonieczny: L'insegnamento del diritto processuale dopo la pubblicazione della Dignitas Connubii. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 333-357: Velasio De Paolis: La Dignitas Connubii può essere modello ed esempio per pensare a qualche cosa di simile per altri settori del diritto canonico? (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 365-399: Gianpaolo Montini: Dieci anni dall'istruzione Dignitas Connubii. L'applicazione della Dignitas Connubii dalla prospettiva della Segnatura Apostolica. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 401-442: Grzegorz Erlebach: Applicazione della Dignitas Connubii secondo la prassi e la giurisprudenza della Rota Romana. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 443-451: Luis Heliodoro Salcedo Morales: A diez años de la Dignitas Connubii. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 453-470: Marcelo Gidi: Ricezione dell'istruzione Dignitas Connubii in alcuni tribunali latinoamericani. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 471-486: Philippe Hallein: L'esperienza di applicazione dell'istruzione nei tribunali locali in Francia, Paesi Bassi e Belgio. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 487-515: Paolo Bianchi: L'esperienza di applicazione dell'istruzione nei tribunali locali – Italia. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 517-543: Carmen Peña García: La aplicación de la instrucción Dignitas Connubii en España: valoración y sugerencias de mejora tras 10 años de vigencia. (Presentation) [116 2016/2]

Per 104 (2015), 545-562: Giovanna Maria Colombo: Un'esperienza d'Africa. La Dignitas Connubii alla prova in una realtà di Chiesa giovane. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Per 105 (2016), 417-434: Adolfo Zambon: Il Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex. Punto di vista di un giudice. (Presentation) [118 2017/2]

Per 105 (2016), 621-661: Péter Erdö: Osservazioni sulla nuova regolamentazione del processo matrimoniale. (Article) [120 2018/2]

Proc CLSA 1997, 123-129: J. Catoir: The Internal Forum. (Seminar Paper) [83 2000/1]

Proc CLSA 2001, 215-232: R. Ramirez – C. Darcy: Canonical Ministry to Migrants. (Seminar paper) [89 2003/1]

Proc CLSA 2010, 115-126: Paul D. Counce: Dignitas Connubii: Five Years Later. (Lecture) [110 2013/2]

QDE 14 (2001), 77-88: Frans Danneels: Osservazioni sul processo per la dichiarazione di nullità del matrimonio. (Article) [87 2002/1]

QDE 14 (2001), 414-425: Sandra Sandri: I procedimenti volti ad ottenere il riconoscimento civile delle sentenze canoniche di nullità. I. Principi generali e procedura. (Article) [88 2002/2]

QDE 15 (2002), 435-444: Sandra Sandri: I procedimenti volti ad ottenere il riconoscimento civile delle sentenze canoniche di nullità. II. Le singole fattispecie di nullità e la loro possibile contrarietà all’ordine pubblico. (Article) [90 2003/2]

QDE 16 (2003), 117-130: Paolo Bianchi: Il ricorso al giudice civile in ambito giudiziario matrimoniale canonico: prospettiva canonistica. (Article) [91 2004/1]

QDE 16 (2003), 131-144: G. Paolo Montini: Il ricorso all'autorità civile nei processi matrimoniali canonici. (Article) [91 2004/1]

QDE 17 (2004), 69-80: Sandra Sandri: I procedimenti volti ad ottenere il riconoscimento civile delle sentenze canoniche di nullità. III. Gli effetti economici. (Article) [93 2005/1]

QDE 18 (2005), 342-363: G. Paolo Montini: L'istruzione Dignitas connubii sui processi di nullità matrimoniale. Una introduzione. (Article) [96 2006/2]

QDE 18 (2005), 364-375: Bassiano Uggè: Le terminologia non contenziosa dell'istruzione Dignitas connubii. (Article) [96 2006/2]

QDE 18 (2005), 376-392: Paolo Bianchi: Il can. 1095 nell'istruzione Dignitas connubii. (Article) [96 2006/2]

QDE 23 (2010), 341-359: Davide Salvatori: La deontologia professionale per chi opera nell'ambito ecclesiale delle cause matrimoniali: punti fermi del recente Magistero. (Article) [106 2011/2]

QDE 23 (2010), 360-373: Paolo Bianchi: Disturbi di personalità e immaturità in relazione al can. 1095. Profili canonici. (Article) [106 2011/2]

QDE 27 (2014) 238-241: Eugenio Zanetti: Snellimento della prassi canonica in ordine alla dichiarazione di nullità del vincolo matrimonial? /1. (Article) [113 2015/1]

QDE 28 (2015), 319-325: Alessandro Giraudo: Snellimento della prassi canonica in ordine alla dichiarazione di nullità del vincolo matrimoniale? /6. (Article) [116 2016/2]

QDE 33 (2020), 461-495: Massimo Mingardi: Questioni legate alla scelta della via processuale nel nuovo processo di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [126 2021/2]

QDE 33 (2020), 496-499: Paolo Bianchi: Le osservazioni e l’appello del difensore del vincolo alla luce del motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Response to a question) [126 2021/2]

QDE 34 (2021), 323-359: Redazione di QDE: Un dossier sul collegamento da remoto nei processi canonici. (Dossier) [128 2022/2]

QSR 19 (2009), 131-162: Grzegorz Erlebach: Il «capo di nullità» secondo la giurisprudenza della Rota Romana. (Article) [105 2011/1]

RDC 48 1/98, 35-57: Rik Torfs: The Right of Defence in Marriage Nullity Processes. Some reflections regarding a book of Ann Jacobs. (Article) [85 2001/1]

RDC 62/2 (2012), 331-347: Anne Bamberg: «Pro rei veritate!»: Pratique judiciaire canonique et recherche de la vérité. (Article) [113 2015/1]

RDC 62/2 (2012), 349-378: Marcel Metzger: Reconnaître la vérité dans la procédure en nullité de mariage. (Article) [113 2015/1]

RDC 62/2 (2012), 379-408: Jean-Luc Hiebel: Vérité, droit canonique et théologie pastorale. (Article) [113 2015/1]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 93-106: Roland Minnerath: Les références doctrinales dans le motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [119 2018/1]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 107-119: Patrick Hubert: «Ad certitudinem moralem iure necessariam…». La question des preuves à la lumière du motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [119 2018/1]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 151-170: Alphonse Ky-Zerbo: Quel rôle pour les Conférences épiscopales dans la mise en œuvre du motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus? (Article) [119 2018/1]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 171-187: Anne Bamberg: Justice, vérité et miséricorde au risque du mensonge. (Article) [119 2018/1]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 247-267: Jacob Yoda: Le motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, une solution pour les tribunaux ecclésiastiques en Afrique? L’expérience du Burkina Faso. (Article) [119 2018/1]

RDC 67/2 (2017), 485-517: Ataa Denkha: L’impact de la réforme des procès en nullité de mariage sur le rôle du défenseur du lien. (Article) [120 2018/2]

REDC 63 (2006), 747-766: Federico Aznar Gil: La dimensión pastoral del proceso de nulidad matrimonial. Anotaciones al Discurso del Romano Pontífice al Tribunal Apostólico de la Rota Romana (28 enero 2006). (Text and commentary) [101 2009/1]

REDC 67 (2010), 741-771: Carmen Peña García: Derecho a una justicia eclesial rápida: sugerencias de iure condendo para agilizar los procesos canónicos de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [107 2012/1]

REDC 72 (2015), 649-708: Franciscus: Litterae Apostolicae Motu Proprio Datae Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus; Litterae Apostolicae Motu Proprio Datae Mitis et Misericors Iesus; Rescritto sul compimento e l'osservanza della nuova legge del processo matrimoniale, 11-12-2015. (Documents) [116 2016/2]

REDC 75 (2018), 13-18: Mirian Cortés Diéguez: La reforma del proceso de nulidad matrimonial. Algunas claves, riesgos y desafíos. (Article) [121 2019/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 19-40: Francesco Coccopalmerio: La reforma del proceso canónico para la declaración de nulidad del matrimonio. Un comentario a los motu proprio del papa Francisco Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus y Mitis et Misericors Iesus, de 15 de agosto de 2015. (Article) [121 2019/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 43-79: Cecilio Raúl Berzosa Martínez: El obispo como juez, según las cartas apostólicas, motu proprio, Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus y Mitis et Misericors Iesus. (Article) [121 2019/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 173-198: Ángel David Martín Rubio: Agilización del proceso de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [121 2019/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 235-272: Raúl Román Sánchez: Juez único, jueces laicos y asesores en el motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Lecture) [121 2019/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 273-308: Francisco José Sánchez Sánchez: Modelos de decretos según el motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [121 2019/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 309-327: Victor Suárez Gondar: La aportación del sínodo de los obispos (2014 y 2015) a la reforma del proceso de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [121 2019/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 371-374: Discurso del Santo Padre Francisco a los participantes en el curso organizado por el Tribunal de la Rota Romana, Sala Clementina, 25.11.2017. Texto. (Address) [121 2019/1]

REDC 76 (2019), 17-36: José Manuel Ferrary Ojeda: La reforma procesal Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. Aportaciones más relevantes y puesta en marcha de la misma. (Article) [123 2020/1]

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 233-260: Luis de Jesús Hernández M.: Los desafíos canónico-pastorales de los Tribunales eclesiásticos. (Article) [118 2017/2]

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 261-296: Marco Antonio Hernández H.: Los criterios que han guiado la reforma del proceso declarativo de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [118 2017/2]

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 307-337: Rogelio Ayala Partida: El derecho de impugnar el matrimonio. Introducción e Instrucción de la causa. (Article) [118 2017/2]

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 411-456: PP. Franciscus: Litterae Apostolicae motu proprio datae Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus; PP. Francisco: Carta Apostólica en forma de motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus; PP. Francesco: rescritto sul compimento e l’osservanza della nuova legge del processo matrimoniale; PP. Francisco: Rescripto sobre el cumplimiento y la observancia de la nueva ley del proceso matrimonial; Mons. P. Vito Pinto, Decano del Tribunal de la Rota Romana: Explicación del Rescripto del Santo Padre. (Documents) [118 2017/2]

RMDC 22/1 (2016), 7-27: Luis de Jesús Hernández M.: Recepción negativa de la Reforma impulsada por el Papa Francisco mediante el motu proprio Mitis Iudex. (Article) [122 2019/2]

RMDC 22/1 (2016), 29-66: Marco Antonio Hernández Huijón: El papel del Obispo diocesano a tenor del nuevo proceso de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [122 2019/2]

RMDC 23/2 (2017), 400-405: Francisco: Discurso a los participantes en el curso organizado por el Tribunal de la Rota Romana, 25 de noviembre de 2017. (Address) [122 2019/2]

RMDC 24/1 (2018), 79-109: Ana Isabel Romero U.: Investigación prejudicial y antropología del matrimonio. (Article) [122 2019/2]

RMDC 24/2 (2018), 355-398 and RMDC 25/1 (2019), 7-107: Antonio Espinoza Mendoza: La incompatibilidad entre el oficio de Consultor y el oficio de Juez o de Defensor del vínculo en la misma causa. (Article) [123 2020/1]

RR 2005, 112-113: A. J. Espelage: Impact of Dignitas Connubii on Tribunal Ministry. (Opinion) [96 2006/2]

SC 41 (2007), 309-343: Roch Pagé: L'instruction Dignitas connubii: Questions choisies. (Article) [102 2009/2]

SC 51 (2017), 529-549: Alexander M. Laschuk: Mitis Iudex and the Conversion of Ecclesiastical Structures. (Article) [120 2018/2]

SC 52 (2018), 443-469: Chad J. Glendinning: Pastoral Conversion and the Exercise of Authority in the Church: An Examination of Pope Francis’ Criteria for the Reform of Ecclesiastical Structures. (Article) [122 2019/2]

SC 54 (2020), 407-455: William L. Daniel: Dicasterial Sources Supplemental to the Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex (2015-2020). (Article) [126 2021/2]

SC 54 (2020), 623-683: Michael-Andreas Nobel: L’enquête préliminaire dans les procédures de nullité de mariage. (Article) [126 2021/2]

SC 55 (2021), 425-462: Wojciech Kowal: Celerity of Marriage Nullity Processes and the Mandatory Review of Judgments Declaring the Nullity of a Marriage. (Article) [128 2022/2]

SCL X (2014-2015), 15-34: Pope Francis: Apostolic Letter Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus – By Which the Canons of the Code of Canon Law Pertaining to Cases Regarding the Nullity of Marriage are Reformed (15 August 2015). (Document) [117 2017/1]

SCL X (2014-2015), 239-254: Alagu Selvan Antony: A Juridical and Pastoral Reflection on the New Provisions of Juridical Procedures for The Marriage Tribunal. (Article) [117 2017/1]

SCL XIV (2019), 305-362: Merlin Rengith Ambrose: Right of Defence a Conditio sine qua non: A Critical Evaluation in the light of Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Peter O. Akpoghiran: Proofs in Marriage Nullity Process. (Book) (Ugbugbu Heritage, Richmond, Virginia, 2011) [106 2011/2]

Juan Ignacio Arrieta (ed.): L'istruzione Dignitas Connubii nella dinamica delle cause matrimoniali. (Book) (Marcianum, Venice, 2006) [101 2009/1]

Ernest Caparros – Luis Navarro – Thierry Sol (co-dir.): La réforme opérée par le m.p. Mitis Iudex. Commentaires et documentation. Actes d’un colloque organisé par la LUMSA Università et la Consociatio Internationalis Studio Iuris Canonici Promovendo, Rome, 30 novembre 2015. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2016) [117 2017/1]

Patricia M. Dugan – Luis Navarro: Matrimonial Law and Canonical Procedure. A Continuing Education Course. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2013) [110 2013/2]

Patricia M. Dugan – Luis Navarro – Ernest Caparros (eds.): The Reform Enacted by the m.p. Mitis Iudex. Commentaries and Documentation. Proceedings of a Conference organised by LUMSA Università and the Consociatio Internationalis Studio Iuris Canonici Promovendo, Rome, 30 November 2015. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2016) [117 2017/1]

Héctor Franceschi (ed.): Matrimonio e famiglia. La questione antropologica. (Book) (Pontificia Università della Santa Croce, Facoltà di Diritto Canonico, Rome, 2015) [114 2015/2]

Héctor Franceschi – Miguel A. Ortiz (eds.): Ius et Matrimonium II. Temi processuali e sostanziali alla luce del Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Book) (Pontificia Università della Santa Croce, Facoltà di Diritto Canonico, Rome, 2017) [119 2018/1]

Philippe Hallein: Le défenseur du lien dans les causes de nullité de mariage. (Book) (Pontificia Università Gregoriana, Rome, 2009) [103 2010/1]

Robert J. Kaslyn (ed.): Essays in Honor of Sister Rose McDermott, S.S.J. (Book) (Catholic University of America, 2010) [105 2011/1]

Lawrence G. Price – Daniel A. Smilanic – Victoria Vondenberger (eds): The Tribunal Handbook: Procedures for Formal Matrimonial Cases. (Book) (Canon Law Society of America, 2005) [95 2006/1]

Jesu Pudumai Doss – Giuseppe Duc Dung Do (eds.): Schola Humanitatis: Famiglia e matrimonio nella legislazione ecclesiale. Miscellanea in occasione del 75º della Facoltà di Diritto Canonico dell’UPS. (Book) (Libreria Ateneo Salesiano, Rome, 2016) [118 2017/2]

Jesu Pudumai Doss (ed.): Iustitiam persequere. Contributi del Codice Pio-Benedettino alla disciplina ecclesiastica. (Book) (Libreria Ateneo Salesiano, Rome, 2017) [122 2019/2]

Jesús Miñambres (ed.): Diritto canonico e culture giuridiche nel centenario del Codex Iuris Canonici del 1917. Atti del XVI Congresso Internazionale della Consociatio Internationalis Studio Iuris Canonici Promovendo, Roma 4-7 ottobre 2017. (Book) (EDUSC, Rome, 2019) [123 2020/1]

Michael Nobel: The Use of Means of Social Communication in the Context of Procedural Law. Questions and Suggestions on the Advantages of Using the Internet at Local Tribunals for Marriage Cases in the Canadian Context. (Book) (Wilson and Lafleur, Gratianus series, Montreal, 2021) [128 2022/2]

Paul Robbins: Second Marriage in the Catholic Church. ‘Annulment’ and other Solutions. (Book) (Amazon Fulfilment, Wrocław, 2019) [123 2020/1]

Canons 1671-1696

QDE 19 (2006), 70-92: Eugenio Zanetti: Consulenza e introduzione di una causa di nullità matrimoniale. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

QDE 19 (2006), 105-110: Eugenio Zanetti: Spirito e metodo richiesti ad un operatore pastorale e giuridico nell'accostarsi, nell'approfondire e nel valutare le vicende e le questioni matrimoniali. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

Canons 1671-1706

RDC 53 1/03, 159-174: Kurt Martens: Sacrement et contrat du point de vue de la procédure canonique. (Article) [94 2005/2]

Canons 1671-1707

AA XVIII (2012), 149-194: Velasio de Paolis: Los fundamentos del proceso matrimonial canónico según el Código de Derecho Canónico y la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [112 2014/2]

CLSN 160/09, 93-99: Peter Kravos: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2008. (Statistics) [106 2011/2]

CLSN 164/10, 99-105: Peter Kravos: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2009. (Statistics) [106 2011/2]

CLSN 168/11, 133-139: Peter Kravos: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2010. (Statistics) [110 2013/2]

CLSN 183/15, 70-78: Peter Kravos: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2013 & 2014. (Statistics) [116 2016/2]

CLSN 188/16, 71-75: Peter Kravos: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2015. (Statistics) [118 2017/2]

CLSN 192/18, 4-9: Peter Kravos: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2016. (Statistics) [121 2019/1]

CLSN 195/19, 3-8: Peter Kravos: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2017. (Statistics) [123 2020/1]

CLSN 199/21, 84-87: Peter Kravos: British & Irish Tribunal Statistics 2018 & 2019. (Statistics) [127 2022/1]

CLSN 200/21, 81-83: Simon Gillespie: British and Irish Tribunal Statistics 2020. (Statistics) [128 2022/2]

Canons 1671-1712

For XI 2/00, 465-466: Maltese Metropolitan Tribunal: Annual Report for 1999. (Report) [90 2003/2]

Canons 1671-1716

Comm 39 (2007), 291-312: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Processibus" (Sessio VIII). (Report) [105 2011/1]

Canon 1672

KIP 5 (18) 2016, nr. 2, 91-106: Igor Kilanowski: Właściwość sądu w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa (The competent tribunal in cases for declaring the nullity of marriage). (Article) [118 2017/2]

PCF VIII (2006), 205-230: Artemio Baluma: "An Act to Legalise Church Decisions of Nullity of Marriage for Civil Effects and Other Purposes". (Study) [98 2007/2]

QSR 18 (2008), 15-57: Joaquín Llobell: La competenza della Rota Romana nelle cause delle Chiese cattoliche orientali. (Article) [103 2010/1]

Canon 1673

Ap LXXXX (2017), 207-230: Émile Kouveglo: I fedeli laici e l’esercizio della potestà nella Chiesa. Status quaestionis e ricerca di una chiave funzionale di lettura. (Article) [121 2019/1]

Canonist 8/1 (2017), 124-134: Marcus Francis: What is the Potential for Collegial and Sole Lay Judges on Ecclesiastical Tribunals? (Article) [119 2018/1]

CLSN 127/02, 12-16: P. Allard: Competence and Canon 1673 4°. (Article) [88 2002/2]

DPM 1 (1994), 9-11: Karl-Theodor Geringer: Der Wohnsitz von Nichtkatholiken und die Zuständigkeit kirchlicher Ehegerichte. (Paper) [79 1998/1]

DPM 1 (1994), 219-231: Markus Walser: Die Zuständigkeit des kirchlichen Ehegerichts aufgrund des Wohn-oder Nebenwohnsitzes der nichtklagenden oder des Wohnsitzes der klagenden Partei. (Article) [79 1998/1]

IC XXXIV 68/94, 641-642: Decreto de la Signatura Apostólica de 6.V.1993. (Decree) [76 1996/2]

IC XXXIV 68/94, 643-650: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: Breve comentario al decreto general de la Signatura sobre el canon 1673 3º. (Article) [76 1996/2]

IC 63/126 (2023), 621-662: Carmen Peña: La mujer en la Iglesia Católica: situación canónica actual y perspectivas abiertas por la sinodalidad. (Article) [132 2024/2]

PCF XII (2010), 147-173: Augustine Mendonça: Admission/Rejection of an Introductory Libellus in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [108 2012/2]

Per 112 (2023), 689-699: Lorenzo Mancini: L’esercizio della potestà giudiziale nella Chiesa da parte dei fedeli laici. Sviluppo e interpretazione della normativa canonica. (Summary of doctoral thesis) [133 2025/1]

Proc CLSA 2004, 13-25: R. J Flummerfelt: Theology of Marriage: Complementarity between the Latin and Eastern Codes. (Address at the 2004 Convention of the Canon Law Society of America, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) [96 2006/2]

QDE 20 (2007), 156-166: Eugenio Zanetti: Fraudolenta sottrazione di cause matrimoniali ai competenti tribunali da parte di avvocati e procuratori (can. 1488 §2). (Article) [99 2008/1]

RMDC 19 (2013), 7-45: Luis de Jesús Hernández M.: La competencia del tribunal eclesiástico por los títulos del canon 1673, nn. 3 y 4. Estudio y análisis de los aspectos implicados. (Article) [112 2014/2]

RR 2004, 181-188: A. Mendonça: Tribunal Competence When Respondent's Whereabouts are Unknown. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

SC 41 (2007), 345-369: John Beal: When East Meets West: Tribunal Competence in Inter-Ritual Marriage Cases. (Article) [102 2009/2]

SCL I (2005), 463-466: A. Mendonça: Re-presentation of a Marriage Case after an Un-appealed Negative Decision. (Article) [96 2006/2]

SCL VI (2010), 437-444: Augustine Mendonça: To Which Tribunal May a Non-Catholic Present His Petition for Declaration of Nullity of His Marriage with a Catholic? (Article) [107 2012/1]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canon 1674

AA XVI (2009-2010), 311-322: Mónica Mercedes Villamil: El actor y el convenido en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [107 2012/1]

CLSN 159/09, 12-22: Paul Robbins: The Approach to a Particular Situation of Multiple Marriages. (Article) [106 2011/2]

IC XXXIV 68/94, 641-642: Decreto de la Signatura Apostólica de 6.V.1993. (Decree) [76 1996/2]

IC XXXIV 68/94, 653-659: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: Notas al decreto-declaración del STSA: la jurisdicción eclesiástica y los matrimonios de los acatólicos. (Article) [76 1996/2]

Per 99 (2010), 627-679: G. Paolo Montini: Il matrimonio tra acattolici di fronte al giudice ecclesiastico. Alcune note sull'article 3 §2 dell'istruzione Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [107 2012/1]

Per 100 (2011), 65-129: Edward N. Peters: On the impugnation of a marriage by a promoter of justice on the basis of crimen. (Article) [107 2012/1]

Canons 1674-1677

IC XLI 81/01, 169-189: Carlos José Errázuriz M.: Licitud moral de la presentación de la demanda de nulidad matrimonial por los esposos. (Article) [90 2003/2]

Canon 1675

Ap LXXVII 3-4 (2004), 759-771: Guido Lagomarsino: La trascrivibilità della sentenza canonica di nullità del matrimonio nell'ordinamento statuale post-mortem di un coniuge. (Article) [100 2008/2]

IC XLVI 91/06, 99-137: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: La introducción de la causa y la cesación de la instancia en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

Canon 1676

AA XXIII (2017, vol. I), 103-127: Paolo Bianchi: La scelta della forma processuale brevior nel can. 1676 §2: criteri e prassi concreta. (Article) [121 2019/1]

Ap LXXXX (2017), 615-627: Francesco Giammarresi: La formula nel Processo romano e in quello canonico. Tra veritas rei e moralis certitudo. (Article) [122 2019/2]

CLSN 129/02, 7-15: Address of the Dean of Rota to the Holy Father and Address of Pope John Paul II to the Rota, 28 January 2002. (Documents) [90 2003/2]

CLSN 129/02, 16-19: G. Read: Comment on Pope's Address. (Article) [90 2003/2]

DPM 9 (2002), 139-153: Z. Grocholewski: Der Dienst der Liebe in der kirchlichen Gerichtsbarkeit. (Lecture) [92 2004/2]

EE 84 (2009), 795-808: Pedro Garín Urionabarrenechea: Breves reflexiones acerca del canon 1676 del CIC/83. (Article) [104 2010/2]

FCan IV/1-2 (2009), 255-269: Pedro María Reyes Vizcaíno: Cuestiones morales en torno a la demanda de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [104 2010/2]

FCan V/1 (2010), 139-142: Justiça, caridade e verdade no ministério judicial. Discurso do Papa Bento XVI ao Tribunal da Rota Romana 29 Janeiro 2010. (Address) [105 2011/1]

FCan VI/2 (2011), 49-51: Elisa Araújo: Reconciliação Conjugal (Parte I): comentário aos cc. 1676 e 1695 CIC. (Commentary) [109 2013/1]

FCan VII/1 (2012), 79-81: Elisa Araújo: Reconciliação Conjugal (Parte II): comentários aos cc. 1676 e 1695 CIC. (Commentary) [110 2013/2]

For XVII/06, 385-434: Héctor Franceschi: "Bonum prolis" in the married state of life and the canonical consequences in case of separation or nullity of marriage. (Article) [100 2008/2]

IE XV 3/03, 615-656: J. Llobell: I tentativi di conciliazione, gli elementi sostanziali del libello di domanda e l'incidenza sul medesimo del concetto di "conformitas aequipollens" fra i capi di "accusa" nelle cause di nullità del matrimonio. (Lecture at the VII Incontro di aggiornamento, Erice, 2-6 June 2003) [93 2005/1]

IE XV 3/03, 657-690: S. Villeggiante: Ammissione del libello e contestuale citazione nelle cause di nullità matrimoniale: rilievi, critiche e proposte. (Lecture) [93 2005/1]

Per 110 (2021), 555-595: Marcelo Gidi: Il promotore di giustizia nella dinamica introduttiva del libello per la nuova procedura di dichiarazioni di nullità matrimoniale: una nuova opportunità per una retta amministrazione della giustizia. (Article) [128 2022/2]

RMDC 16 (2010), 141-147: Benedicto XVI: Alocución del Papa al inicio del año judicial, del 29 de enero de 2010. (Address) [105 2011/1]

Patrick R. Lagges: The Pastoral Work of Judges According to Paul VI, The Code of Canon Law, and "Dignitas Connubii". (Article in Victor G. D'Souza (ed.): In the Service of Truth and Justice [St Peter's Pontifical Institute, Bangalore, 2008], pp. 323-346) [101 2009/1]

Canon 1677

IM V 11/00, 139-150: R. Sobański: Orzekanie nieważności z dwu (lub więcej) tytułów wadliwego konsensu (Article) [86 2001/2]

QDE 20 (2007), 436-442: G. Paolo Montini: La formulazione del dubbio. (Article and documents) [102 2009/2]

QDE 22 (2009), 292-305: Tiziano Vanzetto: Devono durare anni le cause di nullità matrimoniale? Suggerimenti e proposte per un processo più celere. IV. La fase istruttoria e l'uditore. (Article) [104 2010/2]

QSR 21 (2011), 91-126: Elena Di Bernardo: Il nomen iuris tribuere da parte del giudice nelle cause di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [109 2013/1]

RR 2003, 96-98: Elissa A. Rinere: Multiple Grounds Only Partially Addressed. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

SC 30 1/96, 87-116: A. Mendonça: Practical Aspects of Using Multiple Grounds in Formal Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [77 1997/1]

SCL II (2006), 411-417: Augustine Mendonça: Correct "Formula of Doubt" in a Marriage Nullity Case. (Opinion) [98 2007/2]

SCL VIII (2012), 399-406: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Failure to Communicate the Formula of Doubt (cann. 1507, 1508, 1677; DC artt. 126, 127); Gathering of Evidence by the Defender of the Bond (can. 1561; DC art. 166); Failure to Provide an Advocate (cann. 1481-1482; DC artt. 101-103). (Violation of the Right of Defence, can. 1620, 7°; DC art 270, 7°). Decree coram Alwan, 19 May 2009 (India). (Decree) [111 2014/1]

Canon 1678

AC 64 (2023), 95-113: Christian Paponaud: L’obligation de recourir à un expert médical selon le canon 1678 §3. (Article) [133 2025/1]

Canonist 12/2 (2021), 256-286: Merlin Ambrose: The Significance of the Proof in the Instructional Phase: Canons 1526-1581, 1598-1600, 1678. (Article) [128 2022/2]

EIC 56 (2016), 449-486: Miguel Ángel Ortiz: La valutazione delle dichiarazioni delle parti nelle cause di nullità del matrimonio. (Article) [118 2017/2]

IC 57/114 (2017), 663-705: José Tomás Martín de Agar: El valor de la declaración de las partes en el proceso de nulidad. (Article) [120 2018/2]

IE XXXV (2023), 593-624: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Reg. Etrusci seu Fesulana – Nullità del matrimonio – Simulazione parziale del consenso matrimoniale – Esclusione del bonum sacramenti – Sentenza definitiva – 14 dicembre 2018 – Heredia Esteban, Ponente, con commento di Simona Maria Serena Salazar, La confessione giudiziale del presunto simulante dopo la promulgazione del m.p. Mitis Iudex Dominus lesus. (Sentence and comment) [132 2024/2]

Ius VI 2/15, 145-164: B. Tharakunnel: Forensic Psychiatry and the Role of Experts in Canon Law. (Article) [118 2017/2]

QDE 17 (2004), 210-223: Paolo Bianchi: Alcune annotazioni circa l'interrogatorio di parti e teste nelle cause di nullità di matrimonio. (Article) [93 2005/1]

QDE 18 (2005), 313-328: Paolo Bianchi: La fase istruttoria nel processo di nullità matrimoniale: non solo indagine. (Conference presentation) [96 2006/2]

RMDC 25/2 (2019), 247-273: Jorge Antonio Di Nicco: Pericia psicológica. Aspectos elementales. Análisis relacionado con el canon 1095 del Código de Derecho Canónico. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Canons 1678-1679

Per 109 (2020), 31-46: Gero P. Weishaupt: De partium depositionibus in Litteris Apostolicis, quae a verbis Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus incipiunt, motu proprio datis. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Canon 1679

Ap LXX 1-2 (1997), 225-250: J. Llobell: Foro interno e giurisdizione matrimoniale canonica. (Article) [81 1999/1]

Ap LXXVI 1-2 (2003), 475-501: M. Guida: Il teste di credibilità. (Article) [94 2005/2]

Ap LXXVI 1-2 (2003), 561-574: G. Leszczynski: La prova testimoniale. (Article) [94 2005/2]

Ap LXXXVII (2014), 607-626: Paolo Moneta: Protagonismo delle parti e discernimento processuale, tra forme e sostanza. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 7/1 (2016), 146-148: Decree coram Arokiaraj, 16 December 2015 (Brazil). Applicability of can. 1679 of Mitis Iudex. (Document) [117 2017/1]

DPM 15/16 (2008/2009), 335-351: Markus Walser: Die Parteierklärungen gem. Artt. 177-182 Dignitas Connubii, insbesondere die Präzisierungen zum gerichtlichen Geständnis in Art. 179 §2 Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [106 2011/2]

IE XV 1/03, 102-127: M. A. Ortiz: Il timore che invalida il matrimonio e la sua prova. (Commentary) [92 2004/2]

IE XIX 1/07, 137-176: Tribunale della Rota Romana. Reg. Insubris seu Mediolanen. Nullità del matrimonio. Simulazione parziale. Esclusione del bonum fidei. Sentenza definitiva, 22 giugno 2006, Caberletti, Ponente (con nota di M. A. Ortiz, La valutazione delle dichiarazioni delle parti e della loro credibilità). (Sentence and commentary) [100 2008/2]

Per LXXXIV 4/95, 735-755: M. Hilbert: Le dichiarazioni delle parti nel processo matrimoniale. (Presentation) [77 1997/1]

Per XCV 4/06, 647-674: Gero P. Weishaupt: De necessitate partium credibilitatis intrinsecae ad certitudinem moralem in causis matrimonialibus dipiscendam. (Article) [99 2008/1]

Canons 1679-1682

EIC 56 (2016), 405-448: Joaquín Llobell: Questioni circa l’appello e il giudicato nel nuovo processo matrimoniale. (Con brevi considerazioni sul “Tavolo di lavoro” per l’Italia). (Article) [118 2017/2]

IC 63/125 (2023), 143-180: Marc Teixidor: La posible y necesaria perentoriedad de los plazos de apelación contra una sentencia pro vinculo. (Article) [131 2024/1]

Ius Comm VII (2019), 275-325: Grzegorz Erlebach: La ejecutividad de la sentencia y del decreto de confirmación a la luz del Motu pr. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [124 2020/2]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 139-149: Henri Moreau: La sentence unique exécutoire en faveur de la nullité et les modalités d’appel à la lumière du motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [119 2018/1]

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 349-383: Mario Medina Balam: La sentencia, sus impugnaciones y su ejecución (Art. 4 Mitis Iudex; cc. 1679-1682). (Article) [118 2017/2]

Canon 1680

AA XI (2004), 185-210: C. Baccioli: Puntos fundamentales de la pericia psicólogo-psiquiatra en el proceso de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [95 2006/1]

AC 38 (1995-6), 183-96: M. F. Pompedda: Dialogue et collaboration entre les juges et les experts dans les causes de nullité de mariage. (Article) [79 1998/1]

AC 44 (2002), 189-202: B. de Lanversin: Enquête canonique et dossier medical: « le secret d'office ». (Article) [91 2004/1]

AnC 14 (2018), 271-290: Tomasz Rozkrut: Apelacja ze strony obrońcy węzła małżeńskiego we współczesnym zreformowanym procesie małżeńskim (Appeal by the defender of the bond in the modern reformed matrimonial process). (Article) [122 2019/2]

Ap LXXX 3-4 (2007), 775-802: Claudia Izzi: Personalismo cristiano e perizia psichica alla luce della recente Istruzione Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [101 2009/1]

Ap LXXXVI (2013), 353-386: Francesco Catozzella: La Perizia quale mezzo di prova nelle Cause di incapacità matrimoniale. (Article) [114 2015/2]

Canonist 7/1 (2016), 137-141: Decree coram Arokiaraj, 18 November 2015. Defect [Absence] of Canonical Form (cann. 1108, 1160). Confirmation of a First Instance Affirmative Sentence (cann. 1682, §2 CIC, 1680, §2 MI). (Document) [117 2017/1]

Canonist 10/2 (2019), 240-251: Decree coram Arellano Cedillo, 9 May 2017 (Italy), Appeal against the First Instance Affirmative Sentence (can. 1680 §2); Decree coram Arokiaraj, 16 May 2018 (Western Australia), Appeal against the First Instance Affirmative Sentence (can. 1680 §2); Decree coram da Costa Gomez, 11 July 2018 (Mumbai, India), Subjection of an Affirmative 1st Instance Sentence to Ordinary Examination in 2nd Grade (can. 1680 §2). (Documents) [124 2020/2]

DPM 9 (2002), 263-280: M. Pulte: Zur Frage des Erfordernisses von Sachverständigengutachten in den Fällen eines gravis defectus discretionis iudicii gem. c. 1095 n. 2 CIC/1983 – Prozessuale und materiell-rechtliche Aspekte. (Article) [92 2004/2]

For IX 1/98, 35-38: Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura: Question regarding the use of the expert in marriage nullity cases. (Reply) [82 1999/2]

For IX 2/98, 51-57: Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura: Use of Expert in marriage nullity cases. (Reply). [83 2000/1]

IM I 6-7/96, 137-142: W. Krupa: Zasady opracowywania opinii biegłego psychologa w sprawach o nieważność maIżeństwa. (Article) [80 1998/2]

Ius Comm V (2017), 65-87: Grzegorz Erlebach: Algunas cuestiones sobre la apelación en las causas de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [119 2018/1]

Ius Comm VI (2018), 137-183: Romanae Rotae Tribunal: Decreto coram Todisco, 23 junio 2016. Nulidad de matrimonio. Cuestión preliminar: admisión de la apelación / confirmación de la sentencia; Santiago Panizo Orallo: Comentario al Decreto. (Decree and comment) [121 2019/1]

PCF XI (2009), 7-11: Pope Benedict XVI: Address to the Members of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota. (Address) [103 2010/1]

Per 105 (2016), 663-699: G. Paolo Montini: Si appellatio mere dilatoria evidenter appareat (can. 1680 §2 e 1687 §4 MIDI): alcune considerazioni. (Conference presentation) [120 2018/2]

Per 106 (2017), 301-339: G. Paolo Montini: Il difensore del vincolo e l’obbligo dell’appello. (Conference presentation) [120 2018/2]

Per 110 (2021), 145-153: Romanae Rotae Tribunal: Decretum coram R. P. D. Gregorio Erlebach, diei 22 iulii 2019, in una Nullitatis matrimonii; Praeiud: Querelae nullitatis et Novae causae propositionis. (Decree) [128 2022/2]

Per 110 (2021), 225-230: Gianpaolo Montini: I termini per l’appello contro una sentenza negativa di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [128 2022/2]

SC 35 (2001), 33-58: A. Mendonça: The Apostolic Signatura's Recent Declaration on the Necessity of Using Experts in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [87 2002/1]

SC 50 (2016), 383-452: William Daniel: The Appellatio Mere Dilatoria in Causes of Nullity of Marriage. A Contribution to the General Theory of the Appeal against a Definitive Sentence. (Article) [118 2017/2]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canon 1681

Comm 37 (2005), 107-112: Pontificium Consilium de Legum Textibus: Nota Explicativa: Responsum ad tres quaestiones propositas circa clausulam "de consensus partium" can. 1681 CIC. (Note) [104 2010/2]

IC XLVI 91/06, 99-137: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: La introducción de la causa y la cesación de la instancia en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

Ius Comm VIII (2020), 73-98: Paolo Bianchi: La nova causae propositio después de la reforma procesal del 2015. (Article) [125 2021/1]

J 79 (2023), 41-98: William L. Daniel: The New Proposition of a Cause of Matrimonial Nullity before the Local Appellate Tribunal (cf. CIC c. 1681; CCEO c. 1367). (Article) [131 2024/1]

SCL III (2007), 41-52: Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts: Explanatory Note: Answer to 3 Questions concerning the Interpretation of the Clause de consensu partium of CIC Canon 1681. (Document) [100 2008/2]

Canons 1681-1685

REDC 62 (2005), 459-500: José Francisco Castelló Colomer: El doble grado de jurisdicción y la doble sentencia conforme. (Article) [98 2007/2]

Canon 1682

Ap LXXXII 3-4 (2009), 563-596: Elena di Bernardo: Conformità delle Sentenze quale "responsabilità" condivisa. Il Giudizio di conferma ed il Giudizio sulla conformità nelle Cause matrimoniali. (Article) [106 2011/2]

EIC 62 (2022), 199-232: Fabio Fornalè: La rimozione del veto a contrarre nuove nozze con particolare riferimento al ruolo della coscienza morale dell’Ordinario del luogo. (Article) [129 2023/1]

FT 18 (2007), 147-170: Markus Müller: Die Berufung im kanonischen Prozessrecht. (Article) [101 2009/1]

IE XVIII 2/06, 439-463: Grzegorz Erlebach: L'impugnazione della sentenza e l'invio "ex officio" della causa al tribunale di appello nell'istr. Dignitas connubii. (Lecture) [98 2007/2]

LJ 165 (2010), 117-123: Helen Costigane – James B. Hurley: Why Have a Tribunal of Second Instance? (Article) [106 2011/2]

ME CXXII 2/97, 311-322: S. Villeggiante: Querela di nullità e contestuale appello contra la sentenza affermativa di primo grado. (Article) [79 1998/1]

PCF XIII (2011), 309-323: Decision coram Stankiewicz: Incapacity to Assume the Essential Obligations of Marriage: Anti-social Personality Disorder (27 March 1998, Leeds). English trans. by Rev. Augustine Mendonça, JCD. (Sentence) [111 2014/1]

Proc CLSA 2010, 142-174: William L. Daniel: The Notion of Moral Certitude with Particular Application to the Acts Mentioned in Canon 1682 §2 (CCEO, c. 1368 §2). (Lecture) [110 2013/2]

QDE 22 (2009), 318-224: G. Paolo Montini: L'appello in una causa di nullità matrimoniale. (Conference presentation) [104 2010/2]

QDE 27 (2014) 158-186: Bassiano Ugge: Il decreto di conferma di una sentenza affermativa. (Article) [113 2015/1]

QDE 27 (2014) 187-221: Paolo Bianchi: Il decreto di ammissione di una causa di nullità matrimoniale all'esame ordinario in secondo grado di giudizio. (Article) [113 2015/1]

QDE 27 (2014), 314-320: Paolo Bianchi: Snellimento della prassi canonica in ordine alla dichiarazione di nullità del vincolo matrimoniale? /2. (Article) [114 2015/2]

QSR 18 (2008), 59-95: Relazione sull'attività della Rota Romana nell'anno giudiziario 2007. (Report) [103 2010/1]

RDC 68/1 (2018), 107-139: Marie-Élisabeth Fady: Le vetitum apposé à une sentence déclarant nul un mariage: entre difficultés canoniques et enjeux pastoraux. (Article) [123 2020/1]

REDC 61 (2004), 315-340: Tribunal del Arzobispado de Santiago de Compostela, c. Calvo Tojo, 29 de noviembre de 2003. Nulidad de matrimonio (exclusión del matrimonio e incapacidad para asumir las obligaciones). (Sentence) [94 2005/2]

RR 2003, 98-102: A. Mendonça: Invalidity of a Decree Confirming the First Instance Affirmative Sentence. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

RR 2003, 102-104: A. Mendonça: Transmission of the Acts After a First Affirmative Decision. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

RR 2004, 170-172: Elissa A. Rinere: Lack of Competence and Action of Appellate Court. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

SC 34 (2000), 518-528: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Boccafola, 12 March 1998. (Jurisprudence) [86 2001/2]

SC 36 (2002), 343-418: A. Mendonça: Jurisprudential Approaches to Equivalent or Substantial Conformity of Sentences in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [91 2004/1]

SC 45 (2011), 67-120: William L. Daniel: Motives in decernendo for Admitting a Cause of Marriage Nullity to an Ordinary Examination. (Article) [108 2012/2]

SC 49 (2015), 613-642: Lynda Robitaille: The Formulation of the Doubt: The Essential Link between First and Second Instance Decisions. (Article) [115 2016/1]

SCL I (2005), 95-146: A. Mendonça: Recent Rotal Jurisprudence on Marriage Nullity Cases Judged in Accord with Canon 1682, §2. (Article) [96 2006/2]

SCL I (2005), 359-402: A. Mendonça: Substantive and Procedural Jurisprudence of the Roman Rota as Reported in its Relazione Annuale 2004. (Article) [96 2006/2]

SCL V (2009), 493-510: Augustine Mendonça: Irremediable Nullity of a Negative Sentence in Second Instance. (Opinion) [105 2011/1]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1682-1683

ME CXXIII 2/98, 295-378: S. Villeggiante: La conformità delle sentenze affermative nel processo canonico di nullità matrimoniale. (Article) [82 1999/2]

Canons 1682-1684

AnCan (Chile), I (2015), 233-359: XXIX Jornadas de la Asociación Chilena de Derecho Canónico, julio 2014. (Compilation) [116 2016/2]

DPM 14 (2007), 217-240: Verena Feldhans: Die Berufung im Ehenichtigkeitsprozess. Ein Vergleich von Codex Iuris Canonici und Dignitas Connubii. (Article) [102 2009/2]

RR 2004, 177-181: A. Mendonça: Substantial or Equivalent Conformity of Sentences. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

SC 32 (1998), 239-243: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Cormac Burke, 14 December 1995, Toronto (ON), Canada, nullity of marriage. (Jurisprudence) [81 1999/1]

SC 32 (1998), 243-252: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Cormac Burke, 18 July 1996, São Sebastião de Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, nullity of marriage. (Jurisprudence) [81 1999/1]

SC 32 (1998), 441-500: A. Mendonça: The Structural and Functional Aspects of an Appeal Tribunal in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [82 1999/2]

SC 37 3/01, 163-174: R. Jacques: Droit de la défense de présenter de nouvelles preuves en appel. (Judicial Chronicle) [92 2004/2]

Canon 1683

ADC 7 (abril 2018), 81-107: José T. Martín de Agar: Aspectos sustantivos de la reforma del Motu proprio Mitis Iudex. (Article) [121 2019/1]

Ap LXXXIX (2016), 509-544: Francesco Catozzella: La durata della convivenza coniugale. Valore probatorio alla luce della Giurisprudenza rotale. (Article) [121 2019/1]

For IX 2/98, 117-143: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Nullity of Marriage. Before Burke. Definitive Sentence 12 December 1996. (Sentence) [83 2000/1]

IC 56/111 (2016), 157-192: Javier Ferrer Ortiz: Valoración de las circunstancias que pueden dar lugar al proceso abreviado. (Article) [117 2017/1]

IE VIII 2/96, 689-711: J. Llobell: Il tribunale competente per l'appello della sentenza di nullità del matrimonio giudicata «tamquam in prima instantia ex can. 1683». (Commentary) [79 1998/1]

IE IX 1/97, 377-381: Segretaria di Stato: Rescritto «ex audientia Sanctissimi» di conferma di alcune «facoltà straordinarie» al Decano della Rota Romano, 30 settembre 1995 (con nota di J. Canosa). (Document and commentary) [80 1998/2]

IE XVI 3/04, 681-708: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana. Inter. Bonaëren. seu Moronen. (Argentina). Nullitas matrimonii. Incid. nullitatis sententiae. Decreto. 4 marzo 2004. Turnaturi, Ponente (con nota di F. Pappadia: Circa la competenza del tribunale d'appello nelle cause di nullità del matrimonio ex cann. 1683, 1524 §1 e 1637 §3). (Sentence and commentary) [95 2006/1]

IE XXIV 3/12, 625-642: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Reg. Apuli seu Brundusina-Ostunen. Nullità del matrimonio. Ammissione di un nuovo capo. Decreto, 31 ottobre 2011. Jaeger, Ponente (con nota di Massimo del Pozzo, La discrezionalità nell'ammissione di un nuovo capo di nullità in appello). (Sentence and comment) [110 2013/2]

IE XXXV (2023), 9-30: Daniel Moreira Miguel: I rerum personarumque adiuncta e i requisiti materiali d’ammissione nel processus matrimonialis brevior coram episcopo (can. 1683, 2). (Article) [131 2024/1]

IM 34 (2023), nr 1, 129-148: Jerzy Adamczyk: Rola biskupa diecezjalnego w procesie skróconym o nieważność małżeństwa (The role of the diocesan bishop in the abbreviated process for nullity of marriage). (Article) [131 2024/1]

Ius Comm V (2017), 47-63: Antoni Stankiewicz: Algunas consideraciones en torno al ejercicio personal y vicario de la potestad judicial con referencia al proceso matrimonial más breve ante el obispo diocesano. (Article) [119 2018/1]

J 70 (2010), 368-395: John P. Beal: What is an Appellate Court to do? Procedural Considerations when Declaring Equivalent Conformity of Sentences. (Article) [106 2011/2]

Per 105 (2016), 395-415: G. Paolo Montini: L’accordo dei coniugi quale presupposto del processus matrimonialis brevior. (Presentation) [118 2017/2]

QDE 32 (2019), 448-507: Paolo Bianchi: Questioni legate alla scelta della via processuale nel nuovo processo di nullità matrimoniale: la evidenza del motivo di nullità (can. 1683, 2º e art. 14 RP). (Article) [124 2020/2]

REDC 63 (2006), 371-375: c. Juan José García Faílde: Tribunal de la Rota de la Nunciatura Apostólica, nulidad de matrimonio (incidente procesal de admisión de un nuevo capítulo de nulidad matrimonial en apelación), decreto del 24 de febrero de 2000. (Sentence) [99 2008/1]

SCL IV (2008), 361-372: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Exclusion of Indissolubility (Decree Submitting the Case to an Ordinary Examination): decree coram Turnaturi, 15 February 2001. (Decree) [102 2009/2]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1683-1684

QDE 32 (2019), 215-250: Donatella Saroglia: L’istanza del bene dei fedeli: il ruolo dell’avvocato. (Article) [124 2020/2]

Canons 1683-1687

AA XXII (2016), 169-230: Luis de Ruschi: El processus brevior del motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Jesus. (Article) [118 2017/2]

AA XXIII (2017, vol. II), 77-99: Luigi Sabbarese: La riforma del processo matrimoniale canonico tra snellimento e tutela del favor matrimonii. (Article) [121 2019/1]

AA XXIII (2017, vol. I), 103-127: Paolo Bianchi: La scelta della forma processuale brevior nel can. 1676 §2: criteri e prassi concreta. (Article) [121 2019/1]

AA XXIII (2017, vol. I), 157-181: Alejandro W. Bunge: La aplicación del proceso matrimonial más breve ante el obispo. (Article) [121 2019/1]

AC 57 (2016), 185-210: Bruno Gonçalves: Le procès matrimonial plus bref devant l’Évêque diocésain: présentation et mise en lumière de quelques enjeux. (Article) [120 2018/2]

AC 61 (2020-2021), 207-220: Jean-Jacques Boyer: Au sujet du procès matrimonial plus bref devant l’évêque diocésain. Quelques points de tension et de résolution. (Article) [129 2023/1]

AC 64 (2023), 75-94: Gian Paolo Montini: Le procès plus bref devant l’évêque diocésain: état des lieux depuis le motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [133 2025/1]

ADC 5 supl. (octubre 2016), 97-122: Felipe Heredia Esteban: El proceso más breve ante el Obispo. (Conference presentation) [118 2017/2]

BV 76 (2016), 607-619: Sebastijan Valentan: Prenova kanonskega postopka v ničnostnih zakonskih pravdah in pojasnila Papeškega sveta za zakonska besedila (The reform of the canonical procedure for marriage nullity and clarifications by the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts). (Article) [120 2018/2]

CLSN 185/16, 36-41: Paul Gargaro: Mitis Iudex and Diocesan Administrators. (Article) [117 2017/1]

CLSN 188/16, 59-70; also Ius VI 2/15, 165-178: Leszek Adamowicz: The Circumstances of Things and Persons that can allow a Case for Nullity of Marriage (Mitis Iudex – “The way of proceeding…,” Art. 14). (Article) [118 2017/2]

CLSN 192/18, 10-40: Paul Coyle: An Examination of the Processus Brevior or Briefer Matrimonial Process before the Bishop in the motu proprio, Mitis Iudex. (Article) [121 2019/1]

EE 92 (2017), 603-641: Cristina Guzmán Pérez: Instrucción y decisión de la causa en el proceso abreviado ante el obispo. Práctica de los tribunales eclesiásticos españoles. (Article) [120 2018/2]

FCan XI/2 (2016), 7-24: Manuel Arroba Conde: O processo mais breve diante do bispo. (Article) [118 2017/2]

FCan XII/2 (2017), 61-80: P. Manuel J. Rocha: O processo brevior diante do Bispo diocesano. (Article) [122 2019/2]

FCan XVIII/1 (2023), 9-46: João Pedro Bizarro: Exame das primeiras trinta sentenças de “processus brevior” que obtiveram o decreto de executividade do Tribunal da Assinatura Apostólica. [132 2024/2]

IC 56/111 (2016), 135-155: Gerardo Núñez: El proceso brevior: exigencias y estructura. (Article) [117 2017/1]

IC 57/113 (2017), 45-81: Juan Ignacio Bañares: El artículo 14 de las reglas de procedimiento del M. P. Mitis Iudex. Supuestos de hecho y causas de nulidad. (Article) [119 2018/1]

IC 58/115 (2018), 185-221: Aurora Mª López Medina: El Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex dos años después. Experiencias de su aplicación en España en materia de la investigación prejudicial o pastoral previa al proceso de nulidad matrimonial y la práctica del proceso brevior. (Article) [121 2019/1]

IC 60/119 (2020), 197-242: Massimo del Pozzo: Il ruolo del Difensore del vincolo nel ‘processus matrimonialis brevior’. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Ius Comm V (2017), 89-114: José Luis López Zubillaga: El nuevo proceso más breve ante el obispo. (Article) [119 2018/1]

Ius Comm VI (2018), 285-331: Paolo Bianchi: La elección de la forma procesal brevior. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Ius Comm VII (2019), 61-73: Antoni Stankiewicz: Breves anotaciones sobre las Reglas de procedimiento y sobre la relevancia jurídica de las circunstancias con referencia a la falta de fe personal en relación con la simulación del consentimiento en el proceso brevior (art. 14 §1 RP). (Article) [123 2020/1]

IusM XI/2017, 139-161: Benedict N. Ejeh: La relazione tra fede e sacramento a partire dall’art. 14 delle Regole procedurali del m.p. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [120 2018/2]

J 75 (2015), 539-591: William L. Daniel: The Abbreviated Matrimonial Process before the Bishop in Cases of "Manifest Nullity" of Marriage. (Article) [116 2016/2]

J 76 (2016), 231-265: Ronny E. Jenkins: Applying Article 14 of Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus to the Processus Brevior in Light of the Church’s Constant and Common Jurisprudence on Nullity of Consent. (Article) [117 2017/1]

KIP 6 (19) 2017, nr. 1, 195-208: Agnieszka Freliszka: Proces skrócony według motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus (The briefer process in the motu proprio “Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus”). (Article) [119 2018/1]

KIP 6 (19) 2017, nr. 2, 191-205: Aleksandra Rybaczek: Proces skrócony o nieważność małżeństwa przed biskupem (The briefer marriage nullity process before the bishop). (Article) [120 2018/2]

KIP 7 (20) 2018, nr. 1, 221-235: Aleksandra Rybaczek: Specyfika wyrokowania w kanonicznym procesie skróconym o nieważność małżeństwa (Specificity of sentence processing in the briefer canonical process of nullity of marriage). (Article) [121 2019/1]

KIP 8 (21) 2019, nr 1, 169-186: Wojciech Góralski: Processus brevior coram Episcopo – czy zupełne novum? (Processus brevior coram Episcopo – a complete novelty?). (Article) [123 2020/1]

Per 106 (2017), 29-56: Damián G. Astigueta: Riflessioni a proposito della natura giuridica del processo più breve. (Article) [120 2018/2]

Per 108 (2019), 35-72: G. Paolo Montini: L’uso illegittimo del processus brevior. Rimedi processuali ordinari e straordinari. (Presentation) [124 2020/2]

Per 109 (2020), 365-398: Marcelo Gidi: La sinergia procesal «pro veritate et iustitia» en las actuaciones del vicario judicial y del defensor del vínculo en la introducción del libelo para el processus matrimonialis brevior. (Article) [128 2022/2]

QDE 31 (2018), 470-491: Adolfo Zambon: Questioni relative al processus brevior: il libello e l’istruttoria. (Article) [122 2019/2]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 121-138: Engelbert Frank: Juger ou faire juger: l’Évêque diocésain juge dans le procès plus bref et le nouveau rôle du Vicaire judiciaire à la lumière du motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus. (Article) [119 2018/1]

RDC 67/1 (2017), 219-227: Raphaël Willot: Premiers procès plus brefs dans les diocèses de l’Officialité de Lille. (Article) [119 2018/1]

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 339-348: Guillermo Rodríguez R.: Del proceso de nulidad matrimonial más breve ante el Obispo. Elementos estructurales. (Article) [118 2017/2]

RMDC 24/2 (2018), 271-321: Mario Medina Balam: La sacramentalidad del matrimonio como objeto del error determinante de la voluntad y de la exclusión ante el proceso brevior de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [123 2020/1]

SC 52 (2018), 283-317: Armand Paul Bosso: La certitude morale dans le processus brevior: nouvelle dynamique ou constance de la doctrine canonique? (Article) [122 2019/2]

Canon 1684

AC 54 (2012), 311-332: Maurice Bouvier: Le vetitum, ou interdiction, judiciaire de nouvelles noces et sa levée. (Article) [114 2015/2]

CLSN 131/02, 54-58: Canadian Conference of Bishops: Proposals on Restrictive Clauses. (Document) [90 2003/2]

DPM 2 (1995), 295-299: Dominicus M. Meier: Die Antwort des Höchsten Gerischtes der Apostolischen Signatur vom 1 Februar 1990 auf eine vorgelegte Frage zu c. 1684 CIC. (Article) [79 1998/1]

EE 88 (2013), 753-765: Laura Armentia Espigares: Algunas cuestiones prácticas acerca del veto judicial en las causas de nulidad matrimonial. (Article) [112 2014/2]

FCan X/1 (2015), 17-28: Carlos Morán Bustos: El veto: el art. 251 de la Dignitas Connubii y su armonización con la disciplina del CIC'83. (Article) [115 2016/1]

IE XIII 3/01, 675-691: M. F. Pompedda: L'amministrazione della giustizia nella Chiesa. (Lecture) [89 2003/1]

IE XV 1/03, 237-250: R. Funghini: Considerazioni sulla doppia sentenza conforme (a proposito del volume di AA. VV., La doppia sentenza conforme nel processo matrimoniale: problemi e prospettive). (Book Presentation) [92 2004/2]

IE XX 1/08, 159-178: Carlo Montalenti: Alcune osservazioni sull'Istruzione «Dignitas connubii» e il divieto di passare a nuove nozze imposto tramite sentenza o decreto. (Article) [102 2009/2]

IM III 9/98, 45-59: R. Sobański: Uwagi o funkcji sędziego w procesie o nieważność małżeństwa. (Article) [83 2000/1]

Per XCV 3/06, 483-551: G. Paolo Montini: Alcune questioni processuali intorno alla decretazione di conformità equivalente. (Conference presentation) [99 2008/1]

Proc CLSA 2005, 225-230: Kenneth K. Schwanger: Fulfillment of the cautions and prohibitions in the preparation for marriage of those in the RCIA: An examination of the nature and use of the vetita in tribunal practice with an eye toward practical pastoral implications. (Seminar paper) [101 2009/1]

QDE 25 (2012), 244-250: Pierantonio Pavanello: La rimozione del vetitum, la convalidazione del matrimonio e la separazione. (Article) [109 2013/1]

QDE 27 (2014) 222-226: Pierantonio Pavanello: Nota sulla sentenza nel processo di appello. (Article) [113 2015/1]

REDC 71 (2014), 559-614: Julio García Martín: Il vetitum di contrarre matrimonio ai sensi dei cann. 1077 e 1684, §1. (Article) [114 2015/2]

SC 36 (2002), 343-418: A. Mendonça: Jurisprudential Approaches to Equivalent or Substantial Conformity of Sentences in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [91 2004/1]

SC 38 (2004), 329-344: A. Mendonça: Equivalent Conformity of Sentences in a Marriage Nullity Process: A Case Study. (Article) [95 2006/1]

SC 46 (2012), 525-526: Roman Rota, Removal of a Vetitum. Decree coram Boccafola, 6 April 1992 (Rome). (Document) [110 2013/2]

SC 46 (2012), 527-530: Roman Rota, Removal of a Vetitum. Decree coram Funghini, 20 July 1994 (Rome). (Document) [110 2013/2]

SCL VI (2010), 269-334: Augustine Mendonça: Juridical and Pastoral Aspect of a Judicial Vetitum. (Article) [107 2012/1]

SCL VI (2010), 383-388: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota: Removal of a Vetitum. Decree coram Bottone, 20 January 2009 (Italy). (Decree) [107 2012/1]

SO XXX (2002), 467-477: A. Pérez Díaz: El veto en las sentencias de nulidad matrimonial y su remoción en la Archidiócesis de Oviedo. (Article) [91 2004/1]

Canons 1684-1685

AnCan (Chile), I (2015), 5-143: XXVII Jornadas de la Asociación Chilena de Derecho Canónico, julio 2012. (Compilation) [116 2016/2]

J 72 (2012), 377-427: John P. Beal: The Tribunal Vetitum: A Practice in Search of a Theory. (Article) [111 2014/1]

QDE 19 (2006), 93-104: Paolo Bianchi: L'incapacità psichica. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

QDE 22 (2009), 306-317: Tiziano Vanzetto: Il divieto di passare a nuove nozze. (Conference presentation) [104 2010/2]

SC 31 (1997), 147-191: Michael Smith Foster: Divorce and Remarriage: What about the children? Canons 1071, 1077, 1684, 1685, 1689. (Article) [79 1998/1]

SC 38 (2004), 37-64: L. Robitaille: The Vetitum and Monitum: Consequences of Marriage Nullity or Pastoral Preparation for a New Marriage? (Article) [95 2006/1]

Canons 1685-1687

QDE 32 (2019), 360-379: Fabio Franchetto: Il ruolo dell’istruttore e dell’assessore nel processo breve. (Article) [124 2020/2]

REDC 73 (2016), 181-206: Julio García Martín: Alcune considerazioni sui concetti «istruttore» e «uditore» e sull’espressione «giudice istruttore». (Article) [117 2017/1]

Canon 1686

Ap LXXXVII (2014), 207-271: Ivica Ivanković Radak: L'accertamento dello stato libero per il Matrimonio tra i fedeli della Chiesa cattolica e della Chiesa Ortodossa Serba. Gli effetti processuali della nullità del Matrimonio, della Separazione e del Divorzio. (Article) [115 2016/1]

IC XLVII 93/07, 177-214: Paola Buselli Mondin: L'assenza della forma canonica preclude l'operatività del processo di nullità matrimoniale? Un'ipotesi. (Article) [99 2008/1]

IE XXX (2018), 625-632: Pablo Gefaell: L’Abrogazione della sufficienza dell’investigazione prematrimoniale per dichiarare lo stato libero dei cattolici orientali sposati civilmente, operata dal m. p. Mitis et Misericors Iesus. (Article) [122 2019/2]

QDE 25 (2012), 134-154: G. Paolo Montini: Il motu proprio Omnium in mentem e il matrimonio canonico. (Article) [109 2013/1]

REDC 51 (1994), 847-855: Tribunal Interdiocesano de Primera Instancia de Sevilla. Nulidad de matrimonio (Impedimento de ligamen). Coram A. González Martín. (Sentence) [76 1996/2]

REDC 62 (2005), 333-336: Tribunal de la Archidiócesis de Madrid, 3 de marzo de 2005: nulidad de matrimonio (proceso documental), coram Francisco Mora Quintana. (Sentence) [97 2007/1]

SC 29 (1995), 515-531: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Antoni Stankiewicz, 15 December 1992, nullity of marriage. (Sentence) [76 1996/2]

SC 29 (1995), 531-538: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Antoni Stankiewicz, 15 December 1992, Rockville Centre, nullity of marriage. (Sentence) [76 1996/2]

SC 29 (1995), 539-546: Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota, coram Kenneth E. Boccafola, 22 October 1992, Mexico, nullity of marriage. (Sentence) [76 1996/2]

SC 30 2/96, 487-511: P. López Gallo: Do Multiple Marriages Abolish the Documentary Process of ligamen? (Article) [78 1997/2]

SC 32 (1998), 501-504: Vancouver (British Columbia), Canada, coram Pedro Lopez Gallo, 28 December 1995, marriage nullity, documentary process (prot. no. 55/95). (Judicial decree) [82 1999/2]

SC 33 (1999), 229-232: Vancouver Regional Tribunal (Vancouver-X.), coram Pedro López Gallo, 15 October 1998, nullity of marriage (documentary process: invalid delegation). (Jurisprudence) [83 2000/1]

SC 34 (2000), 528-533: Diocesan Tribunal of Peoria, coram Soseman, 14 September 1999. (Jurisprudence) [86 2001/2]

Canons 1686-1687

QDE 32 (2019), 322-359: Concetta Caviglia: L’istanza del bene del matrimonio: il ruolo del difensore del vincolo. (Article) [124 2020/2]

Canons 1686-1688

Comm 40 (2008), 348-376: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Processibus" (Sessio XII). (Report) [106 2011/2]

DPM 9 (2002), 27-36: M. Hilbert: De Processu Documentali pro Causis Nullitatis Matrimonii: Historische Entwicklung 1917-1971. (Article) [92 2004/2]

For XVII/06, 385-434: Héctor Franceschi: "Bonum prolis" in the married state of life and the canonical consequences in case of separation or nullity of marriage. (Article) [100 2008/2]

IC XXXVII 73/97, 123-150: Santiago Panizo Orallo: El proceso documental en supuestos de defecto de forma. (Article) [80 1998/2]

RDC 51 1/01, 141-161: Edoardo Dieni: L'arrêt Pellegrini contre Italie de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. (Article) [89 2003/1]

REDC 61 (2004), 287-300: Tribunal Interdiocesano de Primera Instancia de Sevilla, c. Gil Delgado, 12 de noviembre de 1999. Nulidad de matrimonio, proceso documental (impedimento de impotencia). (Sentence) [94 2005/2]

Canon 1687

Ap XCI (2018), 187-218: Federica Inches: Il ruolo del Difensore del vincolo nella riforma del Codice di Diritto Canonico del 1983 col m.p. Mitis Iudex del 2015. (Article) [123 2020/1]

Per 105 (2016), 663-699: G. Paolo Montini: Si appellatio mere dilatoria evidenter appareat (can. 1680 §2 e 1687 §4 MIDI): alcune considerazioni. (Conference presentation) [120 2018/2]

Canon 1688

KIP 6 (19) 2017, nr. 2, 207-227: Wojciech Witkowski: Dawne i obecne umocowania prawne procesu dokumentalnego (Old and current juridical powers of the documentary process). (Article) [120 2018/2]

Per 111 (2022), 421-443: Paolo Bianchi: Il processo documentale e il tribunale interdiocesano. (Article) [130 2023/2]

Canons 1688-1690

Per 110 (2021), 439-457: G. Paolo Montini: Il processo documentale nel diritto processuale canonico. Il contributo del Prof. Piero Antonio Bonnet (1979-2008). (Essay) [128 2022/2]

RMDC 21/1 (2015), 385-407: Ana Isabel Romero Ugalde: El proceso documental (Art. 6 Mitis Iudex; cc. 1688-1690). (Article) [118 2017/2]

Canons 1688-1691

J 75 (2015), 467-538: John P. Beal: Mitis Iudex Canons 1671–1682, 1688–1691: A Commentary. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Canon 1689

AC 54 (2012), 311-332: Maurice Bouvier: Le vetitum, ou interdiction, judiciaire de nouvelles noces et sa levée. (Article) [114 2015/2]

CLSN 136/03, 24-27: G. Read: A Recent Rotal Decision: coram Stankiewicz (25.11.99). (Commentary) [92 2004/2]

CLSN 162/10, 39-41: John Jukes: Obligations Following Nullity Decree. The Implementation of CIC 1689. (Article) [106 2011/2]

PCF VIII (2006), 205-230: Artemio Baluma: "An Act to Legalise Church Decisions of Nullity of Marriage for Civil Effects and Other Purposes". (Study) [98 2007/2]

SC 31 (1997), 147-191: Michael Smith Foster: Divorce and Remarriage: What about the children? Canons 1071, 1077, 1684, 1685, 1689. (Article) [79 1998/1]

Canon 1691

IM 34 (2023), nr 2, 33-45: Rafał Dappa: Bonum familiae w kontekście przemówienia papieża Franciszka na rozpoczęcie roku sądowego Trybunału Roty Rzymskiej z dnia 29 stycznia 2021 roku (“Bonum familiae” in the context of Pope Francis’ speech at the beginning of the judicial year of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota on 29 January 2021). (Article) [132 2024/2]

OAK XLII 2/93, 418-436: F. Bernhard: Zur Frage der Anwendbarkeit der Urteilsnichtigkeitsgründe des ordentlichen Streitverfahrens auf den Ehenichtigkeitsprozeß. (Article) [77 1997/1]

SC 52 (2018), 407-441: William L. Daniel: The Universality of the Ordo Iudiciarius of the Church. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Canon 1692

CLSN 113/98, 40-48: P. Hayward: Family Law Reform and the Civil Effects of Nullity and Separation. (Article) [81 1999/1]

IE XIII 2/01, 347-367: G. dalla Torre: L'attività giudiziale nello Stato della Città del Vaticano e la Legge Fondamentale. (Lecture) [89 2003/1]

PCF VIII (2006), 205-230: Artemio Baluma: "An Act to Legalise Church Decisions of Nullity of Marriage for Civil Effects and Other Purposes". (Study) [98 2007/2]

QSR 18 (2008), 15-57: Joaquín Llobell: La competenza della Rota Romana nelle cause delle Chiese cattoliche orientali. (Article) [103 2010/1]

Canons 1692-1696

QDE 13 (2000), 146-168: Paolo Bianchi: Processi e procedimenti canonici per la separazione personale dei coniugi. (Article) [85 2001/1]

QDE 13 (2000), 169-191: Giovanni Maragnoli: La separazione personale dei coniugi tra legge della Chiesa e legge dello Stato in Italia. (Article) [85 2001/1]

Canons 1692-1706

Comm 40 (2008), 143-165: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Processibus" (Sessio XI). (Report) [106 2011/2]

Canons 1692-1707

Piero Amenta: Administrative Procedures in Canonical Marriage Cases: History, Legislation and Praxis. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2011) [107 2012/1]

Canon 1695

DPM 9 (2002), 139-153: Z. Grocholewski: Der Dienst der Liebe in der kirchlichen Gerichtsbarkeit. (Lecture) [92 2004/2]

FCan VI/2 (2011), 49-51: Elisa Araújo: Reconciliação Conjugal (Parte I): comentário aos cc. 1676 e 1695 CIC. (Commentary) [109 2013/1]

FCan VII/1 (2012), 79-81: Elisa Araújo: Reconciliação Conjugal (Parte II): comentários aos cc. 1676 e 1695 CIC. (Commentary) [110 2013/2]

Canon 1697

IC XLVI 91/06, 99-137: Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña: La introducción de la causa y la cesación de la instancia en la Instrucción Dignitas Connubii. (Conference presentation) [97 2007/1]

Canons 1697-1706

AA VIII (2001), 57-74: C. I. Heredia: Importancia canónica de la primera cópula conyugal. (Article) [89 2003/1]

AA XX (2014), 333-346: Alejandro W. Bunge: Proceso sobre rato y no consumado: fase inicial diocesana. (Article) [116 2016/2]

ADC 1 (abril 2012), 97-110: María Elena Olmos Ortega: Novedades significativas en la ordenación de la Curia Romana del motu proprio Quaerit semper. (Document and comment) [110 2013/2]

AnCrac 44 (2012), 307-319: Andrzej Wójcik: Konsekwencje prawne dopełnienia i niedopełnienia małżeństwa w prawie kanonicznym (Legal consequences of consummation and non-consummation of marriage in canon law). (Article) [112 2014/2]

Ap LXXXIV 2 (2011), 564-580: Matteo Nacci: Le novità del motu proprio Quaerit semper e gli insegnamenti della storia sulla missione della Rota Romana. (Article) [110 2013/2]

Ap LXXXV (2012), 587-602: Grzegorz Erlebach: Nuove competenze della Rota Romana in seguito al motu proprio "Quaerit semper". (Commentary) [113 2015/1]

BEF LXXX 842/04, 390-398: J. González: Divorce and Church Annulment: Any Difference? (Consultation) [94 2005/2]

CLSN 159/09, 44-46: Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments: On instructing a case for the dispensation of a marriage super rato et non consummato. (Document) [106 2011/2]

Comm 43 (2011), 369-371: Antoni Stankiewicz: Articulus explanans Motum Proprium Quaerit semper a Summo Pontifice die 30 mensis augusti 2011 datum, ab Exc.mo D. Antonio Stankiewicz, Decano Rotae Romanae Tribunalis, conscriptus. (Article) [109 2013/1]

EE 86 (2011), 815-822: Carmen Peña García: Nuevas competencias de la Rota Romana en los procedimientos de disolución del matrimonio rato y no consumado y en las causas de nulidad de ordenación: el Motu Proprio Quaerit Semper de Benedicto XVI. (Document and commentary) [108 2012/2]

EE 92 (2017), 567-602: Carmen García Peña: Los «casos difíciles» en la disolución canónica del matrimonio no consumado: aspectos sustantivos y procesales. (Article) [120 2018/2]

FCan V/1 (2010), 81-114, 145-151: Mário Rui de Oliveira: A Carta Circular do Supremo Tribunal da Assinatura Apostólica e o art. 16 da Concordata. (Article) [105 2011/1]

FCan VI/2 (2011), 55-57: Bento XVI: «Quaerit Semper»: Carta Apostólica sob forma de Motu Proprio do Sumo Pontífice. (Document) [109 2013/1]

FCan VI/2 (2011), 59-61: Antoni Stankiewicz: Uma inovação histórica (comentário da Santa Sé à Carta Apostólica em forma de Motu proprio «Quaerit Semper»). (Commentary) [109 2013/1]

FCan XIII/1 (2018), 23-39: Manuel de Pinho Ferreira: Dispensa do matrimónio e não consumado. (Article) [123 2020/1]

FCan XVIII/1 (2023), 151-158: Sagrada Congregação do Concílio: Parisien., 28 de março de 1857. (Decision and comment) [132 2024/2]

N XLVIII 7-8/11, 321-326; also Comm 43 (2011), 289-294: Acta Benedicti PP. XVI: Litterae Apostolicae Motu Proprio datae Quaerit semper. (Document) [109 2013/1]

REDC 69 (2012), 115-148: Rafael Rodríguez Chacón: Quaerit Semper. Una interesante posibilidad de cambio de óptica desde la reorganización de las competencias. (Article) [109 2013/1]

SCL VII (2011), 17-19: Pope Benedict XVI: Apostolic Letter in the Form of 'Motu Proprio' Quaerit Semper. (Document) [108 2012/2]

Elias Frank: The Dissolution of Marriage Bond in the Discipline of the Church and Its Application. (Book) (Urbaniana University Press, Rome, 2017) [118 2017/2]

Luigi Sabbarese – Elias Frank: Scioglimento in favorem fidei del matrimonio non sacramentale. Norme e procedura. (Book) (Urbaniana University Press, Vatican City, 2010) [109 2013/1]

Canons 1697-1712

IE XXIV 2/12, 457-481: Benedetto XVI: Motu proprio Quaerit semper, 30 agosto 2011 (con nota di J. Llobell, La competenza e la procedura per la dispensa "super quolibet matrimonio non consummato" nel m.p. "Quaerit semper"). (Documents and comment) [110 2013/2]

Canon 1698

PS LVIII 175 (2023), 55-83: Danilo R. Flores: The Exercise of the Potestas Vicaria of the Roman Pontiff: Perfect and Harmonious Interaction of Fides, Ratio atque Ius. (Article) [131 2024/1]

RR 2004, 47-72: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: Norms on the Preparation of the Process for the Dissolution of the Marriage Bond in Favor of the Faith. (Documents) [94 2005/2]

Canon 1700

IC 63/126 (2023), 621-662: Carmen Peña: La mujer en la Iglesia Católica: situación canónica actual y perspectivas abiertas por la sinodalidad. (Article) [132 2024/2]

Canon 1704

REDC 73 (2016), 181-206: Julio García Martín: Alcune considerazioni sui concetti «istruttore» e «uditore» e sull’espressione «giudice istruttore». (Article) [117 2017/1]

Canon 1707

AnCrac 54 (2022), 229-253: Mateusz Sajkowski: Źródła i rozwój instytucji domniemanej śmierci współmałżonka w prawie kanonicznym do XV wieku (The sources and development of the institution of the presumed death of a spouse in canon law until the 15th century). (Article) [133 2025/1]

BEF LXXVI 819/00, 512-514: J. González: Presumed Death of Spouse. (Consultation) [86 2001/2]

IC XL 80/00, 451-471: Hernán Corral Talciani: La declaración de muerte presunta en el derecho matrimonial canónico. (Article) [86 2001/2]

SC 32 (1998), 229-230: Gaspé (Québec), Canada, 1983, mort présumée, décret (instruction par mode administratif). (Jurisprudence) [81 1999/1]

SC 32 (1998), 230-234: Vancouver (British Columbia), Canada, 2 February 1993, presumed death, decree (instruction done judicially). (Jurisprudence) [81 1999/1]

SC 32 (1998), 234-238: Peoria (Illinois), United States, 5 August 1997, presumed death, decree (instruction done judicially). (Jurisprudence) [81 1999/1]

Canons 1708-1712

ADC 1 (abril 2012), 97-110: María Elena Olmos Ortega: Novedades significativas en la ordenación de la Curia Romana del motu proprio Quaerit semper. (Document and comment) [110 2013/2]

Ap LXXXIV 2 (2011), 564-580: Matteo Nacci: Le novità del motu proprio Quaerit semper e gli insegnamenti della storia sulla missione della Rota Romana. (Article) [110 2013/2]

Ap LXXXV (2012), 587-602: Grzegorz Erlebach: Nuove competenze della Rota Romana in seguito al motu proprio "Quaerit semper". (Commentary) [113 2015/1]

Comm 34 (2002), 46-56: Congregatio de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum: Decretum quo Regulae Servandae ad nullitatem sacrae Ordinationis declarandam foras dantur. (Document) [103 2010/1]

DPM 11 (2004), 23-43: Rüdiger Althaus: Die Feststellung der Nichtigkeit der Erteilung einer hl. Weihe vor dem Hintergrund der Neuordnung des Verwaltungsverfahrens vom 16. Oktober 2001. (Article) [102 2009/2]

FCan VI/2 (2011), 55-57: Bento XVI: «Quaerit Semper»: Carta Apostólica sob forma de Motu Proprio do Sumo Pontífice. (Document) [109 2013/1]

FCan VI/2 (2011), 59-61: Antoni Stankiewicz: Uma inovação histórica (comentário da Santa Sé à Carta Apostólica em forma de Motu proprio «Quaerit Semper»). (Commentary) [109 2013/1]

IE XV 1/03, 306-313: Congregazione del Culto Divino e della Disciplina dei Sacramenti: De regulis servandis ad nullitatem ordinationis declarandam, 16 ottobre 2001. (Document) [92 2004/2]

IE XV 1/03, 313-331: L. Navarro: Le nuove regulae servandae per le cause di nullità della sacra ordinazione. (Commentary) [92 2004/2]

N XLVIII 7-8/11, 321-326; also Comm 43 (2011), 289-294: Acta Benedicti PP. XVI: Litterae Apostolicae Motu Proprio datae Quaerit semper. (Document) [109 2013/1]

REDC 69 (2012), 115-148: Rafael Rodríguez Chacón: Quaerit Semper. Una interesante posibilidad de cambio de óptica desde la reorganización de las competencias. (Article) [109 2013/1]

REDC 70 (2013), 603-623: José San José Prisco: El proceso de nulidad de la Ordenación. (Conference presentation) [112 2014/2]

Canon 1709

Ap LXXVII 1-2 (2004), 19-28: Congregatio de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum: Decretum quo Regulae Servandae ad nullitatem sacrae Ordinationis declarandam foras dantur. (Document) [97 2007/1]

Canon 1710

SC 52 (2018), 407-441: William L. Daniel: The Universality of the Ordo Iudiciarius of the Church. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Canon 1712

Ap LXVIII 3-4 (1995), 567-586: V. Ferrara: Le conseguenze della sentenza di dichiarazione di nullità della sacra ordinazione dei chierici nel canone 1712. (Article) [81 1999/1]

Canon 1713

SC 30 1/96, 163-176; V. Vondenberger: Effective Due Process Is Possible in the Church. (Article) [77 1997/1]

Canons 1713-1714

Proc CLSA 1996, 210-218: G. Ingels: Advocacy: Emerging Issues. (Seminar Paper) [80 1998/2]

Canons 1713-1715

IC 64/127 (2024), 295-348: Supremo Tribunal de la Signatura Apostólica. Decreto sobre la expulsión de una religiosa, de 22 de junio de 2006; Sentencia sobre la expulsión de una religiosa, de 26 de enero de 2008; Gerardo Núñez: Signatura Apostólica y expulsión de una religiosa: derecho de defensa y fin del litigio por conciliación entre las partes. (Documents and comment). (Article) [133 2025/1]

Ius Comm V (2017), 141-156: Romanae Rotae Tribunal: Decreto coram McKay, 25 febrero 2013. Derechos y reparación de daños. Cuestión incidental: excepción de “pleito acabado”; Santiago Panizo Orallo: Comentario al Decreto coram McKay, 25 febrero 2013. (Decree and comment) [119 2018/1]

SC 47 (2013), 145-181: Daniel Roseman: Mediation in the Church: A Review of the Literature and of the Key Elements of Mediation. (Article) [111 2014/1]

Canons 1713-1716

Ap LXXXIV 1 (2011), 311-333: Matteo Nacci: Decidere per ragioni: l'Arbitratio. Profili storico-giuridici. (Article) [110 2013/2]

CLSN 182/15, 73-95: Frank Morrisey: Dealing Justly With Complaints Against Church Personnel. (Article) [116 2016/2]

DPM 9 (2002), 139-153: Z. Grocholewski: Der Dienst der Liebe in der kirchlichen Gerichtsbarkeit. (Lecture) [92 2004/2]

Proc CLSA 1996, 148-175: C. Cox – H. Skillin: Advocacy: the Western Region's Experience. (Seminar Paper) [80 1998/2]

SC 47 (2013), 341-360: Anne Asselin: Les ministres ecclésiaux laïcs et la révocation de leur office: en quête de justice et d'équité. (Conference presentation) [112 2014/2]

Clara Trinidad Velasco Blanco: El Servicio de Mediación, Arbitraje y Conciliación canónico. (Doctoral thesis) (Laborum – Universidad Católica de Valencia, Colecciones Tesis Doctorales n° 2, 2021) [129 2023/1]

Canons 1713-1717

AC 46 (2004), 103-124: J.-P. Schouppe: Les procedures administratives face aux dysfonctionnements dans les communautés ecclésiales. (Article) [95 2006/1]

Canon 1714

AA XIX (2013), 153-177: Helmuth Pree: El empleo de instrumentos jurídico-civiles en la administración eclesiástica. Posibilidades y límites. (Article) [113 2015/1]

Canon 1717

AC 43 (2001), 285-300: O. Échappé: Le secret en question. (Article) [91 2004/1]

AC 44 (2002), 251-259: O. Échappé: L'affaire de l'officialité de Lyon. (Article) [91 2004/1]

ADC 12 (julio 2023), 267-294: Antonio Rella Ríos: El VELM: Remedios procedimentales para atender los casos de denuncias de conductas de abuso sexual. (Article) [132 2024/2]

ADC 13 (diciembre 2023), 77-108: Oscar Giovanni Gracias Ramos: El derecho de la defensa en la práctica canónica penal. (Article) [133 2025/1]

AnC 17 (2021) 2, 49-81: Piotr Majer: Przełożony kościelny a notitia criminis w sprawie zastrzeżonego dla Kongregacji Nauki Wiary przestępstwa przeciwko VI przykazaniu Dekalogu (Church superior and “notitia criminis” in the case of a crime against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith). (Article) [128 2022/2]

AnC 18 (2022) 1, 5-48: Dariusz Borek: Obowiązek powiadomienia o przestępstwie w prawie i praktyce Kościoła (The obligation of making a delict denunciation in the law and practice of the Church). (Article) [129 2023/1]

Ap LXXIX 3-4 (2006), 765-800: Michele Riondino: Profili comparatistici della mediazione familiare in Europa. (Article) [101 2009/1]

Ap XCIII (2020),, 319-383: Francesca Lando: La necessità di attività previe al processo canonico come ricostruzione della verità dei fatti in un contesto dialogico educativo. (Article) [133 2025/1]

Canonist 14/2 (2023), 243-259: Brendan Daly: The Extrajudicial Penal Process. (Article) [132 2024/2]

EIC 61 (2021), 475-502: Damián Astigueta: Trasparenza e tutela del segreto processuale e della buona fama. (Article) [128 2022/2]

ITQ LXVIII 3/03, 291-293: Michael Mullaney: Graviora delicta: The Duty to Report Clerical Sexual Abuse to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (Article) [92 2004/2]

J 78 (2022), 445-476: Michael J. Mazza: Bona Fama in an Age of “Transparency”: Publishing Lists of “Credibly Accused” Clerics. (Article) [130 2023/2]

J 79 (2023), 285-323: Michael J. Mazza: Moral Certainty in Uncertain Times: The Importance of Standards of Proof When Responding to Accusations of Clerical Misconduct. (Article) [132 2024/2]

LJ 145/00, 21-28: G. Evans: The New Clergy Discipline Measure of the Church of England. (Article) [87 2002/1]

Per 98 (2009), 195-233: Damián G. Astigueta: L'investigazione previa: alcune problematiche. (Article) [103 2010/1]

Per 103 (2014), 629-662: G. Paolo Montini: Il soggetto che conduce l'indagine previa e il giudice del collegio nel processo penale: la valenza del can. 1717 §3, seconda parte. (Article) [115 2016/1]

Per 107 (2018), 513-522: Davide Cito: Trasparenza e segreto nel diritto penale canonico. (Presentation) [122 2019/2]

Per 108 (2019), 471-516; Francisco José Campos Martínez: Presunción de inocencia e investigación previa canónica. Pautas para un procedimiento justo en denuncias por abuso sexual. (Article) [125 2021/1]

PS XLVI 136 (2011), 63-84: Mayong Andreas Acin – Isaias Tiongco: The Nature of Delict in Canon 1321: Its Implications on the Dismissal Process of Religious in Cases of Sexual Misconduct. Part II. (Article) [107 2012/1]

QDE 25 (2012), 281-315: Marino Mosconi: I principali doveri del vescovo davanti alla notizia di un delitto "più grave" commesso contra la morale o nella celebrazione dei sacramenti. (Article) [110 2013/2]

QDE 25 (2012), 316-355: Desiderio Vajani: La procedura canonica a livello diocesano nel caso dei delicta graviora. (Article and formulary) [110 2013/2]

QDE 36 (2023), 104-128: Luigi Sabbarese: Responsibilità e competenze dei superiori maggiori degli istituti di vita consacrata e società di vita apostolica nella tutela dei minori e nel perseguimento degli abusi sessuali commessi da chierici e/o religiosi. (Article) [131 2024/1]

QDE 36 (2023), 347-384: Gianluca Marchetti: La segnalazione di comportamenti illeciti e la notitia criminis. (Article) [132 2024/2]

RR 2003, 48-51: W. H. Woestman: Secrecy Concerning Delicts. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

RR 2004, 122-124: P. L. Golden – F. J. Morrisey: Necessity of Priest-Notary During Preliminary Investigation. (Advisory Opinions) [94 2005/2]

RR 2004, 167-170: P. L. Golden – P. R. Lagges: Appointment of Canonical Counsel. (Advisory Opinions) [94 2005/2]

RR 2004, 188-191: A. J. Espelage: Rules for the Investigation of a Crime. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

S 70 (2008), 711-726: David Albornoz: Norme e orientamenti della Chiesa cattolica dinanzi agli abusi sessuali di minori perpetrati da chierici. (Article) [102 2009/2]

Canons 1717-1718

AnC 3 (2007), 199-216: Tomasz Rakoczy: Przesłanki perymptoryjne do rozpoczęcia kanonicznego procesu karnego (Conditions preventing the start of canonical legal proceedings). (Article) [105 2011/1]

Canonist 6/1 (2015), 11-43: John Renken: Penal Law in the Church Tomorrow: Reflections on a Revision of Book VI. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Canonist 9/1 (2018), 88-111: Patrick J. Mullins: Comparing the Roles of the Promoter of Justice in the Judicial Penal Trial and of the Queensland Director of Public Prosecutions. (Article) [121 2019/1]

Ius Comm XI (2023), 115-138: Yeshica Marianne Umaña Calderón: La participación de la víctima de abuso sexual clerical en el proceso canónico. (Article) [131 2024/1]

QDE 18 (2005), 181-193: Marino Mosconi: L'azione del vescovo a tutela del celibato dei chierici: il ricorso al precetto penale. (Article) [95 2006/1]

QDE 24 (2011), 233-251: Egidio Miragoli: La perdita dello stato clericale e la dispensa dal celibato. (Article) [108 2012/2]

RDC 57 2/07, 409-433: Anne Bamberg: L'évêque face à la sainteté des sacraments: loi et procédure concernant les délits les plus graves. (Article) [105 2011/1]

REDC 70 (2013), 513-545: Myriam Cortés Diéguez: La investigación previa y el proceso administrativo penal. (Conference presentation) [112 2014/2]

SC 57 (2023), 665-682: Yeshica Marianne Umaña Calderón: The Participation of the Victim of Sexual Abuse in Canonical Penal Proceedings. (Article) [132 2024/2]

Canons 1717-1719

Ap LXXXVI (2013), 19-57: Elena Di Bernardo: Modelli processuali e finalità perseguite nell'Istruttoria civile e canonica. Rilievi comparativi. (Article) [113 2015/1]

Canonist 13/2 (2022), 217-227: Giorgio Giovanelli: The Investigatio Praevia and the Role of the Ordinary for Criminal Procedures. (Article) [131 2024/1]

CLSN 182/15, 73-95: Frank Morrisey: Dealing Justly With Complaints Against Church Personnel. (Article) [116 2016/2]

FThC IV (2016) Suppl., 41-48: Péter Artner: Preventive Disciplinary Measures Before the Application of a Penalty. (Article) [118 2017/2]

IE XVIII 2/06, 524-527: Arcivescovo Moderatore del Tribunale Ecclesiastico Regionale: Decreto di ammonizione di un avvocato, 29 giugno 2006. (Document) [98 2007/2]

IE XXXVI (2024), 127-166: Francesco Salvatore Rea: Investigatio prævia e diritto di difesa dell’indagato attraverso il filtro del giusto processo penale. Criticità di sistema e analisi de iure condito. (Article) [133 2025/1]

PS XXXVI 106/01, 5-40: A. Mendonça: Justice and Equity in Decisions Involving Priests. (Article) [87 2002/1]

SC 54 (2020), 181-219: Valère Nkouaya Mbandji: L’enquête préliminaire dans la procédure pénale canonique. (Article) [125 2021/1]

VJTR 80 7/16, 524-537: Sebastian S. Karambai: Delict of Sexual Abuse by Clerics: The Complaint and Preliminary Investigation. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Patricia M. Dugan (ed.): Towards Future Developments in Penal Law: U.S. Theory and Practice. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2010) [104 2010/2]

Canons 1717-1720

ADC 9 (abril 2020), 15-66: Serafín Martínez Fernández: Problemas del proceso extrajudicial. La relación de justicia. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Canonist 12/1 (2021), 55-66: Brendan Daly: Put It in Writing. (Article) [127 2022/1]

IC 57/113 (2017), 323-385: Jorge Miras: Guía para el procedimiento administrativo canónico en materia penal. (Document) [119 2018/1]

IusM XIII/2019, 203-214: Claudio Papale: Aspetti procedurali e prassi della Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede. (Article) [124 2020/2]

REDC 74 (2017), 217-236: Raúl Ramón Sánchez: La investigación previa al proceso penal canónico y la defensa del acusado. (Article) [119 2018/1]

SC 55 (2021), 553-599: John Anthony Renken: Vademecum on Certain Points of Procedure in Treating Cases of Sexual Abuse of Minors Committed by Clerics: Canonical Reflections. (Article) [128 2022/2]

SC 57 (2023), 171-228: Joaquín Llobell†: Due Process and the “Administrativization” of the Canonical Penal Procedure. (Article) [131 2024/1]

Canons 1717-1722

SC 38 (2004), 369-410: Patrick Lagges: The Penal Process: The Preliminary Investigation in Light of the Essential Norms of the United States. (Article) [95 2006/1]

Canons 1717-1728

AA XVII (2011), 101-118: Ricardo Daniel Medina: Algunas consideraciones acerca de los procesos administrativos. (Article) [109 2013/1]

AA XVII (2011), 119-146: José M. Serrano Ruiz: Cuestiones actuales del derecho procesal canónico. (Article) [109 2013/1]

ADC 3 (abril 2014), 31-51: Manuel J. Arroba Conde: Justicia reparativa y derecho penal canónico. Aspectos procesales. (Article) [113 2015/1]

ADC 10 (abril 2021), 15-91: Antonio Rella Ríos: El abuso sexual en la Iglesia. Conceptualización y tratamiento canónico. (Article) [127 2022/1]

Ap LXXIII (2000), 367-405: Z. Suchecki: Il processo penale giudiziario nel Codex Iuris Canonici del 1983. (Article) [90 2003/2]

CLSN 137/04, 45-64: G. Ingels: Safeguarding Rights when Investigating Allegations of Misconduct of Clergy and Religious. (Paper) [94 2005/2]

CLSN 137/04, 65-68: G. Read: The Safeguarding of Rights when Investigating Allegations of Misconduct by Clergy and Religious. (Comment) [94 2005/2]

IC 60/119 (2020), 61-88: Davide Cito: El derecho de defensa en los procesos sobre delitos de abuso de menores. (Article) [125 2021/1]

IE VIII 1/96, 390-424: National Conference of Catholic Bishops (United States): Canonical Delicts Involving Sexual Misconduct and Dismissal from the Clerical State, 25 April 1994. (Instruction) [78 1997/2]

J 71 (2011), 120-158: Thomas J. Green: Sacramentorum Sanctitatis Tutela: Reflections on the Revised May 2010 Norms on More Serious Delicts. (Article) [109 2013/1]

J 75 (2015), 109-195: R. Lucien Millette: An Analysis of the Preliminary Investigation in Light of the Rights of the Accused. (Article) [115 2016/1]

Per 107 (2018), 523-535: Damián G. Astigueta: Trasparenza e segreto. Aspetti della prassi penalistica. (Presentation) [122 2019/2]

Per 108 (2019), 671-705: Damián G. Astigueta: Sentenza, certezza e motivazione nel processo penale. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Per 112 (2023), 299-317: Paolo Bianchi: Dalla indagine previa al processo penale: che cosa acquisire? (Consultation) [132 2024/2]

SCL V (2009), 45-68: Congregation for the Clergy: Circular Letter on Special Faculties and Procedure for Laicizing Some Priests. (Document and commentaries) [105 2011/1]

SCL V (2009), 69-78: Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples: Special Faculties to the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples. (Document) [105 2011/1]

SCL V (2009), 277-296: John A. Renken: The 2009 Special Faculties Conceded by Pope Benedict XVI to Address Serious Clergy Issues: A Brief Commentary. (Commentary) [105 2011/1]

Canons 1717-1731

AC 61 (2020-2021), 47-59: Benoît Malvaux: La praxis du traitement des delicta graviora dans les instituts de vie consacrée. (Article) [129 2023/1]

AkK 170 (2001), 441-462: Heribert Schmitz: Der Kongregation fur die Glaubenslehre vorbehaltene Straftaten. (Article) [91 2004/1]

Ap LXIX 1-2 (1996), 79-117: G. di Mattia: La procedura penale giudiziaria e amministrativa nel CCEO e CJC: reflessioni comparative. (Article) [81 1999/1]

BEF LXXIX 836/03, 347-371: Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines Commission on Clergy: Pastoral Care of Victims and Offenders: Handling Cases of Sexual Abuse and Misconduct by the Clergy. (Report and Pastoral Guide) [91 2004/1]

BV 80 (2020), 595-608: Stanislav Slatinek: lzbira upravnega kazenskega postopka za vzpostavitev pravičnosti v Cerkvi: dileme in kritične ugotovitve (Choice of administrative penal procedure to restore justice in the Church: dilemmas and critical findings). (Article) [126 2021/2]

Canonist 8/1 (2017), 94-109: Brendan Daly: Removal of the Faculties of a Priest by a Diocesan Bishop. (Article) [119 2018/1]

Canonist 11/2 (2020), 197-217: Brendan Daly: An Analysis of the Vademecum of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Canonist 14/2 (2023), 222-242: Fabio Freda: The Canonical Penal Judicial Process. (Article) [132 2024/2]

CLSN 197/20, 35-59: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: Vademecum: On Certain Points of Procedure in Treating Cases of Sexual Abuse of Minors Committed by Clerics. (Document) [126 2021/2]

CLSN 202/22, 51-77: George Woodall: Penal law, penal procedures and procedures relating to penal law. (Article) [131 2024/1]

Comm 40 (2008), 348-376: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Processibus" (Sessio XII). (Report) [106 2011/2]

Comm 42 (2010), 58-61: Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei: Directorium quoad abusos sexuales in minores patratos (lingua anglica una cum versione italica). (Document) [106 2011/2]

Comm 48 (2016), 139-215: ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum “De Iure Poenali” (Sessio IX). (Documentation) [118 2017/2]

Comm 52 (2020), 393-421: Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei: Vademecum “su alcuni punti di procedura nel trattamento dei casi di abuso sessuale di minori commessi da chierici”, 16 iulii 2020. (Document) [126 2021/2]

EE LXXVII, 303/02, 631-660: J. L. Sánchez-Girón Renedo: La crisis en la Iglesia de Estados Unidos: normas propuestas por la conferencia episcopal. (Article) [91 2004/1]

EE 97 (2022), 1217-1250: Carlos M. Morán Bustos: Los abusos de menores en la Iglesia y la necesidad ineludible de un nuevo derecho procesal penal canónico. (Article) [130 2023/2]

For XIII/02-XIV/03, 116-125: C. Scicluna: The Procedure and Praxis of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith regarding Graviora Delicta. (Article) [95 2006/1]

IC 53/106 (2013), 573-620: Gerardo Núñez: Procesos penales especiales. Los delicta graviora. (Article) [112 2014/2]

IE XII 3/00, 787-802: P. Erdö: Il processo canonico penale amministrativo. Mezzi possibili dell'efficacia del sistema penale canonico (questioni fondamentali e preliminari). (Lecture) [87 2002/1]

Ius II 2/2011, 385-388: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: changes made to "Sacramentorum Sanctitatis Tutela". (Documentation) [108 2012/2]

J 65 (2005), 119-145: R. J. Kaslyn: Three Legal Texts and their Interconnection: An Overview. (Article) [96 2006/2]

ME CXXVI 1/02, 1-7 [sic: in reality 101-107]: P. Lopez-Gallo: The Rights of Offender Priests. (Article) [91 2004/1]

Per 109 (2020), 401-428, 659-674: Myriam Wijlens – Neville Owen: Promoting and protecting the dignity of persons in allegations of abuse of minors and vulnerable adults: balancing confidentiality, transparency, and accountability: a seminar organized by the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. Introduction / Concluding observations. (Presentation) [128 2022/2]

Per 109 (2020), 493-503: Charles J. Scicluna: The Rights of Victims in Canonical Penal Processes. (Presentation) [128 2022/2]

Proc CLSA 2005, 95-122: Ronny E. Jenkins: Jurisprudence in Penal Cases: Select Themes from the Judicial Doctrine of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota. (Seminar paper) [101 2009/1]

Proc CLSA 2009, 131-149: James I. Donlon: Promoting Justice in the Church. (Lecture) [109 2013/1]

Proc CLSA 2009, 232-242: Amy Jill Strickland: To Protect and to Serve: The Relationship between the Victim Assistance Coordinator and Canonical Personnel. (Lecture) [109 2013/1]

SC 51 (2017), 55-87: Brian T. Austin: Due Process of Law and the USCCB Essential Norms. (Article) [119 2018/1]

Patricia M. Dugan (ed.): The Penal Process and the Protection of Rights in Canon Law. (Book) (Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2005) [95 2006/1]

Patricia M. Dugan (ed.): Advocacy Vademecum. (Book) (Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2006) [97 2007/1]

Charles J. Scicluna – Myriam Wijlens (eds.): Rights of Alleged Victims in Penal Proceedings. Provisions in Canon Law and the Criminal Law of Different Legal Systems. (eBook) (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2023) [130 2023/2]

Canons 1717-1739

Proc CLSA 1996, 210-218: G. Ingels: Advocacy: Emerging Issues. (Seminar Paper) [80 1998/2]

Canon 1718

AC 56 (2014-2015), 9-17: Bruno Gonçalvès: L’intelligence procédurale au service de l’efficience canonique. (Discourse) [118 2017/2]

Per 101 (2012), 633-668: Andrea D'Auria: La scelta della procedura per l'irrogazione delle pene. (Article) [112 2014/2]

Canon 1720

AA XVII (2011), 77-99: Ariel David Busso: Consideraciones acerca de la defensa de los derechos. (Article) [109 2013/1]

Canonist 14/2 (2023), 243-259: Brendan Daly: The Extrajudicial Penal Process. (Article) [132 2024/2]

CLSN 112/97, 18-25: G. Read: Procedures in Doctrinal Cases. (Article) [81 1999/1]

CLSN 164/10, 5-34: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: Revised Norms for the Processing of Graviora Delicta. (Documents and commentary) [106 2011/2]

CLSN 166/11, 5-16: Juan Ignacio Arrieta: Proposed Reforms in Penal Procedures and the Contribution of Cardinal Ratzinger. (Article, with comment by Gordon Read) [108 2012/2]

IC 51/101 (2011), 69-101: Davide Cito: La pérdida del estado clerical ex officio ante las actuales urgencias pastorales. (Lecture) [107 2012/1]

IC 58/115 (2018), 121-148: Miquel Pons Portella: Los supuestos de aplicación extrajudicial de penas en el Derecho Canónico. (Article) [121 2019/1]

IC 61/121 (2021), 65-98: William L. Daniel: La normalización del proceso penal extrajudicial (c. 1720). Análisis, crítica, propuestas. (Article) [127 2022/1]

IE XXXII (2020), 183-209: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica: 11 giugno 1993, Prot. N. 22785/91 CA N. Rimozione dall’ufficio (Rev.do X – Congregazione per il Clero), con un commento di Javier Canosa, L’articolazione dinamica della distinzione fra diritto penale e diritto amministrativo nella Chiesa. (Sentence and comment) [125 2021/1]

J 66 (2006), 469-482: Ruud G. W. Huysmans: The Inquisition for which the Pope did not Ask Forgiveness. (Article) [98 2007/2]

PCF IX (2007), 51-92: Raul T. Go: Administrative Tribunals in the Particular Church. (Article) [100 2008/2]

QDE 25 (2012), 316-355: Desiderio Vajani: La procedura canonica a livello diocesano nel caso dei delicta graviora. (Article and formulary) [110 2013/2]

RDC 57 2/07, 409-433: Anne Bamberg: L'évêque face à la sainteté des sacraments: loi et procédure concernant les délits les plus graves. (Article) [105 2011/1]

REDC 75 (2018), 199-233: Miquel Pons Portella: El procedimiento administrativo penal en el Derecho canónico del siglo XXI. (Article) [121 2019/1]

RMDC 27/2 (2021), 315-335: Rogelio Ayala Partida: El derecho de defensa en el proceso administrativo penal. La participación del abogado. (Article) [129 2023/1]

SC 48 (2014), 301-329: Kevin Gillespie: The Special Faculties Granted to the Congregation for the Clergy: For the Salvation of Souls and the Good Order of the Ecclesiastical Community: Context, Purpose, and Use. (Article) [114 2015/2]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1720-1721

AC 57 (2016), 277-283: Philippe Toxé: Recours contentieux administratif et Droit pénal. (Article) [120 2018/2]

Canons 1720-1728

ADC 3 (abril 2014), 73-148: Carlos López Segovia: El derecho a la defensa en el proceso penal administrativo. (Article) [113 2015/1]

SC 33 (1999), 169-212: G. Ingels: Dismissal from the Clerical State: An Examination of the Penal Process. (Article) [83 2000/1]

SC 33 (1999), 213-228: Somewhere in North America, 20 May 1998, definitive sentence in first instance, penal case. (Jurisprudence) [83 2000/1]

SC 53 (2019), 561-601: Valère Nkouaya Mbandji: L’instruction d’une cause pénale. (Article) [124 2020/2]

Canon 1721

QDE 35 (2022), 357-377: Gianpaolo Montini: La struttura del processo penale giudiziale canonico. (Article) [130 2023/2]

Canons 1721-1728

REDC 70 (2013), 547-564: Luis A. García Matamoro: El proceso judicial penal cc. 1721-1728 CIC 83. (Conference presentation) [112 2014/2]

Canon 1722

Canonist 14/2 (2023), 243-259: Brendan Daly: The Extrajudicial Penal Process. (Article) [132 2024/2]

CLSN 164/10, 5-34: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: Revised Norms for the Processing of Graviora Delicta. (Documents and commentary) [106 2011/2]

CLSN 182/15, 73-95: Frank Morrisey: Dealing Justly With Complaints Against Church Personnel. (Article) [116 2016/2]

Comm 42 (2010), 346-348: Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei: Synthesis mutationum introductarum in M. P. Normae de gravioribus delictis reservatis Congregationi pro Doctrina Fidei. (Document) [107 2012/1]

For VII 2/96, 373-377: Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura: Re: the Exercise of Priestly Ministry. Decree of the Congresso. (Decree) [79 1998/1]

IE IX 2/97, 815-817: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica: Decreto particolare "Exercitii ministerii sacerdotalis", 25 marzo 1996 (con nota di D. Cito). (Decree and commentary) [82 1999/2]

Ius 12, No. 1 (2021), 21-42: Sebastian Payyappilly: Preliminary Investigation and the Application of CCEO c. 1473 (CIC c. 1722): A Reflection in the Light of Vademecum (2020). (Article) [128 2022/2]

Per 109 (2020), 273-312: Ulrich Rhode: La sospensione imposta di carattere non penale. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Per 109 (2020), 313-364: G. Paolo Montini: Il principio di proporzionalità nei provvedimenti di sospensione dall’esercizio del ministero sacerdotale secondo la giurisprudenza della Segnatura Apostolica. (Presentation) [125 2021/1]

QDE 12 (1999), 191-204: P. Montini: Provvedimenti cautelari urgenti nel caso di accuse odiose nei confronti di ministri sacri. (Article) [83 2000/1]

QDE 35 (2022), 468-484: Matteo Visioli: I provvedimenti cautelari: annotazioni pratiche. (Article) [130 2023/2]

QDE 35 (2022), 485-499: G. Paolo Montini: I ricorsi avverso le misure cautelari di cui al can. 1722. (Notes) [130 2023/2]

REDC 74 (2017), 369-423: Francisco José Campos Martínez: Derechos fundamentales del investigado y aplicación de medidas cautelares. Un estudio a partir del art. 19 de las «normas sobre los delitos más graves». (Article) [120 2018/2]

RR 2003, 104-107: B. Daly: Administrative Leave of Priest Accused of Sexual Abuse. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

RR 2004, 191-194: P. J. Cogan – F. G. Morrisey: Precept Imposing "Administrative Leave". (Advisory Opinions) [94 2005/2]

RR 2005, 49-53: J. M. Ritty: Balancing Rights of Accused Cleric and the Good of the Community. (Opinion) [96 2006/2]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Mario Medina Balam – Luis de Jesús Hernández Mercado (eds.): La dimisión del estado clerical y su normativa canónica más reciente. (Book) (Universidad Pontificia de México, 2012) [110 2013/2]

Canon 1727

FT 18 (2007), 147-170: Markus Müller: Die Berufung im kanonischen Prozessrecht. (Article) [101 2009/1]

IE XXXIV (2022), 141-177: Gianpaolo Montini: Strumenti di impugnazione delle decisioni penali. (Article) [129 2023/1]

QDE 30 (2017), 68-74: Tiziano Vanzetto: L’appello da parte del promotore di giustizia nelle cause penali (can. 1727 §2). (Comment) [120 2018/2]

Canon 1728

IC 60/120 (2020), 567-607: William L. Daniel: The Litis contestatio in the Canonical Penal Trial. (Article) [126 2021/2]

QDE 27 (2014), 69-89: Marino Mosconi: Nessuno può essere obbligato a riconoscere la propria colpa: il can. 1728 §2. (Article) [113 2015/1]

SC 52 (2018), 407-441: William L. Daniel: The Universality of the Ordo Iudiciarius of the Church. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Canon 1729

IC XLV 90/05, 557-608: Javier Ferrer Ortiz: La responsabilidad civil de la Diócesis por los actos de sus clérigos. (Article) [96 2006/2]

IE XXXV (2023), 449-471: Matteo Carnì: La riparazione del danno da parte del delinquente e l’eventuale responsabilità civile ex delicto dell’ente di appartenenza. (Article) [132 2024/2]

Canons 1729-1731

IE XXV (2013), 79-91, 107-119: Tribunale Apostolico della Rota Romana: Penale e riparazione dei danni, Decreto, 23 gennaio 2008, McKay, Ponente (con nota di Adolfo Zambon, Sul risarcimento del danno. Alcune riflessioni a partire da due coram McKay). (Decree and comment) [111 2014/1]

QDE 35 (2022), 357-377: Gianpaolo Montini: La struttura del processo penale giudiziale canonico. (Article) [130 2023/2]

Canon 1732

CLSN 135/03, 5-29: A. Mendonça: The Bishop as the Mirror of Justice and Equity in the Particular Church: Some Practical Reflections on Episcopal Ministry. (Article) [92 2004/2]

SC 29 (1995), 85-101: M. Thériault: Le beneficium novae audientiae dans la procédure de recours contre les décrets administratifs. (Article) [75 1996/1]

Canons 1732-1734

Ap LXXXV (2012), 7-72: Paolo Gherri: L'Autotutela amministrativa come supplemento di conoscenza: la Remonstratio canonica (Cann. 1732-1734 CIC). (Article) [113 2015/1]

Canons 1732-1739

AC 56 (2014-2015), 229-248: Philippe Toxé: Quel principe de légalité en droit canonique? (Article) [118 2017/2]

AC 57 (2016), 277-283: Philippe Toxé: Recours contentieux administratif et Droit pénal. (Article) [120 2018/2]

ADC 3 (abril 2014), 73-148: Carlos López Segovia: El derecho a la defensa en el proceso penal administrativo. (Article) [113 2015/1]

ADC 6 (abril 2017), 15-48: Francisco J. Zamora-García: Resolución del recurso jerárquico. (Article) [119 2018/1]

Ap LXXV 3-4 (2002), 715-743. J. J. Coughlin: Communio and Administrative Justice. (Article) [91 2004/1]

Ap LXXXI 3-4 (2008), 1035-1042: Paolo Gherri: Compendio di Diritto amministrativo canonico. Note ad una proposta teoretica. (Bibliographical review) [103 2010/1]

EE 97 (2022), 1197-1216: Gianpaolo Montini: Agenda per una evoluzione della giustizia amministrativa canonica. (Article) [130 2023/2]

For VII 2/96, 277-294: Z. Grocholewski: II Processo Contenzioso Amministrativo presso la Segnatura Apostolica. (Article) [79 1998/1]

For VII 2/96, 295-304: J. Punderson: Contentious-Administrative Recourse to the Second Section of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Article) [79 1998/1]

For VII 2/96, 347-357: Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura: Suppression of the parish of St. Michael and reduction of the parish church to profane but not sordid use (Mr. X.Y.Z.–Congregation for Clergy). Definitive Decree before Agustoni 4 May 1996. (Decree) [79 1998/1]

For XVI/05, 87-110: C. Scicluna: Recourse against Singular or Particular Administrative Acts of the Diocesan Bishop: Request for Revocation or Amendment; Hierarchical Recourse to the Holy See; Procedure before the Apostolic Signatura. (Paper) [96 2006/2]

FThC VI (2017), 77-103: Kurt Martens: Hierarchical recourse as a dialogue between particular Church and universal Church? Difficulties, challenges and opportunities. (Conference) [120 2018/2]

IC XLVI 92/06, 557-580: Jorge Miras: El objeto del recurso contencioso-administrativo en el Derecho canónico vigente. (Conference presentation) [98 2007/2]

IE VIII 1/96, 37-69: I. Zuanazzi: Il principio di legalità nella funzione amministrativa canonica. (Article) [78 1997/2]

IE VIII 1/96, 71-96: M. Marchesi: I ricorsi gerarchici presso i dicasteri della Curia Romana. (Article) [78 1997/2]

IE XI 3/99, 683-737: M. A. Ortiz: I ricorsi gerarchici. (Article) [85 2001/1]

IE XIII 2/01, 421-448: G. P. Montini: La trasmissione degli atti da parte del dicastero nel processo amministrativo presso il Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica. (Lecture) [89 2003/1]

IE XVIII 3/06, 551-577: Javier Canosa: I principi e le fasi del procedimento amministrativo nel diritto canonico. (Article) [100 2008/2]

IE XXVII (2015), 114-124: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica: Decreto del Segretario, Di sostentamento, 11 marzo 2013 (con nota di Javier Canosa, Aspetti dello statuto giuridico dei chierici trattati in due decisioni della Segnatura Apostolica). (Document and comment) [115 2016/1]

IE XXVII (2015), 339-356: Paolo Gherri: Petitio, remonstratio, exceptio: cenni esplorativi sui modi di non-esecuzione degli atti amministrativi singolari. (Article) [116 2016/2]

IE XXXIII (2021), 537-568: Gianpaolo Montini: La responsabilità dell’Autorità ecclesiastica secondo la giurisprudenza della Segnatura Apostolica. (Article) [128 2022/2]

IE XXXIV (2022), 141-177: Gianpaolo Montini: Strumenti di impugnazione delle decisioni penali. (Article) [129 2023/1]

ITQ 61 (1995), 250-264: Richard J. Barrett: The Rights of the Faithful: Some Signs of Progress. (Article) [78 1997/2]

Ius Comm VIII (2020), 197-213: Dominique Mamberti: La justicia administrativa canónica: actualidad y perspectivas. (Lecture) [126 2021/2]

J 68 (2008), 178-222: Kurt Martens: The Law That Never Was: The Motu Proprio Administrativae Potestatis on Administrative Procedures. (Article) [105 2011/1]

J 69 (2009), 646-702: Kurt Martens: Protection of Rights: Experiences with Hierarchical Recourse and Possibilities for the Future. (Article) [105 2011/1]

J 73 (2013), 222-227: Apostolic Signatura: Decree of Rejection of a Recourse. (Decree) [111 2014/1]

J 73 (2013), 228-235: Kurt Martens: Brief Note on the Apostolic Signatura and the Contentious-Administrative Recourse. (Article) [111 2014/1]

J 77 (2021), 465-478: Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, Decree of the Secretary, Denial of Revocation of Elections, prot. n. 50325/15 CA, September 4, 2015; Wojciech Kowal: Brief Note on a Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura Rejecting Recourse for Revocation of an Election in an Association of the Faithful. (Decree and comment) [128 2022/2]

Per 102 (2013), 641-677: G. Paolo Montini: La giustizia amministrativa dal Concilio al Codice. (Conference presentation) [113 2015/1]

Per 103 (2014), 27-66: G. Paolo Montini: Conspectus decisionum quae a Supremo Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunali in ambitu contentioso administrativo ab anno 1968 ad annum 2012 latae atque publici iuris factae sunt. (Article) [113 2015/1]

Per 107 (2018), 631-662: Giovanni Parise: Circa alcune questioni afferenti al giudizio contenzioso amministrativo canonico. (Article) [123 2020/1]

Proc CLSA 1996, 148-175: C. Cox – H. Skillin: Advocacy: the Western Region's Experience. (Seminar Paper) [80 1998/2]

Proc CLSA 2000, 19-47: J. R. Punderson: Hierarchical Recourse to the Holy See: Theory and Practice. (Seminar Paper) [88 2002/2]

Proc CLSA 2000, 93-106: J. P. Beal: Hierarchical Recourse: Procedures at the Local Level. (Seminar Paper) [88 2002/2]

Proc CLSA 2001, 37-48: T. T. Brundage: Canonical Issues in Due Process. (Seminar Paper) [89 2003/1]

PS XXXVI 106/01, 5-40: A. Mendonça: Justice and Equity in Decisions Involving Priests. (Article) [87 2002/1]

QDE 8 (1995), 287-320: G. Paolo Montini: Modalità procedurali e processuali per la difesa dei diritti dei fedeli. Il ricorso gerarchico. Il ricorso alla Segnatura Apostolica. (Article) [76 1996/2]

RMDC 16 (2010), 63-112: Pío Vito Pinto: El recurso contencioso administrativo ante la Signatura Apostólica. (Article) [105 2011/1]

RMDC 16 (2010), 7-36: Pío Vito Pinto: Status actual del Derecho Administrativo en la Iglesia: Sus fundamentos teológicos y las diferentes perspectivas actuales. (Article) [105 2011/1]

RMDC 16 (2010), 37-62: Pío Vito Pinto: El recurso jerárquico. (Article) [105 2011/1]

RMDC 18 (2012), 223-276: Marco Antonio Hernández H.: Consideraciones a partir de algunas decisiones de la Signatura Apostólica, adoptadas con posterioridad a la promulgación del Código de Derecho Canónico vigente. (Article) [110 2013/2]

RMDC 20/2 (2014), 259-286: Marco Antonio Hernández H.: El procedimiento del Recurso jerárquico ante los dicasterios de la Curia Romana en la Jurisprudencia del STSA. Primera parte. (Article) [117 2017/1]

RR 2003, 82-86: A. J. Espelage: How to Make Hierarchical Recourse. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

SC 52 (2018), 103-138: Justin E.A. Glyn: The Right to Administrative Justice in Religious Institutes. (Article) [121 2019/1]

SC 54 (2020), 265-290: Aurimas Rudinskas: The Procedure for Administrative Recourse: A Comparative Study of the Latin and Eastern Codes. (Article) [125 2021/1]

Yves-Alain Ducass: Administrative Justice in the Catholic Church. (Book) (Canonists without Borders, Paris, 2018) [121 2019/1]

Canons 1732-1747

QDE 24 (2011), 109-125: G. Paolo Montini: La rimozione del parrocco tra legislazione, prassi e giurisprudenza. (Article) [108 2012/2]

RR 2003, 107-113: T. J. Green: Possible Recourse of Congregation against Removal of Pastor. (Advisory Opinion) [94 2005/2]

Canons 1732-1752

Comm 42 (2010), 69-70: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Parvus Coetus de Processu Administrativo Sessio I die 13 mensis ianuarii 1970 habita. (Report) [106 2011/2]

Comm 42 (2010), 71-77: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Parvus Coetus de Processu Administrativo Sessio II diebus 22-24 mensis octobris 1970 habita. (Report) [106 2011/2]

Comm 42 (2010), 78-80: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Parvus Coetus de Processu Administrativo Sessio III diebus 2-6 mensis martii 1971 habita. (Report) [106 2011/2]

Comm 42 (2010), 80-123: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Specialis Commissio Pontificia Coetus de Procedura Administrativa Sessio I diebus 1-5 mensis iulii 1971 habita. (Report) [106 2011/2]

Comm 42 (2010), 124-142: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Specialis Commissio Pontificia Coetus de Procedura Administrativa Sessio II diebus 4-6 mensis novembris 1971 habita. (Report) [106 2011/2]

Comm 42 (2010), 381-388: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Quintum canonum Schema de Procedura Administrativa a relatore paratum post Consultorum Sessionem diebus 4-6 mensis Novembris 1971 habitam. (Report) [107 2012/1]

Comm 42 (2010), 389-395: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Commercium epistularum cum Secretaria Status quoad iuris redigendum Schema "De Procedura Administrativa". (Report) [107 2012/1]

Comm 42 (2010), 396-402: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Schema canonum de procedura administrativa. (Report) [107 2012/1]

Comm 42 (2010), 403-411: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Brevis relatio de animadversionibus quae factae sunt ad schema de procedura administrativa. (Report) [107 2012/1]

Comm 42 (2010), 412-436: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Procedura Administrativa": Specialis Commissio Pontificia Coetus Studii "De Procedura Administrativa". Sessio III – Series Altera – diebus 5-7 mensis februarii 1973 habita. (Report) [107 2012/1]

Comm 43 (2011), 209-219: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus studiorum "De procedura administrativa": Sextum canonum schema de procedura administrativa a relatore paratum post Consultorum Sessionem diebus 5-7 mensis februarii 1973 habitam. (Report) [109 2013/1]

Comm 43 (2011), 220-237: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus studiorum "De procedura administrativa": Ad sextum canonum schema de procedura administrativa animadversiones Consultorum. (Report) [109 2013/1]

Comm 43 (2011), 238-257: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus studiorum "De procedura administrativa": Documentum "motu proprio" propositum de procedura administrativa ad Secretariam Status transmissum. (Report) [109 2013/1]

Comm 43 (2011), 439-440: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus studiorum "De procedura administrativa" – Nota quoad commercium epistularum inter Secretaria Status et Pontificiam Commissionem CIC recognoscendo circa publicationem Schematis "De procedura administrativa". (Note) [109 2013/1]

Comm 43 (2011), 441-467: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus studiorum "De procedura administrativa" – Coetus studii "De processibus" – Series Altera Sessio VIIa (diebus 14-19 maii 1979 habita). (Report) [109 2013/1]

Canon 1733

DPM 9 (2002), 139-153: Z. Grocholewski: Der Dienst der Liebe in der kirchlichen Gerichtsbarkeit. (Lecture) [92 2004/2]

DPM 9 (2002), 211-244: J. Eder: Gerichtlicher Schutz im Kirchlichen Arbeitsrecht. (Article) [92 2004/2]

IC 60/119 (2020), 243-267: Paolo Gherri: Note teoriche intorno all’utilizzo del can. 1733 CIC. (Article) [125 2021/1]

IE XXIII 2/11, 487-499: Benedetto XVI: Discorso alla Plenaria del Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica, 4 febbraio 2011 (con nota di Javier Canosa, L'attività del Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica a servizio della comunione nella Chiesa). (Address and commentary) [108 2012/2]

KIP 6 (19) 2017, nr. 2, 93-106: Agnieszka Romanko: Potrzeba erygowania stałych organów mediacyjnych w polskim prawie partykularnym (The need to establish permanent mediation bodies in Polish particular law). (Article) [120 2018/2]

LS 26 4/01, 346-366: Rik Torfs: Church Tribunals secundum and praeter legem. (Article) [90 2003/2]

QDE 19 (2006), 141-157: Alberto Perlasca: Conferimento e cessazione dell'ufficio ecclesiastico. Problemi di rapporto con l'ordinamento civile. (Article) [97 2007/1]

RDC 55 1/05, 59-94: Kurt Martens: Les procédures administratives dans l'Église catholique: les initiatives en droit particulier et le Code de 1983. (Article) [96 2006/2]

SC 47 (2013), 145-181: Daniel Roseman: Mediation in the Church: A Review of the Literature and of the Key Elements of Mediation. (Article) [111 2014/1]

Mirosław Sitarz: Competences of Collegial Organs in a Particular Church. (Book) (Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin, 2013) [113 2015/1]

Canons 1733-1735

ADC 8 (abril 2019), 89-140: Francisco José Zamora García: Incidencia de los cánones 1733-1735 en la solución de los litigios administrativos. (Article) [123 2020/1]

Canons 1733-1737

SC 36 (2002), 225-252: K. Martens: La protection juridique dans l'Église: les tribunaux administratifs, la conciliation, et du Due Process. (Article) [90 2003/2]

Canon 1734

Ap LXXIX 3-4 (2006), 765-800: Michele Riondino: Profili comparatistici della mediazione familiare in Europa. (Article) [101 2009/1]

IE IX 1/98, 189-195: Supremo Tribunale della Signatura Apostolica: Suppressionis paroeciae et reductionis ecclesiae in usum profanum non sordidum. Decreto definitivo, 4 maggio 1996. Em.mo Agustoni, Prefetto, Ponente. (Sentence) [82 1999/2]

IE XXVI (2014), 89-111: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica: Decreto del Segretario, Scelta della chiesa di una nuova parrocchia, 5 luglio 2011; Decreto del Prefetto in Congresso, Soppressione di parrocchia, 23 settembre 2011; Decreto del Segretario, Circa l'uso di una chiesa, 20 gennaio 2012 (con nota di Javier Canosa, I diversi effetti della tutela garantita dal diritto amministrativo canonico). (Documents and commentary) [113 2015/1]

Ius Comm V (2017), 309-333: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: Sentencia definitiva, 22 octubre 2014. Rechazo de un recurso. (Sentence, with comment by Alberto Perlasca) [120 2018/2]

Per 105 (2016), 435-455: Matthias Ambros: Il vicario generale nel sistema dei ricorsi gerarchici. L’interpretazione del can. 1734 §3 1º. (Article) [118 2017/2]

QDE 33 (2020), 205-224: G. Paolo Montini: I tribunali ecclesiastici competenti in materia di privacy in Germania. (Article) [125 2021/1]

QDE 33 (2020), 334-355: Matthias Ambros: Il ricorso gerarchico contro la decisione di un delegato: L’interpretazione del can. 1734 §3, 1º. (Article) [126 2021/2]

Canons 1734-1738

EE 94 (2019), 785-823: Francisco José Zamora: Requisitos y efectos de la interposición del recurso jerárquico. (Article) [124 2020/2]

Canons 1736-1737

AkK 172 (2003), 84-96: Péter Erdö: Das "Heil der Seelen" im Codex Iuris Canonici. Ein öffentlich-rechtliches Prinzip der Interpretation und der Rechtsanwendung. (Article) [93 2005/1]

Canon 1737

QDE 31 (2018), 215-224: Alberto Perlasca: Can. 1737: il diritto di un gruppo di fedeli alla legittimazione attiva per proporre un ricorso gerarchico contro il decreto del proprio vescovo. (Article) [121 2019/1]

QSR 18 (2008), 207-208: Romanae Rotae Tribunalis Decanus: Decretum: Veronen. Poenalis. (Document) [103 2010/1]

QSR 18 (2008), 218-219: Romanae Rotae Tribunalis Decanus: Decretum: Premislien. Latinorum. Diffamationis. (Document) [103 2010/1]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Antonio Rella Ríos: El recurso contra los decretos penales aprobados o emitidos por la Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe (SST art. 27). (Doctoral thesis) (Laborum – Universidad Católica de Valencia, Colecciones Tesis Doctorales n° 1, 2021) [129 2023/1]

Canon 1738

Ap LXXXIX (2016), 371-411: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: 1. Prot n. 47637/13 CA, Dimissionis a consociatione (D.na N. – Pontificium Consilium pro Laicis): a) Decretum Praefecti, 10 ianuarii 2014; b) Decretum definitivum, 22 octobris 2014; 2. Prot n. 49014/14 CA, Reductionis ecclesiae in usum profanum (Adv. N. et alii – Congregatio pro Clericis): a) Decretum Secretarii, 2 augusti 2014; b) Decretum Congressus, 27 martii 2015; Cristian Begus: Adnotationes in Decreta. (Decrees and comment) [121 2019/1]

Canon 1739

IE XXXIII (2021), 241-274: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica, 2 ottobre 2018, Prot. n. 52094/16 CA, Ordinariato Militare N. Della soppressione della parrocchia X presso l’Accademia Militare Y (Rev.do Z e altri – Congregazione per il Clero), con un commento di Giovanni Parise, Soppressione di una parrocchia e impossibilità di sanare un atto amministrativo illegittimo da parte del superiore gerarchico. (Definitive sentence and comment) [127 2022/1]

Per XCVI 2/07, 249-284: Andrea D'Auria: Causa petendi e reformatio in peius: alcune considerazioni sul can. 1739. (Article) [99 2008/1]

Per 105 (2016), 135-154: Johannes Fürnkranz: Die entscheidungsfindung nach can. 1739. Einige prozessrechtliche anmerkungen. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Canon 1740

BEF LXXXIII 1/07, 65-76: Augustine Mendonça: Consultation with Two Parish Priests in the Removal of a Parish Priest. (Consultation) [102 2009/2]

CLSN 134/03, 8-16: Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales: DTI Discussion Document on Employment Status in Relation to Statutory Employment Rights. (Document) [92 2004/2]

CLSN 134/03, 17-20: G. Read: The Employment Status of Catholic Clergy. (Comment) [92 2004/2]

CLSN 137/04, 45-64: G. Ingels: Safeguarding Rights when Investigating Allegations of Misconduct of Clergy and Religious. (Paper) [94 2005/2]

CLSN 137/04, 65-68: G. Read: The Safeguarding of Rights when Investigating Allegations of Misconduct by Clergy and Religious. (Comment) [94 2005/2]

CLSN 152/07, 44-47: Gordon Read: The Cumberlege Commission Report. (Article) [100 2008/2]

IE VII 1/95, 131-152: P. Gefaell: La tutela del soggetto nella perdita dell'ufficio. (Article) [76 1996/2]

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1740-1741

IE XXXV (2023), 31-54: Armand Paul Bosso: Une codification déontologique du ministère du cure? (Article) [131 2024/1]

Canons 1740-1747

AkK 181 (2012), 386-443: Martin Rehak: Jurisdiktionsprimat und Absetzung von Bischöfen. Systematische Nachbetrachtungen. (Article) [112 2014/2]

Ap LXXXVIII (2015), 405-438: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: Decreta; Cristian Begus: Adnotationes in Decreta. (Documents and comment) [118 2017/2]

FCan XV/2 (2020), 7-37: Mário Rui de Oliveira: A Assinatura Apostólica e os tribunais eclesiásticos portugueses: a competência da vigilância na administração da justiça e o contencioso administrativo. II Parte: A remoção dos Párocos e a tutela dos direitos dos fiéis na Igreja: os recursos e o contencioso administrativo na Assinatura Apostólica. (Article) [127 2022/1]

IC 52/103 (2012), 237-254: Decisiones del Supremo Tribunal de la Signatura Apostólica. (Documents) [109 2013/1]

Ius VII 1/16, 63-95: Johnson Kovoorputhenpurayil: The Right of Defence in the Administrative Process of the Removal of a Parish Priest. Part I: Canonical Causes and Procedures. (Article) [118 2017/2]

Ius VII 2/16, 231-257: Johnson Kovoorputhenpurayil: The Right of Defence in the Administrative Process of the Removal of a Parish Priest. Part II: Recourse against the Decree of Removal and Resolution of the Recourse. (Article) [119 2018/1]

QDE 21 (2008), 287-298: Luigi Barolo: La costituzione di un curatore nel procedimento di rimozione di un parroco affetto da infermità mentale. (Article) [103 2010/1]

RR 2004, 129-138: B. Daly – T. J. Paprocki – I. B. Waters: Removal of Pastor When Parish is Suppressed. (Advisory Opinions) [94 2005/2]

SCL II (2006), 275-296: Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura: Removal of a Parish Priest from Office: Decision coram Cacciavillan, 28 June 2003 (India). (Sentence) [98 2007/2]

Patricia M. Dugan (ed.): Advocacy Vademecum. (Book) (Wilson & Lafleur, Montreal, 2006) [97 2007/1]

Canons 1740-1752

AA XI (2004), 109-128: A. D. Busso: El tiempo de nombramiento de los párrocos. (Colloquium presentation) [95 2006/1]

Comm 40 (2008), 377-399: Ex Actis Pontificiae Commissionis Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo: Coetus Studiorum "De Processibus" (Sessio XIII). (Report) [106 2011/2]

FCan III/2 (2008), 149-164: Enrique Pérez Pujol: Como proceder na remoção do pároco para o bem das almas. (Article) [103 2010/1]

IE XXVII (2015), 105-114: Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica: Sentenza definitiva, coram Burke, Trasferimento, 1 dicembre 2009 (con nota di Javier Canosa, Aspetti dello statuto giuridico dei chierici trattati in due decisioni della Segnatura Apostolica). (Sentence and comment) [115 2016/1]

Ius Comm VII (2019), 361-401: Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal: Sentencia definitiva, 16 noviembre 2011, Remoción de la parroquia; Decreto definitivo, 16 enero 2016, Traslado de parroquia; Pablo E. Lamata Molina: Comentario. (Documents and comment) [124 2020/2]

PS XXXVI 106/01, 5-40: A. Mendonça: Justice and Equity in Decisions Involving Priests. (Article) [87 2002/1]

RMDC 9 2/03, 35-62: L. de Jesús Hernández M.: La estabilidad en el oficio parroquial: canon 522 del CIC de 1983. (Article) [92 2004/2]

SCL IV (2008), 287-340: Victor D'Souza: The Procedure for the Removal and Transfer of Pastors: Balancing the Rights. (Article) [102 2009/2]

Canon 1741

AnC 19 (2023) 2, 75-82: Piotr Kroczek - Weronika Lipińska: Kanoniczne konsekwencje nieodbierania przesyłek poleconych przez proboszcza na przykładzie kazusu (Canonical consequences of a parish priest’s failure to collect registered mail using a case example). (Article) [132 2024/2]

Canon 1742

BEF LXXXIII 1/07, 65-76: Augustine Mendonça: Consultation with Two Parish Priests in the Removal of a Parish Priest. (Consultation) [102 2009/2]

PCF IX (2007), 225-232: Augustine Mendonça: Consultation with Two Pastors in the Removal of a Pastor from Office. (Article) [100 2008/2]

Miroslaw Sitarz: Competences of Collegial Organs in a Particular Church. (Book) (Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin, 2013) [113 2015/1]

Canon 1745

PCF IX (2007), 225-232: Augustine Mendonça: Consultation with Two Pastors in the Removal of a Pastor from Office. (Article) [100 2008/2]

RR 2005, 114-119: N. Schöch: Inspection of the Acts in Procedures for the Removal or Transfer of Parish Priests. (Opinion) [96 2006/2]

Canon 1748

William L. Daniel: Ministerium Iustitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. (Book) (Gratianus, Wilson & Lafleur Montreal, 2011) [108 2012/2]

Canons 1748-1752

CLSN 104/95, 22-23: A Statement by Bishop Taylor Regarding the Transfer of Three Priests to Other Parishes. (Document) [77 1997/1]

CLSN 104/95, 24-32: P. Hayward: The Apostolic Signatura and Disputes Involving The Transfer of Parish Priests. (Article) [77 1997/1]

Canon 1752

AA XVII (2011), 247-264: Wojciech Góralski: La dimensione salvífica e pastorale del diritto canonico. (Article) [109 2013/1]

AkK 172 (2003), 84-96: Péter Erdö: Das "Heil der Seelen" im Codex Iuris Canonici. Ein öffentlich-rechtliches Prinzip der Interpretation und der Rechtsanwendung. (Article) [93 2005/1]

AkK 184 (2015), 16-33: Juan Ignacio Arrieta: Barmherzigkeit und kanonisches Recht. Die Erfahrung des lateinischen Kirchenrechts und die hermeneutische Aufgabe der Mediation. (Article) [117 2017/1]

AnC 3 (2007), 245-263: Piotr Steczkowski: Normy De gravioribus delictis Congregationi pro Doctrina Fide reservatis – wybrane aspekty (Selected problems on the Norms "De gravioribus delictis"). (Article) [105 2011/1]

Canonist 9/2 (2018), 140-167: Anthony Ekpo: The Canonical Principle of Periculum Mortis. (Article) [122 2019/2]

Comm 53 (2021), 564-574: Paenitentiaria Apostolica: “A servizio della suprema lex”, allocutio Em.mi Card. Mauro Piacenza occasione diei academici Facultatis Iuris Canonici S. Pio X in Venetia, die 10 novembris 2021. (Address) [129 2023/1]

EE 81 (2006), 673-698: Estanislao Olivares D'Angelo: La salus animarum y el proceso canónico matrimonial. (Article) [98 2007/2]

FC 11 (2008), 77-95: Szabolcs Anzelm Szuromi: Authority and Sacramentality in the Catholic Church. (Article) [104 2010/2]

FC 12 (2009), 23-30: Piotr Kroczek: Does obligatory canonical form of marriage contribute to salus animarum? (Article) [105 2011/1]

FCan II/2 (2007), 109-113: Elisa Maria Rodrigues de Araújo: A renúncia do Bispo diocesano por causa grave – o caso de Monsenhor Wielhus (comentário ao cân. 401 do Código de Dereito Canónico). (Article) [100 2008/2]

FCan II/2 (2007), 145-158: Pablo Gefaell: Fundamentos e limites da oikonomia na tradição oriental. (Article) [100 2008/2]

FCan XI/2 (2016), 35-75: Mário Rui de Oliveira: A reforma do processo matrimonial à luz dos princípios gerais do processo canónico. (Article) [118 2017/2]

FThC X (2021), 231-281: Presentazione del volume “Il Diritto Canonico tra salvezza e realtà sociale” di S. Em.za il Card. Péter Erdö (Roma, 24 novembre 2021 – Venezia, 26 novembre 2021). (Compilation) [129 2023/1]

IC XLIV 87/04, 141-151: P. Pellegrino: La salus animarum. (Article) [94 2005/2]

IE XII 2/00, 291-306: J. Herranz: Salus animarum, principio dell'ordinamento canonico. (Lecture) [86 2001/2]

IE XII 2/00, 307-326: P. Moneta: La salus animarum nel dibattito della scienza canonistica. (Article) [86 2001/2]

IE XII 2/00, 327-341: C. J. Errázuriz: La salus animarum tra dimensione comunitaria ed esigenze individuali della persona. (Article) [86 2001/2]

IE XII 2/00, 343-374: J. I. Arrieta: La salus animarum quale guida applicativa del diritto da parte dei pastori. (Article) [86 2001/2]

IE XII 2/00, 375-418: H. Pree: Le tecniche canoniche di flessibilizzazione del diritto: possibilità e limiti ecclesiali di impiego. (Article) [86 2001/2]

IE XII 2/00, 419-436: P. Gefaell: Fondamenti e limiti dell'oikonomia nella tradizione orientale. (Article) [86 2001/2]

IE XII 2/00, 437-463: P. O'Callaghan: Il principio della "salus animarum" nelle altre confessione cristiane. (Lecture) [86 2001/2]

IE XII 2/00, 465-493: I. Pérez de Heredia: I profili ecumenici della "salus animarum" nella codificazione della Chiesa Cattolica. (Article) [86 2001/2]

ITS 57 (2020), 669-689: Innasi Amalraj: Amendments in the Code of Canon Law – 1983 [up to 2020]: The Canonical and Pastoral Influences in the Life of the Church (Part I). (Article) [126 2021/2]

J 55 (1995), 664-697: Augustine Mendonça: The Application of the Principle of Equity in Marriage Nullity Cases. (Article) [78 1997/2]

ME CXXV 4/00, 734-766: C. Hettinger: Life under Law with Equity. (Article) [87 2002/1]

ME CXXV 4/00, 767-796: C. Hettinger: La vita sotto la Legge con equità. (Article) [87 2002/1]

PCF VIII (2006), 65-106: Vicente R. Uy: The Principle of Equity in the Code of Canon Law. (Article) [98 2007/2]

PCF XII (2010), 69-99: John A. Renken: Periculum Mortis: Danger of Death in Church Law. (Article) [108 2012/2]

Per 111 (2022), 139-171: Anthony Ekpo: Periculum mortis: applying the ultimate goal of canon law. (Note) [129 2023/1]

Proc ANZ 2000, 55-60: I. B. Waters: A Tribunal Case Concerning Clergy Remuneration. (Conference Paper) [87 2002/1]

QSR 18 (2008), 7-9: Antoni Stankiewicz: L'indirizzo d'omaggio del Decano S.E. Mons Antoni Stankiewicz a Sua Santità Benedetto XVI. (Address) [103 2010/1]

RDC 45 1995, 147-149: Richard Puza: Les échos de l'Affaire Gaillot en Allemagne. (Article) [76 1996/2]

RfR 64 1/05, 94-98: E. McDonough: Salus Animarum. (Article) [95 2006/1]

SC 39 (2005), 203-220: Jean Paul Betengne: Équité canonique et salus animarum. (Article) [97 2007/1]

SC 42 (2008), 59-85: Noël Simard: La bioéthique et le droit canonique. (Article) [103 2010/1]

AC 54 (2012), 31-279: Colloque « Nature, grâce et droit canonique », 15-16 novembre 2012. (Conference) [114 2015/2]

P. Erdö: Salus Animarum: Suprema Lex. La funzione dei riferimenti alla salvezza delle anime nei due Codici della Chiesa cattolica. (Symposium Presentation in Congregazione per le Chiese Orientali: Ius Ecclesiarum – Vehiculum Caritatis, pp. 573-585) (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2004) [94 2005/2]

José Fernández San Román: La Salus animarum como fin del derecho canónico en el pensamiento de Javier Hervada a la luz del iter redaccional del can. 1752 CIC de 1983. (Article in Forum: Supplement to Acta Philosophica, Pontificia Università della Santa Croce, EDUSC, Volume 5/2, Rome, 2019, pp. 829-846). [125 2021/1]

Robert Ombres: Canonical equity. (Article in Ius divinum. Atti del XIII Congresso Internazionale di Diritto Canonico, Venezia 17-21 settembre 2008, Marcianum Press, Venice, 2010, pp. 545-554) [108 2012/2]